Capability Policy. Human Resources Business Partner Version nd July Greenwich Executive Group

Similar documents
NHS Lewisham CCG Grievance Policy & Procedure

Grievance Policy and Procedure for Academic Support Staff

INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE GRIEVANCES POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Disciplinary Policy & Procedure

Individual and Collective Grievances Policy (Replacing Policy Number 073 and 108 Workforce)

Capability health procedure for academic support staff

UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Regulation pertaining to disciplinary & related procedures for academic staff

Trust-wide consultation via Share-point, and consultation via the JCNC Implementation date: May 2012

Human Resources People and Organisational Development. Disciplinary Procedure Manual Staff

RIVERSIDE SCHOOL. Capability Procedure for Support Staff

St Thomas More Catholic Primary School

Performance Improvement Policy A guide to addressing poor performance

Equality Delivery System for the NHS EDS2 Summary Report

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY DISCIPLINARY

Employee Disciplinary Procedure

UNIVERSITY OF EXETER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Date ratified June, Implementation Date August, Date of full Implementation August, Review Date Feb, Version number V02.

HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY

Grievance Procedures for Support Staff

Grievance Policy and Procedure

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Review date: July 2018 Responsible Manager: Head of Human Resources. Accessible to Students: No. Newcastle College: Group Services:

Capability Policy and Procedure for All School Based Staff. Effective from 1 September 2012 CONTENTS

Pay Protection Policy V2.0

GRIEVANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

WHITELEY PRE SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. 1.1 The disciplinary procedure applies to all members of staff, volunteers and committee members.

Grievance Policy. Version: 2.3. Status: Final. Title of originator/author: Human Resources Directorate. Name of responsible director:

Disciplinary & Grievance Policy Jan 2016

Highbury Grove School Disciplinary Procedure

Human Resources Policy Framework. Management of Attendance Policy and Procedure

Lead Employer Flexible Working Policy. Trust Policy

THE CRYPT SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE (FORMERLY THE CONDUCT PROCEDURE AND GUIDANCE)

Managing Sickness Procedure/Policy

Whole School Model Disciplinary Procedure

GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. For Coast Academies

CORPORATE REPORT Grievance policy and procedure 2015/17 FEBRUARY 2016

Grievance and Disputes Policy. Target Audience. Who Should Read This Policy. All Trust Staff

Schools Disciplinary Policy & Procedure

Grievance Policy and Procedure

Newcastle University Grievance Procedure

Grievance Policy. Policy Title Grievance Policy V1.0 Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire and Luton Clinical Commissioning Groups Page 1 of 34

Policy Number G9 Effective Date: 25/05/2017 Version: 1 Review Date: 25/05/2018

DRUMBEAT SCHOOL AND ASD SERVICE. Disciplinary Policy (Adopted Lewisham Model Policy)

UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Grievance and Workplace Conflict Policy

APPRAISAL (Performance Management) 2016/17. Date Agreed Body Review Date

GRIEVANCE POLICY. NHS Ayrshire and Arran Organisation & Human Resource Development Policy. Policy Reference HRP/013

DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND BULLYING AT WORK POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR STAFF

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Date of review: Policy Category:

Grievance Policy. Printed copies must not be considered the definitive version

Controlled document This document is uncontrolled when downloaded or printed. WHHT: HR014. Quality & Safety Group. Workforce Committee

MODEL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE FOR SMALL ORGANISATIONS

Employment Appeals Procedure

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Technical factsheet Disciplinary, dismissal and grievance procedures

Grievance Policy/Procedure

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

GRIEVANCE POLICY. Document Title. Grievance Policy Document Number. 2011/18 v1 Author. Karen Perry Author s Job Title. HR Business Partner Department

Grievance policy. Purpose of Agreement. Version 3 Name of Approving Committees/Groups Operational Date June 2016

Acas consultation. on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

Harassment and Bullying policy and procedure

ILL HEALTH CAPABILITY (Ordinance Policy)

SCHOOL GRIEVANCE POLICY EVENLODE PRIMARY SCHOOL

ALL WALES GRIEVANCE POLICY

Human Resources. Disciplinary procedures Teaching and support staff

OCL Staff Discipline Policy Version MN. Staff Discipline Policy

School Disciplinary Procedure

Butterknowle Primary School. Disciplinary Policy

Discipline Policy and Procedure. Adopted by the Trust Board on 6 December 2016

SOLIHULL METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

HARASSMENT AND BULLYING POLICY

Disciplinary procedure. 1. Introduction

FIXED TERM CONTRACT POLICY. Recruitment and Selection Policy Secondment Policy. Employment Policy. Officer / CSP

Ealing Schools. Medical Capability Procedure

GRIEVANCE AND DISPUTES POLICY

WITH EFFECT FROM 1 JANUARY Many difficulties that arise can be resolved quickly and informally between managers and their staff.

