Delivering Valued Genomic Products to Livestock Customers

Similar documents
TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

SELECTION FOR IMPROVED FEED EFFICIENCY: A GENOMICS APPROACH. Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

TECHNICAL BULLETIN GENEMAX FOCUS - EVALUATION OF GROWTH & GRADE FOR COMMERCIAL USERS OF ANGUS GENETICS. November 2016

BLUP and Genomic Selection

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale

Local Genetic Adaptation in Beef Cattle Jared Decker Assistant Professor Beef Genetics Specialist Computational Genomics

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

UNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

Experiences in the use of genomics in ruminants in Uruguay

Fundamentals of Genomic Selection

COW CALF BREEDING AND GENETICS. Dhuyvetter

The Data Which Breeders May Collect For BREEDPLAN Analysis Includes: Flight time (from bail head to light beam)

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

Igenity. Gold and Igenity Silver Results Key DNA profiles for crossbred and straightbred cattle. Maternal traits drive production:

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

Janssen Re d An g u s

Introduction to Indexes

Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design

International Livestock Registry

Importance of Feed Efficiency

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIV November 17, 18 and 19, 2015, Loveland, Colorado HOW TO USE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE GENOMIC PREDICTIONS

Can Selection Indexes Improve Profitability in Beef Cattle

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

TSB Collaborative Research: Utilising i sequence data and genomics to improve novel carcass traits in beef cattle

Genomic prediction. Kevin Byskov, Ulrik Sander Nielsen and Gert Pedersen Aamand. Nordisk Avlsværdi Vurdering. Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Practical integration of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes

Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle

Operation of a genomic selection service in Ireland

Angus & SimAngus Bull Sale

Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency

View Report Details. Global Animal Health Market Report

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

ECONOMICALLY RELEVANT TRAITS AND SELECTION INDICES

Developments in the Genetic Improvement of a Large Commercial Population in the New Zealand Sheep Industry

1 This research was conducted under cooperative agreements between USDA, ARS, Montana Agric. Exp.

Australian Red Angus Selection Indexes

FOR ANIMALS FOR HEALTH FOR YOU

Selection for Marbling and the Impact on Maternal Traits

Animal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle

Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs using genomic selection

Revolutionizing genetics in the cattle industry. Extensive toolset. Proven technology. Collaborative approach.

Production Records for Cow/Calf Producers Sandy Johnson, Beef specialist Bob Weaber, Cow/calf specialist

gepds for commercial beef cattle John Basarab, John Crowley & Donagh Berry Livestock Gentec Conference, October 2016 Edmonton, Canada

Wagyu 101. Michael Scott Certified Executive Chef Academy of Chefs Corporate Chef for Rosewood Ranches Texas Raised Wagyu Beef

Spotted Profits VS. Solid Profits Jessica Leetch AGEC 4960 March 1, 2010

Dairy Cattle Backgrou d I for atio

Genomic selection and its potential to change cattle breeding

ORGANIZATION OF ON-FARM BREEDING PLANS FOR BEEF CATTLE R.G. BEILHARZ* Summary

Residual Feed Intake: Sustainability and Meat Quality

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Illinois 4-H Livestock Record

Prediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Improving fertility through management and genetics.

19. WORLD SIMMENTAL FLECKVIEH CONGRESS. The robust Fleckvieh cow breeding for fitness and health

Breeding Program of the Bulgarian Murrah Buffalo

Crossbreeding Systems in Beef Cattle 1

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

2

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Invited Review. Value of genomics in breeding objectives for beef cattle

Establishment of a Single National Selection Index for Canada

Beef Performance Testing: Questions and Answers

An integrated approach to expand marketing. producers from value-added heifers and steers

Guidelines For Uniform Beef Improvement Programs

B+LNZ Genetics for the Commercial Farmer. Max Tweedie

What could the pig sector learn from the cattle sector. Nordic breeding evaluation in dairy cattle

Estrus Synchronization Planning for Success

Beef Cattle Genomics: Promises from the Past, Looking to the Future

Beef Improvement New Zealand Inc.

