Present Status of Kyoto University Research Reactor, KUR

Similar documents
Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Legislative Framework for the Regulation of Decommissioning at Egypt. Prof. Dr. Farouk M. A. Rahman

Topics on Current Nuclear Regulation in Japan

Preparedness at PFBR Kalpakkam to meet the challenges due to Natural events Prabhat Kumar, Project Director, PFBR, Director construction BHAVINI

The 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations

DESIGN AND SAFETY PRINCIPLES LEONTI CHALOYAN DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER ON MODERNIZATION

Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

German contribution on the safety assessment of research reactors

Design of Traditional and Advanced CANDU Plants. Artur J. Faya Systems Engineering Division November 2003

Brazilian Operator s Response to Fukushima Daiichi Accident Luiz Soares Technical Director

Study on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs

Lessons Learned from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident and Consequent Safety Improvements

Post-Fukushima Assessment of the AP1000 Plant

Current Status and Future Challenges of Innovative Reactors Development in Japan

CNE Cernavoda Response to Fukushima Event/EU Stress Test Requirements

Enhancement of Nuclear Safety

Improvements Needed in Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments: Lessons Learned from Fukushima

Development of technologies for the processing and disposal of radioactive waste

Isolation Condenser; water evaporation in the tank and steam into the air. Atmosphere (in Severe Accident Management, both P/S and M/S)

APR1400 Safe, Reliable Technology

HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES

Regulation of existing and new nuclear power stations in South Africa in the light of the Fukushima Accident

Frequently Asked Questions: Japanese Nuclear Energy Situation

Safety Enhancement of Nuclear Power Plant Post Fukushima. Kumiaki Moriya

SENIOR REGULATORS MEETING Strengthening the Implementation of Defence in Depth IAEA Perspective

HTR reactors within Polish strategy of nuclear energy development Cooperation with Japan

OVER VIEW OF ACCIDENT OF FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPSs AND FUTURE PLANNING TOWARD D&D

SAFETY GUIDES. Deterministic Safety Assessment РР - 5/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY

Status of the FRM-II Project at Garching. Hans-Jürgen Didier, Gunter Wierheim Siemens AG, Power Generation (KWU), D Erlangen

Occupational Radiation Protection in Radioactive Waste Management

THE NATIONAL REPORT OF SOUTH AFRICA FOR THE SECOND EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF THE CONVENTION FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY

RESULTS OF THE GRADUAL UPGRADING AT BOHUNICE WWER - 440/230 NPP

European level recommendations Sect. in NAcP 2 Generic recommendation for WENRA, Finland participates and follows the work.

Chapter VI. VI.Situation regarding efforts to address lessons learned (28 items)

Measures against Earthquakes and Tsunamis in View of the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

ANTICIPATED ANALYSIS OF FLAMANVILLE 3 EPR OPERATING LICENSE - STATUS AND INSIGHTS FROM LEVEL 1 PSA REVIEW

Design Safety Considerations for Water-cooled Small Modular Reactors As reported in IAEA-TECDOC-1785, published in March 2016

Ensuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety

Decommissioning Group Ketut Kamajaya

The Evolution of System Safety in the Canadian Nuclear Industry

Post-Fukushima Action Plan in Korea. WNU-SI 2011, August 11 Christ Church, Oxford

SYSTEMATIC AND DESIGN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS OF NPPS IN CZECH REPUBLIC

Module 05 WWER/ VVER (Russian designed Pressurized Water Reactors)

Summary. LOCA incidents: Gas and liquid metal cooled reactors. List of LOCA incidents: 3-4

OperatiOn and safety report Of MOchOvce and BOhunice v2 nuclear power plants

Medical Isotope Production by Electron Accelerators. R.S. Orr University of Toronto

Summary on Fukushima Related Activities in Japan

FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT: LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE ACTIONS FROM THE RISK PERSPECTIVES

