Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

Similar documents
General Information on Nitrogen

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes DENITRIFICATION

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

Biological Nutrient Removal Processes

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal: A State of the Art Review

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

SECTION 14.0 BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

IWA Publishing 2012 Water Practice & Technology Vol 7 No 3 doi: /wpt

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Study of Kinetic coefficients of a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) for municipal wastewater treatment

Table of Contents. 4.2 Biological Phosphorus Removal In Wastewater. 4.6 Nitrification and Denitrification in Wastewater

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Comnletely Mixed Activated SIud2e (CMAS) Bioreactor Desi2n Eguations

Modeling biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems _ The case of Crowborough Sewage Treament Works, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Advances in Wastewater Treatment Technology

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

TROUBLESHOOTING BNR PROCESSES E. Stone, S. Walker, R. Reardon Carollo Engineers, Inc.

MAINSTREAM DEAMMONIFICATION

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Closed Loop Reactor (CLR) Process. Innovative Technology, Flexible Orientation and Energy Saving Designs

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

19. AEROBIC SECONDARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

Biological Nutrient Removal vs. Chemical Nutrient Removal

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

Aeration control in a full-scale activated sludge wastewater treatment plant: impact on performances, energy consumption and N2O emission

A General Description of the Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1)

Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal for sustainable wastewater treatment and achieving energy neutrality

Implementing an Improved Activated Sludge Model into Modeling Software. A Thesis. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements.

SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR FOR ORGANICS AND NITROGEN REMOVAL: MODELING AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION VELMURUGAN SUBRAMANIAN

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Carbon Redirection and its Role in Energy Optimization at Water Resource Recovery Facilities

AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Nutrient Removal Enhancement Using Process Automation at Holly Hill

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Managing the Risk of Embracing Disruptive Technology

Renovation of secondary treatment facility into the Step-feed Biological Nitrogen Removal Process by the effective use of the existing structure

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

COMPARISON OF PROCESS ALTERNATIVES FOR ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL: PERSPECTIVES ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

SKI RESORT MBR WWTP: CHALLENGES OF YEAR-ROUND OPERATION WITH VERY HIGH FLOW AND LOAD VARIATIONS BETWEEN SEASONS

MODIFIED SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTOR (MSBR) A NEW PROCESS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Biological Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal from Anaerobic Digestate in a Demonstration Sequencing Batch Reactor

Module 22 : Sludge Management

Photo-Activated Sludge System (PAS): A novel algal-bacterial biotreatment for nutrient rich wastewater

Comparison on the Treatment Performance of Full-scale Sewage Treatment Plants using Conventional and Modified Activated Sludge Processes

ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEM OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESSES USING IN- SITU AMMONIUM AND NITRATE PROBES

2/22/2011. Presentation Outline. Overview of Wastewater Aeration. Basic Equation. Some Acronyms. dc dt. dc dt TDS BP T C L

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua has Positive Long-Term Effects. Biological Help for the Human Race

Water Quality Control in RAS: The importance of an anaerobic treatment stage for removing nitrate, phosphate, and off-flavor compounds

Onsite Nitrogen Removal

Dr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz & Victor Ferre. Contents

Modelling the WWTP of Nîmes and Validating the Ammonair Control Algorithm to Ensure Low Energy Consumption and N 2 O Emissions

An Assessment of Nitrification in an RBC Plant

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Sustainability and Innovation

MODEL-BASED AERATION SYSTEMS DESIGN - CASE STUDY NANSEMOND WWTP

1/22/2013. Low Energy Process Control

Operation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

NUTRIENT REMOVAL FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTER SIDE-STREAM AT THE BLUE PLAINS AWTP Overlook Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20032

Innovative Use of Dissolved Air Flotation with Biosorption as Primary Treatment to Approach Energy Neutrality in WWTPs

Short-term and long-term studies of the co-treatment of landfill leachate and municipal wastewater

In 2010, municipal wastewater treatment facilities

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Oxygen Transfer - RBCs

TROUBLESHOOTING OF NITRIFICATION UPSETS AT PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

6. Activated Sludge Process : Introduction

Prepared by the Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants Task Force of the Water Environment Federation

Optimizing Nutrient Removal With Instrumentation. John Rutledge Hach RSM-Wastewater in NC & SC

Technical Memorandum-Low Cost Retrofits for Nitrogen Removal at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Upper Long Island Sound Watershed

The Fate of Ammonia in Facultative Lagoon Sludge Treatment Processes: An Investigation of Methods for Reducing Ammonia in Recycle Streams:

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors


Evaluation of Glycerol and Waste Alcohol as Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification. Kshitiz Uprety

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Emerging Technologies in Sludge Minimization

This Fact Sheet was prepared to provide information on the types of biological nutrient removal technologies, nutrient removal efficiencies, and the

Transcription:

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems Richard O. Mines, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Environmental Engineering Mercer University 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conference Orlando, FL

Activated Sludge Background Activated Sludge Schematic Microbial composition Substrate utilization Solids retention time (SRT) Nitrification stoichiometry May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 2

