SULPHUR RECOVERY BY TAIL GAS TREATING TECHNOLOGY (MCRC PROCESS) MAXIMUM CLAUS

Similar documents
Downsizing a Claus Sulfur Recovery Unit

PROClaus: The New Standard for Claus Performance

WWT Two-Stage Sour Water Stripping

BURNER FLAME TEMPERATURE DURING WARM UP AND HOT STANDBY. Alan D. Mosher KPS Technology & Engineering LLC

Minimize Sulfur Pit Vent Contribution to Stack Emissions

CANSOLV SO2 Scrubbing System - 10 Years of Reliable Operation Integration with SRU Tail Gas Incineration

Cansolv Technologies Inc. Alberta NOx and SOx Control Technologies Symposium April 9, Rick Birnbaum

Claus plants. SURE oxygen enrichment portfolio for sulfur recovery in

Removing sulfurcrete from Claus plant sulfur condensers with TubeMaster, the tube cleaning system of mycon

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

PTAC PROCESS TECHNOLOGY II - SYSTEMS. Last Reviewed: Page 1 of 10

Treatment Options for Molten Sulfur

ADVANCED PROCESS CONTROL QATAR GAS ONE YEAR EXPERIENCE

Simulation and Optimization of Energy Consumption of Sulfur Recovery Unit at Fifth Refinery of South Pars Gas Complex

Steam Power Station (Thermal Station)

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

Instructor s t Background

Oxygen Enrichment of Sulfur Recovery Units to Boost Capacity, Conserve Capital, and Improve Environmental Performance

CEMENT MANUFACTURING PROCESS

Process Gas Monitoring In Petroleum Refineries

Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes

MODERN COKE OVEN GAS TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY AT A NEW COKE MAKING PLANT IN BRAZIL*

Sulsim Sulfur Recovery in Aspen HYSYS V9 A Brief Tutorial for Using and Optimizing Your Sulfur Recovery Unit in Aspen HYSYS

Gasification of Biomass and SulfurContaining Carbonaceous Fuels. Majid Charmchi

Electric Furnace Off-Gas Cleaning Systems Installation at PT Inco ABSTRACT

GASOLINE FROM NATURAL GAS BY SULFUR PROCESSING

S.E. (Chemical) (First Semester) EXAMINATION, 2012 PROCESS CALCULATIONS (2008 PATTERN) Time : Three Hours Maximum Marks : 100

HIGH PUITY CARBON MONOXIDE FROM A FEED GAS ARNOLD KELLER AND RONALD SCHENDEL KINETICS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA

Metallurgical Gas Cleaning System Design for Emissions Control and Energy Efficiency

Evonik s Andrussow process expertise for tailor-made solutions

Item Hydrogen Gas Plant

SURE Double Combustion Increases Capacity at the. Tesoro Northwest Company Sulfur Plant (Anacortes, WA)

Chapter 2.6: FBC Boilers

Chapter 2.7: Cogeneration

Notification of Department of Industrial Works

The Rectisol Process. Lurgi s leading technology for purification and conditioning of synthesis gas

SRU-TGTU Analyzer Best Practices. RefComm Galveston 2016 Sulfur Recovery

Energy Efficiency Analysis Using Pinch Technology: A Case Study of Orbit Chemicals Industry

with Physical Absorption

Potentials and Limitations with respect to NO x -Reduction of Coke Plants

MOLECULAR GATE TECHNOLOGY FOR (SMALLER SCALE) LNG PRETREATMENT

Finding the Root Cause is Critical

H. Gomaa / ICEHM2000, Cairo University, Egypt, September, 2000, page

Topsoe s Emission Management Solution--DeNOx

Integration and Onsite System Aspects of Industrial Post-Combustion CCS

Minimize the Risk of Fire During Distillation Column Maintenance

Kalex Kalina Cycle Power Systems For Use as a Bottoming Cycle for Combined Cycle Applications

Influence of Process Operations on VOC and BTEX Emissions from Glycol Dehydration Units

Soda Ash ( Sodium carbonate) Manufacture

SCREENING PROCESSES FOR REMOVAL OF H 2 S FROM ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY CO 2 STREAMS

10/2/2013. Gas CHEMICAL PLANTS AMMONIA METHANOL UTILITIES TOWN GASS SUPPLIES ENERGY INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES. Power Generation

