FIRM NAME DESIGNER: CHECKER: DATE: FPID #: DESCRIPTION: COUNTY: DRAINAGE DESIGN CHECKLIST. Designers Initials. Checkers Initials.

Similar documents
DRAINAGE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1

SECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements

Chapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification

Location Drainage Study

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

CHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Project Drainage Report

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Richland County Department of Public Works Engineering (Land Development) Division

POND SITING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

CITY OF TROY DESIGN STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS

The City of North Las Vegas (CNLV) does not allow valley gutters to be constructed across streets with right-of-way widths of 80 feet or greater.

16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land

City of Tulsa. Stormwater Design Criteria Manual

SECTION 4 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICANT S HANDBOOK VOLUME II (Design and Performance Standards Including Basin Design and Criteria)

Municipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

110 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND COLLECTION SYSTEMS

APPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

iswm TM Criteria Manual City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June Chapter 1

MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN CHAPTER 4 INDEX DRAINAGE

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Plan Name Plan No. Submitting Firm Contact Engineer. Review Date ESI Team ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS INSTITUTE PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

Chapter 6 DOCUMENTATION OF HYDRAULIC STUDIES SOUTH DAKOTA DRAINAGE MANUAL

Erosion & Sedimentation Control Policy

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON NORTH CAMPUS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT Draft Conditional Use Permit Stormwater, Sanitary Sewer, and Water Analysis Report

FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD BANK FLOOD REMEDIATION PROJECT

Chapter 7 Ditches and Channels

Stormwater Management Technical Manual

At least 2 feet above the seasonal high water table Overflow path or structure provided

Chatham Park Stormwater Manual

Stormwater Management Manual. Public Works Department City of Billings, Montana

2A Stormwater Regulations and Permitting A. Iowa Drainage Law and Resources 1 B. Regulated Activities 1

Chapter 9 - Storm Drains

City of Elgin SUBDIVISION FINAL ENGINEERING Engineering Submittal Checklist

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PERMIT

CHAPTER 12 BRIDGE DECK DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Article 20: Erosion Control and Stormwater Management

STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT

CITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

f) Culverts in series shall be spaced at least 20 feet between each other. 2.7 C Culverts

Section SNOW DISPOSAL SITE DESIGN CRITERIA

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA

DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL CHAPTER 2 DRAINAGE MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP CODE

CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER DESIGN

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

S.O.P. No. HMD

EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT (ERCAR) SAMPLE OUTLINE

APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

Sediment Basin. Fe= (Depends on soil type)

Table of Contents. 5-5 Release Rates Year Allowable Release Rate WQCV Release Rate EURV Release Rate...

LAWRENCE, KANSAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

2006 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY

DRAINAGE REPORT FOR. Creeks Crossing

Boise City Public Works General Drainage Plan Review Requirements Checklist

CACHE VALLEY STORM WATER DESIGN STANDARDS. As Amended by Logan City November 2010

2C-12 Detention Basin Outlet Structures

SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION. Alternative Names: Sump, Drywell, Infiltration Trench, Infiltration Galleries, Leach Fields

Gwinnett County Stormwater System Assessment Program

CITY OF ASTORIA PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT

TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL STANDARDS

7/16/2012. Post Construction Best Management Practices (PCBMPs) Article VIII: Post Construction Best Management Practices

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

City of Saint John. Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual

Town of New Tecumseth Engineering Design Criteria and Standards for Subdivisions and Capital Works Projects

CHAPTER 7 - INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE... 2

CONSTRUCTION SURVEY. Construction survey includes personnel, equipment, and supplies required for, but not limited to, the following:

Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts HDS 5 September 1985

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall

Construction Best Management Practices Handbook BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Drainage Report for US-50 Camino Corridor Safety Project

Understanding Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) (SWPPPS)

Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist For Design Professionals

Installation and Maintenance of Erosion Control BMPs

Design Specifications & Requirements Manual

CHAPTER 8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Maryland State Highway Administration PS DRAINAGE PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

VOLUME 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ingham County Drain Commissioner Patrick E. Lindemann 707 BUHL AVENUE P. O. BOX 220 MASON MI PH. (517) FAX (517)

Section 1000 Culverts and Bridges Table of Contents

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Outlet Structure Modeling

City of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. Drainage Guidelines for Residential Development

Continuous Simulation Modeling of Stormwater Ponds, Lakes, & Wetlands: A BUILT-IN APPLICATION OF PONDS 3.2

Engineering Plan Submittal Requirements. Revised: October 6, 2017

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

Transcription:

