Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy

Similar documents
Local Water Quality and Watersheds. Raccoon River & Des Moines River Watersheds. Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Implications and Strategies for Iowa

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

available detached transport availability detached carries

HYPOXIA IN THE GULF OF MEXICO: IMPLICATIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR IOWA

A result of the University of Missouri s Outreach and Extension (UOE) Plan of Work Statewide

Government Conservation Programs

Ohio s Great Miami River Watershed

Illinois EPA update to DuPage County Watershed Management Section Bureau of Water

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

Agricultural Environmental Management

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

6.1 Recommended Overarching Actions to Support Nutrient Reduction Strategy Implementation

Elin Betanzo July 14, 2015

For the full report Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy go to

Groundwater Protection Rule Framework March 2018

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS SECTION

THE IMPORTANCE OF AGRIBUSINESS TO THE BI-STATE ECONOMY. Prepared by the St. Louis Agribusiness Club January 2010

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Upper Mississippi River Conference 2016 Action Agenda: Raise the Grade

Pennsylvania s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan

Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

Appendix H: Tracking Tool Recommendations

Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force Timeline for Reassessment Revised 9/5/06. Revised 9/5/06. Symposia.

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

IMPROVING WATER QUALITY: A REVIEW OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN HEALTHY WATERSHEDS INITIATIVE (MRBI) TO TARGET U.S. FARM CONSERVATION FUNDS

Drivers of Nutrient Load Reductions

Washington State Conference A Perspective on Water Quality Issues across Washington State Strategies and Implementation for Reducing

Nitrate-N Loss Reduction: Scale of In- Field and Edge-of-Field Practice Implementation to Reach Water Quality Goals

New York State Animal Agriculture Program Assessment

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

Memorandum of Understanding for an Adaptive Management Pilot Project in the Yahara Watershed

To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?

Climate Change and Agriculture: How is USDA Helping Agriculture Respond

Annual Report 2016 July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016

THE FUTURE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN

Jointly developed by C-AGG and Chesapeake Bay Foundation December 2015

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, 2008

Using Paired Edge of Field Data to Assess Impacts of Management on Surface and Subsurface P Loss

Importance of Phosphorus in Plant and Human Nutrition

NRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality

Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward

Growing Greener Grants. Agricultural Advisory Board December 22, 2016

Spring Nutrient Flux to the Gulf of Mexico and Nutrient Balance in the Mississippi River Basin

Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules

Stormwater Quality Trades: Virginia Farms and Highways

Land Application and Nutrient Management

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward. By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University

Pennsylvania s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan: What are the Expectations?

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

FDACS BMP PROGRAM OVERVIEW. UF/IFAS and FDACS/Office of Agricultural Water Policy

Topics Background Findings Recommendations

Agriculture and the Environment

From the Fields to the Great Lakes

Good morning Chairman Hite, Vice Chairman Balderson, Ranking Member Gentile and members of the

Urban Ag Academy. A Look Into Iowa s Pork Industry. Gregg Hora Iowa Pork Producer IPPA President Elect

Report on Nitrate in Groundwater

Agriculture and the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Issue

Nitrate Load Reduction Strategies for the Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers. Keith Schilling, Calvin Wolter Iowa DNR Geological and Water Survey

Manure Management Manual Revisions

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

Maryland s Regulatory Approach to Nutrient Management

Kapil Arora, Carl Pederson, Dr. Matt Helmers, and Dr. Ramesh Kanwar. DATE SUBMITTED: October 23, INDUSTRY SUMMARY

Using Weather Forecasting For Decision Tools For Animal Agriculture

Basin Management Action Plan Suwannee River

Precision Ag. Back to Basics

PROCEEDINGS 2017 Crop Pest Management Short Course & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show

August 4, The Honorable Donald J. Trump President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC Dear Mr. President:

The Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1

Maryland Nutrient Management Program

Georgia's Nonpoint Source Management Program. Linda MacGregor Watershed Protection Branch Georgia Environmental Protection Division

C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e

Effects of outreach on the awareness and adoption of conservation practices by farmers in two agricultural watersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois

Alabama Department of Agriculture & Industries. Commissioner John McMillan

Improving Nutrient Management for Animal Production Systems. Dr. Tom Sims College of Agriculture & Natural Resources University of Delaware

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, From: G. Albrecht P. Ristow

BMP Verification: What is it and How Will it Impact Pennsylvania?

