Crop Water Requirement. Presented by: Felix Jaria:

Similar documents
Crop Water Requirements and Irrigation Scheduling

Texture Definition: relative proportions of various sizes of individual soil particles USDA classifications Sand: mm Silt:

Revised FAO Procedures for Calculating Evapotranspiration Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 with Testing in Idaho 1

Crop Water Requirement Estimation by using CROPWAT Model: A Case Study of Halali Dam Command Area, Vidisha District, Madhya Pradesh, India

TheHelper, A User-Friendly Irrigation Scheduling Tool In Florida and Hawaii A. Fares 1, M. Zekri 2 and L.R. Parsons 2. Abstract

Estimation of Irrigation Water Requirement of Maize (Zea-mays) using Pan Evaporation Method in Maiduguri, Northeastern Nigeria

ANALYSIS OF RAINFALL DATA TO ESTIMATE RAIN CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS CROP WATER REQUIREMENT USING CROPWAT MODEL

Crop Water Use Program for Irrigation

Crop water requirements for tomato, common bean and chick pea in Hudeiba, River Nile State, Sudan

AquaCrop. Chapter 2 Users guide. Version 4.0. FAO, Land and Water Division Rome, Italy. Reference Manual June 2012

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

Modified Blaney-Criddle for Excel

Factors affecting evaporation 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology. Several factors affect the rate of evaporation from surfaces:

Determination of the Optimal Date for Sowing of Wheat in Canal Irrigated Areas using FAO CROPWAT Model

In most areas of California, a mature walnut orchard

Efficient nitrogen fertility and irrigation management in California processing tomato production

KanSched2. An ET-Based Irrigation Scheduling Tool. October 2006

A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATION OF CROP COEFFICIENTS:A CASE STUDY

Irrigation Scheduling for Urban and Small Farms

Interpretation of Soil Moisture Content to Determine Soil Field Capacity and Avoid Over Irrigation in Sandy Soils Using Soil Moisture Measurements

Water requirements for major crops in different agro-climatic zones of Iraqi Kurdistan using by CROPWAT 8.0

AquaCrop A new model for crop prediction under water deficit conditions - Calibration for potato -

Water balance of savannah woodlands: a modelling study of the Sudanese gum belt region

Partitioning plant transpiration and soil evaporation with eddy covariance and stable isotope method in North China Plain

Fertility management in organic strawberries

Assesment of Crop and Irrigation Water Requirements for Some Selected Crops in Northwestern Bangladesh

Chapter 3. Principles and Practices of Irrigation Management for Vegetables

Dirk RAES, Pasquale STEDUTO, Theodore C. HSIAO, and Elias FERERES with contributions of the AquaCrop Network

BENCHMARKING METHODOLOGIES FOR WATER FOOTPRINT CALCULATION IN ΑGRICULTURE. 7 Iroon Polytechniou, Zografou, Athens

Application of a cooling tower model for optimizing energy use

MODIFICATION OF THE FAO 56 SPREADSHEET PROGRAM

Modeling Your Water Balance

Sizing Irrigation Fields

A Novel Method for Water irrigation System for paddy fields using ANN

Application of a Basin Scale Hydrological Model for Characterizing flow and Drought Trend

12/28/2016. Air. Surface Water. Ground Water. Soil. 1. Calculate agronomic rate. 2. Identify optimal fields. 3. Determine when to apply

3.3 AquaCrop parameterization, calibration, and validation guide

Tools for Improving Irrigation Management. Michael Cahn Irrigation and Water Resources Advisor University of California, Cooperative, Monterey Co

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Water Footprint for cotton irrigation scenarios utilizing CROPWAT and AquaCrop models

Tools for Improving Irrigation Management of Vegetables

EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY

Advancing Stormwater Beneficial Uses: ET Mapping in Urban Areas. Ryan Bean 1 and Robert Pitt 2

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management

Urban Greening and the UHI: Seasonal Trade-offs in Heating and Cooling Energy Consumption in Manchester, UK

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

Comparing Consumptive Agricultural Water Use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