Herd Summary Definitions

CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Tools to Assist Genetic Improvement in Central Australia Selecting cattle best suited to the environment and markets

Development of economic selection indices for beef cattle improvement Kathleen P. Ochsner, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Daniela Lourenco, Un. of Georgia 6/1/17. Pedigree. Individual 1. Individual 2

A journey: opportunities & challenges of melding genomics into U.S. sheep breeding programs

Bred to Solve Problems, Not Create Them

Crossbreeding Back to the Future David A. Daley California State University, Chico

A SELECTION INDEX FOR ONTARIO DAIRY ORGANIC FARMS

International Flows of Animal Genetic Resources: An Economic and Biological Analysis

What Makes Gelbvieh a Key

Fixed Time Artificial Insemination

Canada s Dairy Industry at a Glance

Use of genomic tests and sexed semen increase genetic level within herd

Transcription:

Delivering Valued Genomic Products to Livestock Customers Sue DeNise, Ph.D. Sr. Director, Global Genetics R&D Veterinary Medicine Research and Development Predict The Future Now! 1

Who We Are u A Pfizer business u A leading global animal health company u Working to assure a safe, sustainable global food supply from healthy beef and dairy cattle, swine, poultry, sheep and fish u Helping dogs, cats and horses live healthier longer lives

What We Do A leader in discovery, development, and manufacture of veterinary vaccines & medicines 5000+ colleagues worldwide including 800+ veterinary R&D scientists and specialists Diverse portfolio of leading veterinary products & services for livestock & companion animals

PAH Global R&D Network Genetics Businesses Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Charles City Iowa College Park Maryland Zaventem Belgium Mumbai (Thane) India Lincoln Nebraska Kalamazoo Michigan Olot Spain Dunedin New Zealand Shanghai China Bri=sh Columbia Canada Kansas City Missouri Sao Paolo Brazil Lyon France New Delhi India Melbourne Australia Genetics Business Locations

PAH Leads Industry in Global R&D Investment R&D Spend (in $Millions) 240M PAH R&D $321 million Strategic Investments Include: ü Animal Gene=cs ü Diagnos=cs ü Emerging Infec=ous Diseases 206M 166M 127M 122M 115M 56M 48M 30M Pfizer Merck Merial Elanco, Bayer BIVI Novartis CEVA Virbac Vétoquinol Janssen Sources: Pfizer Animal Health actual 2010 R&D spend. Vetnosis July 29, 2011 Income Statement Report of 2010 R&D spend for other animal health companies.

Why Genetics The Challenge Source: Food Economics and Consumer Choice (Simmons, 2008)

Genomic Tools for Dairy Cattle CONFIDENTIAL 7

U.S Holstein Gene0c Trend Sires and Elite Dams 1000 800 AIPL Bull PTA AIPL Cow PTA Units of Trait 600 400 200 0-200 - 400-600 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Birth Year Gene=c Gap 8

What is CLARIFIDE for Dairy? A Portfolio of Predictions and Tools to Implement Genetic Improvement of Commercial Dairy Females A panel of 6,900 (LD) and 50,000 (50K) genetic markers USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL) Derived from 54,001 (50K) marker panel test Delivers genomic predictions for: Holstein, Jersey, and Brown Swiss 30 production, health and type traits 9 composite indexes Includes markers to: Authenticate parentage Bolster reliability of genetic predictions Help manage inbreeding

CLARIFIDE Empowers Female Selection Realiability 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 NM$ PL SCS DPR Milk Fat Prot Parent Avg Reliability CLARIFIDE 6K Reliability Based on CLARIFIDE in Holstein Cattle. Pfizer Animal Genetics, Data on File

What s a SNP Genotype Worth? Pedigree is equivalent to information on about 7 daughters For the protein yield (h 2 =0.30), the SNP genotype provides information equivalent to an additional 34 daughters John Cole: aipl.arsusda.gov/publish/presentations/.../ NCSU_2012_jbc.pptx

