PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPERATE DAIRY PASTURES AND MILK PRODUCTION IN SOUTH EASTERN AUSTRALIA

Similar documents
Water use efficiency of forages on subtropical dairy farms

Magnesium supplementation of the dairy herd: a case study in Northland and a comparison of two magnesium fertilisers; kieserite and magnesium oxide

Guidelines and tools to get the most from grazing in Ireland

Nutrient budgeting worksheets

NITROGEN BALANCES IN HIGH RAINFALL, TEMPERATE DAIRY PASTURES OF SOUTH EASTERN AUSTRALIA. Abstract

Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists

Section 1 : Identification sheet

Feed wedges (1-14) Introduction. An example of a feed wedge

Nutrient Budgeting. An Overview of What, How and Why. June 2014

Survey of management practices of dairy cows grazing kale in Canterbury

Implications of changing a Friesian dairy system to a Friesian- Jersey crossbred dairy system

Modelling the impact of surplus pasture management techniques on production and profit in a pasture-based dairy system

Comparison of Dairy Farming Systems: A Case Study of Indoor Feeding versus Pasture-based Feeding

Fertiliser evenness losses and costs: A study on the economic benefits of uniform applications of fertiliser

3 Assessing your pasture

C a s e St u d y: Nitrogen Cycling on

The Dairy Nitrogen Fertiliser Advisor - a tool to predict optimal N application rates in grazed dairy pastures

Longitudinal analysis of dairy farm income and expenditure in New Zealand: A review of 25 years of adjustment. ABSTRACT

IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER UREA. ON PASTURE WITH ONEsystem

Innovative and sustainable systems combining automatic milking and precision grazing Dr. Bernadette O Brien

Feed Use in the NZ Dairy Industry

Managing potassium in dairy pastures

The Dairy Carbon Navigator

EFFICIENT BEEF PRODUCTION FROM GRAZED PASTURE

Effects of grazing method and fertiliser inputs on the productivity and sustainability of phalaris-based pastures in Western Victoria

Feeding to manage animal stress and maintain as much condition as possible is critical in a heavy snow situation.

A model of the New Zealand beef value chain: evaluating opportunities

Extending the Grazing Season for Beef Cattle

3. PASTURE-BASED PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Managing Dairy Effluent Ponds Profitably

Liveweight gain per head and per ha throughout the year of lambs grazing conventional pastures and those that switch from grass to clover

Managing Soil Fertility: Targets to maximise production. Dr David P. Wall Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Co Wexford

DLF Forages SEED YOUR EXPECTATIONS. Product Guide. Grasshancer TM

DairySA. Dairy Farm Monitor Project. South Australia Annual Report 2012/13

Determining the costs and revenues for dairy cattle

Your guide to weed control in new pasture

Forecasting fertiliser requirements of forage brassica crops

Grasslands Legacy a new, large-leaved white clover cultivar with broad adaption

A CALCULATOR FOR ESTIMATING THE PROFITABILITY OF IRRIGATION ON NEW ZEALAND DAIRY FARMS

Performance of Makhangrass (Lolium multiflorum) under Various Seed Rate in South East Rajasthan, India

The Effective Fibre Source for Livestock

Using a Grazing Stick for Pasture Management

Impact of irrigation on pasture production on two sheep and beef farms in the Central Wairarapa

Tasmanian Pasture Guide. Our business is growing yours

The FARMnor Model Environmental assessment of Norwegian agriculture

TARGET Performance Pasture Seed Blends

Forage Production, Utilization and Environmental Conservation in Sweden

Setting Weight-for-Age Targets

THE PROFITABILITY OF SEASONAL MOUNTAIN DAIRY FARMING IN NORWAY

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

Spring Survival Guide

Growing cattle fast on pasture

NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS BALANCES AND EFFICIENCIES ON CONTRASTING DAIRY FARMS IN AUSTRALIA

Bermudagrass is a valuable forage for many livestock

Beef Cattle Handbook

Outline of the presentation

MONTHLY HERD SUMMARY REPORT

Estimating Forage Need. Estimating Forage Need. Basic Grazing Numbers. Dr. Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Specialist Univ.