Understand boiler performance characteristics. Use these suggestions when buying, designing or optimizing steam generators

Biomass Gasification

GT-LPG Max SM. Maximizing LPG Recovery from Fuel Gas Using a Dividing Wall Column. Engineered to Innovate

Challenges for Processing Oil and Gas from Kazakhstan

BIOGAS PURIFICATION AND UTILIZATION. ENVE 737 Anaerobic Biotechnology for Bio-energy Production

Condensate System Troubleshooting andoptimization

Plant construction and waste heat systems for the chemical industry

Energy Use, Loss and Opportunities Analysis for U.S Manufacturing and Mining

LICONOX Linde s new technology for removal of NOx and SOx integrated in the CO 2 processing unit

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Recovery Boiler Corrosion Chemistry

Green Fuel Nordic The Smart Way. Utilising RTP TM technology to produce sustainable 2 nd generation bio-oil from local feedstocks

III.P. Recovery and utilization of waste gas in refinery facilities

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Carbon Monoxide PERP 09/10S11

Assessment of Losses of Reheating Furnace in a Steel Re-Rolling Mill

Start-Up of World s First Commercial Post-Combustion Coal Fired CCS Project: Contribution of Shell Cansolv to SaskPower Boundary Dam ICCS Project

Optimisation of hydrogen production with CO 2 capture by methane. steam reforming integrated with a chemical-looping combustion.

OPTIMISATION OF ANGLO PLATINUM S ACP ACID PLANT CATALYTIC CONVERTER. M. K. SICHONE Anglo Platinum, ACP, Kroondal, South Africa

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

Plastics Recycling. Datchanee Pattavarakorn Industrial Chemistry, Science, CMU

Synthesis Gas Processes for Synfuels Production

Autothermal Reforming for efficient and versatile syngas production. Esben Sorensen, Haldor Topsoe Inc. GSTC 2017 Syngas Technologies Conference

Innovative New Chimney Design for Wet Flue Gas. Paul Nederlof, Msc. Hadek Protective Systems, Inc. 651 Holiday Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15241

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

Hydrogen is a particularly

Modular Oil & Gas Equipment Onshore & Offshore

Hydrogen-Rich Gas Production from Plasmatron Reforming of Biofuels

High Bridge Combined Cycle Plant

Combined Methane Decomposition and Ammonia Formation Cell

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION

ECONOMICAL AND EFFECTIVE BIOGAS PROCESS TO PURIFY ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR POWER GENERATION. James Smith, Ph.D., P. Eng. Carmine Fontana, P. Eng.

Techno-Economic Analysis for Ethylene and Oxygenates Products from the Oxidative Coupling of Methane Process

High-efficiency low LCOE combined cycles for sour gas oxy-combustion with CO[subscript 2] capture

Coke Manufacturing. Environmental Guidelines for. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

American Journal of Chemical Engineering

Nathan A. Hatcher and Ralph H. Weiland, Optimized Gas Treating Inc., USA, discuss the fate of ammonia in refinery amine systems.

Modelling of post combustion capture plant flexibility

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Swirl chamber for vitrification of fly ashes

Wet granulation of blast furnace slag has been

Energy from Waste Incineration

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

Article 1: Article 2:

Modelling of CO 2 capture using Aspen Plus for EDF power plant, Krakow, Poland

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

4.1 Introduction 4.2 Kiln System. 4.3 Kiln System Analysis 4.4 Results and Discussion 4.5 Conclusion

Prevention Strategies Design and Coatings

1. Scaling. H.O.: H-5/21, KRISHNA NAGAR, DELHI Tel.: , Fax:

Transcription:

