Pesticide residues in food - Monitoring programs in Europe

Similar documents
Phosphorus Regulations in Europe

EU Climate and Energy Policy Framework: EU Renewable Energy Policies

A European Food Prices Monitoring Tool

European Commission. Communication on Support Schemes for electricity from renewable energy sources

I) Background information. 1. Age

ESF Ex-Post evaluation

Eurostat current work on resource-efficient circular economy Renato Marra Campanale

Introduction to Solid Waste Management and Legal framework in the European Union

Core projects and scientific studies as background for the NREAPs. 9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Futures climate policy in Finland: Mitigation measures for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions

Update on EFSA s scientific cooperation activities with EU Member States and Third Countries

Cutting Red Tape The Member State point of view. Presentation by Hilde Van de Velde Bruges March 2010

ECONOMIC BULLETIN Q2 2017

ANNUAL PUBLICATION: detailed data. VOLUME OF EXPORTS FELL BY 4,7 PER CENT IN 2015 Export prices rose 0,7 per cent. 24 March 2016

Cross border interconnections and inter-european cooperation. Cross border interconnections and inter- European cooperation

12. Waste and material flows

.eu brand awareness. Domain names have a high awareness. About 81% of the European Internet population has heard of domain names.

Photo: Thinkstock. Wind in power 2010 European statistics. February The European Wind energy association

International Indexes of Consumer Prices,

ENERGY PRIORITIES FOR EUROPE

Circular Economy and Energy Union

Mandatory inspection of sprayers in Europe, chances for the dealers! Jaco Kole SPISE Working Group

The European Census Hub

EU Pesticides Regulations Compliance for Export. Richard Fussell CSL York, UK

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109 ( 2014 ) Laine Fogh Knudsen a *, Signe Balina b

Evolution of EU Regulatory Framework of GM Crops/Food

Work life balance as a factor of gender equality which perspective? Some findings from the European Working Conditions Survey

RFID Systems Radio Country Approvals

This document is a preview generated by EVS

The Energy Efficiency Watch Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU28

Wind in power 2014 European statistics. February 2015 THE EUROPEAN WIND ENERGY ASSOCIATION

Indicator Fact Sheet (WQ01c) Water exploitation index

European information on climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation

Waste prevention in Europe. European Environment Agency

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Sea freight data indicate weak import demand both in US and EU27. Data on inland road and rail freight indicate weak domestic activity

Role of the trade unions in the protection and interest representation of employees in Europe

Prepared for: IGD 2014

To what extent will climate and land use change affect EU-28 agriculture? A computable general equilibrium analysis

Sectoral Profile - Industry

1. Introduction. The core part of the EASA management system framework focuses on the following elements:

Presentation 2. The Common Assessment Framework CAF 2013

SHIPMENTS TO ALL COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Workshop on developed country targets. Bangkok, 3 April EU contribution

Best practices in implementing the Packaging Waste Directive to maximize efficient collection and recycling

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: ELECTORAL PROCEDURES

The Fourth Community Innovation Survey (CIS IV)

The Energy Efficiency Watch Survey

Vacancy Notice. 1. The job (7)

The Innovation Union Scoreboard: Monitoring the innovation performance of the 27 EU Member States

LEGAL BASIS COMMON RULES

How to secure Europe s competitiveness in terms of energy and raw materials? The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind

ANNEXES. to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Energy Statistics 2017 edition

Attitudes towards radioactive waste in Switzerland Report

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Austria: Experiences with the Zonal evaluation procedure Applying Regulation (EC) No.1107/2009

Bathing water results 2011 Austria

PRICE SETTING IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKETS WITHIN THE EU SINGLE MARKET

Present and future phosphorus use in Europe: food system scenario analyses

Waste-to-Energy in Europe + implementation of the Waste Framework Directive

Revision date : 27-May-2016 Version : 01. SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking

Instruments of environmental policy

International trade related air freight volumes move back above the precrisis level of June 2008 both in the EU area and in the Unites States;

EPR and packaging what are current challenges and issues :

Biogas from Co-Fermentation of Biowaste at a Waste Water Treatment Plant

Public consultation on the revision of the.eu regulation

Evolution of the EU Ecological Products Market

Energy security indices

CONCEPT PAPER. ASIA-EUROPE ENVIRONMENT FORUM 4 TH ROUNDTABLE Combine or Combust! Co-operating on Chemicals and Hazardous Substances Management

Impact of the transposition of the European Clinical Trials Directive. CEMO, Paris 17 November 2004

PoVeRE Green policy for packaging waste

Contribution of Forest Management Credits in Kyoto Protocol Compliance and Future Perspectives

Consultation on the Review of Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency

