DESIGNING WITH STEEL FORM DECK

Similar documents
North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS SECTION: METAL WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER:

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

Industry Standard Terms & Definitions Of The Steel Deck Institute

Design Manual and Catalog of Steel Deck Products STEEL DECK INSTITUTE MEMBER

Structural Redesign Gravity System

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR METAL PLASTER BASES (LATH) PREFACE

Structural vs Nonstructural Members. Roger LaBoube, Ph.D., P.E. Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC.

ENGINEERS ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS DEEP-DEK COMPOSITE COMPOSITE LONG SPAN FLOOR DECK.

Design No. P922 September 26, Restrained Assembly Rating 1, 1-1/2 or 2 Hr (See Items 6, 7) Unrestrained Assembly Rating 0 Hr (See Item 6)

LPI 56 Technical Guide

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

The New SDI Diaphragm Design Manual

SJI Code of Standard Practice

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Project Address: Name of Person Completing Form:

Design No. P921 April 16, Restrained Assembly Rating 1, 1-1/2 or 2 Hr (See Items 4, 6, 7 and 9) Unrestrained Assembly Rating 0 Hr (See Item 7)

SECTION PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

AISC Steel & Timber Research for High-Rise Residential Buildings

HAMBRO COMPOSITE FLOOR SYSTEM

Structural Technical Report #2 By Robert Whitaker

Lightweight Steel Framing. Composite DeltaStud Load Tables

CH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION

FORMDECK. constructions. constructions

CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE

Lintel Tables Design Notes and Limitations

ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS. TEK 17-1C Structural (2009) Related TEK: Uniform load. Triangular load. Concentrated loads

Copyright. magazine. CFS Load Bearing Construction

GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS CURA ADJUSTABLE REROOF FRAMING SYSTEMS SECTION REROOFING ADJUSTABLE FRAMING SYSTEM

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

ASD OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS BASED ON THE 2012 IBC/2011 MSJC. TEK 17-1D Structural (2011) Related TEK: 14-7C, 14-13B, 17-1C, 17-2A

16. Design of Pipeline Structures.

MAX-CORE I-JOIST DESIGN MANUAL-US

Product Designation As specified in the AISI standard for cold formed steel framing General provisions A5.2.

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS SECTION: METAL WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER:

PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC.

How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam

Allowable Loads for Round Timber Poles

1. Cast-in-place concrete is specified in Section

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued January 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

1 Exam Prep Placing Reinforcing Bars Tabs and Highlights

CHAPTER 26 PLASTIC SECTION BC 2601 SECTION BC 2603 GENERAL FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION

POST FRAME BUILDING STANDARDS

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

Technical Assignment 1 10/8/03

Bjorhovde, R. Stub Girder Floor Systems Structural Engineering Handbook Ed. Chen Wai-Fah Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999

CHAPTER 3 BUILDINGS WITH WOOD FRAMED EXTERIOR WALLS 301 SCOPE

Nasser Marafi. Alternate Floor Systems. Pro Con Structural Study of. Technical Report 2. Center & Facility Service Building

June 1, 2012 PARTIES INTERESTED IN COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures

Appendix I ESTIMATED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE AND STRENGTHS OF CONNECTIONS OF JOPLIN HOME DEPOT BUILDING

REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL

Fundamentals of Post Tensioned Concrete Design for Buildings

TECH FACTS. Formulas for Success Innovative Ways to Reinforce Slabs-On-Ground

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

Design No. D925 December 10, Restrained Assembly Ratings 3/4, 1, 1-1/2, 2 or 3 Hr. (See Items 1, 6 and 10)

Sprinkler Identification Numbers (SINs)

The following are details of the code requirements of the 2015 International Residential Code for single-story decks.

