PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST. Procedure Element Trial 1 Trial 2

Similar documents
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 715 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

ASPHALT WAQTC WAQTC TM 13 (12)

May 1, 2000 LAB MANUAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY & ABSORPTION of COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO Designation T 85 (Mn/DOT Modified)

Method of Test for Density and Air Voids of Asphalt Concrete by the Marshall Method

TOTAL EVAPORABLE MOISTURE CONTENT OF AGGREGATE BY DRYING FOP FOR AASHTO T 255 (11) Containers, clean, dry and capable of being sealed

METHOD OF MAKING AND CURING CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS IN THE FIELD FOP FOR AASHTO T 23

VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) WAQTC TM 13

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 507 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

MOLDING, TESTING, AND EVALUATING ASPHALT BLACK BASE MATERIALS

DETERMINATION OF WORKABILITY OF FRESH CONCRETE BY SLUMP TEST

SECTION 402 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEVELING

Extraction and Sieve Analysis ( µm minus) Forming Marshall Specimens, Field Method

Asphalt Test Relationships The Devil s In The Details

Tex-239-F, Asphalt Release Agent

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Testing of Concrete Blocks

Determining Asphalt Binder Bond Strength by Means of the Binder Bond Strength (BBS) Test

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

4-07 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base (ATPB)

4.1 DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY

ITEM 340 DENSE-GRADED HOT-MIX ASPHALT (METHOD)

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR SUPERPAVE AND STONE MASTIC ASPHALT MIXTURES

Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) Guide Specification for Highway Construction

2.3. KT-3; Material Passing No. 200 (75µm) Sieve by the Wash Method

Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures 1

SUPERPAVE ASPHALT CONCRETE END PRODUCT SPECIFICATION (EPS)

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. TMMB Printing

Superpave Design Guidelines for Using Hot-Mix Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Recycled Asphalt Shingles

Tex-121-E, Soil-Lime Testing

APPENDIX D ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS/PROBLEMS

Approved Asphalt Quality Control Technician (ODOT Level 2 Asphalt Technician)

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES. C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

Volumetric Analysis-Based Comparison between Superpave and Marshall Mix Design Procedures

SACRAMENTO COUNTY ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX-GAP GRADED (ARHM-GG):

Chapter 1. Department Specifications for Bituminous Mixing Plants for Hot-Mixed, Hot-Laid Paving Mixtures

GYROPAC BULK DENSITY DETERMINATION ISSUES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

METHOD A2 THE DETERMINATION OF THE LIQUID LIMIT OF SOILS BY MEANS OF THE FLOW CURVE METHOD

HCMTCB SOILS CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

2012 Canadian Asphalt Mix Exchange Program Marshall Mix Design Instructions to Participants

OMT Asphalt Plant Inspection Checklist

AUTOMATION OF THE SUPERPAVE MIX DESIGN PROCESS FOR THE WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS. John P. Zaniewski, Ph.D. Martin Padula

A. Texas Department of Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT).

SUPERPAVE FACT SHEET

SPEEDY MOISTURE TEST. Equipment Needed: Complete speedy kit, No. 4 sieve, speedy chart, and sample of soil.

FREEZING AND THAWING TESTS OF COMPACTED SOIL-CEMENT MIXTURE

Regional Engineers. Jack A. Elston

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

HOTMIX! HOT MIX ASPHALT DESIGN EXPERT SYSTEM FINAL REPORT IR September David J. Elton. Lisa Waldroup Dukes

Mixture Aggregate Technician Course

Standard Test Method for Effects of Heat and Air on Asphaltic Materials (Thin-Film Oven Test) 1

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING LABORATORY

Overview. Mix Design with High RAP Contents SEAUPG 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. December 7, 2010

Aggregate for sprayed bituminous surfacing The requirements of AS

1 Testing Equipment. Laboratory General Sampling Sample Reduction Sieve Analysis Decantation Deleterious and Chert

City of Brandon Division 2 Standard Construction Specifications Section January 2000 Page 1 of 10 SOIL CEMENT BASE COURSE PART 1 GENERAL