ANNEX C: CROP WATER REQUIREMENT AND IRRIGATION SCHEDULE AGRICULTURE & IRRIGATION. December Paradis Someth Timo Räsänen

Irrigation Management for Trees and Vines

SEASONAL WATER REQUIREMENTS OF AVOCADO TREES GROWN UNDER SUBTROPICAL CONDITIONS

KanSched An ET-Based Irrigation Scheduling Tool for Kansas Summer Annual Crops

Lecture 19. Landfill hydrology

Special Report Concerning Irrigation Scheme

Irrigation Improvement Options part 1- on field irrigation

Economics of Irrigation Ending Date for Corn 1

Davie Kadyampakeni UF/IFAS CREC

AgriMet: Reclamation s Pacific Northwest Evapotranspiration Network

Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration Measurement

Can cover crops replace summer fallow?

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

Deficit Irrigation for Sugarcane in Kunigal command area R.Shreedhar & Nithya B.K.

WATER PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS FOR CENTRAL PLAINS CROPS

Soil Moisture Monitoring By Using BUDGET Model In A Changing Climate (Case Study: Isfahan-Iran)

Hydrologic Modeling with the Distributed-Hydrology- Soils- Vegetation Model (DHSVM)

CHAPTER FIVE Runoff. Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323) Instructors: Dr. Yunes Mogheir Dr. Ramadan Al Khatib. Overland flow interflow

Participatory design of farm level adaptation to climate risks in an arable region in the Netherlands

Overview of the Surface Hydrology of Hawai i Watersheds. Ali Fares Associate Professor of Hydrology NREM-CTAHR

Requirements. Part 623. National Engineering Handbook. Part 623. Irrigation Water Requirements. Department of Agriculture

Irrigation Scheduling for Maize and Indian-mustard based on Daily Crop Water Requirement in a Semi- Arid Region

BENEFITS OF MICRO IRRIGATION SYSTEM SUGAR RECOVERY & PRODUCTIVITY AMIT BHARDWAJ DY. HEAD - INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION 8 TH OCT, 2013

I/I Analysis & Water Balance Modelling. Presented by Paul Edwards

Cotton Crop Water Use. Craig W. Bednarz University of Georgia, Tifton

The Climate Impact Report (Updated 25 January 2018) The Immediate Past

Conservation Strategies for Lawn Irrigation During Drought A Colorado Experience

Placement and Interpretation of Soil Moisture Sensors for Irrigated Cotton Production in Humid Regions SITE SELECTION IN A FIELD OBJECTIVE

When does a plant need water? Water uptake by roots. Factors that influence Transpiration

Benlouali Hajar*, Redouane Choukr-Allah, Harrouni Moulay Cherif, Aziz Hirich, Mohamed Fallah

LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT

EVALUATING CENTER PIVOT, NOZZLE-PACKAGE PERFORMANCE

Progress Report (task 3) Project Title: BMPs for Florida blueberries. Contract # : Dorota Z. Haman Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Irrigation Scheduling: Sensors, Technical Tools, and Apps

Potential uses of Indices (PDSI,CMI) and other Indicators to estimate drought in Barbados. Presented by: Shontelle Stoute

Irrigation & Fertilizer Affects on Productivity, Water Use and N Balance in Rice & Maize Cropping Systems in Telangana Region, India

AN ASSESSMENT OF IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY IN THE PALESTINIAN WEST BANK

Principle Investigators:

IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON WATER AVAILABILITY AND EXTREME FLOWS IN ADDIS ABABA

Rainwater Management. Dr. Iftikhar Ahmad. College of Earth and. University of The Punjab Lahore

Lecture 1: Importance of Irrigation and Drainage

Estimation of crop coefficients and water productivity of mustard (Brassica juncea) under semi-arid conditions

Purpose and Introduction:

Water Saving in Tank Irrigation Systems in Sahel Region of Africa

SUGARCANE IRRIGATION SCHEDULING IN PONGOLA USING PRE-DETERMINED CYCLES

Water-Use Considerations for Florida-Grown Rice 1

Soil Processes: SVAT, ET, and the Subsurface. Summary

Groundwater, Mining and Sustainability in the Tropics :

