Chapter 2 PROJECT COORDINATION PROCESS

Similar documents
SCDOT Geotechnical Manual Updates. Nicholas E. Harman, MS PE

CHAPTER 13. New January 1, 2013 SUE. Subsurface Utility Engineering. Designation and Location. Chapter Contents

I-35W Retaining Wall Design Exhibit A - Draft Scope of Work

I. Project Overview and Limits. Project Goal

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX B-2 FLOODWALL PILE ANALYSES EAST WALLS

ENGINEERING DIRECTIVE

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY DIVISION

UTILITY COORDINATION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS

UPRR criteria for sizing waterway openings under bridges and through culverts are as follows:

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PIPELINE AND UTILITY INSTALLATION IN SOIL AND ROCK BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING (HDD)

August 17, DCN Number: ALB07WP001 Revision: 0. Prepared By: 8300 Jefferson NE Suite B Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113

P Temporary piezometer. MW Piezometer to remain in place. P Temporary piezometer

August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A

In the event of any occurrence that does or could pose a hazard to rail traffic or the public, contact Canadian Pacific Railway at

Summary of Findings. Bridge Inspection and Monitoring. Introduction. Findings

Chapter 6 DOCUMENTATION OF HYDRAULIC STUDIES SOUTH DAKOTA DRAINAGE MANUAL

Georgia Department of Transportation Railroad Coordination Submission Checklist

US Army Corps of Engineers

APPENDIX A DEFINITION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PERMIT

Section 1: Geotechnical Report Manual

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Building Code of New York State

CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Districtwide Storm Sewer Inspection

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PIPELINE AND UTILITY INSTALLATION IN SOIL BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

GEOTECHNICAL RESISTANCE FACTORS

Volume III ARCHITECTURE MAINTENANCE PLAN

2. Does not require, involve or include any additions to, or repair or modification of, the existing foundation.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District Sediment Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan For Maintenance Dredging with Beach Placement

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide

AREA STRUCTURE PLAN PROCESS

LOAD FACTOR RESISTANCE DESIGN

Retaining Wall Design for the Railroad Infrastructure: What Makes Its Design and Construction Unique? A Selection Approach

CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN. 1. Gradation (sieve and hydrometer analysis) 3. Moisture density relationships and curves

Review of agreed-upon procedures engagements questionnaire

SepticDesign.ca Gunnell Engineering Ltd.

1997 Part 2. Document B141. Standard Form of Architect's Services: Design and Contract Administration TABLE OF ARTICLES

Offshore pile acceptance using dynamic pile monitoring

OFFICE OF STATE AID ROAD CONSTRUCTION MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Consultant Specifications for Subsurface Investigation & Geotechnical Analysis and Design Recommendations

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE FOR MAINTENANCE

SAMPLE SPECIFICATION for HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING of DRIVEN PILES

Wastewater Capital Projects Management Standard Construction Specification

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK

The following answers are provided in response to questions received.

CONSTRUCTION SURVEY. Construction survey includes personnel, equipment, and supplies required for, but not limited to, the following:

Chapter A-9 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS NORTH KANSAS CITY - LOWER (HARLEM AREA)

Task Order Authorization

Partial Factors of Safety

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

General Professional Practice Guidelines for Environmental Geoscience

Designing for Longitudinal Force

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Control Survey Procedures

Construction Administration Updates

Descriptive Statistics and Well County Maps

The Afton TSF, situated approximately 12 km west of Kamloops, BC has been under care and maintenance since 1997.

