David Miller, P.E.- Atlanta. The New Coal Ash Regulations Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Similar documents
A Guide to Navigating EPA s Final CCR Rule

Closure Plan Ash Disposal Area PGE Boardman Power Plant

Closure Plan Brame Fly Ash Pond

In-Situ Coal Combustion Products Impoundment Closure/Remediation Strategy

Groundwater Monitoring Requirements of the CCR Rule What s Next?

LANDFILL CLOSURE PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN

Additional criteria for approval of sanitary landfill facility permit to install applications.

NAUGHTON POWER PLANT NORTH ASH POND INITIAL CLOSURE PLAN

INITIAL INSPECTION REPORT ASH LANDFILL AREA SPRINGERVILLE GENERATING STATION SPRINGERVILLE, ARIZONA

Environmental Information Worksheet

Initial Closure Plan Slag Pond. Nelson Dewey Generating Station. Wisconsin Power and Light Company. Prepared for:

LANDFILL CLOSURE PLAN PLUM POINT ENERGY STATION CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N AFIN:

OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY L PE RMIT-TO4 N STALL t

Analysis of Recent Proposals to Amend the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to Create a Coal Combustion Residuals Permit Program

2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R3 AFIN:

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Coal Combustion Facility Assessment Report. October 20, 2010

Beneficial Use of Fly Ash for an Airport Safety Way Extension over a Multiple Year Project

2016 LANDFILL INSPECTION REPORT CARDINAL PLANT BRILLIANT, OHIO

Solid Waste Disposal Facility Closure Plan

2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN:

Green Station CCR Surface Impoundment Sebree Generating Station Address: 9000 Highway 2096 Robards, Kentucky 42452

Newmont Mining Corporation Tailing & Heap Leach Facility Management Standard

GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK

I. Site Name and Location

Disposal Technologies for Hazardous and Toxic Waste

Annual Inspection Report

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

TVA Colbert Fossil Facility Ash Disposal Pond 4

Design and Operation of Landfills

FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN HUNTLEY GENERATION STATION 3500 RIVER ROAD TONAWANDA, NEW YORK. PREPARED FOR: Huntley Power, LLC Tonawanda, New York

Watershed size and name: The drainage area is acres. The pond is located within the Ohio River watershed. (2016 Inflow Design Plan)

I. Site Name and Location

Trans- Ash Landfill Benton County, Tennessee Class II Disposal Facility

January 25, 2016 VIA (HARD COPY TO FOLLOW BY U.S. MAIL)

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

Closure and Post-Closure Care Plan NRG Indian River Generating Station Indian River Landfill Phase II

Advances in Design of Landfills Over CCR Ponds and Landfills

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands

Annual Inspection Report Lawrence Energy Center

Ch. 273 MUNICIPAL WASTE LANDFILLS CHAPTER 273. MUNICIPAL WASTE LANDFILLS

Alamogordo Desalination Project

The electronic PDF version of this paper is the official archival record for the CCGP journal.

TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID MINING WASTE

Effective June 17, 2013, the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) has been succeeded by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER).

Applying landforming to reclamation: A case study in Central Appalachia

Las Pulgas Landfill Phase I Clean Closure Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Ca

SMART GYPSUM STACK MANAGEMENT FROM CONCEPT TO REALITY

August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

POST CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (d) GERS Landfill. Pirkey Plant Hallsville, Texas. October, 2016

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

130A-294. Solid waste management program.

Application for Gas Exploration and Production

Written Post-Closure Plan. Pawnee Station - Active CCR Landfill Public Service Company of Colorado Denver Colorado

Table of Contents. Attachments Attachment A Photos Attachment B Inspection Map. Pages 3 of 10

An Approach to Siting Solid Waste Disposal Facilities in Minnesota

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation. Technical Project Planning (TPP) Meeting #4 07 November :00 AM 11:00 AM

Application For Waste Regulation (Check all that apply)

General Permit No.: OHR Page 53 of 146

Groundwater Statistical Analysis Plan

COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCTS (CCPs): OPPORTUNITIES FOR EXPANDED USE IN THE MINING INDUSTRY

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

Soil Treatment Facility Design and Operation for Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil. Version 1.0

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

(NOTE: Unless specifically identified, the changes outlined below apply to BOTH Chapter 78 and Chapter 78a.)

