Welcome to the H1 Software

Similar documents
KKB Micro Testing Labs Pvt. Ltd., , 2 nd Floor, Tarun Plaza, NFC Main Road, Krishna Nagar Colony, Moula Ali, Hyderabad, Telangana

GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE BEST PRACTICABLE MEANS FOR

APPENDIX H AIR DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT BY PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD. (REF. CHAPTER 11 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATIC FACTORS)

Horizontal Guidance Note H1 Overview document

Excerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants

Government Decree on Waste Incineration (151/2013; amendments up to 1303/2015 included)

Questionnaire (Wood Processing)

Viridor (Cardiff Energy Recovery Facility) Substantial Variation

LEVENSEAT GASIFICATION PLANT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

COMMISSIONING REPORT 2011

Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date Certificate Number T-3553 Valid Until Last Amended on - Page 1 of 9

2017 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (SECTOR RELATED QUESTIONS)

Introduction. Ridge Road Transfer Station Ridge Road, Cleveland

Hot Gas Filters for Control of Emissions to Atmosphere

WASTE TO ENERGY. A Technical Review of Municipal Solid Waste Thermal Treatment Practices FINAL REPORT

WASTE INCINERATION PLANTS IN AUSTRIA WITH DATA ON WASTE MANAGEMENT IN VIENNA

Appendix VIII: Determination of chimney heights

Environmental product declaration. KONE MonoSpace Special

Alter NRG Plasma Gasification: Environmental Performance

This is a draft revision of the briefing, and any comments are welcome please them to Becky Slater on

Permit with introductory note

REPORT SURAT GAS PROJECT SUPPLEMENTARY AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT. Coffey Environments

Article 1: Article 2:

Portbury Dock Renewable Energy Plant. Cumulative Impact Assessment Non-Technical Summary September 2009

Air quality in stations

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE TEXTILE AND PRINTING INDUSTRY (SECTOR-RELATED QUESTIONS)

ENVIRONMENTAL performance in 2012

November Nanticoke Refinery Reduction plan summary (OR 455/09)

Single-Source Impacts on Secondary PM 2.5 Formation A Case Study

Environmental performance in 2016

ADEQ NON-CRITERIA POLLUTANT CONTROL STRATEGY Revised April 2015

Westinghouse Plasma Gasification is the Next Generation of Energy from Waste Technology. USEA Annual Meeting May 30, 2013 Washington, DC

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN 2011 UPM, Kymi

Permit with introductory note

Evaluation of Options for Addressing Secondary PM 2.5 and Ozone Formation. Bruce Macdonald, PhD Jason Reed, CCM

Permit with introductory note

DG ENV.C.3 Industrial emissions

PSD Background Presentation

Environmental impact of incineration of calorific industrial waste in a rotary kiln and in a cement kiln. A comparison.

DAVID BRENNAN SUSTAINABLE PROCESS ENGINEERING CONCEPTS, STRATEGIES, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION. Pan Stanford. Publishing

November Nanticoke Refinery Reduction plan summary (OR 455/09)

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORT [STATEMENT] CONSTRUCTION WORK [ HALF YEARLY ] PERIOD OCTOBER 2012 TO MARCH 2013 FOUNDRY PARK

Emission Criteria for Biomedical Waste Incinerators

L 328/28 Official Journal of the European Union DIRECTIVES

A LEADING PROVIDER OF CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

ZZH/CLAB-KSPCB/04/ Environmental Officer,

Materials and the Environment Part 4 Monitoring, Measuring, and Assessing Environmental Impacts

LABORATORY ACTIONS, DECISIONS & SAFETY WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION

END-OF-LIFE PATHWAYS FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC BACKSHEETS

AIR POLLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCY

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES

Questionnaire (Steel Mills and Metal Smelting and Refining)

Technical Notes for Biomass and Air Quality Guidance

Country profiles. Industrial pollution. Italy. December Photo: Edwin van Buuringen

