Air Report. Project Information PPTA/LAP. Traffic Data I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE. Project Number: , C501, P101 UPC:

Similar documents
Categorical Exclusion (CE)

I-70 East ROD 1: Phase 1 (Central 70 Project) Air Quality Conformity Technical Report

Qualitative Hot Spot Analysis for PM2.5 February 4, 2008

DRAFT PREPARED FOR: VDOT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISON PREPARED BY: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH: SC&A INC. KB ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, INC.

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

APPENDIX E EMISSIONS ESTIMATE FOR GENERAL CONFORMITY

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

Clean Air Act. Compliance

ITEM 9 Action October 18, 2017

AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS

Air Quality Technical Report

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

4.2 Air Quality Introduction Environmental and Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting. Existing Air Quality Conditions

4.12 AIR QUALITY INTRODUCTION

ITEM 8 Action May 17, 2017

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Florida Department of Transportation, District Three

AIR REGULATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA 3 JUNE 2016

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Planning and Environmental Management Office INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT

Clean Air Act History

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL OF CERTAIN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS

Introduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CEQA AIR QUALITY HANDBOOK. Guidelines for the Implementation of the. California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended

State of Utah. Department of Environmental Quality DAQE-AN October 26, 2009

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Corridor mapping widths of either 1-mile wide or 1000 feet wide were used for resources identified below.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

Berth [TraPac] Container Terminal Project Final General Conformity Determination

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMP ACT FOR. None assigned yet A-107, PE-101; UPC 70849

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER. Executive Summary Why Variable Pricing? What Was Studied? User Surveys Air Quality Analysis User And Equity Analysis

Air Quality, General Conformity & Class Exercise

Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1

Ethanol and Air Quality in Minnesota

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report Johnstown Area Transportation Study (JATS) TIP and 2040 LRTP

The New Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition It s Not Your Father s HCM

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

VOLUME I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Prepared by: Lehigh Valley Planning Commission. PUBLIC REVIEW: August 19, 2010 September 20, 2010

Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report NEPA MPO (Carbon County) 2015 TIP

1.1 Purpose of the Project

Highway 53 M-1 Alignment Air Quality Mitigation Assessment

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

Comments on Draft Permit #12-POY-079. FTS International Proppants, LLC. Acadia, Trempealeau, Wisconsin. March 15, 2013

Sketch Planning Methodology to Quantify Emissions Impacts at Border Crossings

The Secrets to HCM Consistency Using Simulation Models

Yellowstone National Park Winter Use Plan. Air Quality Analysis of Snowmobile and Snowcoach Emissions

Minnesota s State Implementation Plan

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

Dynamic Lane Merge Systems

Northeast Ohio NAAQS Nonattainment Factsheet Covering the counties of Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage and Summit

PROPOSED NEW STARTS AND SMALL STARTS POLICY GUIDANCE. January 9, 2013

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

CONFORMITY DETERMINATION REPORT

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35W FROM INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 820 TO INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 30 CITY OF FORT WORTH TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

Tier 1 Recommendations October 30, 2017

Testimony of Seyed Sadredin Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

Air Quality issues in Sri Lanka. R.N.R.Jayaratne Assistant Director Air, Noise, Vibration Monitoring Unit CENTRAL ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORITY

Use of TMC Data for Performance Measurement and Improving Operations. National Rural ITS Conference August 25, 2014 Ming Shiun Lee URS Corporation

PPTA Project Pipeline

Prepared for. Prepared by

FINAL REPORT FIELD VALIDATION OF SPEED ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES FOR AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

APPENDIX I RECORD OF NON APPLICABILITY

CO TAQA Technical Report

APPENDIX C COMMENTS AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION

500 Interchange Design

VDOT ASSESSMENT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DULLES AIR CARGO, PASSENGER METRO ACCESS HIGHWAY

Effect of High-Occupancy Toll Lanes on Mass Vehicle Emissions

Benefit Cost Analysis 2016 TIGER Grant Application Funding Opportunity #: DTOS59-16-RA-TIGER8