Structural Tests and Special Inspections Form. Inspection of Fabricators (1704.2)

STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

FROM: SUBJECT: HILTI X-ENP-19, X-HSN 24 or X-U POWDER-ACTUATED FASTENER SUBSTITUTION REQUEST

Design of Semi gravity Retaining Walls

Section A A: Slab & Beam Elevation

a difficult challenge when trying to achieve effective coverage within a shallow space. The Model CC1 Combustible

SHEET METAL ROOF TEST REPORT

Trusted SECTION: 04 HILTI, INC. TULSA, Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. not specifically. Copyright 2015

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

AIA St. Louis January 4 th, 2017 Phillip Shinn, PE Jacobs Engineering Washington University in St. Louis, Sam Fox School of Design and Visual Arts

Lateral Design of Mid- Rise Wood Structures

ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California *Revised April 2003

UL Online Certifications Directory

One and Two Family Additions

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued October 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

The System Slotted Deflection Track (pat# 5,913,788)

INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER

CITY OF RICHMOND PINE CAMP COMMUNITY CENTER ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT RCS PROJECT NO

Eric Alwine Structural Option George Read Hall The University of Delaware Dr. Boothby Technical Assignment #2 October 31, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 1000 PLANO, TEXAS EVALUATION SUBJECT: HILTI LOW-VELOCITY POWER-ACTUATED FASTENERS

ANSI/APA PRS Standard for Performance-Rated Structural Insulated Panels in Wall Applications

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

REPORT HOLDER: BLUE POINT FASTENING, INC YORBA COURT CHINO, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

MECHANICAL BRIDGING AND BRIDGING ANCHORAGE OF LOAD BEARING COLD-FORMED STEEL STUDS. Paul E. Lackey, EIT Nabil A. Rahman, Ph.D.

BISON PRECAST FLOORING SPECIFICATION

WIND & SEISMIC 2008 EDITION ASD/LRFD WITH COMMENTARY. American Forest & Paper Association. American Wood Council ANSI/AF&PA SDPWS-2008

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: ROOFING AND SIDING PANELS REPORT HOLDER: KINGSPAN INSULATED PANELS, INC.

MID-RISE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

SECTION ALUMINUM GATES

Transcription:

DESIGNING WITH STEEL FORM DECK All rights reserved 2003 P.O. Box 25 Fox River Grove, IL 60021 Phone: (847) 458-4647 Fax: (847) 458-4648

Form deck is a term used to describe deck that is most frequently used as a stay in place form for structural concrete. Form deck might be considered a misnomer because the material is used in many other ways. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the usual form use as well as some of the other functions and present some of the engineering and experience that influences the design. Because this deck type can be used in such a variety of ways it has not had the same design or profile constraints that have influenced the shapes of the two other conventional products roof deck and composite deck. Indeed, almost any deck, including floor deck and roof deck, can be considered to be form deck simply depending on its use. Figure 1 shows form deck profiles regularly produced by SDI member companies and Figure 2 shows some of the custom products produced to satisfy a particular job. The gages range from 10 (0.135 in., 3.4 mm) to 28 (0.0149 in., 0.38 mm) and the depths range from 9/16 in. (14 mm) to 7.6 in. (193 mm). This great variety of types illustrates that the product covers a wide range of uses. The steel grades also cover a wide variety specified yield points range from 33 to 80 ksi. Form for Reinforced Concrete Slabs When deck is used as a stay in place form for reinforced concrete slabs the first obvious question is how the ribs influence the slab design. The second, not so obvious question, is about the functions the deck performs after the slab is in use. For building construction the rib influence on the slab design is illustrated in figure 3. 2

Figure 1 STANDARD FORM DECK 30" cover 9" 16 2 1/2" Pitch 13" 16 13" 16 approx. scale: 1 1/2" = 1'0" TYPICAL 1" DEEP FORM DECK 27" cover 1" 1 1/2" 4 1/2" Pitch 1 1/2" approx. scale: 1 1/2" = 1'0" TYPICAL 1 5/16" FORM DECK 1 5/16" 36" cover 1 5/8 " 5.14 pitch 1 5/8 " approx. scale: 1 1/2" = 1'0" TYPICAL 2" FORM DECK 30" cover 2" 2" 2" 6" pitch approx. scale: 1 1/2" = 1'0" Figure 2 CUSTOM DECK 7.6" 9" 3" 9" 2" 3" 9" 3" 24" 3

