HRC T-Headed Bars Advantages for the user

Similar documents
HIGH PERFORMANCE REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS. Product Catalogue.

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE PIER COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO SEISMIS LOADING

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS

Reinforced concrete beam-column joints with lap splices under cyclic loading

New ICC/ACI Design Concept for Post-Installed Reinforcement Bars Kelly Chua, B.Eng (Civil and Structural)

CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF SLENDER R/C COLUMNS WITH INSUFFICIENT LAP SPLICE LENGTH

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS USING CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (CFRP)

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

REHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

Moment curvature analysis of concrete flexural members confined with CFRP grids

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RC COLUMNS RETROFITTED BY FRP AND SUBJECTED TO SEISMIC LOADING

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS WITH FRP SHEETS

Seismic Performance of GFRP-RC Exterior Beam-Column Joints with Lateral Beams

Reinforced Concrete Column Design

Analytical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Exterior RC Beam-Column Joints Rehabilitated with New Scheme

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

Experimental Study on Wall-Frame Connection of Confined Masonry Wall

Technical Note. High-Strength Reinforcing Bars ENGINEERING. Introduction ETN-M-8-16

Special Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls

RETROFITTING OF COLUMNS WITH RC JACKETTING AN EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOR

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

1. INTRODUCTION. Fig.1 Dimension of test specimen

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

The following excerpt are pages from the Hilti North America Post- Installed Reinforcing Bar Guide.

HILTI HY 150 REBAR DESIGN GUIDE

Deformation Capacity of RC Structural Walls without Special Boundary Element Detailing

How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam

Seismic Retrofit Of RC Columns With Inadequate Lap-Splice Length By External Post-Tensioned High-Strength Strips

EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF STRAIGHT AND HOOKED SMOOTH BARS IN EXISTING R.C. BUILDINGS

Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Bents used for Accelerated Bridge Construction. Bijan Khaleghi 1

TECH FACTS. Formulas for Success Innovative Ways to Reinforce Slabs-On-Ground

DESIGN OF GRAVITY-LOAD RESISTING FRAMES FOR SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS

CYCLIC BEHAVIOUR OF SANDWICH CONCRETE BEAM UNDER FLEXURAL LOADING

REVIEW ON SHEAR SLIP OF SHEAR KEYS IN BRIDGES

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGE FOOTINGS. David I. McLean 1

NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS

SEISMIC EFFECTS ON COUPLED SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE BY COUPLING BEAMS WITH SIDE BOLTED STEEL PLATES

Lintel Tables Design Notes and Limitations

Research Report R. E. Klingner

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

Performance based Displacement Limits for Reinforced Concrete Columns under Flexure

UHPC Connection of Precast Bridge Deck

Pile to Slab Bridge Connections

3. Bond, Anchorage and Shear This chapter will discuss the following topics:

The Art of Designing Ductile Concrete in the Past 50 Years: The Impact of the PCA Book and Mete A. Sozen, Part 2

Originally Issued: 11/24/2010 Revised: 01/20/2017 Valid Through: 11/30/ Design

INHERENT DUCTILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH NON-SEISMIC DETAILING

Fragility Curves for Seismically Retrofitted Concrete Bridges

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

SINTEF Building and Infrastructure confirms that. HRC 700 cast-in connection system

USE OF 500 GRADE STEEL IN THE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. Prof. M. Shafiul Bari, Ph.D Department of Civil Engg., BUET

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF NON- SEISMICALLY DETAILED INTERIOR RC BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION UNDER REVERSED CYCLIC LOAD

Cyclic behaviour of a full scale RC structural wall

PRELOADING EFFECT ON LOAD CAPACITY AND DUCTILITY OF RC BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH PRESTRESSED CFRP STRIPS

Various Types of Shear Connectors in Composite Structures

Bridge reinforced concrete column limit state definition

Tips For Designing Constructable Concrete Buildings

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

1 Exam Prep Placing Reinforcing Bars Tabs and Highlights

IMPROVEMENT OF THE DEFORMATION CAPACITY BY THE USE OF FIBERS

Recommendations for additional fire protection of structural elements

Section A A: Slab & Beam Elevation

CHAPTER 11: PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Reinforced Concrete under Large Seismic Action

Tests of structural walls to determine deformation contributions of interest for performance-based design

SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-DUCTILE RECTANGULAR REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS BY CFRP JACKETING

Modeling of Coupled Nonlinear Shear and Flexural Responses in Medium-Rise RC Walls

