Ofei D. Mante* and FA Agblevor Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan UT; *RTI International, Research Triangle, NC

Similar documents
Stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils and upgraded products

Novel Ni-based catalysts for the hydrotreatment of fast pyrolysis oil

Catalytic Pyrolysis of Lignin for Bio oils

Outline. Comparative Fast Pyrolysis of Agricultural Residues for Use in Biorefineries. ECI Bioenergy-II:

Characterization studies of Waste- bio-derived feedstocks

Effect of Torrefaction on Biomass Chemistry and Hydrocarbons Production from Fast Pyrolysis

Sustainable Biofuels A Small Step towards Carbon Management

HYDROCONVERSION OF FAST PYROLYSIS BIO-OIL: UNDERSTANDING AND LIMITING MACROMOLECULES FORMATION. Alain Quignard / IFPEN

PYRENA PYRolysis Equipment for New Approaches to produce better bio-oil

Slow Pyrolysis Of Imperata Cylindrica In a Fixed Bed Reactor

Utilization of Fractionated Bio-Oil in Asphalt. R. Christopher Williams Justinus Satrio Marjorie Rover Robert C. Brown Sheng Teng

Sustained Hydrotreatment of Biomass Pyrolysis Bio oil with Minimal Catalyst Deactivation

Biomass Pyrolysis. Tony Bridgwater Bioenergy Research Group Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

Fast pyrolysis of guayule shrub and bagasse Colleen McMahan 1, Kwesi Boateng 2, Charles Mullin 2 Katrina Cornish 3

Development of a lab-scale auger reactor for biomass fast pyrolysis and process optimization using response surface methodology

CREATIVITY AND EXPERTISE to develop solutions for the marine industry. Green Tech 2016 Marine fuels from forest biomass

Utilization of Fractionated Bio-Oil in Asphalt. R. Christopher Williams Justinus Satrio Marjorie Rover Robert C. Brown Sheng Teng

The hydrothermal decomposition of biomass and waste to produce bio-oil

Conversion of Bio-oil to Hydrocarbons Via a Low Hydrogen Route Philip H. Steele and Sathish K. Tanneru

Processing Recalcitrant Feedstocks in a Biorefinery

Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of pyrolysis oil over nickel-based catalysts under H2/CO2 atmosphere

Conversion of Biomass Particles

We accept the challenge!

Fast Pyrolysis of Laurel (Laurus Nobilis L.) Seed in a Fixed-bed Tubular Reactor

Novel Ni-based catalysts for the hydrotreatment of fast pyrolysis liquids

Carbon To X. Processes

Principles of Pyrolysis

IEA Bioenergy. International Energy Agency. Applications for Utilisation of Liquids Produced by Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy

MULTI-WASTE TREATMENT AND VALORISATION BY THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES. Francisco Corona Encinas M Sc.

Formation of Liquid and Solid Products of Liquid Phase Pyrolysis

Design, Fabrication and Performance Study of a Biomass Solid Waste Pyrolysis System for Alternative Liquid Fuel Production

Synthetic fuels and chemical from biomass by the bioliq-process

GASOLINE FROM NATURAL GAS BY SULFUR PROCESSING

bio-oil produced from composted lignocellulosic biomass

The biocrack Process a refinery integrated biomass-to-liquid concept

Reprinted from November 2015 ENGINEERING HYDROCARBON

Torrefaction to Improve Biomass for Energy and Biofuels Production and Carbon Sequestion. Chris Hopkins, Research Associate

Biochar Characterization and Engineering

Status and Outlook for bioliq-project Syngas Platform for High Performance Fuels

Heavy Oil and Bitumen Analytical. Understanding Their Capabilities

Influence of oxidative and non-oxidative conditions on petroleum pitch properties

The potential and challenges of drop in biofuels

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

Fluidised Bed Methanation Technology for Improved Production of SNG from Coal

Application of activated process char for gas treatment of biomass gasification producer gases

Relationships Between Heating Value and Lignin, Moisture, Ash and Extractive Contents of Biomass Fuels

TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THE FINNISH CASE STUDY

Development of Tar Removal Technologies for Biomass Gasification using the By-products

24-25 September Lodi. Paolo Taddei Pardelli Spike Renewables Srl RE-CORD Consortium Florence, Italy