ISO/TS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

counting emissions and removals greenhouse gas inventories under the UNFCCC

Indicator Fact Sheet (WEU10) Drinking Water Quality

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

ASSESSING GOOD PRACTICES IN POLICIES AND MEASURES TO MITIGATE CLIMATE CHANGE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE. Elena Petkova

Dr Cathy Maguire European Environment Agency THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT STATE AND OUTLOOK 2015

HRD monitoring and assessment tools and their relevance for linking up national progress to European benchmarks

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Water and Food Security in Europe: Current Situation and Future Perspectives. Simone Orlandini

Synthetic Biology and Patents

INNOVATION UNION SCOREBOARD 2011

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Non-technical Innovations Definition, Measurement & Policy Implications. The new service economy: growth and implications for service innovation

New Brunswick agrifood. and seafood export. highlights

European Census Hub: A Cooperation Model for Dissemination of EU Statistics

A body of industry and contact center expertise Ipsos. to drive performance

Environmental Attitudes

Transboundary air pollution by main pollutants (S, N, O 3 ) and PM. France

How to enhance New Member States and Candidate Countries participation in FP6+

Natural Capital Accounting and the WAVES Global Partnership (Wealth Accounting and Valuation of Ecosystem Services)

ISO 8106 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Glass containers Determination of capacity by gravimetric method Test method

Retail Choice in Electricity: What Have We Learned in 20 Years?

Microsoft Dynamics GP. Enhanced Intrastat

The EU ETS: Over-allocation or Abatement?

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Transcription:

Pesticide residues in food - Monitoring programs in Europe Daniela Brocca 48th Annual Florida Pesticide Residue Workshop FPRW 2011 St. Pete Beach, Florida July 17-20, 2011

Content of the presentation 1. Pesticide residues in food EU consumer s risk perception 2. Control/monitoring activities in Europe EFSA Annual Report on Pesticide Residues 3. New EU data collection system 4. Future challenges: Cumulative Risk Assessment 2

European consumers perceptions of food risks: Results from the 2010 EUROBAROMETER Methodology: Face-to-face interviews in respondent s home Total number of interviews: 26.691 (+/- 1.000 per country) Research objectives: Assess, evaluate and monitor over time*: Consumer concerns relative to food and risks associated with the food chain Consumer confidence in food safety and in action of public authorities (*Builds on a similar survey on "risk issues" conducted in 2005) 3

Key findings on food-related risk There is no single, widespread concern mentioned spontaneously by a majority of respondents 19% of citizens spontaneously cite chemicals, pesticides and other substances When prompted, EU citizens worry the most about chemical residues in foods (e.g. pesticides, antibiotics, pollutants like mercury or dioxins) and animal cloning. Significant differences in risk perception by Member State National and European food safety agencies (EFSA) and European institutions attract a relatively high level of confidence at 64% and 57% respectively National governments (47%) 4

Risks associated with food: spontaneous responses Chemical products, pesticides and other toxic substances are the major concerns QF3: Could you tell me in your own words, what are all the things that come to your mind when thinking about possible problems or risks associated with food and eating?

Risks associated with food: Prompted responses Higher Level of Worry EU citizens worry most about chemicals in foods, pollutants and animal cloning QF4 Please tell me to what extent you are worried or not about the following issues.

Risk perception: Country differences Top concerns in Member States Pesticide residues: GREECE, LITHUANIA, ITALY, LUXEMBOURG, BULGARIA, HUNGARY, FRANCE, MALTA, SLOVENIA, GERMANY, BELGIUM, AUSTRIA Antibiotics residues in meat: CYPRUS, THE NETHERLANDS Pollutants like mercury: FRANCE Quality and freshness of food: LATVIA, LITHUANIA, PORTUGAL, SPAIN, DENMARK, MALTA, ESTONIA, IRELAND The welfare of farmed animals: SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM, FINLAND Additives in food and drinks: POLAND, ROMANIA GMOs: AUSTRIA Food poisoning from bacteria: BULGARIA, CZECH REPUBLIC, SLOVAKIA QF4: Please tell me to what extent you are worried or not about the following issues.

Pesticide residues in fruit, vegetables or cereals % of Total WorriedShift since 2005 LU 85% 14 LT 88% 12 % of Total Worried NL 53% 12 SK 71% 9 EE 67% 9 LV 78% 7 BE 72% 7 DE 75% 6 SE 59% 6 EU27 72% 2 UK 53% -12 The issue that causes the overall largest concern across the EU There are significant increases of worry since 2005 in several countries QF4: Please tell me to what extent you are worried or not about the following issues.

