LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for CALIBRATION OF MECHANICAL SIEVE SHAKER

Similar documents
2.3. KT-3; Material Passing No. 200 (75µm) Sieve by the Wash Method

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 507 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 529 Department of Transportation July Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

May 1, 2000 LAB MANUAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY & ABSORPTION of COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO Designation T 85 (Mn/DOT Modified)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 614 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 715 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

1 Testing Equipment. Laboratory General Sampling Sample Reduction Sieve Analysis Decantation Deleterious and Chert

Tex-239-F, Asphalt Release Agent

Standard Test Procedures Manual

DETERMINATION OF WORKABILITY OF FRESH CONCRETE BY SLUMP TEST

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. TMMB Printing

Superpave Design Guidelines for Using Hot-Mix Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Recycled Asphalt Shingles

TOTAL EVAPORABLE MOISTURE CONTENT OF AGGREGATE BY DRYING FOP FOR AASHTO T 255 (11) Containers, clean, dry and capable of being sealed

8 Testing Equipment. Laboratory General Sampling Sample Reduction Sieve Analysis Decantation Deleterious and Chert

METHOD OF MAKING AND CURING CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS IN THE FIELD FOP FOR AASHTO T 23

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

METHOD OF TEST FOR FREEZING-AND-THAWING OF COARSE AGGREGATE

Method of Test for Determining Target Dry Density & In-place Density of Salvaged/Recycled Materials Using the Nuclear Gauge (Test Strip)

USCS Site Soil Classification For OWDP Project

Standard Practice for Molding Roller-Compacted Concrete in Cylinder Molds Using a Vibrating Hammer 1

Method of Test for Density and Air Voids of Asphalt Concrete by the Marshall Method

Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures 1

FREEZING AND THAWING TESTS OF COMPACTED SOIL-CEMENT MIXTURE

MOLDING, TESTING, AND EVALUATING ASPHALT BLACK BASE MATERIALS

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR SUPERPAVE AND STONE MASTIC ASPHALT MIXTURES

2012 Canadian Asphalt Mix Exchange Program Marshall Mix Design Instructions to Participants

SECTION 402 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEVELING

Testing of Concrete Blocks

SECTION 904 AGGREGATES

Section 25 Aggregate Subbase

HCMTCB SOILS CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

The GREENBOOK 2015 Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction

Manufactured (Crushed), Limestone, Fine Aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete

Florida Method of Test for NONREPETITIVE STATIC PLATE LOAD TEST OF SOILS AND FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT COMPONENTS

Mix Design and Pumped Concrete

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION. SPECIFICATION NO. TxDOT * REVISED: MAY 2005 SIEVES, TEST, BRASS SEAMLESS

Mr. Jody Wall Carolina Stalite P.O. Box 186 Phone: (704)

The Work under this Section consists of performing all operations necessary to complete construction of the leveling course on the prepared subbase.

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. Endorsed by and Affiliated with. TMMB Printing

SPECIFICATIONS FOR SAND SEAL

APPENDIX D ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS/PROBLEMS

CROP PROCESSING ENGINEERING Cleaning and Sorting

ITEM D-701 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS

Enhance the Performance of Permeability of Fine Sand Using Ceramic Tiles Waste and Plastic Waste as Admixture

Sampling of Aggregates

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

Chapter 1. Department Specifications for Bituminous Mixing Plants for Hot-Mixed, Hot-Laid Paving Mixtures

CITY OF FARGO SPECIFICATIONS AGGREGATE BASES

Standard Test Methods for Determining Consistency and Density of Roller-Compacted Concrete Using a Vibrating Table 1

ITEM P-631 REFINED COAL TAR EMULSION WITH ADDITIVES, SLURRY SEAL SURFACE TREATMENT

2015 CORNELL SOIL HEALTH TRAIN-THE-TRAINER WORKSHOP AUGUST 5-8, 2015 ITHACA, NY. Wet Aggregate Stability Test

ITEM 302 AGGREGATES FOR SURFACE TREATMENTS

Laboratory 2 Hydrometer Analysis Atterberg Limits Sand Equivalent Test

The entire document shall be read and understood before proceeding with a test. ISTA 3B Page 1 of 35

