cttp Soils Course Overview Testing Technician Atterberg Limits LL, PL, PI

Similar documents
SPEEDY MOISTURE TEST. Equipment Needed: Complete speedy kit, No. 4 sieve, speedy chart, and sample of soil.

Laboratory 2 Hydrometer Analysis Atterberg Limits Sand Equivalent Test

Tex-121-E, Soil-Lime Testing

Soil Investigation Report November, 2014

Method of Test for Determining Target Dry Density & In-place Density of Salvaged/Recycled Materials Using the Nuclear Gauge (Test Strip)

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.3. Soil Compaction (Das, Ch. 5)

APPENDIX D ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS/PROBLEMS

HCMTCB SOILS CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures 1

DETERMINATION OF WORKABILITY OF FRESH CONCRETE BY SLUMP TEST

C. Foundation stabilization for pipe and utility structures.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 5/8/7)

May 1, 2000 LAB MANUAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY & ABSORPTION of COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO Designation T 85 (Mn/DOT Modified)

Section 25 Aggregate Subbase

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 507 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Method of Test for Density and Air Voids of Asphalt Concrete by the Marshall Method

t ghi yr Cop

Standard Practice for Molding Roller-Compacted Concrete in Cylinder Molds Using a Vibrating Hammer 1

Standard Test Methods for Determining Consistency and Density of Roller-Compacted Concrete Using a Vibrating Table 1

SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist:

METHOD A2 THE DETERMINATION OF THE LIQUID LIMIT OF SOILS BY MEANS OF THE FLOW CURVE METHOD

FREEZING AND THAWING TESTS OF COMPACTED SOIL-CEMENT MIXTURE

Soil Mechanics IX. SOIL IMPROVEMENT

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1120 MIXTURE DESIGN FOR CHEMICALLY STABILIZED SOILS. June 13, 2011

SECTION RIPRAP, BOULDERS, AND BEDDING

MOLDING, TESTING, AND EVALUATING ASPHALT BLACK BASE MATERIALS

Redi Rock Specification and Installation Manual

METHOD OF MAKING AND CURING CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS IN THE FIELD FOP FOR AASHTO T 23

Standard Test Procedures Manual

BASE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS A Aggregate

TESTING SOIL CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE SECURITY BARRIER TESTS

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE UNIT PAVEMENT

The Work under this Section consists of performing all operations necessary to complete construction of the leveling course on the prepared subbase.

SECTION AGGREGATES

Module - CE 3132 Geotechnical Engineering Assignment Triaxial Test Marks 10% Learning Outcome

CETCO-VOLCLAY CG-50 SPECIFICATION GUIDELINES MIX IN PLACE

PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING PAVERS

ITEM D-701 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS

Laboratory Certification For. National Engineering Services for Rehabilitation of Afghanistan (NESRA)

Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head) 1

A. Texas Department of Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT).

Proctor Compaction Testing

GENERAL SHALE NATURAL THIN ROCK VENEER Installation Guide. GeneralShale.com

SECTION 402 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEVELING

CHAPTER 5 BLENDING AGGREGATES

-vs- Figure 4.1. Comparison of the residual asphalt content of different binders.

CIV E Geotechnical Engineering I Consolidation

Soil Volume Change Meter (PVC)

The GREENBOOK 2015 Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction

4.1 DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY

Extraction and Sieve Analysis ( µm minus) Forming Marshall Specimens, Field Method

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

A. Texas Department Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT):

Standard Cut vs. Keyhole

OLD BRICK ORIGINALS KILN-FIRED THIN BRICK VENEER Installation Guide. RobinsonBrick.com

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GANDHINAGAR Department of Civil Engineering Soil Mechanics Laboratory

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 102(A)-95

2.3. KT-3; Material Passing No. 200 (75µm) Sieve by the Wash Method

HYDROGRID SUBSURFACE IRRIGATED HARTRU TENNIS COURTS

What Do The Sand Testing Numbers Mean

PAVING SLABS ON A CONCRETE BASE

HANDS-ON TRAINING: MATERIALS AND MIX DESIGN

Engineering Properties of Foamed Recycled Glass as a Lightweight Fill

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

Concrete. Chapter 10 Properties of Fresh Concrete. Materials of Construction-Concrete 1. Wikipedia.org

Porosity of Compost Water retention capacity of Compost Organic matter content of Compost Buffering capacity of Compost

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Mix Design & Construction -1-

BACKFILL COMPACTION FOR VOLCLAY WATERPROOFING: An Essential Ingredient for a Successful Project

SECTION SPECIFICATION FOR STONEBRIDGE RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

2012 Canadian Asphalt Mix Exchange Program Marshall Mix Design Instructions to Participants

Engineering Properties of Soils

Minimum Sample and Test Requirements (MSTR)

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR LATEX MODIFIED EMULSION TREATMENT (MICRO-SURFACING)

LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALLS

Standard Test Methods for Moisture-Density (Unit Weight) Relations of Soil-Cement Mixtures 1

VERTI-BLOCK - DESIGN MANUAL

SECTION A1 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL GENERAL

Design Manual: Gravity Wall. Section 1

REPORT STATUS: DATE: Report n :

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS laboratory manual

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering

Florida Method of Test for NONREPETITIVE STATIC PLATE LOAD TEST OF SOILS AND FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT COMPONENTS

Determining Asphalt Binder Bond Strength by Means of the Binder Bond Strength (BBS) Test

Tex-239-F, Asphalt Release Agent

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

TRENCH SAFETY FINAL EXAMINATION

The entire document shall be read and understood before proceeding with a test. ISTA 3B Page 1 of 35

Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils 1

Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. TMMB Printing

Cement Stabilized Soil (CSS) (Portland cement)

TURF-TEC 6 and 12 INCH INFILTRATION RINGS INSTRUCTIONS (IN7-W & IN8-W)

