Individualised medicine: regulatory challenges

Similar documents
-Regulation (EC) No.1394/2007 -Regulation (EC) No. 668/2009

Advanced-therapy medicinal products: new competencies in hospital pharmacy Seminar PH4. Relevant Financial Relationships - None

GMO Technology Conference

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

Guide for National Scientific and Regulatory Advice

ABPI response to European Commission consultation on advanced therapy medicinal products

KFDA Regulatory Framework on Biopharmaceuticals - Focus on Biosimilar

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

What are ATMP s: Why do they Require Special Scientific and Regulatory Attention? Christopher A Bravery.

Is there a need for a new regulatory pathway for biologics?

REQUEST FOR AUTHORISATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY: REQUEST FOR OPINION OF THE ETHICS COMMITTEE:

Reflection paper on co-development of pharmacogenomic biomarkers and Assays in the context of drug development

EU scientific regulatory support mechanisms and initiatives for innovation in drug development: the EMA perspective

Global Regulatory Perspective Workshop

Advanced Therapies in Europe

"Stratification biomarkers in personalised medicine"

Recommendation on elements required to support the medical plausibility and the assumption of significant benefit for an orphan designation

FDA Oversight of Gene Therapy

Regulatory Challenges of Global Drug Development in Oncology. Jurij Petrin, M.D. Princeton, NJ

Procedure and experience in Germany

Pharmabiotics: a Regulatory Hurdle in Europe

Beth Hutchins, PhD PhRMA ICH Gene Therapy Discussion Group

Monthly statistics report: December 2017

COMMITTEE FOR THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Supporting Innovation through Scientific Advice

Centralised Procedure and Scientific Advice: an Overview

Overview of Biologics Testing and Evaluation: Regulatory Requirements and Expectations. Audrey Chang, PhD, Senior Director Development Services

INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE: REGULATORY ASPECTS OF DEVELOPING PERSONALIZED CANCER VACCINES

Update on Recast of IVD Directive

This video gives an overview of the centralised procedure at the European Medicines Agency

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

REIMAGINING DRUG DEVELOPMENT:

Regulating Cell Therapy: An Ex-Regulators Perspective

Orphan designation in the EU

European Regenerative Medicine Firms & Their Strategic Approaches. Michael Morrison University of York

Regulatory Considerations and Trends Europe and the U.S.

The European Medicines Agency: a model of patient/consumer interaction

Manufacturing Challenges with Cell and Gene Therapy Products: A Health Canada Perspective

The challenges of potency assay development for cell-based medicinal products in Europe

Update on the IVDR. Sue Spencer

Leveraging an Academic-Industry Partnership for Commercial Success

Regulatory Requirements for CRISPR Therapeutics. Bill Lundberg, MD February 2017

First Annual Biomarker Symposium Quest Diagnostics Clinical Trials

Development of non-substantially manipulated cell-based ATMPs 1 : flexibility introduced via the application of the risk-based approach

Update on Real World Evidence Data Collection

Adaptive Pathways and PRIME: A True Acceleration of Drug Development and Approval?

Global Leader in Viral Vector Technologies

EU health policy. Strategy for the pharmaceutical industry and biosimilars. Salvatore D'Acunto. DG Research. DG Internal Market. DG Health & Consumers

CHANGES TO A GENE THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCT: REGULATORY VIEWS

Comments from the FDA Working Group on SUBGROUP ANALYSES. Estelle Russek-Cohen, Ph.D. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics

Personalised Healthcare Solutions (PHCS) Excellence for your Biomarker-driven Strategies

ACG Public Forum. Join ACG, the FDA, and EMA for a discussion on biosimilars and IBD. Monday, 12:45 pm 2:15 pm

Key concepts of the paediatric regulation and latest developments

INFORMATION ON JAPANESE REGULATORY AFFAIRS

Work programme Adopted by the Management Board on 18 December December 2014 EMA/773839/2014 Rev. 1 Management Board

Cell and Gene Therapy Medicinal Product Management Act (Draft) General Information

378/2007 Coll. ACT of 6 December 2007 on Pharmaceuticals and on Amendments to Some Related Acts (the Act on Pharmaceuticals)

European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM)

Baek, Kyung-min. Recombinant Protein Products Division. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety

INDUSTRY S VIEW ON THE FUTURE OF IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC (IVD) LEGISLATION IN EUROPE. May 2013 SPECIAL REPRINT. By Jesús Rueda Rodríguez, EDMA

The New EU IVDR. Overview of the Main Changes & Clinical Data Requirements. Advance Regulatory Consulting Ltd.