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Herbage production from five grazable forages

Analysis of chicken litter

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

Dairy Cattle Backgrou d I for atio

IMPROVING NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR DAIRY FACTORY WASTEWATER LAND TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Agricultural Science Project

Lincoln University Dairy Farm Farm Walk Notes Tuesday 2nd July 2013

Dairy Farm Monitor Project

S.J. GIBBS 1, B. SALDIAS 1, J. WHITE 2, D. WALSH 2, N. STOCKER 2, C. TROTTER 3, B. FISHER 4, A. FISHER 4, B. BANKS 4 and S.

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

A comparison of the intake of cows grazing swedes and kale and consequent condition score change.

Potential for land use change to dairy in Southland, New Zealand: Impact on profitability and emissions to air and water

A SELECTION INDEX FOR ONTARIO DAIRY ORGANIC FARMS

DAIRY SOIL NUTRIENTS: MONITORING SOIL FERTILITY ON FLEURIEU DAIRY FARMS 2010/11

Dairy Production and Management Benchmarks

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

INFORMATION GUIDE ON REGENERATIVE PRACTICES

MANAGEMENT OF GRAZED DAIRY PASTURE TO MINIMISE IMPACTS ON LAKE WATER QUALITY

Managing Soil Fertility. Teagasc Soil Fertility Management Spring 2015

PALMERSTON NORTH WORKBOOK THURSDAY 11 MAY 9.30AM-3PM MASSEY UNIVERSITY NO 4 DAIRY FARM TENNENT DRIVE PALMERSTON NORTH W I T H D A I RY N Z

Seeding Mixes for Pastures

The importance of Water and Fibre

Contents. In this pack you will find: Contents page (version 1. Mar2017) Non-GMO Project Proof Points (version 1. Mar2017)

Massey University Organic-Conventional Dairy Systems Trial: Report after the seventh season of full certification

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A REPRESENTATIVE DAIRY FARM WITH LIMITED IRRIGATION PASTURES

Impact of Organic farming on aquatic environment

GROUND KAFIR AS A FEED FOR DAIRY COWS¹

Potash for Silage. Contents

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

IN THE NEWSLETTER THIS MONTH. Macalister Demonstration Farm Future Directions

Grazing in Europe 2010

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES OF MANAGEMENT OF ELEPHANTGRASS ON PASTURE AVAILABILITY AND MILK YIELD OF CROSSBRED HOLSTEIN X ZEBU COWS.

Dairy Farm Monitor Project

The benefits of getting Soil Fertility Right

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Diet Check a tactical decision support tool for feeding decisions with grazing dairy cows

Fertilizer and Lime Project Final Report Increasing the magnesium concentration of tall fescue leaves with phosphorus and boron fertilization

The value of grass. Dr Mary McEvoy Germinal Ireland, Horse & Jockey, Thurles, Co. Tipperary Presentation 00/00/2014

FARMFEED LIMITED. Adding value to Zambian crops through livestock SOME OF THE BASICS FOR DAIRY FARMING IN ZAMBIA

Comparison of milk production from clover-based and fertilizer-n-based grassland on a clay-loam soil under moist temperate climatic conditions

Transcription:

PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPERATE DAIRY PASTURES AND MILK PRODUCTION IN SOUTH EASTERN AUSTRALIA ID # 04-10 C.J.P. Gourley, I.Awty, M. O Doherty, and S.R. Aarons Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Hazeldean Rd, Ellinbank, Victoria 3821, Australia. Abstract Phosphorus (P) fertilizer is required to sustain productive pastures in Australia, yet optimum P fertility is poorly defined. A large farmlet study involving 10 herds was established in 1995 to determine the relationship between milk production and pasture response to four different P fertilizer rates, at three stocking rates. Pasture growth significantly increased with increasing P fertilizer rate. Cumulative milk production from pasture over 4 years, was significantly affected by P fertilizer, but responses diminished with increasing P rate. The results from this study will enable a better targeting of P fertility levels for profitable milk production from temperate dairy pastures and minimise the environmental impact of excess P fertilizer use. Keywords: Pasture growth, farmlet study, stocking rates, Olsen P. Introduction Phosphorus fertilizer use is well-entrenched in pasture based dairy systems in Australia. Despite this, the direct link between P fertilizer and milk production is poorly defined and recommendations have been largely based on results from ungrazed pasture plots (Sparrow

