Carbon Sequestration in California s Rangeland Soils

Similar documents
THE INTRODUCTION THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

BUILDING CLIMATE RESILIENCE INTO OUR AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM. Jeremy Emmi, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Compost Land Management and Soil Carbon Sequestration

Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils a global perspective

Challenges in assessing mitigation and adaptation options for livestock production: Europe, Africa & Latin America

Agriculture, Diet and the Environment. by David Tilman University of Minnesota, and University of California Santa Barbara

Greenhouse gases and agricultural: an introduction to the processes and tools to quantify them Richard T. Conant

Soil Carbon Sequestration in California Agriculture Kate Scow, Director Kearney Foundation, Dept LAWR, UC Davis

New Specialty Crops for California

AB 32 and Agriculture

Impact of Grain Farming on Climate Change

Climate Change and Agriculture: How is USDA Helping Agriculture Respond

Soil carbon sequestration and croplands

Grazing Land Management and Water Quality

USDA GLOBAL CHANGE FACT SHEET

The Florida Ranchlands Environmental Services Project (FRESP)

THE BIOLOGY OF SOIL HEALTH A PRIMER FOR FARMERS

Fertility management in organic strawberries

BAAQMD s Greenhouse Gas Measurement Program

Grazing Management for Healthy Soils

Chapter 3 GHG Emissions Inventory

Modelling sustainable grazing land management Relevant research in Agriculture and Global Change Programme

HEALTHY SOILS INITIATIVE AND INCENTIVES PROGRAM

GLOBAL WARMING. Dr. Chris P. Tsokos. Distinguished University Professor Vice President of IFNA. July 03, 2008

Using triticale and annual ryegrass in cool season perennial grass grazing systems. Daniel J. Drake and Steve B. Orloff 1 ABSTRACT

Farmland and climate change: factors and lessons from farmed landscapes. ELO Biodiversity Conference Brussels 9 December 2015

Peatland Carbon Stocks and Fluxes:

Abstract. Acknowledgments

SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION WITH CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN USA: POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS

Implications of the IPCC AR5 Report for the UNFCCC Negotiations and Mitigation Options in AFOLU (Agriculture Forest and Other Land Use)

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

New Cost Estimates for Forest Carbon Sequestration in the United States

Agriculture and Carbon Offsets Policy

Information on LULUCF actions by Sweden. First progress report

Climate Action Planning at Rice University. Richard R. Johnson Admin. Center for Sustainability and Energy Management 27 April 2016

Applying Dairy Lagoon Water to Alfalfa

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

Creating and Sustaining Soil Health

CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE and HEALTHY SOILS

American Carbon Registry

2014 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR

CALIFORNIA EDUCATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE

The Grass Is Always Greener: Forage Varieties and Selection. Dr. Ann Blount, Forage Breeding and Genetics NFREC-Marianna and Quincy

An investment model for large-scale green

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Status on Land Use Change and Forestry Sector in Myanmar

WARM SEASON GRASSES. Mark Green District Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service

Ammonia costs spike sharply higher Nitrogen prices disrupt calm in fertilizer market By Bryce Knorr, grain market analyst

Grassland Ecosystem Function: Uplands

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

Soil, biodiversity and ecosystem services. Louise Jackson Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis USA

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

Nutrient Management for Vegetable Production

Chapter 2: Best Management Practices: Managing Cropping Systems for Soil Protection and Bioenergy Production

Ecology & Management of Ventenata in the Inland Northwest

Carbon Credits - Marketing a New Crop from Your Farm or Ranch. Dale Enerson, Director NFU Carbon Credit Program August 14, 2007

OUTLOOK FOR US AGRICULTURE

Biochar Field Trial in San Mateo County, California: Presented to AQWA August 29 th 2016 by Brittani Bohlke & Sara Polgar

Conversion to Native Grasslands Offset Project Protocol Framework

Organics Collection Program and Yard Material Pile Collection Update

Biochar: A Potential Soil Organic Amendment in Tea

Improving Soil Health with Grazing

Powering Michigan Agriculture with Renewable Energy

San Diego County Greenhouse Gas Inventory. An Analysis of Regional Emissions and Strategies to Achieve AB 32 Targets. Other Fuels Report

Soils and Climate Change

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

INFORMATION GUIDE ON REGENERATIVE PRACTICES

Mineralization of Nitrogen from Compost

Net Ecosystem Carbon Exchange of Mangroves: Complexities in Developing Global Budgets

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

DYNAMIC HAY EXPORT GROWTH LED BY CHINA. Dan Putnam, William A. Matthews, and Daniel A. Sumner 1 ABSTRACT

Ranch Water Quality Plan Template for. Napa River & Sonoma Creek Watersheds

III Low Carbon Scenario for LULUCF. Brazil GHG Emissions Profile

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

European forest sector carbon

Water balance of savannah woodlands: a modelling study of the Sudanese gum belt region

What are agriculture s best strategies for coping with climate change?