CRUSHED AGGREGATE BLENDED WITH GRANITECRETE ADMIXTURE SURFACING

Design of Rigid Pavements

STABILIZATION OF PLASTIC SOIL USING MARBLE DUST, RICE HUSK AND FLY ASH : Review

A H M 531 The Civil Engineering Center

THE INFLUENCE OF FINES CONTENT AND PLASTICITY ON THE STRENGTH AND PERMEABILITY OF AGGREGATE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL

Transcription:

cttp Center for Training Transportation Professionals Soils Testing Technician Course Overview Terminology Soil Classification Sampling Soil Preparation Moisture Content Oven Speedy Moisture Tester Atterberg Limits LL, PL, PI Moisture Density Relationships Standard Modified Compaction Nuclear Density Gauge ARDOT Specifications 2 1

Test Day Written Exam 60 Questions Closed Book Exam 2 Hour Time Limit 70 % Overall Required to Pass Exam Results www.cttp.org Letter & Certificate Performance Exam 4 Exam Stations ~ Liquid Limit ~ Plastic Limit ~ ~ Nuclear Density Gauge 2 Attempts Allowed to Pass Each Station 3 Basic Aggregates Certification Renewal 5 Year Certification To prevent expiration: Take online Basic Aggregates Certification Renewal course Pass final quiz after all online modules are complete Cost - $0 (none) Extends Basic Aggregates Certification for 5 years If not completed prior to expiration date, other CTTP certifications will be suspended Soils, Hot-Mix Asphalt, Concrete, Concrete Strength 4 2

Unit Conversions Weight / Mass 1 ton 1 lb 1 kg 2000 lb 453.6 g 1000 g Convert 15 lb to grams. Convert 6804 g to lb. 5 Introduction Soil Naturally occurring unconsolidated rock particles, organic matter, water, and air Testing Grain Size influences the stability and maximum load bearing capacity of a soil Behavior Characteristics predict how a soil will behave to changes in moisture Density optimizes the engineering properties of the soil for the intended application 6 3

Terminology Air Dried Dried at 140 F (60 C) ~ Chemically bound moisture is still present in the soil ~ Moisture Content 0 Oven Dried Dried to a constant mass at a temperature of 230 ± 9 F (110 ± 5 C) ~ No moisture is present in the soil sample ~ Moisture Content = 0 7 Classification of Soils for Highway Construction Purposes AASHTO M 145 Soil Classification 8 4

AASHTO Soil Classification Granular Materials 35% Passing # 200 Boulder: 12 Cobble: 3 12 Gravel: #10 3 Sand: #10 - #200 Silt / Clay Materials > 35% Passing # 200 Silt: #200 -.002mm Clay: <.002mm PI 10 PI 11 Soil Classification 9 AASHTO Soil Classification Soil Classification 10 5

AASHTO Soil Classification Classify the following soil as a granular, silt, or clay material and determine the group number of the soil > 35% Passing # 200 = Silt or Clay = A4, A5, A6, or A7 PI 10 = Silt = A4 or A5 LL 41 = A5 Silt - Group A5 Soil Classification 11 Sampling Soils AHTD 30 Sampling 12 6

Apparatus Back hoe, auger, post hole digger, shovel Sample Containers Should prevent the loss of fines and moisture ~ Sealable plastic containers ~ Heavy doubled paper bags are ok if moisture is not to be maintained ~ Unlined cloth or open weave bags should not be used Sampling 13 Sampling Look for changes in soil types, color, or texture Sample Numbers Areas must be enclosed by at least three samples ~ Risk factor of failure ~ Uniformity of soil Typical Spacing ~ Highway: 200 2000 ~ Borrow Pits: 100 400 ~ Earth Dams: 50 150 Sampling 14 7

Documentaion Sample Location Reference landmarks ~ Fence Posts ~ Buildings / Roads Sketch Soil Samples Test Pit or Boring # Material Classification ~ Type of material ~ Color and classification Layer Depths ~ Start and end depth of each layer Comments ~ Water table levels ~ Rock outcrops Sampling 15 Test Pit Sampling 16 8

Boring Sampling 17 Dry Preparation of Disturbed Soil Samples for Test AASHTO R 58 Dry Preparation 18 9

Apparatus Drying Apparatus Fan, heat lamp, oven Sieves 2, ¾, # 4, # 10, # 40 Additional sizes as needed by specific test Pulverizing Apparatus Mortar & Rubber - covered Pestle Power Equipment with Rubber -covered Rollers Individual grain sizes may not be reduced in size! Dry Preparation 19 Air dry material 140 F (60 C) Reduce sample Split or Quarter Select appropriate sieve according to test procedure to be performed Process soil over specified sieve Pulverize material retained on screen Rescreen the material Repeat until all composite soils are broken up Combine and mix all material passing the specified screen Use AASHTO R 74 (Wet-Prep) for hard-toprocess soils, or soils which need to maintain their natural moisture contents Dry Preparation 20 10

Test Method for Moisture Content of Soils AHTD 348 AASHTO T 265 Moisture Content 21 ARDOT Specifications Oven Drying ~ Most Accurate ~ Slow Results Speedy Moisture ~ Limited to finer grained soils ~ Quick Results ~ No license required Nuclear Density Gauge ~ Accuracy may fluctuate based on surrounding conditions ~ Quick Results ~ Nuclear license required Field Testing Moisture Content 22 11

Balance 0.1 % of sample wt. ~ 10 g 0.01 g ~ 100 g 0.1 g ~ 500 g 0.5 g Oven 230 ± 9 F (110 ± 5 C) Moisture Tins Corrosion Resistant Close-fitting Lids Apparatus Moisture Content 23 Record tin number and empty weight of clean, dry, tin Tare weight Place wet soil into tin Cover with lid Weigh sample tin Record weight of Wet Soil + Tare Dry sample at 230 F to a constant mass Remove lid Moisture Content 24 12

