Common and Not So Common Fertility Issues in the Region for Soybean and Wheat

Similar documents
Institute of Ag Professionals

Split Application- North Dakota Perspective. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science Extension Soil Specialist, NDSU, Fargo

Overview of the Principles of Nitrogen Management and Sources on Crop Production. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Do not oven-dry the soil

Fertility requirements for peas and alternative crops. Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Cover Crops, Crop Nutrition. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

NDSU Soybean Production Factors - Research and Recommendation Update

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Minnesota Wheat Check- Off

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Cover Crops, Crop Nutrition. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

SF723 (Revised) Barley

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Institute of Ag Professionals

Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Pulse Crop Inoculation and Fertilization January 13, 2017 Hill County Extension Pulse Workshop

Soil Nutrient Management: Testing, Sources, and Foliar Application Soils Workshops for Hill, Blaine and Phillips Counties Feb.

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

N and P Placement and Timing of Dryland Winter Wheat Varieties K. J. Larson and L. Herron 1

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Nitrogen Management Products. John E. Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Economics of Soil Fertility Management

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

Response to Starter Applied Sulfur in Combination with Nitrogen and Phosphorus across a Landscape

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

2013 Contract Research Report

Fertilizing Small Grains in Arizona

Timing of Foliar Applications

RESEARCH REPORT SUWANNEE VALLEY AREC 92-5 August, 1992 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS N SCHEDULING METHODS FOR SNAPBEANS

USE OF STRIP-TILLAGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS

Managing Nitrogen for Corn. Jim Camberato Dan Emmert Bob Nielsen Brad Joern

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. CHAPTER 29 Evaluating the Success of N, K, and P Fertilizer Applications

Monitoring Soil Nutrients in Dryland Systems Using Management Units

Nitrogen & Nutrient Strategies for 2014

Sidedress. trogen Uptake. Seasonal Nit. 80% of requirement after V8-10

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Nitrogen Rate Determination for Winter Wheat. Maximizing the Yield of Winter Wheat. Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories

SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED SPRING WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. B. D. Brown University of Idaho, Parma Research and Extension Center

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

ENHANCED NITROGEN FOR HARD WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN Brad Brown University of Idaho, Parma R & E Center

Utilizing farmers changed nitrogen application technologies to demonstrate improved nutrient management practices year 2

STARTER POTASSIUM FOR CORN: WHY AND WHEN? Nicolas Bergmann, Antonio P. Mallarino, and Daniel E. Kaiser * Iowa State University, Ames.

Phosphorus and Potassium Recommendations for Illinois Crops

Crop Rotation, Prosaro Fungicide, Seed Treatment and Cultivar as Management Tools to Control Disease on 2-Row Barley, Langdon, 2009

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management. Larry Zibilske, Ph.D.

Central Region Ag Agent Update Choteau, April 4, 2017

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

ON-FARM NETWORK SOYBEAN TRIAL RESULTS

Determining Fertilizer Formulations

Where do Pulse Crops Fit into Soil Health? The Role of Pulse Crops in Improving Soil Health

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Cropping System Nutrient Management

NITROGEN, SULFUR, POTASSIUM AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION IN ALFALFA WHEN ARE THEY NECESSARY? Richard T. Koenig 1 ABSTRACT

Approaches to N Recommendations in the North Central Region

Liquid vs Dry Phosphorus Fertilizer Formulations with Air Seeders

Increasing Importance of Sulfur for Field Crops

Soil fertility levels

SULFUR AND TENNESSEE ROW CROPS

The 4Rs and Potassium. Sally Flis, Ph.D., CCA. Director of Agronomy, The Fertilizer Institute, Washington, D.C.

Determining Optimum Nitrogen Application Rates for Corn Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski, Carrie Laboski, and Scott Sturgul 1

Exercise 2: Determining a Phosphorus Nutrient Recommendation and Fertilizer Rate

Minnesota Wheat Research and Promotion Council

Fertilizing Potato. in North Dakota. Potato production has been a part of North Dakota agriculture NDSU EXTENSION SERVICE

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. Anthony Bly and Ron Gelderman (retired professor, SDSU Plant Science Dept.)

Putting Research to Work on the Farm. Dr. Grant Mehring: Research Director Lauren Proulx: On-Farm Research Coordinator & Agronomist

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

Conservation Seeding Practices. John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist

Testing field-moist soil samples improves the assessment of potassium needs by crops

For nmental. of 10. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS CORN, SOYBEANS, WHEAT & ALFALFA FOR. Michigan State University The Ohio State University Purdue University

The Amity Single Disc Drill is the best in the industry for productivity, accuracy, simplicity, and versatility.

