USDA-ARS Developed Technologies for Recovering Manure Phosphorus. Ariel A. Szogi

Similar documents
2/19/2013. Manure Management Introduction Thermochemical Technologies Introduction and Advantages

Improving Nutrient Management for Animal Production Systems. Dr. Tom Sims College of Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Delaware

Streamlined Ammonia Removal from Wastewater Using Biological Deammonification Process

AMMONIA REMOVAL FROM DIGESTED SLUDGE SUPERNATANT

Availability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Struvia Technology for Phosphorus Recovery. o Re-Water Braunschweig November 2015

PART XI Utilization of Organic Wastes as Nutrient Sources and Soil Amendments

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Swine Manure Production and Nutrient Content

Many systems are. Manure Utilization and Treatment Technologies Land application

This page is for on-line indexing purposes and should not be included in your printed version.

Lagoon And Wetland Treatment Of Dairy Manure

Manure Management. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management. June 2, Jarrod O. Miller, Ph.D. Extension Educator, Agriculture

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014

Closing the Phosphorus (P) cycle and manure processing

The Science of Integrated Crop Livestock Systems

MANURE SOLIDS SEPARATORS

Analysis of chicken litter

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

final report Water quality improvement strategy for a processing site

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLANS: MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRODUCTION OBJECTIVES

Using Compost and Animal Manure as a Florida BMP on Vegetable Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D.

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, From: G. Albrecht P. Ristow

FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE PRICE OF MANURE AS A FERTILIZER Ray Massey, Economist University of Missouri, Commercial Ag Program

PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE USING THE AQUACRITOX SUPERCRITICAL WATER OXIDATION PROCESS

BERMUDAGRASS YIELD RESPONSE TO IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN IN THE SOUTHEASTERN COASTAL PLAIN

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Interventions to close the P cycle in The Netherlands

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

APPLICATION OF SWINE LAGOON WATER TO CORN AND ALFALFA INTRODUCTION

Poultry production is the number one agricultural

Current Nutrient Management Strategies for Poultry Production. Josh B. Payne, Ph.D. Animal Waste Mgmt. Specialist

Manure, Crops and Soil Health Jeff Schoenau PAg Department of Soil Science S.S. Malhi AAFC Melfort

Poultry Litter as a Renewable Resource. Fibrominn Biomass Power Plant

Biogas Energy Potential in Alberta

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Life cycle analysis of ethanol: issues, results, and case simulations

Anaerobic Digestion. Waste to Energy Workshop for Farm, Food Processing, & Wood Industries. Presented To:

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua has Positive Long-Term Effects. Biological Help for the Human Race

Water Quality in~eorgia Georgia s Agricultural Waste Regulations

A Case Study from EP3: Pollution Prevention Assessment from a Cattle Hide Tannery. HBI Pub. 10/31/94

PANEL: Making a resource into the right source

Calculating the fertilizer value of manure from livestock operations J.A. Moore and M.J. Gamroth

Nitrogen and phosphorus removal rates using small algal turfs grown with dairy manure

The leather industry is considered in all the World as a contaminant and dirty industry.

The University of Wisconsin-Platteville

Livestock Waste Technologies for Energy Production and Pollution Control A Global Perspective

SAMPLE FARM Nutrient Management Plan

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. (Ac.) CODE 590

AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION AND AUTOMATION Vol. II - Animal Solid Manure: Storage, Handling and Disposal - José R. Bicudo

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

SOLUTIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT

Aus dem Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Agrarstruktur und ländliche Räume

Virginia Tech Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences. Managing Animal Manure Nutrients for Optimum Yields and Water Quality. Rory Maguire Virginia Tech

Field Evaluation of a Two-Stage Liquid-Solid Separation System at a California Dairy

Poultry in the Chesapeake Bay Program s Phase 6 Watershed Model

Jactone Arogo Ogejo and John Ignosh ; Virginia Tech Stephanie Lansing and Gary Felton, University of Maryland

Presented By: Kevin Bossy. The Supplier Perspective: Accelerating the Adoption of Innovative Solutions

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 22 Lecture 8

A G U I D E T O ed. Composter Location

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

UBC BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY GROUP COMMUNITY DRIVEN BIOSOLIDS RESEARCH

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Welcome to the Web Conference U.S. Dairy Industry s Report National Market Value of Anaerobic Digester Products April 11, 2013

New anaerobic technologies More biogas at lower costs

The AgSTAR Program. Managing Manure with Biogas Recovery Systems. Improved Performance at Competitive Costs 1EPA

MANITOBA CONSERVATION USE OF A CENTRIFUGE FOR LIQUID/SOLID MANURE SEPARATION

No-till, Nitrogen and Manure Management

TECHNOLOGY REPORT: ANAEROBIC LAGOON AND SPRAYFIELD

Growing Our Energy Agricultural Waste-to-Energy Renewable Energy Generation and GHG Emission Reductions via Innovative Waste Management

ARE ALL fertilizers the same? Of

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

FERTILIZERS, MANURE, OR BIOSOLIDS?

