T4 Floor Truss Example. AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial

Similar documents
AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Solid Shaft Pier Example

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 3D FEM Analysis Tutorial Steel Diaphragm and Lateral Bracing Specification Checking Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Tool Getting Started

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

Jerome J. Connor Susan Faraji. Fundamentals of Structural. Engineering. ^ Springer

FAQ. for Midas Gen Link, Preference and Drawings. Design + Solution for Structural Member Design with Drawing & Report

MWF Advanced Floor. User Guide. Last Updated on July 27 th 2015

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities

Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

Field Load Testing of the First Vehicular Timber Bridge in Korea

MIDAS Training Series

1. Stress Analysis of a Cantilever Steel Beam

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Nonlinear Redundancy Analysis of Truss Bridges

There are countless ways to improve constructability on your next project. Here are 50 of them. the need for it or specify it on the design drawings.

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

PENNDOT e-notification

Gusset Plate Retrofit in Illinois

FIELD TESTING AND LOAD RATING REPORT: THE MILO ADVENTIST ACADEMY S COVERED BRIDGE

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS METHOD

Effects of Changing Design Parameters on Girders

CONTENTS. Using Advanced CAD to Create 2D and 3D Objects in Chief Architect 1. Introduction..2

Designing for Longitudinal Force

Overview. Fracture Critical Inspection History Project Overview Research to Determine Criteria Case Studies Conclusions

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Composite Beam Design Manual AISC

Tech Tips SidePlate Connections FAQ 09/30/2017

STUDY ON TALL BUILDING STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

Redundancy analysis of an old steel railway bridge: A case study of Hardinge bridge

Rehabilitation Design and Construction for the US 190 Mississippi River Bridge Cleaning, Painting, and Repair Project

Compressive strength of double-bottom under alternate hold loading condition

HSS section calculations are based on the AISC Steel Construction Manual, 13 th edition (ASD only).

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

one structural behavior, systems and design Course Description Course Description Syllabus & Student Understandings statics mechanics of materials

STEEL DECKS FOR RAIL BRIDGES

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

Bjorhovde, R. Stub Girder Floor Systems Structural Engineering Handbook Ed. Chen Wai-Fah Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999

Compressive strength of double-bottom under alternate hold loading condition

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

TXDOT ENGINEERING SOFTWARE SUPPORT INFORMATION. Prestressed Concrete Girder SUPERstructure Design and Analysis Program (PGSuper TM )

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

RAILING DESIGN FOR NEW TRUSS BRIDGES. Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Chapter. Steel Member Design

October-December JCPS Volume 8 Issue 4

Rail-Structure Interaction using MIDAS. Sean McAuley, P.E. Scott Henning, P.E.

INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER

VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGY TO REPRESENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

Two-way slabs. Flat plate with or without drop panels / capitals

Design of Short Span Steel Bridges

INELASTIC OVERLOAD ANALYSIS OF STEEL MULTIGIRDER HIGHWAY BRIDGES. Heishman. Carl A~ Celal N. Kostem

High School STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING PROBLEM STATEMENT

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF BRACING SYSTEMS IN HORIZONTALLY CURVED STEEL I-

Chapter 3: Designing Steel Bridges Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E. July 2006

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NORMAL AND SKEW BRIDGE OF PSC BOX GIRDER

Beam Detailing V1.1 User Manual For SAP 2000 ETABS RISA 3D August 2015 Barcelona -Spain

Example. Monday, October 19, 2015

EXTREME. Makeover. Nu Skin Enterprises Utah campus gets a fresh new look.

KRONOS EMPLOYEE TRAINING GUIDE

Types Of Roofs - Vault

Product: ODTView. Subject: Basic Overview of Delivery and Orders Tab. Version: December 6, Distribution: Customer

DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL TRUSSED RAILWAY BRIDGES DUE TO THE PASSAGE OF HIGH SPEED TRAINS

BYER COVERED BRIDGE DESCRIPTION

Seismic Analysis & Design of 10 Story RC Building

V B D S. Visual Bridge Design System. S. Q. Wang, Ph.D., P.E. and Chung C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Distributed By

Live Load Distribution Factors Suitable For Concrete Bridges Under Ecp 201 And Euro Code 1991 Loading

Evaluation of Rehabilitation Alternatives for the Cedar Avenue Bridge

Hyperstatic (Secondary) Actions In Prestressing and Their Computation

ClubSelect Accounts Receivable Special Charges Overview

Behavior and Analysis of Horizontally Curved Composite Steel Girder Bridge System

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

Lab 4: Using the Workflow Engine

E APPENDIX. The following problems are intended for solution using finite element. Problems for Computer Solution E.1 CHAPTER 3

SECTION 401 PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE

Roebling Suspension Bridge. I: Finite-Element Model and Free Vibration Response

Scheduler Book Mode User Guide Version 4.81

Crack Evaluation and Repair of Cantilever Bracket Tie Plates of Edison Bridge

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE WITH TODAY S LATEST CALCULATION TOOLS OF MODERN AND EXISTING DESIGNS OF LARGE LPG TANKERS.