IA-01 Insignificant Activities Required to be Listed

Notification of Department of Industrial Works

Solid Waste to Energy

DR1000 Flying Laboratory, Drone Environmental Monitoring

Major Air Pollutants

Standard rules SR2012 No10

DETERMINATION OF CONCENTRATION AND MASS FLOW OF PARTICULATE MATTER IN FLUE GAS FOR STATIONARY SOURCE EMISSIONS

FACT SHEET MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS

Emission Challenges in Cement Making due to alternative Fuels

4.0 Predicted Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

VERMONT USED OIL ANALYSIS AND WASTE OIL FURNACE EMISSIONS STUDY

Faculty of engineering Department of chemical engineering De Croylaan 46, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of these regulations, please see the Table of Regulations.

Issue 2 18 August Job number

CANADA-WIDE STANDARDS FOR PM & OZONE STATUS OF JURISDICTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES MANITOBA

Life Cycle Assessment of the use of solid biomass for electricity

UNIT DOSE A Sustainability Step for Fabrics Liquids

Project & Environmental Review. Guidelines Environmental Air Assessment. Vancouver Fraser Port Authority

The ARPRO Life Cycle Assessment

SUMMARY. 1 Large household appliances. 2 Small household appliances. 3 Informatics and Telecommunication (IT) equipment. 4 Consuming products

Emission Estimation Technique Manual

Air quality directives in EU legislation

PRODUCT CATEGORY RULES (PCR) for preparing an environmental product declaration (EPD) for. - Cooker hood - PCR 2007:05

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A BIOREACTOR AND AN ENGINEERED LANDFILL FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TREATMENT

Coke Manufacturing. Environmental Guidelines for. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Agricultural Plastic Recycling Program. Mountain View County and Mountain View Regional Waste Management Commission

06. Electroplating Industry

Biomass Boiler Emission Abatement Technologies. Simon Wakefield

METHOD 3 - GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

Air Pollution in NJ: Past,Present and thoughts about the Future

HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM. State Regulations. Medical Waste AN\ AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION

Emission Testing August 2013 EPA 4 Benzene Combustor Inlet/Outlet Testing

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT MODELING FOR AIR QUALITY FOR OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENTS UNDER NEPA

Product Environmental Profile Weatherproof modular enclosures Kaedra

27.0 SAMPLING AND TESTING METHODS

MEAN ANNUAL EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN AGED 0-4 YEARS TO ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE POLLUTION

PREPARED BY: Demos Dracoulides. CAPE TOWN PO Box 60034, 7439 Table View, Cape Tel: Fax:

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

Guide towards a more sustainable tannery sector in the Mediterranean

Air Pollution and Conservation Areas

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

The Chemical Industry and Climate Change. A Snapshot from India

Current Topics In Air Quality

Transcription:

Welcome H1 Version Welcome to the H1 Software 2.01- May 2010 Introduction This version of the tool accompanies Horizontal Guidnace Note 1 Version 2.0 April 2010 (As Amended) Important Notes: This software tool can be used to complete most of the modules within H1. However, further information may need to be provided in the following areas: - detailed assessment of fate and effects, where required - decision-making trails for the comparison and ranking of options This software provides a general structure for assessing costs and environmental impacts. You may need to decide the best way to apply this structure to fit the nature and pattern of your operation, in particular: - where load is variable, such as seasonal or demand-led operations - where a number of processes are conducted at the same time, such as integrated operations - where a number of products are made, with possible differences in unit operations and release points employed - where fugitive or potential emergency releases are of particular interest Information in this database will be used to determine your EPR permit, therefore to get the most from this software tool, you should: - read the introduction to the H1 guidance, to understand the basic principles, module structure and methods - use the HELP boxes and refer to the H1 guidance as you progress to ensure that the data you input is representative and accurate - use the comments boxes to clarify assumptions and data sources Some basic instructions for using the software tool are provided on our web site at www.environment-agency.gov.uk/h1softwareguidance The application has been optimised for a screen resolution of 800 x 600 Version 2.01 31 May 2010 In conjunction with: www.ability-software.co.uk