Remove tin from oven Cover with lid % Cool sample to room temperature Record weight of Dry Soil + Tare W = wet weight of soil D = dry weight of soil Report moisture content to the nearest 0.1 % Moisture Content 25 Calculation Determine the moisture content of the soil Wet Wt + Tare Dry Wt + Tare Tare Weight 30.62 g 29.55 g 18.76 g % Wet Soil = 30.62 18.76 = 11.86 Dry Soil = 29.55 18.76 = 10.79... % Moisture Content.. %. % 9.9 % 26 13

Calculation Determine the moisture content of the soil Wet Wt + Tare Dry Wt + Tare Tare Weight 44.75 g 40.33 g 13.00 g Moisture Content 27 Special Cases Soil containing minerals which have loosely bound water from hydration Gypsum Soil containing significant amounts of organic materials Solutions Oven dry at 140 F Use vacuum desiccation at 10 mm Hg at a temperature of 73 F Moisture Content 28 14

Sieve Analysis of Soils AASHTO T 11 AASHTO T 27 Sieve Analysis 29 Sieve Analysis of Soils Determines the grain size distribution of soils Used for: Soil Classification Specification Compliance Differences Soil Sieve Sizes ~ 2, 1½, 1, ¾, 3/8, #4, #10, #40, #200 Washing ~ Use wetting agent if necessary ~ Allow extra soak time Sieve Analysis 30 15

ARDOT Specifications Embankment Material # 200 Specification Plating Material Protects subgrade slopes and grows vegetative covers Typical specifications in range of PI = 10 25 AHTD Select Materials Foundation for base course Sieve Analysis 31 Liquid State Flows and changes shape easily Plastic State Moldable and retains shape Solid State Breaks rather than change shape -- Liquid Limit -- -- Plastic Limit -- Plasticity Index Introduction Atterberg limits characterize how a soil will behave with changes in moisture contents Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Atterberg Limits 32 16

Plastic Limit of Soils AASHTO T 90 Plastic Limit 33 Plastic Limit The lowest moisture content at which the soil remains plastic A soil is at its plastic limit when it begins to crumble when rolled to a 3 mm diameter Plastic Limit 34 17

Apparatus Scales (0.01 g) Oven 110 ± 5 C 230 F Ground Glass Plate Unglazed Paper Ceramic Bowl Moisture Tin Spatula Referee Test Hand Roll Use distilled, demineralized, or de-ionized water only Plastic Limit 35 Air dry the soil Process soil over # 40 sieve Add water to soil until moldable Mix thoroughly Allow to season Remove 10 g Form soil into a ball Preparation Plastic Limit 36 18

Record empty tin # and tare weight Pinch off a small pea sized piece of soil and form an ellipsoidal shape 10 g 1.5 2 g Roll specimen into a thread of 3 mm ( ⅛ ) uniform diameter Roll on ground side of glass plate at 80-90 strokes per minute If thread crumbles before reaching 3 mm, add water and remix Ball Pea Ellipsoid Plastic Limit 37 When thread reaches 3 mm in diameter, re-form soil into an ellipsoidal shape Do not roll past 3 mm Repeat rolling process until soil crumbles before reaching or just as it reaches 3 mm Place crumbled soil portions into tin Cover tin with lid Select another pea and repeat process until entire 10 g sample is tested Plastic Limit 38 19

Immediately weigh tin and record the Wet Wt + Tare Place tin in oven to dry Cool sample to room temperature Weigh and record the Dry Wt + Tare Calculate MC Moisture content of sample Report Plastic Limit (PL) Round moisture content to nearest whole number Plastic Limit 39 Calculation Determine the plastic limit of the soil Wet Wt + Tare Dry Wt + Tare Tare Weight 26.63 g 24.14 g 13.20 g 10.94 g Dry 13.43 g Wet... %. %. % PL = 23 Plastic Limit 40 20

Calculation Determine the plastic limit of the soil Wet Wt + Tare Dry Wt + Tare Tare Weight 31.25 g 30.10 g 18.70 g Plastic Limit 41 Liquid Limit of Soils AASHTO T 89 Liquid Limit 42 21

Introduction 2 mm The liquid limit of a soil is the moisture content necessary to close a 2 mm wide groove, for a length of 13 mm in 25 blows 13 mm 25 Blows Liquid Limit 43 Scales (0.01 g) Oven 110 ± 5 C 230 F Liquid Limit Machine Grooving Tool AASHTO Curved ASTM Flat Gauge 10.0 ± 0.2 mm Apparatus Liquid Limit 44 22

LL Machine Check Points of contact Wear areas Pin Play / Screws Liquid Limit 45 Calibrate Cup Drop Dissect the point of contact with smooth side of tape Lower cup so that it is resting on the base Insert gauge block until it is in contact with the tape ~ Hold gauge block so that it lies flat against the base Daily Check Liquid Limit 46 23

Calibrate Cup Drop Check drop height Turn crank ~ Cup should make a clicking sound without lifting from gauge block To adjust drop height Loosen set screw Turn adjustment screw Tighten set screw Re-check drop height Reset gauge block Check drop height Set Screw Remember to remove tape when done! Adjustment Screw Liquid Limit 47 Soil Preparation Air dry soil Dry or Wet Prep soil using # 40 sieve Add water and mix until soil obtains a peanut butter-like consistency Add water in small increments ~ Adding water too rapidly may produce a false liquid limit value If soil becomes too wet, do not add dry soil Use natural evaporation Liquid Limit 48 24

Method B (1 Point) Record empty tin # Weigh and record empty tare weight Include lid Liquid Limit 49 10 mm Method B (1 Point) Place soil in cup Depth of 10 mm Avoid entrapment of air bubbles within the soil Cover unused soil to retain moisture Liquid Limit 50 25