Figure 3 Draped Mesh Slabs: Deck depth = h; Total Slab Depth = D; Wire diameter = w; h < 1.5" D = 2.5" to 3" +d = (D - h)/2 - d = (D - h)/2 + h/2 = D/2 TOP COVER = 0.75" h pitch +d D - d D > 3" +d = (D - h - w/2) - d = (D - h/2-3w/2-0.75") TOP COVER = 0.75" - d +d D pitch Note 1: For D < 3" place the mesh in the center of the concrete that is above the ribs. For D > 3", mesh is draped, not layered. h 1.5" +d = (D - h - w/2) - d = (D - 0.75-3w/2) TOP COVER = 0.75" - d pitch + d D Note 2: Note 1 Note 2 For negative bending the b width for Inverted B deck is 7.5". For D > 3" mesh is draped, not layered. Form decks with h < 1.5 and Pitch < 6.0 have a slab b width of 12 for both positive and negative bending. Form decks with h 1.5 or Pitch 6.0 have a slab b width of 12 for positive bending and a b width for negative bending = average rib width x 12/pitch. b is the concrete compression width. These design considerations evolved from experience rather than from an extensive research program and, in general, reflect the normal conservative approach used by engineers. For stay in place bridge forms the rib influence depends on the design considerations of the particular state highway department. Figure 4 shows a cross section of bridge form panel. For more information on bridge form see the SDI paper on this subject. Figure 4 Coverage Top flange Depth Pitch top opening 4

Deck manufacturers are more concerned with the performance of form deck under construction loading than the slab design. The deck must be capable of supporting the concrete weight and the loads of workmen during the concrete placing phase. The slab design is the responsibility of the design engineer or architect. For building construction, the SDI construction loading shown in Figure 5 is used. Figure 5 1 SPAN 123456 l R 1 R 2 P l R 1 = R 2 = 0.5wl +M = wl 2 / 8 def.* = 0.013wl 4 / EI or +M = 0.25Pl + wl 2 / 8 uniform concrete load P concentrated man or equipment load (150 lbs./ft. of width unfactored) Key 1234567 uniform construction load (20 psf, unfactored) l clear span 2 SPAN 12345678901 l l R 1 R 2 R 3 P R 2 = 1.25wl V = 0.625 wl at interior support +M = 0.070 wl 2 - M = 0.125 wl 2 def.* = 0.0054 wl 4 EI l l +M = 0.203 Pl + 0.096 wl 2 - M = 0.094 Pl + 0.063 wl 2 3 SPAN 123456789012 123456789012 l l l R 1 R 2 R 3 12345678 l l l R 1 R 2 R 3 P R 4 R 4 R 1 R 2 V R 2 = R 4 = 0.4wl = R 3 = 1.10wl = 0.60 wl at interior support +M = 0.08 wl 2 -M = 0.10 wl 2 def.* = 0.0069wl 4 /EI = 1.20 wl +M = 0.074 wl 2 - M = 0.117 wl 2 V = 0.617 wl at interior support l l l + M = 0.20 Pl + 0.094 wl 2 For single spans only, the concrete load shall include either an additional 50% of the concrete weight or 30 psf whichever is less. * Deflection is to be calculated using only concrete plus deck weights uniformly distributed over all spans. 5

This is the same loading used for composite floor deck. The loading formulas are used to calculate the maximum allowable unshored spans; most slab construction is done without the use of intermediate shores. If there are construction loading conditions different than those shown in Figure 5. The engineer should either calculate the spans (or effects) based on the loading or contact the deck manufacturer to assist in the calculations. For building construction the slab design can be influenced by the choice of form deck. If the deck selected is not shored, and if the deck finish is selected so the deck can be considered permanent, then the deck will continue to carry the slab dead load for the life of the structure and the slab needs reinforcing only to carry the service loads. For most exposures a permanent finish is galvanizing. Another influence on designing the reinforcing is that the deck does provide some unknown amount of shrinkage reinforcement. Many successful slabs have been constructed with less than the ACI recommended amount of temperature steel. A word of caution is needed about the use of randomly placed fibers (fibrous admixtures) in lieu of standard reinforcing bars or welded wire fabric. Fibrous admixtures should not be used to replace reinforcement. If fibers are inadvertently used for this purpose, then the form deck is to be considered the sole load carrying member for stress purposes. There may also be fire considerations that are compromised by the substitution. Draped mesh construction is very frequently used with form deck see Figure 6. Draped Mesh Figure 6 welded wire fabric draped over beam bolster slabs over 3" deep 3/4" cover slab depth form deck With this type of construction the deck usually bonds to the slab and for uniform service loads (such as in offices) the deflection calculation can be done in a similar manner used for composite decks; that is, the composite I is calculated by averaging the cracked and uncracked transformed sections where the form deck provides the steel reinforcing. The contribution of the welded wire fabric is not included in the calculation. If concentrated loads are part of the design, then the design engineer may feel more comfortable using only the cracked transformed I; again the welded wire fabric is not included. Individual deck manufacturers can provide their I values on request. For bar reinforced slabs it is 6