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to:

Excavations and Blind Penetrations into Walls & Floors

CHAPTER 7 - INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE... 2

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES SECTION UTILITY PIPE BORING AND JACKING DIVISION 33 UTILITIES SECTION UTILITY PIPE BORING AND JACKING

SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PIPE JACKING (PJ) October, 2006

Construction Planning, Equipment, and Methods PILES AND PILE-DRIVING EQUIPMENT

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR TRENCHING, BACKFILLING, AND COMPACTING

DESCRIPTION OF THE GOURIKWA POWER STATION & TRANSMISSION INTEGRATION PROJECT CHAPTER 3

Chapter 2 GALP Implementation Assistance

SECTION PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES

Application For Waste Regulation (Check all that apply)

Exercise Tangaroa Evaluation Plan. V1.0 4 February 2016

Design Considerations. Pursuing Dynamic Compaction. waste considered. Pursuing Dynamic Compaction. Page 1 of6

Development of an Efficient Tapered Slip-Form System Applying BIM Technology

PCAT FAQs What are the important PCAT test dates for ? Registration Opens 3/1/2017. o July o September

Compilation Engagements

11.1.2* Adjacent Hazards or Design Methods. For buildings with two or more adjacent hazards or design methods, the following shall apply:

Airport FAP Application Guide v18.0

PROJECT SCOPING PHASE ~ SCOPE OF SERVICES MAIN STREET BRIDGE OVER WINOOSKI RIVER CITIES OF BURLINGTON & WINOOSKI VERMONT

1. Introduction Selection of Pile Type Soil Report / Boreholes Obstructions Design and Installation of Piling Mat 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS PRESSURE FLOW DESIGN (G 300) SECTION NO. SUBJECT DATE

The following sections provide the approved standard infiltration testing specifications.

Coordination of Consultants

Design-Builder Peformance Evaluation (DBPE)

Brewster Transfer Station Traffic Flow Alternatives

Problem Screening Guideline January, 2016

LPI 56 Technical Guide

COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVEN BELLONE SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

SEWRPC Model Zoning Ordinance ZONING REGULATIONS FOR WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Background of Existing Facility 3. Proposed Work 4

Lesson 4 INSPECTOR S ROLE

San Pablo Avenue and Buchanan Street Pedestrian Safety Improvements Project Contract Addendum No. 1 - Sidewalk Reconstruction

SUBDIVISION AND OFF-SITE SERVICING CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Rev 5 May 25, 2017

ODOT Design & Construction Requirements for MSE Walls

SoCalGas ENVOY. Understanding Maintenance Schedules Informational Postings User Guide

Minimum Guidelines for the Design and Use of Underpins When Performing Foundation Stabilization and/or Supplementation UP-08

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Transcription:

Chapter 2 PROJECT COORDINATION PROCESS Final SCDOT GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL August 2008

Table of Contents Section Page 2.1 Introduction...2-1 2.2 Project Initiation...2-1 2.3 Fast Track Projects...2-1 2.4 Normal Track Projects...2-2 2.4.1 Preliminary Exploration...2-2 2.4.2 Right-of-Way Access Permission...2-2 2.4.3 Final Exploration...2-3 August 2008 2-i

List of Figures Figure Page Figure 2-1, Project Initiation Process...2-4 Figure 2-2, Fast Track Project Coordination...2-5 Figure 2-3, Normal Track Project Coordination...2-6 Figure 2-4, Preliminary...2-7 Figure 2-5, Right-of-Way Access Permission...2-8 Figure 2-6, Right-of-Way Access Permission Delay Plan...2-9 Figure 2-7, Final...2-10 Figure 2-8, Final Design...2-11 2-ii August 2008