Coal Ash in Tennessee: Past, Present and Future

Coal Ash Landfill Management and Ash Pond Closure

Proposed EPA Regulations Changing the Coal Power Generation Industry

REROUTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Advanced Synthetic Grass Geomembrane Liner For Long-Term Environmental Closure

N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules - Design and Performance Standards. Nonstructural Strategies Assist with Strategy #2; See Page 3

SECTION 17.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION REGION 1 50 CIRCLE ROAD STONY BROOK, NY 11790

Continuous Simulation Modeling of Stormwater Ponds, Lakes, & Wetlands: A BUILT-IN APPLICATION OF PONDS 3.2

PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT

Environmental Protection Agency

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL SITE GUIDELINES

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

The Afton TSF, situated approximately 12 km west of Kamloops, BC has been under care and maintenance since 1997.

Table 11: Active C&D Debris Facilities in Florida (November 1998) DISTRICT C&D Disposal Land Clearing Debris Disposal

The surface water hydrology of the site has been logically divided into six phases of monitoring, analyses, and investigation as outlined below:

Before we get to the E&SC

APPENDIX M: Hazardous Waste Technical Report

Will be modified map from GIS 6/16 EOD

VOLUME 1 Overview of the Florida bioreactor demonstration project and the work plan

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Bureau of Mining and Minerals Regulation. Regulation of Mines. Howard J. Hayes, Program Administrator

Statistical Analysis Plan Sherco Unit 3 Landfill

Brackish Desalination: Zero Discharge. Thomas F. Seacord, P.E.

San Jacinto River Waste Pits Superfund Site

Paper Pulp Sludge Characteristics and Applications

Section SNOW DISPOSAL SITE DESIGN CRITERIA

Proposed EPA Regulations Changing the Coal Power Generation Industry

Stormwater as an Alternative Source of Water Supply: Feasibility and Implications for Watershed Management 1

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

Roche s Position 1 on Landfills / Contaminated Soil

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

(1) All sanitary landfill facilities, at a minimum, shall include the following:

Transcription:

David Miller, P.E.- Atlanta The New Coal Ash Regulations Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Overview of CCR Management & Regulations Subtitle D Requirements & Compliance Schedule Non-Utility Boilers Beneficial Reuse Preparation for Compliance

Most CCR impoundments & reservoirs were constructed decades ago when there was little regard for environmental consequences. Impoundment construction techniques vary from engineering design to an excavation extended until groundwater was encountered. Reservoirs are typically designed by an engineer in order to address the large volumes of water retained by the structure.

Most coal burning plants are located adjacent to surface water bodies. Accordingly, the majority of Ash Disposal Impoundments are situated in close proximity to surface water bodies for which there may be groundwater interconnection. Source: Google Earth Ash Disposal Reservoirs are often located a mile or more from the generation plant due the area required for construction.

The final rule was published in the Federal Register on April 17, 2015 and is effective on October 14, 2015 On December 19, 2014, the EPA issued the final Disposal of CCR s from Electric Utilities rule under which they are addressing CCR management under: - RCRA Subtitle D In response, the EPA issued their Proposed Rule for CCR s on May 4, 2010 under which the agency provided coproposals for CCR management under: - RCRA Subtitle D or RCRA Subtitle C On December 22, 2008, an 84-acre impoundment at the TVA s Kingston Fossil Plant ruptured releasing approximately 5.4 million CY s of Fly Ash into the Clinch River.

http://www2.epa.gov/coalash/coal-ash-rule

Landfills Siting (New Landfills) Minimum distance above groundwater- 2 feet; Not located within 200 ft of Holocene fault, not located in wetlands, flood plains or seismic impact zone, not located above a 100 GPM aquifer, 10,000 feet of airport, proximity to property lines, etc. New Landfill and Surface Impoundments Composite Liner - Two feet of clay recompacted to 1 x 10-7 cm/sec permeability, 30 mil flexible membrane liner (or 60 mil HDPE), leachate collection system. Surface Impoundments Closure Cap - Cover designed to minimize infiltration and erosion & have permeability < or = to bottom liner or no > 1 x 10-5 cm/s (May vary per State) 18-inch infiltration layer 6-inch erosion layer to support native plant growth Environmental Compliance Groundwater monitoring Post Closure Monitoring Groundwater monitoring, annual engineering inspection, maintenance

REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLETED TIMELINE* LOCATION RESTRICTIONS Uppermost Aquifer-Demonstration for placement above uppermost aquifer Demonstration for wetlands, fault areas, seismic impact areas and unstable areas. 42 mos. DESIGN CRITERIA Documentation of lined/unlined impoundment 18 mos. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY Install Permanent Marker Compile construction history Initial hazard potential classification assessment, initial structural stability assessment, initial safety factor assessment Emergency Action Plan development AIR Prepare Fugitive Dust control plan HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC CAPACITY Prepare initial inflow design flood control system 8 mos. 18 mos. 24 mos. 6 mos. 18 mos. * Effective October 14, 2015

REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLETED TIMELINE* INSPECTIONS Initiate weekly inspection of the CCR units Initiate CCR unit instrumentation monthly monitoring Complete initial annual inspection of CCR units GROUNDWATER MONITORING & CORRECTIVE ACTION Install groundwater monitoring system Develop sampling & analysis plan; implement detection/assessment monitoring Initiate corrective action for statistically significant increases over the groundwater protection standards 6 mos. 6 mos. 9 mos. 30 mos. CLOSURE/ POST-CLOSURE Prepare written Closure & Post-Closure plans 18 mos. RECORD KEEPING, NOTIFICATION & INTERNET REQUIREMENTS Perform required record-keeping Provide required notifications Establish CCR Website 6 mos. * Effective October 14, 2015

REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLETED TIMELINE* LOCATION RESTRICTIONS Complete demonstration for unstable area 42 mos. AIR Prepare Fugitive Dust control plan 6 mos. RUN-ON/ RUN-OFF CONTROLS Prepare initial Run-On/Run-Off control plan 18 mos. INSPECTIONS Initiate weekly inspection of the CCR units Complete initial annual inspection of CCR units GROUNDWATER MONITORING & CORRECTIVE ACTION Install groundwater monitoring system Develop sampling & analysis plan; implement detection monitoring Initiate corrective action for statistically significant increases over the groundwater protection standards 6 mos. 9 mos. 30 mos. * Effective October 14, 2015

REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLETED TIMELINE* CLOSURE/ POST-CLOSURE Prepare written Closure & Post-Closure plans 18 mos. RECORD KEEPING, NOTIFICATION & INTERNET REQUIREMENTS Perform required record-keeping Provide required notifications Establish CCR Website 6 mos. * Effective October 14, 2015

The EPA s CCR rule applies to electric utilities and independent power producers. The initial rule will not apply to non-utilities burning coal although the agency will consider potential actions after the CCR rule is promulgated.

The May 2000 determination that exempts beneficially reused CCRs from regulation as a hazardous waste under Section 3001(b)(3)(A) of RCRA will not be changed by the EPA. The EPA will continue to allow placement of CCRs in mine and non-minefill applications.

The thrust of the new regulations is to switch from slurry to dry handling of CCR waste. As such, impoundments are to be closed or retrofitted with a composite liner. Most impoundments are anticipated to be closed. With the anticipated closure of the impoundments the need for landfill disposal capacity will increase. Provided below is a summary of steps for compliance with the CCR regulations, the discussion of which forms the basis for the balance of this presentation: Assessment of Existing Disposal Facilities Landfills and Impoundments Landfills Lateral/vertical expansion or new facility Siting Criteria Impoundments & Reservoirs Website database Assessment of existing facilities Retrofit Closure Options Groundwater Monitoring Program Post-Closure Obligations

Future plant disposal needs Existing composite liner Feasibility of impoundment retrofit Landfill feasibility for new construction or expansion Geotechnical & environmental integrity of existing facility Siting criteria Cost analysis

