Sunrise Project South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project

Similar documents
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail Corridor Amtrak Cascades Passenger Service Update

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK

HIGHWAY 14 NEW ULM TO NICOLLET 4-Lane Expansion Open House

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNTY OF KANE

Route 7 Corridor Improvements Project Reston Avenue to Jarrett Valley Drive Public Hearing

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

MEMORANDUM EXAMPLES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES NEXT STEPS. Item 3 Long-Range Plan Task Force May 17, 2017

Chapter 2: Alternatives

EAST COAST ROAD, TAMIL NADU, INDIA. Case Study (Transportation) Project Summary:

A long-term, comprehensive solution

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

Maine Turnpike Needs Assessment

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

National Capital Region Congestion Report

National Governors Association

407 TRANSITWAY. Planning & Preliminary Design

Transit Service Guidelines

Guidelines for TxDOT Regional Toll Road Authority. Cooperation AND. Coordination

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

PPTA Project Pipeline

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

Niagara Region Transportation Master Plan Niagara-Hamilton Trade Corridor Technical Paper

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

7. Value Management Workshop

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

CUY-90-Innerbelt ODOT PID No 77510

Appendix J RFP No (Addendum No. 1)

Re: EX8.12 F.G. Gardiner Expressway Strategic Rehabilitation Plan Procurement Strategy

Sabbir Saiyed, PhD., P.Eng. Manager, Transportation System Planning

1.1 Purpose of the Project

Working with Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas

Members of the Board of Directors. Laurena Weinert, Clerk of the Board

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Safety. Introduction. Total System

Cost Estimating Guideline February, 2017

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

I-70 East ROD 1: Phase 1 (Central 70 Project) Air Quality Conformity Technical Report

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

Exclusive Facilities for Trucks in Florida: An Investigation of the Potential for Reserved Truck Lanes and Truckways on the State Highway System

IPSWICH NORTHERN ROUTES STUDY. Stage 1 Progress

EXHIBIT A. TRANSIT AND MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CONTINUING SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES FM No

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Report to the Finance Committee Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Prepared by the Office of Finance April 2016

Future System Planning (ST4)

Transportation Workshop. FORA Staff 9/8/17

The Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

Business Plan for FY14 FY15

Regional Transportation Studies Regional Council

KNOXVILLE REGIONAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY

PERSPECTIVES ON THE FAST ACT

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING EDITION

GO RAIL NIAGARA SERVICE EXTENSION

Jim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

APPROVAL TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON I-45 AND MORE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Challenges for CBD Freight in Sydney s Transformation. Michael Stokoe 11 October 2016

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

TransAction Plan Draft for Public Comment Spring/Summer 2017

Greater Newcastle Transport Plan

Caltrain Fare Study Update

Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004)

Bonnie Doon Grade Separation

Loudoun County Chamber of Commerce

DEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN OF A NEW PARKWAY AT GRADE INTERSECTION (PAGI)

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and the Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Utah s Most Critical Surface Transportation Projects to Support Economic Growth and Quality of Life. March Washington, DC

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Public-Private-Partnerships

PLAN 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Final Recommendations. Transportation and Air Quality Committee March 13, 2014

SEARs project justification and conclusion

SR 99 Incident Response After- Action Plan

Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Feasibility Study. Design Considerations

OKI Board of Directors. Presentation Ten June 2012

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

LAFAYETTE RAILROAD RELOCATION, NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORRIDOR

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

Request for Information from the Florida Dept. of Transportation

This page intentionally left blank.

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Attachment A: TransformTO Short-term Strategies

City of Brantford Chapter 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Transcription:

Sunrise Project South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project January 24, 2007

Sunrise and I-205 Project Summary Conclusions Sunrise Scoping Study Key Results South I-205 Scoping Study Key Results South I-205 Next Steps and Considerations Page 2

Sunrise and I-205 Project: OTIG Report The purpose of Milestone Zero - the Scoping Study - is to Establish the preliminary feasibility of the Projects as Public Private Partnerships Identify major issues that must be addressed Provide a basis for agreement between ODOT and OTIG on key development parameters for the Project Determine whether OTIG and ODOT should move to Milestone One Milestone Zero is the first step in the series of the following milestones Milestone One: Commercial and Financial Viability Assessment establishment of the commercial and financial viability of the Project in greater detail Milestone Two: Implementation Development development of the Implementation Agreement and the procurement approach for the Design-Build and financing elements of the Project Milestone Three: Closing negotiation and finalization of the Implementation Agreement, Design- Build and Operations procurement process, and Financial Plan elements leading to commercial and Financial Close OTIG & ODOT have the ability to take an off-ramp at completion of any of the milestones, at which point all work product produced by OTIG becomes the property of ODOT 3