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 3, No 4, 2014, 1609 1613 ISSN 2278-3687 (O) SULPHUR RECOVERY BY TAIL GAS TREATING TECHNOLOGY (MCRC PROCESS) MAXIMUM CLAUS Sulabh Jangra and Akshit Bhardwaj Dr. Shanti Swaroop Bhatnagar University Insitute of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Panjab University-160014 Email: sulabhjangra@gmail.com Abstract: During the past two decades, the principal concern on the control of sulfur oxides emission has been focused on flue gases from fuel combustion. Fuel combustion accounts for three-fourth of the estimated sulfur dioxide emissions in the world. On one hand, the emission limits are tightening, sulfur in fuel has also shown an increasing trend. During the past decade a lot of energy has been directed to remove elemental sulfur from the sour gas containing varying compositions of hydrogen sulfide. Of all the industries electric power generation and industries using boilers account for the major emissions of sulfur oxides. The light hydrocarbon produced in the refineries, both straight run and cracked, contain varying proportions of hydrocarbon sulfides. This must be removed for two reasons: (i) To reduce the sulfur dioxide emissions if the gas is burned. (ii) To meet the product specifications if the light hydrocarbon product is sold. The conventional processes with 94% efficiency is finding hard to keep up with the tightening controls. Thus modification of conventional units is the need of ours that increase the sulfur recovery to about 99%. To choose a suitable process, various parameters should be kept in mind, namely cost, product specifications, safety, and location. Keywords: Sulfur, Sulfreen, MCRC process, Claus process, sulfuric acid. Introduction Sulfur is a widely used chemical agent for its chemical and non-chemical properties. Sulfuric acid is known as the king of the chemicals, can also be obtained by sulfur. Some important properties of sulfur are: Color Bright yellow Atomic number Melting point Boiling point Standard atomic weight 16 113 K 445 K 32.06 g/mol Heat of Fusion 1.727 KJ/mol Sulfur is also extracted directly from nature as it is found in meteorites, volcanoes, and hot springs. Some important uses of sulfur are as follows: Received July 199, 2014 * Published August 2, 2014 * www.ijset.net

1610 Sulabh Jangra and Akshit Bhardwaj # It is used for the production of sulfuric acid, which then used in many other manufacturing processes. # Sulfuric acid is used primarily for the manufacture of fertilizers, organic and inorganic chemicals, pigments, steel, rayon, petroleum products, and explosives. # The principal industries using elemental sulfur as such include wood pulp, carbon disulphide, insecticide and fungicides, rubber, sugar, starch, and malt dyestuffs. # Rubber uses ground sulfur and specially prepared amorphous sulfur for compounding and vulcanizing. # Sulfur is also used in the manufacture of polysulfide elastomers in making sulfur cements in the production of free aching steels. # It is also used as a polymerization inhibitor in the manufacturing of matches. # Sulfur is also used in building constructions. # Sulfur is required for the preparation of sulfide cooking liquors in the production of sulfite pulp. Methods for recovery of sulfur: 1) Super Claus Process. (2) IFP - 1500 Process (3) Shell Claus off gas Treating (4) Sulfreen Process. (5) Selectox Process PROCESS AND EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION In this hydrogen sulfide rich acid gas stream from the Amine Regeneration Unit stripper is delivered to the sulfur recovery plant at a very low positive pressure (about 9 psig) situated with water vapor at 94 o F. The gas without any treatment passes to the free flame combustion furnace. The stoichiometric amount of air for the combustion is supplied by a positive displacement rotary blower. It has been shown stoichiometrically that oxygen required will be that needed to convert one third of hydrogen sulfide in feed to sulfur dioxide. The ratio of air to acid gas is manually controlled by means of a by pass on the air line in order to provide the correct amount of air for complete combustion of hydrocarbons, and oxidation of the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur.

Sulphur Recovery by Tail Gas Treating Technology (MCRC Process) Maximum 1611 COMBUSTION FURNACE A cylindrical horizontal furnace equipped with an electric arc filament in the pre-heat chamber is used. Acid gas and air are pre-heated at the entry and the combustion starts and reaction from passes along the length of furnace. The furnace is very loosely packed with refractory material and is lined over the walls with silica bricks. The need for such packing has been demonstrated in pilot plant studies, where it was found that in the absence of packing the reaction front moved out through the exist end of furnace and combustion was eventually extinguished in the line. With the operating conditions of 1350 Deg. C flame temperature and one atmosphere pressure, a 75% conversion of H 2 S to SO 2 is affected. WASTE HEAT BOILER A waste heat boiler is used to cool furnace exit gases prior to admitting them to the converters. The boiler, along with a feed water economizer recovers sufficient heat to generate high pressure saturated steam. After leaving the boiler, the gases are then condensed in a first sulfur condenser where the sulfur vapor is condensed and liquid sulfur is separated from gas and flows down in sulfur pit. FIRST STAGE REHEATER Process gas from the condenser then goes to the reheater so that the gases obtain the optimum temperature for the catalytic conversion in catalytic converter. CATALYTIC CONVERTER In order to make possible a recovery of over 80% it was found necessary to include catalytic converter for further treatment of the furnace exit gases. In this plant for example, three converters are used in series. Gas enters each converter in the center in the center of the