Monitoring of pesticide residues in food in the EU EU legislation (*) requests EU Member States: To carry out regular official controls on pesticide residues in food commodities to check compliance with Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs - legal limits) To establish national monitoring programmes To participate in a specific EU coordinated monitoring programme (voluntarily until 2008, mandatory from 2009) (*) Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/result.do?t1=v2&t2=2005&t3=396&rechtype=rech_naturel&submit=search 9

Monitoring of pesticides residue in food in the EU EU legislation also requires: To compile and collate all the information provided on the results of the analysis of the samples taken during the previous year (both national and EU monitoring programmes) An EU Annual Report to be prepared (*) (*) The Annual Reports 1996-2006 are available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fvo/specialreports/pesticides_index_en.htm The Annual reports 2007-2008 are published at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/pesticides.htm food in the EU 10

The EU Annual Report The EU Annual Report provides: An overview of the results of the controls/monitoring and analysis of findings (e.g. number of pesticide sought and found and MRL exceedences) An assessment of the consumer exposure to actual pesticide residues in food Possible reasons for MRL exceedences Recommendations on pesticides to be covered in future monitoring programmes, on risk management actions 11

2008 Annual Report (*) No of commodities/samples analysed: >350 food items >70.000 samples analyzed >14.000.000 single analytical determinations 862 distinct pesticides sought: 365 different active substances found in fruit&veg 76 in cereals (*) The 2009 Annual report will be published on the EFSA website in September 2011 12

Number of samples analyzed (*) Netherlands; 4335 United Kingdom; 2327 Greece; 2496 Romania; 3174 Hungary; 3584 France; 5063 Finland; 2083 Denmark; 2048 Austria; 1983 Belgium; 1709 Poland; 1613 Sweden; 1600 Norway; 1493 Slovenia; 1267 Ireland; 1014 Bulgaria; 971 Czech Republic; 919 Slovakia; 894 Portugal; 758 Lithuania; 527 Cyprus; 522 Estonia; 316 Iceland; 277 Luxembourg; 139 Latvia; 110 Malta; 97 Germany; 15683 Spain; 6353 Italy; 6788 (*) Total number of samples taken in 2008 by each reporting country (surveillance and enforcement samples of fruit, vegetables, cereals, processed commodities and baby food). Total 70,143 samples. 13

Origin of samples analyzed (*) Imported 20% Unknown 3% EU 77% (*) Origin of samples (EU: EU27, Iceland and Norway; Imported: countries extra-eu); surveillance and enforcement samples of fruit, vegetables, cereals, processed commodities and baby food. 14

Number of food commodities analysed (*) (*) The number of different raw commodities sampled in the 2008 national and EU programmes by each country (excluding processed and baby food). EU legislation sets MRLs for ca. 400 agricultural commodities. Apporx. 200 15 different raw commodities analysed in 2008

Number of pesticides included in the EU monitoring programme 1996-2009 Number of pesticides 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 120 78 71 55 55 47 41 42 36 32 20 20 20 13 9 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Sampling year Food of plant origin Food of animal origin 16

Number of pesticides sought (*) (*) The number of pesticides analysed in 2008 by each reporting country (surveillance samples only, EU+ national programmes). Total number pesticides: 862; average number per country: 235 17

Samples exceeding the MRLs: trend over the time 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 96.5% 96.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 94.5% 94.5% 96.1% 95.5% 95.7% 96.7% 96.6% 97.0% 3.5% 4.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.5% 5.5% 3.9% 4.5% 4.3% 3.3% 3.4% 3.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No measurable residues detected above MRL Residues detected above MRL MRL compliance rate for samples from the national and EU coordinated pesticide residue programmes 1996-2008. Note that for 2008 only surveillance samples are included, while for 1996-2007, enforcement samples are included as well 18

Samples exceeding the MRLs by food group Fruit and vegetables Cereals Processed Babyfood 96.3% 98.5% 99.1% 99.8% 3.7% 1.5% 0.9% 0.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% No measurable residues detected above MRL Residues detected above MRL MRL compliance rate for surveillance samples in the national programme and the EU coordinated pesticide monitoring programme 2008. 19

MRL exceedances: origin of samples Unknown 13% EU origin 21% Imported food 66% Exceedances of EU MRLs according to origin of sample (2008 surveillance samples of fruit, vegetables and cereals) 20

MRL exceedances: origin of samples extra-eu 21

Risk assessment EU coordinated monitoring programme (in 2008, 132 pesticides analysed in 9 crops) Analysis of randomly selected samples in order to collect data on occurrence of pesticide in fruit, vegetables and cereals representative for the European market which are appropriate to assess the actual dietary exposure of the European population Acute (short-term) risk assessment Chronic(long-term) risk assessment 22