Microsoft Office Project 2010 Basic Course 01: Getting Started

Steel Connection Design

The purpose of this paper is to provide a fairly comprehensive

Simplified Analytical Model for a Queen-Post Covered Timber Bridge

VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Stair cases

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE ADAPT-PT/RC 2017 USER MANUAL. Copyright 2017

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Seismic Retrofit of the Aurora Avenue Bridge

An Employee s Guide to Kronos Workforce Timekeeper

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM ADAPT-PT. Version 2010 USER MANUAL. Copyright 2010

Mark L. Reno, P.E. September 11, 2015

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

Transcription:

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial T4 Floor Truss Example

BrR Training T4 Floor Truss Example Topics Covered Floor and truss system/line superstructure definitions overview Floor truss description Analysis rating results and outputs BrR/BrD supports modeling of three types of floor system/line superstructure definitions and two types of truss system/line superstructure definitions. Floor system/line superstructure definition supported configurations: Girder-Floorbeam-Stringer Girder-Floorbeam Floorbeam-Stringer Truss system/line superstructure definition supported configurations: Truss-Floorbeam-Stringer Truss-Floorbeam Modeling capabilities in system superstructure definition: Number of main members (girders or trusses) can be more than two. Continuous span main member are supported. Main members can directly support the deck. This enables entry of composite deck properties for the main members. Main member configuration type can be deck or through. Stringers can frame into the floor beam or rest on top of the floor beam. Support entry of deterioration profile information. Modeling limitations in system superstructure definition: Main member spacings cannot vary along the length of the superstructure. Number of stringers and stringer spacings cannot vary in the superstructure. Deck width cannot vary along the length of the superstructure. Floor beams at support lines are assumed to have the same skew as the support line. All other floor beams are assumed to be perpendicular. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 1

Cantilevered floor beam spans are only supported for deck main member configuration type. Interior floor beams can only be supported by the main members. Floor truss is supported in system superstructure definition and implemented as a new type in floorbeam definition. The truss members in floor truss can have rolled and built-up cross sections. BrR Truss LFD Engine is the analysis module for rating floor truss. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 2

In this example, we will create a new floor truss definition in BID 13 and replace the floor beam definition assigned to Floorbeam1's Alt #1 floorbeam member alternative with the new floor truss definition. From the Bridge Explorer, double-click BID 13 FSys GFS TrainingBridge1 to open the bridge workspace. Expand the workspace tree until the FLOORBEAM DEFINITIONS and Floorbeam1 s FLOORBEAM MEMBER ALTERNATIVES are visible. The Bridge Workspace of BID 13 FSys GFS TrainingBridge1 is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 3

Double-click FLOORBEAM DEFINITIONS in the tree to create a new floorbeam definition. The New Floorbeam Definition dialog shown below will open. Select Steel for the Material Type and Detail Steel Truss for the Girder Type. Click OK to close the dialog and create a new floorbeam definition. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 4

The Floorbeam Definition window will open. Enter the data as shown below. Cross-section based property input method is the only input method for floor truss. The 0.005 kip/ft Additional self load will be applied for each truss member in the floor truss. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 5

Select the Geometry tab and enter the locations of the panel points as shown below. These panel points will be used to define the truss members. Click OK to save the data to memory and close the Floorbeam Definition window. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 6

In the Floorbeam Definition window Geometry tab, the Symmetrical option specifies that the entered panel point locations are symmetrical. The Number of Panels will be enabled when Symmetrical is selected. For even number of panels, enter the panel point locations from the left most panel to the central panel points. For odd number of panels, enter the panel point locations from the left most panel to the right end of the central panel. If Symmetrical is selected, symmetrical geometry, supports and user-defined truss member loads will be generated. Symmetry - Even U1 Axis of Symmetry U2 L1 L2 Symmetry - Odd U1 U2 L1 L2 User Input Generated Last Modified: 7/18/2016 7

The workspace tree with the new Floortruss Def 1 is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 8

We will come back to complete Floortruss Def1 after checking the geometry data we just entered. Double-click Floorbeam1 s Alt #1 floorbeam member alternative in the tree and change the assigned floorbeam definition to Floortruss Def 1. Click OK to save the data to memory and close the window. The Floorbeam Member Alternative window will be populated with truss members after Floortruss Def1 is completely defined. The General tab allows you to override the computed capacities, the allowable stresses and the unbraced length defined in Floortruss Def 1. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 9

Next right-click Floorbeam1 s Alt #1 in the tree and select Schematic. The truss schematic is displayed below. Check the geometry and adjust the panel point locations if necessary. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 10

We will now go back to complete Floortruss Def 1 description. Double-click Truss Member Cross Sections in the tree to create a new rolled section. The New Cross Section dialog shown below will open. Select Rolled Section, click OK to close the dialog and create a new rolled section. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 11