Reference Information Reference Information Please complete the following information: Company Name: WRG Location: Greatmoor EfW Line 1 Permit Number: EP Application

Introduction, Module 1 module 1 Introduction to Module 1 Module 1: Describe the Scope and Options The aim of this module is to: - state the OBJECTIVES of the assessment - in the case of ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT of the whole installation, describe the scope of the activities to be included in the assessment; - in the case of OPTIONS APPRAISALS, identify candidate options for BAT by considering all relevant techniques to prevent and minimise pollution and the scope of activities covered by the techniques. Depending on the reason for the assessment, you will need to complete different modules of the guidance. The software will automatically select the required modules according to the responses you enter. NOTE: If you are going to complete more than one assessment or appraisal, make sure that you create a copy of the H1 file for each new assessment BEFORE you begin to input data. This is because Microsoft Access automatically saves changes to the current file you are using, rather than allowing you to save your changes at the end of your work. TO CONTINUE WITH MODULE 1, PRESS "NEXT".

Describe the Objectives Describe the Objectives Depending on the reason for the assessment, you will need to complete different modules of the guidance. Select the type of assessment: a) to conduct a costs/benefits OPTIONS APPRAISAL to determine BAT for selected releases from an installation Do modules 1,2, 3 and 4 and continue with 5 and 6 if necessary b) to carry out an ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT of the emissions resulting from the installation as a whole Do modules 1, 2 and 3 only 1.1 Briefly summarise the objectives and reason for the assessment in terms of the main environmental impacts or emissions to be controlled: ERF Environmental Assessment including Air Quality & GWP100 as CO2e [plus nitrous oxide (N2O)]

Scope of Environmental Assessment Scope of Environmental Assessment List the activities included in the assessment This should include all the activities in your permit, broken down into the basic process steps, such as: raw materials storage, handling, processing, emission control, waste treatment etc. as appropriate. See H1 for guidance and use the comments box below to provide any additional information. Number Activity 1 Releases to the environment from combustion, energy use, GWP [CO2e & Nitrous Oxides, N2O] and impact on environment Comments

Module 2 - Emissions Inventory module 2 Introduction to Module 2 Module 2: Emissions Inventory The aim of this module is to produce an inventory of sources and releases of polluting substances from each option. This is used as the basis for the subsequent evaluation of environmental impacts. For this module you will require information on: - release points and sources of emissions to all media - concentration and mass rate of emitted substances - frequency and duration of emissions and how these relate to long term and short term effects IMPORTANT NOTES - you may need to consider a suitable method for assessment of groups of pollutants, such as VOCs, heavy metals, uncharacterised liquid effluents, etc (see H1 guidance for details). TO CONTINUE WITH MODULE 2, PRESS "NEXT".

Air Release Points Base Option Air Release Points Please define your Release Points for Releases to Air Are there any Air emissions? Yes Number Description Location or Grid Reference Activity or Activities Effective Height Efflux Velocity Total Flow metres m/s m3/hr 1 A1 (Stack 1) Line 1 63.1 15.6 189978 Comments