Results acute RA Out of 499 pesticide/crop combinations for which the acute RA was needed, for 35 combinations theoretical exposure exceeded 100% of the ARfD: for those the short-term risk could not be excluded Dimethoate/omethoate on potatoes and spinach: 10,763 % and 2,938% of ARfD Methiocarb/cucumbers: 2,519% Dimethoate/omethoate on pears: 1,730% Methomyl/thiodicarb on oranges: 1,644% 23

Results acute RA Based on the frequency of samples exceeding the threshold residue level (residue leading to 100% of ARfD) the critical events were classified as: Exceptional event (<0.1%): 6 of the 35 cases Seldom events (<1%): 27 of the 35 cases Non-seldom event (>1%): 2 cases (azinphosmethyl/pears and omethoate-dimethoate/oranges) 24

Results acute RA Maximum IESTI (in % of ARfD) Frequency of exceedance of threshold residue (% of samples above the threshold) 100 1000 10000 Azinphos methyl Omethoate 1 Methomyl Chlorpropham Methomyl Methomyl Lambda cyhalothrin Procymidon Carbendazim Oxamyl Spinach Omethoate Methiocarb Chlormequat Procymidone Methamidophos Imazalil Omethoate Omethoate Tebuconazole Carbaryl Oxamyl Lambda cyhalothrin Omethoate Carbaryl Methomyl Diazinon Methomyl Procymidone 0.1 Imazalil Methomyl Imazalil Potatoes Pears Oranges Cucumbers Carrots Endosulfan Chlorpyrifos 0.01 Summary of the 2008 results of the short-term consumer risk assessment for the pesticide/crop combinations for which a potential consumer risk could not be excluded 25

Results acute RA Cypermethrin/peaches 26

Results chronic RA For all pesticides - except one (Diazinon) - a chronic exposure did not raise consumer health concerns However, with old data reporting system, the estimated exposure was based on conservative assumptions and was affected by large uncertainties Conclusion: past data submission format did not allow to perform sound exposure assessment Follow-up: In 2010 a new data reporting system (*) implemented in all 29 reporting countries (*) EFSA Data Model description available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/1457.htm 27

Results chronic RA See Appendix VI 28

Data collection: new system (2010) Principles the of EFSA Standard Data Model for data reporting: Uses a Generic Structure Designed for Sample Level data Uses a Standard Transmission format Uses Standard Terminology EFSA Data Model description available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/1457.htm 29

Data collection: EFSA new system Additives Contaminants Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 5 Field 6 Pesticides 30

Data collection: new system The new (2010) data collection system foresees: Replacement mail sending/receiving system (web interface) Storing data in a centralised EFSA location (data warehouse) Development of a database application (to query/import/export data, to avoid typing errors) Development of a data model (information reported at sample level) Defined data model elements Use of standardised terminology for e.g. pesticides and food names Implementation XML schema for data exchange/transmission 31

Data collection: new system EFSA promoted the change of the reporting system in order to make best use of the data generated at country level Improve comparability of MS results Identifying emerging trends Improvements in risk assessment Enable cumulative risk assessment 32

Cumulative Risk Assessment (CRA) Regulation (EC) 396/2005 on pesticide MRLs emphasizes the importance to carry out further work to develop a methodology to take into account cumulative and synergistic effects of pesticides Consumer exposure to residues of pesticides toxicologically acting with the same mode of action 33

Cumulative Risk Assessment 2 residues: 10.9% 3 residues: 6.5% 1 residue: 20.0% No measurable residues: 53.3% 4 residues: 4.1% 5 residues: 2.4% 6 residues: 1.3% 7 residues: 0.6% 8 residues; 0.9% Number of residues found in individual surveillance samples from the national and EU coordinated pesticide monitoring programmes 2008 34

Cumulative Risk Assessment In the context of the EU Annual Report, CRA of pesticide residues is not yet performed At present, no agreed international/european CRA methodology is available. However, EFSA has published a first scientific opinion on the issue (suitability of existing methodologies) and a second opinion (operational tool) is on the way In the future, CRA will be also performed for the consumer exposure assessment to actual residues of pesticides measured in food available for the EU consumers 35

Conclusions A well-established monitoring programme of pesticide residues in food is in place in Europe Considerable efforts have been made by Member States regarding increasing the scope of analytical methods and increase of samples analysed No clear trends regarding non-compliance rate or multiple residues was identified In several cases, a potential acute consumer health risk could not be excluded Chronic consumer health risk very unlikely, although in one case it could not be excluded definitively In the past, aggregate data were reported by Member States; this, impeded detailed analysis of data and made risk assessment inaccurate. A new data collection system has been developed/implemented in the EU in 2010. In the near future, the cumulative risk assessment will possible 36

Thank you! 37