Drip System Design for Established Landscape Trees and Shrubs

Large Scale Studies. UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Co

Transcription:

Crop Water Requirement Presented by: Felix Jaria:

Presentation outline Crop water requirement Irrigation Water requirement Eto Penman Monteith Etcrop Kc factor Ks Factor Total Available water Readily available water/mad Calculation of Crop water requirement Calculation of Irrigation Water requirement Calcuation Net and Grow Irrigation Requirement CropWat

Crop Water Requirement The depth of water needed to meet the water loss through evaptranspiration (ETcrop) of a diseased free crop, growing in large fields, under non restricting soil conditions including soil water and fertility and achieving full production potential under the given growing environment

Crop Evapotransipration (tomatoes)

Crop Water Requirement cont. The values for ETcrop and Crop Water Requirement are identical Crop water requirement refers to what is applied ETcrop refers to water loss through evapotransipration. Normally expressed in mm/day

Irrigation water requirement Represents the difference between the crop water requirement (Etcrop) and effective precipitation and the initial soil moisture. It also includes additional water for leaching of salts and to compensate for non-uniformity of water application.

Rainfall (mm) ETcrop (mm) 300 250 Plot of Rainfall Vs ETcrop for 2001 Rainfall_2001 ETo_2001 300 250 200 200 150 150 100 Irrigation Requirement 100 50 50 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Months Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Determination of ETcrop To determine ETcrop a 3-stage procedure is recommended: The effect of climate on Crop Water requirement (ETo) The effect of Crop Characteristics on crop water requirement (Kc) The effect of Management and environmental conditions on Crop water requirement (Ks)

Water & environmental Stress Climate Grass Reference Crop ET o Radiation Temperature Wind Speed Humidity + = Well watered grass Kc Factor ET C ET o X = Well watered Crop optimal agronomic conditions K s x K c adjusted Eto adj ET o X =

Step 1/3 -Reference ETo The effect of climate on Crop Water requirement is given by the reference crop evapotransiration (ETo) It measures the evaporative power of the atmosphere independently of crop type, crop development and management practices This is so because as water is abundantly available at the reference evapotranspiration surface soil factors do not affect ET.

Step 1/3 -Reference ETo The effect of climate on Crop Water requirement is given by the reference crop evapotransiration (Eto) Climate Grass Reference Crop ET o Radiation Temperature Wind Speed Humidity + = Well watered grass

Step1/3 - Reference ETo The principle weather parameters affecting evapotranspiration are radiation, air temperature, humidity and wind speed. Relating ET to a specific surface provides a reference to which ET from other surfaces can be related. It obviates the need to define a seperate ET level for each crop and stage of growth

Reference Evapotranspiration FAO definition: Evapotranspiration rate from A hypothetical reference crop with an assumed crop height of 0.12m, a fixed surface resistance of 70 s/m and an albedo of 0.23 This definition closely resembles an extensive surface of green grass of uniform height, actively growing, completely shading the ground and with adequate water.

Methods for determining ETo Climatic Data Required for the different Methods Method Temp Humidity Wind Sunshine Radiation Evaporation Environ. Radiation Penman Pan Blaney- Criddle FAO Penman- Monteith The choice of Method must be based on the Climatic data available and on the accuracy required.

Penman-Monteith Equation The FAO Penman-Monteith method is now recommended as the sole standard method for the definition and computation of the reference evapotranspiration. It requires radiation, air temperature, air humidity and wind speed data. Measurement should be made at 2m (or converted to that height) above an extensive surface of green grass, shading the ground and not short of water

Penman Monteith Equation ET o 0.408* * 900 T 273 1 0.34* U R G * * u * e e n * Where: Et o = Reference Evapotranspiration (mmday -1 ) R n = Net radiation at the crop surface (mmjm -2 day -1 ) G = Soil heat flux density (MJm -2 day -1 ) T = Mean daily air temperature at 2m height ( C) U 2 = Wind speed at 2m height (ms -1 ) e s = Saturation vapour pressure (kpa) e a = Actual vapour pressure (kpa) e s -e a = Saturation vapour pressure deficit (kpa) = Vapour pressure curve (kpa C -1 ) γ = Psychrometric constant (kpa C -1 ) 2 2 s a