suggested that the stiffness be calculated using the standard transformed section analysis. The deck may be added into the calculation at the discretion of the designer. For buildings, the distribution of concentrated loads can be done in the same way as done for composite slabs. The formulas are shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 b m b 2 b m = b 2 + 2t c + 2t t t t h t c t t = thickness of a durable topping (if none is used t t = 0) distribution steel b m = b 2 + 2t c + 2t t single span bending: b e = b m + 2(1 - x/ l)x; where x is the location of the load. continuous span bending: b e = b m + 4/3 (1 - x / l)x shear: b e = b m + (1 - x / l)x P but in no case shall b e > 8.9(t c /h), feet. b e weak axis Moment = Pb e 15w w = l + b 3 ; but not to exceed l 2 Curved lines represent distribution of force. b2 b 3 w 7

Vertical shear can be checked as it is for composite slabs. The shear resistance is the sum of the deck shear resistance and the concrete, but the total of φv deck + φv concrete is not allowed to exceed φ 4 (f' c ) 1/2 A c. Published deck properties include the shear resistance and also the A c for various slab depths. Insulating Fills on Form Deck Lightweight insulating cementitious fill roof systems are supported by form deck. This construction may also include embedded rigid insulation boards within the poured fill material. In most cases the fill material has an aggregate of some insulating material such as vermiculite, expanded perlite, foamed glass, or simply be very highly air entrained where the air bubbles are the aggregate. The fill material is generally not considered to add to the vertical load carrying capacity the deck is selected to carry this load but it does add to the stiffness and to the diaphragm strength. Individual fill manufacturers can provide load limits based on deflection and may also provide diaphragm tables. The Steel Deck Institute (SDI) has diaphragm tables for the sole generic form deck (2 ½ x ½ ) both with an without embedded boards. Not all fill material types are covered in the SDI tables. In many cases the fill material contains a great deal of water. Some of this water is absorbed by aggregate materials and the fill stays rather damp. During the life of the roof system it will be subject to many days of solar exposure and the heat can cause a vapor pressure to develop within the fill. The form deck must be vented to relieve the pressure so that the roof membrane is not distressed. When these fill systems were new in the market, the deck was vented by either installing clips or rolling indentations into the side laps to create a venting space along each deck edge. Tests were done at Granco Steel Products Company to determine the venting ability of deck with rolled in slits. These tests showed vents that provided between 1 and 1.5% of the projected area were sufficient to relieve the vapor pressure. However more important than the actual area size was the distribution of the vents. Small well distributed slits were better than widely spaced large openings. Because of the great amount of water in the mix and because some of the insulative additives hold water for a long time, and because the deck must carry the load for the life of the roof, a galvanized finish is required. If insulation boards are embedded in the fill material it is recommended that the boards be held away at least three feet from the edges where the diaphragm shear transfers into the frame. For calculating the maximum deck spans with insulating fills, the same construction loads as shown in figure 5 are used. 8