Soil Fertility Recommendations for Corn

FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE PRICE OF MANURE AS A FERTILIZER Ray Massey, Economist University of Missouri, Commercial Ag Program

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

Livestock production in

NACHURS. Field Notes. In this issue...

Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops. Tom Obreza and Jerry Sartain Soil and Water Science Dept.

wheat N small plot and OFT studies

Potassium Effects on Yield, Grain Quality, Lodging, and Stalk Strength

Planting after fallow: What is the fallow syndrome and how do I manage it? Joel Ransom

Resources Conservation Practices Tillage, Manure Management and Water Quality

2004 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Area Crops Contest

Transcription:

Common and Not So Common Fertility Issues in the Region for Soybean and Wheat Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Fargo, ND

The goal of any crop nutrition program is to apply nutrients that will make you $ and at least sustain future production

Start with odd products- Biologicals Expensive starter fertilizers Humic substances Foliar enhancers There is little scientific evidence that any of these are either more effective than their conventional counterparts (starters) or that they have any positive effect on yield under field conditions.

From a South Park episode, Underpant Gnome Business Planpermission pending.

http://extension.agron.iastate.edu/compendium/index.aspx You can find this link at the bottom of my home page <Dave Franzen NDSU> Type in product name or product category to view research papers on these products

SOYBEANS AND IRON CHLOROSIS Iron chlorosis is common in North Dakota

Iron chlorosis is yellowing between the veins of the youngest leaves. Chlorosis is not expressed until the first tri-foliates emerge. Iron is mobile in the plant through the mono-foliate stage.

Strategies to deal of IDC soybean- Choose the right fields- Avoid high carbonate, poorly drained\ and high EC Plant in greater than 15 inch rows Use tolerant variety Consider a cover crop at planting Use in-furrow o-o-eddha fertilizer

Soybean with 0 pounds N per acre application, without and with a cover crop. Soybean with 100 pounds N per acre application, without and with a cover crop. Lamb and Rehm, from Franzen et al., final North Central Soybean Research Report, 2007.

FeEDDHA Fertilizer Quality Due to differences in FeEDDHA isomer concentrations Fe 3+ Fe 3+ ortho,ortho FeEDDHA ortho,para FeEDDHA

The Shuttle Effect Soil ph Soil Fe Soil ph Fe Chelate Soil ph Fe Chelate Soil ph 1.0 Soil ph 1.0 H+ Fe 3+ e- e- Fe 2+ H+ H+ e- Soil ph 1.0 Soil ph Chelate

The Shuttle Effect Soil ph Soil Fe Soil ph o-o-feeddha Soil ph Soil ph 1.0 Soil ph 1.0 o-o-feeddha H+ Fe 3+ e- e- Fe 2+ H+ H+ e- Soil ph 1.0 Soil ph o-o-eddha

In soybean, in IDC field areas, 2 lb/acre Soygreen or equivalent ortho-ortho FeEDDHA can increase yield. - The ortho-ortho component is important - Do not substitute Fe for good field selection - Use of an IDC intolerant variety or seeding into a high salt soil (greater than 2 mmohs/cm) will result in disaster even with Fe fertilizer Use Fe fertilizer with tolerant variety in lower salt soil.

Air is 78% N 2, but plants cannot use N 2 directly

Roots absorb nutrients and interact with soils primarily from the root hairs

Bacteria are attracted to the root through chemical signals

Once in contact with the root hair, a root compound, lectin, binds the bacteria to the root hair cell wall

The bacteria releases a chemical that causes the root hair to curl and crack, producing a means of internal infection D.J. Gage, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2004:68 280-300

Bacteria take over control of some cortex cells, transforming them into nodules, which contain colonies of bacteria called bacteroids, each containing up to 10,000 bacteria.

Bacteroids are bathed in nutrients from the host. Bacteria take N 2 gas from soil air and transform into NH 4 + using the enzyme nitrogenase.

NITROGENASE Nitrogenase is made up from one Fe-Mo (iron-molybdenum) protein and two Febased proteins. Iron and molybdenum deficiencies are therefore a problem for legumes in some situations.

NITROGENASE Nitrogenase activity takes place in an environment without oxygen Plant cells still must respire, so they carry oxygen within the cell through leghemoglobin (similar to animal hemoglobin. The pink color in nodules comes from leghemoglobin.

