The evidence for switching stable patients to Inflectra

Similar documents
TOP PAPERS FROM 2016: IBD & BIOSIMILARS CYNTHIA SEOW MBBS(HONS), MSC, FRACP UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY CDDW, BANFF, AB MARCH 5, 2017

The Future Role of Biosimilars: An Unknown Frontier in IBD Treatment

NOR-SWITCH: Resultater og implikasjoner. Tore K. Kvien. Dept of Rheumatology Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo, Norway

Formulário de acesso a dados do Registo Nacional de Doentes Reumáticos (Reuma.pt) da SPR

Original Article. Abstract. 1. Introduction

A Physician s consideration towards Biosimilars. João Eurico Fonseca

Biosimilars: An Update on Clinical Trials (Review of Published and Ongoing Studies)

Professor Tore Kristian Kvien, MD, PhD, Norway

Naming, tracing, switching and other safety issues after 10 years learning

ECCO Position Statement on the Use of Biosimilars for Inflammatory Bowel Disease An Update

Interchangeability, Switching and Substitution of Biotherapeutics: Clinical Issues and Challenges

REFERENCE CODE GDHC218CFR PUBLICAT ION DATE FEBRUARY 2014 ULCERATIVE COLITIS - US DRUG FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Professor Kimme Hyrich, MD, PhD, FRCPC, UK

Biosimilars. Their regulatory status and their use

BIOLOGIC MEDICATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF IBD. crohnsandcolitis.ca

The Role of Infliximab Biosimilar CT-P13 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Ambrogio Orlando. L esperienza clinica con il biosimilare in Italia. IBD Unit U.O. Medicina Interna 2a A.O. Osp.Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello Palermo

REFERENCE CODE GDHC266CFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS JAPAN DRUG FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

ACG Public Forum. Join ACG, the FDA, and EMA for a discussion on biosimilars and IBD. Monday, 12:45 pm 2:15 pm

Drug Development in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The FDA Perspective

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Biologics in IBD: Optimizing Therapies and Emerging Agents

The Future of the U.S. Biosimilars Market: Development, Education, and Utilization. October 18, 2016

Professor Ahmed H Al-jedai, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, FCCP, FAST, Saudi Arabia

Emerging Medical Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Policy Position. Pharmacy-mediated interchangeability for Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs)

Biosimilars Scientific Challenges and Implications

Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals. Sandoz Biosimilars. From concept to reality

Epilogue: Demise of the biosimilar industry and Celltrion s path forward

Biosimilars are interchangeable with their reference products under the supervision of a health care person.

WILL BIOSIMILARS CHANGE THE TREATMENT PARADIGM IN PSORIASIS?

HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION REMICADE

Treatment: Nutrition and Medication

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Biosimilar regulation in Republic of Korea and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) developments

TNFα-Blocker-Monitoring (drug-level e.g. Remicade) ELISA Kit

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1106CFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1180DFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY POSITION STATEMENT

Current Trends and Future of Biosimilars

Survey 1 - Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients perception on originator biologics and biosimilars

The rheumatoid arthritis drug development model: a case study in Bayesian clinical trial simulation

Biosimilars in the EU

Supplement to Journal of The Association of Physicians of India Published on 1st of Every Month 1st May, 2017

Denosumab for the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with multiple myeloma first line

NOTICE OF SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Goldman Sachs Key Debates In Biosimilars Conference

Biologically derived monoclonal

Baek, Kyung-min. Recombinant Protein Products Division. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety

San Francisco Health Service System

Case 2:17-cv JCJ Document 1 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

BL-7040: Oligonucleotide for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Approval of a drug under this criteria document does not ensure full coverage of the drug.

Pipeline Drug Evidence Review: Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) vs. Tysabri, Lemtrada, Rebif and Tecfidera June 8, 2016

Anti- THrombosis with Enoxaparin in intubated Adolescents

Clinical considerations for biosimilar antibodies

Assays for Immunogenicity: Are We There Yet?

CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

What We Learned Running Investigator Initiated Trials

Simonetta Viviani, MD BIO-VIPE Consulting Limited, Hong Kong

Quantification of Neutralizing Antibodies to Biopharmaceuticals using a Novel Cell- Bassed Assay Platform Technology

Reassessing European Biotech Galapagos, Innate top picks

DARATUMUMAB, A CD38 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA Data from the dose-escalation part of the FIH study Abstract #8512

Clinical Immunogenicity and the Biosimilar paradigm

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Filed on behalf of: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Package leaflet: Information for the user. Remicade 100 mg powder for concentrate for solution for infusion Infliximab

Emerging biologics in inflammatory bowel disease

Biotest AG. Jefferies Healthcare Conference New York, June 7-10, 2016

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) & Clinical Trial Registries

Global Pharmaceuticals Survey Series (Part I): Rheumatoid Arthritis

Developing innovative new medicines for acute and chronic neurological and psychiatric conditions Larry Glass, CEO

Biogen Idec Synergy Creation in the move to the Big League. Activities, Assets and Sales Figures

Defining Clinical Benefit in Clinical Trials: FDA Perspective

Focus on biological and biosimilar drugs in Europe: pricing, reimbursement and access issues

National Foundation for Women Legislators Annual Meeting September 12, 2015 Tara Ryan Vice President, State Government Advocacy

The presenter declare no conflict of interest This work was partly supported by Selecta Bioscience

2016 Think Tank Barcelona

THE BIOLOGIC DRUG MARKET. ebook: The current state of biologic drugs and the challenges ahead

Genetics and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Annotated Template: Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial of an Investigational Product

Investigator Guide Reporting of Unanticipated Problems to the IRB

9th Open EIP Scientific Symposium. And. Final ABIRISK Open conference. Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals. Draft Program November 2017

@ALSETF #EAP2015. Jess B. Rabourn CBI Expanded Access Conference July 22, 2015

Continued Development of Approved Biological Drugs

uniqure Announces First Clinical Data From Second Dose Cohort of AMT-060 in Ongoing Phase I/II trial in Patients with Severe Hemophilia B

UBS 2016 Health Care Conference May 24, 2016

Guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and/or intramuscular administration (SCIg/IMIg)

Guideline on immunogenicity assessment of monoclonal antibodies intended for in vivo clinical use.

Introduction to Clinical Research

The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars 2017 update

Tysedmus, a Registry of Multiple Sclerosis patients exposed to Natalizumab

Strategies for Assessment of Immunotoxicology in Preclinical Drug Development

Review PROCESS, decision making PROCESS and communication BY

WHITE PAPER ON. Public Procurement of Biological Medicines

Vladimir Hanes, MD, USA

A Phase I/IIa Study of Human Anti-CD38 Antibody MOR03087 in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Transcription:

The evidence for switching stable patients to Inflectra Professor Silvio Danese Symposium co-chair Date of preparation: March 2017 PP-IFA-GLB-0551 Disclosures Silvio Danese has served as speaker, consultant and advisory board member for Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Hospira, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Takeda, Vifor, and Pfizer 1

EAHP 2017 Hospital Pharmacists: Catalysts For Change Biosimilars in IBD The Balance by Christian Schloe 2