Average ETo for different Agro climatic regions in mm/day Regions Tropical and Subtropics Mean Daily Temperature C Cool 10 C Moderate 20 C Warm > 30 C Humid and sub-humid Arid and semi-arid 2-3 2-4 3-5 4-6 5-7 6-8 Temperate Humid and sub-humid Arid and semi-arid 1-2 1-3 2-4 4-7 4-7 6-9

Potential Crop Evapotranspiration The potential evapotranspiration for a given crop (ETcrop), is the sum of crop transpiration and soil evaporation for a healthy crop at a particular stage of growth and not short of water. ETcrop = ETo x Kc (where Kc is the crop coefficient)

2/3 -The effect of Crop Characteristics on crop water requirement (Kc) The ETcrop differs distinctly from ETo as the ground cover, canopy properties and aerodynamic resistance of the crop are different from grass. To account for these characteristic differences an integrated crop coefficient (Kc) is applied to Eto. In the crop coefficient approach, ETcrop is calculated by multiplying ETo by Kc.

Crop Coefficient (Kc) Where ETc Kc ETo = Crop evapotranspiration (mm/day) = Crop Coefficient (dimensionless) = Reference Crop Evapotranspiration (mm/day) Kc is the ratio of the ETcrop and ETo and it represent the an integration of the effects of four primary characteristics that distinguish the crop from reference grass.

Factors the Distinguish the crop from Reference grass Crop Height Crop height influence the aerodynamic resistance term in the P_M equation and hence affect the vapour transfer from the crop to the atmosphere Albedo (reflectance) The albedo is affected by the fraction of the ground covered by vegetation and by the soil surface wetness. The albedo of the crop-soil surface influences the net radiation of the surface.

Factors the Distinguish the crop from Reference grass Albedo (reflectance) Net radiation is the primary source of the energy exchange for the evaporation process. Canopy Resistance The resistance of the crop to vapour transfer is affected by the leaf area, (number of stomata), leaf age, and condition. The canopy resistance influences the surface resistance Evaporation from soil The soil surface wetness and the fraction of the ground covered by vegetation influence the surface resistance.

Determining Kc Values for field and Vegetable crops The crop growing season is divided into 4 stages. Stage 1 Initial stage germination and early growth when the soil surface is not or is hardly covered by the crop (groundcover < 10%)

Determining Kc Values for field and Vegetable crops Stage 2 Crop Development From end of initial stage to attainment of effective full ground cover (groundcover 70-80%)

Determining Kc Values for field and Vegetable crops Stage 3 Mid Season Stage From attainment of effective full ground cover to time of start of maturing as indicated by discolouring of leaves or leaves falling.

Determining Kc Values for field and Vegetable crops Stage 4 Late Season Stage From end of mid-season stage until fully maturity or harvest

Typical Kc Curve Late Stage (29) Mature Stage (40) Crop Development (31) Initial (15) Kc In Kc C. D Kc L.S

3/3 ETcrop under soil water stress conditions The ETcrop discussed thus far refers to evapotranspiration of a disease-free crop, growing in very large fields, not short of water and fertilizers an Idealistic Scenario Actual Etcrop will depend on local factors

ETcrop under soil water stress conditions When the soil is wet, the water has a higher potential energy and hence is relatively free to move and is easily taken up by the plant roots.

ETcrop under soil water stress conditions In drier soils, the water has a lower potential energy (due mainly to the matric potential), and is strongly bound by capillary and absorptive forces to the soil matrix and is less easily extracted by the crop.

ETcrop under soil water stress conditions When the potential energy of the soil water drops below a threshold value, the crop is said to be water stressed.