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

Walnut Creek Watershed Management Authority. Project Kick Off March 18, 2015

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study

An Environmental Accounting System to Track Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Pollution in the Lake Champlain Basin. Year 2 Project Work Plan

Nutrients and Ecosystems

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

The Next Generation of Stormwater Management and Site Design. Melanie R. Grigsby, P.E. Stormwater Resource Manager, City of Fort Myers

Cover Crop Champions 2013

from agriculture PhD Candidate, Agricultural Economics, Purdue University 2 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics, Purdue University

Nutrient Management for Vegetable Production

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

Water Plans. Water Plans: Houston County LWMP amended 2012 Winona County LWMP

James A. Klang, PE. Senior Project Engineer Kieser & Associates, LLC 536 E. Michigan Ave., Ste. 300 Kalamazoo, MI 49007

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions

Transcription:

Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren Lurkins Director of Natural and Environmental Resources

Why is the Strategy Needed? Gulf Hypoxia Task Force 5 federal agencies, 12 states and tribes in the Mississippi River Basin Established in 1997 to reduce/control hypoxia in the Gulf 2008 Action Plan Goals: Reduce Hypoxic Zone to 1,930 square miles Reduce Nutrient Loading to the Gulf 45% Total P and Total N

Why is the Strategy Needed? USEPA Guidance Memo in March 2011 Purpose: Encourage states to develop nutrient reduction strategies while continuing to develop numeric nutrient standards. Lays out 8 elements of a framework

Stakeholder Involvement Stakeholders met August 2013 May 2014: Illinois Department of Agriculture, Illinois EPA University of Illinois Science Team Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Pork Producers Association, Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association, Illinois Corn Growers Association, Illinois CBMP Association of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts University of Illinois Extension NRCS Sanitary Districts/Wastewater Treatment Plants Prairie Rivers Network, Environmental Law and Policy Center, Sierra Club Illinois Environmental Regulatory Group

Status of the Strategy Illinois EPA plans to release draft for public comment at the end of August Final strategy will go to USEPA by end of 2014

Science Assessment February 2013 Illinois EPA partnered with University of Illinois to develop the Science Assessment: Current conditions in Illinois of nutrient sources and export by rivers in the state from point and nonpoint sources Methods that could be used to reduce these losses and estimates of their effectiveness throughout Illinois Estimates of the costs of statewide and watershed level application of these methods to reduce nutrient losses to meet TMDL and Gulf of Mexico goals

Science Assessment Illinois contributes 20% of nitrate (410 M lbs) and 11% of phosphorus (37.5 M lbs) that makes it to the Gulf

Strategy Targets and Costs Baseline Average annual loading of nitrate-n and P from the 1980-1996 levels Targets (5 year running average) N: 15% by 2025, 45% ultimate P: 25% by 2025, 45% ultimate Estimated costs - $800 million annually from point source and nonpoint source, with no new funding sources

Agricultural Nonpoint Sources Includes recommended BMPs shown through peer reviewed research to reduce nutrient losses In-field (split application of N, cover crops, reduced tillage) Edge of field (bioreactors, wetlands) Land use changes (perennial crops) Information on costs and estimated reductions/acre for N and P Combination scenarios of BMPs to see large scale reductions

Agricultural Nonpoint Sources Livestock operations - BMPs included for: Land application of manure Runoff management from production areas