Hot Mix Testing Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

Asphalt Rubber Chip Sealing DRAFT MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION. March 22, 2007

Scibond SL-23 Polymeric Lubrication System for Tube Drawing

ILLINOIS FLEXIBILITY INDEX TEST PILOT PROJECTS

INDOT/ACPA Technical Committee 2009 Specification Revisions 2009 Test Method Revisions Studies

RUBBERIZED ASPHALT CONCRETE (TYPE G)

DRAFT Guidance Specification for Porous or Dense-Graded Asphalt Pavement Structures for Storm Water Management Revised July 28, 2016

What Do The Sand Testing Numbers Mean

Item 20 ASPHALT PAVEMENT MATERIALS

Photo Courtesy: Chuck Hughes

BIO-AQUIFER STORM SYSTEM

Laboratory 2 Hydrometer Analysis Atterberg Limits Sand Equivalent Test

Standard Test Procedures Manual

THE STRENGTH AND STIFFNESS MODULUS OF THIN LAYER HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURE

FEBRUARY 7, 2018 REINFORCED ASPHALT CONCRETE IAPA ASPHALT RESEARCH. ZACH CREECH SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT EDWARDSVILLE School of Engineering

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. Endorsed by and Affiliated with. TMMB Printing

The Cardiac Arrest of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements

Method of Test for Determining Target Dry Density & In-place Density of Salvaged/Recycled Materials Using the Nuclear Gauge (Test Strip)

Successful Implementation of Warm Mix Asphalt in Ontario

2014 Capital Project Phase 3 Grand Island Central School District Cannon Design Project No SECTION PAVING PART 1 - GENERAL

Mix Design and Pumped Concrete

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GANDHINAGAR Department of Civil Engineering Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Geotech Services, X-18, MIDC, Hingna, Nagpur, Maharashtra. Discipline Mechanical Testing Issue Date

39 HOT MIX ASPHALT, SUPERPAVE

LIQUID PENETRANTS USER S MANUAL in accordance to specifications: EN 571, ASTME 1417, AMS 2644, MIL, ASME, DIN, UNI, BS, AFNOR, etc..

Concrete. Chapter 10 Properties of Fresh Concrete. Materials of Construction-Concrete 1. Wikipedia.org

Standard Practice for Molding Roller-Compacted Concrete in Cylinder Molds Using a Vibrating Hammer 1

Pilot Asphalt Specification Review Technician Duties. November 20 th, 2015 Chris Abadie Materials Engineer Administrator District 61 Conference Room

Establishing Hot Mix Asphalt Mixing and Compaction Temperatures at the Project Level

THERMOFIT ADHESIVE S Flex Fluid Resistant, High Temperature, One Part-Flexible Epoxy

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR LATEX MODIFIED EMULSION TREATMENT (MICRO-SURFACING)

Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method

Laboratory Certification For. National Engineering Services for Rehabilitation of Afghanistan (NESRA)

Laboratory Investigations of the Electrical Resistivity of Cokes and Smelting Charge for Optimizing Operation in Large Ferrochrome Furnaces

Click on image to enlarge.

Research on the Abrasion Erosion and Impact Resistance of Fiber Concrete

INVITATION TO BID ON TOWN PAVING PROJECTS

Special Provision for Hot-Mix Asphalt Prime Coat

METHOD OF TEST FOR FREEZING-AND-THAWING OF COARSE AGGREGATE

MIDLAND COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

Construction Specification for Concrete Unit Pavers

ITEM 6 CONCRETE CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS

8 Testing Equipment. Laboratory General Sampling Sample Reduction Sieve Analysis Decantation Deleterious and Chert

Chipseal Design and Materials. Stephen Van De Bogert Western States Asphalt

Transcription:

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 168 (10) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST SAMPLING BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES FOP FOR AASHTO T 168 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Was sample taken with an attached sampling device correctly? a. Container coated or preheated or both? b. Sampling device passed through stream twice perpendicular to material? c. Sampling device not over filled? 2. Samples from truck transports taken from four quadrants at required depth of 300 mm (12 in)? 3. Samples from roadway taken correctly with plate(s). a. When on untreated base plate placed well in front of paver? b. Wire pulled to locate plate corner? c. Cookie cutter placed on asphalt and pushed through to plate? d. All material removed from inside the cutter? 4. Sample placed in appropriate container. 5. Sample size meets agency requirements? 6. Sample identified as required? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 17_T168_pr_10 Asphalt 3-9 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 168 (10) 17_T168_pr_10 Asphalt 3-10 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 168 (10) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST (ORAL) SAMPLING BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES FOP FOR AASHTO T 168 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. At the hot plant how must a sample be obtained using an attached sampling device? a. Coat or preheat sample container. b. Sampling device passed through stream twice perpendicular to material. c. The sampling device cannot be overfilled. 2. What must be done to sample from transport units? a. Divide the unit into four quadrants. b. Obtain increments from each quadrant, 300 mm (12 in) below surface. 3. Describe how to take samples from the roadway using a plate. a. Place the plate well in front of the paver. b. Pull the wire to locate the corner of the plate. c. Place the cutter on the HMA above the plate and push it down to the plate. d. Collect all the material inside the cutter. 4. What types of containers can be used? a. Cardboard boxes, stainless steel bowls, or other agency approved containers. 5. What dictates size of sample? a. Agency requirements. b. Specified by test method. Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 18_T168_pr_10_oral Asphalt 3-11 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 168 (10) 18_T168_pr_10_oral Asphalt 3-12 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO R 47 (10) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST REDUCING SAMPLES OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) TO TESTING SIZE FOP FOR AASHTO R 47 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Sample made soft enough to separate easily without exceeding temperature limits? Mechanical Splitter Method Type A (Quartermaster) 2. Splitter cleaned and surfaces coated with release agent? 3. Hopper closed and receptacles in place? 4. Sample placed into hopper without segregation or loss of material? 5. Hopper handle released allowing the HMA to uniformly flow into receptacles? 6. Splitter surfaces cleaned of all retained HMA, allowing it to fall into appropriate receptacles? 7. Further reduction with the quartermaster: a. Material in receptacles from opposite corners combined? b. Splitting process repeated until appropriate sample size is obtained? 8. Remaining HMA stored in suitable container and properly labeled? Mechanical Splitter Method Type B (Riffle) 9. Splitting apparatus and tools, if preheated, not exceeding 110ºC (230ºF)? 10. Splitter cleaned and surfaces coated with release agent? 11. Two empty receptacles placed under splitter? 12. Sample placed in hopper or straight edged pan without loss of material and uniformly distributed from side to side? 13. Material discharged across chute assembly at controlled rate allowing free flow of HMA through chutes? 14. Splitter surfaces cleaned of all retained HMA allowing it to fall into appropriate receptacles? OVER 21_R47_pr_10 Asphalt 4-13 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO R 47 (10) 15. Further reduction with the riffle splitter: a. Material from one receptacle discharged across chute assembly at controlled rate, allowing free flow of HMA through chutes? b. Splitting process continued until appropriate sample size obtained, with splitter surfaces cleaned of all retained HMA after every split? 16. Remaining unused HMA stored in suitable container, properly labeled? Quartering Method 17. Testing equipment preheated to a temperature not to exceed mix temperature? 