Divide the soil in the cup with the grooving tool Cut groove along centerline of cup ~ Up to 6 strokes allowed to reach bottom of cup ~ No more cuts after touching the bottom of the cup Groove must be 2 ± 0.1 mm wide Method B (1 Point) Liquid Limit 51 Turn Crank 2 rev. / second Count # blows Stop at 13 mm closure Do not hold device Blow Range 22-28 Method B (1 Point) # Blows outside 22-28 Adjust moisture & retry # Blows 22 28 Immediately verify test Verification Test Redo test ~ Do not adjust moisture ± 2 blows of previous test 22 28 blows Liquid Limit 26

Record blow count of verification test Method B (1 Point) Obtain MC sample Take sample perpendicular to groove and include the closed portion Sample weight 10 g Record Wet Wt. + Tare Dry sample at 230 F Cool sample Record Dry Wt + Tare Liquid Limit 53 Calculate moisture content (%) Correct moisture content to 25 Blows K-factor Report Round corrected moisture content to nearest whole number for the liquid limit Method B (1 Point). Liquid Limit 54 27

Calculation Method B (1 Point) Determine the liquid limit of the soil Wet Wt + Tare 31.60 g Dry Wt + Tare 27.14 g 27 blows Tare Weight 14.50 g k 27 = 1.009.. %. %. %.... LL= 36 Liquid Limit 55 Calculation Method B (1 Point) Determine the liquid limit of the soil Wet Wt + Tare 30.71 g Dry Wt + Tare 28.32 g 23 blows Tare Weight 13.88 g Liquid Limit 56 28

Method A (3 Point) Record three tin # s and tare weights Obtain proper closure in each of the ranges (1) 25 35 Blows (2) 20 30 Blows 10 (3) 15 25 Blows No verification Record blow counts Obtain MC sample and weights from each point Add additional water to adjust MC between points and mix well Check blow count difference 10 Liquid Limit 57 Calculate all three moisture contents Plot MC vs # Blows Semi-logarithmic paper ½ way is 3/5 Draw best fit line Find MC at 25 blows Report Liquid Limit (LL) Round MC at 25 blows to nearest whole number Method A (3 Point) Moisture Content ( % ) 40 38 36 34 32 Liquid Limit 30 10 LL = 35 Flow Curve 20 30 40 Blow Count Blow Range # Blows MC 25-35 33 31.5 20-30 27 34.2 15-25 19 36.7 58 29

Calculation Determine the liquid limit of the soil # Blows MC 17 39.1 24 38.5 30 36.2 Moisture Content (%) 40 39 38 37 36 Flow Curve 35 10 20 30 40 Blow Count Liquid Limit 59 Referee Tests Method A (3 point) Curved grooving tool Use distilled or demineralized water only Times Mixing 5 10 min. Seasoning 30 min. Remixing 1 min. Testing 3 min. Adjusting 3 min. No dry soil may be added to the seasoned soil being tested Liquid Limit 60 30

Plasticity Index of Soils AASHTO T 89 Plasticity Index (PI) is the range of moisture contents where the soil exhibits plastic properties Higher PI Values (> 10) ~ Clayey soils Lower PI Values ( 10) ~ Aggregates ~ Sands ~ Silts Plasticity Index 61 Calculation PI = Plasticity Index LL = Liquid Limit PL = Plastic Limit Report PI to the nearest whole number Determine the plasticity index of the soil LL = 37 PL = 23 PI = 14 Plasticity Index 62 31

Special Reporting Report PL Cannot be Determined ~ If specimen cannot be rolled to 3 mm Report LL Cannot be Determined ~ If soil slides in the cup at blow counts less than 25 Report PI Non Plastic (NP) if any of the following are true ~ LL could not be determined ~ PL could not be determined ~ PL is LL Liquid & Plastic Limit 63 Questions? 64 32

Water % Moisture content is based on the dry weight of soil W A W W Air Water W D Solids (dry soil) Water 65 Water Δ MC - % Desired change in moisture content Δ MC = Target MC - MC W Wet weight of soil or total weight of soil D Dry weight of soil To determine how much water is needed for a desired Δ MC : Dry Weight of soil known: % Water 66 33

Water The dry weight of a soil sample is 2000.0 g. How much water will need to be added for the soil to contain 3 % moisture? % % %. 60 g or 60 ml Water 67 Water Calculation The dry weight of a soil sample is 2500.0 g. How many ml of water will need to be added for the soil to contain 10.2 % moisture? Water 68 34

Water To determine how much water is needed for a desired Δ MC : Wet Weight of soil known:. % This equation is the moisture content equation rearranged. Δ. Δ % Water 69 Water A 2630 g soil sample has a moisture content of 3.4 %. How many ml of water do you need to add to bring the soil sample to 12.0 % moisture?.. % %.... %. %. %.. %. % % Water 219 ml 70 35

Water Calculation A 5500 g soil sample has a moisture content of 1.3 %. How many ml of water do you need to add to bring the soil sample to 6.2 % moisture? Water 71 Determining Moisture Content by Speedy Moisture Tester AHTD 347 Speedy MC 72 36

Introduction Alternative method to oven drying for fine grained soils Not quite as accurate Quicker test No license to operate Calcium carbide reacts with the water in the soil Reaction produces acetylene gas Gas pressure inside the meter is measured and converted to a moisture content Based on wet mass Speedy MC 73 Introduction Testers come in many sizes and require different standard sample sizes 20 g Tester 26 g Tester 200 g Tester Caution Calcium carbide reacts violently with water Standard sample size for this class is 20 g Speedy MC 74 37

Clean tester chamber and cap prior to use Note : s are written for a Standard Sample Size of 20 g Tilt chamber on side and roll (2) steel balls into chamber Avoid dropping balls directly onto pressure port Speedy MC 75 Place 3 scoops ( 24 g) of calcium carbide into chamber Prepare soil sample Pulverize or break into small pieces Speedy MC 76 38