Air Emissions Inventory Base Option Air Emissions Inventory Please list all Substances released to Air for each Release Point identified in the previous page. Number Substance Meas'ment Method Operating Mode (if relevant) Data relating to Long Term effects Data relating to Short Term effect Conc. Release Rate Meas'ment Basis Conc. Release Rate Meas'ment Basis Annual Rate ELV Conc. mg/m3 g/s mg/m3 g/s tonne/yr mg/m3 1 Nitrous Oxide 2 Estimated* Full load 5 0.26386 annual avg 5 0.26386 hourly avg 7.6 2 Nitrogen Dioxide 200 10.5543 200 10.5543 304 200 3 Sulphur Dioxide (24 Hour Mean) 50 2.63858 50 2.63858 24 Hr Mean 76 50 4 Sulphur Dioxide (1 Hour Mean) 50 2.63858 50 2.63858 1 Hr Mean 76 5 Sulphur Dioxide (15 Min Mean) 50 2.63858 50 2.63858 15 Min 76 Mean 6 Particulates (PM10) (24 hr Mean) 10 0.52772 10 0.52772 24 hr Mean 15.2 10 7 Hydrogen chloride 10 0.52772 10 0.52772 15.2 10 8 Benzene 2 10 0.52772 10 0.52772 15.2 10 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 0.025 0.00132 0.025 0.00132 0.038 0.025 10 Mercury and compounds, except 0.05 0.00264 0.05 0.00264 0.076 0.05 mercury alkyls, (as 11 Arsenic and compounds 2 (as As) 0.056 0.00296 0.056 0.00296 0.09 0.056 12 Chromium ii & iii 2 0.05444 0.00287 0.05444 0.00287 0.08 0.056 13 Chromium (VI) 2 compounds (as Cr) 0.001111 5.9E-05 0.001111 5.9E-05 0.002 14 Lead 0.056 0.00296 0.056 0.00296 0.09 0.056 15 Nickel (total Ni compounds in the 0.056 0.00296 0.056 0.00296 0.09 0.056 PM10 fraction) 16 Ammonia (human health receptor) 10 0.52772 10 0.52772 15.2 17 Carbon monoxide 50 2.63858 50 2.63858 76 50 18 Hydrogen fluoride (as F) (Monthly 1 0.05277 Monthly 1 0.05277 1.52 1 Mean) Average 19 Nitrogen Dioxide (Ecological - Daily 200 10.5543 200 10.5543 Daily Mean Mean) 20 Ammonia (ecological receptor - 10 0.52772 10 0.52772 Sensitive Lichens) 21 Sulphur Dioxide (Ecological - 50 2.63858 50 2.63858 Sensitive Lichens)

Air Emissions Inventory Base Option 22 Dioxin & Furan 1E-07 5.3E-09 1E-07 5.3E-09 2.6E-07 0.0000001 Measurement method: * provide detail in comments box Comments

Energy Consumption Base Option Energy Consumption Please list all Energy Sources and Annual Consumption Select energy sources by Clicking on 'Add' and using the pull-down list. Number Energy Sources Delivered Conversion Factor Primary CO2 Factor CO2 MWh/yr MWh/yr tonne/yr 1 Electricity from public supply indirect emissions 3150 2.40 7,560 0.17 1,255 2 Gas oil direct emissions 4196 1.00 4,196 0.25 1,049 3 Waste - Imported Energy in Waste direct emissions 813750 1.00 813,750 0.19 156,647 4 Energy Recovered - Electricity Export indirect emissions -171948 2.40-412,675 0.17-68,504 5 Energy Recovered CHP Heat direct emissions Comments: -123244 1.00-123,244 0.25-30,811

Raw Materials Base Option Raw Materials Please list all Raw Materials Consumed: Number Material Annual Consumption Units 1 Non-potable Water 40500 tonnes/year 2 Potable Water 5096 tonnes/year 3 MSW and/or C&I Waste 300000 tonnes/year 4 Calcium Hydroxide 95% 8544 tonnes/year 5 Activated Carbon 91 tonnes/year 6 Ammonia 25% solution 744 tonnes/year 7 Hydrochloric Acid 75 tonnes/year 8 Sodium Hydroxide 38 tonnes/year Comments

Waste Inventory Base Option Waste Inventory Please list all Waste Streams emitted: Are there any Waste emissions? Yes Number Waste Stream Mass Category of Waste tonne/yr Disposal/Recovery Option 2 APCR 17,856 hazardous Landfill (D5) 1 Bottom Ash 67,364 other non-hazardous Other Recycling (R3:R4:R5:R11 and R12 3 Boiler Ash 1,504 other non-hazardous Other Recycling (R3:R4:R5:R11 and R12 4 Metals 5,700 inert Other Recycling (R3:R4:R5:R11 and R12 Comments