I. Drainage Report A. Executive Summary - Brief Overview of Project Drainage Design B. Project Description 1. Existing Conditions 2. Proposed Project Conditions 3. Project Justification Narrative - Basin Schematic and Description 4. Location Maps, Floodplain Maps, USGS Maps, SCS Maps, Drainage Map, etc. 5. Text on Maintenance of Traffic Drainage Design 6. Assessment of permanent and temporary environmental impacts 7. Assessment of inclusion of Bold Landscaping into the Drainage Design C. Design Criteria and permits required 1. List minimum criteria and determine which is controlling the drainage design 2. List all permits required and determine which is controlling 3. Document all contacts with agencies D. Drainage Map (See FDM Chapter 305 for additional criteria) 1. All offsite areas shown and labeled 2. Required Information on Existing Structures included and Field Verified 3. City Lines, WMD and local WMD's boundaries where applicable 4. Onsite and offsite topography/contours 5. Design High Water Information 6. Flood Summary Data Table for all cross drains with notes E. Drainage Calculations 1. Open Channel Flow a. Supporting Documentation - Tc, CN or C calculations b. Hydrologic Analysis - Storm frequencies and duration c. Hydraulic Analysis - Hydraulic Worksheet for Roadside Ditches - Include channel lining requirements d. Outfall ditches sized for 25YR storm 2. Stormdrain Systems a. FDOT Stormdrain Tabulations 1. Correct zone and frequency used? Please see Drainage Manual Ch 3.3 for frequency criteria. b. Supporting Documentation - Tc, CN or C calculations, drainage map with flow paths 1. Starting tailwater documented? c. Areas of special inlet placement, SE transitions, intersections, side streets, lane tapers against grade, sags d. Inlet Spacing/Spread Calculations/Bypass Flow/Debris Tolerance e. Check 50 year storm event for sag inlets with no other outlet f. Stormdrains which act as crossdrains should be checked using crossdrain criteria g. Minimum pipe slopes are sufficient to provide self-cleansing velocities (2.5 fps) h. Minimum required HGL clearance provided?

3. Optional Pipe Analysis a. Include geotechnical results of soil chemistry b. Latest version of culvert service life estimator run c. CSLE results checked for structural evaluation and cover requirements against Appendix E (Drainage Manual) 4. Cross Drains a. Description of Drainage Area 1. Natural Features 2. Existing Facilities 3. Existing Flooding/Drainage Problems 4. Bridge/Bridge Culvert category b. Previous Studies 1. Drainage Studies 2. Water Management Permits/DERM 3. FEMA - Define floodplain/floodway impacts c. Peak Design Flows 1. All Design Storm Peaks 2. FDOT Methodology d. Existing Conditions 1. Flood Stages - Source 2. Tailwater Elevation - Source 3. Headwater Elevation - Source 4. Scour - Source e. Culvert Design (Pre/Post) 1. Supporting Documentation - Tc, CN or C calculations Tailwater Methodology and calculations 2. FDOT Culvert Design Methodology 3. Headwater/Tailwater Comparison to Existing Conditions for Design Storms 4. Design HW does not exceed Allowable HW 5. 100 year HW not increased (if increased, provide evidence of no adverse impact to offsite) 6. Erosion/Scour calculations and protection requirements met? 7. Clear Zone standards met? 8. Flood Data Box Information f. Box Culvert Design (Pre/Post) 1. Supporting Documentation - Tc, CN or C calculations Tailwater Methodology and calculations 2. FDOT Culvert Design Methodology 3. Headwater/Tailwater Comparison to Existing Conditions for Design Storms 4. Design HW does not exceed Allowable HW 5. 100 year HW not increased (if increased, provide evidence of no adverse impact to offsite) 6. Include low flows evaluations or backwater curves for design flows

5. Underdrain, Vertical Column Recovery Structures or other drawdown systems a. Pollution abatement volume b. Design method c. Estimated length of underdrain for filtering pollution abatement volume d. Typical section with elevations e. Gravity flow in underdrain pipe(s) f. Estimated drawdown time to evacuate the pollution abatement volume g. Design addresses the drawdown of seasonal highwater table as applicable h. Design certified by geotechnical engineer i. Does system affect base clearance? 6. Stormwater Management a. Pond description - Wet, Dry, Detention, Retention, On-line, Off-line b. Stage storage calculations for proposed pond excluding compensation storage c. Supporting Documentation - Areas, Tc, CN or C calculations d. Computed tailwater elevation of receiving facility for appropriate design frequency event e. Hydrologic Analysis 1. Pre and Post Development Hydrographs f. Hydraulic Analysis 1. Pond Routing Calculations 2. Pond Volume Calculations 3. Water Quality Volume Calculations Included. Correct criteria used 4. Water Quality and Water Quantity Drawdown Times 5. Littoral Area Calculations (wet pond), if applicable 6. Permanent Pool Volume (wet pond). g. Computer Modeling Information 1. Model Input Data 2. Model Output Data 7. Summary of Results in Table Form 1. Pre vs. Post peak flows to receiving water 2. Design high water in pond(s). Compare to min. req'd distance below roadway base 3. 1 foot of freeboard above peak stage in pond(s) 4. Flood plain compensation addresses 5. NWL in ponds 6. Control elevation, size, and provided recovery time versus required, including recovery pond models 7. Required versus water quality volumes 8. Pre versus Post stages any where offsite HGL affected by project

