Nadcap Supplier Symposium. The Bodycote Experience. UK Perspective Gareth Armstrong Quality Manager UK Bodycote Heat Treatments Limited

Similar documents
Nadcap Asia Symposium October - November, 2011

Nadcap A Regulator s View. Dr E H Blacklay 21 March 2017

SUPPLIER EVALUATION CHECKLIST

Please retain this letter for future reference, as it details the current GEAE quality system requirements.

EN39 TUBE ASSESSMENT REPORT. Assessment Summary

YOUR CERTIFICATION PROCESS EXPLAINED

Beechcraft Corporation Special Processes Index Special Processes that Require Approval to Perform

Supplier Quality Assurance Requirements

LT Industries SQFR 101

Program Document WLDBOK

Nadcap Overview. Nadcap Asia Symposium in Japan Oct31 st- Nov 1 st, 2011

IAQG 9101:2014 (Rev. E)

Guidance Documents for Aviation, Space and Defence Organizations. Appendix-5 - Work Transfer Management -

ADVANCED INTERNAL AUDIT WORKSHOP

Security Operations. BS EN ISO 9001: 2008 Issue 1.2: 21/10/2016. Quality Manual. Managing Director. Controlled / Uncontrolled when printed

EASA Part 21 Compliance Matrix

Total 155 files quick download in editable form by e delivery

Metallurgical Aspects of IGT Component Repair

Total 155 files quick download in editable form by e delivery

SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES AND ADVANCED MANUFACTURING

NADCAP NEWSLETTER Nadcap: 25 Years of Excellence

Correlation Matrix & Change Summary

BS2482 TIMBER BOARDS ASSESSMENT REPORT. Assessment Summary

AS9102 Frequently Asked Questions

Welding Performance Qualification Test Administrators GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS

QMS CO-ORDINATOR & GENERAL PROCEDURES:-

Materials and Qualification Procedures for Ships

The purpose of this procedure is to define internal audit activities of PRI s administration of the Industry Managed Accreditation Programs.

P. 1. Identify the Differences between ISO9001:2000 與 ISO9001:2008 ISO9001:2008 ISO9001:2000 版本的異同. 5 January 2009 ISO 9000 SERIES

Vac Aero International. Heat Treating

Quality management systems

D118: DEMO OF INSPECTION AGENCY SYSTEM DOCUMENT KIT Price 450 USD

MedAccred Sterilization (STN)

Nuclear Quality Standard Association General information about Quality Management System in the nuclear industry

APS Cleaning Quality Management System Scope of Certification The provision of commercial and industrial cleaning services throughout Queensland.

THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO ISO14001

GE Oil & Gas Quality Management System Pressure Control Supplier Quality Requirements Heat Treatment Services SQ-07 Rev: 2.0

Transition Strategy for VDA 6.1, VDA 6.2 and VDA 6.4. Revision January Contents. 1. Foreword

CHECKLIST FOR PART 145 APPROVAL

ISO 9000 Certification

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED 2 of 13

ISO AUDIT PREPARATION KIT 2016

SPECIAL AUDITS WHAT, WHY AND HOW?

Vendor Qualification Survey

Guidance on the Application. of ISO / IEC Accreditation International Association for Certifying Bodies

Comparison of BS and BS EN for steel materials

OPAC EN Operating Procedure for the Attestation of Conformity of Structural Bearings in compliance with Annex ZA of EN 1337/3/4/5/6/7

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES:

REDUCES ADMIN & TESTING COST

HACCPEUROPA PUBLICATIONS ISO 22000:2005 FOOD SAFETY QUALITY MANUAL. ISO 22000:2005 Quality Manual

Moving to the AS9100:2016 series. Transition Guide

SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

ISO Collaborative Business Relationship Management Your implementation guide

4. RELATED DOCUMENTS AND FORMS 4.1. AS ISO Cambridge Valley Machining, Inc. QMS procedures, including, but not limited to:

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION RULES FOR THE AEROSPACE AND DEFENCE SECTOR RG 02

Appendix QI. Intra-Lockheed Martin Work Transfer Agreement (IWTA) Quality Requirements for Deliverable Items

Moving from ISO/TS 16949:2009 to IATF 16949:2016. Transition Guide

9100 revision Changes presentation clause-by-clause. IAQG 9100 Team November 2016

Conformity Assessment - Requirements for the Operation of Various Types of Bodies Performing Inspection

DALAIR LIMITED QUALITY MANUAL

Quality Procedure QP320 Supplier Management

Lessons Learned from an ISO 9001:2015 Transition. Tamara Hueston 12 October 2017

QP-740. Revision J. Revision Date Reason Signature. B 4/14/11 Add sections: 6.4, 6.5, 9.9, 9.10 & Amend sections 6.2, & 9.