Enter the data as shown below for the Rolled Section. Click OK to save the data to memory and close the window. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 12

Double-click Truss Member Cross Sections in the tree to create a new built-up section. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 13

Enter the data as shown below for the Builtup Section. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 14

Select the Top Cover Plates tab to enter the top cover plate as shown below. Click Copy to Bottom Cover Plates to copy the cover plate to the Bottom Cover Plates tab. Click OK to save the data to memory and close the window. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 15

The partial workspace tree with the new Rolled Section and Builtup Section is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 16

The configurations of the supported rolled and built-up cross sections are shown below. Supported Rolled Sections: Rolled Section Rolled Section w/ Top Plate Rolled Section w/ Bot. Plate Rolled Section w/ Top & Bot. Plates Supported Builtup Sections: Full I Section I Section w/o Top Plate I Section w/o Bot. Plate I Section w/o Top & Bot. Plates I Section w/o Angles I Section w/o Web Plate but w/ Lacing Double-click Truss Member Properties in the tree to open the Truss Member Properties window. Click New to create a new row and select Panel Point From and Panel Point To to populate the Member Name and the Z Axis and Y Axis Unbraced Lengths. Enter the data as shown below for the truss members. Click OK to save the data to memory and close the window. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 17

Last Modified: 7/18/2016 18

Right-click Floorbeam1 s Alt #1 in the tree and select Schematic. The truss schematic is displayed below. Check the geometry and adjust the truss members if necessary. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 19

Double-click Floorbeam1 s Alt #1 floorbeam member alternative in the tree. The Loss tabs allow you to describe the deteriorations of the rolled and built-up cross sections. The deterioration is defined for a truss member and described over ranges, with each range being defined by a start distance and a length. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 20

Click View Analysis Settings in the Bridge Workspace toolbar to open the Analysis Settings window. Select HS 20-44 as the vehicle to be used in the rating. Click OK to save the analysis settings to memory. View Analysis Settings Last Modified: 7/18/2016 21

Select Floorbeam1 s Alt #1 floorbeam member alternative in the Bridge Workspace tree. Click Analyze in the Bridge Workspace toolbar to start the analysis. Analyze The Analysis Progress window will open. Messages in blue color are information messages. Warning messages are in green color and error messages are in red color. The Analysis Progress window indicates the analysis is successfully completed. Click OK to close the Analysis Progress window. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 22

Click View analysis report in the Bridge Workspace toolbar to open the Analysis Results window. View analysis report The Rating Results Summary of Floorbeam1 s Alt #1 floorbeam member alternative is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 23

Click View analysis output in the Bridge Workspace toolbar to open the Analysis Output window. Double-click the name of an output file to open the file in its own viewer. View analysis output Description of the output files: FE Model for Stage 1 The stage 1 finite element model presents the floor truss nodes, truss elements, element properties, support conditions and load cases for the dead load analysis. FE Actions for Stage 1 FE Model The stage 1 finite element result presents the support reactions, element actions and nodal displacements for each dead load case. FE Model for Stage 3 Influence Lines Last Modified: 7/18/2016 24

The stage 3 influence line finite element model presents the floor truss nodes, truss elements, element properties, support conditions and load cases for the influence line analysis. Each load case represents a unit load at a panel point. FE Actions for Stage 3 Influence Lines FE Model The stage 3 influence line finite element result presents the support reactions, element actions and nodal displacements for each influence line load case. The results are used to generate the axial influence lines for the truss elements and the reaction influence lines for the support nodes. FE Model for Virtual Stringer Stage 3 Influence Lines The stage 3 virtual stringer influence line finite element model presents the virtual stringer nodes, beam elements, element properties, support conditions and load cases for the virtual stringer influence line analysis. FE Actions for Virtual Stringer Stage 3 Influence Lines FE Model The stage 3 virtual stringer influence line finite element result presents the support reactions for each influence line load case. The results are used to generate the reaction influence line for the support node located at the floor truss. Virtual Stringer LL Summary File The virtual stringer live load summary presents the reaction influence line for the support node located at the floor truss and the maximum and minimum vertical reactions for each live loading. Floorbeam Transverse LL Summary File The floorbeam transverse live load summary presents the stringer reactions for each vehicle position pattern and the resulting axial force for each truss member. Member Section Property Report The section properties report presents the section properties for each truss member and for each component of a truss member. Rating Results Report The rating result report presents all information required to perform the rating computation. Panel Point Maximum Forces Report The maximum forces report presents the maximum member forces due to dead load and live load for each truss member at each panel point. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 25

Panel Point Concurrent Forces Report The concurrent forces report presents the concurrent member live load forces for each panel point s member under the critical live load condition. Log File The log file is the analysis log produced when the analysis is run. This file may contain errors and warnings that should be reviewed. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 26

A portion of the Member Section Property Report is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 27

A portion of the Rating Results Report is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 28

A portion of the Panel Point Maximum Forces Report is shown below. Last Modified: 7/18/2016 29