TERRELL H. HOLDER Kentucky State University

Similar documents
The Status of Alabama Agriculture

Economic Contribution of Idaho Agribusiness

Chapter 9. Fruits and Vegetables Bradley J. Rickard, Assistant Professor Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management

CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE HIGHLIGHTS New York State, 1997

FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS for the Lower Rio Grande Valley

AGRICULTURAL OVERVIEW

Agriculture in Hokkaido Japan. January 2018 Department of Agriculture Hokkaido Government

Rural NYS Agriculture Prof. Anthony Grande

VOF 100% Grass Fed Guidelines

regon Agricultural Commodities

Organic Crop Production: Crop Rotation

Animal-based agriculture Vs. Plant-based agriculture. A multi-product data comparison. [CURRENT DATA] March 22, 2017

Agriculture and Food Processing in Washington State Economic Impacts and Importance of Water

Michigan and Ohio Specialty Crops Growers Study

Global Minor-Use Summit

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

Producer price index 1998/99 to 2002/03 (July to June) / / / / /03 Year

An optimization approach to assessing the self-sustainability potential of food demand in the Midwestern United States

Organic Foods: Understanding Organic Food Labels, Benefits, and Claims

Agriculture in Bulgaria

Incorporating Elements of Choice and Transitioning to a Choice Pantry

Whole Soil Fertility Step-by-Step

Current Status of Organic Agriculture in Washington State:

Alameda County Eligibility Requirements for Williamson Act Contracts for Agricultural Uses GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE

Time to rethink the food systems for a sustainable diet. Martine Padilla CIHEAM-IAMM/UMR MOISA

SOUTH AFRICA - Agricultural Survey Main Results

MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION

Economic Impact of Local Food Producers in Central Oregon

China at a Glance. A Statistical Overview of China s Food and Agriculture. Fred Gale

Impact of the 2012 Drought on Field Crops and Cattle Production in Arkansas Preliminary Report

Exhibit 3.2 Missouri Acreage Used to Harvest Vegetables for Sale, 1997 to ,404 21,804 20,213

NAFTA At 11: Impact on the California Fresh Produce Industry

Farm Labor. Special Note

THE IMPORTANCE OF AGRIBUSINESS TO THE BI-STATE ECONOMY. Prepared by the St. Louis Agribusiness Club January 2010

Cornell Cropware Version 2 Quicksheet Important Installation Instructions:

Environmental Sustainability, Food Security and Animal Food Production: Milk and Dairy as a Case Study

Organic fruit and vegetable production: Is it for you?

IS LOCAL ENOUGH? SOME ARGUMENTS FOR REGIONAL FOOD SYSTEMS

Planting and Harvesting Crops

VegNet Vol. 14, No. 20. July 16, 2007 Ohio State University Extension Vegetable Crops On the WEB at: In This Issue 1.

Agriculture in China - Successes, Challenges, and Prospects. Prof. Zhihao Zheng College of Economics & Management China Agricultural University

CAN REGIONAL, ORGANIC AGRICULTURE FEED THE REGIONAL COMMUNITY? A Case Study for Hamburg and North Germany

Diversifying Your Income Streams

Variability of the global warming potential and energy demand of Swiss cheese

Climate, soils and the advantages of North East Tasmania for irrigated agriculture

Future U.S. Agricultural Production at Stake: The Challenge of Agricultural Producer Transition

ANIMAL RAISING CLAIM FRAMEWORK FOR BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN AUSTRALIA

Nitrogen Mass Flow in China s Animal Production System and Environmental Implications

Executive Summary. Fruits and Berries

Data entry number. Session 7 Agro-Input Dealers - Handout Page

CHAPTER 3 THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY IN GENESEE COUNTY

Food Price Outlook,

CENSUS OF AGRICULTURAL HIGHLIGHTS New York State, 1987

Cover Crops Grow Your Own Fertilizer

Economic catalogue for agricultural products Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development

Emerging Global Trade Patterns: USDA s Long-term Agricultural Projections

Food Consumption Pattern - Rural and Urban Kenya

THUNDER BAY + AREA FOOD + AGRICULTURE MARKET STUDY SECTION FOOD DISTRIBUTORS

Sreedhar Patil 5/30/2013

CERES Trust Final Report. Project: Edible Grain Legumes for Organic Cropping Systems

Botetourt County Agriculture Strategic Plan. November 24, 2015

Adding Imports to Producer Price Measures for Food By Alberto Jerardo

Profile of organic crops in Oregon 2008

The Proposed Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR) Information Session

Role of NAFTA in California Agriculture: a Brief Review*

Poultry in the Chesapeake Bay Program s Phase 6 Watershed Model

How Do We Face Rising Food Prices

Name(s) (1) that most food is produced by burning fossil fuels?