ISO/TC 238. Secretariat: SIS Solid biofuels Determination of particle size distribution for uncompressed fuels

Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head) 1

Extraction and Sieve Analysis ( µm minus) Forming Marshall Specimens, Field Method

High RAP Asphalt Mixes and Asphalt Mixes with Shingles

Bituminous Percent Within Tolerance (PWT)

Tolerances- Section

LAMPIRAN A PEMERIKSAAN AGREGAT HALUS. Universitas Sumatera Utara

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE UNIT PAVEMENT

BAYFILTER SPECIFICATIONS

Erect the weighing bins and hoppers on firm foundations to avoid settlement, which might affect the accuracy of the equipment.

Asphalt Rubber Chip Sealing DRAFT MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION. March 22, 2007

Item P-629 Thermoplastic Coal Tar Emulsion Surface Treatments Micro-Surface Type A

Mix Proportion Design of Asphalt Concrete

OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURE 2B

Construction Specification for Concrete Unit Pavers

SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION HIGH PERFORMANCE CHIP SEAL

SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION WITH CALCIUM CHLORIDE

10,000. Peak Connection Strength, lb/ft 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

TESTS FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE JOINT SEALERS PART I FLOW TEST FOR CLASS 4 JOINT SEALANT. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-525-C 1.

SECTION RIPRAP, BOULDERS, AND BEDDING

Study of the Compressive Strength of Concrete with Various Proportions of Steel Mill Scale as Fine Aggregate

EFFECT OF 19MM AS AGGREGATE S MAXIMUM SIZE TO MARSHALL PROPERTIES OF ASPHALT CONCRETE

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING LABORATORY

ADDENDUM No. 6. ITB No. 4424: W.R. Wheeler (Swift Run) Service Center PUD Non-motorized Improvements Phase 1

Concrete Batch Plant Operator Study Guide

LS 2519 CONCRETE PAVER PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method

DIVISION 9 FINISHES Section Floor Finishes

County of Park PARK COUNTY WYOMING PRIVATE SOURCE GRAVEL POWELL AREA PRODUCE TO STOCKPILE REQUEST FOR QUOTE

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Harrisburg, PA

DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL FIELD PERMEABILITY AND PAVEMENT DENSITY VALUES FOR COARSE-GRADED SUPERPAVE PAVEMENTS

A H M 531 The Civil Engineering Center

INDOT/ACPA Technical Committee 2009 Specification Revisions 2009 Test Method Revisions Studies

Properties of Concrete Incorporating Recycled Post-Consumer Environmental Wastes

Naturally Entraining Solid Particle Injector

Design, Testing and Utilization of Welded-Wire Rack Decking

Chapter 7. Sand Castle Tests 3

-vs- Figure 4.1. Comparison of the residual asphalt content of different binders.

RESILIENT MODULUS TESTING OF OPEN GRADED DRAINAGE LAYER AGGREGATES FOR INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS

CHAPTER 5 BLENDING AGGREGATES

MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS Section ST. ASTIER LIME PLASTER (NHL) PLASTER ON CONCRETE

2 ADAPTER MOUNTING & APPLICATION

OPTIMIZED 3/4" GRADATION LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE REPORT

Caffeine 100 mg, Scopolamine Hydrobromide 0.5 mg Oral Rapid-Dissolve Tablets (Solid Suspension, 96 x 750 mg [0.93 ml] Tablets)

Task 1 For Task 1, the outlet was set as a zero-gauge pressure outlet, which is the same outlet condition as the five smaller pipes.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation Harrisburg, PA