Organisational and Workforce Change Procedure PROCEDURE DOCUMENT

RESOURCES DIRECTORATE Director Dave Burbage. Isle of Wight Council REDEPLOYMENT POLICY. January Redeployment Policy INTERNAL USE ONLY - POLICY

The University of Bolton. Staff Disciplinary Procedure

Redeployment Policy and Procedure

Staff Grievance Policy V1.0

Barnies Day Nurseries and Out of School Clubs Grievance and Disciplinary Policy and Procedures

DISMISSAL PROCEDURES

GUIDANCE REGARDING CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIONS FOR SCHOOL BASED STAFF

PRINCES RISBOROUGH TOWN COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY POLICY & PROCEDURE

Performance Management Framework

Flexible Working Arrangements Policy

Incremental Pay Progression Policy and Procedure

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Employment Policies & Procedures

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE. 1 Aims and Objectives

DISCIPLINARY POLICY FOR SCHOOL BASED STAFF

3. Staff Disciplinary & Grievance Procedures

Staff Disciplinary Policy and Procedure July 2014

GUIDANCE ON THE CAPABILITY PROCEDURE FOR SCHOOL BASED STAFF

Allensbank Primary School

Policy for Pay Progression Using Gateways

Grievance Procedure. Version: 3. All Southern Health Staff.

Grievance Policy. Approved by governors. Chair Of Governors

Transcription:

Capability Policy Author(s) Human Resources Business Partner Version 0.1 Version Date 2 nd May 2014 Implementation/Approval Date 2 nd July 2014 Review Date July 2017 Review Body Greenwich Executive Group Policy Reference Number #036 1

Version Author Date Reason for review 0.1 Carol Yorrick May 2014 Update in accordance with the establishment of the CCG Capability Policy 0.1 Page 2 of 20

Contents Page 1.0 Introduction... 4 2.0 Principles... 5 3.0 When should Capability or Disciplinary Policy be used?... 6 4.0 Managing Performance General Guidelines... 6 5.0 Informal Approach... 7 6.0 Formal Approach - Rights Of The Employee... 8 7.0 Formal Procedure... 9 8.0 First Formal Review Stage... 9 9.0 Final Formal Review Hearing.....10 10.0 Formal Hearing - Panel Membership.....11 11.0 Appeals.........11 12.0 Review... 11 Appendix 1: Formal Hearing Procedure.....12 Appendix 2: Capability Procedure Overview... 14 Appendix 3: Record Of The Employee's Progress During a Performance Improvement Programme... 15 Appendix 4 - Equality & Equity Impact Assessment Checklist...18 Capability Policy 0.1 Page 3 of 20

1 Introduction Target Audience Brief Description (max 50 words) Action Required Governing Body members, committee members and all staff working for, or on behalf of, the CCG This policy sets out the principles by which the CCG will: Ensure that where an employee s work performance is unsatisfactory, they are treated fairly, with sensitivity, understanding and in a professional manner throughout the process. Give the employee the opportunity to improve their work performance to an acceptable standard, by providing a means for her/him to be advised formally of the effects and potential consequences on their employment should there be no significant improvement in her/his performance. Following approval at the Greenwich Executive Group, The Chief Officer will ensure that the requirements of this policy will be raised at all team meetings, and confirm the requirements with the chairs of each committee, and with CCG executives. Chairs of committees will identify the programme of review with the Accountable Executive for each policy within their committee remit. Accountable Executives will identify policy owners for each policy within their remit. The Executive Manager will establish and maintain a corporate register of all policies and their status, and will ensure that these are appropriately reflected on the website. Glossary Term Accountable Executive Policy Owner Definition CCG Executive accountable for development, implementation and review of the policy Post holder responsible for the development, implementation and review of the policy 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Greenwich CCG aims to recruit and retain well-qualified and skilled employees in order to deliver the best service possible to our service users. The CCG also recognises its responsibility to ensure that employees are aware of the performance standards required in employment. 1.1.2 Whilst the CCG has rigorous recruitment and performance management appraisal systems, it also recognises that there may be Capability Policy 0.1 Page 4 of 20