Activated Sludge Background Continued Biokinetic Equations Substrate Biomass Sludge Production Oxygen Requirements May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 3

ACTIVATED SLUDGE FLOW SCHEMATIC Q S o Aeration Basin X, V, S e Q + Q r X, S e Secondary Clarifier Q e X e X o S e Q r, X w, S e Return Activated Sludge Waste Activated Sludge Q w, X w May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 4

Microbial Composition C 60 H 87 O 23 N 12 P 1 MW = 1374 12.2 % Nitrogen by Weight 2.3 % Phosphorus by Weight May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 5

Substrate Utilization C + O 2 Heterotrophs CO 2 + Energy C + N + P + C 60 H 87 O 23 N 12 P New Biomass C 60 H 87 O 23 N 12 P + CO 2 + NH 3 + PO 4 May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 6

Solids Retention Time (SRT) SRT ( days) = Total Biomass Biomass Wasted in System from System May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 7

Nitrification (neglecting synthesis) NH + Nitrifiers 4 + 2 O 2 NO 3 + 2 H + + H 2 O 4.57 kg of oxygen required per kg of NH 4 + - N oxidized 7.14 kg of alkalinity as CaCO 3 consumed per kg of NH 4 + - N oxidized. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 8

Effluent Soluble Substrate Concentration S e = K S (1+ b SRT ) SRT ( Y k b) 1 May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 9

Biomass Concentration X = Y ( S o S e ) SRT ( 1 + b SRT) θ May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 10

Waste Sludge Production P X Y Q ( S S ) = o e 1 + b SRT May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 11

O 2 Requirements O 2 = Q (1+ 1.42Y ) ( S o S e ) + 1.42b XV + NOD NOD = Q ( TKN o ) (4.57) May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 12

Biological Nitrogen Removal Schematic Denitrification stoichiometry Pre-anoxic zone sizing Post-anoxic zone sizing May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 13

Pre- & Post-Denitrification Systems Mixed Liquor Recycle Influent Mixer Oxic Anoxic Oxic Anoxic Oxic Secondary Clarifier Effluent Return Activated Sludge Waste Activated Sludge May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 14

Denitrification 6 NO 3 + 2CH 3 OH 6 NO 2 + 2CO 2 + 4 H 2 O 6 NO 2 + 3CH 3 OH 3N 2 + 3CO 2 + 3H 2 O + 6OH 6 NO 3 + 5CH 3 OH Denitrifiers 3N 2 + 5CO 2 + 7 H 2 O + 6OH 3.57 kg of alkalinity produced per kg of NO 3 N reduced. 2.86 kg of oxygen available per kg of NO 3 N reduced. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 15

Pre-Anoxic Zone Sizing SDNR 1 = 0.03 ( F M ) 1 + 0.029 ( F M ) = Q S ( X V ) 1 o 1 (Burdick et al., 1982) SDNR 1 = Specific denitrification rate( pre anoxic), days 1 o V ANOXIC = TNOR(1000 g / kg)-0.03( S )(Q)(1.06 ) T-20 0.029(X)(1.06 ) T-20 May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 16

Post-Anoxic Zone Sizing SDNR 2 = 0.12 ( ) 0.706 ( ) ( T C 20 C SRT 1.02 ) Overall (Burdick et al., 1982) SDNR 2 = Specific denitrification rate, d 1 V Anoxic = TNOR ( 1000 g / kg) 2 ( )( ) 2 X SDNR 2 May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 17

Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Schematic: anaerobic zone precedes aerobic zone. Acinetobacter phosphorus composition Anaerobic or fermentation zone sizing May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 18

Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic System Mixed Liquor Recycle Influent Mixer Anaerobic Mixer Anoxic Oxic Effluent Secondary Secondary Clarifier Return Activated Sludge Waste Activated Sludge May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 19

Acinetobacter Composition 4 to 8 % Phosphorus by weight May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 20

Anaerobic/Fermentation Zone Sizing P Removed = TP o SP P Removed = mg/l of phosphorus removed, TP o = Influent total phosphorus concentration into biological process, mg/l, and SP = Effluent soluble phosphorus from process, mg/l. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 21

Volume of Anaerobic Zone COD:TP ratio = 20:1 to 43:1 1 V = Q Anaerobic 24 [ 0.2557( PRemoved ) 0.7242] h V anaerobic = Volume of anaerobic zone, m 3 Equation developed from the data developed by Randall et al., 1992. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 22 d

Volume of Anerobic Zone COD:TP ratio = 40:1 to 69:1 1 V = Q Anaerobic 24 [ 0.8850( PRe moved ) 2.3742] h V anaerobic = Volume of anaerobic zone, m 3 Equation developed from the data developed by Randall et al., 1992. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 23 d

Design Procedure Size the aerobic zone based on the washout point of Nitrosomonas. Size the pre-anoxic zone using the specific denitrification equation developed by Burdick et al., 1982. Size the anaerobic zone using the equations developed by Randall et al., 1992. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 24

