Session 5: Precast Concrete Floors. Rick Henry Courtesy of University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering

Similar documents
Session 3: Precast Concrete Stairs and Ramps

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

ASSESSMENT OF HOLLOW-CORE FLOORS FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE. Richard Fenwick, Des Bull and Debra Gardiner

DAMAGE TO CONCRETE BUILDINGS WITH PRECAST FLOORS DURING THE 2016 KAIKOURA EARTHQUAKE

Performance of multi-storey reinforced concrete buildings in the Darfield Earthquake

NOTES FOR DESIGNERS AND USERS OF PRESTRESSED PRECAST CONCRETE FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SHELL BEAMS

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

Seismic Performance of Hollow Core Floor Systems Guidelines for Design Assessment and Retrofit

Pile to Slab Bridge Connections

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Introduction to Earthquake Engineering Behaviour of structures under earthquakes

Effect of beam dimensions on structural performance of wide beam-column joints

PERFORMANCE STUDY OF RETROFITTED GRAVITY LOAD DESIGNED WALL FRAME STRUCTURES (SC-140)

Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling & Simulation

Deformation Capacity of RC Structural Walls without Special Boundary Element Detailing

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS

Distribution of Forces in Lateral Load Resisting Systems

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

MIDAS Training Series

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

AN ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF HYBRID STEEL BEAM RC COLUMN CONNECTION

DESIGN OF GRAVITY-LOAD RESISTING FRAMES FOR SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS

Recommendations for additional fire protection of structural elements

MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS DESIGNED TO PRINCIPLES OF DUCTILITY AND DAMAGE AVOIDANCE

NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

ON DRIFT LIMITS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT DAMAGE LEVELS. Ahmed GHOBARAH 1 ABSTRACT

Ground + 4 floor RCC frame structure in Goa Floor to floor height is 3.0m Plan dimension, 24.0 m x 13.5 m SBC = 20 t/sqm, hard Strata is consider for

Feasibility and Detailing of Post-tensioned Timber Buildings for Seismic Areas

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO EARTHQUAKES

The cracking behaviour of reinforced concrete beams under static and dynamic loading

Drift Compatibility of Corner Joints. NEES Webinar #2 December 12, 2014

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 2, Issue 07, 2014 ISSN (online):

NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF NON- SEISMICALLY DETAILED INTERIOR RC BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION UNDER REVERSED CYCLIC LOAD

SEISMIC TEST OF CONCRETE BLOCK INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES

EFFECTS OF COLUMN SPLICE LOCATION ON SEISMIC DEMANDS IN STEEL MOMEMNT FRAMES CONSIDERING SPLICE FLEXIBILITY

Project Findings: Appendix 2

14.1 PCI Standard Design Practice

REHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS

Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Bents used for Accelerated Bridge Construction. Bijan Khaleghi 1

Copyright. magazine. CFS Load Bearing Construction

DESIGN FOR PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE 1

STRENGTHENING WITH WING WALLS FOR SEISMICALLY SUBSTANDARD R/C BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS

SEISMIC RETROFIT OF A TYPICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING THROUGH FRP JACKETING OF EXTENDED RECTANGULAR COLUMNS

Seismic Analysis and Design of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frames

EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR WEAK BEAM-STRONG COLUMN DESIGN IN DUAL FRAME-WALL STRUCTURES

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

Page 53 pren (Final draft)

SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES IN THESSALONIKI

HYBRID MOMENT FRAMES AND UNBONDED PT SHEAR WALLS

Experimental Investigation of Precast, Prestressed Inverted- Tee Girders with Large Web Openings

DETERMINATION OF MOMENT RESISTING RC FRAMES OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTORS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Council on Tall Buildings

COMPUTER SIMULATION OF HOLLOWCORE CONCRETE FLOORING SYSTEMS EXPOSED TO FIRE

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

USE OF 500 GRADE STEEL IN THE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. Prof. M. Shafiul Bari, Ph.D Department of Civil Engg., BUET

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

Behaviour and design of innovative hybrid coupled shear walls for steel buildings in seismic areas

FIB: Commission C6: Prefabrication TG 6.2: Connections. Structural connections for precast concrete buildings. Draft