OPG Proprietary Report

XII. Lessons Learned From the Accident Thus Far

A Research Reactor Simulator for Operators Training and Teaching. Abstract

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT PSA IN DAYA BAY NUCLEAR POWER STATION

Modelling an Unprotected Loss-of-Flow Accident in Research Reactors using the Eureka-2/Rr Code

Clédola Cássia Oliveira de Tello. Pablo Andrade Grossi

Provision of containment integrity at Russian VVER NPPs under BDBA conditions

Concepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant

Nuclear Power Reactors. Kaleem Ahmad

COLD NEUTRON SOURCE AT CMRR

Contents of summary. 1. Introduction

Chapter 3 Accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: Sequences, Fission Products Released, Lessons Learned

High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Now More Than Ever!

Belgian Stress Test Nuclear Power Plants (BEST)

Advanced Fuel CANDU Reactor. Technical Summary

NUCLEAR FUEL AND REACTOR

Development and use of SAMGs in the Krško NPP

PLAN FOR MOATA REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING, ANSTO

Assessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant

The EU-Stresstest Dr. Christoph Pistner

Use of PSA to Support the Safety Management of Nuclear Power Plants

Monitoring of the EU Stress test improvement actions in neighbouring countries

The Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN - Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire),

Nuclear Power and Nuclear Safety Post Fukushima

Current Status of Research and Development on System Integration Technology for Connection between HTGR and Hydrogen Production System at JAEA

Japan s Energy White Paper 2017

Are We Safer Now? The Future of Nuclear Power in the Northwest 3.5 Years After Fukushima

EFFICIENCY OF FORTUM'S CSTREAT AND SRTREAT IN CESIUM AND STRONTIUM REMOVAL IN FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NPP ABSTRACT

CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Power Generation. Ronaldo Jenkins Electrical Engineering Branch Chief Office of New Reactors (NRO)

Recent Approaches related to Safety Enhancement of Operating NPPs in Korea Tae Eun JIN KEPCO E&C

Mid-and-Long-Term Roadmap towards the. Decommissioning of TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi. Nuclear Power Station

The Fukushima Nuclear Accident: Insights on the Safety Aspects

NRA s Regulatory Perspectives on Decommissioning of TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

IV. Occurrence and Development of the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations

NPP Simulators Workshop for Education - Passive PWR NPP & Simulator Overview

Nuclear Accidents. William M. Murphy. Professor of Geological and Environmental Sciences California State University, Chico

Full MOX Core Design in ABWR

KIPT ACCELERATOR DRIVEN SYSTEM DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE

Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA): Case Study Leibstadt NPP. Dr. Olivier Nusbaumer Probabilistic Safety Analysis Kernkraftwerk Leibstadt AG

International Atomic Energy Agency. Impact of Extreme Events on Nuclear Facilities following Fukushima. Dr C H Shepherd Nuclear Safety Consultant, UK

REGULATION ON ENSURING THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

LEU Conversion of the University of Wisconsin Nuclear Reactor

The Characteristics and Irradiation Capabilities of MARIA research reactor in NCBJ Świerk

CAREM Prototype Construction and Licensing Status

Gerhart Grinanger, NOELL GmbH, Postfach 6260, D-8700 Wizrzburg, Germany

Module 06 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)

Nuclear accident in Fukushima-I nuclear power plant: Critical Analysis

Advanced Technologies for Fuel Debris Retrieval towards Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning

FOSH Forsmark Safety Enhancement Project Post-Fukushima actions at Forsmark NPP

Transcription:

18th IGORR conference/iaea Technical Meeting 3-7 Dec. 2017, Sydney, Australia Present Status of Kyoto University Research Reactor, KUR Ken NAKAJIMA Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University 1

Accident of Fukushima Daiichi NPP on March 11, 2011 SBO & Loss of UHS Loss of Cooling function Hydrogen explosion Release of Radioactive nuclides Shutdown: OK, Cooling & Confinement: NG 2

Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) (established in September 2012) 3

New Nuclear Regulations in Japan Reform of Regulation system (organization) All the nuclear regulations (NPPs, RRs, Fuel fabr. etc.) are conducted by the independent body, Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA). NRA has been established in Sept. 2012. Revision of laws, codes, guides, etc. Those relating to Nuclear Regulation and Emergency Preparedness have been revised. New safety requirements for RRs have been executed in Dec. 2013. All the RRs must comply with the requirements. 4

Research Reactors in Japan (3 in operation) Name Type Power (kw) Start Year Utilization Present status Owner JRR-3* Pool 20,000 1990 Multi-purpose JRR-4** Pool 3,500 1965 Multi-purpose TRIGA 300 NSRR* (Pulsing) (23,000,000) 1975 Fuel behavior experiments Critical Assembly Reactor physics Temp. TCA** (C.A.) 0.2 1962 experiments Shutdown JAEA/Tokai FCA** C.A. Fast 2 1967 ibid. STACY* C.A. Homog. 0.2 1995 ibid. Homog. 10 Criticality accident TRACY** (Pulsing) (5,000,000) 1995 experiment JMTR** Tank 50,000 1968 Multi-purpose HTTR* High Temp Gas 30,000 1998 HTGR plant test ibid. JAEA/Oarai FBR fuel & material JOYO* Fast, Na Cooled 140,000 1977 irradiation Reactor physics NCA C.A. 0.2 1963 experiments ibid. Toshiba UTR-KINKI ARGONAUT 0.001 1961 ibid. Operation Kinki Univ. KUR Tank 5,000 1964 Multi-purpose Reactor physics KUCA C.A. 0.1 1974 experiments Operation Kyoto Univ. * Under safety review by NRA (5 RRs). ** To be decommissioned (5 RRs). Revised from IAEA Research Reactors Database http://nucleus.iaea.org/rrdb/rr/reactorsearch.aspx?rf=1 5

Research Reactors in Japan (3 in operation) Name Type Power (kw) Start Year Utilization Present status Owner JRR-3* Pool 20,000 1990 Multi-purpose JRR-4** Present Pool status 3,500 1965 Multi-purpose TRIGA 300 NSRR* (Pulsing) (23,000,000) 1975 Fuel behavior There are14 RRs in Japan at experiments present. Critical Assembly Reactor physics Temp. TCA** All (C.A.) RRs have 0.2 to clear 1962 the safety experiments review by Shutdown the NRA JAEA/Tokai to FCA** re-start C.A. Fast under the 2 new 1967 regulation ibid. requirements. STACY* C.A. Homog. 0.2 1995 ibid. Eight Homog. RRs have 10 submitted the Criticality application accident for the safety TRACY** (Pulsing) (5,000,000) 1995 review, and three of them (UTR-KINKI, experiment KUCA and JMTR** KUR) Tank have cleared 50,000 the 1968 review Multi-purpose and re-started in 2017. HTTR* High Temp Gas 30,000 1998 HTGR plant test ibid. JAEA/Oarai Five RRs are determined to FBR be fuel decommissioned & material in the JOYO* Fast, Na Cooled 140,000 1977 irradiation near future. Reactor physics NCA C.A. 0.2 1963 experiments ibid. Toshiba UTR-KINKI ARGONAUT 0.001 1961 ibid. Operation Kinki Univ. KUR Tank 5,000 1964 Multi-purpose Reactor physics KUCA C.A. 0.1 1974 experiments Operation Kyoto Univ. * Under safety review by NRA (5 RRs). ** To be decommissioned (5 RRs). Revised from IAEA Research Reactors Database http://nucleus.iaea.org/rrdb/rr/reactorsearch.aspx?rf=1 6