Catalytic cracking characteristics of bio-oil molecular distillation fraction

The production of biochar and byproducts. Tony Bridgwater Bioenergy Research Group Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

Milad Zarghami-Tehran. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science

Gasification of Biomass and SulfurContaining Carbonaceous Fuels. Majid Charmchi

Pyrolysis for Biochar Production

International Advanced Coal Technologies Conference June 23-24, 2010

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

Fractional Condensation of Bio-Oil Vapors

Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of fast pyrolysis and gasification for biofuel production

Dual Fluidized Bed Steam Gasification of Coal and Pyrolyzed Coal

Fıxed bed slow pyrolysıs of bıomass solıd waste for bıo-char

Pyrolysis. 1 st Brazil-U.S. Biofuels Short Course Institute for Advanced Studies University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Review of Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass for Bio-oil

Biochar production via Low Temperature Conversion (LTC) technology using a Thermocatalytic Loop Type Reactor

APPLICATION NOTE. UOP : Analysis of Trace CO and CO 2 in bulk H 2 and Light Gaseous Hydrocarbons by GC

Standardization of Analytical Techniques for Pyrolysis Bio-oil

REMOVAL OF RESIDUAL CHAR FINES FROM PYROLYSIS VAPORS BY HOT GAS FILTRATION

INTEGRATED HEAT, ELECTRICITY AND BIO-OIL PRODUCTION. IEA Biomass Task 34 Meeting in Chicago Jani Lehto, Metso Pekka Jokela, UPM

Biomass gasification gas cleaning by reforming Energy Lab 2.0 meets Neo-Carbon Energy Noora Kaisalo

Effect of Temperature on the Catalytic Performance of Dolomite for H 2 Production by Steam Reforming of a Bio-oil/ethanol Mixture

Kraftstoffe aus Abfällen - eine Problemdiskussion

Green Fuel Nordic The Smart Way. Utilising RTP TM technology to produce sustainable 2 nd generation bio-oil from local feedstocks

Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Alcell Lignin with Nano-NiO

INDIRECT vs. DIRECT GASIFICATION

Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Bio-Routes to para-xylene PERP 2011S3

Value Chain for Production of Bio-oil from Kraft Lignin for use as Bio-jet Fuel

Pyrolysis Oils: Characterization, Stability Analysis, and Catalytic Upgrading to Fuels and Chemicals

INNOVATIVE BIOFUEL TECHNOLOGY

Lignin valorization towards materials, chemicals and energy

The biocrack Process a refinery integrated biomass-to-liquid concept to produce diesel from biogenic feedstock

Corrosion properties of bio-oil and its emulsions with diesel

Biocharproduction: Basics, Facilities and Potentials

Commercialization Plan of Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP)

Synthesis Gas Production from Biomass

Plastic to Fuel Technologies

From lab to commercial success biomass-to-liquid innovations story with VTT

Biochar production through slow pyrolysis of different biomass materials: Seeking the best operating conditions

An#cipate, Innovate, and Deliver. Southern States Energy Board. Sept th, 2016 Rogers, AK. An#cipate, Innovate, and Deliver LLNL-PRES

Anellotech and Suntory Enter Next Phase of Strategic Partnership to Develop 100 Percent Bio-Based Plastics for Sustainable Beverage Bottles

The synthesis of novel carbon-based materials from

2008 Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, Tennessee, January 8-11, 2008

Measuring trace impurities in HyCO, regeneration hydrogen and inert gases Los Gatos Research (LGR)

THE CHALMERS GASIFIER

2/19/2013. Manure Management Introduction Thermochemical Technologies Introduction and Advantages

The Pyrolysis-Bioenergy-Biochar Pathway to Carbon Negative Energy

Green Fuel Nordic Corporate Presentation year 2014

STUDIES ON NUCLEAR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION BY STEAM COAL GASIFICATION IN ARGENTINA

The Biomass Option. Types of Biomass. Pellets market and products. Summary and Conclusions

Commercial biochar production and its certification

Transcription:

Physicochemical properties of biomass catalytic pyrolysis oils: A 13 C NMR spectroscopic investigation of the effects of functional groups on oil properties. Ofei D. Mante* and FA Agblevor Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan UT; *RTI International, Research Triangle, NC

Introduction The production of infrastructure-ready biocrude oil from catalytic pyrolysis offers an opportunity to co-process biomass derived intermediates alongside petroleum feedstock. One of the critical success factors for commercial scale biocrude coprocessing is the physicochemical properties of the upgraded bio-oil. Fuel properties such as specific gravity, viscosity, acidity, storage stability, carbon residue, and etc., are of interest to a Refiner. The bulk oxygen content of the biocrude do not reflect the fuel properties and may not per se be the yardstick in determining the suitability of upgraded pyrolysis as a supplemental feedstock in a conventional petroleum refinery. The chemical components responsible for the physical properties of biocrude is still not well understood.

