QUALITY CONTROL Prepared: V. van Gastel / team TenneT Reviewed: M. Müller Approved: F. Wester BACKGROUND MATERIAL...

Similar documents
DECISION 1 SCOPE AND CONSIDERATIONS... 2

Realizing the Far and Large Offshore Wind Innovation Program (FLOW) Presentation at conference

Cost Reduction Potentials of Offshore Wind Power in Germany: comparison with Offshore Wind Cost Reduction Pathways Study

Subsidies Dutch offshore wind parks How low can you go? Energy Law Group 22 September 2017, Warsaw

Cluster Design Toolbox. Cluster Design Workshop, 15/04/2016

PES ESSENTIAL. PES: Europe

Having regard to Section 14(2), Section 23(1), (3) and (4) and Section 24(3) of the Offshore Wind Energy Act (Wet windenergie op zee);

The Future of the Ocean Economy - Offshore Wind

Development of renewable energy markets in the Netherland

Electrical Networks and Integration of Wind Energy

Changing the Scale of Offshore Wind: Examining Mega-Projects in the United Kingdom

New York State Offshore Wind Master Plan. October 20, 2017

Renewable Energy in The Netherlands June 2017

Rare Metals & Renewables

ober Oct 10 y uesdat

Bringing Sustainable Efficiency to Wind Power. Our solutions for wind farm & wind turbine January 2011

The Past, Present and Future of Wind Supply Chains

16/17. TenneT Today. Transporting electricity and powering society. Connecting across borders

The Offshore Way. WIPOS Wind power offshore substation. Answers for energy.

Inveraray to Crossaig Overhead Line Reinforcement

Wind Accelerator. energy through targeted R&D. 21 January 2011

Headline Germany - Experiences with implementing RES E auctions

Wind energy is more reliable than ever with a new Ethernet network from Siemens

Panel #2 - Wind logistics: Onshore towards offshore 2 nd Annual DHL Global Wind Conference

Windfarm Slufter II. The Netherlands

Wind Commissioning Guidance

Energy Island. Opportunities and Social Feasibility. 2 December Frits Verheij, Wouter de Boer, Arie Mol, Albert Quist

Grid Connection and Remote Control for the Horns Rev 150 MW Offshore Wind Farm in Denmark

Climate Change: The spotlight on renewables. Renewable Energy Development

Fred. Olsen Windbase. Presenter: David Matthews, Fred. Olsen Windcarrier UK General Manager Contact:

South Fork RFP LIPA Board of Trustees REV Committee Briefing. September 21, 2016

UK content analysis of Robin Rigg offshore wind farm

Review of standards on reliability for ocean energy and relation to VMEA

Fringe-of-Grid PV Projects - Normanton Solar Farm

The Role of TSO to integrate Renewables in Germany

Distribution Network Planning for Mumbai

Wind Power in Denmark. Steffen Nielsen Head of Section Danish Energy Authority Ministry of Climate and Energy

Development of Human Activities in the North Sea

Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator Driving down the cost of offshore wind. 21 May 2013 Phil de Villiers

Conditions for accelerating the deployment of offshore wind power in the BSR - Seminar 27 April 2012, Wind Power in the Nordic and Baltic Region

Flexibility for Variable Renewable Energy Integration in the Nordic Energy System

International Workshop on Wind Energy Development Cairo, Egypt March, 2010

European Offshore Wind Overview. February C Offshore - OrbisEnergy Centre, Lowestoft, NR32 1XH T: +44 (0) E:

Advanced Control Strategies to Integrate German Offshore Wind Potential into Electrical Energy Supply

Offshore Wind Accelerator

Medium Voltage UPS Solutions - When and Why? Frank Herbener, Piller Group GmbH, Germany

EDF and Integration of Distributed Energy Resources

Wind Energy Services. Ingeteam Inc.

2 COWI expertise. Spudcan analysis for jack-up Power systems and SCADA Risk analyses. COWI - quality - schedule - cost. Worldwide experience

Gas-insulated medium-voltage switchgear. for wind parks. Answers for energy.