Weigh out 20 g of soil Check your individual tester specifications Keep chamber on it s side and secure the cap Prevents soil mixing with reagent Place soil into cap Speedy MC 77 Raise tester to a vertical position Soil must mix with reagent to produce gas Shake horizontally with a circular rotating motion for a minimum of 1 minute Speedy MC 78 39

Hold tester in a horizontal position at eye level and read dial Dial Decreasing Leak ~ Invalid Test Redo Dial Increasing Reaction not complete ~ Repeat shaking until gauge dial stabilizes ~ Need 3 consecutive identical readings What does this dial read? 11.7 % What does this dial read? 11.7 % Speedy MC 79 Record dial reading (0.1%) Point cap in a safe direction and slowly release gas pressure Examine contents and repeat test if sample is not completely pulverized Properly dispose of contents Avoid: Breathing Fumes Sources of ignition Speedy MC 80 40

Record moisture content Use ARDOT correction chart to convert from % of wet mass to % of dry mass Report moisture content To nearest 0.1% Speedy MC 81 Determine the moisture content of the soil Sample Weight 20 g Dial Reading 9.3 If the standard sample weight was used, read the moisture content directly from the AHTD correction chart MC = 10.1 % Speedy MC 82 41

Special Cases Very low moistures Double the sample size ~ Use 40 g of soil instead of 20 g Divide dial reading by 2 before going to the conversion chart Very high moistures Cut the sample size in half ~ Use 10 g of soil instead of 20 g Multiply dial reading by 2 before going to the conversion chart Speedy MC 83 Special Cases Determine the moisture content of the soil Sample Weight 10 g Dial Reading 11.5 % Read moisture content from conversion chart based on calculated value Sample weight cut in half Multiply dial reading by 2 before going to the chart 11.5 x 2 = 23.0 MC = 29.8% Speedy MC 84 42

Special Cases Determine the moisture content of the soil Sample Weight 40 g Dial Reading 7.6 % Sample weight doubled Divide dial reading by 2 before going to the chart 7.6 / 2 = 3.8 Read moisture content from conversion chart based on calculated value MC = 4.1% Speedy MC 85 Calculation Determine the moisture content of the soil Sample Weight Dial Reading 20 g 15.3 % 10 g 17.4 % 40 g 4.6 % Chart Moisture Content Speedy MC 86 43

Moisture Density Relations of Soils AASHTO T 99 AASHTO T 180 87 Compaction Compaction Densification of a soil by applying a load to the soil ~ Reduces settlement ~ Increases shear resistance ~ Reduces permeability Moisture affects compaction Compaction at the optimum water content results in the greatest density for a specified compactive effort 88 44

Compaction Below Opt. MC Soil particles pack loosely Weak, permeable soil structure Compaction is more difficult Stable soil structure is questionable Optimum MC Soil particles pack closely Interlocking soil structure Compacts moderately easy Stable soil structure Above Opt. MC Soil particles pack in layers (shear planes) Non-interlocking soil structure Compacts easily Non-stable soil structure typical 89 Curves The relationship between moisture and density establishes the proctor curve of a soil curves serve as the basis for field compaction Maximum Dry Density ~ Used in the field to determine the % compaction of the soil Optimum Moisture ~ Used in the field as a target to help achieve the desired degree of compaction and prevent instability of the soil structure 90 45

Apparatus Sieves 2, ¾, # 4 Scales 1 g or 0.005 lb or better Oven (230 ± 9 F) Mold Assembly 4 or 6 I.D. Solid or split side Straight Edge Moisture Tins Rammer 5.5 lb 12 drop 10.0 lb 18 drop 91 AASHTO Specifications T 99 (Standard) 5.5 lb Rammer 12 Drop T 180 (Modified) 10 lb Rammer 18 Drop 92 46

AASHTO Specifications γ γ 1 100 Modified : 56,000 ft-lb/ft³ Standard : 12,400 ft-lb/ft³ Compactive Effort Hammer Weight Drop Height Number of Lifts ARDOT Limit : 105 % Compaction Zero Air Voids Modified Standard 93 ARDOT Specifications method is based on the gradation of the field soil Section 210.10 Compacted Embankment 94 47

Soil Preparation Determine the gradation of the field soil ~ 2, ¾, # 4 sieves Select the appropriate procedure and method based on the gradation of the soil or other specifications Air dry field sample and process sample over the appropriate sieve (# 4 or ¾ ) Continue air drying processed sample until the desired starting moisture content is obtained 95 Reduce processed sample and obtain a representative portion(s) Rocky soils or heavy clays require individual portions ~ 4 Mold 2500 g ~ 6 Mold 6000 g Other soil types allow reuse of soil Select increment Increment - consistent change in moisture content between points ~ Usually 1 2 % ~ Maximum of 2½ % 10% 2500 g 2% 2% 2% 12% 2500 g 14% 2500 g 16% 2500 g 96 48

Determine the amount of water to be added to each point Mix water into soil to achieve a uniform moisture content 97 Allow soil to season Place in sealable containers Heavy clays must season for a minimum of 12 hours prior to compaction Tighten joint on split molds to maintain constant volume Attach mold firmly to base 98 49

Record weight of empty mold assembly (mold and base) Attach collar to mold 99 Add soil for 1 lift into mold Evenly distribute soil in mold Gently tamp soil surface Eliminates loose state Solid Compaction Surface 200 lb concrete block Sound concrete floor 100 50

Compact lift evenly using the appropriate number of blows Trim soil around mold edges and distributed evenly across the surface Pumping Repeat process for remaining lifts 101 Remove collar Trim excess soil with a straightedge so that the soil surface is even with the top of the mold Check for hammer marks ~ Re-compact point if hammer marks are seen Patch holes caused by trimming Height of soil above mold ¼ - ½ inch 102 51

Clean outside of mold Check under base Weigh filled mold 103 Extrude specimen Obtain a moisture content specimen Use full slice Record weights AHTD 348 Passing # 4 100 g min. Passing ¾ 500 g min. 104 52