1993). Over the past decade, increasing stocking rates and pasture utilisation, have been used to justify increases in P fertilizer recommendations. Recent studies highlighting the links between P fertilizer applications and losses from dairy pastures (Nash and Halliwell, 1999) make it essential that current and future P fertilizer practices are based on scientifically sound information. Material and Methods The study was located at Agriculture Victoria Ellinbank in West Gippsland Victoria (38 o 15 S; 145 o 93 E; mean annual rainfall of 1100 mm). The farmlet study involved 10 dairy herds of 15 cows, in an incomplete factorial design, with 3 stocking rates of 2 (L), 3 (M) and 4 (H) cows/ha, and 4 phosphorus fertilizer rates of 0 (1), 35 (2), 70 (3), and 140 (4) kg P/ha/year. Two of the treatment combinations, M2 and M4, were replicated twice. Each farmlet contained 13 paddocks of uniform area, with total areas of 7.5, 5 or 3.9 ha, corresponding to the 3 different stocking rates. Basal applications of 44 kg sulphur/ha/year and 30-60 kg potassium/ha/year were applied to all pastures with P fertilizer in autumn and spring. The soil type was a well-drained red clay loam (ferrasol). The permanent pasture consisted of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L)(>60%) in association with white clover (Trifolium repens L), annual grasses and broadleaf weeds. Cows were initially allocated to herds in June 1995, and at the end of each lactation 3 heifers replaced cull cows. Each of the 4 lactation periods were between July and May, with cows staying in their respective paddocks during their dry period. At the beginning of each lactation, a projected milk production curve for each herd was calculated, based on a yield of 180 kg milk fat per cow and accounting for the calving pattern. Milk production from each herd was measured twice daily. Supplementary feed requirements was determined by assessing current milk production against the projected production curve. Conserved fodder, and brought in hay and

barley, was fed when production fell below the projected curve. Pasture mass (kg DM/ha) was determined weekly in all paddocks and growth rates (PGR kg DM/ha/day) calculated. Pastures were grazed from approx. 2200 to 1350 kg DM/ha. Pasture in excess of cow demand was conserved as silage and fed back to corresponding herds. Soils were sampled to 10 cm from all 130 paddocks in April of each year and P fertility measured using the Olsen P test (Olsen et al. 1954). Results and Discussion Phosphorus fertility and pasture production. The average initial Olsen P values of all farmlets in 1994 was 13 mg/kg. The addition of P fertilizer at 70 and 140 kg P/ha/year to the M3, H3, M4, H4 farmlets increased the P fertility over 4 years to 20 and 30 mg/kg, respectively. The farmlets receiving 35 kg P/ha/year (L2, M2) maintained their initial fertility and those receiving 0 kg P/ha (L1, M1) declined to 7 mg/kg (Table 1). The high P sorption capacity of the soil clearly impacted on the rate of change in P fertility. Even after 560 kg P/ha had been applied over 4 years (M4,H4), the Olsen P value had only changed from 13 to 30 mg/kg. Increasing P fertilizer rates significantly (P<0.05) increased pasture growth rates (Table 1). At a uniform stocking rate of 3 cows/ha, the difference in pasture growth rates between the 0 and 140 kg P/ha/year farmlets increased from 8% in 1995-6 to 16% in 1998-9. Stocking rate had little effect on pasture growth rates or P fertility. The dry season in 1997-8 resulted in lower pasture growth rates across all farmlets (Table 1) but an increase in the relative growth rate difference between P fertilizer treatments. Work by Singh et al. (1999) on the same site during this dry period highlighted the improved performance of white clover when high P fertilizer rates were applied and this effect is likely to be influencing overall pasture performance. Milk production. All herds had similar annual milk yields, producing around 74,000