Clinical studies that have examined switching to CT-P13* from Remicade Study (Country) PLANETRA extension 1 (International) PLANETAS extension 2 (International) Nikiphorou et al 3 (Finland) Completion or Publication Date Centres Total Patients (No. Switched) Indication/Use Duration July 2013 69 302 (144) Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) 48 weeks June 2013 40 174 (86) Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) 48 weeks November 2015 1 39 (39) RA, AS, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), juvenile inflammatory arthritis (JIA), chronic reactive arthritis 56 weeks Abdalla et al 4 (Ireland) June 2016 1 34 (34) RA, AS, PsA, IBD-related arthritis, JIA 91 weeks Holroyd et al 5 (UK) Malaiya et al 6 (UK) April 2016 1 56 (56) RA, PsA, enteropathic arthritis (EA) 21 weeks April 2016 1 31 (30) RA, AS, PsA 12 weeks a 1. Yoo DH et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:355 63. 2. Park W et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:346 54. 3. Nikiphorou E et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. a 2015;15(12):1677 83.4. Abdalla A et al. Open Access Rheumatol. 2017;9:29 35. 5. Holroyd C et al. Presented at: BSR 2016. Abstract O52. 6. MalaiyaConverted from months. R et al. Presented at: BSR 2016. Abstract 158. *The molecule CT-P13 is marketed in different countries by different companies, under different brand names including Remsima and Inflectra Clinical studies that have examined switching to CT-P13* from Remicade (cont d) Study (Country) DANBIO 1 (Denmark) Batticciotto et al 2 (Italy) Completion or Publication Date Centres Total Patients (No. Switched) Indication/Use Duration June 2016 Not stated 693 (693) RA, AS, PsA 12 weeks a June 2016 3 31 (31) PROSIT-BIO 3 January 2017 31 547 (97) AS, PsA, EA, undifferentiated spondylarthritis (SpA) Crohn s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) 26 weeks a 24 weeks NOR-SWITCH 4 (Norway) Planned completion January 2017 40 481 (240) RA, CD, UC, SpA, PsA, psoriasis 52 weeks Jung et al 5 (Korea) April 2015 6 110 (36) Inflammatory bowel disease 54 weeks 1. Glintborg B et al. Presented at: ACR 2016. Abstract 951. 2. Batticciotto A et al. Presented at: ACR 2016. Abstract 721. 3. Fiorino G et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(2):233 43. 4. Jørgensen K et al. Presented at: UEGW 2016. Abstract #LB15. 5. Jung et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:1705 12 a Converted from months. *The molecule CT-P13 is marketed in different countries by different companies, under different brand names including Remsima and Inflectra 3

PLANETRA and PLANETAS PLANETRA extension trial design PLANETRA (54 Weeks) 1 PLANETRA Extension (48 Weeks) 2 Patients with RA (n=606) Randomised CT-P13 3 mg/kg (n=302) Remicade 3 mg/kg (n=304) (n=233) (n=222) Screened (n=158) Screened (n=144) Maintained on CT- P13 (n=158) Switched from Remicade to CT- P13 (n=144) (n=133) (n=128) Eligible patients with RA from PLANETRA were enrolled in a 48-week extension study to assess the efficacy and safety of switching from Remicade to CT-P13 (switch group) relative to maintenance on CT-P13 (maintenance group) 2 The objective of the study was to confirm long-term efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and to investigate switching from Remicade to CT-P13 in patients with RA 2 1. Yoo DH et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):82. 2. Yoo DH et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:355 63. 4

Patients (%) Patients (%) 14-4-2017 Clinical response rates (ACR Criteria) at weeks 78 and 102 (efficacy population) ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses did not differ significantly between maintenance and switch groups at weeks 78 and 102 ACR20/ACR50/ACR70, American College of Rheumatology definition of a 20%/50%/70% improvement; CI, 95% confidence interval. Yoo DH et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:355 63. Antidrug Antibody (ADA) detection at weeks 78 and 102 (safety population) 100 80 ADA Positivity Maintenance (n=159) Switch (n=143) 100 80 ADA Persistency p = 1.0 80,2 80,4 Maintenance (n=159) Switch (n=143) 60 40 p = 0.82 p = 0.48 44,7 46,2 44,8 40,3 60 40 p = 1.0 20 20 19,8 19,6 0 Week 78 Week 102 0 Sustained ADAs Transient ADAs The percentage of patients positive for infliximab ADA and persistency of ADA was similar between treated groups at weeks 78 and 102 Yoo DH et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:355 63. 5

Patients (%) 14-4-2017 PLANETAS extension trial design PLANETAS (54 Weeks) 1 PLANETAS Extension (48 Weeks) 2 Patients with AS (n=250) Randomised CT-P13 5 mg/kg (n=125) Remicade 5 mg/kg (n=125) (n=106) (n=104) Screened (n=88) Screened (n=86) Maintained on CT- P13 (n=88) Switched from Remicade to CT- P13 (n=86) (n=81) (n=77) Eligible patients with AS from PLANETAS were enrolled in a 48-week extension study to assess the efficacy and safety of switching from Remicade to CT-P13 (switch group) relative to maintenance on CT-P13 (maintenance group) 2 The objective of the study was to confirm long-term efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and to investigate switching from Remicade to CT-P13 in patients with AS 2 1. Park W et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):25. 2. Park W et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:346 54. Clinical response rates (ASAS Criteria) at weeks 78 and 102 (efficacy population) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 OR: 0.66 CI: 0.33 to 1.32 p = 0.137 70,1 77,1 80,7 OR: 1.25 76,9 CI: 0.68 to 2.31 p = 0.080 57,5 51,8 OR: 1.08 CI: 0.51 to 2.31 p = 0.359 OR: 1.25 CI: 0.58 to 2.70 p = 0.506 OR: 1.09 CI: 0.57 to 2.07 p = 0.672 63,9 ASAS 20 ASAS 40 ASAS PR ASAS 20 ASAS 40 ASAS PR Week 78 Week 102 ASAS 20, ASAS 40, and ASAS PR responses were similar between the maintenance and switch groups at weeks 78 and 102 61,5 20,7 19,3 19,3 OR: 0.80 CI: 0.37 to 1.72 p = 0.275 23,1 Maintenance (n=88) Switch (n=86) ASAS 20/ASAS 40/ASAS PR, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20%/40% improvement criteria/partial remission; CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratio. Park W et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:346 54. 6