When form deck is used with structural reinforced concrete the deck may be shored if it is over spanned for construction loadings. This is not the case with insulating fill. Since the fill adds no vertical load capacity to the system shoring must not be used - the steel deck must be selected to carry all of the load. Also, unlike structural concrete, the weight of the fill material decreases significantly after drying. The wet fill material may weigh 40 to 75 pounds per cubic foot, but after drying it may range from 20 to 50. Unless known with greater accuracy, it is suggested that the wet weight for construction be taken at 50 pcf and the dry weight be 35 pcf. Example problem number 1 uses structural normal weight concrete to find the maximum allowable unshored span for a typical form deck. The same procedure can be used to determine the suitability of a form deck to carry light weight insulating fills. However, a final check should be made on the ability of the form to carry subsequent service loads. This check can be done by simply referring to the manufacturer's uniform load tables. Exposed Roofing Form deck as exposed roofing runs a wide range of uses from temporary coverings to permanent architectural applications. The details of construction vary with the application. For instance if the use is to provide temporary cover over a walkway, then perhaps complete sealing against leaks may not be too important and side laps may be done without any extra attention. If, on the other hand, the roof is to be a permanent cover then some thought should be given to continuously caulking the seam; perhaps with a caulking tape. Slope also helps to keep water out of joints and slopes 45 or greater do not generally require caulking. Attention should also be given to the form deck orientation. Figure 8 shows the common B (wide rib) roof deck used inverted as exposed roofing. Figure 8 Type B 36" Coverage (B36) (30" Coverage (B30) and (BI30) also available) 6" 1 1/2" 2 1/2" By inverting the deck the side lap is kept high and out of the bottom of the gutter. While this detail is recommended for exposed roofs it is incorrect for built up roofs because the insulation board would have less bearing and a greater rib opening to span. Thermal movement of roof panels should also be considered. For most insulated buildings continuous sheet lengths should not exceed 60 (18 m). Exposed screw fasteners should have neoprene sealing washers. 9

The standard uniform load tables are applicable for exposed roofing. The usual loads are caused by snow and wind. Some thought should be given to individual man loads but no standard has been written to address this. It is the recommendation of the SDI, that the deck be examined with a 200 pound load distributed over a 1 width at mid span. The deflection should not exceed l/120 and the stress should be limited to F y / 1.24 (for ASD). Since most man loading occurs during erection a contractor may plank the deck if these guide values cannot be met. Uplift loads caused by wind can cause a slightly different uniform load table for the form deck. Frequently, in ASD, the design stress is allowed a 1/3 stress increase. In most cases the uplift capacity is not controlled by the deck but by the fasteners used to attach the deck to the structure. The most common control mechanism for screws is pull over. Figure 9 gives pull over values for various screw head diameters. Figure 9 Pull over strength generally controls the uplift values of screws. The table for pull over covers roof deck with a tensile strength (F u ) of 45 ksi which is the lowest of the acceptable range for roof deck, and 60 ksi for form deck. The roof deck gage range is 16 to 22 gage; the form deck gages are 24, 26, 28. Screw pull out from structural steel framing or from joists is not a failure mode. Pull out failure is a definite possibility when light gage framing is used. The table shows pull out values for steel with 33, 40 and 50 ksi yields with corresponding tensile strength of 45, 55 and 65 ksi. Pull Over Values, Lbs. d w Gage 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 0.400 1610 1280 970 800 860 640 540 0.415 1680 1330 1000 830 890 670 560 0.430 1740 1380 1040 860 920 690 580 0.480 1940 1540 1160 960 1030 770 640 0.500 2020 1600 1210 1000 1080 810 670 The table pull over strengths lbs., are based on F u = 45 ksi for 16 thru 22 gage, and 60 ksi for 24 thru 28 gage. *t 1 is the thickness under the screw head or washer. SCREW DATA Avg. tested Screw d d w tensile Size dia. nom. head dia strength, kips 10 0.190 0.415 or 0.400 2.56 12 0.210 0.430 or 0.400 3.62 1 4 0.250 0.480 or 0.520 4.81 Pull Out Strength, Lbs. = P not = 850 t 2 d F u Screw # F u Gage, t 2 * 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 10 12 ¼ 45 980 760 540 435 345 260 215 55 1190 930 665 530 420 320 260 65 1410 1100 785 630 500 375 310 45 45 1080 840 1290 1000 715 600 570 480 455 380 340 290 280 235 55 55 1320 1030 735 1570 1220 875 590 700 465 555 350 420 290 345 65 65 1560 1210 865 1860 1440 1030 825 695 655 550 495 415 405 340 * Use the SDI decimal thickness, t 2, for the gage of the material receiving the threads. The safety factor for pull over and pullout (ASD) is 3. The φ factor (LRFD) is 0.5. dw d Siding Form deck as siding is generally used in the more utilitarian structures. The uniform load tables apply when analyzing wind loads. If the wall is expected to also perform as a diaphragm then attention must be given to the fastenings. Caulking of side laps, flashing, insulation, and corner details use the same techniques as with other metal siding products. 10