Sunrise and I-205 Project: Summary Conclusions Summary Conclusions - Sunrise Both Sunrise Project and Sunrise Corridor are: 1. Needed due to continued strong growth in travel demand and significant congestion 2. Not self-supporting through tolls but could be viable as a shadow tolling PPP should alternative supplemental sources of funding be identified OTIG s understanding is that external funds are unavailable to support the project The project could be coupled with other potential toll projects in the greater Portland metropolitan region that could potentially generate excess revenue ODOT and OTIG have jointly elected to take the off-ramp at Milestone 0 4

Sunrise and I-205 Project: Summary Conclusions Summary Conclusions I-205 1. Improvements to the I-205 Corridor are needed now Current congestion and strong traffic growth forecast 2. Growing public support for the use of tolling Emerging belief that there is a lack of conventional funding and growing acceptance of limited use of tolling 3. The Project can be delivered as a PPP Construction could commence as early as April 2009 4. The Project could be self-supporting Surplus funding could be used for long-needed capital projects and/or transit goals 5. Use of electronic tolling is key to ensuring public support Interoperability, customer service centers and violations enforcement must be addressed 5

Sunrise and I-205 Project: Public Acceptance Note on Public Acceptance The stakeholders and highway users in both project areas are relatively familiar with the need for transportation improvements in the area and are generally supportive of using tolling on a case-by-case basis Most people believe a PPP approach is worth considering as there is a general perception that private sector can do it faster and for lower cost There is a definite need for further education of the residential and business communities and local governments about the partnerships, tolls, and what the project would mean for individual users as well as the general community Use of modern, non-stop electronic toll collection is essential to gaining public support 6

Sunrise Project 7

Sunrise Project: The Issue OR 212/224 is one of the main routes in the Portland area experiencing unacceptable levels of congestion and delay Employment to nearly double by 2015 - forecast to experience continued strong traffic growth and further congestion OR 212/223 near I-205 ranked in the top 10% of state routes for vehicle accident rates Critical freight hub for local and regional industry Lack of sufficient funding at present and in foreseeable future 8

Sunrise Project: Alternatives OTIG examined 6 alternatives differing in the type of tolling utilized, length (Sunrise Project vs. both Sunrise Project and Parkway), and the inclusion of the interchange at 122 nd Ave Option Option 1a Sunrise Project Option 1b Sunrise Project Option 1c Sunrise Project 122 Ave Interchange Yes No Yes Type of Tolling Distance all vehicles on Sunrise Project Distance all vehicles on Sunrise Project Corridor all vehicles on Sunrise Project and OR212/224 Each of the options studied includes 2 lanes in each direction with an additional auxiliary lane Sunrise Project would address congestion in one of Oregon s busiest truck centers Option 2a Sunrise Corridor Option 2b Sunrise Corridor Option 2c Sunrise Corridor Yes No Yes Distance all vehicles on Sunrise Corridor Distance all vehicles on Sunrise Corridor Corridor all vehicles on Sunrise Corridor and OR212/224 Sunrise Corridor would route regional through-traffic around Damascus Town Center and meet long-term population growth 122 Ave Interchange 9

Sunrise Project: Scoping Study Key Results Public Outreach Sunrise area leaders are highly informed about the need for transportation improvements in the area and seem generally supportive of and interested in the project as a solution Perceptions of PPPs and use of tolls to finance the project are still being formed, yet most people contacted think that this approach is a step in the right direction There is a definite need for further education of the residential and business communities about the tolling and what its benefits for individual users as well as the general community Environmental Assessment Sunrise Project Supplemental Draft EIS initiated (expected completion early 2008) The acquisition of Right-of-Way and preliminary engineering initiated, expected completion late 2008 Streamlining opportunities may be considered to complete the construction and open the road to traffic on the earliest feasible date Sunrise Parkway Will require the preparation of a NEPA EIS because it is proposing a new transportation corridor in a rural setting 10

Sunrise Project: Scoping Study Key Results Schedule Schedule developed separately by ODOT and OTIG OTIG suggested schedule assumes a more aggressive pursuit of approvals to proceed with Right-of-Way procurements and to perform as many of the NEPA process activities concurrently and in parallel with the transportation plan development and corridor refinement studies results in a construction start date 20 months earlier than the ODOT schedule for Sunrise Project and 28 months earlier for Sunrise Corridor Schedule NEPA Processing Completion ROW Procurement Completion Design-Build Documents Completion Construction Start Sunrise Project ODOT Dec 2008 Jan 2010 Sep 2009 Feb 2010 OTIG Jun 2008 Dec 2008 Feb 2008 Jun 2008 Sunrise Parkway ODOT Jan 2011 Nov 2011 Aug 2011 Jan 2012 OTIG Oct 2009 Apr 2010 Jun 2009 Oct 2009 11