Patients (%) Patients (%) 14-4-2017 ADA positivity at weeks 78 and 102 (safety population) ADA Positivity ADA Persistency 100 Maintenance (n=90) Switch (n=84) 100 85,7 p = 1.00 88,9 Maintenance (n=90) Switch (n=84) 80 80 60 40 20 p = 0.39 p = 0.60 29,8 23,3 23,3 27,4 60 40 20 14,3 p = 1.00 11,1 0 n=90 Week 78 Week 102 0 Sustained ADAs Transient ADAs The percentage of patients positive for infliximab ADA and persistency of ADA was similar between treated groups at weeks 78 and 102 Park W et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:346 54. NOR-SWITCH 7

Study design and description 1-3 Primary endpoint Week 52 Screening Stable patients on INX (Remicade) for at least 6 months Randomisation 1:1 N = 481 INX (Remicade) CT-P13 Disease worsening W52 Disease worsening W52 Switch Follow-up W78 Follow-up W78 Primary endpoint: percentage of patients experiencing disease worsening Assumption: 30% worsening in 52 weeks Non-inferiority margin: 15% Open label follow-up 1. EudraCT Number: 2014-002056-40. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-002056-40/no Accessed: March 2017. 2. ClinicalTrials.gov. The NOR-SWITCH Study. NCT02148640. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct02148640. Accessed: March 2017. 3. Jørgensen K et al. Presented at: UEGW 2016. Abstract LB15 Primary endpoint: disease worsening across indications Disease worsening (all indications)* INX (N=202) CT-P13 (N=206) Adjusted rate difference (95% CI) 53 (26.2%) 61 (29.6%) -4.4 (-12.7 3.9) The authors concluded that switch from INX (Remicade) to CT-P13 was not inferior to continued treatment with INX (Remicade) *UC: Increase in partial-mayo (p-mayo) score of 3 points from randomisation and a minimum p-mayo score of 5 points CD: Increase in HBI of 4 points from randomisation and a HBI score of 7 points RA/PsA: Increase in DAS28 of 1.2 from randomisation and a minimum DAS score of 3.2 AS/SpA: Increase in ASDAS of 1.1 from randomisation and a minimum ASDAS of 2.1 Psoriasis: Increase in PASI of 3 points from randomisation and a minimum PASI score of 5 If a patient did not fulfill the formal definition, but experienced a clinically significant worsening according to both the investigator and patient and which led to a major change in treatment this was considered as a disease worsening but recorded separately in the Case Report Form. ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; CD, Crohn s Disease; CRF, DAS28, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints; HBI, Harvey-Bradshaw Index; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SpA, spondylarthritis; UC, ulcerative colitis. Jørgensen K et al. Presented at: UEGW 2016. Abstract #LB15 8

