Large Scale Tests of Vaporous Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP ) for Chemical and Biological Weapons Decontamination

Similar documents
Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Safe Disposal of Secondary Waste

Surfactant-Based Chemical and Biological Agent Decontaminating Solution Development

Characterizing PCB contamination in Painted Concrete and Substrates: The Painted History at Army Industrial Sites

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Protective Design. Force Protection Standards and Historic Preservation Policy. DoD Conservation Conference

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Novel Corrosion Control Coating Utilizing Carbon Nanotechnology

Update on ESTCP Project ER-0918: Field Sampling and Sample Processing for Metals on DoD Ranges. Jay L. Clausen US Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC CRREL

Views on Mini UAVs & Mini UAV Competition

Magnesium-Rich Coatings

Evaluation of Dipsol IZ-C17 LHE Zinc-Nickel Plating

Testing Cadmium-free Coatings

Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Management at Fort Stewart

Ultraviolet Curable Powder Coatings With Robotic Curing for Aerospace Applications

Predicting Disposal Costs for United States Air Force Aircraft (Presentation)

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

STORAGE OF LIMITED QUANTITIES OF EXPLOSIVES AT REDUCED Q-D

Grinding & Superfinishing. Methods & Specifications

Evaluation of Zn-rich Primers and Rust Converters for Corrosion Protection of Steel Leonardo Caseres

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

AFRL-RX-TY-TP

Use of Residual Compression in Design to Improve Damage Tolerance in Ti-6Al-4V Aero Engine Blade Dovetails

AND Ti-Si-(Al) EUTECTIC ALLOYS Introduction. temperatur-dependent

Aeronautical Systems Center

POWER MODULE COOLING FOR FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE APPLICATIONS: A COOLANT COMPARISON OF OIL AND PGW

VARTM PROCESS VARIABILITY STUDY

Parametric Study of Heating in a Ferrite Core Using SolidWorks Simulation Tools

Atmospheric Plasma Depainting. Peter Yancey Atmospheric Plasma Solutions, Inc.

EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Title: Human Factors Reach Comfort Determination Using Fuzzy Logic.

Navy s Approach to Green and Sustainable Remediation

DoD Environmental Information Technology Management (EITM) Program

SAIC Analysis of Data Acquired at Camp Butner, NC. Dean Keiswetter

Air Intakes for Subsonic UCAV Applications - Some Design Considerations

Process for Evaluating Logistics. Readiness Levels (LRLs(

Yttria Nanoparticle Reinforced Commercially Pure (CP) Titanium

Decon 2.0: Emerging Decontamination Technologies

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DISPOSAL SITE IN NORTHEASTERN HARDEMAN COUNTY,

Static and dynamic testing of bridges and highways using long-gage fiber Bragg grating based strain sensors

Enhance Facility Energy Management at Naval Expeditionary Base Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti. 12 May 2011

Implementing Open Architecture. Dr. Tom Huynh Naval Postgraduate School

Incremental Sampling Methodology Status Report on ITRC Guidance

COOPERATIVE RELATIONAL DATABASE INITIATIVE FOR THREAT REDUCTION

US Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Environmental Program on Climate Change

Lithium Potassium Manganese Mixed Metal Oxide Material for Rechargeable Electrochemical Cells

Counters for Monitoring

A Conceptual Model of Military Recruitment

Deciding in a Complex Environment : Human Performance Modeling of Dislocated Organizations

Choosing the Right Measures -

Title: Nano shape memory alloy composite development and applications

Solar Powered AUVs; Sampling Systems for the 21 st Century

INTERACTION MATRIX FOR PLANNING UNDERGROUND AMMUNITION STORAGE FACILITIES

Fall 2014 SEI Research Review. Team Attributes &Team Performance FY14-7 Expert Performance and Measurement

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Avoiding Terminations, Single Offer Competition, and Costly Changes with Fixed Price Contracts

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

The Business Case for Systems Engineering: Comparison of Defense-Domain and Non- Defense Projects

DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL

Transparent Ceramic Yb 3+ :Lu2O3 Materials

Army Systems Engineering Career Development Model

Stormwater Asset Inventory and Condition Assessments to Support Asset Management Session 12710

