Istokpoga Marsh Watershed Improvement District (IMWID) Minor Impoundment Project. May 23, 2012

Similar documents
DRAINAGE REPORT FOR. Creeks Crossing

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

Continuous Simulation Modeling of Stormwater Ponds, Lakes, & Wetlands: A BUILT-IN APPLICATION OF PONDS 3.2

SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

Software Applications for Runoff Hydrological Assessment

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

4.1 General Methodology and Data Base Development

Project Drainage Report

Climate Sensitivity Runs (DRAFT)

Stormwater as an Alternative Source of Water Supply: Feasibility and Implications for Watershed Management 1

5/11/2007. WinTR-55 for Plan Reviews Small Watershed Hydrology Overview

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report Mountaineer Plant Bottom Ash Pond Complex New Haven, West Virginia

Outlet Structure Modeling

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY A EXTENSION DRAINAGE REPORT

APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

DRAINAGE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Gwinnett County Stormwater System Assessment Program

Location Drainage Study

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Runoff Hydrographs. The Unit Hydrograph Approach

Keys Edge Community Development District. Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements

Jamestown Public Schools Bush Elementary Addition and Alterations

Florida s Deranged Hydrology and the National Water Model Challenges and Opportunities

CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS OF THE MAINLINE TUNNEL USING ICAP

The City of Cocoa (City) is located in east

DRAFT. Jacob Torres, P.E.; Nick Fang, Ph.D., P.E.

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

Chapter 12 Storage. Contents. Overview... 1

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

LAWRENCE, KANSAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICANT S HANDBOOK VOLUME II (Design and Performance Standards Including Basin Design and Criteria)

Detention Pond Design and Analysis. CE 378 Water Resources Engineering. Contents

OPERATION PLAN PERFORMANCE PLAN TEN MILE CREEK WATER PRESERVE AREA

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

2C-12 Detention Basin Outlet Structures

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall

Modelling and Analysis of EES Systems Using SWMM

Table of Contents. 5-5 Release Rates Year Allowable Release Rate WQCV Release Rate EURV Release Rate...

DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1

2

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Drainage Design Assistance

CHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg

1. Stream Network. The most common approach to quantitatively describing stream networks was postulated by Strahler (1952).

BROWARD GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MAPS - PREDICTED CHANGES AND PLANNED UPDATES

NRCS Hydrology methodology review Minnesota NRCS recommendation MnDOT recommendation Using Atlas 14 with HydroCAD

STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT

10.0 Storm Sewer Systems

DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF

Urban Drainage Introduction. A.Ramachandra Rao. C.B. Burke. T.T. Burke, Jr.

CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER DESIGN

Sediment Basin. Fe= (Depends on soil type)

STONE OAK DAM: TO BREACH OR NOT TO BREACH, THAT IS THE QUESTION. TFMA Spring Conference 2013

THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN. 4. Drainage Plan. a. Drainage Plan Description

Modelling Climate Change and Urbanization Impacts on Urban Stormwater and Adaptation Capacity

PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS ANALYSES RESULTS

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

BMPTRAINS MODEL: A TRAINING WORKSHOP B Y : M AR T Y W AN I E L I S T A, H AR V E Y H AR P E R AN D M I K E H AR D I N.

Appendix B HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC MODELING

SBSA. DATE: 31 May 2016 HILL AIR FORCE BASE CEN/CEIE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION

Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts HDS 5 September 1985

Infiltration Stormwater Control Measures. Andrew R. Anderson, M.S., E.I.T. Extension Associate Engineer

RED RIVER FLOODWAY OPERATION REPORT SPRING Manitoba Infrastructure

Phase 2 CSO Control Plan/Wellington Avenue CSO Facility

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

Stormwater Volume and Treatment Methods Simplifying the Numbers. IAFSM March 10, Presented by: Tom Powers P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CPESC

Appendix VI: Illustrative example

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands

Chatham Park Stormwater Manual

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006

VOLUME 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

City of Oakland. Public Works Agency Standards STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES. Engineering Design & ROW Management Division

PINELLAS COUNTY SURFACE WATER UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS AND MITIGATION CREDITS POLICY

Chapter 3 Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

URBAN FLOODING: HEC-HMS

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:

City of Tulsa. Stormwater Design Criteria Manual

Transcription:

STORMWATER INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT Istokpoga Marsh Watershed Improvement District (IMWID) Minor Impoundment Project Prepared by Chastain-Skillman, Inc. Prepared for May 23, 2012 Certificate of Authorization No. CA262 363 US Highway 27 South (33870) Post Office Box 7036 Sebring, Florida 33872-0101 [863] 382-4160 Highlands County Board of County Commissioners 4344 George Boulevard Sebring, Florida 33875-5803 Submitted to South Florida Water Management District 205 North Parrott Avenue, Suite 201 Okeechobee, Florida 34972 ENGINEER: Wendy G. Contner, P.E. Fla. Reg. No. 70604 CSI File No. 8680.63 Copyright 2012

Minor Impoundment Project Stormwater Calculations Table of Contents Page No. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS REPORT... 1-2 List of Attachments Attachment No. ICPR MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT DATA...1 CSI File No. 8680.63 i