Module 3 - Quantify Impacts module 3 Introduction to Module 3 Module 3: Quantify Impacts The aim of this module is to quantify the effects on the environment of the emissions listed in the inventory in module 2. This guidance provides methods for assessing the ten main environmental considerations of most relevance to the PPC regime. Your emissions may not result in effects to all ten of these considerations, and the module allows you to screen out any that are not relevant. The emissions you entered in module 2 are automatically brought forward for assessment into each environmental consideration that is relevant for that type of emission (e.g. an emission may have more than one type of effect). This module allows you to screen out any emissions that are insignificant, and to identify those emissions where further, detailed assessment of the potential environemtnal impact may be required. IMPORTANT NOTE This software tool only completes PART of the requirements for module 3, as described above. Depending upon the degree of risk to the environment presented by the emissions, the operator may need to do further, detailed assessment of the potential effects using methodologies that are not provided here. This information should be submitted separately, as indicated within this module. TO CONTINUE WITH MODULE 3, PRESS "NEXT".

Identify relevant Impacts Identify Relevant Impacts Identify any environmental impacts that are not relevant to this assessment by deselecting from the list below: Emissions in Module 2? Yes Yes No No No Yes - Yes Yes Yes Air Deposition from Air to Land Water Noise Odour Waste Accidents Visual Ozone Creation Global Warming Justification for omission assessment for baseline LT & ST releases + GWP only no significant releases assessment of this impact should be carried out according to sector guidance assessment of this impact should be carried out according to sector guidance assessment of this impact should be carried out according to sector guidance included in planning assessment If you have deselected an environmental impact as not relevant to this assessment, no further assessment of this impact will be carried out

Local Environmental Quality Local Environmental Quality Describe the Quality of the Environment: Provide a brief description of the main local factors that may influence the importance of the impact of emissions in the surrounding environment Air Quality Are there any Environmental Quality Standards relating to substances released from the activities, which may be at risk due to additional contribution from the activity? (Environmental Quality Standards for air and water are described in IPPC Technical Guidance Notes) Are there any Local Air Quality Management Plans applicable to releases from the activity? Discussed in detailed AQ report Discussed in detailed AQ report Water Quality & Resources Are there any Environmental Quality Standards relating to substances released from the activities, which may be at risk due to additional contribution from the activity? Are proposals to abstract water satisfactory in order to obtain an abstraction licence? Is the activity located in a groundwater vulnerable zone (for activities with direct releases to land only)? Proximity to Sensitive Receptors Is public annoyance likely to be an issue for noise, odour or plume visibility? Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Are there any wildlife habitats, eg Special Areas of Conservation,or Special Protection Areas, likely to be affected by releases from the activity? (Description of requirements of Habitats Directive is provided in IPPC Technical Guidance Notes) Discussed in detailed AQ report