Repeat compaction process for all points Compact points until there is no increase in the wet mass of soil and then perform one more determination At least 2 points over optimum are required ~ Except for non-cohesive drainable soils Points will increase in mass and then decrease in mass After which point could you stop compacting points? Target Wet Mass 10 % 4300 g 12 % 4380 g 14 % 4400 g 16 % 4360 g 18 % 4310 g Stop! 105 Curve Plot Points X - axis : % Moisture Y - axis : Dry Density Draw Curve Decide peak location Draw smooth parabola Dry Density (lbs/ft³) 120 110 100 10 12 14 16 % Moisture Record Peak Values Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Report Density & MC Max DD: nearest 0.1 lb/ft³ Opt. MC: nearest 0.1% 106 53

Curve Max. Dry Density (pcf) 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Moisture Content (%) 107 Peak Location by Graphing 127 Dry Density (pcf) 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 1 2 3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Moisture Content (%) 108 54

Peak Location by Graphing Dry Density (pcf) 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 DD Max = 126.2 @ 13.5% 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Moisture Content (%) 109 Practice Graphs 130.0 130.0 129.0 129.0 128.0 128.0 127.0 127.0 126.0 126.0 125.0 125.0 124.0 124.0 123.0 123.0 122.0 122.0 121.0 121.0 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 110 55

Practice Graphs 130.0 130.0 129.0 129.0 128.0 128.0 127.0 127.0 126.0 126.0 125.0 125.0 124.0 124.0 123.0 123.0 122.0 122.0 121.0 121.0 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 111 Practice Graphs 130.0 129.0 128.0 Add point close to optimum moisture content! 130.0 129.0 128.0 Add points to finish proctor! 127.0 127.0 126.0 126.0 125.0 125.0 124.0 124.0 123.0 122.0? 123.0 122.0 121.0 121.0 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 112 56

Practice Graphs 130.0 129.0 128.0 127.0 Fire the technician! 130.0 129.0 128.0 127.0 Use rules only with evenly spaced moisture contents! 126.0 126.0 125.0 125.0 124.0 124.0 123.0 123.0 122.0 122.0 121.0 121.0 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 120.0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 113 Peak Location by Graphing Dry Density (pcf) 140 135 130 125 120 115 DD Max = 126.5 @ 10.8% 1 2 3 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content (%) Remember, you must have evenly spaced moisture contents for this method! Never use straight lines through data points to establish peak! Peak values obtained by using straight lines are too high for maximum density. 114 57

Graphical Parabola Method 140 DD Max = 126.0 @ 10.8% Dry Density (pcf) 135 130 125 120 F K B J E C G Optimum MC is halfway between point A & H... % 115 A D H 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content (%) 115 Graphical Parabola Method 140 Dry Density (pcf) 135 130 125 120 DD Max = 126.0 @ 10.8% B C 115 A 8 9 10 11 12 13 Moisture Content (%) 116 58

Calibration of Measure AASHTO T 19 Section 8 Mold Volume 117 Clean and dry mold and base plate Place a thin layer of grease on upper and lower mold rims Assemble mold and base plate Weigh glass plate and mold assembly Mold Volume 118 59

Fill mold with water and cover with glass plate Eliminate bubbles and excess water Dry mold assembly and glass plate Weigh mold, water and glass plate Mold Volume 119 Measure temperature of water to nearest 1 F Determine the density of the water at the measured temperature AASHTO Table 3 ~ Interpolate Calculate the volume of the mold Mold Volume 120 60

Calculate volume of mold Report volume of mold to the nearest 0.0001 ft³ Mold Volume 121 Calculation Determine the volume of the mold Mold + Plate 2.426 lb Mold + Water + Plate 4.500 lb Temperature 76 F Density of Water @ 76 62.252 lb/ft³....... Mold Volume V = 0.0333 ft³ 122 61

Calculation Determine the volume of the mold Mold + Plate 15.248 lb Mold + Water + Plate 19.928 lb Temperature 68 F Mold Volume 123 Mold Volumes 4 Mold 0.0333 ± 0.0005 ft³ 0.000943 ± 0.0000014 m³ 6 Mold 0.0750 ± 0.0009 ft³ 0.002124 ± 0.000025 m³ Use mold volume determined by AASHTO T 19 for density calculations 124 62

Density Calculations % % % 125 Wet Density (WD) Density Calculations Convert units as needed ~ lb/ft³ ~ kg/m³ 126 63

Density Calculations Compute the wet density (lb/ft³) of a soil compacted in a 4 diameter mold with a volume of 0.0336 ft³ Mold Weight Mold + Soil 4454.0 g 6398.6 g 6398.6 g - 4454.0 g 1944.6 g 1) Find the wet weight of soil 2) Convert to pounds... / 3) Divide by volume.. / ³. ³ 127 Density Calculations Once WD is known, the dry density (DD) is calculated based on the MC of the soil cut from the compacted specimen % Determine the dry density of a soil having a WD of 127.589 lb/ft³ and MC of 12.2 %.. % %.... ³ 128 64

Sample Sample Data Mold Volume 0.0334 ft³ Empty Mold Wt (g) Mold + Soil Wt (g) 4475.0 6433.3 4475.0 6512.4 4475.0 6520.9 4475.0 6460.3 Soil Weight (g) Soil Weight (lb) Wet Density (lb/ft³) Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (lb/ft³) % 129 Sample Sample Data 122 121 120 Dry Density (pcf) 119 118 117 116 115 10 11 12 13 14 Moisture Content (%) 130 65