occasions when employees are not able to perform at the expected standard for the job. In poor performance cases where the reason is not within the control of the employee, e.g. due to lack of ability, inadequate training or lack of experience, this will be dealt with under the CCG s Capability Procedure (Appendix 2). 1.1.3 These issues can usually be dealt with through the normal supervision and Appraisal processes. However, the CCG also recognises that there will be occasions when, despite such support and training, no improvement takes place. This procedure outlines the process to be used in such circumstances. 1.2 Policy Statement 1.2.1 This policy is intended to complement the CCG s performance management appraisal systems, Sickness Absence Policy and Disciplinary Policy as part of the CCG s performance management strategy. 1.2.2 To give the employee the opportunity to improve their work performance to an acceptable standard, by providing a means for her/him to be advised formally of the effects and potential consequences on their employment should there be no significant improvement in her/his performance. 1.3 Scope 1.3.1 This policy applies to all staff of the CCG and sets out how Greenwich CCG will manage capability issues. 1.3.2 Appendix 2 gives an Overview of the Capability procedure with the informal and formal stages clearly set out. 1.3.3 Appendix 3 provides a model template to record an employee s progress during a Performance Improvement programme. Introduction and Objectives 2 Principles 2.1 Line Managers have the responsibility to clearly articulate to employees the performance standards expected of them in the conduct of their duties. 2.2 All employees have a responsibility to achieve a satisfactory level of performance and to carry out their duties to the standards required by the organisation. 2.3 The CCG is committed as an employer to doing its best to ensure that all staff are adequately equipped with the skills and knowledge necessary for the performance of their roles and responsibilities. 2.4 All actions taken in line with this Capability Procedure will be applied to all staff equitably and in accordance with the provisions of the CCG s Equal Opportunities and Bullying and Harassment Policies. 2.5 The employee will have full access to a copy of the Capability Procedure at both the informal and the formal stage. 2.6 Line Managers should discuss with and receive advice from a member of HR at all stages of the formal procedure. They will discuss the case and a member of HR will attend all formal meetings. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 5 of 20

3 When should Capability or Disciplinary Policy be used? When dealing with issues of poor performance and sub-standard work, managers need to recognise that a distinction can often be made between negligence, a lack of ability and ill health or disability. There are firm guidelines in both the Disciplinary & Capability policies to enable Managers to clearly distinguish between Standards of Behaviour and Conduct and Negligence on the one hand and Poor Performance and Sub Standard work on the other and so identify the right policy and follow the appropriate course of action/sanction. a) Disciplinary procedures will be considered when an employee s standard of work, conduct or behaviour is unsatisfactory. b) In poor performance cases where the reason is not within the control of the employee, e.g. due to lack of ability, inadequate training or lack of experience, this will be dealt with under the CCG s Capability Procedure. c) In case of sickness absence, either repeated episodes of short term absence or long term sickness absence, the CCG s Sickness Absence Management procedure should be used. 4 Managing Performance General Guidelines 4.1 Managers should provide a comprehensive local induction programme for all new members of their area or service. This will ensure that the employee fully understands what is expected of her/him and will help to structure their expectations of the job. 4.2 The employee should receive appropriate levels of support to do their job. On-going support and direction may be delivered in a number of ways, including formal personal development meetings and formal or informal supervision and feedback. 4.3 Development, training, supervision and encouragement are essential factors if employees are to achieve a satisfactory level of performance. Steps should be taken to ensure that unsatisfactory performance is identified as soon as possible and remedial action taken on either an informal or formal basis. Most performance issues should be dealt with on an on-going basis and without recourse to this policy. 4.4 When dealing with problems of poor performance and sub-standard work, managers need to recognise that a distinction can often be made between negligence, a lack of ability and ill-health or disability. 4.5 Negligence usually involves a measure of personal accountability for failing to maintain a "duty of care" for which some form of disciplinary action, in accordance with Greenwich CCG s Disciplinary Policy (available on the intranet or internal shared drive), may be appropriate. 4.6 Poor performance issues to be dealt with under the CCG s Capability Policy will include cases where the reason is due to lack of ability, inadequate training or lack of experience. 4.7 If the performance problem is as a result of ill-health or disability, then Greenwich CCG s Sickness Absence Management Policy (available on Capability Policy 0.1 Page 6 of 20