1612 Sulabh Jangra and Akshit Bhardwaj dome, is deflected radically by means of a single flat deflector, and then descend through the catalyst Bauxite (type) catalysts or Alumina based catalysts. All elemental sulfur formed in the kiln is allowed to remain in the gas stream to the 1st reactor it does not affect the reactions occurring there. In order to obtain the highest possible conversion in the 2nd stage. The sulfur produced in the kiln and the 1st converter is removed prior to admission of the gas to the second converter stage. This lowers the sulfur dew point of the second converter exit gas. CONDENSORS The gases from the first converter is then condensed in a second sulfur condenser where the sulfur vapor is condensed and liquid sulfur is separated from gas and flows down in sulfur pit. SECOND STAGE The second stage is similar to first stage. THIRD STAGE The gases leaving the third condenser is reheated in a reheater. The reheated gas is passed through the 3 rd converter containing high activity iron catalyst on a carrier. The sulfur product flows the condenser to a rundown pit. Then these exit gases goes to the vapor liquid separator where the last traces of molten sulfur is separated from gases and flows into a rundown pit. Remaining gases are then routed directly to the thermal incinerator. Tail Gas Treating Unit Tail gas treating unit is used to enhance the efficiency of the process up to 99.99 %. Basically the conversion of sulfur compounds having sulfur content less than takes place in TGTU which were not converted in Sulfur recovery process. The remains of SRU is heated and transferred to the catalytic converters where catalysts help to recover the remaining sulfur. The treated gas is sent back to the absorbers to remove the H 2 S and remaining CO 2. The rich amine (gas containing sulfur or H 2 S) is reheated and sent to regenerator column. The steam which is generated in the re-boiler removes H 2 S and CO 2 from the amine. The lean amine is removed and returned to the absorber. The remaining H 2 S and CO 2 and removed again fed to the condenser after cooling. Conclusion With the introduction of tail gas treating unit the efficiency can reach upto the level of 99.99 % [R3]. Also the product obtained is more yellow in color as compared to other processes for

Sulphur Recovery by Tail Gas Treating Technology (MCRC Process) Maximum 1613 sulfur recovery. Purity level is also high and around, saleable sulfur. Less pressure drop, less heat loss, no refractory damages, less vibrations are some other prominent advantages of MCRC process. The cost plays a vital role in selection of any project and the cost is much less as compared to that of Sulfreen process for sulfur recovery. In MCRC process an additional stage is added to the Claus unit containing iron-based high activity material on a carrier. This catalyst is insensitive to high water content in the process gas. This method has a distinct advantage over other processes as it is very easily adapted to the Claus Unit. It requires very little space as compared to sulfreen or Liquid Redox Method. Though sulfreen Process has fixed costs less than 60% of that super Claus unit it uses two reactors and produces sulfur which is less yellow than that obtained in Claus unit. The Selectox process has its limitation as the recovery is around 97% where as the recovery in super Claus unit is around 99%. The IFP 1500 could not really take off because of high operating costs though it provided high conversion rates. So, in nutshell it can be clearly observed that MCRC process is widely acceptable to recover sulfur. References [1] Claus Sulfur recovery options, Petroleum Technology Quarterly Spring 1997: 57-61, GAVIN MCINTYRE, LILI LYDDON, Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc., Bryan, Texas. [2] Claus unit Tail gas treatment catalysts, http://ww.topsoe.com/business_areas/refining/~/media/pdf%20files/refining/topsoe_claus_t ail_aug09_low_res.ashx Sulfur Recovery Claus & Tail Gas Treating [3] Tail gas treating, http://www.bechtel.com/3885.html [4] Selection Criteria for Claus Tail Gas Treating Processes, Mahin Rameshni, P.E. Technical Director, Sulphur Technology and Gas Processing, http://www.worleyparsons.com/csg/hydrocarbons/specialtycapabilities/documents/selecti on_criteria_for_claus_tail_gas_treating_processes.pdf