Considerations for Characterization of PAHs at Skeet Ranges and the Possible Future of PAH Risk Assessment

The Case for Impulse - Analysis of Conventional Structures Subjected to Blast Loads

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Stakeholder Needs and Expectations

Integrated Systems Engineering and Test & Evaluation. Paul Waters AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA. 16 August 2011

Development of an integrated ISFET ph sensor for high pressure applications in the deep-sea

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Rockville, MD 20852

3 Workshop Thermochemical processes in plasma aerodynamics

Sediment and Terrestrial Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Nano Aluminum Oxide. Click to edit Master subtitle style

FEASIBILITY OF USING NON PROPAGATION WALLS IN AN EXISTING OPERATING FACILITY. And

Vaporous Decontamination Methods: Potential Uses and Research Priorities for Chemical and Biological Contamination Control

ENHANCED PROPELLANT AND ALTERNATIVE CARTRIDGE CASE DESIGNS

Micro-Aerial Vehicles Materials & Structures

14. SUBJECT TERMS In situ, air sparging, biodegradation, volatilization environmental cleanup, bioremediation, groundwater.

Low Volatile Organic Compound Containing Wash Primer for Letterkenny Army Depot

Logistics Technology Assessment

NOTICE OF CHANGE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD HUMAN ENGINEERING

EFFECT OF MATERIAL PHASE CHANGE ON PENETRATION AND SHOCK WAVES

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Cadmium Replacements for High Strength Steel Fasteners

Solar Thermal Radiant Heating at Pohakuloa Training Area

THE TARDEC ADVANCED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CAPABILITY (ASEC)

Principles of Chlorine Dioxide Gas as a Decontamination Method

ERDC/GSL TN-14-2 August 2014 Review of Instrumentation and Monitoring for USACE Levees

Suspended Sediment Discharges in Streams

Optical and Mechanical Properties of Nano-Composite Optical Ceramics

Joint Logistics Strategic Plan

RISKS FROM HANDLING EXPLOSIVES IN PORTS

EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Engineered Resilient Systems

Improving Strategic Decision and Senior-level Teamwork in U.S. National Security Organizations

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BLAST DESIGN FOR THE EXPLOSIVES DEVELOPMENT FACILITY ABSTRACT

TSP Performance and Capability Evaluation (PACE): Customer Guide

A Bioluminescence Bathyphotometer for an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Low-Volatility Agent Permeation Test Method and Fixture

Distributed Waste to Energy Conversion: A Piece of the DOD s Renewable Energy Puzzle

Transcription:

Large Scale Tests of Vaporous Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP ) for Chemical and Biological Weapons Decontamination George Wagner, Larry Procell, David Sorrick, Brian MacIver, Abe Turetsky, Jerry Pfarr, Diane Dutt, Mark Brickhouse Edgewood Chemical Biological Center Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010 Lew Schwartz, Iain McVey, Paul Wiget, Steris Corp. David Stark, EAI Corp. 2004 Scientific Conference on Chemical and Biological Defense Research November 17, 2004

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 17 NOV 2004 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Large Scale Tests of Vaporous Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP ) for Chemical and Biological Weapons Decontamination 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Edgewood Chemical Biological Center Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001849, 2004 Scientific Conference on Chemical and Biological Defense Research. Held in Hunt Valley, Maryland on 15-17 November 2004., The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 27 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Steris VHP Test Abstract Vaporous Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) has been used for more than a decade to sterilize clean rooms and pharmaceutical processing equipment and, more recently, to decontaminate anthraxcontaminated buildings. Recent studies at ECBC have shown that the addition of low-levels of ammonia gas renders VHP reactive towards GD, converting it to pinacolyl methylphosphonic acid. Thus, with suitable activation via ammonia gas, modified vaporous hydrogen peroxide (mvhp) affords the broad-spectrum decontamination of the chemical weapon (CW) agents VX, GD, and HD.* Studies at ECBC have also shown that mvhp is effective in decontamination of biological weapon (BW) surrogates, though mvhp does not at present appear to be substantially superior to standard VHP for biological decontamination. Potential applications of mvhp for military and civilian decontamination include: buildings, vehicle and aircraft interiors, and sensitive equipment. Recent large scale tests of mvhp applicability for BW and CW decontamination were carried out in one of the ECBC Engineering Chambers, Building E3726. The study evaluated the use of mvhp to decontaminate BW agent surrogates and live CW agents on representative aircraft interior materials. These studies showed that at treatment levels of 250 ppm VHP and treatment times of 24 hours, residual contact hazard from chemical agents was reduced to the ORD required levels on all test materials, with the exception of decontamination of VX run at relatively low ammonia concentrations. These studies also showed that at treatment levels of 250 ppm VHP and treatment times of 24 hours, off-gas hazard from chemical agents was reduced to the ORD required levels for all test materials, with the exception of VX run at relatively low ammonia concentrations. The effect of ammonia concentration on BW and CW decontamination efficacy is currently under study. *U.S. and international patents pending.