5 Informal Approach the intranet or internal shared drive) should be referred to. Managers should be aware that Disability Discrimination legislation may be applicable in such circumstances and reasonable adjustments may be required. 5.1 Where an employee's work falls below the required standard, the first stage in addressing identified unsatisfactory performance is to try to resolve the problem with the employee informally as follows: 5.1.1 The nature of the problem and evidence to support this should be brought to the employee's attention and the reasons explored. The employee will be given an opportunity to explain the unsatisfactory performance and the reasons should be looked into, where applicable. 5. 1.2 An action plan to address the unsatisfactory performance will be jointly developed and agreed with the employee (Appendix 3). 5. 1.3 Where the reason for the unsatisfactory performance is identified as being due to a lack of required skills, the employee should be assisted through training, on the job coaching and supervision, and given a reasonable timescale in which to reach the required standard of performance. The employee should be made aware that they must demonstrate a commitment to achieve the standards required. 5. 1.4 If the reason for the unsatisfactory performance is identified as being due to other factors such as inadequate resources, poor working conditions, harassment and bullying, health-related issues or domestic circumstances, the appropriate intervention to deal with the situation should be made in line with the relevant CCG policy. Once the situation is addressed and unsatisfactory performance is still occurring, an action plan to address this within a reasonable timescale should be developed and agreed jointly with the employee. 5. 1.5 The employee will be advised of the possible consequences of failing to improve her/his performance to the required standards. A summary of the meeting and the agreed action plan will be confirmed in writing by the manager. 5. 1.6 A review meeting between the manager and the employee will be held at the end of the agreed timescale to assess the level of improvement. If satisfactory improvement has been achieved and is sustained from then on, no further action will be taken. Regular performance monitoring will continue as part of the normal appraisal process. 5. 1.7 However, where there has been no satisfactory improvement, the time period may be extended or the employee will be informed that formal capability proceedings are to be initiated. This will be confirmed in writing. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 7 of 20

5. 1.8 The employee will not normally require representation at the informal stage unless there is a dispute, but is free to consult with her/his trade union representative or work colleague, if needed. 5.2 Raising a Grievance Prior to a Capability Hearing A grievance cannot be lodged in relation to issues being taken forward under this Capability procedure. Those issues should be raised as part of the capability process. Where a separate grievance process could impact upon allegations being taken forward under the capability process, the grievance investigation may be considered by the chair of the Capability Hearing before a decision on the disciplinary allegations is made. Any appeal against the grievance decision can be heard at the same time any appeal against a sanction imposed under the Capability process. 6 Formal Approach Rights of the Employee The employee will have the following rights during the formal Capability Procedure: 6.1 The employee will be advised in writing, at least 5 working days prior to the meeting that formal capability proceedings are to be initiated. A copy of this policy will be provided. 6.2 The employee will be advised in writing of her/his right to be accompanied. Employees will be entitled to be accompanied by a work colleague or Trade Union representative, not acting in a legal capacity, during any hearings, formal meetings or appeals relating to the procedure. The colleague or Trade union representative will be allowed to confer with the employee during the meeting and to address the meeting on his/her behalf. The colleague or trade union representative however, does not have the right to answer questions on behalf of the employee. It is the employee s responsibility to arrange this representation. The trade union representative need not be an employee of the CCG, but if he/she is not a fellow worker or an employee of his/her union, the CCG may insist on him/her being certified by the union as being experienced or trained in accompanying employees at formal hearings. The choice of companion is a matter for the employee, but Greenwich CCG reserves the right to refuse to accept a companion whose presence would undermine the sickness absence management process, or where it deems the choice of companion to be unreasonable e.g. someone from a remote geographical location, when there is someone suitable and willing available at the same location. Please note that individual work colleagues are not obliged to agree to accompany employees. Companions will be given appropriate paid time off to allow them to accompany colleagues at a formal hearing. A member of Human Resources will support the Manager at all stages and during meetings with both parties. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 8 of 20