EA-7/04 Legal Compliance as a part of accredited ISO 14001: 2004 certification

Overview of Good Food Laboratory Practices

Supplier/ sub-contractor/ partners audit and control. NAA Level of involvement.

AS9101 Revision E Understanding the Changes

Total 127 files quick download in editable form by e delivery

Properties of Reinforcing Steels

Vendor Quality. Requirements Manual

Quality Magazine, March Good-bye QS-9000? As the market grows, automakers look for unity in global standards.

SUPPLIER QUALITY MANUAL

IAQG 9100:2016 Clarifications

ISO General Requirements for Competence of Testing Laboratories Procedure

BEGINNERS GUIDE TO ISO 9001 : 2000

DEVELOPEMENT OF A PRODUCTION ORGANIZATION EXPOSITION SCHEME TAKING INTO ACCOUNT EN9100 REQUIREMENTS

Quality Assurance Procedure Issued: 15NOV2017 Page 1 of 11

IAQG 9101:2016 (Rev F)

BEGINNER S GUIDE TO ISO 9001 : Quality Management System Requirements Explained

Supplier Manual Rev /15

NR CHECKLIST Rev. 1. QAM IMP References NBIC Part 3, 1.8 Y N Y N a. Organization. Company Name/Certificate Number: Page 1 of 26

#.# Section Modified and Revision Description Date Author 1.0 Initial release 7/13/2011 Celine McCulloch

ISO /TS 29001:2010 SYSTEMKARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER

QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL

AS9003A QUALITY MANUAL

Objective Evidence Record (OER)

ALTA Precision Inc. Quality Procedure

Supplier Quality Requirements

GKN Aerospace Supplier Quality Assurance Manual

QUALITY MANUAL. Number: M-001 Revision: C Page 1 of 18 THIS DOCUMENT IS CONSIDERED UNCONTROLLED UNLESS ISSUED IDENTIFIED AS CONTROLLED

UPPLIER ANUAL. Issued: 01 Aug 13

PPI/TZ Standard Quality Requirements for Suppliers -SQRS-

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System QMS Manual

FAIRFIELD GLOBAL SUPPLIER QUALITY PROGRAM

3.2 Direction, Management, Implementation and Review

TUV SUD BABT PRODUCTION QUALITY CERTIFICATION SCHEME

Changes to the Red Tractor Farm Assurance schemes- FAQs

EA MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT Facilitating cross border trade with reliable goods and services

Corrosion Resistant Bolting for Use in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries

Supplier Quality Requirements Manual

Transcription:

Nadcap Supplier Symposium The National Motorcycle Museum in Solihull on 25 th September 2013 The Bodycote Experience UK Perspective Gareth Armstrong Quality Manager UK Bodycote Heat Treatments Limited

Agenda Why we have Nadcap? Quality Management System Requirements A Brief Introduction to Bodycote / Relevant History Our Current Nadcap Status Challenges we Faced / What we Have Learned / Our Current Approach Benefits of Nadcap Disadvantages of Nadcap Suggested Future Opportunities & Recommendations 2

Why do we have Nadcap? Because our Aerospace Customers Mandate it. 3

Quality System Before you consider Nadcap you need to ensure your Quality Management System holds up. Two Alternatives are available to you: 1 AC7004 offered by PRI Cost Saving Opportunity Is ideal if your business solely services direct to Aerospace Nadcap Primes. Check AC7004 is an acceptable QMS with both your Prime & Customer? 2 AS9100 (Revision C) / BS EN ISO 9100: 2009 by a Certification Body Recognised by the I.A.Q.G. 4 Is Internationally Recognised. Foundations built on ISO 9001:2008 usually the minimum customer requirements for none aerospace industries. Multiple / Several / Campus / Complex Certification Structures are available for larger organisations.