Air Quality Protection Strategy 2003

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

HB2 Implementation Policy Guide

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. DATE ISSUED: January 7, 2015 ISSUED TO: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

Chapter 1 Introduction

TRAFFIC FORECASTING REQUIREMENTS BY PROJECT TYPE. August Research Report

POTENTIAL TO EMIT LIMITATIONS FOR PART 70 SOURCES. (Adopted 6/15/1995, revised 1/18/2001 and 1/20/2011)

REGIONAL SOLICITATION ROADWAY APPLICATIONS: POTENTIAL CHANGES. TAB September 20, 2017

Handbook for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

Traffic Signals Affect Our Everyday Lives

PLAN TO IMPROVE AIR QUALITY IN THE WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VA REGION

NO2, SO2, PM2.5, Oh my!?! Information Session EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop May 10, 2010

COMPARISON OF PROJECT AGAINST EXISTING CONDITIONS

This comparison is designed to satisfy the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines, Section (d), Evaluation of Alternatives, which state that:

The Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices

APPENDIX A TIER 1 ANALYSIS

NW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80)

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

I-405 Freeway (OC Line to LAX) HOV to HOT Conversion Feasibility Study. Metro TAC Meeting March 5, 2014

Controlling NOx and other Engine Emissions

AMERICA RIDES ON US KEYS TO A SUCCESSFUL ALTERNATE BIDDING PROCESS

Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Identifying Sources to be Evaluated for Inclusion in an Increment Assessment

Transcription:

Air Report Project Information Project Name: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE Project Number: 0495-029-123, C501, P101 UPC: 105130 Route Number: 495 Project Limit - From: South of Old Dominion Drive overpass To: George Washington Memorial Parkway District City/County Residency Northern Virginia Fairfax Fairfax IPM Project Description: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE Air Quality: Additional Project Description: Funding Source: No Traffic safety and congestion reduction improvement by converting approximately 2.0 miles of left shoulder on I495 NB into travel lane during peak AM and PM hours. Shoulder-lane use will lengthen merging distance onto I495 General Purpose Lanes and alleviate extended queues for traffic exiting the I495 Express Lanes. Shoulder conversion work includes widening right shoulder up to 4 ft; potentially adding one or two pull-offs for emergency use; and installation of advance static and dynamic signage and an overhead lane-use signal system. Milling, paving, and restriping will take place through the project limits. Federal PPTA/LAP Locally Administered? No PPTA? No Traffic Data Design Year: Existing Year: Design Year Traffic ADT: Existing Year Traffic ADT: Project Opening Year:

TASK INFORMATION Task/Subtask PED AED Assigned To Air Determination 11/29/2013 11/19/2013 Ponticello, James P I. Carbon Monoxide This project is located in: A Carbon Monoxide Attainment Area CO Microscale Analysis Required for NEPA? No This project qualifies for a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion or has been identified as being exempt from a CO air quality analysis per the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR Part 93), and therefore does not require a project-level CO air quality analysis per VDOT's Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Air Quality Studies Agreement with FHWA dated February 27, 2009. The project is identified as being exempt from the requirement to determine conformity according to the federal transportation conformity rule and/or qualifies for a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) according to the PCE Agreement in effect between the Federal Highway Administration and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Accordingly, it is concluded that the project would not significantly impact air quality and would not cause or contribute to a new violation, increase the frequency or severity of an existing violation, or delay timely attainment of any National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Comments: The project purpose states: "Traffic safety improvements by converting approximately 2 miles of left shoulder on I-495 NB into travel lane during peak AM and PM hours. Shoulder-lane use would lengthen merging distance onto I-495 General Purpose Lanes and alleviate extended queues for traffic exiting the I-495 Express Lanes. Shoulder conversion work includes widening right shoulder up to 4 ft; potentially adding one or two pull-offs for emergency use; and installation of advance static and dynamic signage and an overhead laneuse signal system." The project is therefore exempt under two categories in 40 CFR 93.126, Table 2, Safety, including "projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature" and "shoulder improvements". Since the project is exempt under the federal transportation conformity regulation, a CO microscale analysis is not required. Additional justification is provided in the comment field below. II. Ozone This project is located in: An 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area This project is one of a class of projects that is exempt from regional emission requirements under conformity. This exempt category includes certain safety and neutral 'de minimis' projects whose air quality effects would not be detected by the regional emissions analysis for the transportation plans and programs (40CFR 93.126 & 127). Comments: Exempt as noted above. This project is located in a VOC/NOx Emission Control Area. All reasonable precautions should be taken to limit VOCs and NOx emissions. Restrictions and prohibitions may apply to open burning, fugitive dust and the use of cutback asphalt, particularly during the months of April through October. Refer to DEQ s Open Burning Regulation (9 VAC 5-130-10 et seq.); Cutback Asphalt Regulation (9 VAC 5-40-5490 et seq.); and Fugitive Dust Regulation (9 VAC 5-50-60 et seq.) for requirements.

