IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION

Similar documents
MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

29 th Annual BIC Bull Sale

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle

A COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE. D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Introduction to Indexes

TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

Round Table Discussion. Does the Seedstock Industry Focus on the Needs of the Commercial Cow/Calf Producer?

UNDERSTANDING & USING GENEMAX FOCUS TM

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

Crossbreeding Systems in Beef Cattle 1

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

Beef Performance Testing: Questions and Answers

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Production Records for Cow/Calf Producers Sandy Johnson, Beef specialist Bob Weaber, Cow/calf specialist

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

Background and Assumptions

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Can Selection Indexes Improve Profitability in Beef Cattle

TECHNICAL BULLETIN GENEMAX FOCUS - EVALUATION OF GROWTH & GRADE FOR COMMERCIAL USERS OF ANGUS GENETICS. November 2016

2007 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

PRODUCTION PLAN. Crop Production

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency

Upper Midwest Devon Cattle Workshop & Sale

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

COW/CALF DAYS 2015 NICOLE KENNEY-RAMBO

Marketing Cull Cows How & When?

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Heifer Management to Make Successful Cows

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

CROSSBREEDING STRATEGIES: INCLUDING TERMINAL VS. MATERNAL CROSSES

Throughout this manual, the goal has been to improve the

Local Genetic Adaptation in Beef Cattle Jared Decker Assistant Professor Beef Genetics Specialist Computational Genomics

Beef Improvement New Zealand Inc.

Guidelines for Estimating. Bison Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

ONTHLY BEEF MANAGEMENT CALENDAR & WORKBOOK

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

User Manual - Custom Finish Cattle Profit Projection

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2016

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2008 On Selected WISONSIN DAIRY FARMS

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

Determining the costs and revenues for dairy cattle

A Method for Determining Ranch Profit Probabilities When Livestock Yields Are Normally Distributed

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIV November 17, 18 and 19, 2015, Loveland, Colorado HOW TO USE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE GENOMIC PREDICTIONS

PROJECTING CASH FLOWS ON DAIRY FARMS

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2009 on Selected WISONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Benchmarking To Increase Beef Cow Profits

Telephone: (706) Animal and Dairy Science Department Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science

Wagyu 101. Michael Scott Certified Executive Chef Academy of Chefs Corporate Chef for Rosewood Ranches Texas Raised Wagyu Beef

Matching Beef Genetics with Production Environment

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

Animal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING

1 This research was conducted under cooperative agreements between USDA, ARS, Montana Agric. Exp.

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms - Case Studies of Texas High Plain Agriculture. Diana Jones Dustin Gaskins Jay Yates

Evaluating Preconditioning Profitability - Projection and Closeout Manual

Pasture Passages. Sydney Hayter. From The Agent s Desk. Issue 2 Jacksonville, FL January/February 2015

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

Beef Cattle Research Update

RETUR COSTS A 8 R R. and 96 LI6R R

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Crossbreeding Back to the Future David A. Daley California State University, Chico

What s Driving Dairy Profitability. Greg Bethard, Ph.D. GPS Dairy Consulting, LLC Blacksburg, VA

Diversifying Your Income Streams

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Beef Cattle Handbook

Transcription:

IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION Timothy D. Hewitt and John Holt North Florida Research and Education Center University of Florida, Marianna; and Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville The beef cattle industry in Florida continues to be an important segment of agricultural production. Florida continues to be the leading state in the Southeast in terms of beef cattle production and ranks number ten nationally in cow numbers. The first stage of beef production is cow-calf production which is important throughout Florida. This stage involves the production of a weaned8 calf which is conducted by cow-calf operators who breed cows to produce calves. Profit margins are often tight for beef producers in Florida. Important management decisions must be made every day. Often the decisions made by the prudent farm manager may result in the difference between a profit or loss for the year. The manager must be aware of the different options available to him to improve the financial well-being of the cattle enterprise. In beef cattle production, daily management decisions include all aspects of pasturing including when and how much to fertilize, weaning, marketing, and breeding stock selection. An important economic decision that has the potential to affect the profitability of a cow-calf enterprise is breeding stock selection. Selecting breeding stock is very important because many of the traits of the sire and dam can be passed on to the offspring. A sire and a dam are essentially of equal importance in determining the inheritance of a single offspring. Their relative importance in a herd is determined by the number of progeny that each parent produces. Therefore, sire selection is the most important factor affecting the herd level. Recognizing the importance of individual sires to overall herd merit, a breeder should carefully consider both a bull's soundness and his records prior to final selection. Most characteristics of economic importance in beef cattle are controlled by many genes and the same traits are often greatly influenced by environment. Thus, management is a very critical factor in developing the traits that are being selected for breeding stock. A suitable environment has to be maintained for the better genotypes to have a chance to express themselves. Selection is carried on for a variety of traits. For most farm animals selection is directed toward improving the usefulness of the herd. One central idea serves as a guide to all selection regardless of what trait or class of animal is being subjected to selection and that is a belief that selection will be effective in producing the results for which the producer (breeder) is striving. However, the degree to which people believe selection to be effective may vary widely. Heritability estimates are very important in selecting breeding stock. Heritability gives us an estimate of what we can hope to receive by selection. Heritability estimates are based on the varieties in a particular trait at a particular time and under particular conditions. The information in Table 1 shows some actual heritability estimates for various characteristics of beef cattle. Many selection factors can improve the overall financial situation of a cow-calf operation. The decision to purchase beef herd breeding