Professor and Director. University of Dar Es Salaam,

The Science of Integrated Crop Livestock Systems

Organic Systems Trial. Advisory Group Meeting 2008

Methane and California s Livestock Operations. Rachel Tornek, Policy Director California Methane Symposium, Los Angeles March 12, 2015

IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON WATER AVAILABILITY AND EXTREME FLOWS IN ADDIS ABABA

Guidelines and tools to get the most from grazing in Ireland

What Works: Farming Practices

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

Cattle & Beef Outlook

Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE

The Big Picture: Relationship between Forests and Climate Change

OPERATING INPUTS Units Price Quantity $/Acre Wheat Seed Bu./acre $ $ Custom Harvest Acre $ -

The SEEA EEA carbon account for the Netherlands

Carbon Flow from Roots to Microbes to Soil Humic Substances

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Gold Standard Afforestation/Reforestation (A/R) GHG Emissions Reduction & Sequestration Methodology

Earth Science Standard E.7.b. Student Workbook Education and the Environment Initiative. The Life and Times of Carbon

Increasing Crop Productivity and Water-Use Efficiency by Utilizing Ethanol CO 2 Emissions

Dairy Outlook. January By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

Soils and Global Warming. Temperature and Atmosphere. Soils and Water, Spring Lecture 9, Soils and Global Warming 1

Mapping global soil Carbon stocks and sequestration potential

Reducing Livestock s Winter-Feed Costs. Mark Landefeld Extension Educator, Agriculture & Natural Resources, Monroe County

Transcription:

Carbon Sequestration in California s Rangeland Soils Nicasio Native Grass Ranch Whendee L. Silver Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley CAL-CAN March 31 2011

Plants and soil microbes have a significant effect on global atmospheric CO 2 concentrations Atmospheric CO 2 ( ppmv ) 390 380 370 360 350 340 330 320 310 Year

Projected Atmospheric CO 2 (ppmv) 450 440 430 420 410 400 390 380 370 360 350 Reducing emissions alone will not mitigate climate change Hypothetical emissions reduction scenario Year

Carbon comes into ecosystems via Photosynthesis CO 2 CO 2 via photosynthesis+nutrients+water = Plants

Carbon leaves ecosystems via Respiration from soil microbes CO 2

CO2 Photosynthesis CO2 Respiration DOC

Carbon Inputs > Carbon Outputs = Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration Soil Carbon

Grasses allocate a high propor/on of their photosynthate belowground to roots greater soil carbon pools

Grasslands cover a significant por/on of the Earth s land surface *30% of global land surface *Over half of the global land use *33% of the US land area *56% of California land area

Conant et al. (2001) showed that management can increase soil C stocks

Soil carbon pools tend to increase with improved grazing practices Change in Soil C Stock (Mg C ha -1 y -1 ) 2 1 0-1 30 40 50 60 Latitude ( o N) 35 case studies Redrawn from Conant et al. 2001

California Grasslands and Carbon Sequestra/on 23 million hectares of rangeland statewide Assume 50% available for C sequestra/on Units: MT = Metric ton MMT= Million metric tons CO 2 e = CO 2 equivalents MT=Mg=Metric ton

California Grasslands and Carbon Sequestra/on 23 million hectares of rangeland statewide Assume 50% available for C sequestra/on At a rate of 0.5 MT C ha - 1 y - 1 = 21 MMT CO 2 e/y At a rate of 1 MT C ha - 1 y - 1 = 42 MMT CO 2 e/y Units: MT = Metric ton MMT= Million metric tons CO 2 e = CO 2 equivalents MT=Mg=Metric ton

California Grasslands and Carbon Sequestra/on 23 million hectares of rangeland statewide Assume 50% available for C sequestra/on At a rate of 0.5 MT C ha - 1 y - 1 = 21 MMT CO 2 e/y At a rate of 1 MT C ha - 1 y - 1 = 42 MMT CO 2 e/y Livestock ~ 15 MMT CO 2 e/y Commercial/residen/al ~ 42 MMT CO 2 e/y Units: MT = Metric ton MMT= Million metric tons CO 2 e = CO 2 equivalents MT=Mg=Metric ton Electrical genera/on ~112 MMT CO 2 e/ y Emissions data: CA GHG Inventory ARB 2010

Managing grasslands for increased carbon content has many co-benefits Carbon sequestration in pastures and rangelands increases: Fertility Water holding capacity Soil stability Sustainability Productivity

Marin Carbon Project (UC Berkeley and Davis, Stakeholders, Resource Conservation District, UC Extension, Marin Agricultural Land Trust, Marin Organic, County Agricultural Commissioner, USDA-NRCS) 1. Do soil carbon stocks vary in California s rangelands? 2. Can we detect an effect of management on soil carbon stocks?