NON-LINEAR FEM ANALYSIS FOR CES SHEAR WALLS

1.7 Prestressing Steel

The Hashemite University Department of Civil Engineering. Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Dr. Hazim Dwairi 1

Evaluation of the Orientation of 90 and 180 Reinforcing Bar Hooks in Wide Members

DESIGN FOR PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE 1

Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF R.C. ELEMENTS WITH SUBSTANDARD DETAILS

Cement grouted steel bars in glulam

Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling & Simulation

Concrete-filled fiber reinforced polymer tube-footing interaction in bending

Bond between self-compacting concrete and reinforcement

THE PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE GROUND FLOOR SLAB REINFORCEMENT TO CONTROL SHRINKAGE CRACKING. D H Chisholm 1

Compression Behavior, Strength, and Ductility of Confined Concrete after Inelastic Tensile Cyclic Loading

Over the last decade, drilled and postgrouted micropile foundations have

Earthquake Design and Evaluation of Concrete Hydraulic Structures

COST C26. Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE WG 2 Session, March 30th

Fagà, Bianco, Bolognini, and Nascimbene 3rd fib International Congress

REINFORCING PRODUCT CATALOGUE MESH PRODUCT CATALOGUE MESH JAN 2013 S&T025

Non Linear Analysis of Composite Beam Slab Junction with Shear Connectors using Ansys.16

1. Cast-in-place concrete is specified in Section

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

CYCLIC TESTS OF COMPONENTS OF ONE-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME-WALL-DIAPHRAGM ASSEMBLAGE.

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS WITH 90 DEGREE END HOOKS FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT UNDER HIGH SPEED LOADING

1. INTRODUCTION. (a) Sand/ Fabric-coated (b) Sand-coated deformed. (c) Helical wrapped/ribbed Fig.1 FRP anchors with different outer surfaces

BEHAVIOR OF INFILL MASONRY WALLS STRENGTHENED WITH FRP MATERIALS

BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM WITH OPENING

Transcription:

HIGH PERFORMANCE REINFORCEMENT PRODUCTS HRC T-Headed Bars Advantages for the user HRC T-headed bars have some special characteristics which distinguish them from conventional reinforcement. HRC T-heads anchor the full actual tensile capacity of the rebar. Thus the reinforcement stays fully anchored beyond yielding up to bar break. That makes it possible to use the real stress- and strain capacity of the reinforcing steel, i.e. the ductility of the rebar. The advantages of designing with headed reinforcement are acknowledged by engineers all over the world. An increasing number of contractors are choosing headed reinforcement because of the benefits of their use, especially the increased speed of installation. 1

What are the special characteristics of a HRC T-headed bar? 1. Concentrated transfer of the full tensile capacity of the rebar. HRC 100 and 200 Series T-heads are designed to develop the tensile strength of the rebar without crushing normal strength concrete beneath the head. That makes the full capacity of the rebar available from its end. The anchorage is not dependent on bond between reinforcing steel and surrounding concrete or a crossing bar. Anchorage of the full tensile capacity of the rebar prevents premature pullout failure. 2. Stiff anchorage of the rebar minimizing slip The diagram compares the stress-strain behaviour of anchorage by a HRC T-head and anchorage by bend under repeated loading and unloading between 6% and 90% R eh. The T-head anchors the rebar much stiffer than a bend. (Source: test report STF65 F86083; T-Headed Bars, SP1: Static Pullout Tests SINTEF Norway, 1986) Stiff anchorage does not mean stiffer reinforcement. The stiff anchorage by HRC T-heads reduces slip to a minimum, enabling the ductility of the reinforcing steel to be developed. Stiff anchorage of transverse reinforcement has a positive effect on the shear capacity (see page 3) and confinement (see page 5). 2

The special characteristics result in advantages both in design and practical use Space saving anchorage (no development length, no hooks or bends) Safe anchorage, regardless of the bar diameter Safe anchorage even under loss of concrete cover Independent of bond between rebar and surrounding concrete, thus possible to use plain high-strength steel and beneficial in concrete with low bond properties (as lightweight aggregate concrete) Increased shear capacity Increased ductility of the construction When using T-headed bars there is no danger of spalling of the concrete cover by straightening bends. In cases of lost cover the T-head can still develop the full tensile strength of the rebar. If bond is degraded in addition to spalling of the concrete cover (ex: plastic cyclic loading), the advantages of HRC T-heads can make a fundamental difference to the overall structural integrity. T-heads give a stiff anchorage to the rebar. Stiff anchorage of shear reinforcement leads to: decreased crack width increased friction in the cracks (aggregate interlock) increased concrete contribution to shear capacity (acknowledged among others by the Canadian Standard CAN/CSA-A23.3-04 Design of concrete structures and ACI 421.1.R-99 Shear reinforcement for slabs ) 3