PRODUCT CENTER For Agriculture and Natural Resources Room 80 Agriculture Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (517)

Key messages of chapter 3

Characteristics of beef cattle operations in the West. C. Alan Rotz,* Senorpe Asem-Hiablie,* Robert Stout,* and Kathleen Fisher

Agriculture s Contribution to New Mexico s Economy

Increasing the share of domestic grain legumes in human diets benefits for cropping and food system sustainability

Overview of the NASS Nuts and Pecan Estimating Program. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service New Orleans, LA February 18, 2011

Forage Market in the Southern US. Presented By: Alexander Christensen President Southeast Hay Distributors, Inc. West Palm Beach, Florida USA

The Vermont Dairy Farm Sustainability Project, Inc.

Feedlot Nutrition for Holsteins

Forage production and use in the dairy farming systems of Northern Italy

John Deere. Committed to Those Linked to the Land. Market Fundamentals. Deere & Company June/July 2014

Henderson County Agriculture News & Events

RETUR COSTS A 8 R R. and 96 LI6R R

SMALL FARMING HALT Course Syllabus. Rene McCracken-Instructor

Demographics. Health Statistics

Animal Protein Production Impacts and Trends Dr. Judith L. Capper

3/25/2017. What to do today? Cattle & Beef Markets: Commodity Outlook

Poultry production is the number one agricultural

Mississippi Department of Agriculture & Commerce Cindy Hyde-Smith, Commissioner

Oldways Common Ground. Environmental Issues. Malden Nesheim, Cornell University

Hop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:

A European Food Prices Monitoring Tool

Guidelines for Application, Classification and Assessment of Land Eligible To Be Assessed At Use Value

THE FARM BILL AND THE WESTERN HAY INDUSTRY. Daniel A. Sumner and William Matthews 1

MONTHLY MARKET INFORMATION REPORT: VEGETABLES

Demand vs Supply of Food in India - Futuristic Projection

Precision Agriculture and the Future of Farming in Europe

Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com

Vegetables and Specialties

Local Food Market Analysis

Transcription:

TERRELL H. HOLDER Kentucky State University

Complete Diets Crop Yields Annual Per Capita Intake Per Capita Production Requirement Available Agricultural Land in Each Ecoregion 2010 Census Data

Two Complete Diets Diet 1 Vegetarian with Dairy Products Diet 2 8 oz Meat & Eggs per day with Dairy Products Basket of 41 food commodities 2,300 Kcal per day Commodities can be produced in Kentucky Some fresh & some preserved Both diets meet USDA My Plate Daily Serving Recommendations

Two Complete Diets Daily servings Diet 1 (Veg) Diet 2 (Meat) Grains 7 Vegetables 4 Fruit 4 Dairy 3 Pulses & Nuts 5 Grains 7 Vegetables 4 Fruit 4 Dairy 3 Pulses & Nuts 2.5 Meat 7 Eggs 0.5

Crop Yields Hierarchy of methods 1. Three year average USDA publications for KY 2. Three year average USDA publications from neighboring states 3. Other publications from KY sources 4. UK Crop budgets 5. Market garden approach Commodity Yield (lbs acre -1 ) Corn (for grain) 7,392 Snap Beans 6,000 Wheat 3,880 Cucumber 11,250 Sorghum (syrup) 1,746

Annual Per Capita Intake Daily ration best thought of as a stew. Daily ration for each food is calculated based on the number of servings and weighted by preference within each food group. Daily ration of each commodity * 365 = Annual Intake Sample from other vegetables food group : Commodity 1 Serving Size (g) Energy/serving (Kcal) Preference Energy serving Weighted (Kcal ) BROCCOLI 46 15.5 8.5 1.3 CABBAGE 45 11.1 4.7 0.5 CAULIFLOWER 54 13.4 2.0 0.3 CUCUMBER 52 7.8 7.1 0.6 EGGPLANT 50 17.3 1.2 0.2 ONIONS 105 46.2 12.4 5.7 PEPPERS 75 14.9 5.1 0.8 SNAP BEANS 63 21.9 8.7 1.9 BEETS 85 37.4 0.9 0.3 TOMATOES 90 16.2 49.4 8.0 100 19.6 1. USDA Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 4.1 (2010)

Annual Per Capita Intake Diet 1 (Vegetarian) Annual Intake = 663 kg Diet 2 (Meat) Annual Intake = 707 kg

Total Per Capita Food Production Requirement Annual intake * Loss Conversion Factor / YPUW = Gross Production Required Loss conversion factor considers: Food service and consumer loss Inedible portion Cooking loss Retail loss Yield per Unit Weight of Farm Commodity Milk = 100% Beef = 44% Wheat = 86% Range from 1.16 to 2.16 Range from 100% to 18%

Total Per Capita Food Production Requirement Sample loss conversion data: Commodity Annual Intake (g) Loss Conversion Factor Yield / Unit Weight of Farm Commodity Gross Per Capita Production Required (g) Broccoli, Fresh 932 1.79 1.00 1,668 Wheat 44,866 1.22 0.86 63,647 Beef, Regular 7,223 1.24 0.44 20,354 Cucumber, Fresh 889 1.67 1.00 1,485 Snap Beans, Fresh 1310 1.54 1.00 2,017 Sweet Corn, Fresh 4052 2.16 1.00 8,753 Tomatoes, Fresh 10710 1.56 1.00 16,708