Sunrise Project: Scoping Study Key Results Traffic Volumes Current Traffic (ADT) on 212/224 11,000 16,000 55,000 45,000 33,000 13,000 13,000 12

Sunrise Project: Scoping Study Key Results Traffic and Revenue Traffic figures are strong near I-205, however drop off dramatically by Rock Creek Junction Sunrise Project would have to compete with the free alternative and would not generate sufficient volumes unless corridor tolling were utilized Corridor tolling would be difficult to implement due to multiple access and egress points The region is growing with preliminary traffic forecasts showing increase in traffic demand in the future (forecast population increase in Damascus to 68,000), however current levels are not sufficient to support a toll project Construction Costs The capital costs of the options range from $393 to $923 million, depending on whether the option considers Sunrise Project only, or the entire Sunrise Corridor 20% and 40% contingencies were included in Sunrise Project and Sunrise Parkway respectively Sunrise Interchange with I-205 estimated at $100 million 122 nd Ave Interchange cost was estimated at $20 million 13

Sunrise Project: Scoping Study Key Results Financial Feasibility Preliminary analysis suggests that none of alternatives identified are self-funding through tolls alone due to (1) high construction costs and (2) low estimated traffic volumes Both Sunrise Project and Corridor may be viable should alternative supplemental sources of funding be identified, or the projects be coupled with other potential toll projects in the greater Portland metropolitan region that could generate excess revenue A comparable case study: The Dulles Greenway A roadway with similar characteristics to those of Sunrise Corridor The Greenway was built prematurely, with traffic projections not materializing until the later years As population growth in the region continues, Sunrise will become more economically viable; however, current analysis suggests that funding gaps are likely insurmountable unless external funding is received ODOT and OTIG have jointly elected to take the off-ramp at Milestone 0 14

I-205 Project 15

I-205 Project: The Issue I-205 is a 25.5 mile long major north-south freight and commuter route experiencing significant traffic issues The transition from 6 lanes to 4 lanes at the Willamette River crossing contributes to significant congestion along the corridor I-205 is forecast to experience continued strong traffic growth in travel demand and further congestion Project lacks sufficient funding at present and in foreseeable future Oregon Transportation Improvement Group (OTIG) engaged in the process to deliver, through South I-205 Corridor Improvement Project, potential improvements to both southern and northern sections ODOT and OTIG have identified several additional alternatives including adding two new lanes in each direction in the southern section and one new lane in each direction in the northern section 16

I-205 Project: Alternatives In Milestone Zero, OTIG examined 13 alternatives differing in the type of tolling utilized and the number of new lanes proposed in each section of the highway Managed Lane Tolling 1-2 lanes are tolled; the rest are general purpose Most complex of the alternatives Corridor Tolling All traffic using the highway pays a toll Most commercially straightforward solution Bridge Tolling All traffic crossing the Abernethy Bridge pays a toll Oregonians have had a positive experience with bridge tolling Shadow Tolling Involves payments by the government to a private concessionaire Based on traffic volumes and service levels Scenario Option 1a One Managed Lane in the South Option 1b One Managed Lane Throughout Option 1c Two Managed Lanes in the South Option 1d Two Managed Lanes Throughout Option 1e Two Managed Lanes in the North One Managed Lane in the South Option 2a Corridor Tolling in the South Option 2b Corridor Tolling Throughout Option 2c Bridge Tolling with new lane in North and South Option 2d Bridge Tolling with new lane in South only Option 3a Shadow Tolling in the South Option 3b Shadow Tolling Throughout Option 3c Shadow Tolling of the Abernethy Bridge with new lane in North and South Option 3d Shadow Tolling of the Abernethy Bridge with new lane in South only New Lanes Southern Section (I-5 to Hwy 213) Managed Lanes Total Lanes 1 1 3 New Lanes Northern Section (Hwy 213 to I-84 East) Managed Lanes Total Lanes 1 1 3 1 1 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 1 2 4 1 1 3 1 2 4 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 4 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 4 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 4 1 n/a 3 1 n/a 4 1 n/a 3 17

I-205 Project: Scoping Study Key Results: Schedule Key Results ODOT follows a typical sequential approach considered to be conservative Streamlining opportunities to complete the construction and open the road to traffic on the earliest feasible date are being considered OTIG suggested schedule assumes an overlap of activities to optimize resources and coordination, and reduce the overall process duration and construction disruptions OTIG schedule could start construction on South I-205 10 months sooner and over 3 years sooner if a project undertaken to address both the North and South I-205 Schedule NEPA Processing Completion ROW Procurement Completion Design-Build Documents Completion Construction Start ODOT South Dec 2008 Jan 2010 Sep 2009 Feb 2010 OTIG South Apr 2009 Dec 2009 Dec 2008 Apr 2009 ODOT South & North Jun 2012 Dec 2013 Aug 2013 Jan 2014 OTIG South & North Oct 2009 Oct 2010 Jun 2009 Oct 2009 18