Images of mvhp Generator and D- Box Used for Biological Decontamination Studies

ECBC Large Chamber Tests Steris M1000 VHP Generators 1000 ft 3 Exposure Chamber

Large Chamber Test Design Agents: VX, GD, HD Surrogates: DEPPT, TEP, CEPS, MPS 2-4 µl agent deposited on test substrate coupon, allowed to age for one hour ca. 1000 ft 3 size chamber constructed inside larger chamber (E3726) Flow rate ~60 CFM Ambient Temperatures VHP generated using 35 % H 2 O 2 and two commercial M-1000 (Steris) VHP Biodecontamination systems H 2 O 2 injection rate ~75 g/min, to maintain ~ 275 ppm [H 2 O 2 ] (measured) NH 3 gas introduced into VHP stream just prior to its entering the chamber, to maintain ~ 20 ppm [NH 3 ] (calculated) Expose sample for 3, 8, or 24 hours Extract substrates using ethyl acetate Analyze extract by GC-MS (residual agent/products) (Detection limit ~1 ng)

Large Chamber Test Substrates Stainless Steel (blank) Glass (control) Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) painted steel (MIL-P-53039A) Aluminum 2024 (Spec T3) (uncoated) Air Force Topcoat-coated aluminum (MIL-P-85285-PU) Butyl rubber-covered cloth (Boeing insulation cover) Kapton (Polyimide) (wiring insulation) Nylon Webbing (MIL-W-4088, T3, C3) Concrete (Structural)

Large Chamber Test Methods Contact Hazard = Natural Latex Rubber dental dam is placed in contact with contaminated substrate, held in contact by 1 kg weight for 15 minutes, then extracted with ethyl acetate and analyzed by GC-MS for amount of agent/surrogate transferred Residual Hazard = Contaminated substrate, after contact hazard test, is extracted with ethyl acetate and analyzed by GC- MS for amount of agent/surrogate remaining Headspace = Air sample taken directly over contaminated substrate plate and collected on solid sorbent tube, analyzed by GC-MS for mass of agent/surrogate captured

Large Chamber Test Results Typical Concentration Profile Steris VHP GD Run 271110-281110 Oct 03 6545 ppm-hr 300 Concentration (ppm) 250 200 150 100 50 H2O2 Conc (ppm) NH3 Conc (ppm) 0 10/27/03 9:36 10/27/03 14:24 10/27/03 19:12 10/28/03 0:00 10/28/03 4:48 10/28/03 9:36 10/28/03 14:24 Date & Time

HD Background Data Joint Portable Decon System ORD Requirements: HD Contact/Residual Hazard: Required = 3.0 mg/m 2 HD Contact/Residual Hazard: Desired = 0.0 mg/m 2 HD Headspace Hazard: Required = 2.3 x 10-2 mg/m 3 HD Headspace Hazard: Desired = 3.0 x 10-3 mg/m 3 Minimum Detectable Limits for Tests: Contact/Residual Hazard: 4.93 x 10-5 mg/m2 Headspace Hazard: 8.33 x 10-5 mg/m 3 Concentration x Time Values (ppm-hr) 24-hour 8-hour VHP NH 3 VHP NH 3 1HD: 956 177 (6-hour sample) 2HD: 4657 337 2018 140 3HD: 6716 472 2286 165 4HD: 6484 721 2176 382