Air Impacts Base Option Air Impacts Calculate Process Contributions of Emissions to Air This table estimates the Process Contribution (PC), calculated as the maximum ground level concentration for each emission listed in the inventory, according to the release point parameters input earlier. If you have more accurate data obtained through dispersion modelling, this may be entered as indicated and will be used instead of the estimated PC. Long Term Short Term Number Substance EAL PC * Modelled Modelled PC EAL PC PC µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 1 Nitrous Oxide 2 1830 0.0889 5500 5.59 2 Nitrogen Dioxide 40 3.56 200 223 3 Sulphur Dioxide (24 Hour Mean) 0.889 125 55.9 4 Sulphur Dioxide (1 Hour Mean) 0.889 350 55.9 5 Sulphur Dioxide (15 Min Mean) 0.889 266 55.9 6 Particulates (PM10) (24 hr Mean) 40 0.178 50 11.2 7 Hydrogen chloride 0.178 750 11.2 8 Benzene 2 5 0.178 208 11.2 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 0.005 0.000445 0.0280 10 Mercury and compounds, except mercury alkyls, (as 0.25 0.000889 7.5 0.0559 11 Arsenic and compounds 2 (as As) 0.003 0.000995 15 0.0626 12 Chromium ii & iii 2 5 0.000968 150 0.0609 13 Chromium (VI) 2 compounds (as Cr) 0.0002 0.00001973 3 0.00125 14 Lead 0.5 0.000995 0.0626 15 Nickel (total Ni compounds in the PM10 fraction) 0.02 0.000995 0.0626 16 Ammonia (human health receptor) 180 0.178 2500 11.2 17 Carbon monoxide 0.889 10000 55.9 18 Hydrogen fluoride (as F) (Monthly Mean) 16 0.0231 160 1.12 19 Nitrogen Dioxide (Ecological - Daily Mean) 30 3.56 75 223 20 Ammonia (ecological receptor - Sensitive Lichens) 1 0.178 11.2 21 Sulphur Dioxide (Ecological - Sensitive Lichens) 10 0.889 55.9 22 Dioxin & Furan 0.000005 0.00000000 0.00000011 Note that the Process Contribution shown for each substance is the sum of the individual process contributions of each point from which the substance is emitted. Process Contributions obtained from modelling data should incorporate all relevant release points and flow conditions. µg/m3

Air Impacts Base Option * State the location of any detailed air dispersion modelling and also the main assumptions: Comments

Air Impact Screening Base Option Air Impact Screening Screen out Insignificant Emissions to Air This page displays the Process Contribution as a proportion of the EAL or EQS. Emissions with PCs that are less than the criteria indicated may be screened from further assessment as they are likely to have an insignificant impact. Long Term Short Term Long Term Short Term > 1% of Number Substance EAL EAL PC % PC of EAL EAL? PC % PC of EAL µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 % µg/m3 % 1 Nitrous Oxide 2 1,830 5,500 0.0889 0.00486 No 5.59 0.102 No > 10% of EAL? 2 Nitrogen Dioxide 40.0 200 3.56 8.89 Yes 223 112 Yes 3 Sulphur Dioxide (24-125 0.889-55.9 44.7 Yes Hour Mean) 4 Sulphur Dioxide (1-350 0.889-55.9 16.0 Yes Hour Mean) 5 Sulphur Dioxide - 266 0.889-55.9 21.0 Yes (15 Min Mean) 6 Particulates (PM10) 40.0 50.0 0.178 0.445 No 11.2 22.4 Yes (24 hr Mean) 7 Hydrogen chloride - 750 0.178-11.2 1.49 No 8 Benzene 2 5.00 208 0.178 3.56 Yes 11.2 5.38 No 9 Cadmium and its 0.00500-0.000445 8.89 Yes 0.0280 - compounds (as Cd) 10 Mercury and 0.251 7.51 0.000889 0.356 No 0.0559 0.745 No compounds, except mercury alkyls, (as 11 Arsenic and 0.00301 15.0 0.000995 33.2 Yes 0.0626 0.418 No compounds 2 (as As) 12 Chromium ii & iii 2 5.00 150 0.000968 0.0194 No 0.0609 0.0406 No 13 Chromium (VI) 2 0.000201 3.00 0.00001973 9.87 Yes 0.00125 0.0414 No compounds (as Cr) 14 Lead 0.501-0.000995 0.199 No 0.0626-15 Nickel (total Ni 0.0201-0.000995 4.98 Yes 0.0626 - compounds in the PM10 fraction) 16 Ammonia (human 180 2,500 0.178 0.0987 No 11.2 0.447 No health receptor) 17 Carbon monoxide - 10,000 0.889-55.9 0.559 No 18 Hydrogen fluoride 16.0 160 0.0231 0.145 No 1.12 0.699 No