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Analytical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Exterior RC Beam-Column Joints Rehabilitated with New Scheme

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION OF MULTI-STOREYED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS USING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR THE ESTIMATION OF THE SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF RC FRAMES WITH WEAK INFILL PANELS

Interpretation of SECTION 12 DESIGN AND DETAILING FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADS IS

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

ctbuh.org/papers CTBUH Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

Revise Sections through of Part 1 of the 2009 Provisions as follows:

CYCLIC TESTING OF BOLTED CONTINUOUS I-BEAM-TO-HOLLOW SECTION COLUMN CONNECTIONS

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

Support Action for Strengthening PAlestine capabilities for seismic Risk Mitigation SASPARM 2.0 Deliverable D.C.1

Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using pushover analysis

Damaging Effects of the Pisco-Chincha (Peru) Earthquake on an Irregular RC Building

PORTAL FRAMES 1.0 INTRODUCTION

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

Evaluation of Seismic Behavior for Low-Rise RC Moment Resisting Frame with Masonry Infill Walls

Displacement Based Assessment and Improvement of a Typical New Zealand Building by an Average Engineer

Wood Solutions Fair, 2014, Toronto

Precast Wall Panel Design. By Edward Losch, PE, SE

PEER/CSSC Tall Building Design Case Study Building #1. J. Andrew Fry John Hooper Ron Klemencic Magnusson Klemencic Associates

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

DESIGN OF SELF-CENTERING MOMENT RESISTING FRAME AND EXPERIMENTAL LOADING SYSTEM

Seismic Fragility of Concrete Bridges with Deck Monolithically Connected to the Piers or Supported on Elastomeric Bearings

CONTENT. Self-Centering Earthquake Resisting Systems. Andre Filiatrault, Ph.D., Eng. 1. Introduction

Hollowcore Floors. The ideal structural floor solution for all building types in all sectors.

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS USING CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (CFRP)

Seismic Analysis of Monolithic Coupling Beams of Symmetrical Coupled Shear Wall System

Transcription:

Session 5: Precast Concrete Floors Rick Henry Courtesy of University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering

Background Precast concrete floors widespread in NZ Many advantages with precast units Connections must be adequate to ensure: Diaphragm action (inertia + transfer) Gravity loads

Overview Review of diaphragm behaviour Covered at 2014 Strut and Tie seminars Deformation mechanisms at precast unit supports Design of support connections EQ performance and testing Best practice details

Diaphragm Behaviour [Des Bull 2014 slides]

Function and performance of floor diaphragms Transfer lateral inertial forces to vertical elements of the seismic force-resisting system. F i : floor, beams, columns and cladding EQ Inertia effects, distributed across the floor. C C C Note: the tie T is connected at the interior columns. T

Plastic Elongation of the beams push the columns Loss of floor supports and load paths.??

Case study Canterbury Earthquakes: Clarendon, 1987 Perimeter RC MRF

Red arrows: Beam elongate pushing the corner column away from the floor.

Cold drawn wire mesh fractures from 2 mm to 5 mm.

Loss of Strut load paths. Elongation causes the loss of the load path for the struts. Loss of Strut UoC Report 2010

Diaphragms: Connections or Nodes of the Struts and Ties Column-Beam Node: Traditional view Higher compressive stress - smaller contact surface

Diaphragms: Connections or Nodes Easiest visualisation: Intermediate column act as NODES of truss But middle of beams OK except for corner bays? of the Struts and Ties

Diaphragms: Connections or Nodes of the Struts and Ties Ties provided already as column restraint = 5% Axial load Or a % of shear in columns NZS 3101:2006 e.g. 4 - D16

Deformation Mechanisms in Floors

Earthquake Induced Actions in Multi-storey Buildings Structure conforms to beam sway profile Dominant actions at support connection: 1. Relative rotation induced between flooring units and support 2. Beam elongation in plastic hinges Jenson et al.