Execution according to plan More to come. Markus Tacke, CEO Wind Power and Renewables Capital Market Day Energy and Oil & Gas Houston, June 29, 2016

Life Cycle Assessment of the wind farm alpha ventus

New power bridges between Germany and Scandinavia

BANKABILITY OF SOLAR PROJECTS HOW TO MAKE YOUR PV PROJECT BANKABLE? HOW TO SELECT EPC CONTRATCOR? ROLE OF TECHNLOGY SELECTION

Offshore Windpark Egmond aan Zee

Vision for The Future

An Analysis of Offshore Grid Connection at Kriegers Flak in the Baltic Sea

Innovation Paths in Wind Power: Insights from Denmark and Germany

A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layouts and Electric Infrastructures

Knowledge to Power. Wave & Tidal Energy

Open Networks Project

RENÉ PETERS TNO ENERGY

RENEWABLE AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

SUMMARY RUS PLAN 2017 (REINVESTMENT, EXPANSION, RESTORATION) (RUS17)

Let s share a vision Schneider Electric - Industry Levente Balasa 14/10/2010 2

Ecological Implications of Large-Scale Wind Energy Development on The North Sea International Architecture Biennale Rotterdam, June 8 th 2016

Flexible integrated transformer SOLUTION

TIDAL AND MARINE ENERGY IN THE UK IDENTIFYING THE FUTURE CHALLENGES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

Additional CSR data 2015 CSR data linked to Integrated Annual Report 2015

Costs and Benefits of the Smart Grid. Hans de Heer 10 October 2012

Grid Connection and Power Quality Optimization of Wind Power Plants

GB regulatory approach RIIO price controls and distributed generation

Anguilla Electricity Company Limited. Request for Proposal. Battery System. Anguilla Electricity Company Limited P.O. Box 400 The Valley Anguilla

Floating Wind Power in Deep Water Competitive with Shallow-water Wind Farms?

Galileo Research. Distributed Generation

ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE WITH STATIC VAR COMPENSATOR PLANNING AND OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE

NOWIcob A tool for reducing the maintenance costs of offshore wind farms

1 Workshop on Power System Testing

ENERGY FOR OCEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

Peak Time Demand Management Using Distributed Solar Inverters

DISTRIBUTION LOSS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ESB SUBMISSION THE COMMISSION FOR ELECTRICITY REGULATION

Versnellen van de energietransitie: kostbaar of kansrijk? Een gedachten-experiment voor Nederland. Springtij September 2017

Offshore Wind Energy in the Netherlands

Strategic Research Agenda Market Deployment Strategy From 2008 to 2030

Hà Nội, ngày 09 tháng 10 năm 2009

Grid Code Compliance. For India S.Balasubramoniam, Senior Consultant. 08 September September 2017 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

mv & hv switchgears Installation Servicing Testing Commissioning

GROUNDING DESIGN FOR PERSONAL SAFETY OF A LARGE SCALE WIND POWER PLANT

A Proper Design of Wind Turbine Grounding Systems under Lightning

Renewable energies. Wind energy solutions. Reliable innovation. Personal solutions.

SOLAR ENERGY Recent growth and future prospects South Africa s Electricity Supply Conference

Eastern Wind Integration and

High Voltage Direct Current

Reliable networks today and tomorrow. Network Consulting. Answers for energy.

Gas-insulated medium-voltage switchgear. for marine and offshore applications. Answers for energy.

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8

The Effect of Pitch System Reliability on Wind Power Generation s Levelized Cost of Energy

Protection Settings: Calculating, Administering and Testing ADMO at Energinet.dk

Slide 1. ABB August 23, 2016

From KEMA to DNV GL Energy

Transcription:

POSITION PAPER STAKE HOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS OFFSHORE GRID NL Type: Position paper Work stream Technical Topic: T.1 Voltage level Filename ONL15-058-T1_Voltage level_pp_v1 Version 1 - release for Expert Meeting of 18.03.2015 Pages 7 QUALITY CONTROL Prepared: V. van Gastel / team TenneT Reviewed: M. Müller 04.03.2015 Approved: F. Wester 05.03.2015 Release Public Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND MATERIAL... 2 2. SCOPE AND CONSIDERATIONS... 2 General... 2 Technical... 3 Implementation... 3 Cost, uncertainties and risk... 3 Affected topics... 4 3. POSITION TENNET... 4 4. IMPACT ON COST... 5 5. TOPIC CONSULTATION... 7

PAGE 2 of 7 1. Background material Literature used: DNV GL 66 kv whitepaper: 113799-UKBR-R-02-20150305 66 kv offshore wind International Conference 24-25 November 2014, Bremen, Germany 2. Scope and considerations The figure below shows a schematic cross-section of the connection of an offshore wind farm to the onshore electricity grid. Wind turbines are connected through medium voltage inter-array cables (in orange) to an offshore substation, from which electricity is transported to shore. TenneT will be responsible for the offshore grid, from the onshore substation up to and including, the offshore substation. TenneT intends to standardise the offshore substations - and hence the medium voltage level - for all five wind areas to be realised in the coming years in line with the Energy Agreement. Schematic of the offshore electrical grid. Source: TenneT General The Energy Agreement requires a 40% cost reduction for offshore wind to be realised over the period 2014-2024. Realisation of this cost reduction is expected to require a combination of measures 1, including - but not limited to standardisation of the offshore electrical infrastructure and larger capacity wind turbines within larger wind farms. TenneT contributes to this overall cost reduction target, through a strategic long term vision on the development of the offshore grid. Cost reduction is realised by standardisation of all 5 offshore platforms to be realised for the development of 3450 MW offshore wind, by serving concentrated large wind areas with a single platform and use of technology that is ready for future large capacity wind turbines. 1 http://tki-windopzee.nl/files/2015-01/20141124_tki_roadmap.2015-2020_ezu_f%20(1).pdf