Air Impact Screening Base Option (as F) (Monthly Mean) 19 Nitrogen Dioxide 30.0 75.0 3.56 11.9 Yes 223 298 Yes (Ecological - Daily Mean) 20 Ammonia (ecological receptor - Sensitive Lichens) 1.000-0.178 17.8 Yes 11.2-21 Sulphur Dioxide 10.00-0.889 8.89 Yes 55.9 - (Ecological - Sensitive Lichens) 22 Dioxin & Furan 0.00000500-0.00000000 0.0356 No 0.00000011 -

Air Impact Modelling Base Option Identify need for Detailed Modelling of Emissions to Air Number Air Impact Modelling This page displays the Process Contributions in relation to the backgound pollutant levels and the EAL or EQS. You should use this information to decide whether to conduct detailed modelling. Note that releases that are insignificant are not shown as they are screened from further assessment. Also complete this page if you have already done detailed modelling. Long Term Short Term Substance Air Bkgrnd Conc. µg/m3 PC µg/m3 % PC of headroom (EAL - PEC % PEC of EAL µg/m3 % PC µg/m3 % PC of headroom (EAL - Bkgrnd) 2 Nitrogen Dioxide 21.3 3.56 19.0 24.9 62.2 223 142 3 Sulphur Dioxide (24 Hour Mean) 4.4 0.889-0 - 55.9 48.1 4 Sulphur Dioxide (1 Hour Mean) 4.4 0.889-0 - 55.9 16.4 5 Sulphur Dioxide (15 Min Mean) 4.4 0.889-0 - 55.9 21.8 6 Particulates (PM10) (24 hr Mean) 15.8 0.178 0.735 0 0 11.2 60.8 8 Benzene 2 0.9 0.178 4.34 1.08 21.6 11.2 5.42 9 Cadmium and its compounds (as Cd) 0.00009 0.000445 9.05 0.000535 10.7 0.0280-11 Arsenic and compounds 2 (as As) 0.0005 0.000995 39.8 0.00150 49.9 0.0626 0.418 13 Chromium (VI) 2 compounds (as Cr) 0.00006 0.00001973 14.1 0.00007973 39.9 0.00125 0.0414 15 Nickel (total Ni compounds in the PM10 fraction) 0.00086 0.000995 5.20 0.00186 9.28 0.0626-19 Nitrogen Dioxide (Ecological - Daily Mean) 3.56 - - - 223-20 Ammonia (ecological receptor - Sensitive Lichens) 0.178 - - - 11.2-21 Sulphur Dioxide (Ecological - Sensitive Lichens) 0.889 - - - 55.9 -

Air Impact Modelling Assessment Air Impact Modelling Assessment See guidelines in H1 Document Describe here the justification for whether detailed modelling is, or is not required for any of the releases. Refer to the quidelines in H1 Annex F Nox is screened out by Dispersion Modelling as being insignficant. Describe source of background information: Document Reference of detailed modelling work:

Ozone Creation Potential Base Option Photochemical Ozone Creation Impacts Number Substance Annual Rate POCP Value POCP tonne/yr per tonne 8 Benzene 2 15.20 21.8 331.36 17 Carbon monoxide 76.00 2.7 205.20 2 Nitrogen Dioxide 304.00 2.8 851.20 19 Nitrogen Dioxide (Ecological - Daily Mean) 2.8 5 Sulphur Dioxide (15 Min Mean) 76.00 4.8 364.80 Total: 1,752.56 Comments

Global Warming Impact Base Option Global Warming Potential Impacts Substance Source Annual Rate GWP Value Annual GWP tonne/yr per tonne C02 Energy: direct direct emissions 694,702.00 1.00 126,884.88 C02 Energy: indirect indirect emissions -168,798.00 1.00-67,249.12 Nitrous Oxide 2 Process: direct A1 (Stack 1) 7.60 310.00 2,356.00 Comments: Total: 61,991.75