Relative Rotation Between precast unit and supporting beam Can develop flexural failure modes in floor unit (both positive and negative moments) After Jenson et al. Worst case = loss of support

Beam Elongation Often 2-4% of the beam depth Increases the distance between the unit supports Displacement incompatibilities Des Bull

NZS 3101 Support connections cl. 18.7.4 Seating details to accommodate rotation and elongation at peak interstorey drifts + 50% larger than ULS earthquake Seating length / detailing Precast unit design Support beam design Fenwick et al.

Precast Floor Unit Connection Details

Link Slabs Displacement incompatibility between the frame and h/c unit Hollow-core unit sags, (applies to any precast floor) Frame deforms in double curvature Des Bull Incompatibility with both single and double bay spans Either floor is designed to deform (+fixed connections), or, isolate floor and frame incompatibility

Link slabs: Matthews, Lindsay & MacPherson Timber in-fill 600 mm NZS 3101:2006 Cl. 18.6.7.2 Des Bull

Link slabs: Maintain struts Struts Ties W N S E Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 1 Des Bull

Hollow-core Extruded prestressed section

Hollow-core CHCH Positive moment cracking Old detailing Credit: John Marshall Fenwick et al.

Hollow-core CHCH Displacement incompatibilities Resolved with modern detailing Credit: Rod Fulford Credit: John Marshall

Hollow-core CHCH Minor spalling of support ledge Newer details Credit: Rod Fulford Credit: Rod Fulford

Hollowcore Support Detail NZS 3101:2006 recommended detail: Prevent rotation damaging brittle hollowcore unit Sufficient seating length

Hollowcore Support Detail Test

Link to UC Research Report 2010-02 Assessment of hollow-core floors for seismic performance http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4211

Double Tees Flange hung or web supported / dapped end High bearing stresses

Double Tees CHCH Credit: Rod Fulford and John Marshall

Double Tees Support detailing Web supported: Armoured (SESOC) Flange hung: Robust hanger

Rib and Timber Infill

Rib and Timber Infill Rib sometimes cast into support Concerns with positive moment cracking Credit: Des Bull

Rib and Timber Infill Positive moment cracking Fenwick et al. Credit: John Marshall Credit: John Marshall

Rib and Timber test

Rib and Timber Infill Support detailing SESOC

Rib and Timber test

NZS 3101 New provisions in A3 for floor seating, when: Interstorey drift > 0.6% or elongation >10mm Seating width calculated, including: Bearing Elongation @ MCE Rotation @ MCE Loss of cover (unit + support) Shrinkage Tolerances

NZS 3101 Support beam ledge: Bearing design (corbel) Armouring when necessary Recommended support details shown in commentary

Design Example [Additional notes]

Seating Length Example 100 mm 300HC 1000? Design insterstorey drift of 2% 600

Seating Length Example 100 mm 300HC 1000 Elongation of parallel hinge (one hinge per end) = calc. @ peak ULS drift x 1.5 (max = 0.036h b ) = 0.036 x 1000 = 36 mm 600

Seating Length Example 100 mm 300HC 1000 100 Elongation is measured at the beam centreline. Additional elongation can occur at the support ledge due to the support beam rotation. 600 Rotation of support beam reducing support: = (peak ULS rotation x 1.5) x height to ledge = (0.02/0.7*1.5) x 100 mm = 5 mm

Seating Length Example 100 mm 300HC 1000 Spalling at back of unit = 20 mm (unarmoured) Spalling of support ledge = face to centerline of longitudinal bars (when in plastic hinge region) = cover (30) + stirrup (10) + ½ bar (10) = 50 mm 600

NZS 3101 A3 Seating width calculated, including: Bearing = 10 mm (check bearing stress) Elongation @ MCE = 36 mm (0.036*1000 mm parallel beam) Rotation @ MCE = 5 mm (0.02/0.7*1.5 100 mm) Loss of cover (unit + support) = 20 mm + 50 mm Shrinkage = 2 mm (assume 0.5mm/m) Tolerances = 17 mm Total = 10+36+4.5+20+50+2+17 = 140 mm Extreme case: Would be less for lower drifts, or could be reduced by armouring ledge

Summary Floors need to accommodate deformations including rotations and elongations in ductile multi-storey buildings Extensive research on recommended connection detailing Preventing damage to floor unit Seating width for larger than ULS earthquake Robust support detailing

Questions?