18. Sample placed in a conical pile on a hard, non-stick, heat-resistant splitting surface such as metal or sheeting? 19. Sample mixed by turning the entire sample over a minimum of 4 times? 20. Conical pile formed and then flattened uniformly to diameter equal to about 4 to 8 times thickness? 21. Sample divided into 4 equal portions either with a metal quartering template or straightedges such as drywall taping knives? 22. Reduction by Full Quartering: a. Two diagonally opposite quarters removed and returned to sample container? b. Two other diagonally opposite quarters combined and process continued until appropriate sample size has been achieved? 23. Reduction by Apex: a. Using two straightedges or a splitting device and one straightedge, was one of the quarters split from apex to outer edge of material? b. Similar amount of material taken from opposite quarter? c. Increments combined to produce appropriate sample size? 24. Remaining unused HMA stored in suitable container, properly labeled? Incremental Method 25. Sample placed on hard, non-stick, heat-resistant splitting surface covered with sheeting? 26. Sample mixed by turning the entire sample over a minimum of 4 times? OVER 21_R47_pr_10 Asphalt 4-14 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO R 47 (10) 27. Conical pile formed? 28. HMA rolled into loaf and then flattened? 29. The first quarter of the loaf removed by slicing off or dropping off edge of counter and set aside? 30. Proper sample size sliced off or dropped off edge of counter into sample container? 31. Process continued until all samples are obtained? 32. All remaining unused HMA stored in suitable container, properly labeled? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 21_R47_pr_10 Asphalt 4-15 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO R 47 (10) 21_R47_pr_10 Asphalt 4-16 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 329 (09) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST MOISTURE CONTENT OF ASPHALT MIXTURES BY OVEN METHOD FOP FOR AASHTO T 329 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Mass of clean dry container including release media determined to 0.1 g? 2. Representative sample obtained; 1000 g minimum? 3. Initial temperature taken and recorded? 4. Mass of sample determined to 0.1 g? 5. Sample placed in drying oven for 90 ±5 minutes? 6. Sample dried at a temperature not to exceed the JMF mixing temp? 7. Constant mass checked at 30 ±5 minute intervals and reached? 8. Sample and container cooled to ±9 C (15 F) of the initial temperature before final mass determined to 0.1 g? 9. Calculation of moisture content performed correctly to 0.01 percent? MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM CCCCCCCCCCCCCC = MM ii MM ff MM ff 100 Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 24_T329_pr_09 Asphalt 5-7 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 329 (09) 24_T329_pr_09 Asphalt 5-8 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 308 (16) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST DETERMINING THE ASPHALT BINDER CONTENT OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) BY THE IGNITION METHOD FOP FOR AASHTO T 308 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Oven at correct temperature 538 ± 5 C (1000 ± 9 F) or correction factor temperature? Or: for IR ovens, correct burn profile applied? 2. Sample reduced to correct size? 3. HMA sample or companion moisture sample taken and dried per FOP for AASHTO T 329? 4. Mass of sample basket assembly recorded to 0.1 g? 5. With pan below basket(s) sample evenly distributed in basket(s)? 6. Sample conforms to the required mass and mass recorded to 0.1 g? 7. Method A a. Initial mass entered into furnace controller? b. Sample correctly placed into furnace? c. Test continued until stable indicator signals? d. Uncorrected asphalt binder content obtained on printed ticket? e. Sample mass determined to nearest 0.1 g.? 8. Method B a. Sample correctly placed into furnace? b. Sample burned for 45 min or time determined by correction process? c. Sample cooled to room temperature? d. Sample burned to constant mass? e. Sample mass determined to nearest 0.1 g.? f. Uncorrected asphalt binder content calculated correctly and recorded? OVER 27_T308_pr_16 Asphalt 6-19 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 308 (16) 9. Asphalt binder content corrected for Correction Factor if needed? 10. Asphalt binder content corrected for moisture per the FOP for AASHTO T 329 if needed? 11. Corrected asphalt binder content recorded? 