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources Focus on building upon existing programs and resources Reinvigoration of voluntary conservation adoption and nutrient management No new legislation or regulation

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources State Programs IEPA Section 319 grant program Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant IDNR Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program IDOA Partners for Conservation Cost-Share (allocated annually to SWCDs)

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources Federal Programs NRCS Environmental Quality Incentives Program Conservation Stewardship Program Easement Programs (Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and Healthy Forests Reserve Program)

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources Illinois Agriculture Initiatives Nutrient Research and Education Council Council on Best Management Practices Keep it for the Crop Education and Outreach Program Cover Crop Training Initiative Lake Springfield Watershed Project

NREC Established by Illinois agriculture in 2012 sustainable funding mechanism for nutrient research and education Assessment of 75 cents per ton of bulk fertilizer sold in the state. Primarily paid by farmers. Support projects and programs that address the role of nutrients in enhancing Illinois crop production while minimizing environmental impact

NREC Annual funding to NREC between $2-2.5 million 2014 is second year of funding Breakout session today to hear more about specific projects currently funded

Illinois Council on Best Management Practices Coalition of agricultural organizations and agribusinesses: Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Corn Growers Association, Illinois Soybean Association, Illinois Pork Producers Association, Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association, Syngenta, GROWMARK and Monsanto Mission is to assist and encourage adoption of BMPs to protect and enhance natural resources and the sustainability of agriculture in Illinois

CBMP Goals Information: Gather current and accurate information on effective/economically viable BMPs and programs Awareness: Increase awareness of water quality issues and BMPs that address Participation: Increase farmer participation in programs and adoption of BMPs Demonstration: Demonstrate loss reductions and progress on strategy goals

KIC Education and Outreach Program Overarching program to promote BMPs so farmers aware of variety of tools available One component 4R Program Nutrient stewardship program to reduce nutrient losses from agriculture, focusing on the 4Rs of Nutrient Use: Right Source, Right Rate, Right Time, Right Place Seeks to educate farmers and suppliers to manage nutrients in a systematic approach throughout the growing season, rather than as a single application

KIC Education and Outreach Program KIC uses the following programs and tools to better educate farmers on the nitrogen cycle, nutrient uptake and optimum nitrogen rates for individual fields: On-farm nitrogen rate trials N-WATCH soil inventory and tracking program

Cover Crop Training Initiative Utilize 3 regional cover crop specialists to provide training, education and outreach to promote use of cover crops for nutrient management in production agriculture Cover crop specialists will: Establish demonstration sites Work with ag retailers, local SWCDs and IDOA to identify farmers statewide Partner with Ag Departments at Community Colleges and establish network for education and outreach throughout the state

Lake Springfield Project Purpose: To reduce agriculture s contribution of nitrate-n loading to Lake Springfield Objective: To help CWLP deliver finished drinking water no less than 5 ppm below the drinking water standard (of 10 ppm) Length of Program: 3 years

Lake Springfield Project Partners CBMP Springfield CWLP Sangamon County SWCD Lincoln Land Community College Farmers Ag retailers

Lake Springfield Project Components N-Rate trials Cover crop sites N-WATCH locations

Ongoing Strategy Work The work will continue even after the Strategy is finalized: Education and Outreach Committee Nutrient Science Advisory Committee (NNCs) Water Monitoring Council Progress will be reviewed and reported to the public every 2 years Strategy is a living document, will be reviewed every 5 years by the stakeholder group to evaluate necessary revisions

Conclusion Everyone (urban, suburban, point source, nonpoint source) has contributed to the problem, and now everyone has an opportunity to be part of the solution Reinvigoration of voluntary conservation adoption and nutrient management on the farm New focus on tracking implementation of BMPs and resulting water quality impacts No one size fits all approach for all of Illinois agriculture Our opportunity to demonstrate that voluntary conservation does work!

http://www.epa.state.il.us/water/nutrient/index.html