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Form 2L - Land Application of Industrial Wastewater and/or Sludge

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Anaerobic digestion of livestock effluents and energy crops in Italy

Land Application of Biosolids Rules, Regulations and Benefits EPA regulations, under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503 (40 CFR 503) -

Chapter 2 FEASIBILITY OF ADOPTING PHOSPHORUS-ROTATION LIMITS VERSUS NITROGEN LIMITS FOR MANURE APPLICATION 2.1 INDEX

RecoveRy of nutrients for a SuStainable agricultural fertilization

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

How to define performance parameters for verification including parameters relevant for energy efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

The Biology of Composting

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Purple phototrophic bacteria for nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater treatment

Laboratory Fee Schedule

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

Soil, Manure, and Monitoring Well Testing in Georgia by: Dr. Paul F. Vendrell, Dr. Parshall B. Bush, Dr. David E. Kissel, and Dr. Leticia S.

LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

The Fate of Ammonia in Facultative Lagoon Sludge Treatment Processes: An Investigation of Methods for Reducing Ammonia in Recycle Streams:

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD METHODS TO ESTIMATE MANURE PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT CHARACTERISTICS FROM DAIRY CATTLE

Transcription:

USDA-ARS Developed Technologies for Recovering Manure Phosphorus Ariel A. Szogi AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE Coastal Plains Soil, Water and Plant research Center Florence, SC

Summary Environmental issues animal production Recoverable manure nutrients Phosphorus recovery from: - liquid swine manure - poultry litter

Environmental Issues Sustainability of Animal Production Pollution concerns because of excess soil N & P Export or spatial transfer of nutrients with animal feed Imbalance of N:P ratio in animal waste

Animal Manure Excess P Percent of Agronomic Crop and Forage Phosphorus Needs Supplied by Recoverable Plant Available Manure Phosphorus at the County Level in North Carolina % 0-10 10-40 40-70 70-100 > 100 Barker & Zublena, 1995 Barker, J.C., and J.P. Zublena. 1995. Livestock nutrient assessment in North Carolina. p. 98 106. In Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Agric. & Food Proc Wastes. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.

N:P Ratio Selected Crops Crop N:P ratio Bermudagrass 13.4:1 Tall fescue 11.9:1 Corn 7.5:1 Cotton 6.2:1 Ryegrass 3.3:1 Liquid swine manure 3.2* Poultry litter 2.1:1 to 2.6:1 Source: Edwards and Daniels, 1992; *Barker and Zublena, 1995 Edwards, D.R., and T.C. Daniel. 1992, Environmental impacts of on-farm poultry waste disposal. Bioresour. Technol. 41:9-33.

Livestock Manure Recycling of Excess P Manure P Recycling Utilization Valuable byproducts?

Recoverable Manure P How much? Quantity of the nutrient available for land application or utilization for other purposes Mass of nutrient per ton of manure remaining after nutrient losses during manure collection, transfer, storage, and treatment Total U.S. annual production of recoverable P 2 O 5 = 650 M kg with 480 M kg in excess of on-farm needs 18% Annual U.S. consumption P 2 O 5 =1,680 M kg (PPI, 2002) Recovery of manure P could substitute about 25% of annual U.S. consumption of P 38% Source: USDA-ERS (Kellog et al. 2000) 19% 8% 17% Cattle Dairy Other Swine Poultry Kellogg, R.L., C.H. Lander, D.C. Moffitt, and N. Gollehon. 2000. Manure nutrients relative to the capacity of cropland and pastureland to assimilate nutrients: Spatial and temporal trends for the United States. NRCS and ERS GSA Publ. No. nps00-0579. Washington, D.C.

Manure Transfer How Far? Source: Keplinger and Hauck, 2006 Keplinger, K.O., and L.M. Hauck. 2006. The economics of manure utilization: Model and application. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 31, 424-440.