III. Particulate Matter This project is located in: A PM2.5 Nonattainment Area This project is one of a class of projects that is exempt from regional emission requirements under conformity. This exempt category includes certain safety and neutral 'de minimis' projects whose air quality effects would not be detected by the regional emissions analysis for the transportation plans and programs (40CFR 93.126 & 127). PM Hotspot Analysis Required for NEPA? No Yes No [ ] [X] Is this project a new or expanded highway project that serves a significant volume of or will result in a significant increase in diesel vehicles, such as facilities with greater than 125,000 annual average daily traffic (AADT) and 8% or more of such AADT is diesel truck traffic? [ ] [X] Does this project create a new or expanded bus or rail terminal or transfer point that will have, or result in an increase of, a significant number of diesel vehicles congregating at that location? [ ] [X] Does this project affect intersections that are at LOS D, E or F with a significant number of diesel vehicles, or that will change to LOS D, E or F because of increased traffic volumes from a significant number of diesel vehicles related to the project? [ ] [X] Can this project otherwise be considered a project of "air quality concern" as outlined in 40 CFR 93.123 (b)(1) (i),(ii),(iii) or (iv) or (v), or following recommendations obtained through the VDOT PM2.5 Hotspot Screening Process? The final rule that establishes the transportation conformity criteria and procedures for determining which transportation projects must be analyzed for local air quality impacts in Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) nonattainment and maintenance areas was published on March 10, 2006. This project is located in the Northern Virginia PM2.5 nonattainment area. Transportation Conformity Guidance for Qualitative Hot-spot Analysis in PM2.5 and PM10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas, circulated on March 29, 2006, outlines how to conduct qualitative PM2.5 hot-spot analyses for projects of air quality concern, as defined in the final rule by 40 CFR 93.123(b)(1). Projects of air quality concern are highway and transit projects that involve significant levels of diesel traffic, or any project that is identified as a localized air quality concern by the PM2.5 State Implementation Plan (SIP). The guidance also notes that a PM2.5 hot-spot analysis is not required for projects that are not an air quality concern, but states that the projectlevel conformity determination should document Clean Air Act and 40 CFR 93.116 requirements were met without a hot-spot analysis, since the project has been found to not be of air quality concern under 40 CFR 93.123(b)(1). A comparison of this project with examples of projects considered to be projects of air quality concern (that would be covered by 40 CFR 93.123(b)(1) and would require a qualitative PM2.5 hot-spot analysis) shows that this project is not a project of air quality concern. The construction of this project would not result in a significant increase in the number of diesel vehicles in the area.