stock requires close scrutiny by ranchers, because in addition to direct costs and resources that may be affected, financial aspects such as income taxes and leverage may also be affected. Great variation exists in the criteria used by cattlemen in selecting breeding stock. Performance testing information is often used that gives some idea on the production potential of the cows and the bull. Of course the quality of the management supplied (environmental factors) is also important in deciding what to purchase and how much to pay for breeding stock. A number of traits may be considered in breeding stock selection. The emphasis placed on each trait should be determined by the heritability and the individual need for selection pressure for a particular trait. Breeders must have some knowledge of the heritability estimates for traits similar to those in Table 1. Many breeders tend to select for too many traits without regard to heritability. Types of traits that ranchers may be concerned with include: birth weight weaning weight calving assistance cow maternal ability pasture gain efficiency of gain carcass merit Breeding stock that will improve the herd is worth much more than breeding stock that is similar to the average of the herd. Prudent cattle producers need to manage their cow herd very closely and make wise decisions. All relevant information should be collected and researched. In terms of seed stock selection, some heritable traits are economically important both for the sire and the brood cows. Since the bull will be responsible for many more offspring during a given season, that selection is extremely important. Various tests have shown that the most important factors to consider in breeding stock selection from production records are: 1. weaning weight 2. yearling weight 3. birth weight 4. maternal performance 5. gain efficiency 6. scrotal circumference Time spent on seed stock selection has the potential to yield extra income for the ranch. Sire selection is the most important factor affecting the overall herd performance. Producers need to be aware of the important economic factors in cow production and in breeding stock selection. Management ideas that will assist producers in making decisions include: - maintaining up-to-date herd records - keep a good identification system for all cattle - look at performance record - use progeny records to select and cull - determine herd contributions by using expected progeny differences (EPD's) if available and understood - conformation scores should be considered - structural soundness is a factor - carefully evaluate the number of years to retain bulls - select for traits of economic importance - analyze the potential economic benefits COW-CALF EXAMPLE To illustrate how breeding stock may improve the economic situation for cow-calf operators some information and examples have been developed. A cow-calf budget is show in Table 2 that estimates the costs for a 100-cow cow-calf enterprise. In this budget costs are almost $24,000 per year to produce 90 calves. The costs include the typical variable expense items such as fertilizer, lime, and vet and medicine expenses, and overhead costs. The information in Table 3 shows break-even prices per hundred weight of calves sold at three different weaning weights. The higher the weaning weights the lower the price required to breakeven. This information clearly illustrates that increases in performance in a cow-calf

