COOL Compliance for Beef Operations Ron Lemenager, Matt Claeys, and Allen Bridges Purdue University, Department of Animal Sciences

Similar documents
TEXAS A8cM UNIVERSITY TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE

Cattle Market Outlook & Economics of Enhanced Cow-Calf Calf Traceability

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

2

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

SUPPLY VERIFIED PROCESS MANUAL

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS

ONTHLY BEEF MANAGEMENT CALENDAR & WORKBOOK

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

UNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

2014 Economic Contribution Analysis of the Washington Beef Industry

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Management Calendar for North Carolina Producers

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

WRITING A USDA PROCESS VERIFIED PROGRAM

Production Records for Cow/Calf Producers Sandy Johnson, Beef specialist Bob Weaber, Cow/calf specialist

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

1. How did it feel when someone else stepped into the hoop or your comfort zone?

Planning Your Bison Business

PB Beef Integrated Resource Management Calendar

National Animal Identification Costs and Regulations

29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale

Evaluating Preconditioning Profitability - Projection and Closeout Manual

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS. Livestock Futures and Options: Introduction to Underlying Market Fundamentals

Cattle and Beef Markets: 2016 and beyond. Kate Brooks Department of Agricultural Economics

Alabama Beef Cattle Strategic Plan

Animal Identification: What Does It Mean To The Cattle Industry?

CME Group Commodity Products. CME Group Livestock Futures and Options: Introduction to Underlying Market Fundamentals

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

2017 Beef Cattle Market Outlook

Illinois 4-H Livestock Record

Understanding SHRINK in Beef Cattle

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

U.S. ROUNDTABLE FOR SUSTAINABLE BEEF INDICATOR AND METRIC SUMMARY

Understanding Organics and the Regulations Governing this Market By Brad Rush, Briess Malt & Ingredients Company, Chilton, Wisconsin

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Cattle & Beef Outlook

Electronic Animal Identification Systems at Livestock Auction Markets

Background and Assumptions

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

PRODUCTION PLAN. Crop Production

Upper Midwest Devon Cattle Workshop & Sale

Major Determinates. of Feeder Cattle Prices at Arizona Livestock Auctions. Technical Bulletin 197

Saskatchewan Herd Size Economics June 26, th Annual WBDC Field Day. Kathy Larson WBDC Beef Economist

Iowa Farm Outlook. June 2017 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Strong Prices with Large Slaughter Suggest Firm Meat Demand

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Telephone: (706) Animal and Dairy Science Department Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science

Organic Supply Chain Ensuring organic integrity through the Organic Control System. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service National Organic Program

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Skills, Competencies and Knowledge

Marketing Practices. Beef Cattle Producers. of Arkansas. Michael P. Popp and Lucas D. Parsch ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

Cattle and Calves. Thirough Ala~bamar Auction MaLrkets. Agrcuturl. xperiment Station AUBURN UNIVERSITY BULLETIN 360 SEPTEMBER EV.

It is most definitely the

Market specifications for beef cattle

Determining the costs and revenues for dairy cattle

COMPETITIVE EDGE Cattle Marketing for the 21 st Century SARAH CHESS. B.S., John Brown University, 2004 A THESIS

Beef Cattle Outlook Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock

Introduction BEEF 140

Market Outlook for Cattle and Beef

U.S. Beef Production Practices ---

Utilizing cow-calf producer information to increase profits in retained ownership of beef cattle

Iowa Animal Identification Program

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Part 1 Johne s Disease Overview A concise summary of the latest facts about Johne s disease and recommended methods for diagnosis and control.

Checklist. KRAV s Extra Requirements for Dairy Products. For verifying KRAV s extra requirements in the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2018).

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

IRISH CATTLE BREEDING FEDERATION

3/25/2017. What to do today? Cattle & Beef Markets: Commodity Outlook

Comprehensive Feasibility Study: U.S. Beef Cattle Identification and Traceability Systems

A Method for Determining Ranch Profit Probabilities When Livestock Yields Are Normally Distributed

Chapter 101 Live Cattle Futures

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

INQUIRY Swift Beef Company, Establishment 969G Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

Georgia Beef Challenge Rules and Entry Form Ugabeef.com

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES ABERDEEN ANGUS. Management Guide. blade-farming.com

The French bovine identification and traceability system, updated with the technology of RFID. Louise MARGUIN

APPENDIX A CALIFORNIA S LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES

Beef Cattle Market Outlook

Urban Ag Academy. A Look Into Iowa s Pork Industry. Gregg Hora Iowa Pork Producer IPPA President Elect

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Guidance Document. Meeting Requirements as a Registered Food Importer. A guidance document issued by the Ministry for Primary Industries