I-205 Project: Scoping Study Key Results: Traffic and Revenue OTIG used Metro model outputs, 2005 ODOT Reconnaissance Study and transportation volume tables to develop a preliminary traffic and revenue forecast Key Results Managed Lanes Variable pricing maximizes revenues and is generally seen as more fair Managed lane time savings affected by weaving at intersections; likely to require lane barriers and exclusive on and off ramps Managed lane options generate the lowest revenue as lanes are only used during peak congestion; however further study required to determine revenue-maximizing toll Corridor and Bridge Tolling Variable pricing of $2.50 during peak and $1.50 during off-peak utilized as part of the study; can incorporate traffic demand management including free usage during off-peak hours Bridge tolling is most likely to be publicly acceptable as historical precedent Results in much higher revenues than managed lane options with excess funds able to support additional improvement projects in the corridor Shadow Tolling Studied only as a bookend as funding of availability payments under this option is lacking 19

I-205 Project: Scoping Study Key Results: Costs OTIG developed preliminary construction, lifecycle and tolling operations cost estimates for each of the thirteen alternatives Key Results The estimated costs are based on square footage, and/or linear foot costs, and/or unit prices from experience and by using recent ODOT bid tabulations as appropriate The information is typically historical based on the bid prices over a preceding 12 month period Most of the additional width can be accommodated within the existing ROW; ROW costs are estimated at $20 million for the southern section and $60 million for the northern section Operations and maintenance costs assume OTIG maintains the existing and new lanes Managed lane construction costs dramatically increase when contemplating segregated lanes and exclusive on and off ramps Construction Cost Additional Lane in South Additional Lane in North Additional Lane in North & South General Purpose $207 million $209 million $416 million Managed Lane $364 million $484 million $848 million 20

I-205 Project: Scoping Study Key Results: Financial Feasibility OTIG prepared a detailed financial model to analyze the financial feasibility of each of the options given toll revenues, construction and operating cost estimates and debt structures attainable in the market Key Results Managed Lane options are not likely to be financially feasible Distance toll tested at $0.30 per mile however revenue maximization point is likely to be higher and should be examined in Milestone 1 Absolute toll revenue collected is relatively low and unable to cover operating costs in several options Managed Lane enforcement will likely require segregated lanes and exclusive off and on ramps to enforce payment and maximize time savings. This dramatically increases the cost of the project and reduces financial feasibility Corridor and Bridge Tolling alternatives generate the highest tolling revenues and are financially feasible options Funding surplus of up to $490 million in the South assuming tolling of the Abernethy Bridge with $2.50 peak and $1.50 off peak toll Surplus could be applied to additional lanes in the North, interchange improvements along the corridor, regional transit goals Shadow Tolling alternatives are unlikely to be carried forward due to the lack of an exogenous funding source 21

I-205 Project: Scoping Study Key Results: Electronic Tolling Electronic tolling is the preferred method of toll collection by the public and OTIG Key Results OTIG recommends electronic toll collection as the preferred toll collection method Key policy areas to address: Interoperability within Oregon and the Pacific Northwest is a priority Customer service centers should be centralized to obtain economies of scale Use of video tolling is essential to a fully electronic tolling system however raises privacy issues Macquarie has successfully introduced electronic tolling to several projects and can contribute this expertise and know-how to I-205 A high-speed, non-stop electronic toll portal on SR 417 near Orlando, Florida. Electronic toll portal on Route 895 James River Bridge in Virginia ensures travelers a fast, non-stop trip. Washington State s new Good To Go! electronic toll collection system for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge will combine nonstop electronic toll collection with a more traditional cash alternative for visitors and other travelers. 22

I-205 Project: Key Conclusions 1. Improvements to the I-205 Corridor are needed now Current congestion and strong traffic growth forecast 2. Growing public support for the use of tolling Emerging belief that there is a lack of conventional funding and acceptance of limited use of tolling 3. The Project can be delivered as a PPP Construction could commence as soon as April 2009 4. The Project could be self-supporting Surplus funding could be used for long-needed capital projects and/or transit goals 5. Use of electronic tolling is key to ensuring public support Interoperability, customer service centers and violations enforcement 23

I-205 Project: Next Steps Action items: 1. Include the Project in the Regional Transportation Plan update OTIG is proposing detailed technical work to refine the project description and address regional planning goals such as freight mobility and congestion management 2. Implement an extensive public outreach program OTIG is proposing to meet with local leaders, elected officials, stakeholders and the general public to assess opinion and build support through interviews, targeted mailings, on-line and mail-back surveys and focus groups 3. Carry the Project forward to Milestone 1 OTIG would undertake a preliminary investment grade traffic study followed by selection of a preferred option 24