6.3 The employee will be given copies of all relevant documents and written statements. 6.4 The employee will have the opportunity of discussing her/his case personally with the manager prior to any decision being reached. 6.5 All formal decisions taken by the manager must be confirmed in writing with the employee. 7 Formal Procedure 7.1 The formal Capability Procedure will be adopted if the informal procedure fails to result in a satisfactory improvement in the employees performance. 7.2 The formal Capability procedure comprises two stages: First Formal Review Meeting Final Formal Review Hearing, which may result in redeployment, demotion or dismissal. 7.3 The stages will normally be progressive. However, in exceptional circumstances, the full capability procedure may not be appropriate. 7.4 In situations where the risk to service users, service delivery or the financial security of the CCG is considered to be significant, it will be appropriate to suspend the employee from duty or to transfer her/him temporarily to other less risky duties. 8 First Formal Review Stage 8.1 The employee will be given 5 working days notice of any meetings. 8.2 At each stage, the employee will be clearly informed of the shortfall between her/his performance and the expected standards 8.3 The employee will be given an opportunity to explain the reasons for their continued poor performance. Explanations for unsatisfactory performance not previously given will be investigated by the line manager using the appropriate CCG policy. 8.4 Consideration will be given to the effectiveness of any help and support that has been given in the past and what additional action and assistance could be given to help the employee to overcome her/his difficulties. 8.5 Commitment to reaching the required standards will be gained from the employee and the appropriate course of action and a definite timescale will be agreed. This will be recorded in the form of an Action Plan and will indicate what support the employee needs to reach their targets (e.g. additional training, written guidance, direct supervision and support from an appropriately skilled senior or experienced member of staff). 8.6 A reasonable period for the employee to reach the required standards will be set. A monitoring system will be put in place in the interim period and a formal review date will be set. The review meetings will be conducted by Capability Policy 0.1 Page 9 of 20

the line manager with the employee and their representative. A member of Human Resources will also be present. 8.7 At the end of the identified timescale the employee should be informed that either: performance is now satisfactory and no further action will be taken; or performance has improved although not sufficiently and an extension to the programme for improvement is required; or He/She has failed to improve or to display sufficient improvement, that a Second Stage Meeting is necessary and the next stage of the Performance Capability Policy be invoked. 8.8 All formal meetings should be followed up with a letter to the employee, outlining the discussion and clearly setting out the outcome of the meeting. 8.9 The process will be repeated at the end of the agreed review period and, where there is no improvement, the Final stage of the procedure will be initiated. 9 Final Formal Review Hearing 9.1 In the event that the employee s performance has not improved to the identified standard, a Formal Hearing will be convened. 9.2 Management will submit a full report of the actions taken to manage and support the capability issue to a senior manager, who will chair the formal hearing. The employee should also be provided with a copy of the manager s report and all associated documentation used to inform the report. 9.3 Copies of relevant documentation should be circulated at least 5 working days in advance. 9.4 If circumstances necessitate, either side can request one postponement of up to 5 working days or more by mutual agreement. All hearings should be held as soon as practicably possible. 9.5 The Formal Hearing will be based on the procedure outlined in Appendix 1. 9.6 The outcome of the meeting may be: a decision to take no further action the issuing of a performance management warning. This warning on file for a period of 12 months. an offer to redeploy the employee to alternative work A decision to dismiss the employee 9.7 Consideration of redeployment may be appropriate at this stage as an alternative to dismissal. However, any offer to redeploy the employee will be entirely at the CCG s discretion. Redeployment will include consideration of posts at an equal or lower band. However, refusal by an employee of an offer of suitable alternative employment will result in the termination of her/his employment. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 10 of 20