PAGE 3 of 7 Technical Currently, 33 kv is the standard voltage level used for connecting offshore wind turbines to an offshore substation. It is a proven technology implemented in most wind farms realised today. The amount of carrying capacity of array cables is directly linked to its voltage level. With wind turbine capacity and total wind farm size increasing, the market is increasingly looking into higher voltage levels of inter-array cables, focussing mainly on 66 kv. Higher voltage levels increases the number of wind turbines that can be connected to a single inter-array cable, and consequently decreases the number of strings used and therefore the number of J-tubes required at the offshore substation. According to the Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA) the benefit of moving to 66kV is a LCOE reduction of 1.5%. 66 kv cables are expected to enter the market from 2016, and OWA has launched an engagement program with the cable suppliers to speed up testing and certification. It has been identified that manufacturing capabilities could be limited under a massive take off scenario. TenneT has considered both 33 kv and 66 kv as options for the inter-array cable voltage level, being the most proven and researched technologies. Implementation The following transmission capacity is assumed for 33 kv and 66 kv infield cables: 33 kv: 35 MW of transportable power, using a 630 mm 2 copper conductor cable. 66 kv: 64 MW of transportable power, using a 630 mm 2 copper conductor cable. The table below shows the implications for the number of strings, J-tubes and length of infield cables required for two 350 MW windfarms to connect to a single 700 MW offshore substation 2. 33 kv 66 kv Minimum number of strings required 26 14 Number of J-tubes at the offshore 28 16 substation foreseen Total estimated infield cable length [km] required for two 350 MW wind farms 3 200 140 With this size of wind farm project (2 x 350 MW), wind farms cover a relatively large geographical area. Because the transmission capacity of 33 kv infield cables is limited, more km s of array-cables is required to connect the same amount of wind energy. Cost, uncertainties and risk TenneT identified the following expected impacts on cost, as well as uncertainties and risks as given in the table below. TenneT has asked DNV-GL to provide information on both the technological status and 2 See TenneT Position Paper on J-tubes 3 Internal Ecofys draft layout for Borssele Alpha.

PAGE 4 of 7 readiness of 66 kv, as well as on current and future cost impacts. Impact on cost Reduces: required infield cable length cable installation work amount of J-tubes structural work offshore works electrical losses Increases: switch gear costs transformer costs cable supply costs per meter impact of cable failure Uncertainties / risk Cables certification Equipment optimization More limited competition between available cable suppliers Limitations in wind turbine supply Type and cost of installation ship required Health and safety regulations Affected topics The choice of inter-array cable voltage affects a number of subjects that will be discussed in later expert meetings, such as: reactive power compensation, and back-up generator capacity. 3. Position TenneT Based on the above, the external reports from DNV-GL, two expert meeting (27.11.2014 and 29.01.2015) with the sector and several bi-lateral meetings with project developers, TenneT draws the following conclusions: Implementation of 66 kv infield cable voltage is considered technically feasible, with respect to both the cables, turbines and all connecting electrical equipment. Looking forward in time, 66 kv is considered a necessity to support larger capacity wind turbines. Standardising now at 66 kv will pull the market to innovate further and facilitate reducing the costs of offshore wind energy. With increasing wind turbine capacities, the larger turbine manufacturers offer 66 kv solutions within their current wind turbine range, and more are expected to follow. 33 kv connections pose a concern for wind turbine capacities over 6 MW. 66 kv operating systems are expected to become the cheapest option available, reducing cable length, number of J-tubes, installation work and losses with increasing wind farm size to 700 MW in the Dutch offshore wind tenders. Key cable manufacturers are currently in the process of getting 66 kv cables certified, and expected to finish certification in time for realisation of the first offshore wind tender. First cables are expected to come to the market in 2015. Using 66 kv, the number of strings can be reduced from 26 (16 per 350 MW) to 14 (7 per 350 MW) at the offshore platform, with an additional 2 J-tubes for innovation or spare. This decreases installation risks and interfaces between TenneT and the developer (see also position paper of TenneT on the number of J-tubes).