Transcription:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 608 Department of Transportation 7 Pages 1. SCOPE LABORATORY TESTING SECTION Method of Test for CALIBRATION OF MECHANICAL SIEVE SHAKER 1.1 This method of calibration describes a procedure to be used in determining the shaking efficiency of a mechanical sieve shaker. 2. APPARATUS 2.1 Balance- The balance or scale shall conform to the following criteria: Readability and Class Sensitivity Accuracy a G2 0.1 g 0.2 g or 0.1% G5 1 2 g or 0.1% G20 5 g 5 g or 0.1% G100 20 g 20 g or 0.1% a Accuracy equal to the mass stated or 0.1% of the test load, whichever is greater, throughout the range of use. NOTE 1- The balance shall have sufficient capacity to handle the greatest weighing made in conducting the test. 2.2 Sieves- The sieves shall be mounted on substantial frames constructed in a manner that will prevent loss of material during sieving. The sieves shall conform to the requirements of AASHTO M-92. 2.3 Mechanical Sieve Shaker- A mechanical sieve shaker shall impart a vertical, or lateral and vertical motion to the sieve, causing the particles to bounce and turn so as to present different orientations to the sieving surface. 2.4 Timers- Electric or mechanical timers shall be accurate and variable in 1 minute increments. The timers shall have a capacity of at least 15 minutes. 2.5 Oven- The oven shall be capable of maintaining a uniform temperature of 110 ± 5ºC (230 ± 9 ºF).

NOTE 2- Hot plates may be used when test results must be obtained quickly. Confirmation samples shall be tested using ovens as described above. 3. SAMPLES PTM No. 608 Page 2 3.1 A representative sample sufficient to yield not less than the appropriate mass of dry material, as shown below, shall be selected in accordance with AASHTO T-248. The selection of samples of an exact pre-determined mass shall not be attempted. 3.2 After drying, sample fractions of fine aggregate shall have an approximate mass as follows: Material with a minimum of 95 percent passing the 2.36 mm (No. 8) sieve...100 g Material with a minimum of 85 percent passing the 4.75 mm (No. 4) sieve, and more than 5 percent retained on a 2.36 (No. 8) sieve 500 g NOTE 3- In no case, however, shall the fraction retained on any sieve at the completion of the sieving operation weigh more than 200 g for the usual 203.2 mm (8") diameter sieve. The amount of material retained on the critical sieve may be regulated by the introduction of a larger sieve immediately above the critical sieve or by the selection of a sample of a proper size. 3.3 After drying, samples of coarse aggregate shall have a minimum mass as follows: AASHTO Minimum Mass of Sample Number kg lb. #3 20 (44) #5 10 (22) #57 10 (22) #67 10 (22) #7 10 (22) #8 5 (11) PA No. 2A 15 (33) NOTE 4- Samples failing to meet the mass requirements of Sections 3.2 and 3.3 shall be deemed to be insufficient to produce reliable results and shall not be tested. However, the intent of this method will be satisfied for samples of aggregate larger than 50 mm (2") nominal maximum size if a smaller mass of a sample is used, provided the criterion for acceptance or rejection of the material is based on the average of the results of at least three samples. The sample size used times the number of samples averaged shall equal the minimum mass of the

Page 3 sample shown in Section 3.3. The differences in individual sample sizes shall not vary by mass by more than 20 percent from each other. 4. PROCEDURE 4.1 Coarse Aggregate 4.1.1 This procedure is to be used for each aggregate size produced. After obtaining a representative sample, shake the particular material at least one minute less than the time currently being used on the mechanical sieve shaker for a given aggregate size. 4.1.2 Weigh and record the amount retained on each individual sieve. Return the amount retained onto each one of the individual sieves where there is a significant amount of material retained. Typically, these are the middle sieves of the gradation. 4.1.3 Place the first sieve that has a significant amount of material retained on the sieve mesh into the shaking device. Shake for an additional minute. Weigh and record the amount retained on this sieve after one minute of additional mechanical shaking. Follow the same procedure for the remaining individual sieves that have been determined to have a significant amount of material retained. 4.1.4 Calculation to Determine Shaking Efficiency: P = W o - W a x 100 W t Where: P = Percentage difference of weight retained on the individual sieve W o = Original weight retained on the individual sieve W a = Weight retained on the individual sieve after additional sieving W t = Total sample weight, dry