N-fixation is energy intensive and comes with a cost It takes 10 lbs of carbohydrates to make 1 lb N 150 lbs N requires 1500 lbs carbohydrate

NITROGEN SOURCES AND SINKS Early in growth, carbohydrates are made in leaves (source) and are sent to the roots (sink) At early pod-set, carbohydrate direction changes, and pods become the major sink. Nodules begin to deteriorate and eventually disintegrate, dispersing bacteria into the soil.

Inoculants are specific for each legume Soybean Rhizobium is Bradyrhizobium, sp

When should an inoculum be used? Inoculate when growing soybeans the first few times. Consider inoculation when soybeans were last grown over four years ago.

Yield response of soybean to seed inoculation with or without previous soybean history* Soybean in rotation Number of sites Sites that had a significant yield response to inoculant yes 43 7 % no 13 93 *Review of Midwest university studies by Bly and Gelderman (SDSU)

Yield with inoculated- vs. non inoculatedsoybean seed, Carrington, 2004-05*. 50 45 NS 45.8 45.9 Bu/acre 40 35 30 27.7 inoculated no inoculation 25 20 24.2 2004 2005 *several years of previous soybean production with inoculated seed. G. Endres, C. Bradley and B. Henson

Soybean Yield Response to Inoculation, Carrington, 1999 2006. % Change from untreated check 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 - soy history - 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 B. Henson

Phosphorus and soybeans Soybean yields can increase when soil test levels are medium or below. Seed placed fertilizer is not the best way to fertilize soybeans. Broadcast P increases yields more than banded P.

Soybean Fertilizer Placement With a double-disc drill or air-seeder with 6-7 inch row-spacing, the maximum N to apply is about 10 lb/acre. HOWEVER,

WHY APPLY FERTILIZER WITH SOYBEAN SEED WHEN BROADCAST USUALLY YIELDS MORE??? EFFECT OF BAND VS BROADCAST ON SOYBEAN -------------Yield, bu/acre -------------- Band Broadcast Nebraska 35.4 40.6 Minnesota 52.0 54.8 Bands are 2X2, Minnesota data from 7 inch rows.

Soybean response to broadcast vs banded P. G. Rehm, Nebraska. Ave of 3 site-years. P2O5, lb/a Broadcast Placement method Yield, bu/a 2 X 2 Band 0 35.5 34.4 20 39.7 35.1 40 41.1 36.2 60 44 39.1 80 42.4 37.1

Can you apply needed P for previous crop and let soybean feed on the residual? Yes if you have high (>15 ppm) P tests No for most growers.

Why are growers in the I states successful in putting P on for corn and letting soybeans feed on residual? Their P tests are almost all in the high range. Common P fertilizer rates in the I states are 250-300 pounds per acre of 18-46-0, and sometimes higher, every other year.

Why do we fertilize every crop? Do most farmers really have a rotation? Most appear to have a crop selection, directed by market forces. Is soybean/snow/soybean really a rotation? (hint-no) NDSU/U of MN / SDSU researchers have long embraced the Sufficiency Approach to Fertilizer Application

Buildup-Maintenance- Fertilize the soil This results in a high fertility environment most economically justified in region with -very low crop failure frequency and -high crop yield potential

Sufficiency Approach- Fertilize the crop This results in a lower soil fertility environment economically justified in regions with -high crop failure frequency and -lower crop yield potential - The Northern Plains have no Class I soils due to climate. Ask any FFA/4H Soil Judging team veteran -In Illinois, I worked with older growers who farmed from 1940 s to 1988 and never experienced a crop failure until then. There was another in 2012.

In contrast, since I have been here, there have been at least 12 in the state or in regions of the state in 21 years. Prevent planting almost every year it has been available, and abandoned acres in some part of the region due to excess rainfall or drought nearly every year somewhere. Also, many of our fields yield potential is not only compromised by short growing seasons, but soil salinity. The I states are burdened by none of these conditions.

We re not Iowa Capital of North Dakota is Bismarck, not Des Moines. We grow soybean, they grow soybean, but soil, climate and soil factors are very, very different.

MES or MESZ vs MAP? MES is a MAP-based product with imbedded S and (MESZ) Zn, but the imbedding process is much more sophisticated than a gardenblend granule. S and Zn are very finely divided and scientifically dispersed within the granule uniformly for maximum effect. Is the P better than MAP- No

MES or MESZ vs MAP? S is half ammonium sulfate, half elemental S, so the ammonium sulfate part is useful and the elemental part only slightly so. I consider MES15 to be MES7.5, MES10 to be MES5 and so on. The Zinc part is mostly water soluble, but soybean and wheat do not respond to Zn in our area regardless of soil test, so it is a waste.