L/herd/year. Milk production/ha was therefore related to stocking rate, with herds averaging 10,000, 15,000 and 19,000 L/ha, for the 3 stocking rates, respectively. When milk production from brought in supplements was accounted for, there was a significant effect of P fertilizer rate (P<0.05) on milk produced from pasture (L/ha) over the 4 years (Figure 1). However, the milk production response diminished with increasing P fertilizer additions. The response to P fertilizer was greatest between 0 and 35 kg P/ha and this effect increased each year. Milk production gains from increasing the P fertilizer rate from 35 to 70 or 140, (corresponding to Olsen P values of 13, 20 and 30 mg/kg respectively), were not significantly different (P>0.05), although a positive trend is apparent with increasing years. These results are in contrast to reports from previous New Zealand farmlet studies which suggested increasing P rates up to 100 kg P/ha/year and Olsen P values in excess of 50 mg/kg, were economically justified (Thomson et al., 1993). However, these conclusions were based on the last year of the 3 year study, and when differences between soil sampling depth, lactation lengths, and the inclusion of all years data are accounted for, the results appear similar. Given the financial costs and environmental implications of applying excess P fertilizer rates, it is important that dairy farmers optimise the P fertility of their farms. The results from this study have quantified the benefits of P fertilizer on milk production and will enable farmers and advisers to target soil P fertility for optimum milk production. References Nash, D.M. and Halliwell D.J. (1999). Fertilizer and phosphorus losses from productive grazing systems. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 37: 403-29 Olsen, S.R, Cole C.V., Watanabe F.S and Dean L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular No. 939. United States

Department of Agriculture. Singh, D.K., Sale P.W.G, Gourley C.J.P and Hasthorpe C. (1999). High phosphorus supply increases persistence and growth of white clover in grazed dairy pastures during dry summer conditions. Australian J. Experimental Agriculture 39:579-85. Sparrow, L.A. (1993). Fertilizer advice in Australia. Proceedings of the 1st National Workshop on Soil and Plant Analysis. (Ed. D.R. Baigent). Australian Soil and Plant Analyses Council. pp. J.1 20. Thomson, N.A., Roberts A.H.C., McCallum A., Judd T.G. and Johnson R.J. (1993). How much fertilizer is enough? Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand, June 1993.

Table 1 - Average Olsen P soil test values (OP, mg/kg) and pasture growth rates (PRG, kg DM/ha/day) across all paddocks in each farmlet between 1995 and 1999. Farmlet and treatment 1995-6 1996-7 1997-8 1998-9 OP 1 PGR OP PG OP PG OP PG L1 (2 cows; 0 kg P/ha/year) 6 25 10 17 9 23 7 23 L2 (2 cows; 35 kg P/ha/year) 8 28 14 19 12 28 13 25 M1 (3 cows; 0 kg P/ha/year) 7 25 12 18 10 23 8 25 M2 (3 cows; 35 kg P/ha/year) 3 9 26 13 20 11 25 14 27 M3 (3 cows; 70 kg P/ha/year) 10 27 15 22 16 28 20 27 M4 (3 cows; 140 kg P/ha/year) 3 12 27 24 22 24 28 30 29 H3 (4 cows; 70 kg P/ha/year) 10 26 18 22 17 28 20 29 H4 (4 cows; 140 kg P/ha/year) 13 27 23 23 25 27 29 30 1. Average for all 13 paddocks in each farmlet measured in April of each year 2. Pasture growth rates determined weekly in ungrazed paddocks in each farmlet 3. Results are means of replicate farmlets

Figure 1 - The cumulative effect of P fertilizer application and stocking rate on milk production between 1995 and 1999. Error bars are 95% least significant intervals (LSIs) for comparing treatment means. LSIs are defined such that intervals overlap when differences are not significant.