2.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2 The Design Squads (s) are located within the Regional Production Groups (RPGs). As indicated in Chapter 1, the RPGs consist of program management, road, bridge, hydraulic and utilities engineering in addition to the. By placing the with the other units within the RPG, project coordination is closer with an overall reduction in the lag time between project initiation and project completion and improves communication between the various design elements of a project. 2.2 PROJECT INITIATION projects are initiated upon receipt of the request for surveys and subsurface utilities engineering (SUE). The request for surveys and SUE is typically received from either the Road Design Group or the Design Manager of the RPG. Upon receipt of the initiation documentation, the will gather existing information from the project to include existing soils information, existing road and bridge plans and any preliminary plans depicting the proposed project. After collecting and reviewing this information, the will schedule a Geoscoping trip to document site conditions and fill out a GDF 000 (see Appendix A) either during or immediately after the Geoscoping. During project initiation the Program Manager should provide information concerning whether a project will be Fast Track or Normal Track (see Figure 2-1). Fast Track projects will follow the coordination process depicted in Figure 2-2 and Normal Track projects will follow the coordination process depicted in Figure 2-3. 2.3 FAST TRACK PROJECTS Fast Track projects are typically those projects that have limited or no environmental impacts, require no additional Right-of-Way, have relatively simple structures, and are placed on the same vertical and horizontal alignment as the existing bridge. These types of projects do not have surveys or hydraulic engineering analysis performed. Because survey data is typically not be available all references to depth should be from the existing bridge deck. Elevations are not be used in Fast Track projects. The geotechnical and structural designers are required to make a best estimate on the amount of scour anticipated at the bridge location. This estimate of scour should be based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the bridge site. Unlike a Normal Track, the preparation of a preliminary geotechnical exploration and report is not performed. Instead the will issue a geotechnical advisory that contains the same information as the preliminary geotechnical report, except that the advisory will be based on available soils information from the general area, not the specific project location, unless available. Figure 2-2 provides the project coordination process that will be used for Fast Track projects. All borings should be performed within the existing SCDOT Right-of-Way and should not require the use of difficult access equipment to explore the site. August 2008 2-1

The will receive layout plans from the Program Manager prior to commencing field work on the project. The Structures Design Group will provide anticipated loads for the proposed structure. The will prepare a RGER and a BGER for the project. The reports will be provided to the respective Design Groups. Recommendations contained in the report will be incorporated into the project plans. In addition, the will provide notes to be included on both the road and bridge plans. The will review final bridge and road plans to assure that geotechnical design data were incorporated correctly in the plans. If required, the will prepare Special Provisions in coordination with PCS/. 2.4 NORMAL TRACK PROJECTS As indicated above, the Program Manager will decide whether a project will be Normal or Fast Track. A Normal Track project will follow the coordination process depicted in Figure 2-3. Prior to initiating the preliminary geotechnical exploration, the will compile available geotechnical information from the general area. The information should include, but not be limited to, existing subsurface explorations, pile load test data (static or dynamic) or pile installation records. 2.4.1 Preliminary Exploration Upon completion of Geoscoping, the will prepare a request for a Preliminary in accordance with the guidelines established in Chapter 4 of this Manual (see Figure 2-4). The request will be forwarded to the Materials Engineer of the Office of Materials and Research (OMR). The will receive draft logs from OMR and will select samples for laboratory testing. After the completion of the laboratory testing, the will receive the final soil test boring logs and laboratory testing results. Upon receipt of the final preliminary soil test boring records and laboratory work, the shall prepare a Preliminary Report for both the bridge and road portions of the project. The reports shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 21 of this Manual. The PGERs shall be forwarded to the appropriate Design Groups. In addition, the results of grain-size testing shall be forwarded to the Hydraulic Engineering Group for use in hydraulic design. The preliminary geotechnical exploration and preliminary geotechnical reports should be issued prior to the Design Field Review (DFR). 2.4.2 Right-of-Way Access Permission Immediately prior to the DFR, the will initiate the Right-of-Way (ROW) access permission process (see Figure 2-5), where permission will be obtained from adjacent landowners to access their property for the purpose of performing geotechnical explorations within the proposed new SCDOT Right-of-Way. If permission is obtained, then the will prepare the final geotechnical exploration request and proceed as discussed below. If permission is denied, the will develop a delay plan and discuss the plan with the Program Manager (see Figure 2-6). If the plan is acceptable, the will continue into the final geotechnical exploration. 2-2 August 2008