QMS and Nadcap is there a Difference? Quality Management Systems are built on the principle of continuous business improvement practices to enhance your company to become successful. Largely YES They both have their place and separate benefits but some areas can over lap. e.g. Internal Auditing of Special Processes & Contract Review Effectiveness. Nadcap is about Technical Compliance to improve / maintain Aircraft Safety and Ensure the supply chain complies to all specified technical requirements. 5

Today Bodycote is the leading provider of thermal processing services worldwide, offering subcontract: Heat Treatment Metal Joining Surface Technology Hot Isostatic Pressing Global Presence Over 190 Specialist Facilities In 26 Countries 6

History Bodycote was founded in 1923, originally a British textile company. Bodycote sole focus switches into Metals Processing & Testing Industries from 1979 onwards. Bodycote has rapidly expanded to present day by successful technology acquisitions and organic growth built on good customer service and a reputation for quality. 1986 Bodycote UK achieve BS 5750 the foundations that developed into today's Quality Management System BS EN ISO 9001:2008 & BS EN 9100 : 2009 on a Multiple Certificate Structure spanning 21 locations. This also today incorporates Nadcap procedures. 2003 Bodycote UK enters the Nadcap Program & drops Civil Aviation Authority registration for HT & EBW. 7

Nadcap Status Today Bodycote (UK) has 15 Nadcap Approvals Spanning across 13 locations. The other 8 facilities service other industries where Nadcap is not required but we do take some of the benefits learned into there daily operations. We have experienced 116 Nadcap audits over the last 10 years. Nadcap approvals cover 3 Special Process Commodity Groups & Specific Testing: Heat Treatments Fusion Welding 8 Coatings

UK Commodity Matrix Heat Treatments HEAT AC7102 AC7102 AC7102 AC7102 AC7102 AC7102 AC7102 AC7102 AC7101 AC7101 TREATMENTS AC7102 / S / 1 / 2 /3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 3 / 4 Active Location 2013 HT Base Line Prime Hardness Specific Brazing Aluminium Carburizing Nitriding Testing HIP Induction Hardening Tensile Testing Lab Metallographic & micro Hardness Cambridge YES YES YES NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO Chard YES YES NO NO YES YES YES NO NO NO YES Chesterfield YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO Coventry YES YES YES NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO Derby YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO Hereford YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO Macclesfield YES YES NO NO YES NO YES NO NO NO YES Rotherham YES YES NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO Skelmersdale YES YES YES NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO Stillington YES YES NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO Stockport YES YES YES NO NO YES YES NO NO NO YES Woodford YES YES YES NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO 9

UK Commodity Matrix Welding & Coatings EBW AC7109 AC7110 / 3 AC7110 / 3 S AC7110 / 12 AC7110 / 12 / S AC7110 / 13 AC7110 / 3 Active Location 2013 Fusion Welding Base Line Electron Beam Welding EBW Prime Specific Welder Qualification Welder Qualification Prime Specific Evaluation of Welds Evaluation of Welds Prime Specific Cambridge YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Skelmersdale YES YES YES YES YES NO NO HVOF / Plasma AC7109 AC7109 / 1 AC7109 / 4 AC7109 / 5 Active Location 2013 Coatings Base Line Thermal Spray Coatings Chemical Stripping of Coatings Coating Evaluation & Lab Practices Newport YES YES YES YES 10

Nadcap NCR Analysis as end 2012 (Includes both Major + Minor) 11 Site Type Total Audit NCR's NCR's per Day NCR's per Check Sheet Cambridge W 3 1.5 0.4 Cambridge HT 1 0.3 0.3 Chard HT 4 1.0 0.7 Coventry HT 2 0.5 0.5 Derby HT 0 0.0 0.0 Macclesfield HT 2 0.7 0.4 Newport C 6 2.0 2.0 Rotherham HT 3 0.8 1.0 Skelmersdale HT 5 1.3 1.3 Skelmersdale W 1 0.5 0.2 Stillington HT 2 0.5 0.7 Stockport HT 3 0.8 0.5 Woodford HT 2 0.5 0.5 UK Average 2.6 0.8 0.6