Minor Impoundment Project Stormwater Calculations 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY The attached ICPR model is provided to determine the maximum water depth of the proposed minor impoundment and to size an emergency overflow structure. The design is based upon the guidelines provided in Appendix 6, Section 2.2 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permits. 2.0 MODEL INPUT BASIN: The basin area of 282.7 acres represents the top of bank area of the reservoir. It is conservatively assumed that this entire acreage is open water retention with a Curve Number equal to 100. NODE: The node represents the stage/storage areas of the impoundment. The initial stage elevation is set at the overflow weir elevation of 33.75. A base flow of 78 cfs is presented here to account for the maximum amount of water being pumped into the reservoir when all pumps are operating. This pumpage amount of 78 cfs or 35,000 gpm was established by the modeling efforts of Del Bottcher. Del s report titled Operation Protocols is also provided under separate cover. WEIR: The weir represents a 300 ft wide structure with invert elevation equal to 33.5. The height of opening is the difference between the structure invert and top of bank elevation of 36. TAILWATER: Per Appendix 6, Section 2.1.2.4, the tailwater elevation must be set assuming a 100-year downstream condition. Per Del s modelings (see attached supporting e-mail), it is estimated that 100-year elevation of the receiving canal is 31.4, utilized elevation 32.0 in the model. ROUTING/HYDROLOGY: Per Appendix 6, Section 2.1.2.2., a three day 25-year storm event was routed to determine the maximum water depth also known as the design water depth for minor impoundments. A three day 25- year storm event produces 9 inches of rainfall per Figure C.10 of the Basis of Review Design Aids. CSI File No. 8680.63 1

Minor Impoundment Project MODEL RESULTS Stormwater Calculations The maximum water depth a.k.a. design water depth equals elevation 34.0. This elevation is based upon all pumps running with a three day 25-year rainfall event on the impoundment area. The impoundment s top of bank elevation is 36.0, therefore a two foot freeboard is provided above the maximum water depth. FLOODPLAIN The site lies within a ZONE A floodplain. Per the guidelines of the Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Volume IV 2011, the site is determined to be an Exporter. 1. Site pre-development 100-year, 3-day storm runoff volume: computed by using the SCS method of volume estimation given by: Runoff Depth Over Basin (Q) = (P- 0.2*S) 2 / (P+ 0.8*S) where P = Rainfall Depth (11.0") S = Potential Storage Abstraction = 1000/CN 10; CN = 84 Q = 231.33 ac-ft 2. Site pre-development storage available to the basin during the 100-year flood. V = 9.48 ac-ft 3. Since the difference between (1) and (2) is positive (231.33 9.48 = 221.85), thus the runoff volume is larger than the available storage; the site is considered an exporter of basin runoff. In the post-development conditions, the site s contributing runoff downstream during the 100-year, 3-day storm event will be eliminated since the impoundment s overflow is set at 2.1 foot above the estimated 100-year elevation of the surrounding canal. CSI File No. 8680.63 2

Nodes A Stage/Area V Stage/Volume T Time/Stage M Manhole Basins O Overland Flow U SCS Unit CN S SBUH CN Y SCS Unit GA Z SBUH GA Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach E Percolation F Filter X Exfil Trench T:TW-100 year W: OVERFLOW A: impoundment U:impound. basin Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.

==== Basins ============================================================================== Name: impound. basin Node: impoundment Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 282.700 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 100.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ==== Nodes =============================================================================== Name: impoundment Base Flow(cfs): 78.000 Init Stage(ft): 33.600 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 36.000 Type: Stage/Area BASE FLOW REPRESENTS THE INFLOW FROM ALL PUMPS RUNNING Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 30.000 20.9400 31.000 20.9500 32.000 153.9500 33.000 198.2000 34.000 260.8000 35.000 276.7000 36.000 282.7000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: TW-100 year Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 32.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 32.000 Type: Time/Stage 100-year elevation in canal per Del Bottcher's study Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 32.000 72.00 32.000 ==== Weirs =============================================================================== Name: OVERFLOW From Node: impoundment Group: BASE To Node: TW-100 year Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 3600.00 Rise(in): 30.00 Invert(ft): 33.500 Control Elevation(ft): 33.500 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 TABLE ==== Hydrology Simulations =============================================================== Name: 25-yr, 3-day Filename: I:\LKDCIV\PUBLIC\Sebring\Istokpoga\sfwmd.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 72.00 Rainfall File: Sfwmd72 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 72.000 5.00 ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 2

Name: 25-yr, 3-day Hydrology Sim: 25-yr, 3-day Filename: I:\LKDCIV\PUBLIC\Sebring\Istokpoga\sfwmd.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 72.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 2

Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs impoundment BASE 25-yr, 3-day 60.73 33.98 36.00 0.0050 11307516 59.99 1199.96 60.73 319.84 TW-100 year BASE 25-yr, 3-day 0.00 32.00 32.00 0.0000 0 60.73 319.84 0.00 0.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1

about:blank Page 1 of 1 5/23/2012 Wendy Contner - Fwd: RE: Istokpoga Above Ground Impoundment From: Wendy Contner Subject: Fwd: RE: Istokpoga Above Ground Impoundment >>> "Del Bottcher" <dbottcher@swet.com> 4/17/2012 7:25 PM >>> Wendy and Ron, I have completed a number of simulations and it s clear we can go even lower with the pump sizes. My current recommend is for a two 15,000 gpm pumps and one 5,000 gpm duty pump. These pumps will work with or without the neighboring farmer pumping in, so I suggest you design using a total of 35,000 gpm for your outlet. As far as the 100-yr tailwater elevation, my results show a maximum stage of 31.4 feet over the 43-year simulation for the reach receiving the impoundment s outflow. Therefore, it would be safe to assume that the 100-yr stage would be a little less than 32 feet. Del Del Bottcher, Ph.D. P.E. Soil and Water Engineering Technology, Inc. 3448 NW 12 th Ave Gainesville, FL 32605 Office PH: (352)378-7372 Cell PH: (352) 281-2876