Roche, Roche Molecular Diagnostics and more

National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi

Use of RWE in a regulatory context: issues and examples. Rob Hemmings, MHRA

Update on Regulatory Environment- Europe Experience with 2007/47/EC M5 & Discussions on Possible Recast of EU Medical Device Regulations

Regulatory Pathways for Rare Diseases

Non-clinical Assessment Requirements

Final report on the adaptive pathways pilot

Consultation Paper. European Commission Public Consultation on Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products

Guideline for the Quality, Safety, and Efficacy Assurance of Follow-on Biologics

TECHNOLOGIES & SERVICES FOR THERAPEUTIC ANTIBODY DEVELOPMENT

HPRA: Supporting Clinical Research in Ireland

Non-clinical documentation Overview of Requirements

FACTS. Federal Office for Safety in Health Care

Regulatory Requirements

Regulation of Microbiota- Based Products

Guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and/or intramuscular administration (SCIg/IMIg)

Neue Technologien für die patientennahe personalisierte Diagnostik

REGULATION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS IN PERU. Vicky Roxana Flores Valenzuela General Directorate of Medicines, Supplies and Drugs (DIGEMID)

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

Di Renzo Regulatory Affairs ROME - MILAN - LONDON

European Regulatory Experiences and Expectations of HCP Analysis and Control

Drug Development: Why Does it Cost so Much? Lewis J. Smith, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Center for Clinical Research Associate VP for Research

European Perspectives on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP)

Case Study: Examples Relating to the Quality Control of Cell-based Products

Cell Therapy Services Your Product. Our Passion.

Delivering on the promise: the clinical application of new diagnoses and treatments for RD K A T E B U S H B Y N E W C A S T L E U N I V E R S I T Y

Incentives and Regulatory Considerations in Orphan Drug/Medical Device Development - Situation in Japan -

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

Report from the Paediatric Committee on its first anniversary

Kim Pauwels 1*, Isabelle Huys 1, Minne Casteels 1, Kristina Larsson 2, Caroline Voltz 2, Karri Penttila 3,4, Thomas Morel 1 and Steven Simoens 1

Summary of Provisions in 21 st Century Cures Act (H.R. 6) as passed by full House of Representatives, July 10, 2015

Ready or Not: The New Medical Device Regulations Are Here!

Safety Measures in the new Pharmacovigilance System

PAREXEL GENOMIC MEDICINE SERVICES. Applying genomics to enhance your drug development journey

Transcription:

www.pei.de Individualised medicine: regulatory challenges

Outline Revision IVD Directive Opportunities and challenges Possibilities for interaction http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/gummy_bears.jpg

General revisions Directive 98/79/EC is currently under revision Draft Oct. 2012 Improvement of NB s power: unannounced audits; lab & sample controls Risk based approach following the Global Harmonization Task Force Model: class A (lowest risk) up class D (highest risk) Vigilance & market surveillance: Trend notification, periodic summary reports EU reference labs Revisions specific for IVD: On the way to a companion IVD Definition and classification of companion IVD to risk class C Class C: Mandatory proof of concept by Notified Body (NB) Commercial IVD developer should present to NB: Demonstration of suitability of the companion IVD for the drug Summary of safety & clinical performance, incl. study results Proposed SmPC and PIL Closer connection between NB and Regulatory Agency (EMA; nat. agencies) EMA should be involved in IVD assessment 3

Directive 98/79/EC currently under revision - draft Oct.12 On the way to a companion IVD Currently: Independent not overlapping pathways -> Biomarker + IVD Proposed: Linking of NB & Regulatory Authority -> Towards a companion IVD A. Biomarker development Biomarker evaluation as part of clinical drug development Exploratory phase I /II Phase III (Pre-) Clinical data package EMA MA Vigilance Exploratory phase I /II Phase III Linking technical & specific clinical data package B. Companion IVD development Technical validation & clinical evaluation C. In-House tests 30d procedure NB CE