2018 Oklahoma Youth Expo Heifer & Steer Futurity Sale and Showback

Cattle Market Outlook

Transcription:

COOL Compliance for Beef Operations Ron Lemenager, Matt Claeys, and Allen Bridges Purdue University, Department of Animal Sciences Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) will begin Sept. 30, 2008, and cattle producers must be prepared. The USDA has published an interim final rule to provide practical, yet accountable recommendations for cattle producers to assure COOL compliance. This document provides guidelines outlining the minimum requirements producers must meet and includes the type of supporting documents needed to meet those obligations. The following discussion provides suggestions to assure COOL compliance. Background Meat packers are considered the originators of the origin claim, but the USDA interim final rule indicates that the slaughter facility must possess or have legal access to records that are necessary to substantiate the origin claim. This ultimately places responsibility on beef producers to provide accurate documentation of all beef cattle produced. Beef products for retail sale from cattle born, raised, and slaughtered in the United States will be labeled as product of the United States. Beef products shall be designated as a "product of the United States and Country X" if they are imported as feeder animals from either Canada or Mexico and are fed in the United States before going to slaughter. Feeder cattle imported from either Mexico or Canada are permanently identified with a brand. However, buyers may still request a signed affidavit from the seller declaring the origin of cattle. Beef products from cattle imported for immediate slaughter from Country X will be designated as "product of Country X and the United States." Currently, cattle imported directly for slaughter are identified at entry into the United States. It appears that at least some packers plan to use the catch-all label that says Product of the U.S., Country X, and/or (as applicable) Country Y on as much beef as possible. This label will apply to beef from animals that might have been foreign-born, but were part raised and then processed in the U.S. The catch-all label can also be used on beef from cattle exclusively born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. If this catch all label is widely implemented, it will minimize added costs for everyone. However, expect to see at least some of the branded beef product lines offered to consumers through retail markets to require the product of the United States label to enhance consumer appeal and price, which means those cattle will still need documentation. As we approach the Sept. 30, 2008 deadline for mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) compliance, some cattle feeders have already received letters from packing plants asking for documentation on animals. In turn, expect feedlots to start asking for country-of-origin confirmation on animals they purchase from cow-calf and stocker/background operations to assure they stay in COOL compliance. The following guidelines outline practical methods for

documenting the origin of cattle to assist sellers if audited by the USDA or a buyer. Since the USDA has not specified a single record system to use, cow herd owners need to develop a simple, but auditable record system that will allow documentation that the calves born on their farms are "products of the U.S. USDA has stated that a producer affidavit shall be considered acceptable evidence provided it is made by someone having first-hand knowledge of the origin of the animals and identifies the animals unique to the transaction. Therefore, anytime cattle are sold, the buyer could ask the seller for an affidavit that documents the origin of the cattle. USDA goes on to indicates that typical business records are sufficient to prove origin of cattle if an audit should occur. Cattle producers with good production and financial records should feel reasonably confident providing a signed affidavit. A beef industry-wide coalition has announced the development of a standardized affidavit to declare country of origin for livestock throughout the marketing chain. This affidavit is available online at (http://www.beefusa.org/udocs/countryoforiginaffidavit453.pdf). For a list of USDA recognized records that satisfy COOL, refer to Table 1. It should be noted, however, that more than one of the identified records in this table will likely be needed for an auditor to be able to establish the origin of an animal. For example, feeding records and feed bills indicate animals have been fed, but by themselves give no indication where those animals were born or came from. General COOL Requirements for Producers: Producers must maintain auditable records at their farm or ranch regarding country of origin. Sellers self-declare the product category (country where born and raised) with a signed affidavit passed onto the buyer. Animals can be group identified if they are of the same product category. Animals of a different product category must be identified or penned separately. Recommended Producer Records Producers must maintain and have available, if audited, on-farm records that can document animal origin and movement for a given time period such as monthly, quarterly or annual inventories. These records should include: Calving records with animal IDs and dates of birth Beginning year (month, quarter, etc.) inventory Additions (births, in-shipments*, purchases*, leased*, or customer cattle*) Removals (sales, deaths, out-shipments) Ending year (month, quarter, etc.) inventory