8. General 1. Description of offsite easements and/or flood rights, if required 2. Check that existing drainage system will function under proposed conditions 3. Verify that improvements do not result in adverse affects on adjacent property 4. Temporary drainage addressed F. Correspondence and Supporting Documentation II. Engineering Plans (Please see FDM Part 3 and TDH for additional requirements) A. Drainage Maps (See Item D under 1.0 Drainage Report) B. Summary of Pay Items includes all drainage items C. Summary of Drainage Structures 1. Check sizes, lengths, inlet types, stations, sides, etc. 2. Check for consistent structure labeling format 3. Confirm that cross drains, side drains, ditch pavement riprap, bridge drainage, etc. are quantified in plans. D. Optional Materials Sheet 1. Check Drainage Manual Appendix E for availability, suitability, and fill height prior to inclusion 2. Are you using materials that require a design review or approval by the State Engineer? 3. Gage for metal pipe noted 4. RCP Class noted E. Quantity Sheets 1. Erosion control items, side drains, and ditch pavement summarized F. Typical Sections 1. Ditch Sections shown, where typical 2. Minimum depth of ditch shown 3. Check number of lanes sloped in one direction vs. FDM Fig. 211.2.1 & TDH 211.2.3 to determine need for hydroplaning calculations. G. Plans 1. Check Drainage and Outfall Structures, Underdrain and Cleanout Locations 2. Check Lengths of pipes and flow line information 3. Check underground utility locations and Soil Boring locations 4. Ponds labeled 5. Check consistency of stationing with all sheets 6. Check structure numbers for consistency 7. Stations for locations of pond access are included 8. Check to confirm no construction outside Right of Way 9. Jurisdictional lines shown 10. Are inlets required at super elevation transition, median lanes, sags, tapers, or intersections? 11. Are pipes to remain/be removed properly labeled? H. Profiles 1. Check Existing Ground Elevations (Beginning and End of Sheet) 2. Special Ditches plotted (including median) 3. Are special gutter grades shown and labeled where proposed grades are less than 0.3%?

I. Drainage Structures Sheets 1. Check plotting of drainage structures/pipes, any border clips need adjustments, offsets as indicated in Standards. 2. Existing structures requiring work are noted 3. Drainage structure notes include structure number, pipe sizes, flow lines, flow arrows, Standard Plan No. 4. Structure Number and station shown along right border of sheet 5. Underground utilities are shown. Gas mains running through conflict boxes not allowed 6. Existing Ground Line and Proposed Grade Plotted 7. All utility conflicts have been identified 8. Design fill heights for box culverts are shown (includes top slab thickness) 9. Check structural capacity of pipe using Appendix E of the Drainage Manual to ensure adequate cover on pipe 10. Check for adequate cover between ground elevation and pipes 11. Riprap/energy dissipators shown, quantified and labeled if required 12. Minimum depth of pipe flowlines adhere to FDOT Drainage Design Guide Chapter 6 13. Check if any structures are located within the clear zone. If so, can they be relocated or do they require protection? J. Drainage Details (Control Structures and Pond Details) 1. Check that Pond radii points and access driveway have a station offset 2. Minimum maintenance berm and littoral shelf provided 3. Pond parameters given and verified (I.e. control, SHW, Weir elevation, pond bottom, berm, slopes) 4. Check to see if a fence, gate, or sediment sump is required 5. Show existing contours/tie down slopes, sod limits 6. If relying on infiltration through the bottom of ponds/treatment swales, are sufficient notes provided in the plans to accommodate this design? 7. Geotech borings for pond shown on plans 8. Actual Pond cross sections provided with soil borings shown 9. Skimmer details required if not using Standard Plan 425-070 10. Drainage easement or floodrights required? 11. Check ponds that are "bermed up" to evaluate water level and potential for failure. K. Cross Sections 1. Check for roadway and lateral ditch intersection 2. Special ditch grade elevations shown 3. Soil borings shown w/ SHWT 4. Underground utilities (4 inch or greater) shown 5. Check low points in ditches with locations of DBI's 6. Check that toe of slope stays within Right of Way 7. Check for off-site ponding caused by project 8. Does project eliminate any existing conveyance ditches? 9. Shoulder gutter requirements met 10. Are there any v-ditches shown within the cross sections that can be avoided? 11. Check cross sections to verify that there are no locations where water will be trapped.

III. Geotechnical Report A. Boring Location and Logs B. Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater Elevations for Ponds and Roadway C. Certification of Underdrain Designs D. Geotech certification for embankment stability E. Recovery parameters provided F. Check for soil and water corrosion indicators for optional materials. IV. Drainage Issues A. Status of Design Variances or Exceptions B. Liability Concerns 1. Documentation that proposed drainage design meets clear zone requirements 2. Documentation that proposed drainage design will not affect historic stormwater discharge location, rate and quantity (as applicable), and stages C. Right of Way 1. Are easement or Right-of-Way acquisitions required for any construction activity proposed beyond the right of way lines shown on the plans? 2. Are flood rights required?