Waste Impacts Base Option Waste Impact Score Calculation Number Waste Stream Mass Final treatment or disposal method (Score) Waste Type (Score) Impact Score 2 APCR 17,856 Landfill (D5) 30 hazardous 10 5356800 3 Boiler Ash 1,504 Other Recycling (R3:R4:R5:R11 and R12) 3 other non-hazardous 2 9024 1 Bottom Ash 67,364 Other Recycling (R3:R4:R5:R11 and R12) 3 other non-hazardous 2 404184 4 Metals 5,700 Other Recycling (R3:R4:R5:R11 and R12) 3 inert 1 17100 Comments

Waste Screening Impacts Base Option Waste Impact Screening Number Waste Stream Screen Out? Reason for Screening Impact Score 2 APCR Yes Final product of waste treatment 5356800 3 Boiler Ash Yes Final product of waste treatment 9024 1 Bottom Ash Yes Final product of waste treatment 404184 4 Metals Yes Recycled product of waste treatment 17100 Total Impact Score: 5787108 Comments

Summary Tables Summary Tables Print or Preview summary tables: Choose a summary table Air Waste Ozone Creation Global Warming Preview Print

Air Short Term Substance Graph Base Option 120% 100% 80% 60% No Data Available 40% 20% 0% Ammonia (human Benzene 2 Chromium (VI) 2 Hydrogen chloride Mercury and compounds, Nitrogen Dioxide Particulates (PM10) (24 hr Sulphur Dioxide (1 Air Short Term Effects - Comparison by Substance % Contribution / EAL Substances Process Contribution: 1 Background Contribution

Air Long Term Substance Graph Base Option 120% 100% 80% 60% No Data Available 40% 20% 0% Ammonia (ecological Arsenic and compounds Cadmium and its Chromium ii & iii 2 Hydrogen fluoride (as Mercury and compounds, Nitrogen Dioxide Nitrous Oxide 2 Sulphur Dioxide Air Long Term Effects - Comparison by Substance % Contribution / EAL Substance Release Point: 1 Background Contribution

Ozone Creation Substance Graph Ozone Creation - Substance Comparison 2000.00 1800.00 1600.00 Ozone Creation Potential 1400.00 1200.00 1000.00 800.00 600.00 No Data Available Sulphur Dioxide (15 Min Mean) Nitrogen Dioxide Carbon monoxide Benzene 2 400.00 200.00 0.00 1 Options

Global Warming Substance Graph Global Warming - Substance Comparison 150000.00 100000.00 Global Warming Potential 50000.00 0.00 No Data Available 1 Nitrous Oxide 2 Process: direct C02 Energy: indirect C02 Energy: direct -50000.00-100000.00 Options

Waste Impact Graph Waste - Option Comparison 1.20 1.00 0.80 No Data Available Score 0.60 Normalised Impact 0.40 0.20 0.00 1 Options

Summary of Environmental Assessment Summary of Environmental Assessment You have now completed all of the steps in this software for the environmental assessment. This will provide you with: an inventory of all emissions sources and substances emitted from your activities an information trail of how the impacts of these emissions have been assessed a summary of the impacts You now need to use this information to confirm whether the emissions are acceptable, i.e. that they do not cause significant pollution to occur, by responding below: Do any of the emissions exceed any of the folllowing Statutory Emission limit values: Environmental Quality Standards (air and water): Environmental Assessment Levels: No No No If yes, identify the substances concerned and improvements that are needed to at least meet the statutory requirement If yes, identify the substances concerned, the contribution from the activities and investigate whether further detailed fate and effect modelling and/or pollution controls are needed. Ensure that the relevant EQS reference conditions are applied. If yes, identify the substances concerned, the contribution from the activities and investigate whether further detailed fate and effect modelling and/or pollution controls are needed. Use the box below to provide further information on any of the above to which you have responded 'Yes': Finally, print all of the information and submit with your application. Remember to include any supplementary information and reports that you have had made reference to during the assessment procedure.