*When animals are added to the herd from outside sources, they must have adequate documentation (signed affidavits, registration paper transfer, etc.) of origin. Typical operational and financial records that can be of some value during an audit might include: Balance sheet, income statement, other financial records Scale tickets and purchase and sales receipts Closeout records and/or feed records or bills Health papers, vaccination or other health treatment records or receipts Shipping records Operations should prepare a brief written statement of standard operating procedures (SOP) for record keeping, animal or group identification methods, or other documenting procedures that are followed as part of their normal management system. Tables 2 and 3 provide realistic examples of which records will support producer supplied affidavits and provide accountability in the event of an audit. Table 2. Examples for cow-calf and seedstock herds Goal: Provide information for an auditor to verify the origin of the animals. Minimum requirements Supporting materials Beginning and ending inventory by class, e.g., cows, bulls, bred heifers, virgin heifers, calves on cows, weaned calves, etc Individual breeding stock identification Number of calves born Number and description of incoming cattle by designation. Designate separately Number of sales or removals Record of deaths or missing cattle Pen and pasture information Additional steps: Individual identification of calves with visual or electronic tags Production records, balance sheet, vaccination and health records or bills, feed records or bills, Beef Quality Assurance certification Eartag, brand, tattoo Calving book, eartag calves Purchase receipts, scale tickets, identification system Sales receipts, scale tickets, income statement Note in production records Site map with capacities Source: The Iowa Beef Center website (http://www.iowabeefcenter.org/content/cool.htm) Table 3. Examples for feedlots, stockers, and any operation that buys cattle Goal: Upon receipt, properly identify cattle according to their product category. Minimum requirements Supporting materials Develop standard operating procedure for group or individual identification to assure separation by designation Description of eartag system, plan for noting additions to a group (tag color, notch in tag), method for handling non-us cattle

Beginning and ending inventories Production records, balance sheet, feed records Number and description of incoming cattle Purchase receipts, scale tickets, trucker with documentation of country of origin records, health papers, processing records Number of sales or removals Sales receipts, scale tickets, closeout records Record of deaths or missing cattle Note in production records Pen and pasture information Site map with capacities Additional steps: Individual identification of cattle with visual or electronic tags Do not mix cattle of different designations in the same group. Source: The Iowa Beef Center website (http://www.iowabeefcenter.org/content/cool.htm) Document Recommendations Cow-Calf Producers: All animals in the U.S. as of July 15, 2008 are considered to be U.S. origin and grandfathered into the COOL program. It is important for cow-calf producers to accurately document herd size and origin of these animals. A complete herd inventory as of July 15, 2008 would be advisable with as much animal identification information included as possible. Cows and bulls that may not be sold for several years could need this documentation to verify their status as of July 15, 2008. While not required, a cow-calf operation would be well advised to tag calves and record birth dates, tag number, and a description of the calf in a calving book. These records would be extremely valuable in an audit situation. Animals that enrolled in source-verified programs, such as the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), a Process Verified Program (PVP), or a Quality Systems Assessment (QSA) program would also meet the record requirements. In these programs, animal identification is part of a formal program and database allowing origin to be easily verified. For any calves sold, producers should keep a copy of the affidavit noting the buyer and/or the date and location of the sale. COOL also covers meat from breeding animals which means that producers should keep records of raised animals used for breeding and should request an affidavit for any purchased cows or bulls. To begin building a good foundation for verification, producers can begin with: Ear tags Calving books Herd inventories Purchase receipts of herd animals Sale bills from sold animals Stocker/Backgrounder: Backgrounding operations, like other suppliers, must maintain records to establish and identify the immediate previous source and the immediate subsequent recipient. Commingling of animals creates a challenge,

but AMS has indicated that as long as a producer has records of purchases and sales that reasonably account for total number of animal exchanged, individual animals or subsets of animals need not be traced back to specific purchase group(s). Thus, animals purchased from a variety of sources arriving with affidavits that show that animals all have the same country of origin, can be commingled into different sales groups and sold with affidavits that verify the origin of the animals. Appropriate documentation include: A declaration of origin from the seller Scale tickets with in- and out-weights Closeout records Feedlots: Cattle feeders will also need to document that cattle were "raised" in the U.S. Feedlots will need documentation on where the cattle were before entering the feedlot (place of birth and stocker operation). Feedlot operations need to start thinking about what documentation they will need from sellers and how that information will be transferred through the marketing channel (auction market, order buyer, trucker, etc.). Cattle feeders should also begin COOL discussions with their buyers to determine what information must be forwarded with the cattle when sold. Appropriate documentation includes: A declaration of origin from the seller Scale tickets with in- and out-weights Closeout records Depending on how animals flow into and out of an operation, producers may find it advantageous to use a more detailed tracking system to account for sources and destinations of cattle. If a producer has animals with different origins, those animals should be segregated by origin group with appropriate records to account for each origin group unless they are NAIS compliant or part of another individual animal ID program designed to track animals. As noted above, NAIS compliant animals may use the animal ID as verification of origin. All animals on hand as of July 15, 2008 are covered under the previously mentioned grandfather clause.