Adjustments An increase or decrease in the amount of rock in the field will change the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the soil Adjustments are only made when the change would not require a different proctor method to be run Field Indicators for Adjustments : High density tests (continuously without reason) Low density tests (continuously without reason) Visual noticeable change in soil gradation 131 Adjustments Adjusts the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of a soil to account for the coarse particles (rock) found in field conditions ARDOT Material Replacement Method (ARDOT) ~ Alters the way the proctor is run by substituting smaller rock which is allowed in the mold, for larger rock not allowed in the mold by the AASHTO method AASHTO Correction of Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture for Oversized Particles (AASHTO COP) ~ Mathematically corrects the established AASHTO proctor by using actual material properties and the percentages of soil and rock found in the field 132 66

Adjustments AASHTO Method A & B s AASHTO & ARDOT : If more than 5 % is retained on the # 4 sieve, run the AASHTO proctor and apply the AASHTO correction for oversized particles on # 4 sieve AASHTO Method C & D s AASHTO : If more than 5 % is retained on the ¾ sieve, run the AASHTO proctor and apply the AASHTO correction for oversized particles on ¾ sieve AHTD : If material is retained on the ¾ sieve, use the ARDOT material replacement method when running the AASHTO proctor 133 Adjustments What proctor should be performed for the soil with the following gradation? Sieve % Passing 2 100 3/4 100 # 4 96 # 200 15 AASHTO T 99 A What proctor should be performed for the soil with the following gradation? Sieve % Passing 2 100 3/4 100 # 4 64 # 200 8.7 AASHTO T 180 D 134 67

Adjustments What proctor should be performed for the soil with the following gradation? Sieve % Passing 2 100 3/4 100 # 4 93 # 200 13 What proctor should be performed for the soil with the following gradation? Sieve % Passing 2 100 3/4 92 # 4 77 # 200 10 AASHTO T 99 A with AASHTO COP AASHTO T 99 C with ARDOT 135 ARDOT Material Replacement Sieve % Passing Ignore % Ret. on 2 Sieve Material Replacement 2 2 3/4 3/4 38 % # 4 # 4 60 % 136 68

ARDOT Material Replacement Batching 5500 g / Point 98 % of material passes 2 sieve 38 % of (3/4 - # 4) Rock is needed for each point.. 60 % of (minus # 4) Soil is needed for each point. 2133 Rock + 3367 Soil 5500 Point 137 AASHTO Correction for Oversized Particles Run Bulk Specific Gravity (G sb ) of Rock G sb = 2.588 Run AASHTO T 99 A ~ AASHTO COP Max. DD = 116.6 pcf Opt. MC = 14.2 % Calculate corrected proctor value and optimum moisture content Worksheet 138 69

AASHTO Correction for Oversized Particles Compacted Laboratory Dry Density Corrected to Field Dry Density (P C ) % Coarse Material (0.1) (field) 7.4 (P F ) % Fine Material (0.1) 100 - (P C ) 92.6 (MC C ) Moisture Content of Coarse Material (assume 2%) 2.0 (MC F ) Moisture Content of Fine Material (proctor) 14.2 (MC T ) Corrected Total Moisture Content 13.3% (D F ) Dry Density of Fine Material (proctor) 116.6 Gsb Bulk Specific Gravity of Coarse Mat. (lab test) 2.588 (k) Unit Weight of Coarse Material Gsb x 62.4 = 2.588 x 62.4 161.491 (Dd) Corrected Total Dry Density 119.0 pcf 139 In-Place Density and Moisture Content of Soil by Nuclear Methods AASHTO T 310 Density Gauge 140 70

Nuclear Densometer Apparatus Extraction Tool Drill Rod Scraper Plate Reference Standard Density Gauge 141 Density Gauge Direct Measurements Wet Density Moisture Content Calculated Values Dry Density 1 100 % % % Compaction 100 % Density Gauge 142 71

Modes of Operation Direct Transmission ~ Measures the density of the material between the source and the surface Density Gauge Backscatter ~ Measures the density of the material close to the surface (80% in top 2 ) Density Gauge 143 Wet Density Measurement Density Gauge Source - Cesium 137 ~ Gamma Photons Direct Transmission Detectors ~ Geiger Mueller Measurement ~ The higher the density of a material, the lower the count values SOURCE Cs 137 Density Gauge 144 72

Moisture Measurement Source Am 241: BE 9 ~ Neutrons Detectors ~ Helium 3 Measurement ~ Neutrons are slowed by collisions with hydrogen ~ Measurement depth is a function of the moisture content (unknown) Density Gauge Density Gauge 145 Calibration Radioactive Sources Aging changes the relationship between count rates and gauge outputs Source Rod Positions SAFE POSITION INDEX TRIGGER BACKSCATTER POSITION 2 in. Calibration Initially 24 months ~ Or yearly verification SOURCE ROD INDEX ROD DIRECT TRANSMISSION POSITIONS 12 in. Density Gauge 146 73

Troxler 3430 Keypad (READY) 1 min Depth : 4 inches ON YES MA PR STD SPECIAL OFF NO TIME DEPTH START ENTER Density Gauge 147 Standard Count Adjusts for source decay and background radiation Used daily to determine the proper functioning of gauge Site Selection Concrete or Asphalt 10 from large objects 30 from any other radioactive sources Run Standard Count Place gauge on Standard Block Rod in Safe position Press <Standard> Density Gauge Standard Block Safe Position Metal Butt Plate 148 74

Standard Count Determine Compliance Use procedure recommended by the gauge manufacturer If none given by manufacturer, use 1.96 / ~ Ns = new standard count ~ No = average of last 4 standard counts ~ F = pre-scale factor Troxler, Humbolt, InstroTek, & CPN Gauges require : ± 1 % Density ± 2 % Moisture From the average of the last 4 standard counts taken Density Gauge 149 Standard Count Compliance Ratio Method Average last 4 counts Date DS MS May 5 th 2251 650 May 6 th 2260 642 May 7 th 2258 645 May 8 th 2262 648 Average 2258 646 Take new standard New Counts 2234 638 Determine Ratios Density (± 1 %) Ratio Range = 0.99 1.01 F ~ 2234 / 2258 = 0.9893 ~ 2258 / 2234 = 1.0107 Moisture (± 2 %) Ratio Range = 0.98 1.02 ~ 638 / 646 = 0.9876 ~ 646 / 638 = 1.0125 P Determine Pass/Fail Fails Both must pass Density Gauge 150 75