Shelving Industrial storage systems frequently use form decks as load carrying planes installed in angle frames. The usual form deck length tolerance is normally 1/2 (13 mm) but for shelving it may be reduced to 1/4 (6 mm). This means that the rolling machine and the automatic shear must be slowed down and the increased production costs are reflected in the price of the product. Draft Curtains (Curtain Boards) Steel Form deck, because it is non combustible is frequently used in large open area buildings as a smoke control curtain. These curtains are made by hanging the deck vertically from primary structural members. The lightest available deck is obviously the best choice. The function of the curtains is to limit the spread of the heat and smoke below the ceiling and thereby aid in venting. Figure 10 shows the cross section of a building and the location of the vertically suspended curtains. Figure 10 The curtain spacing should not be greater than eight times the ceiling height and should be not less than 20% of the ceiling height where the ceiling height is measured at the vent. In most cases the curtain should be greater than 10 feet (3 m) above the floor. Smaller spacings of curtains may be needed around areas that are particularly subject to smoke damage in general the curtain spacing should not be closer than twice the ceiling height. Tighter spacings and deeper lengths can be needed around special hazards. Calculating Fire Resistance for Slabs with Form Deck There are several tested and U.L. listed assemblies for composite floor deck, both with and without spray on fire protection or suspended ceilings. U.L. allows the use of noncomposite form decks of the same cross section in these assemblies; the slabs must be appropriately reinforced. These ratings are covered in the D construction group of U.L. Many form deck ratings with spray on protection, drywall, or suspended ceilings are listed by U.L.; these are in the G construction group and the most common form deck in the ratings is the standard 0.5 x 2.5 (nominal) generic profile. No calculations are needed for these well defined constructions. 11

Any regularly ribbed deck can be used as a stay in place form. Fire resistance for ribbed formed slabs can be calculated by using the information published in Guidelines for Determining Fire Resistance Ratings of Building Elements, published by the Building Officials and Code Administrators International, (BOCA), Copyright 1994. No doubt this was written for deep ribs and fairly thin toppings as used in some precast concrete panels rather than steel deck formed slabs where ribs are generally shallow and concrete cover thicknesses can be relatively large. Therefore, the rule that the maximum effective thickness (t e ) cannot exceed two times the cover does not always limit the effective thickness to a reasonable amount because twice the concrete cover can frequently be greater than the total depth of the system. The SDI recommends an additional limit for steel deck formed slabs which is the effective thickness cannot be greater than the concrete cover plus the distance to the centroid of the steel deck as measured from the top of the form deck. Figure 11 shows the added limit. Figure 11 total t eff t C.G. y The rules for determining the equivalent thickness of formed slabs are: A. Where the spacing of ribs or undulations is equal to or greater than four times the minimum thickness, the equivalent thickness is the minimum thickness. B. Where the spacing of ribs or undulations is equal to or less than two times the minimum thickness, the equivalent thickness is calculated by dividing the net crosssectional area by the panel width. The maximum thickness used to calculate the net cross-sectional area shall not exceed two times the minimum thickness. C. Where the spacing of ribs or undulations exceeds two times the minimum thickness but is less than four times the minimum thickness, the equivalent thickness is calculated from the following formula: t + [(4t/s) - l] (t e - t) where: s = spacing of ribs or undulations t = minimum thickness t e = equivalent thickness calculated in accordance with item B The attached tables provide the effective thickness based on these rules for the standard form deck products made by SDI member companies. These tabulated effective 12