Large range in soil carbon pool size Considerable soil C storage capacity Soil Carbon to 50 cm depth (Mg C ha - 1 ) 150 100 50 0 Profile From Silver et al. 2010

We can detect changes in rangeland soil carbon pools with management Soils Carbon (Mg/ha) to 1 m depth 400 300 200 100 0 Soils sampled from 35 grazed rangeland sites in Marin and Sonoma Counties Fields (ranked) From Silver et al. In prep

Organic amendments increased soil carbon by 50 Mg C ha -1 in the top meter of soil Soil Carbon (Mg/ha) to 1 m depth 300 200 100 0 Extensive Intensive From Silver et al. In prep

Redirecting the waste stream and reducing greenhouse gas emissions Jepson Prairie Organics Livermore Landfill

Organic ma[er amendments (compost) to grazed rangelands (Nicasio and Browns Valley) Followed CO 2, N 2 O, and CH 4 fluxes and aboveground net primary produc/on

Compost increased soil moisture. Soil Volumetric Water Content (%) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 compost control 0 Jun 09 Aug 09 Oct 09 Dec 09 Feb 10 Apr 10 Jun 10 Sep 10 Nov 10 Browns Valley, Ryals and Silver in prep

...and soil respiration Soil respiration (g C/m 2 /d) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Pretreatment Compost Control 0 Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug 2008 2009 2010 Browns Valley, Ryals and Silver in prep

Compost increased plant and forage production by 50% Aboveground Production (Mg C ha -1 y -1 ) 4 3 2 1 0 Compost Control 2009 2010 Ryals and Silver in prep

We detected an increase in soil C pools after one year 1450 Valley Grassland Coastal Grassland 1250 Soil organic carbon (g/m 2 ) compost - control 1050 850 650 450 250 50-150

Composting added 12-15 Mg C ha -1 No significant increase in N 2 O or CH 4 emissions Ryals and Silver in prep

Carbon sequestration in California rangelands Next steps: 1. Test promising management approaches and mechanisms of C sequestration and long-term storage 2. Calibrate models to account for key drivers of change 3. Identify the relationships between climate (change) and management

Marin Carbon Project Nicasio Native Grass Ranch Support provided by: The Marin Community Foundation The Rathmann Family Foundation The Lia Foundation The Kearney Foundation for Soil Science USDA

Soil carbon increased detectably in the composted plots Wick Ranch 60 50 Compost Compost + Plow Control Plow 60 50 SFREC Soil Carbon (Mg ha -1 ) 40 30 20 Soil Carbon (Mg ha -1 ) 40 30 20 10 10 0 Dec 2008 Sep 2009 0

Subsoiling appears to lead to losses of soil C over year 1 4 Wick Ranch Carbon Concentration (%) 3 2 1 0 WR5 WR6 WR7 Block Compost Compost Plow Control Plow

Compost significantly increased plant and forage production Aboveground biomass (Mt C ha -2 ) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 Control Compost Control 2009 2010 Compost Browns Valley, Ryals and Silver in prep

Organic amendments increase carbon gain by over 10 Mg C/ha in year 1 1500 Net Change (g C m -2 t -1 ) 1000 500 0 Assumptions: Heterotrophic respiration = 50% of total Root biomass = shoot biomass No difference in grazed biomass -500 Compost Control Nicasio, Ryals and Silver in prep

In Progress 1. Life Cycle Analysis: what is the full greenhouse gas accoun/ng of these management ac/vi/es? 2. Grazing Management: can grazing management alone increase soil carbon storage? 3. Plant Community: What happens to it and can we encourage na/ve perennial grasses through carbon farming?

Composting emitted approximate 12.6 Mg CO 2 eq over 16 weeks (~ 4.2 Dairy cow s worth over 1 yr ) Corn-heavy compost Manure-heavy compost Manure

Our new field sites incorporate some of the variability in the region

Questions