What s a SNP Genotype Worth? And for daughter pregnancy rate (h 2 =0.04), SNP = 131 daughters John Cole: aipl.arsusda.gov/publish/presentations/.../ncsu_2012_jbc.pptx

Genomic Predictions Upper Midwest Dairy (n=240) Actual Milk Production (ME305) 47.000 45.000 43.000 41.000 39.000 37.000 35.000 33.000 31.000 29.000 27.000 25.000 23.000 21.000 19.000 17.000 15.000 Based on CLARIFIDE in Holstein Cattle. Pfizer Animal Genetics, Data on File R² = 0.2673 Correlation = 0.52-1.500-1.250-1.000-750 -500-250 0 250 500 750 1.000 1.250 1.500 1.750 CLARIFIDE Milk Genomic Prediction Based on AIPL Predictions (DGV April 2011)

Strategies for Accelerating the Female Genetic Improvement CONFIDENTIAL 14

Real World Example: Strategic Breeding California Dairy Customer is using sexed semen in bejer heifers to improve quality of future female progeny Strategic alloca0on of sexed semen in top 50% of gpta heifers for Net Merit $ 15

Real World Example: Strategic Breeding Future progeny of California Dairy will increased genetic progress 134% or $ 224 Net Merit in the next heifer generation 450 400 391 350 Average NM$ 300 250 200 150 126 167 Cows Heifers Future Progeny 100 50-16

Dairy Solutions Provider Nutri=on Reproduc=on Milk Quality Gene=cs Health Ø Comprehensive porzolio of products and services Ø Deliver solu0ons for technical business challenges Ø Strive to earn a place in dairy management teams

Partnering to Deliver Genomic Products American Angus Assoc. ANCP Red Angus Assoc NAPCo Ovita CONFIDENTIAL 18

Features of HD 50K for Angus Parentage HD 50K Traits GE-EPDs & Ranks Calving Ease Direct Birth Weight Weaning Weight Yearling Weight Dry Matter Intake (RADG) Residual Feed Intake Yearling Height Scrotal Circumference Docility Calving Ease Maternal Milking Ability Mature Weight Mature Height Carcass Weight Fat Thickness Ribeye Area Marbling Score Tenderness

HD 50K Information is Integrated into EPDs, Indexes and Accuracy Values Lot 1 Pfizer Example Reg. No: Tattoo: GE- EPDs simplify selec0on, ma0ng and marke0ng because all available data is integrated, removing the need to consider individual sources of trait informa0on.

Trait Average Change in EPD from HD 50K 1 Average Change in Accuracy with HD 50K from.05 2 Accuracy Approximate Progeny Equivalents CED ±1.6 units.24 14 BW ±.45 lb.25 8 WW ±2.2 lbs.23 16 YW ±3.1 lbs.27 20 RADG ±.03 lbs/day.27 13 YH ±.10 in.29 8 SC ±.12 cm.30 9 Doc ±2.9 units.25 8 Milk ±1.2 lbs.15 12 MW ±14 lbs.29 7 CW ±4.1 lbs.17 7 Marb ±.08 units.24 12 RE ±.10 in 2.23 9 FAT ±.01 in.23 11 1 Derived from animals with.30 accuracy. 2 Accuracy from pedigree only

Acquiring Technology Sponsored Research Academic Ins0tu0ons CSIRO License Technology Ovita Australian CSIRO Gene0c Condi0ons Internal R&D Nelore predic0ons Global Angus predic0ons Collabora0ve research Angus Gene0c, Inc. Large Pastoral Companies R&D Pipeline Decisions Customer focused 22

Integrated Solutions Path Forward v Can we use synergies to develop complete solutions for our customer s challenges? v Health Traits v Diagnostic tools to refine genomics v Rational use of Pharma/ biopharma products

CONFIDENTIAL 24