Since the project was not found to be a project of air quality concern under 40 CFR 91.123(b)(1), a PM2.5 hot-spot analysis is not required. The following statement should be added to the environmental document for the proposed project: A PM2.5 hot-spot analysis is not required for this project since it is not an air quality concern. The Clean Air Act and 40 CFR 93.116 requirements were met without a hot-spot analysis, since this project has been found not to be of air quality concern under 40 CFR 93.123(b)(1). Comments: Exempt as noted above. Additionally, this project is not expected to have a significant increase in the number of diesel vehicles, and therefore it is not considered to be one of air quality concern for fine particulate matter. The traffic study concluded that diesel truck traffic is not anticipated to increase as a result of this project. As was noted, only 2-axle vehicles and buses are permitted in the Express Lanes, and the I-495 Express Lanes Shoulder Use Project would only provide an operational enhancement during peak periods by providing a longer distance for Express Lanes motorists to merge with the general purpose lanes; however no increase in traffic volumes (or diesel truck traffic) is anticipated, and therefore traffic volumes in the build and no-build scenarios are expected to remain the same throught the project corridor. IV. Mobile Source Air Toxics This project requires: No further discussion of MSAT This project qualifies as a categorical exclusion under 23 CFR 771.117 (c) and/or is exempt under 40 CFR 93.126. As such, this project has been determined to generate minimal air quality impacts for Clean Air Act criteria pollutants and has not been linked with any special MSAT concerns. As such, this project will not result in any meaningful changes in traffic volumes, vehicle mix, basic project location, or any other factor that would cause an increase in MSAT impacts of the project from that of the no-build alternative. Moreover, EPA regulations for vehicle engines and fuels will cause overall MSAT emissions to decline significantly over the next several decades. Based on regulations now in effect, an analysis of national trends with EPA's MOVES model forecasts a combined reduction of over 80 percent in the total annual emission rate for the priority MSAT from 2010 to 2050 while vehicle-miles of travel are projected to increase by over 100 percent. This will both reduce the background level of MSAT as well as the possibility of even minor MSAT emissions from this project. Basis for decision: Exempt as noted above. Additionally, the traffic study that was completed for this project concluded that the project will have no impact on traffic volumes or vehicle mix.

Comments The project purpose states "Traffic safety improvements by converting approximately 2 miles of left shoulder on I-495 NB into travel lane during peak AM and PM hours. Shoulder-lane use would lengthen merging distance onto I-495 General Purpose Lanes and alleviate extended queues for traffic exiting the I-495 Express Lanes. Shoulder conversion work includes widening right shoulder up to 4 ft; potentially adding one or two pull-offs for emergency use; and installation of advance static and dynamic signage and an overhead lane-use signal system. Milling, paving, and restriping would take place through the project limits." Additionally, the queues at the northern terminus of the Northbound Express Lanes, where traffic from the Express Lanes merge into the general purpose lanes, are expected to intensify as traffic on the Express Lanes continues to grow into the future. Not only is there the potential for delays, but traffic disruptions and safety concerns resulting from merge and weave activities onto the general purpose lanes is also a concern. Therefore, the project is exempt under two categories in 40 CFR 93.126, Table 2, Safety, including "projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature" and "shoulder improvements". The proposed signage improvements are also exempt under under the category of "directional and informational signs." Since the project falls under an exempt category in the transportation conformity regulation, a CO microscale analysis is not required. In addition, a CO microscale analysis was previously completed for the I-495 HOT Lanes project in 2005, and updated in 2007, which concluded that peak 1-hour and 8-hour CO concentrations in the interim (2020) and design (2030) years would remain well below the 1-hour and 8-hour CO NAAQS of 35 and 9 ppm, respectively. Since this project is not anticipated to increase traffic volumes on either the Express or General Purpose lanes, and is actually expected to reduce congestion and increase speeds during peak periods within the project corridor, the conclusions from the original air study are still considered valid; the project is not anticipated to cause or contribute to a violation of any NAAQS, worsen any existing violations, or delay timely attainment of any NAAQS. Updated regulatory citations: This project is located within a Moderate 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment area, a Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Nonattainment area, and a volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) Emissions Control Area. As such, all reasonable precautions should be taken to limit the emissions of VOC, NOx, and particulate matter. In addition, the following VDEQ air pollution regulations must be adhered to during the construction of this project: 9 VAC 5-130, Open Burning restrictions; 9 VAC 5-45, Article 7, Cutback Asphalt restrictions; and 9 VAC 5-50, Article 1, Fugitive Dust precautions.