Heterotrophic Biokinetic Coefficients Heterotrophic Biokinetic Constants at 20E C Y = 0.6 g VSS/g BOD 5 b = 0.06 days -1 k = 5 days -1 K s = 60 mg/l BOD 5 Heterotrophic Biokinetic Constants at 15E C Y = 0.6 g VSS/g BOD 5 b = 0.05 days -1 k = 3.2 days -1 K s = 39 mg/l A temperature correction coefficient (1) of 1.04 was used for correcting b whereas a 1 of 1.09 was used for correcting k and K s. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 25

Autotrophic Biokinetic Coefficients Nitrosomonas Biokinetic Constants at 20EC Y NS = 0.15 g VSS/g NH + 4 - N b NS = 0.05 days -1 k NS = 3 days -1 K NS = 10 0.051T-1.148 = 0.74 mg/l Nitrosomonas Biokinetic Constants at 15EC Y NS = 0.15 g VSS/g NH 4 + - N b NS = 0.04 days -1 k NS = 1.95 days -1 K NS = 10 0.051 T-1.148 = 0.41 mg/l A temperature correction coefficient (1) of 1.04 was used for correcting b whereas a 1 of 1.09 was used for correcting k and K s. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 26

Calculate Nitrosomonas Growth Rate K [ ] ( ) 0098. ( T 15) µ ( ) MAX NS = 047. e 1 083372.. ph DO DO + DO 1 (SRT ) MIN = ( µ MAX ) ( NH -N ) K +( NH - N ) NS 4 + O NS 4 + O -b NS May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 27

Calculate Design & Overall SRTs (SRT ) = (SRT) (SF)(PF) DESIGN MIN (SRT ) =(SRT ) (MF) OVERALL DESIGN May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 28

Multiplication Factor (MF) MF = 1 [ 1 A][ 1 B] A = Anaerobic zone fraction of total reactor volume B = Anoxic zone fraction of total reactor volume May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 29

Calculate Effluent Substrate Concentration (S e ) S = e [ ] K 1 + b(srt ) s OVERALL [(SRT ) ( Yk -b) - 1] OVERALL May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 30

Calculate Effluent NH 4+ - N Concentration ( NH + 4 -N ) = e K NS [1 + b NS (SRT ) DESIGN ] (SRT ) [Y k -b ] -1 DESIGN NS NS NS May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 31

Calculate Nitrogen to be Oxidized (NO) NO = TKN o (NH 4+ ) e - N SYN N = SYN Y( S - S ) F [1+b(SRT ) o e N e N OVERALL ] + (X ) F May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 32

Calculate Oxic Volume V OXIC = Q(SRT ) X Y ( S - S ) 1 + b(srt ) DESIGN o e DESIGN + X L May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 33

Anoxic Zone Calculations N= NO(Q) (MLR+ RAS + Q) N = Effluent & MLR nitrate concentration, mg/l May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 34

Mass of Nitrates to be Removed in Anoxic Zone - 3 NO - N = (DO) MLR 0.35 g NO - N g O2 ( - ) 3 EQ (MLR) 1kg 1000g NOR = [( RAS + MLR) N] 1 kg 1000g - TNOR = NOR+( NO -N ) 3 EQ May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 35

Calculate Anoxic Volume o V ANOXIC = TNOR(1000 g / kg)-0.03( S )(Q)(1.06 ) T-20 0.029(X)(1.06 ) T-20 May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 36

Sludge Production & New Overall SRT P = X ( ) Y So- S 1 + b (SRT ) e OVERALL + X L (Q) 1kg 1000g ( SRT ) OVERALL = X ( V + V + V ) OXIC ANOXIC P X ANAEROBIC May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 37

Check SRT values If the new overall SRT is not within 5% of the old overall SRT, the procedure should be repeated. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 38

Oxygen Requirements O 2 = CBOD + NOD - DOC 1kg CBOD = { Q[( 1 142. Y )( SO Se)] + 142. ( b)( X )( VOXIC)} 1000g 1kg NOD = Q( 457. )( NO) 1000g DOC = go Q [ ] gno N NO NO N 2 1 286. ( 3 ) e 1000 kgg 3 May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 39

Alkalinity Requirements ALK e ( NO) + 3. [ NO N ] = ALK 7.14 57 o May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 40

Conclusions A step-by-step procedure has been presented for designing a three-stage, nitrogen and phosphorus removal system. Biokinetic equations developed by Lawrence & McCarty (1970) were used for sizing the aerobic zone with Nitrosomonas being the growth limiting microbe. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 41

Conclusions continued The pre-anoxic zone was sized based on the specific denitrification equation developed by Burdick et al., 1982. The anaerobic or fermentation zone was sized based on the equations developed from data presented by Randall et al., 1992. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 42

Conclusions continued The 4-stage, pre- and post- anoxic BNR system has been validated and presented in the following paper: Mines, R.O.(1997) Design and Modeling of 4-Stage Single- Sludge Systems, Advances in Environmental Research, 1 (3) 323-332. Plans are to validate the anaerobic equations after collecting data from an A 2 /O facility. May 22, 2001 World Water & Environmental Resources Conferences 43