2.4.3 Final Exploration After the completion of the DFR and receipt of the revised DFR plans, if required, the will prepare a Final request in accordance with the guidelines established in Chapter 4 of this Manual. (See Figures 2-3 and 2-7). This request will be forwarded to OMR, Materials Engineer. The will receive draft logs from OMR and will select samples for laboratory testing. After the completion of the laboratory testing, the will receive the final soil test boring logs and laboratory testing results. The will forward to the Hydraulic Engineering Group any additional subsurface information that has been collected during the final geotechnical exploration that may affect hydraulic design. The will initiate the final geotechnical design upon receipt of the final soil boring logs. Figure 2-8 depicts the Final Design procedure. The will compile all geotechnical information for the project (existing, preliminary and final) for use in the final geotechnical design. The will receive from the bridge and road squad final layouts for all structures and the bridge loading information. The will prepare final bridge (BGER) and road (RGER) geotechnical reports in accordance with Chapter 21 of this Manual. In addition, the will prepare Special Provisions that are required for the project. These Special Provisions will be prepared in coordination with the PCS/. The will review the final plans and specifications to assure that the geotechnical designs have been properly incorporated into the project design. August 2008 2-3

Project Coordination Project Initiation Scoping Trip Normal Track Project Coordination No Fast Track Project? Yes Fast Track Project Coordination Figure 2-1, Project Initiation Process 2-4 August 2008

Fast Track Project Coordination Fast Track Project Coordination Project Manager Provides Road Plans To Sets-up File & Schedules Geoscope Trip Compiles Available Information Issues Advisory Based on Available Information Conducts Geoscope Trip Final Final Design Plans Complete Contract Documents Figure 2-2, Fast Track Project Coordination August 2008 2-5

Normal Track Project Coordination Normal Track Project Coordination Compiles Available Information & Conducts Geoscope Trip Preliminary DFR Plan Preparation Issues Preliminary Report Receives Preliminary DFR Plans ROW Access Permission DFR Project Development Team Reviews DFR Comments Revise DFR Plans? No Yes Revise DFR Plans and Provide To ROW Access Permission Delay Plan No Have ROW Access Permissions Been Obtained? Yes Is Additional Required? Yes No Final Final Design Plans Complete Contract Documents Figure 2-3, Normal Track Project Coordination 2-6 August 2008

Preliminary Reviews Soil Test Boring Logs and Requests Laboratory Testing Preliminary Sets-up File & Schedules Geoscope Trip Conducts Geoscope Trip Requests Research & Materials Lab To Perform Preliminary Subsurface Receives Completed Soil Test Boring Logs and Laboratory Data Transmits Information To Hydraulic Engineering (As Required) Prepares Preliminary Report Receives Draft Soil Test Boring Logs Issues Preliminary Report Figure 2-4, Preliminary August 2008 2-7

Right-of-Way (ROW) Access Permission ROW Access Permission Marks Proposed Boring Locations On Preliminary ROW DFR Plan Sheets Transmits ROW Access Permission Request and Preliminary DFR plans to ROW ROW Contacts Property Owners For ROW Access Permission ROW Updates on Permission Status Have ROW Access Permissions Been Obtained? No ROW Access Permission Delay Plan Yes Final Figure 2-5, Right-of-Way Access Permission 2-8 August 2008

ROW Access Permission Delay Plan ROW Access Permission Delay Plan Develops Alternate Action Plan Contacts Project Manager Action Plan Accepted? Yes No Final Figure 2-6, Right-of-Way Access Permission Delay Plan August 2008 2-9

Final Final Requests Research & Materials Lab To Perform Final Receives Draft Soil Test Boring Logs Reviews Soil Test Boring Logs and Requests Laboratory Testing Receives Completed Soil Test Boring Logs and Laboratory Data Transmits Information To Hydraulic Engineering (As Required) Final Design Figure 2-7, Final 2-10 August 2008

Final Design Final Design Compiles Data (Existing, Preliminary, Final) Prepares Final Report and Specifications Issues Roadway Report (RGER) Issues Bridge Report (BGER) Road Plans Prepared Bridge Plans Prepared Reviews Final Plans Issues Special Provisions Contract Documents Plans Complete Figure 2-8, Final Design August 2008 2-11