Cost in Dollars per Ton Global Use of Fertilizers World fertilizer prices soar: merge of food and fuel economies Average U.S. Farm Prices of Selected Fertilizers 900 800 700 600 500 Urea 45-46% Nitrogen Super-phosphate 44-46% phosphate 400 300 200 100 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Time in years Source: USDA-ERS, Fertilizer Use and Prices. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/fertilizeruse/

Utilization Valuable byproducts? Compost Phosphates Organic soil amendments

Nutrients Recovered from Swine Manure Compost N & P Phosphate

USDA-ARS Wastewater Treatment System Phosphorus Removal and Recovery from Liquid Swine Manure FIG. 1 LIME OR CA/MG HYDROXIDE DISPENSER INFLUENT WITH AMMONIA PHOSPHORUS ALKALINITY NITRIFICATION BIOREACTOR PHOSPHORUS SEPARATION REACTOR EFFLUENT WITH NITRATE PHOSPHATE PRECIPITATE Wastewater Treatment System U.S. Patent 6,893,567 B1

60 50 40 30 20 10 Enhanced Phosphorus Removal from Swine Manure Using New Process New Process P removed from liquid (mg/l) Conventional 0 1 5 10 Calcium hydroxide rates (Moles / mol P)

Environmentally Superior Technology (EST) State of North Carolina Permitable by government authority Technically, operationally and economically feasible Meets these environmental performance standards: Eliminate discharge to surface and groundwater Substantially eliminate ammonia emissions Substantially eliminate odor emissions beyond farm boundaries Substantially eliminate pathogens Substantially eliminate nutrient and heavy metal contamination of soil and water.

EST 1 st generation, Super Soils USA System New manure treatment system developed to replace hog lagoons in North Carolina. NC Attorney General Smithfield Foods/PSF Agreement Goshen Ridge Farm, Duplin Co., NC 4,360-finishing pig production unit Raw ManureTreated: 39 m 3 /day Phosphorus Recovery Nitrification/ Denitrification Solid-liquid Separation Wastewater Treatment System US Patent # 6,893,567 Vanotti, Szogi and Hunt

EST On-Farm Treatment System Solid-liquid Separation Module Nitrification Denitrification Module Phosphorus Removal Module Effluent Swine Houses Reuse Separated solids Calcium Phosphate 70% TP Mass Removed w/solids Compost 25% TP Mass Removed from Liquid Stream 95% TP Removed from Farm

2003-2004 Suspended Solids Volatile solids System Performance INFLUENT (mg/l) EFFLUENT (mg/l) Efficiency (%) 11,051 264 98 8,035 85 99 TKN 1,584 23 99 TAN 872 11 99 COD 16,138 445 97 BOD 3,132 10 100 TP 576 29 95 Cu 26.8 0.36 99 Zn 26.3 0.25 99

Separated Solids

Manure solids processed into plant growth media

Step 3: Phosphorus Removal P Separation Module

Dewatering and bagging of calcium phosphate P sludge production = 700 kg/year Recovered P in sludge = 99.5% 4,360 Finishers Production Unit

2 nd Generation EST

2 nd Generation System: 5600-finishing pigs in North Carolina Solid-liquid Separation Nitrification/denitr. Phosphorus and pathogens System Effluent Homogenization tank Vanotti, Szogi, Fetterman, U.S. Patent 7,674,379 B2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2010.

Benefits of new technology have potential to pay for all the cost of treatment Anaerobic Lagoon Technology 2 nd Generation Superior Technology $ / 1000 lb SSLW / year Treatment Cost 90 132 Carbon Credits Benefits Productivity Enhancement Benefits 0 32 0 120

Benefits of new technology have potential to pay for all the cost of treatment Anaerobic Lagoon Technology 2 nd Generation Superior Technology $ / 1000 lb SSLW / year Treatment Cost 90 132 Carbon Credits Benefits Productivity Enhancement Benefits 0 32 0 120

Compost Swine Manure Solids Constituent Percentage Total N 5.3 Total P 4.0 Calcium 2.3 Potassium 0.5 Magnesium 2.1 Separated solids composted with cotton gin residue

Recovered Phosphates Chemical Composition Constituent Percentage P 2 O 5 24.4 Calcium 27.3 Potassium 0.9 Magnesium 1.8 SEM X 1200

Recovered P Swine Manure Fertilizer Manufacture Recovered P Compacted Crushed Sieved Photos: ARS & IFDC Final Product

Poultry Litter Manure + Bedding Material

Nutrients Recovered from Poultry Litter USDA-ARS Florence, SC Washed Solids Recovered P Process selectively extracts up to 80 percent of the phosphorus from poultry litter, but little of the nitrogen It produces two useful materials: - The washed solids, with a balanced N:P ratio for crop production - A "slow-release phosphorus fertilizer ARS has granted an exclusive license to Renewable Organics LLC, of N.C., for the commercial development of the process

Poultry Litter Phosphorus Removal and Recovery Quick Wash (Chemical) Process 1 2 3 Poultry Litter P extraction Acidic solution P removal Alkaline ph P precipitation enhancement Liquid Effluent Washed Litter Recovered P Szogi et al. Process for removing and recovering phosphorus from animal waste. Patent Appl. No. 20090193863. U.S. Patent Office. Washington, DC.