PROSIT-BIO Study design and description Key inclusion criteria Previously diagnosed either as UC or CD based on clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and histological criteria Naive to anti TNF-α (n=311) Previous exposure to anti TNF-α (n=139) Switched from originator infliximab (n=97) Primary endpoint: Evaluation of safety in terms of the rate of SAEs along the first year since introduction of CT-P13 Secondary endpoints: Efficacy evaluated in terms of clinical remission/response and treatment persistency Immunogenicity evaluated as the occurrence of infusion reactions and loss of response Predictive factors of safety and efficacy Week 8 Primary failure/ loss of response a CT-P13 Week 32 Estimated efficacy endpoint b Mean follow-up of 4.3 ±2.8 months Week 54 Primary endpoint c a Primary failure to CT-P13 was defined as no or minor clinical response at 8 weeks after the induction regimen or deterioration of clinical condition leading to surgery, early therapy change, or withdrawal. Loss of response was studied among responders at Week 8 using time-to-event methods for censored observations (ie, patients withdrawn from the study because of AEs, and patients who had not lost response on the final data collection date, were considered censored ). b Estimated efficacy was calculated using time-to-event methods for censored observations up to 32 weeks from the beginning of therapy. c Evaluation of safety in terms of rate of SAEs along the first year since the introduction of the CT-P13 biosimilar in Italy. CD=Crohn s disease; IBD=inflammatory bowel disease; SAE=serious adverse event; TNF=tumuor necrosis factor; UC=ulcerative colitis. FiorinoG et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(2):233 43. 9

Responders (% patients) 14-4-2017 Primary endpoint: adverse events for overall study population SAEs in the whole cohort Infusion reactions 6% Skin reactions Infections Others Arthralgia 26% Neurological Immunological 6% 3% 2% 2% 58% 12.1% of patients (66/547) reported SAEs, leading to discontinuation of CT-P13 in 16 patients (2.9%) No significant difference in the incidence of SAEs leading to discontinuation was found among the three cohorts 6.9% of patients (38/547) suffered infusion reactions, which led to discontinuation in 5.3% of patients Infusion reactions were observed more frequently in pre-exposed patients in the whole cohort (no difference between patients with UC and CD) CD, Crohn s disease; SAE, serious adverse event; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; UC, ulcerative colitis. FiorinoG et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(2):233 43. Secondary endpoint: probability of response and primary failure Probability of response (Kaplan-Meier Estimates) or primary failure by subgroup (n=434) a 100% 96,10% 95,70% 97,20% 94,50% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 8,10% 10% 11,10% 0% Overall (n=434) b Naïve (n=241) Previously exposed (n=99) Switch (n=94) Response Primary failure a Data presented are at the 8-week time point, which was calculated after the first 8 weeks, therefore 8 weeks actually represents 16 weeks from the start of treatment. b 18.6% (74/399) of the overall cohort s responders at Week 8 lost response during follow-up, which includes from week 8 onward. FiorinoG et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(2):233 43. 10

Conclusions Doubleblind RCT NOR-SWITCH 1 Open-label controlled trials PLANETRA 2 & PLANETAS 3 extension studies Prospective cohort studies PROSIT-BIO 4 Real-world case studies & single-centre studies DANBIO 5, Jung et al 6, Nikiphorou et al 7, Abdalla et al 8, Holroyd et al 9, Batticciotto et al 10, Malaiya et al 11 Available data indicates that switching to biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 shows similar safety and efficacy to remaining on innovator infliximab 1. Jørgensen K et al. Presented at: UEGW 2016. Abstract #LB15. 2. 1. Yoo DH et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:355 63. 3. Park W et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:346 54. 4. Fiorino G et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(2):233 43. 5. Glintborg B et al. Presented at: ACR 2016. Abstract 951. 6. Jung et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:1705 12 7. Nikiphorou E et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15(12):1677 83. 8. Abdalla A et al.open Access Rheumatol. 2017;9:29 35. 9. Holroyd C et al. Presented at: BSR 2016. Abstract O52. 10. Batticciotto A et al. Presented at: ACR 2016. Abstract 721. 11. Malaiya R et al. Presented at: BSR 2016. Abstract 158. ECCO position on biosimilars Danese S et al. J Crohn s Colitis. 2017:26 34 doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw198 Switching from the originator to a biosimilar in patients with IBD is acceptable. Studies of switching can provide valuable evidence for safety and efficacy. Scientific and clinical evidence is lacking regarding reverse switching, multiple switching, and cross-switching among biosimilars in IBD patients Switching from originator to a biosimilar should be performed following appropriate discussion between physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and patients, and according to national recommendation. 11

Biosimilars in IBD The Balance by Christian Schloe Biosimilars in IBD The Balance by Christian Schloe 12