2000 S deposition 2013 S deposition

Relative corn yield to S test, IA, Sawyer. 120 110 100 Relative Yield (%) 90 80 70 60 50 Relative Yield Without S Application 2007-0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Extractable Soil Sulfate-S (ppm)

Crop Potassium (K) Removal Plant K content in crops Crop Grain Stover Total K 2 O removal- grain* -------- lb/bu K 2 O ------- Lb K 2 O/a Corn 0.3 1.2 1.5 39 Wheat 0.3 1.6 1.9 15 Soybean 1.4 1.0 2.4 56 * 130 bu/a corn, 50 bu/a wheat, 40 bu/a soybean

2 1

6 3 4 7 5 8

N recommendation 2014 to 2016 2014 - Eastern ND - Conventional Till - High productivity - After soybean - Organic matter 4% - Soil test 30 lb N/acre - $8 wheat - 50 cent N Recommendation 155 lb N

N recommendation 2014 to 2016 2016 - Eastern ND - Conventional Till - High productivity - After soybean - Organic matter 4% - Soil test 30 lb N/acre - $5 wheat - 50 cent N Recommendation 120 lb N

Most profitable N recommendation 2014-155 lb N 2016-120 lb N Should you plant Faller this year??? Will the increase in yield offset discount?

Variety Likely Bushels Likely Protein Faller 100 12 $350 Glenn 80 14 $400 Return $5 wheat- Discount 75cents per pt

Apply N in an efficient manner- Put urea in the soil Ammonia at least 4 inches deep In soils with high N loss risk, consider split application with stream-bars to avoid wet May/early June period. Get supplemental N on by early jointing

Active optical sensors have been identified as a tool to increase nitrogen-use efficiency Greenseeker (Trimble) Holland Crop Circle Sensor (Holland Scientific)

Yield, bu/acre 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Greenseeker 4-5 leaf Spring Wheat INSEY vs Yield, 2 sites 2013 y = -5E+08x 2 + 1E+06x - 464.41 R² = 0.5315 0 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.0010 0.0012 18 Greenseeker INSEY Crop Circle Red Edge NDVI INSEY, Spring Wheat, Flag leaf, 2 Sites/Varieties 2013 Per Cent Grain Protein 16 14 12 y = 8.7845ln(x) + 86.153 R² = 0.3045 10 0.00016 0.00020 0.00024 0.00028 0.00032 0.00036 Crop Circle Red Edge NDVI INSEY

An ESN blend before or at planting may also delay N release later into the season. Results from Montana and South Dakota are mixed. MT results indicate little gain from ESN over urea, but they are in a dry environment. South Dakota results showed increase in grain protein with use of ESN.

Finney et al., 1957, Agronomy Journal

Finney et al., 1957, Agronomy Journal

Protein response of post-anthesis N-Pact application, 3 gal/acre. Valley City, 2008

2009 Carrington, ave. 2 sites, post-anthesis application for protein enhancement. Schatz 15 14.5 14 13.5 Irr Faller Lebsock average 13 untreated check 10 gal UAN 12 gal Coron 2 gal Coron Faller yields over 100 bu/acre Slide courtesy of Greg Endres, NDSU, Carrington REC

Wheat yield increase from broadcast or Banded P. Average of six sites, Zubriski, P 2 O 5 applied, lb/a Banded with seed Broadcast 12 24 48 48 3.8 5.0 5.5 3.3

Banded P vs Broadcast in Wheat, Rasc, MB Rate of P 2 O 5, lb/a 25 banded 25 broadcast 50 banded 50 broadcast Wheat yield, bu/a 40 39 43 40 Most studies resulted in about 10% yield increase with banded over broadcast for wheat

Sulfur? Sulfur deficiency has been common in many soils the last couple years and the frequency of problems is increasing. Especially important for wheat but not so much for soybean.

Carrington, 2014 (Teboh and Zilahi-Sebess) Wheat response to S Sulfur rate, lb/acre Yield, bu/acre Protein, % 0 64 15.2 10 71 15.6 $ Return- $69.60 net

- Avoid products of questionable need - Select proper fields for soybean production - Use o-o-feeddha in furrow at planting - No N is required for soybean - Inoculant on previous soybean ground optional - Apply N to wheat based on N calculator - Use a high efficiency N application method - Plant a higher protein wheat variety - Consider S for wheat - Don t fall asleep if conditions for loss occur- be ready to supplement N/S