9.8 In the event that the panel recommends that redeployment is considered, a meeting will be convened within 5 working days with the employee, their line manager, a member of Human Resources and employee representative to consider suitable vacancies available in the CCG. 9.9 Where a suitable post is identified, the employee will have the right to a formal priority interview in such a situation and would need to demonstrate compliance with the essential criteria stated in the job description. No trial period will apply in these circumstances. 9.10 If the employee is not deemed suitable for redeployment to a specific post after interview the employee will have the right to receive formal feedback on the decision. 9.11 Any redeployment or demotion would not attract protection of salary. 9.12 Where no suitable vacancies are identified within this timescale then the panel will reconvene to consider the redeployment process and alternative outcomes which may include termination of the contract. Any dismissal will be with full notice or payment in lieu of notice. The decision to dismiss together with the reasons for dismissal will be set out in writing and sent to the employee. 9.13 All decisions must be confirmed in writing to the employee within 5 working days of the hearing. 9.14 There will be a right to appeal. 10 Formal Hearing - Panel Membership 11 Appeals 10.1 The case will be heard by a senior manager who has not been previously involved in the case. 10.2 The Chair will be supported by a member of Human Resources to help ensure fairness, consistency and appropriate standards of conduct. 10.3 The Line Manager will present the case and be supported by Human Resources. 10.4 The Employee will be supported by a trade union representative or a work colleague. Please see Section 6.2. 11.1 Employees are entitled to appeal against the decision reached at the First and Final Formal Hearing, respectively. 11.2 The right of appeal must be exercised by the employee within 10 working days of the receipt of the outcome letter, in writing to the Chief Officer, stating the grounds on which she/he is making the appeal. 11.3 The appeal will be handled in accordance with the Greenwich CCG s Disciplinary Appeals Procedure available on the CCG s intranet. 12 Review Unless there are changes to legislation this policy will be reviewed every three years. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 11 of 20

Appendix 1 Formal Hearing Procedure This will be carried out in accordance with the CCG s Disciplinary Procedure. 1. The manager will present the case in the presence of the employee and her/his representative and may call witnesses. 2. The employee and her/his representative will have the opportunity to ask questions of the manager and any witnesses. 3. Members of the panel will have the opportunity to ask questions of the manager and witnesses. 4. The manager will have the opportunity to re-examine her/his witnesses on any matters raised by the employee, her/his representative or members of the panel. 5. The member of staff or her/his representative will present their case in the presence of the manager and may call witnesses. 6. The manager will have the opportunity to ask questions of the employee, their representative and any witnesses. 7. Members of the panel will have the opportunity to ask questions of the employee, her/his representative and witnesses. 8. The employee or her/his representative will have the opportunity to re-examine their witnesses on any matters raised by the manager or members of the panel. The representative is not permitted to respond on behalf of the employee. 9. The manager and the employee or her/his representative will have the opportunity to sum up their cases, with the employee or her/his representative having the right to speak last. Neither party can introduce any new matters pertaining to the case at this summing up stage. 10. The manager, employee and her/his representative shall depart from the immediate panel venue. 11. The Chair, and a member of Human Resources, shall adjourn to deliberate in private on the evidence presented. Where there are points of uncertainty, they will recall both parties, irrespective of from which side clarification is required. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 12 of 20

12. Where possible, the full panel will be reconvened and the Chair will verbally deliver the decision, which will be confirmed in writing within three working days of the hearing. 13. The employee and her/his representative will be advised verbally and in writing of their rights of appeal. Capability Policy 0.1 Page 13 of 20

Appendix 2 - Capability Procedure Overview Informal Meeting with Line Manager Identify expected standards and gaps demonstrated by employee Agree an Action Plan to address the unsatisfactory performance Offer supportive mechanisms to assist with development Agree review period Discuss the possible consequences of failure to improve no improvement Informal Meeting with Line Manager o o o o o Identify expected standards and gaps demonstrated by employee Agree an Action Plan to address the unsatisfactory performance Offer supportive mechanisms to assist with development Agree review period Discuss the possible consequences of failure to improve no improvement First Formal Review with Line Manager, HR Rep and Union Rep o Review performance against objectives/ standards set in in Informal Meeting o Consider effectiveness of support given and what additional assistance can be offered no improvement Final Formal Hearing Director or nominated Deputy to Chair, o Manager to present full report of the actions taken and support offered o Employee responds o Outcomes can include - issue of perfromance management warning, redeployment or dismissal Capability Policy 0.1 Page 14 of 20

Appendix 3 - Record Of The Employee's Progress During A Performance Improvement Programme Use this model form to keep a record of the employee's progress during a performance improvement programme. Record of performance improvement Name of employee: Employee's job title: Employee's department: Employee's manager: Performance concerns: Performance concern 1 - improvement required Performance concern 2 - improvement required Performance concern 3 - improvement required Capability Policy 0.1 Page 15 of 20