Contact Hazard Fumigation Data Contact Hazard Decontamination of HD by mvhp 24 Hour Exposure 1.E+01 ORD Req d HD Recovered (mg/m2) 1.E+00 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 MDL 1.E-04 1HD 2HD 3HD 4HD Test Run JPDS ORD Contact Hazard Reqm't Glass Aluminum CARC USAF Topcoat Butyl-coated Cloth Nylon Cloth Kapton Concrete

Headspace Hazard Fumigation Data HD Recovered (mg/m3) 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 ORD Req d 1.0E-02 AEL/TWA 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 MDL 1.0E-05 Headspace Hazard Decontamination of HD by mvhp 24 Hour Exposure 1HD 2HD 3HD 4HD Test Run JPDS ORD Headspace Hazard Reqm't Glass Aluminum CARC Topcoat Butyl Nylon Kapton Concrete JPDS ORD Headspace Hazard Des'd

Agent Fate Baseline Data Shows ~0.7 mg/m 3 HD in headspace after 24 hours weathering; HD in headspace after 24 hr mvhp treatment 3 orders of magnitude lower, ~0.0005 mg/m 3 Lab/Wind Tunnel Data Avg HD Conc. (mg/m3) 100 10 1 0.1 5cm Tunnel Run#3, HD on Aluminum at near 30C HAP 0.01 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Minutes micrograms of HD evap. 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 y = -7.9425x + 1009.6 R 2 = 0.9969 y = 3.0566x - 18.023 R 2 = 0.9976 TGA #1 - HD on Al at 30C 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Minutes Vapor wgt 7cycles Linear (wgt) Linear (7cycles)

Large Chamber Test Results HD Reaction Products VHP Decon of HD on Glass Micrograms recovered 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 HD HDO HDO2 Hours of VHP Exposure

GD Background Data Joint Portable Decon System ORD Requirements: GD Contact/Residual Hazard: Required = 1.7 mg/m 2 GD Contact/Residual Hazard: Desired = 0.0 mg/m 2 GD Headspace Hazard: Required = 1.3 x 10-3 mg/m 3 GD Headspace Hazard: Desired = 2.0 x 10-4 mg/m 3 Minimum Detectable Limits for Tests: Contact/Residual Hazard: 4.93 x 10-5 mg/m 2 Headspace Hazard: 8.33 x 10-5 mg/m 3 Concentration x Time Values (ppm-hr): 24-hour 8-hour VHP NH 3 VHP NH 3 1GD: 6549 560 2200 223 2GD: 6545 414 2138 137 3GD: 6358 379 2117 131

Contact Hazard Fumigation Data 1.E+01 Contact Hazard Decontamination of GD by mvhp 24 Hour Exposure JPDS ORD Contact Hazard Reqm't Glass ORD Req d 1.E+00 GD Recovered (mg/m2) 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 MDL 1.E-04 1GD 2GD 3GD Test Run Aluminum CARC USAF Topcoat Butyl-coated Cloth Nylon Cloth Kapton Concrete

Headspace Hazard Fumigation Data GD Recovered (mg/m3) 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 ORD Req d 1.0E-03 AEL/TWA 1.0E-04 MDL 1.0E-05 Headspace Hazard Decontamination of GD by mvhp 24 Hour Exposure 1GD 2GD 3GD Test Run JPDS ORD Headspace Hazard Reqm't Glass Aluminum CARC Topcoat Butyl Nylon Kapton Concrete JPDS ORD Headspace Hazard Des'd

Large Chamber Test Results GD Reaction Products VHP Decon of GD on Glass 3500 Micrograms Recovered 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0-500 0 5 10 15 20 25 GD PMPA Exposure Time (hrs)

VX Background Data Joint Portable Decon System ORD Requirements: VX Contact/Residual Hazard: Required = 4.0 x 10-2 mg/m 2 VX Contact/Residual Hazard: Desired = 0.0 mg/m 2 VX Headspace Hazard: Required = 1.7 x 10-4 mg/m 3 VX Headspace Hazard: Desired = 2.4 x 10-5 mg/m 3 Minimum Detectable Limits for Tests: Contact/Residual Hazard: 4.93 x 10-5 mg/m2 Headspace Hazard: 3.33 x 10-5 mg/m 3 Concentration x Time Values (ppm-hr): 24-hour 8-hour VHP NH3 VHP NH3 1VX 6352 488 2113 189 2VX 6182 320 1824 121 3VX (Not Collected) 2038 103 4VX 6681 141 2109 47