12. Contents of the basket(s) carefully emptied into a pan? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 27_T308_pr_16 Asphalt 6-20 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 209 (16) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND DENSITY OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) PAVING MIXTURES FOP FOR AASHTO T 209 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Sample reduced to correct size? 2. Particles carefully separated insuring that aggregate is not fractured? 3. After separation, fine aggregate particles not larger than 6.3 mm (1/4 in.)? 4. Sample at room temperature? 5. Mass of container determined to 0.1 g? 6. Mass of sample and container determined to 0.1 g? 7. Mass of sample calculated and conforms to required size? 8. Water at approximately 25 C (77 F) added to cover sample? 9. Entrapped air removed using partial vacuum for 15 ±2 min? 10. Container and contents agitated continuously by mechanical device or manually by vigorous shaking at intervals of about 2 minutes? 11. Bowl determination: a. Water bath filled to the overflow level? b. Bowl and contents suspended in water at 25 ±1 C (77 ±2 F) for 10 ±1 minutes? c. Submerged weight of bowl and contents determined to 0.1 g? d. Submerged weight of empty bowl determined to 0.1 g? e. Net submerged weight of contents calculated? 12. Pycnometer / Volumetric Flask determination: a. Pycnometer / volumetric flask filled with water without reintroducing air into the sample? b. Contents stabilized at 25 ±1 C (77 ±2 F) c. Pycnometer / volumetric flask completely filled with water that is 25 ±1 C (77 ±2 F)? OVER 30_T209_pr_16 Asphalt 7-11 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 209 (16) d. Mass of filled pycnometer / volumetric flask and cover determined to 0.1 g, 10 ±1 minutes after removal of entrapped air completed? e. Mass of pycnometer / volumetric flask, cover, and water obtained from the Standardization of Pycnometer or Volumetric Flask procedure? 13. G mm calculated correctly and reported to 0.001? 14. Density calculated correctly and reported to 1 kg/m 3 (0.1 lb/ft 3 )? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 30_T209_pr_16 Asphalt 7-12 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 166 (13) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COMPACTED ASPHALT MIXTURES USING SATURATED SURFACE-DRY SPECIMENS FOP FOR AASHTO T 166 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. Method A: 1. Mass of dry sample in air determined. a. Dried overnight at 52 ±3 C (125 ±5 F) and at successive 2-hour intervals to constant mass? b. Cooled in air to 25 ±5 C (77 ±9 F)? c. Dry mass determined to 0.1g? 2. Water at the overflow? 3. Balance zeroed? 4. Immersed weight determined. a. Water at 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F)? b. Immersed, shaken, on side, for 4 ±1 minutes? c. Immersed weight determined to 0.1g? 5. Sample rapidly surface dried with damp towel and saturated surface dry (SSD) mass determined to 0.1 g (entire operation performed within 15 seconds)? 6. G mb calculated to 0.001? 7. Absorption calculated to 0.01 percent Method B: 1. Specimen dried, cooled, and mass determined as in Method A? 2. Saturated surface dry (SSD) mass determined to 0.1g. a. Immersed at least 10 minutes at 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F)? b. Sample rapidly dried with damp towel? c. Specimen mass determined to 0.1 g? d. Any water that seeps from specimen included in mass? 3. Mass of volumeter filled with distilled water at 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F) determined? 4. SSD specimen placed into volumeter and let stand for 1 minute? OVER 33_T166_pr_13 Asphalt 8-15 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 166 (13) 5. Temperature of water brought to 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F) and volumeter covered, allowing some water to escape through the capillary bore of the tapered lid? 6. Volumeter wiped dry, and mass of volumeter and contents determined? 7. G mb calculated to 0.001? 8. Absorption calculated to 0.01 percent? Method C/A: 1. Immersed weight determined. a. Water at 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F)? b. Immersed, shaken, on side, for 4 ±1 minutes? c. Immersed weight determined to 0.1 g? 2. Sample rapidly surface dried with damp cloth (within 5 seconds)? 3. Saturated surface dry mass determined to 0.1 g? 4. Dry mass determined by: a. Heating in oven at a minimum of 105 C (221 F)? b. Breaking down to 6.3 mm (¼ in.) particles? c. Drying in oven to constant mass (change less than 0.05 percent in 2 hours of additional drying)? d. Cooled in air to 25 ±5 C (77 ±9 F) and mass determined to 0.1 g? 5. G mb calculated to 0.001? 