Increased ductility of a reinforced concrete structure by using T-headed bars Why ductility? In the design of any structure the following types of loads have to be considered: - likely loads (dead loads, live loads) - unlikely loads (extreme environmental loads, accidents) - failure of a local structural part (e.g. a column or a wall panel) Often is it unpractical or even impossible to design a structure to behave in the elastic state under extreme loads (which magnitude might be unknown). The solution in such cases is to give the structure sufficient ductility. Ductility is then a criterion of resistance equivalent to strength. Ductility is the ability to displace inelastically without significant loss of strength or stiffness. In other words: a ductile structure is capable to sustain a certain level of deformation without failure. Thus the structure exposed to extreme loads or events can absorb energy without collapse and even might be reparable without weakening the load capacity or disabling its function. How to make a structure more ductile with help of T-headed bars? Reinforced concrete Compression Tension Ductility: Confinement of Prevention of buckling Utilization of the ductility properties compression members of the reinforcement at of the reinforcing steel by: by stiff transverse yield stress by stiff - adequate anchorage reinforcement anchored headed cross - adequate connection see page 5 ties or links (splicing) It is very important that anchorage and rebar splice have sufficient stress - AND STRAIN capacity. see page 6 4

The effects of confinement: (1) increase in concrete strength (2) increase in compression strain (possibility of absorbing energy by plastification) (3) slower strength decrease after crushing of the concrete (ductile behaviour) Stress-strain curve for confined and unconfined concrete The stiffer the transverse reinforcement performs, the larger is the confining effect. The stiffness of the transverse reinforcement is not only depending on the amount of the steel cross section area (reinforcement ratio), but on the stiffness of the tie anchorage as well. By using T-headed bars not only is a high reinforcement ratio possible without congesting the cross section, but the head ensures a stiffer anchorage than a bend or hook as well (see page 2). Headed cross-ties in a wall of a nuclear waste containment structure 5

Utilization of the real ductility properties of the reinforcing steel Ductility of reinforcing steel is not just described in terms of strength but by deformation as well. To utilize the ductility of the reinforcing steel bars, the stress and strain capacity of rebar splices and anchorages is essential. T-heads (HRC 100 and 200 series) HRC T-heads anchor the actual tensile capacity of the rebar. That means that the reinforcement stays fully anchored beyond yielding, up to bar break. Thus it is possible to use the real stress- and strain capacity of the reinforcing steel while avoiding premature pull-out failure of the rebar. Transverse reinforcement is anchored stiff by T-heads and will add confinement to the structure. Rebar with HRC 100 series T-heads at both ends Mechanical splices (HRC 400 series) HRC 400 mechanical splices are dimensioned to exceed the actual stress- and strain capacity of the reinforcing steel. Lap splices with additional reinforcement can be avoided. HRC 400 mechanical couplers provide real continuity of the rebar even under extreme loads. The splice will not be the weak link! HRC 400 mechanical coupler 6

Improved productivity at the construction site with T-headed bars Effective construction process by efficient reinforcement: T-headed bars are easy and fast to place. In many cases fewer bars with larger diameter can be used. The absence of hooks or bends for anchorage allows often the use of straight bars. reduced construction time increased predictability of delivery reduced defects and errors reduced accidents. Common problems: Solutions with headed reinforcement: Examples for the use of T-headed reinforcement: 7

Summary: Anchorage by HRC T-Heads is Safe (HRC T-heads anchor the full actual tensile capacity of the rebar bar break ) Structural Performance (superior anchorage, improved ductility) Concrete Quality (reduce congestion of reinforcement, better pouring conditions) Possible Material saving (No hooks or bends, no development length, effective anchorage may lead to reduced member dimensions) Easy and fast to place (Increased speed of construction, better placement tolerances) For more information contact HRC: HRC Metalock Industrier AS PO box 591, N-3412 Lierstranda, Norway Tel: +(47) 32 24 04 70 Fax: +(47) 32 84 00 56 info@hrc-europe.com HRC USA: www.hrc-usa.com 8