Capacity to meet future disposal requirements Siting Criteria Engineering, geotechnical, environmental, geological/hydrogeological parameters such as: Wetlands, seismic areas, karst topography, abandoned mines, sole source aquifer, etc. Spatial aspects such as proximity to property lines, Holocene faults, airports, culturally significant sites, etc. Vertical Constraints Vertical expansion elevation Mitigation of non-compliant siting parameters Maximizing usage of existing infrastructure On-Site natural resources for use in construction Constructability

The CCR regulations require a website to be established for public access which provides all information related to the impoundment or reservoir closure; this includes: Engineering, Environmental, Geological Annual reports Inspection reports Agency correspondence As new data is developed it will be posted to the website database CITIZEN LAWSUITS

Review all available data Design drawings, inspection reports, agency files, environmental data, speak to long-time employees agency files, etc. Dike Conditions (Visual) erosion, seeps, stressed vegetation Geotechnical Field Investigation If engineering data gaps exist as to dike integrity, perform fieldwork necessary to make sound engineering decisions Geologic/Hydrogeologic Perform field investigation to support development of groundwater monitoring program

Feasibility: Is the impoundment imperative to plant make-up water? Is there an alternate, temporary disposal option to facilitate installation of a composite liner with leak detection? Adequate for future disposal needs? Existing facility geotechnical integrity sufficient for proposed future usage? Existing facility groundwater quality concerns; may this effect potential retrofit?

Closure cap of approximately 1 x 10-5 cm/sec permeability (may vary per state) Utilize existing dikes and onsite material for closure cap construction Closure Cap Closed Ash Impoundment Dikes

Partial berm removal for pond closure & landfill construction material LANDFILL Closed Ash Impoundment Leachate collection/ Composite Liner system

Reservoirs are subject to the same closure criteria as impoundments; however, they can be far more complex to close due to: Construction typically consists of earthen dam in mountainous terrain. Significant surface acreage - often exceeding 100 acres Complex cap closure design Minimal soil material to use in closure capping

What is Clean Closure? Removal of all waste material, minimizes need for future maintenance, residual constituent concentrations are below levels that may pose a risk to human health & the environment (52 FR 8704, March 19, 1987) Confirmation requires extensive testing of soil, bedrock (potentially) & groundwater to determine whether remaining material meets established geochemically acceptable standards for compliance Risk analysis/fate & transport modeling may be required Corrective measures for those chemical constituents not readily removed to acceptable concentrations

Compilation of available data Field investigation - subsurface investigation to develop: Cross-sections, aquifer properties, structural aspects, lineament delineation, groundwater flow direction, etc. Develop Groundwater Monitoring Program Monitor well locations Detection monitoring Statistical analysis plan Assessment monitoring Assessment of corrective measures Corrective action

Upgradient/Downgradient Monitoring Wells Ash/Clay/Soil dikes Upgradient Monitoring Well River Bank Original Ground Downgradient Monitoring Well Water level Ash River Potentiometric Surface Multi-port well for ash monitoring during dewatering Direction of Groundwater Flow

Relatively level topography near river River Groundwater flow during normal river pool level Perimeter Berm Water Surface Monitoring Well Multi-port well for ash monitoring during dewatering Note During river flood stages groundwater flow may reverse

Typically located in mountainous terrain Discharge from base of dam Discharge Structure Dam Structure Reservoir limits Groundwater and surface run-off enter reservoir Monitoring well Ash Reservoir Ash slurry line from plant Groundwater and surface run-off enter reservoir Multi-port well for ash monitoring during dewatering Note: - Higher topography surrounds reservoir - Lower elevation below dam structure

Groundwater monitoring, annual engineering inspection reviews, and site maintenance are to be accordance with 40 CFR Part 258 (Subtitle D of RCRA) for 30 years A reduced monitoring period may be considered if the owner/operator can demonstrate the site is no longer a potential concern to human health & the environment

David A. Miller, PE Principal NOVA Engineering and Environmental 3900 Kennesaw 75 Parkway Kennesaw, GA 30144 C 678-898-9223 www.usanova.com