% of Initial Total N % of Initial Total P Quick Wash 100 80 60 A) Phosphorus Left in Solids Extracted 40 Selective Extraction of Phosphorus 20 0 Water (ph 8.1) Acid (ph 4.5) B) Nitrogen 100 80 Left in Solids Extracted 60 40 20 0 Water (ph 8.1) Acid (ph 4.5) Control Treatment N:P 1.8:1 5.8:1

Manure Wash Pilot Experiment

Quick Wash Step 2 P removal Lime addition ph 9-10 Step 3 P enhancement Flocculant addition (PAM -)

. Quick Wash Products Poultry litter after quick wash P recovered from poultry litter

Phosphorus material recovered from poultry litter using the Quick Wash process Constituent Mean g per 100 g Phosphorus 5.9 P 2 O 5 13.5 Carbon 23.8 Nitrogen 2.4 Calcium 13.4 Magnesium 1.0 Potassium 1.1 Sodium 0.3

Use of Recovered Phosphate as Fertilizer Green house tests using P recovered from: 1) pig manure (RPM), and 2) from poultry litter (RPL) Applied at 0, 20, 40, 80 and160 mg/kg soil Commercial triple super phosphate (TSP) was used as fertilizer control Plant : Annual ryegrass Soil: Uchee sand Amendment: Lime (ph ~6.5) Air temperature: 25.5 32.0 o C Biomass harvested @: 19, 34, and 47 d after planting

Biomass (g pot -1 ) Effect of fertilizer material and P rate on ryegrass biomass 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 LSD 0.05 Control RPM RPL TSP 2.0 1.0 0.0 0 22 44 88 176 P Rate (mg P kg soil -1 ) RPM, P recovered from pig manure; RPL, P from poultry litter; TSP, triple superphosphate.

Conclusions Nutrient recovery technologies offer the opportunity to resolve problems of excess application of manure phosphorus to land. N & P concentration in manure byproducts should be sufficiently high to allow long distance transportation. The aspect of P recovery and reuse is important for the global cycling of these nutrients (e.g.: energy savings and limited resource).

Relevant References: USDA-ARS Developed Technologies for Recovering Manure Bauer, P., A.A. Szogi, and M.B. Vanotti. 2007. Agronomic effectiveness of calcium phosphate recovered from liquid swine manure. Agron. J. 99:1352 1356. Szogi, A.A., M.B. Vanotti, and P.G. Hunt. 2006. Dewatering of phosphorus extracted from liquid swine waste. Bioresour. Technol. 97:183 190. Szogi, A.A., and M.B. Vanotti. 2008. Removal of phosphorus from livestock effluents. J. Environ. Qual. 38:576-586. Szogi, A.A., M.B. Vanotti, and P.G. Hunt. 2008. Process for removing and recovering phosphorus from animal waste. Patent Application Serial No. 20090193863. U.S. Patent Office. Washington, DC. Szogi, A.A., M.B. Vanotti, and P.G. Hunt. 2008. Phosphorus recovery from poultry litter. Trans. ASABE 51:1727-1734. Szogi, A.A., and M.B.Vanotti. 2009. Prospects for the recovery of phosphorus from poultry litter. Bioresour. Technol. 100:5461-5465. Szogi, A., P. Bauer, and M. Vanotti. 2009. Agronomic effectiveness of phosphorus materials recovered from manure. Bulgarian Journal of Ecological Science Ecology and Future 8:9-12. Szogi, A.A., P.J. Bauer, and M.B. Vanotti. 2010. Fertilizer effectiveness of phosphorus recovered from broiler litter. Agron. J. 102:723-727. Vanotti, M.B., A.A. Szogi, and P.G. Hunt. 2003. Extraction of soluble phosphorus from swine wastewater. Trans. ASAE 46:1665 1674. Vanotti, M.B., A.A. Szogi, and P.G. Hunt. 2005. Wastewater treatment system. U.S. Patent 6893,567 B1. Vanotti, M.B., A.A. Szogi, P.G. Hunt, P.D. Millner, and F.J. Humenik. 2007. Development of environmentally superior treatment system to replace anaerobic swine lagoons in the USA. Bioresour. Technol. 98:3184 3194. Vanotti, M.B., A.A. Szogi, P.D. Millner, and J.H. Loughrin. 2009. Development of a second-generation environmentally superior technology for treatment of swine manure in the USA. Bioresour. Technol. 100:5406-5416. Vanotti, M.B, A.A. Szogi, and L.M. Fetterman. 2010. Wastewater treatment system with simultaneous separation of phosphorus and manure solids. U.S. Patent 7,674,379 B2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=66-57-00-00