Page 4 4.1.5 When the difference between the weights retained on each individual sieve after additional mechanical sieving and the original sieving is 0.5 %, or less, of the total oven dry sample weight, FOR ALL SIEVE SIZES, the shaking time used in Section 4.1.1 is sufficient. If any of the differences calculated are greater than 0.5 % of the total oven dry sample weight, repeat this process outlined above with a new representative sample. Increase the mechanical shaking time by one minute. Repeat the process as many times as necessary, but do not exceed 12 minutes of shaking time for any aggregate on any shaking device. If the shaking device cannot meet this requirement, replace or repair the shaking device. 4.1.6 Example of a Shaking Efficiency Determination: No. 57 Coarse Aggregate Total Dry Sample Weight = 30.00 lbs 7 Minutes of Mechanical 1 Minute of Additional Shaking, lbs. Mechanical Shaking, lbs. Sieve. 5/8 in 6.20 6.10 1/2 in. 12.10 12.00 3/8 in. 4.10 4.00 Calculation to Determine Shaking Efficiency 5/8 in. 6.20 lbs 6.10 lbs = 0.10 lbs 30.00 lbs x 100 = 0.3 % difference 1/2 in. 12.10 lbs 12.00 lbs = 0.10 lbs 30.00 lbs x 100 = 0.3 % difference 3/8 in. 4.10 lbs 4.00 lbs = 0.10 lbs 30.00 lbs x 100 = 0.3 % difference The results of this calculation to determine shaking efficiency for each of the three sieves indicate that all three sieves meet the 0.5% requirement stated in Section 4.1.5. In this example, therefore, a mechanical shaking time of 7 minutes is sufficient for this #57 coarse aggregate material on this shaking device.

Page 5 4.2 Fine Aggregate 4.2.1 This procedure is to be used for each aggregate size produced. Retain the fine aggregate after the wash test and mechanically shake for at least 1 minute less than the time currently being used on the mechanical sieve shaker for a given aggregate size. NOTE 5- Washing the sample before performing the shaking efficiency determination is not necessary for bituminous sands and Type 1, 1A, 2, 3, 3A, and 4 anti-skids. 4.2.2 Weigh and record the amount retained on each individual sieve. Return the amount retained onto each one of the individual sieves where there is a significant amount of material retained. Typically, these are the middle sieves of the gradation. 4.2.3 Hand sieve each individual sieve size in accordance with AASHTO T-27, Section 8.4 stated as follows: Hold the individual sieve, provided with a snug-fitting pan and cover, in a slightly inclined position in one hand. Strike the side of the sieve sharply and with an upward motion against the heel of the other hand at a rate of about 150 times per minute, turning the sieve about one-sixth of a revolution at intervals of about 25 strokes. Weigh and record the amount retained on each individual sieve after one minute of additional hand shaking. 4.2.4 Calculation to Determine Shaking Efficiency: P = W o - W a x 100 W t Where: P = Percentage difference of weight retained on the individual sieve W o = Original weight retained on the individual sieve W a = Weight retained on the individual sieve after additional sieving W t = Total sample weight, dry

Page 6 4.2.5 When the difference between the weight retained on each individual sieve after additional hand sieving and the original sieving is 0.5 %, or less, of the total oven dry sample weight, FOR ALL SIEVE SIZES, the shaking time used in Section 4.2.1 is sufficient. If any of the sieves have differences calculated that are greater than 0.5 % of the total oven dry sample weight, repeat this process outlined above with a new representative sample. Increase the mechanical shaking time by one minute. Repeat the process as many times as necessary, but do not exceed 12 minutes of shaking time for any aggregate on any shaking device. If the shaking device cannot meet this requirement, replace or repair the shaking device. 4.2.6 Example of a Shaking Efficiency Determination: Type A Concrete Sand Total dry sample weight = 490.0 grams Sieve 7 Minutes of Mechanical 1 Minute of Additional Shaking, lbs. Mechanical Shaking, lbs. No. 8 120.0 115.0 No. 16 140.0 138.0 No. 30 100.0 98.0 Calculation to Determine Shaking Efficiency No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 120.0 g 115.0 g = 5.0 g 490 g x 100 = 1.0 % difference 140.0 g 138.0 g = 2.0 g 490 g x 100 = 0.4 % difference 100.0 g 98.0 g = 2.0 g 490 g x 100 = 0.4 % difference Although the No. 16 and the No. 30 sieves met the requirement of 0.5 % for this material, the No. 8 sieve did not. Therefore, increase the shaking time for this material to 8 minutes and repeat the process with another new representative sample. 5. REFERENCES PTM 616 AASHTO T- 27

This page left intentionally blank PTM No. 608 Page 7