Total Per Capita Food Production Requirement Diet 1 Vegetarian with Dairy Products Diet 2 8 oz Meat & Eggs per day with Dairy Products Annual Intake = 663 kg Loss Adjusted Production Required = 964 kg Annual Intake = 707 kg Loss Adjusted Production Required = 1,188 kg

Available Agricultural Land for each Ecoregion Land aggregated into three agricultural categories Land suitable for all crops Land suitable for perennial crops and hay only Land suitable for pasture only Model applied using two data sources: Land cover data from USDA-NASS, Cropland Data Layers 2008-2010 1 Soil classification data from SSURGO Thematic Soil Data Layer with Land Capability Class 2 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Research and Development Division, Geospatial Information Branch, Spatial Analysis Research Section (SARS) 2011. URL: http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov 2. Kentucky Division of Geographic Information. USDA/NRCS May, 2005 URL: http://kygisserver.ky.gov/arcgis/services

2010 Census Census 2010. Kentucky Summary File 1. Data files and shapefiles Census blocks clipped to ecoregions 1. Census.gov, Summary File 1, Kentucky (2010). http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/04-summary_file_1/kentucky/

Millions Population of Kentucky Ecoregions, Census 2010 2.50 2.437 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.622 0.50 0.373 0.360 0.136 0.232 0.157 0.00 68 69 70 71ne 71sw 72 73 74 Ecoregion 0.001

Annual Agricultural Land Requirement Per Capita Potential Agricultural Land in Each Ecoregion Human Carrying Capacity in Each Ecoregion Net Importing and Exporting Ecoregions

Annual Per Capita Land Requirement Vegetarian Diet a h p Total (acres) 0.266 0.058 0.135 0.459 Omnivorous Diet a h p Total (acres) 0.611 0.329 0.502 1.442 A per capita = Where Q = Annual Intake, L = Loss Conversion Factor, Y= Yield, i = plant commodity, R = Animal Feed Requirements, j = animal product, k = feed ingredient. Summary Equation after Peters, et al, (2005)

Acres Millions Current agricultural land use, by category, in Kentucky ecoregions (Derived from NASS Cropland Data Layers). 2.50 2.00 1.50 All Crops Perennial Crops 1.00 Pasture 0.50 0.00 68 69 70 71ne 71sw 72 73 74 Ecoregion

Potential agricultural land, by category, in Kentucky ecoregions (Derived from NRCS Soil Thematic Data Layer). Acres Millions 2.00 1.50 1.00 All Crops Perennial Crops Pasture 0.50 0.00 68 69 70 71ne 71sw 72 73 74 Ecoregion

Carrying Capacity (K) A conditional function was used to determine which land category was the limiting resource and calculate K. K = Summary equation after Peters, et al. (2005)

Agricultural land base and Annual per capita land requirement Is best quality land the limiting resource? Yes Carrying capacity is determined by the area of best quality land. No Is pasture land the limiting resource? Yes Carrying capacity is determined by the total area of land available. No Carrying capacity is limited by the area of land suitable for perennial crops and hay.

Millions Population (red dots) and carrying capacity (K) of Kentucky ecoregions, assuming modeled vegetarian or omnivorous diets (Diet 1 & 2, respectively) grown on currently used agricultural land (USDA-NASS Cropland Data layers, 2008-10). 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 K Diet 1 1.50 K Diet 2 Population 2010 1.00 0.50 0.00 68 69 70 71ne 71sw 72 73 74 Ecoregions

Importing and Exporting Ecoregions Current Land Use (Both Diets) Food Exporting Regions Food Importing Regions

Millions Population (red dots) and carrying capacity (K) of Kentucky ecoregions, assuming modeled vegetarian or omnivorous diets (Diet 1 & 2, respectively) grown on all land with agricultural potential (USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. Part 22.02). 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 K Diet 1 K Diet 2 Population 2010 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 68 69 70 71ne 71sw 72 73 74 Ecoregions

Importing and Exporting Ecoregions All potential land (Vegetarian Diet) Exporting Regions Importing Regions Marginal Regions

Importing and Exporting Ecoregions All Potential Land (Omnivorous Diet) Level III Ecological Regions of Kentucky Exporting Regions Importing Regions Marginal Regions Interior Plateau North East (71NE) Western Allegheny Plateau (70) Mississippi Valley Loess Plains (74) Interior River Valleys and Hills (72) Interior Plateau South West (71SW) Southwestern Appalachians (68) Central Appalachians (69) Mississippi Valley Alluvial Plain (72)

Importing and Exporting Ecoregions All Potential Land (Omnivorous Diet) Optimistic model design Meat diet requires more land Land conservation priority Ecoregional context Local food as interregional exchange

Questions? Acknowledgements KYSU and MES staff Dr. Michael Bomford Ken Bates Dr. Demetrio Zurakis