Kyoto Univ. Research Reactor Institute (KURRI) Established in 1963 Joint research institute opened to all Japanese universities Located at Main Facility Kumatori/Osaka KUR (Kyoto University Research Reactor) & Hot Lab. KUCA (Kyoto University Critical Assembly) Electron LINAC (Linear Accelerator) Very close to Kansai International Airport Proton Accelerators (Cyclotron, FFAG) Co-60 Irradiation Facility Various experimental training courses have been offered for students using those facilities. 7

Kyoto University Research Reactor (KUR) Light water moderated thermal reactor with EU First criticality was attained in 1964. Max. Power is 5 MW Change of fuel to low-enriched uranium finished in 2010. (Neutron (Neutron Radiography) Guide Tube) E-2 B-4 Online Isotope Heavy Separator Water E-3 Tank B-3 E-4 (LowTemp. irrad. facility) E-1 B-1 (Positron beam facility) B-2 (Large material irrad. facility) Neutron irradiation and beam experiments Pneumatic tubes Neutron radiography facility Controlled irradiation facility Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) facility for cancer treatment Positron beam facility (Newly installed) etc. 8

New Regulation Requirements Emphasis on defense-in-depth concept. - Prepare multi-layered protective measures and, for each layer, achieve the objective only in that layer regardless of the measures in the other layers Assessment and enhanced measures against extreme natural hazards. - Introduce accurate approaches in assessment of earthquake and tsunami and measures against tsunami inundation. - Introduce assessment of volcano, tornado, & forest fire. Prevention of common cause failures. - Enhance measures against fire, internal flooding, & loss of power. - Make much account of diversity and independence. Protective measures against severe accidents and terrorism. - For research reactors, those measures are not legally required; however, the NRA requests some measures even for research reactors. Back-fitting to the existing plants. 9

KUR Safety Re-evaluation/Measures External Natural Hazards Earthquake, Tornado, Volcano, Forest fire (No Tsunami hazard for KUR) Internal Hazards Internal fire, Internal flooding, Loss of power Against those internal hazards, the multiplicity and diversity of the safety systems have been enhanced. Severe Accidents LOCA as BDBA ex) LOCA + All Rods Stuck + SBO 10

Safety Re-evaluation/Measures: Earthquake Flow chart to select S-class facility Assume Loss of All Safety Functions (Shutdown, Cooling, Confinement) Evaluate Public Dose Evaluation of basis ground motions Median Tectonic Line Public Dose >5mSv? No Yes S-class Facility Existed No S-class Facility Existed 11

Safety Re-evaluation/Measures: Earthquake Horizontal Accelerations Control Rods Core Tank Primary Coolant Line Boundary to be protected against Earthquake (S-class) 12

Safety Re-evaluation/Measures: Tornado Maximum wind speed of Tornado :92m/s according to the Guide of Tornado evaluation for NPPs Emergency actions will be taken when the tornado alert was activated ; Reactor shutdown Evacuation of cars parked at the designated areas close to the KUR facilities. Protection Cage for Cooling Tower of Emergency Generator (EG1) 13

Safety Re-evaluation/Measures: Tornado KUR Parking EG1 Parking Evacuation area EG2 Parking Car Evacuation for Tornado Alert 200m 14

Safety Re-evaluation/Measures: Volcano & Forest Fire Volcano It was no hazard due to the volcanos located within the area of 160km from KUR. However, there is a possibility of volcanic ash falling from the volcanos out of the area. It was evaluated that the maximum deposit thickness of the ash was 2cm, and it did not affect the safety of KUR. Forest Fire Inside the site, there is a small forest on the south of KUR. To protect the KUR facilities from the forest fire, we have constructed a fire-protection area between the forest and the facilities, in which water is sprinkled for the prevention of fire spreading by the persons on duty when the fire is detected. Construction of Fire-Protection Area 15