Standard Count Compliance Range Method Average last 4 counts Date DS MS May 5 th 2251 650 May 6 th 2260 642 May 7 th 2258 645 May 8 th 2262 648 Average 2258 646 Determine Ranges Density (± 1 %) F 2258 x 0.01 = ± 22 ~ 2258-2234 = 24 Moisture (± 2 %) 646 x 0.02 = ± 12 ~ 646-638 = 8 P Take new standard New Counts 2234 638 Determine Pass/Fail Fails Both must pass Density Gauge 151 Standard Count Compliance Average last 4 counts Date DS MS May 10 th 2275 588 May 12 th 2260 551 May 13 th 2265 565 May 15 th 2262 556 Determine if the new density and moisture standard counts pass or fail New Standard 2246 575 Density Gauge 152 76

Standard Count Compliance Failing Standard Counts 1. Re-run standard count ~ Check set-up 2. Establish a new average ~ Run 4 new standard counts Gauge Drift Best Practice Max. Deviation DS = 25 Max Deviation MS = 12 ~ Run new standard count and compare to new average Pass Proceed to testing Fail Repair gauge Density Gauge 153 Standard Count Compliance Passing Standard Counts Proceed to testing Density Gauge 154 77

Prepare Surface Remove any dry or loose materials Smooth and level soil surface Fill any voids with native fines or sand ~ No more than 10% of footprint should be filled ~ Filler pad thickness should not exceed 1/8 in depth Density Gauge 155 Determine Test Depth Equal to lift thickness ~ Test Depth is to be entered into gauge ~ Test Depth is the depth the rod should be extended to Test depth should never exceed lift thickness 8 in. Test Depth = 8 inches 10 in. Density Gauge 156 78

Drill Hole Hole should be at least 2 inches deeper than test depth Pin markings include the extra 2 required 2 1 st Ring 12 10 8 6 4 2 2 + Extra 2 Density Gauge 157 Drill Hole Place scraper plate on prepared test site Attach extraction tool and insert drill rod Step firmly on center of plate and hammer drill rod at least 2 deeper than test depth ~ Perpendicular to surface Density Gauge 158 79

Remove drill rod with an upward, twisting motion Mark plate footprint and hole location Remove tools from area 3 ft away Density Gauge 159 Check gauge parameters Depth (lift thickness) Time (1 minute) Max. Density (proctor) Place gauge in footprint Align rod with hole marks Lower rod to test depth Snug gauge back against hole Check contact with soil Density Gauge 160 80

Snug gauge back against hole Check contact with soil Start Test Push Move away from gauge 3 feet Density Gauge 161 Safe Rod Record Data Wet Density Dry Density % Compaction % Moisture Location Error Sources! Source rod not clicked into position Depth set incorrectly Gaps under gauge after rod insertion External causes ~ Ground Vibration ~ Drainage structures ~ Power lines Density Gauge 162 81

What s wrong? Density Gauge 163 What s wrong? Density Gauge 164 82

ARDOT Specifications ARDOT specification limits are considered absolute limits! Observed or calculated values are not rounded for determination of compliance ~ Compared directly with the limit ~ Average values are rounded to the same # of significant digits Any deviation outside limits is non-compliance ~ Failing test % Compaction 165 ARDOT Specifications Density Specifications Embankment Subgrade Base Aggregate 95 % Compaction 95 % Compaction 98 % Compaction Moisture Specification ARDOT Moisture At or near opt. moisture % Compaction 166 83

% Compaction Correct proctor value was active in the gauge at the time of testing and true moisture content returned by the gauge % % value was not available at the time of testing % % % % Compaction 167 Calculation Determine the % compaction Gauge DD 113.0 lb/ft³ @ 12.4 % 115.9 lb/ft³ @ 14.0 % % %.. % %. %. % % PR = 97.5 % % Compaction 168 84

Calculation Determine the % compaction Gauge DD 135.6 lb/ft³ @ 6.3 % 138.0 lb/ft³ @ 6.5 % % Compaction 169 Calculation Determine the % compaction and if the site meets the required specifications Test DD MC Gauge (8 % Coarse) 114.0 pcf 12.5 % (0% Coarse) 116.0 pcf 14.0 % (8% Coarse) 119.3 pcf 13.0 % Specifications 98 % ± 1 % %.. %. %. % Fails Density Passes Moisture Density Gauge 170 85

Moisture Offset Corrects the gauge s inaccurate moisture content readings due to substances found in the soil Cement, Gypsum, Coal, Lime (- correction) ~ High Hydrogen Forms Boron, Cadmium, Chlorine (+ correction) ~ Neutron Absorbing Take gauge MC readings at 5 different locations Collect moisture samples from center of footprint at each location Run oven dry moisture contents Compute moisture offset according to the gauge manufacturer s recommendations Density Gauge 171 Trench Offset Corrects moisture and shallow density readings Use anytime gauge is within 2 feet of a vertical soil structure 2 ft Take a normal standard count outside trench Put gauge on standard block inside trench Take a four minute reading with the rod in the safe position Record trench counts Offset = Trench - Standard Density Gauge 172 86

ARDOT Specifications Base Aggregate Test Quantities ~ Contractor - 1000 tons ~ AHTD - 4000 tons Tests for QC ~ Gradation ~ Density & Moisture ~ Plasticity Index ~ Thickness if Specified Sounding Compacted Embankment Test Quantity ~ 3000 yd³ / 1 per lift min. Tests for QC ~ Density & Moisture Granular Borrow Additional Tests for QC ~ Gradation ~ Plasticity Index ARDOT Specifications 173 87