thicknesses can be used in conjunction with figure 12 to determine the hourly fire resistance of any particular form deck floor slab. Figure 12 Concrete Aggregate Type Siliceous Carbonate Sand-lightweight Lightweight * 1 inch = 25.4 mm Minimum eqivalent thickness (inches)* for fireresistance rating (hours) 1 hr. 1½ hrs. 2 hrs. 3 hrs. 4 hrs. 3.5 4.3 5.0 6.2 7.0 3.2 4.0 4.6 5.7 6.6 2.7 3.3 3.8 4.6 5.4 2.5 3.1 3.6 4.4 5.1 Rules A, B and C and Figure 12: Copyright 1994, Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc., Country Club Hills, Illinois. Guidelines for Determining Fire Resistance Ratings of Building Elements. Reprinted with permission of author. All rights reserved. Naturally the slab must be reinforced with bars or welded wire mesh in accordance with ACI design procedures in order to carry the intended superimposed load. The tabulated effective thicknesses are conservative when compared to successfully tested (and U.L. listed) systems. 13

Tables B and B Inverted 1.5" x 6" Deck (wide rib) 1.5000" x 6.0000" Cover, in. Total Slab Effective Thickness, in. Depth, in. B Deck B Inverted Control 2.0000 3.50 2.2 2.5 B 2.2500 3.75 2.5 2.8 B 2.5000 4.00 2.7 3.0 B 2.7500 4.25 3.0 3.3 B 3.0000 4.50 3.2 3.5 B 3.2500 4.75 3.5 3.9 C 3.5000 5.00 3.8 4.2 C 3.7500 5.25 4.1 4.5 C 4.0000 5.50 4.4 4.9 C 4.2500 5.75 4.7 5.1 C 4.5000 6.00 5.0 5.4 C 4.7500 6.25 5.3 5.6 C 5.0000 6.50 5.6 5.9 C 5.2500 6.75 5.9 6.1 C 5.5000 7.00 6.2 6.4 C 5.7500 7.25 6.4 6.6 C 6.0000 7.50 6.7 6.9 C 6.2500 7.75 6.9 7.1 C 6.5000 8.00 7.2 7.4 C 6.7500 8.25 7.4 7.6 C 7.0000 8.50 7.7 7.9 C Nominal 1/2" x 2.5" Form Deck 0.5625" x 2.5000" Total Slab Effective Cover, in. Depth, in. Thickness, in. Control 1.9375 2.50 2.2 C 2.1875 2.75 2.5 C 2.4375 3.00 2.7 C 2.6875 3.25 3.0 C 2.9375 3.50 3.2 C 3.1875 3.75 3.5 C 3.4375 4.00 3.7 C 3.6875 4.25 4.0 C 3.9375 4.50 4.2 C 4.1875 4.75 4.5 C 4.4375 5.00 4.7 C 4.6875 5.25 5.0 C 4.9375 5.50 5.2 C 5.1875 5.75 5.5 C 5.4375 6.00 5.7 C 5.6875 6.25 6.0 C 5.9375 6.50 6.2 C 14