operation may improve the overall economic situation of the enterprise. To go one step further the information in Table 4 shows what the differences in income would be for the operation at an assumed price of $.75 per pound. An increase of $6,000 or $75 per calf sold is realized with an increase in average weaning weight of 100 pounds. Another example to illustrate the economic importance of selection follows. Suppose the rancher has the data from the performance tests of two bulls. In observing their weight per day of age, Bull A has gained.6 pound per day faster than Bull B. To determine the actual advantage of gain the following computation is needed..6 pounds x.6 (heritability estimate for weight per day of age).36 divided by 2 (for sire affect only).18 pounds per day advantage If we assume a price of $78 per pound for 23 calves from the bull the following computation shows that Bull A has a $581 income potential advantage over Bull B. 180 days at weaning x.18 (extra weight advantage) 32.4 additional weaning weight x 23 calves 745.2 additional pounds x.78 price per pound of calves $581.25 additional income advantage Information such as the above is important when selecting breeding stock. In this example, for a 100 cow herd the total impact on the herd would be an additional $2,324 (4 x $581) for the first year by selecting the better bulls. Remember this is only looking at the advantage for one year and in reality cattle producers would need to determine the differences for the number of years they would keep the breeding stock. Of course any type of economic analysis would have to consider the time value of money. A dollar today may not be worth one dollar at some future date. Thus, when projecting long term effects putting all dollar amounts in present value (today's dollars) form would be necessary. Weaning weight is only one trait that may improve the economic situation of the cow operation. All the traits that are improved should be summed up when deciding what to buy to improve the herd. Obviously a bull with good performance data or progeny data (if available) is worth more than an "average" type of bull. The same may be said for all breeding stock. A goal of ranchers should be to improve their herd. The numbers will clearly show that herd improvement pays. When figuring how to improve the herd and how much to spend, performance data and knowing the heritability of traits are important. As part of the planning process, ranchers should put the pencil to anticipated changes. The financial well-being of a cow operation will often depend on wise decisions by the manager. Producers tend to improve their herds when the good times are rolling. The cattle market does directly affect what a bull on any type of breeding stock will bring. If the ranchers expect prices to be up in the future, he will usually pay more for breeding stock. Still constant herd improvement should be a goal for ranchers. Decision making should include an economic analysis of the charge. Payoffs do exist for careful seedstock selection. A bull may really be worth what he will bring. REFERENCES Castle, Emory N., Manning H. Becker, and A. Gene Nelson. Farm Business Management. MacMillian Publishing, New York, 1987. Clary, G.M., J.W. Jordan, and C. E. Thompson. "Economics of Purchasing Genetically Superior Beef Bulls." Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2, December 1984, pp. 31-36. Gregory, W.E. "Beef Cattle Breeding." USDA Agricultural Information Bulletin No.286, Washington, D.C., 1969.

Holt, John. "What Is A Bull Really Worth." The Florida Cattleman, Vol. 47, No. 10, July 1983, pp. 42, 44. Winters, L. M. Animal Breeding. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1954. Table 1. Heritability Estimates of Traits in Beef Cattle Birth weight Weaning weight Feed lot gain Efficiency of gain Final feed lot weight Cow maternal ability Carcass grade Trait Heritability per cwt. 40 30 45 45 60 40 35

Table 2. Estimated 1992 Costs for Southern Cow-Calf Enterprise (100 Cow Unit on 200 Acres, 90% Calf Crop, Spring Calving a ) Fertilizer (10-10-10 200 lbs./ac.) Nitrogen (40 lbs./ac.) Lime (1/3 ton/ac.) Hay (1 ton/cow unit) Soybean meal (125 lb./cow) Salt & minerals ($3.50/cow unit) Vet. & medicine ($8/cow unit) Maintenance, repairs & fuel Interest on (8 mos.) oper. cap. Item Quantity Price Cost/100 head 400 cwt 8,000 lb 66.7 ton 100 ton 125 ton $17,026 -- Dollars -- 6.80/cwt.26/lb 24/ton 70/ton 13/cwt 8% -- Dollars -- 2,720 2,080 1,601 7,000 1,625 350 800 850 1,362 Total cash costs 18,388 Less salvage value of 15 cull cows (950 lb.) @.50 lb. 14,250 lb 7,125 Net cash costs 11,263 Overhead (depr., interest on inv., taxes & ins.) Labor (6 hrs./cow at $4.50/hr.) Management (1/5 time, $2 per yr.) Total all costs 23,963 a 100-cow unit is 100 brood cows, 20 replacement heifers and 4 bulls.

Table 3. Estimated 1992 Break-Even Prices for Southern Cow-Calf Enterprise on 200 Acres Break-even prices per cwt. of calf sold Item Total amount Price per cwt. Weaning weight: 450 pounds Net cash costs Overhead Labor Management charge costs Total all costs Weaning weight: 500 pounds Net cash costs Overhead Labor Management charge costs Total all costs Weaning weight: 550 pounds Net cash costs Overhead Labor Management charge costs Total all costs 11,763 23,963 11,363 23,963 11,263 23,963 31.29 13.89 7.50 13.89 66.57 28.16 12.50 6.75 12.50 59.91 25.60 11.36 6.14 11.36 54.46 Table 4. Estimated Revenue for a Southern Cow-Calf Enterprise of 100 Cows Weaning weights Revenue a a 450 500 550 80 calves sold at $.75 per pound. $27,000 $30,000 $33,000