Objectives Develop advanced characterization methods to understand the effect of functional groups on the physicochemical properties of catalytic pyrolysis oils(cpo). Develop catalysts that can completely eliminate the functional groups that have adverse effect on the fuel property of CPOs.

Materials and Methods Materials Corn stover, switchgrass, pinyon juniper, poplar, pine wood and pine bark Catalysts: HZSM-5 (Clariant Inc) Methods Pilot scale bubbling fluidized bed catalytic pyrolysis reactor Reactor capacity: 2 kg/h

Pyrolysis System Temperature = 475 o C, Fluidizing gas flow rate = (N 2 = 0.4 SCFM, NCG=2.0 SCFM) Biomass feed rate = 1kg/h, Catalyst loading = 1 kg, Run time = 3 h

Product Analysis Gas chromatography H 2, CH 4, CO, CO 2 and C 2 -C 5 hydrocarbons. (Varian 490 micro GC) Elemental analysis C, H, N, S and O (ThermoFisher Scientific organic elemental analyzer) Physical properties: Acidity, Viscosity, Density, Storage Stability, TGA residue, HHV, and Moisture 13 C-NMR Solvent = dimethyl sulfoxide-d 6, Number of scans = 3000, Temperature = 35 o C. (Varian 400 MHz, JOEL 300 MHz Spectrometer)

Results: Elemental and ash analysis of the various biomass feedstocks Elemental Composition (wt.%) d.b Poplar Pine Pinyon- Juniper Biomass Feedstock Switchgrass Corn Stover Pine Bark C 50.31 52.11 51.59 48.07 46.49 53.41 H 6.02 5.03 5.33 5.028 5.30 4.88 N 0.02 0.07 0.34 0.65 0.43 0.22 O* 43.18 42.36 42.34 40.93 38.81 40.47 Ash 0.46 0.43 0.40 5.32 8.97 1.02 ([d.b]-dry basis, *by difference)

Results: Product Yields (wt% on biomass) from the pilot-scale catalytic pyrolysis with ZSM-5 zeolite Pyrolysis Product Total liquid product WESP Fraction Condenser Fraction Char/coke Gases (by difference) Yields (wt %) Hybrid Pinyon- Corn Pine Pine Switchgrass Poplar Juniper Stover bark 41.1±4.2 42.5±2.5 39.2±0.3 40.3±4.2 36.8± 34.8± 8.4±2.8 9.3±1.5 10.2±1.1 10.0±2.6 5.3 6.4 32.7±1.4 32.2±4.0 29.2±1.1 30.2±1.6 31.5 37.6 17.0±1.6 17.5±3.6 22.8±0.5 25.0±0.8 26.45 33.4 41.9±5.7 40.0±1.1 38.0±0.6 34.7±5.0 36.8 31.8

Results: Physical properties of CPOs Physical properties Pine Hybrid poplar Corn Stover Switchgrass Pinyon juniper Pine Bark ph 3.71 3.66 4.58 4.99 4.51 4.03 Density (g/cm 3 ) 1.10 1.12 1.08 1.10 1.06 1.14 Estimated gravity, o API -2.9-5.2-0.5-2.9 2.0-7.4 Kinematic Viscosity (at 40 o C, cst) 30.0 43.3 23.7 87.5 15.3 90.9 Dynamic Viscosity (at 40 o C, cp) 33.2 48.6 25.6 95.9 16.2 103.5 Long term storage Stability (Viscosity after 18 months of 206.3 217.5 140.9 536.1 41.0 247.6 storage, at 40 o C, cst) Average rate of viscosity change, (cst/day) 0.43 0.46 0.31 1.18 0.07 0.41 TGA residue at 550 o C, wt.% 13.02 15.63 9.99 14.61 8.06 13.79