Jan 2013 All 10 HT & 2 W Sites Simultaneously on Merit 12 Site Type Current Status Jan 2013 Audit Frequency Cambridge W Maintain MERIT 18 Months Cambridge HT Maintain MERIT 24 Months Chard HT Maintain MERIT 18 Months Chesterfield HT (HIP) Approved (New) 12 Months Coventry HT Gain MERIT 18 Months Derby HT Maintain MERIT 24 Months Hereford HT (HIP) Approved (New) 12 Months Macclesfield HT Maintain MERIT 24 Months Newport CT Approved 12 Months Rotherham HT Maintain MERIT 18 Months Skelmersdale HT Maintain MERIT 18 Months Skelmersdale W Maintain MERIT 24 Months Stillington HT Gain MERIT 18 Months Stockport HT Maintain MERIT 18 Months Woodford HT Gain MERIT 18 Months

Culture Changes for Nadcap Implementation Suppliers Must accept all Nadcap check sheet answers are either YES or NO. Any Ambiguity = NO = NCR The site Metallurgist or site Weld Engineer / Coatings Engineer do not have the authority to deviate or accept any deviation from Prime Specifications no matter how trivial. A big culture hurdle to overcome when the process house and site expert Metallurgist is seen as the Processing Technical Expert by both internal & external customers. 13

Challenges to Over come Flow Down The cascading of Prime Specific requirements down through the supply chain to the Special Process Provider. The ideal situation is where all the requirements related to product and Prime Specific Quality Systems requirements flowed down like a cascade via the 1 st Tiers. Unfortunately in the real world it doesn t often work like this and sometimes we have to educate our customers. known as Flow Up How? Implement a Robust Contract Review System. 14

Lesson Learned ~ Robust Contract Review Contract Review is not Commercial: Price Checks & T & C s or Goods Inwards Inspection. Contract Review looks at all the technical / compliance aspects needed to meet both customer & prime specification / drawing requirements and whether we have the capability / capacity to meet them. Be prepared to stand by your Contract Review System until questions are answered satisfactory and in writing from the prime / design authority (not the first tier customer), irrespective of: Urgent Customer Delivery Requirements Aircraft on the Ground All associated pressures applied through the supply chain Parts must be Right First Time & Every Time. Apply a Zero Risk Culture to your Business. Try to Treat all products the same: do not differentiate between Aerospace and Non-Aerospace products at your facility, until all technical requirements are fully understood. 15

Why have we received a audit NCR if it was acceptable at the last audit? Auditor Inconsistency Opinion Interpretation? Clarify in Writing with the 1 Confused st Tier, 2 Prime & nd Tier, 3 rd Tier Prime Customer or Design etc Requirements & Authority Interpretation Frustrated Before Processing. You Need to build good Prime contacts to assist / interpret technical requirements. Special Process Provider Interpretation 16

Lessons Learned Invest / Upgrade in the latest technology examples include: furnace autonomous control remove / reduce the human manual factors / de-skill through process control systems. You need to build Strong Supplier Relationships examples: Thermocouple Manufacturers Equipment Manufacturers Calibration Services Laboratories & Test Houses Train & Develop your People all Levels: Metallurgy Pyrometry Contract Review / Data Card Construction Inspection / Testing / Evaluation Root Cause & Corrective Action Strengthen by Standardisation / Common Approach across locations by sharing information. 17

Benefits of Nadcap Business Security & Retention. Enhanced Reputation for Quality & Technical Excellence. Confidence that Process Controls are of the Highest Standard. Prestige. After 10 years we are finally starting to see, less Prime Audits and more acceptance of just the Nadcap audit. Higher conformance to Prime requirements. 18

Disadvantages of Nadcap Cost of Audits Additional day to day people costs to maintain the necessary quality / conformance level. Potential delay in supply chain Turn Around Times to clarify requirements. Major Drain on site Quality / Technical Resource of Time Spent. Preparing for audits (Perform as many Self Assessments as possible) Participating (Team Approach) Answering NCR s 19

Future Opportunities & Suggestions Mutual Supplier Benefits ~ All Subscribing Special Process Providers need to have more say & involvement into the future program How?. Nadcap audits should not be scheduled by PRI at supplier meetings. PRI should continue to offer Free Training Sessions at Supplier Meetings. Heat Treatment Primes need to work towards one Global Pyrometry / Processing Standard. Like to see Introduced a Flow Down Check Sheet for Tier Manufacturers who purchase Special Processes to verify: Accurate Flow down to sub special process suppliers Adequate verification of purchased services 20

21