ETcrop under soil water stress conditions The effects of soil water stress are described by multiplying the basal crop coefficient by the water stress coefficient, Ks

Total Available Water Water within the soil profile between FC and PWP PWP AWC = fc - wp

Total Available Water in the Root Zone Where TAW r = the total available water in the root zone (mm) fc = water content at field capacity (m 3 m -3 ) wp = permanent wilting point (m 3 m -3 ) Z r = rooting depth (m) Z r

Readily Available Water Although water is theoretically available until wilting point, crop water uptake is reduced well before wilting point is reached. When the soil is sufficiently wet, the soil supplies water fast enough to meet the atmospheric demands of the crop and water uptake equals Etc.

Readily Available Water When soil water drops below a threshold value, soil water can no longer be transported quickly enough towards the root to response to the transpiration demand and the crop begins to express stress.

Readily Available Water The fraction of the TAW that a crop can extract from the root zone with suffering water stress is the readily available soil moisture. RAW PWP Where RAW p = Readily available soil moisture in the root zone = Average fraction 0f TAW that can be depleted from the root zone before moisture stress occurs (0-1)

p Factor The factor p differs from one crop to another. It varies from 0.3 for shallow rooted plants at high rates of ETc (> 8mmd -1 ) To 0.7 fro deep rotted plants at low rates of ETc (<3mmd -1 ) A value of 0.5 for p is commonly used for many crops

Ks Water Stress Coefficient, K s 1.00 ϴ fc ϴ t ϴ wp 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 no soil water stress, Ks=1 RAW=p*TAW soil water limiting conditions, Ks <1 TAW 0.00 0 RAW TAW

Ks Determination of K s 1.00 0.80 0.60 ϴ fc ϴ t ϴ Dr ϴ wp D r For Dr > RAW Ks= TAW Dr TAW RAW TAW Dr ( 1 p) TAW 0.40 0.20 RAW TAW 0.00 0 RAW TAW

Ks 1.00 Determination of K s ϴ fc ϴ t ϴ Dr ϴ wp 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 TAW =160mm RAW=64 ϴ Dr = 83.4 P = 0.4 TAW Dr TAW RAW 164 83.4 1 0.4 *164 For Dr > RAW Ks= TAW Dr (1 p) TAW 0.82 0.00 0

Irrigation requirement for Tomato :12th May - 12th Sept ( Marie-Helene) (50% Dependable rainfall) Growth stage Initial Development Mid season La Months May June June July August S Decades D2 D3 D1 D2 D3 D1 D2 D3 D1 D2 D3 D ETo (mm/dec) 3.52 3.84 4.16 4.38 4.53 4.65 4.63 4.52 4.24 3.99 3.69 3. Kc 0.50 0.48 0.47 0.51 0.81 0.99 1.04 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1. ETc (mm/dec) 1.76 1.84 1.94 2.23 3.67 4.60 4.79 5.29 4.96 4.67 4.32 3. 50% dep.rain 16.30 16.30 42.30 42.30 42.30 19.77 19.77 19.77 29.93 29.93 29.93 69 Eff rain (mm/dec) 8.48 8.48 27.98 27.98 27.98 11.08 11.08 11.08 18.70 18.70 18.70 48 ASW 63.0 45.40 27.56 26.82 30.47 41.21 56.72 47.90 56.92 52.60 46.70 43 ETc (mm) 17.6 18.4 19.4 22.3 36.7 46.0 47.9 52.9 49.6 46.7 43.2 34 moisture end 45.40 35.44 36.18 32.53 21.79 6.28 15.10 6.08 10.40 16.30 19.80 28 P factor 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0. RAM 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40 Irr.reqmt (mm) 0.00 27.56 26.82 30.47 41.21 56.72 47.90 56.92 52.60 46.70 43.20 34 Net In (m3) 0.0 275.6 268.2 304.7 412.1 567.2 479.0 569.2 526.0 467.0 432.0 34 Gross irr Ig (m3) 0.0 344.5 335.3 380.9 515.1 709.1 598.8 711.4 657.5 583.8 540.0 43 Drip 0.0 306.2 298.0 338.6 457.9 630.3 532.2 632.4 584.4 518.9 480.0 38 Effective rain = (rainfall -5)*.075

CropWat