Results : 13 C-NMR Analysis Aromatic C-C DMSO-d 6 solvent Aromatic C-O Aromatic C-H Aliphatic hydrocarbons COOH, COOR, CONR 2 COR & COH C-OH, C-OR O-CH 3 13 C-NMR spectrum of biocrude oil produced from pinyon juniper

Results : 13 C-NMR of CPOs (percentage total carbon) Type of carbon Chemical Biocrude oils Shift, δ (ppm) Pine Poplar Corn Stover Switchgrass Pinyon Juniper Pine Bark Aliphatic C-C 55-0 16.49 17.32 17.52 25.17 22.82 16.66 Methoxy C (-OCH 3 ) 57-55 1.17 4.62 1.05 1.89 1.10 1.47 Aliphatic C-O (including levoglucosan) 103-60 3.57 6.20 1.25 2.53 1.28 7.95 Aromatic C-H 125-105 27.36 21.83 28.59 29.01 21.17 29.56 Aromatic C-C (carbons in aromatic hydrocarbons 140-125 40.63 37.82 41.44 28.06 42.96 31.59 further from an O atom) Aromatic C-O 160-140 10.11 10.62 8.67 10.88 9.97 12.07 Carbonyl (carboxylic acids and derivatives) 180-160 0.18 0.64 0.89 1.60 0.38 0.19 Carbonyl (aldehydes, ketones) 220-180 0.49 0.96 0.59 0.86 0.33 0.51

Effect of Aromatic Hydrocarbon and Phenolics on Viscosity Aromatic hydrocarbons decreases viscosity Phenolic compounds appear to increase viscosity

Effect of Sugars and Hydrocarbons on Density Anhydrosugars increases the density Hydrocarbons decreases the density

Effect of Carbonyls and Hydrocarbons on Storage Instability Carbonyl species appear to increase instability Aromatic hydrocarbons appear to decrease instability

Effect of Elemental Composition on Carbon Residue and Acidity High carbon content results in less formation of residue Relatively high nitrogen contents reduces the acidity

Summary Property Total C-C carbons Phenolic Carbons Carbons types determined by 13 CNMR Levogluco Phenolic/ Carbons levogluco Carbonyls Oxyge nates Aroma C-C Aroma C-O Elemental ph 0.20 0.05-0.64-0.27 0.56-0.20-0.31-0.22 0.70 0.90 Density (g/cm 3 ) -0.93 0.76 0.94 0.95 0.02 0.94-0.62 0.77-0.87-0.20 Gravity, o API 0.94-0.76-0.94-0.95-0.04-0.94 0.63-0.76 0.88 0.19 Kinematic Viscosity (at 40 oc, cst) Storage Stability- Rate of change in viscosity (cst/day) TGA residue at 550 o C, wt.% Pearson Correlation Coefficients (Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05) -0.88 0.86 0.59 0.85 0.38 0.88-0.98 0.82-0.47 0.43-0.54 0.64 0.05 0.45 0.82 0.54-0.83 0.33-0.34 0.74-0.81 0.66 0.70 0.77 0.43 0.81-0.68 0.61-0.91 0.04 C N

Conclusions Catalytic pyrolysis with product gas recycle was conducted on six different biomass feedstocks using HZSM-5 catalyst in a 2 kg/h fluidized bed reactor. Partially deoxygenated biocrudes oils with improved fuel properties was achieved with zeolite based-catalysts. 13 C-NMR analysis revealed that the physicochemical property of the biocrudes is dependent on functional groups present. The aromatic carbon content of the the biocrude oils showed negative linear correlation with the viscosity of the oils. Phenolic carbons had a positive linear relationship with viscosity. Anhydrosugars and phenolics had a positive linear correlation with density, but the aromatic carbons decreases the density. Carbonyl species appear to have a positive linear effect on the storage stability of the oils; thus increases the rate of viscosity change. Bio-crude carbon content had a negative linear correlation with the formation of residue. Nitrogen content also showed a positive linear correlation with the ph of the oils and so could have a positive influence on corrosion of the oils.

Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge DOE BETO Program and the USTAR Program for financial support.

Thank you!! Questions?