For the Loss of External Power Safety Measures of KUR (existing before the Fukushima Accident) No power used for Shut-down and Core-flooding Emergency Diesel Generator(s) and Uninterrupted Power Supply are available. For the Loss of Cooling Function (Core-Flooding) Emergency Core Cooling Systems Water injection with Firehydrant Feed rate: 15m 3 /h x 2pumps Reactor room Feed rate: 5m 3 /h Feed from Spent fuel pool Feed from Sub-pile room for leaked water Core Feed rate: 20m 3 /h Feed from Water tower Water tower (100m 3 ) Spent fuel pool Sensor (High) Sensor(Low) Sub-pile room 16

Additional Safety Measures (post Fukushima) For additional safety measures; a 40ton water storage tank was settled near the reactor room, a portable fire pump, a portable power generator, an additional water injection line and an additional power supply line were prepared. Emergency power supply Additional water injection line line 17

Modification of Emergency Power Supply for KUR For the Loss of External Power No power used for Shut-down and Core-flooding Emergency Diesel Generator(s) and Uninterrupted Power Supply are available. For the loss of external power, an emergency diesel generator (EG) was installed for KUR. In addition, there was another EG for KUCA, a critical assembly with the maximum power of 100W. In the safety review for KUCA, it was concluded that it was not necessary to facilitate the EG for KUCA because KUCA required no cooling system due to its low power. Then, we have modified the power distribution system from the EGs so that the both EGs can supply the power to KUR in emergency cases. Moreover, the battery power supply system, which would be used for the instrumentation, has been change to the larger capacity one. 18

Modification of Emergency Supply for KUR EG1 EG2 EG1 EG2 Power Panel Manual Switching Power Panel Power Panel Auto Switching Power Panel Others KUR KUCA Others KUR Auto Switching KUCA UPS UPS Auto Switching UPS Multiplicity & Diversity 19

Additional Safety Measures to enhance general safety Redundancy of Power Supply External power supply: 1 line 2 lines Additional Emergency Diesel Generator for Non-reactor facilities including the telephone and network systems Additional lines (cables) connecting each facility for the back-up of power supply Redundancy of Water Supply In addition to the groundwater, public water supply with a 500ton storage tank will be introduced. Those measures were completed in FY2013. 20

Safety Re-evaluation for BDBA: Conditions For the BDBA evaluation, the following conditions are added to the DBA evaluation. Loss of Shutdown function KUR has four shim rods for shutdown, and one rod stuck condition has been employed for the DBA evaluation. For the BDBA evaluation, all rods stuck condition is employed. Loss of Cooling function (Core Flooding function) LOCA occurs due to the break of the primary coolant line (one of the inlet or outlet lines) between the core and the main shutoff valve. For BDBA evaluation, no water feed pumps are available, and the water tower is not available, too. (Because they are not seismic S- class facilities.) 21

Safety Re-evaluation for BDBA: Results Loss of Shutdown function Even for the all rods stuck case, the power decreases securely due to the negative reactivity caused by temperature rise. For the backup of shutdown function, the boronic acid powder is prepared that will be thrown into the core water. Loss of Cooling function (Core Flooding function) The core flooding can be kept by using the portable fire pump, and the 40ton tank + SF pool as the water resource. Under the present operation pattern* of KUR, the cooling (flooding) time over than 48hours is enough for fuel safety. * (1MWx48hrs + 5MWx8hrs) / Week + (5MWx56hrs / Week) x 2 times In preparation for the release of radioactive materials, fullface masks with charcoal filter, Tyvek suits etc. are equipped in the control room. 22

Summary There are 14 RRs in Japan, including 6 critical assemblies, and they have been playing important roles in the various fields. New regulatory body, NRA, has devised new safety requirements for RRs (executed in Dec. 2013), and all the RRs must comply with the requirements. At present, only three research reactors, KINKI-UTR, KUR and KUCA are operating. KUR is an only operating RR as a non-zero power reactor in Japan after the Fukushima-accident. In addition to the pre-existing safety measures, new measures (a 40ton water tank, a portable fire pump, a portable power supply) were prepared. The safety re-evaluation for BDBA showed the effectiveness of those additional safety measures. 23

Thank you for your attention.