Example Problem 1 20 gage inverted B (roof deck) is to be used as a form to carry a 6" (total depth) normal weight (145 pcf) concrete slab. Typical properties as obtained from manufacturers literature for the deck are: I = 0.21 in 4 ; S p = 0.26 in 3 ; S n = 0.25 in 3 ; φr = 3310 lbs; φv = 3880 lbs, Values of per foot of width; φr = is interior bearing, 4" width w (deck weight) = 1.9 psf; F y = 33000 psi; E = 29.5 x 10 6 psi For a three span condition, calculate the maximum unshored span - use LRFD procedures. The concrete volume for a 6" slab is 0.453 ft 3 /ft 2. Concrete = 145 x 0.453 = 65.7 psf Deck = 1.9 psf Refer to figure 5 for construction loading. Check interaction shear at bending at first interior support. -M applied = 0.117(1.6 x 65.7 + 1.4 x 20 + 1/2 x 1.9)(12)l 2 -M applied = 190.1l 2 inch lbs. where 1.6 is the load factor for the concrete; 1.4 is the load factor for the deck weight. These factors are obtained from the American Iron and Steel Institute Specification (1996). The φ factor for bending is 0.95 and the φ factor for shear has already been applied to the listed value. M nominal = 0.95 x 33000 x 0.25 = 7838 lb. inches V = 0.617(1.6 x 65.7 + 1.4 x 20 + 1.2 x 1.9)l = 83.5l lbs. The interaction formula: 2 2 M applied V + applied ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ) M nominal V nominal 1.0 190.1l 2 2 2 83.5l + = 1 7838 3880 Solving for l provides l = 6.38' Check one (of three) span loadings: 0.95 x 33000 x 0.26 = [0.20 x 150 x 1.4l +.094 (1.6 x 65.7 + 1.2 x 1.9)l 2 ]12 Solving for l provides l = 6.38' which is a coincidence that it is the same as the combined shear and bending calculation. Checking the interior reaction: With all spans loaded R int = 1.10 (1.6 x 65.7 + 1.4 x 20 + 1.2 x 1.9)l = 148.9l lbs. 148.9l = 3310 l = 22.2' Check deflection - limit is L/180. l(12)/180 =.0069(65.7)l 4 1728/29.5 x 10 6 x 0.21 l = 8.06' Stress controls and the maximum unshored span is 6.38' = 6'4 1/2". This can be considered as a clear span. 15

Example Problem 2 Review for uniform load the slab described in example problem 1, if reinforced with 4 x 4 and 4.0 x 4.0 draped welded wire reinforcing. The span is 6' - three span condition. Refer to figures 3 and 6. f'c = 3000 psi; F y = 60000 psi (WWR) A s = 0.120 in 2 /ft; wire dia. = 0.225 = w -d = (6-0.75-3 x 0.225/2) = 4.91" +d= (6-1.5-0.225/2) = 4.39" b width for negative bending = 7.5" b width for positive bending = 12" Standard concrete slab procedures are used to review for bending. M = φ A s F y (d - a/2); where φ = 0.90 a = depth of compression block = A s F y /(0.85 f'c b) for negative bending: a = 0.120(60000/0.85 x 3000 x 7.5) a = 0.376" for positive bending: a = 0.120(60000/(0.85 x 3000 x 12) a = 0.235" -M = 0.90(0.120)60000(4.91-0.376/2) = 30,600 in. lbs. +M = 0.90(0.120)(60000)(4.39-0.235/2) = 27,700 in. lbs. The SDI method for determining the concrete area for shear is as illustrated below. The area for a 6" slab on inverted B deck is listed as 54 square inches. Shear Area of Concrete total slab depth, h deck depth shaded areas represent area of concrete available to resist shear pitch overlapping areas but if the slab depth causes the areas to overflap then the area is adjusted to not exceed the shape provided with the deck pitch as the top dimension. pitch 16

Example Problem 2 A c = 54 in 2 Because not all the concrete area is used it could be argued that enough compensation for shear area above the negative steel has been made so that the total available area is indeed 54 in. 2. However, for this problem the conservative deduction of 0.75 x 12 = 9 in. 2 is made. A c = 54-9 = 45 φv c = φ2(f c) ½ A c = 0.85 x 2 x (3000) ½ 45 = 4190 lbs. φv s = 3880 lbs. φv s = φv c = 3880 + 4190 = 8070 lbs. Check: Limit V to < φ 4 (f c) ½ A c φ x 4 x (3000) ½ 45 = 9859 > 8070 Deflection: For uniform loading the composite I can be used. The published composite I for this deck/slab is 17 in. 4 (per foot). The ACI coefficients are: +M is an end span = 0.091wl 2 - M= 0.083wl 2 V = 0.58wl live load deflection < l/360 Since the deck is unshored and is galvanized it will carry the slab dead load permanently. +φm = 27700 = 1.6(.091W l) 6 2 (12) W l = 440 psf -φm = 30600 = 1.6(.083W l ) 6 2 (12) W l = 533 psf φv = 0.58W l (6) = 8070 lbs. W l = 2310 psf = 6(12) = 0.20" =.0069W l (6) 4 1728 360 29.5 x 10 6 x 17 W l = 6490 psf Obviously, the load is controlled by positive bending and is 440 psf. It is common for the capacity to far exceed the need. 17