Performance concern 4 - improvement required Identify specific areas where performance has improved since the last form was completed: Identify any problems that still remain and the steps being taken to address these: Summary of the extent of the employee's overall improvement: Are any changes required to the performance improvement programme? If yes, give details below: Capability Policy 0.1 Page 16 of 20

Employee's comments on the process so far and any points noted above: Employee's signature: Manager's signature: Date: Capability Policy 0.1 Page 17 of 20

Appendix 4 - Equality & Equity Impact Assessment and EDS2 Checklist This is a checklist to ensure relevant equality and equity aspects of proposals have been addressed either in the main body of the document or in a separate equality & equity impact assessment (EEIA)/ equality analysis. It is not a substitute for an EEIA which is required unless it can be shown that a proposal has no capacity to influence equality. The checklist is to enable the policy lead and the relevant committee to see whether an EEIA is required and to give assurance that the proposals will be legal, fair and equitable. The word proposal is a generic term for any policy, procedure or strategy that requires assessment. Challenge questions Yes/No What positive or negative impact do you assess there may be? 1. Does the proposal affect one group more or less favourably than another on the basis of: Race Pregnancy and Maternity Sex Gender and Gender Re-Assignment Marriage or Civil Partnership Religion or belief Sexual orientation (including lesbian, gay bisexual and transgender people) Age Disability (including learning disabilities, physical disability, sensory impairment and mental health problems) 2. Will the proposal have an impact on lifestyle? (e.g. diet and nutrition, exercise, physical activity, substance use, risk taking behaviour, education and learning) 3. Will the proposal have an impact on social environment? (e.g. social status, employment (whether paid or not), social/family support, stress, income) 4. Will the proposal have an impact on physical environment? (e.g. living conditions, working conditions, pollution or climate change, accidental injury, public safety, transmission of infectious disease) 5. Will the proposal affect access to or experience of services? (e.g. Health Care, Transport, Social Services, Housing Services, Education) By using evidence and insight to assess and grade our equality performance, NHS Greenwich can generate much of the information we will require to demonstrate compliance with the PSED. The checklist is to enable the policy lead and the relevant committee to see if a particular policy or project will provide the relevant evidence to assist NHS Greenwich CCG meet the set out EDS goals to achieve better outcomes for patients and staff. Please assess your policy, project or service against the following: Capability Policy 0.1 Page 18 of 20

The goals and outcomes of EDS2 Description of outcome Yes/ No Better health outcomes 1.1 Services are commissioned, procured, designed and delivered to meet the health needs of local communities 1.2 Individual people s health needs are assessed and met in appropriate and effective ways 1.3 Transitions from one service to another, for people on care pathways, are made smoothly with everyone well-informed 1.4 When people use NHS services their safety is prioritised and they are free from mistakes, mistreatment and abuse 1.5 Screening, vaccination and other health promotion services reach and benefit all local communities Improved patient access and experience 2.1 People, carers and communities can readily access hospital, community health or primary care services and should not be denied access on unreasonable grounds 2.2 People are informed and supported to be as involved as they wish to be in decisions about their care 2.3 People report positive experiences of the NHS 2.4 People s complaints about services are handled respectfully and efficiently A representative and supported workforce 3.1 Fair NHS recruitment and selection processes lead to a more representative workforce at all levels 3.2 The NHS is committed to equal pay for work of equal value and expects employers to use equal pay audits to help fulfil their legal obligations 3.3 Training and development opportunities are taken up and positively evaluated by all staff 3.4 When at work, staff are free from abuse, harassment, bullying and violence from any source 3.5 Flexible working options are available to all staff consistent with the needs of the service and the way people lead their lives 3.6 Staff report positive experiences of their membership of the workforce Inclusive leadership 4.1 Boards and senior leaders routinely demonstrate their commitment to promoting equality within and beyond their organisations 4.2 Papers that come before the Board and other major Committees identify equalityrelated impacts including risks, and say how these risks are to be managed 4.3 Middle managers and other line managers support their staff to work in culturally competent ways within a work environment free from discrimination Policy Author Signature: Date: Equalities Lead Signature: Date: Capability Policy 0.1 Page 19 of 20

Capability Policy 0.1 Page 20 of 20