Personalized medicine: a mixed bag of medicines Number of patients eligible for treatme nt Conventional medicines developed for a unselected population Stratified medicines patients are selected based on biomarkers (for efficacy or safety) Personalised medicines Passively personalised e.g. autologous medicines substances taken from and given to same patient Individualised medicines Actively personalized truly individual medicines: Individual medicines for each patient 1 Degree of individualization

Challenges for all types of individualised medicines Orphanisation Patient populations get smaller (hopefully effect size for efficacy increases!) How to confirm efficacy (standard are two trials) Data set get smaller, higher uncertainties as regards the evaluation of risk More difficult decisions on benefit/risk balance, higher risk of making wrong decision for marketing authorisation How will Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) judge these products in the future? Is there an increasing role for post-licensure studies? What is the view of the payers?

Passively personalised = autologous medicines Drug products manufactured from individuals by a standardised process, e.g. antigen-pulsed autologous dendritic cells for cancer immunotherapy, autologous chondrocyte preparations

Challenges for passively personalised medicines High intrinsic variability in the drug product E.g. donor dependent variability in cell therapy Preclinical challenges Relevant animal models for proof of concept and toxicology Biodistribution Pharmaceutical challenges Potency assays Specifications

However.. Process is the product There is long-standing experience with autologous therapies Passively personalised products are in active development and have reached the clinical environment Haematopoetic stem cells (non-atmp and ATMP) Sipuleucel-T

Actively personalised medicines Drug products manufactured based on specific patients characteristics only for one individual patients

Challenges for actively personalised medicines There is a different drug product for every patient Little to no experience How to define pharmaceutical quality, consistency of manufacturing How to measure potency How to evaluate toxicity in a pre-clinical model How to evaluate mode of action How to estimate risk for clinical trials..

Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) Gene Therapy Cell-based MPs - gm cells and nucleic acids Somatic Cell Therapy immunological SCTs Tissue Engineered Products - ACT, stem cells for tissue repair - recombinant nucleic acids in - viral or non-viral repl.-incomp. vectors, - DNA or RNA, - gm cells, - rec. replicating viruses/micro-org. - engineered cells used for disease -Treatment -Prevention -Diagnosis - engineered cells used for tissue - Regeneration, - Repair or - Replacement

Regulatory landscape ATMPs in clinical trials centrally authorised ATMPs ATMPs approved under HE ( 4 b MP Act-D) legal framework for medicinal products (AMG, TPG, TFG, Regulations..) Clinical evidence on safety and efficacy of medicinal products cannot be obtained outside of clinical trials ATMPs in compassionate use (Heilversuch) ATMPs not placed on the market ATMPs prepared at point-of-care ATMPs in illegal clinical use - unauthorized clinical trial - unauthorized manufacture - unsafe ATMPs ( bedenklich ) legal framework for physicians (Berufsrecht) - supervision by comp. Laender authorities - supervision by medical associations ( Landesärztekammern )

Additional steps to consider on the European level Orphan designation: Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) 40% or 100% fee reduction for CHMP protocol assistance SME designation: SME bureau at EMA Fee reduction when assigned SME status ATMP classification: Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) Fee reduction

PEI Support Marketing authorisation EMA Scientific Advice (CHMP) EMA Certification (CAT) PEI Scientific Advice PEI Innovationsbüro Manu- Discovery Non-clinical Clinical trials facture Therapy, Prevention Support by PEI

Responsibilities at PEI Viral vaccines (prophylactic): virologie@pei.de Bacterial vaccines (prophylactic): bakteriologie@pei.de Therapeutic vaccines: Dr. Thomas Hinz hinth@pei.de Allergens (extracts, recombinant): allergologie@pei.de Antibodies and related products: antikoerper@pei.de Advanced therapies: innovation@pei.de Plasma derived proteins and recombinant alternatives (except antibodies), blood derived cells: haematologie@pei.de Procedural aspects of Clinical trial authorisation: ct@pei.de Uncertain who is responsible: 06103-77-3903 (Annette Stangier, Assistant to ) 16

Research, assessment and licensing of safe and efficacious biomedicines