Contact Hazard Fumigation Data VX Recovered (mg/m2) 1.E+02 1.E+01 1.E+00 1.E-01 ORD Req d 1.E-02 1.E-03 MDL 1.E-04 Contact Hazard Decontamination of VX by mvhp 24 Hour Exposure QSTAG/USANCA Guidance JPDS ORD Contact Hazard Reqm't Glass Aluminum CARC USAF Topcoat Butyl-coated Cloth Nylon Cloth 1.E-05 1VX 2VX 4VX Test Run Kapton Concrete

Headspace Hazard Fumigation Data VX Recovered (mg/m3) 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 ORD Req d 1.0E-04 MDL AEL/TWA Headspace Hazard Decontamination of VX by mvhp 24 Hour Exposure JPDS ORD Headspace Hazard Reqm't Glass Aluminum CARC Topcoat Butyl Nylon Kapton 1.0E-05 1VX 2VX 4VX Test Run Concrete JPDS ORD Headspace Hazard Des'd

Kill Curves for VHP and mvhp vs. Avirulent anthrax H 2 O 2 & NH 3 concentration effects on kill rate of B. anthracis NNR1d1 Spores on glass coupons CFUs Recovered 1.0E+08 1.0E+07 1.0E+06 1.0E+05 1.0E+04 1.0E+03 1.0E+02 1.0E+01 1.0E+00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (min) ~500 ppm H2O2, 25 ppm NH3 ~500 ppm H2O2, 0 ppm NH3 ~300 ppm H2O2, 25 ppm NH3 ~300 ppm H2O2, 8.2 ppm NH3 ~300 ppm H2O2, 0 ppm NH3

Kill Curves for mvhp vs. Avirulent anthrax Thorough Decontamination: BW Decontamination by VHP at Room Scale Chamber mvhp studies using B. anthracis NNR1d1 1.00E+08 Recovered CFUs 1.00E+07 1.00E+06 1.00E+05 1.00E+04 1.00E+03 1.00E+02 1.00E+01 1.00E+00 Concrete CARC Glass Galvanized Webbing 0 30 150 300 Exposure Time (min)

Test Results Chambers study is the first demonstration of fumigationstyle decontamination of CW agents at the room scale 24-hour mvhp treatment with 250 ppm VHP + 20 ppm NH 3 effectively reduces contact hazards of HD, GD, and VX to limits of detection 24-hour mvhp treatment with 250 ppm VHP + 20 ppm NH 3 reduces vapor hazards of GD and VX to limits of detection 24-hr treatment with 250 ppm mvhp + 20 ppm NH 3 reduces HD vapor hazard, but detectable amounts remain, especially on porous surfaces Porous surfaces may require longer mvhp treatment times mvhp is marginally less effective as an anthrax decontaminant than VHP itself

Building Scale VHP Decontamination N Filters / NAM E3220 Air Handling System Electrical Generator (All VHP System Components Powered by Generator) E3222 Internal Sensor Module RM 114 RM 114B RM 113 RM 112 Stairs Vaporizer Module RM 115 Distribution Fan RM 106 RM 10 7 RM 108 RM 109 RM 11 0 RM 111 Strategic Technology Enterprises, Inc. a subsidiary of STERIS Corporation 0 ft. 9 ft. 15 ft. 30 ft. VHP Layout E3220 1st Floor SIZE FSCM NO DWG NO REV January 16, 2004 B 0 VHP Layout E3220 1st Floor SCALE SHEET 5 OF 5

E3220 VHP Decontamination Test Results Demonstrated ability to obtain 125, 250 and 450 ppm treatment levels in 50,000 cu. ft. volume for 5 hour treatment cycle Used computational modeling to model air flow in rooms and lay out distribution system Confirmed model results with VHP sensor readings during readiness trials 100% Kill of G. strearothermophilus BI s at 125ppm, 250 ppm and 450 ppm VHP treatment levels

mvhp Decontamination trial at Davis- Monthan AFB, November 2004; 100% BI kill in tests to date C-141 with External Air Handler and NAM

QUESTIONS?