PAGE 5 of 7 Standardisation of all the offshore platforms is key to TenneT's roll-out strategy and contribution to overall cost reduction. These considerations lead TenneT to the following position: TenneT is inclined towards standardising the connection voltage level of the inter-array cables to the TenneT offshore transformer platform at 66 kv for all five platforms to be realised by TenneT up to 2023. As identified above, it is recognised that a choice for standardisation of the medium voltage level at 66 kv results in a number of uncertainties for the wind farm developers. These uncertainties relate mainly to the timeline of certification of sub-sea 66kV cables, and the availability and cost of both sub-sea infield cables and wind turbines for 66 kv and the number of suppliers being able to deliver. Certification is likely to be ready in time, and there will be an ample number of suppliers of cables and turbines to result in acceptable pricing, also in the first years, due to current developments in the market. TenneT is strongly convinced that a standardisation now, results in significant cost reductions during the course of realisation of 3.5 GW of offshore wind in The Netherlands, see further quantification below. 4. Impact on cost In the table below a summary is presented of the impact - both quantitatively on cost and qualitatively - of moving from a standard 33 kv infield cable configuration to a 66 kv infield cable configuration.

POSITION PAPER Cost impact: high level breakdown Quantitative LCoE Impact Uncertainty Comment Cost element Developer Wind turbines: transformer 0.4% Low Transformer costs expected to increase 40% - 50% (2). Transformer cost consitute ~2% of WTG CAPEX (3). Wind turbines: switchgear 0.2% Medium Conservative increase in switchgear costs assumed of 50% (1). Switchgear ~1% of WTG CAPEX (3). Array cable costs 0.3% Medium Increase in cable costs [EUR/m] of 10% (1). Array cable length -1.7% Low Decrease in cable length [km] of 30% (1). Cost element TenneT Substation: Compensation Increase cost of reactive power compensation equipment of 50% (1). Compensation equipment constitute ~5% of Offshore Substation 0.1% Low equipment CAPEX (3). Substation: Connection 0.0% Switchgear worst case increase in costs assumed of 50% (2), however, since the number of required switchgear decreases, the cost Medium increase is partly offset. The net effect is expected to be minimal (3). Substation: J-tubes 0.0% Low Decrease in cost by decrease in number of J-tubes (from 28 to 16 ) (1,2,3) Impact on yield Losses -0.2% Medium Losses 33 kv 0.8%; losses 66 kv 0.55% from (1). Impact on LCoE directly related (conservatively value of -0.2% chosen) (3). Society Borssele Alpha LCoE impact -1.0% Medium Summation of the LCoE impact from separate items above (3). Impact future years -1.5% to -2.5% Medium Price for 66 kv equipment expected to decrease by 10% - 20% in the coming years (1). LCoE impact estimate (3). Qualitative LCoE Impact Uncertainty Comment Technical none Low No key technical issues expected hindering the implementation of 66 kv for offshore wind (1). Logistics Certification Market Positive Negative Negative Low Low Medium As it is possible to accommodate more power on a 66 kv circuit, quantity of array circuits entering the substation can be minimised. Fewer substations are therefore required in the 66 kv case, making a 700 MW offshore platform possible. (1) Key cable manufacturers are in the process of developing wet-design 66 kv cables and in the process of certification of these cables. Expected to be completed within 18 months under a program by the Carbon Trust (UK). (1) Amongst developers, different views exist with respect to the necessity of separate certification of turbines for the new 66 kv voltage level, as well as whether certification of Most market factor are considered as externalities (e.g. steel prices, many wind farms being realised at the same time etc.) and not included in LCoE calculations. The main market component which may have a direct impact on the cost levels for 66 kv relative to 33 kv, result from the number of suppliers that are able to deliver suitable turbines and cables. Most major turbine manufacturers are currently capable of supplying 66 kv turbines. The number of 66 kv cable suppliers may be limited to the larger companies. (3) Financers have indicated no specific risk premium will be added if similar guarantees are given by cable suppliers for 33 and 66 kv. Financial Negative Medium However, as 66 kv is a new technology, it is expected that some cost increase may result from additional uncertainties in supply and operation of new equipment. (4) References: DNV GL report (1), TenneT internal (2), Ecofys internal (3), Market feedback (4)

POSITION PAPER 5. Topic consultation The expert meeting of March 18, 2014 gives TenneT the opportunity to get feedback from developers on their position regarding array-cable voltage level. The main goal of this meeting will be to assess whether TenneT s views as documented within this position paper, and background data above, are shared by the industry.