6. Absorption calculated to 0.01? Method C/B: 1. Saturated surface dry (SSD) mass determined to 0.1g. a. Immersed at least 10 minutes at 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F)? b. Sample rapidly dried with damp towel (within 5 seconds)? c. Specimen mass determined to 0.1g? d. Any water that seeps from specimen included in mass? 2. Mass of volumeter filled with distilled water at 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F) determined to 0.1 g? 3. SSD specimen placed into volumeter and let stand for 1 minute? 4. Temperature of water brought to 25 ±1 C (77 ±1.8 F) and volumeter covered, allowing some water to escape through the capillary pore of the tapered lid? 5. Volumeter wiped dry, and mass of volumeter and contents determined to 0.1 g? OVER 33_T166_pr_13 Asphalt 8-16 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 166 (13) 6. Dry mass determined by: a. Warming in oven at a minimum of 105 C (221 F)? b. Breaking down to 6.3 mm (¼ in.) particles? c. Drying in oven to constant mass (change less than 0.05 percent in 2 hours of additional drying)? d. Cooled in air to 25 ±5 C (77 ±9 F) and mass determined to 0.1 g? 7. G mb calculated to 0.001? 8. Absorption calculated to 0.01 percent? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 33_T166_pr_13 Asphalt 8-17 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 166 (13) 33_T166_pr_13 Asphalt 8-18 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 30 (17) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTED AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 30 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Total dry mass determined to 0.1 g 2. Dry mass agrees with sample mass after ignition (M f ) from AASHTO T 308 within 0.1 percent? 3. Sample placed in container and covered with water? 4. Wetting agent added? 5. Contents of container agitated vigorously? 6. Wash water poured through proper nest of two sieves? 7. Washing continued until wash water is clear and no wetting agent remaining? 8. Retained material returned to washed sample? 9. Washed material coarser than 75 µm (No. 200) dried to constant mass at 110 ±5 C (230 ±9 F)? 10. Sample cooled to room temperature? 11. Dry mass after washing determined to 0.1 g? 12. Material sieved on specified sieves? 13. Mass of each fraction of aggregate, including minus 75 µm (No. 200), determined and recorded to 0.1 g? 14. Total mass of material after sieving agrees with mass before sieving to within 0.2 percent? 15. Percent passing each sieve determined correctly to the nearest 0.1 percent? 16. Aggregate correction factor applied? 17. Percent passing on each sieve reported correctly to the nearest 1 percent and nearest 0.1 percent on the 75 µm (No. 200)? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 38_T30_pr_17 Asphalt 10-15 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 30 (17) 38_T30_pr_17 Asphalt 10-16 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT II WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 312 (16) PERFORMANCE EXAM CHECKLIST GYRATORY COMPACTION OF ASPHALT MIXTURES FOP FOR AASHTO T 312 Participant Name Exam Date Record the symbols P for passing or F for failing on each step of the checklist. 1. Angle, pressure and number of gyrations set? 2. Bearing surfaces, rotating base surface, and rollers lubricated? 3. Representative sample obtained according to the FOP for AASHTO T 168? 4. Sample reduced according to FOP AASHTO R 47? 5. Asphalt mixture heated to compaction temperature range? 6. Mold, base plate, and upper plate heated to compaction temperature range? 7. Mold, base plate, and upper plate (if required) removed from oven and paper disk placed on bottom of mold? 8. Mix placed into mold in one lift without segregation? 9. Paper disk placed on top of the asphalt mixture? 10. Mold placed into compactor and upper plate clamped into place? 11. Pressure applied at 600 kpa ±18 kpa? 12. Specified number of gyrations applied? 13. Proper angle confirmed from display? 14. Compacted specimen removed from mold, paper disc(s) removed, and allowed to cool to room temperature? 15. Asphalt mixture sample measured to a height of 115 ±5 mm at required gyrations? Comments: First attempt: Pass Fail Second attempt: Pass Fail Examiner Signature WAQTC #: 41_T312_pr_16 Asphalt II 11-9 Pub. October 2017

ASPHALT II WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 312 (16) 41_T312_pr_16 Asphalt II 11-10 Pub. October 2017