Witness Addressing or Summarizing. Line Decision No. Proceeding No. Statement or Direction

Similar documents
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER I SOCALGAS AMI VISION AND POLICY

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: February 11, 2015 REGULAR X CONSENT EFFECTIVE DATE N/A

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

ES. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY PROGRAM AREA (R5)

Report of the Market Design and Platform Technology Working Group

Centralizing Your Energy Supply Spend

Energy Trust of Oregon Strategic Plan

ES. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING PROGRAMS (NR1)

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Cost Recovery and Customer Engagement. Dave Defide April 28, 2014

East Bay Community Energy

Marin Clean Energy Applicant Analysis for the County of Napa

Maximizing The Value Of Your Smart Grid Investment

APPLICATION FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER INCENTIVES

Comments of Northern California Power Agency CAISO Load Granularity Refinements Issue Paper. September 20, 2010

THE COMING SMART GRID. Dr. Tom Lawrence, PE, LEED-AP

10 RECAP Waste Management Design Guide Toolkit

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 2017 GENERAL RATE CASE PHASE II PREPARED TESTIMONY EXHIBIT (PG&E-1) VOLUME 1 REVENUE ALLOCATION AND RATE DESIGN

Initial Distributed System Implementation Plan

Costs and Benefits of the Smart Grid. Hans de Heer 10 October 2012

A Roadmap for Electronics Manufacturers: Delivering ROI with MOM Software

INFORMATION SERVICES FY 2018 FY 2020

Principles for the Evolution of Net Energy Metering and Rate Design

Requirements Analysis and Design Definition. Chapter Study Group Learning Materials

Campbell Hawkins, Senior Manager, Edison SmartConnect Program Office

WRITING A SUCCESSFUL SBIR / STTR COMMERCIALIZATION PLAN. Ed Kase Business Development Consultant

Utility Energy Efficiency Programs: Savings Potential, Program Options, and Policy Recommendations

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-100, SUB 126

THE FUTURE ENERGY JOBS ACT A Win for Illinois Clean Energy Economy

GE Digital Energy. Grid IQ Insight. Delivering Operational Insights for Utilities Globally. gimagination at work

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

One-Stop Center Certification in Illinois under WIOA Background and Policy Considerations

DATA AND THE ELECTRICITY GRID A ROADMAP FOR USING SYSTEM DATA TO BUILD A PLUG & PLAY GRID

JULY 2015 [MICRO]GRIDS TODAY. Themes and Outcomes ONTARIO SMART GRID FORUM

Expanded Metering and Telemetry Options Phase 2. Distributed Energy Resource Provider (DERP) Draft Final Proposal

1. Executive Summary Ameren Missouri

SMART METERS, DEMAND RESPONSE AND REAL TIME PRICING: IMPLICATIONS FOR LOW INCOME CUSTOMERS

Smart Pricing Program

PEAK DEMAND REDUCTION STRATEGY

Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

California Grid Operations: Current Conditions and Future Needs

Customer Engagement Plan

PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK

NASEO 2017 Northeast Regional Meeting Energy Storage Initiative. DOER Commissioner Judith Judson

Value of Solar and Grid Benefits Studies

Pacific Gas and Electric Company Advanced Metering Infrastructure Semi-Annual Assessment Report SmartMeter Program Quarterly Report March 2011

Innovating for the Road Ahead. Oracle Utilities Customer Solution

Expanding Hydropower and Pumped Storage s Contribution to Grid Resiliency and Reliability RFI#: DE-FOA

Smart Meters The Impact on Customer Service Operations

Causes of residential electricity bill changes in Victoria, 1995 to prepared for: Victorian Electricity Distribution Businesses

Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption Using Electric Rate Feedback Loops

Smart Grid Concept, Applications and Lessons Learned from Recent Deployments

Opportunities for Home Energy Management Systems (HEMS) in Advancing Residential Energy Efficiency Programs

Self-Assessment for the CoSN Certified Education Technology Leader (CETL ) Certification Exam

Visionary Leadership. Systems Perspective. Student-Centered Excellence

Aon Risk Solutions Higher Education Practice. Higher Education. We Understand Your Risks. Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources.

Application Migration to the Cloud C L O U D A N A L Y T I C S D I G I T A L S E C U R I T Y

CHAPTER 4 ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BENEFITS

STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. At a session of the Public Service Commission held in the City of Albany on June 17, 2015

Smart Grid Demonstration Final Report. MLGW President s Briefing January 17, 2013

Phasor measurement units gain credibility through improved test and calibration standards

The Total Economic Impact Of the Horizon Project at TalkTalk Forrester Consulting

Optimization: The Next Frontier

LONG ISLAND LONG ISLAND

Benefit-Cost Analysis Summary Report

Multi-family Program Overview 1

Con Edison. Evolution of Con Edison efforts in Energy Efficiency and Demand Management:

EFQM MODEL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO ANY ORGANISATION

Energy Conservation at the University of Pittsburgh - FY2014 and Beyond

SRS CONSULTING INC 2009 SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW

Business Continuity Maturity Model Margaret D. Langsett Executive Vice President Virtual Corporation

Connected customers The transformation imperative for Utilities in a digitally disrupted world

C&I Energy Efficiency Retrofit Custom Programs Portfolio Evaluation

Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company (d/b/a/unitil) Grid Modernization Plan

Low Income Customers and Time Varying Pricing: Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities

NEWFOUNDLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATA RESPONSES TO THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE. Provide a copy of the report to the Board concerning Newfoundland

Ramp Up to the New Revenue Standards in the Subscription World: Zuora

Quality Management System Guidance. ISO 9001:2015 Clause-by-clause Interpretation

Customer Energy Efficiency Solutions

The key performance indicators of the BIM implementation process

SMART CITIES SMART GRID REFUELING INFRASTRUCTURE SENSORS, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING SYSTEMS HUMAN FACTORS

Market System Evaluation. June 2017

Industrial GreenPrint. Become a Strategic Manager of Your Energy Resources

COMMENTS OF THE PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION ON PJM'S CAPACITY PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL. September 17, 2014

IMPROVING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PLANNING TO INCORPORATE DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES

Grid Operations and Planning Area Strategic Plan

Meter Data Management Systems. Position. Vice President, Product Management. November 29 December 1, 2010 Santo Domingo Dominican Republic

Content areas for the Comprehensive Exam

Tariffs January 1, 2017

Benchmarking of Demand Response Potentials Final Report:

EfficiencyOne 2018 Business Plan

PROMONTORY, AN IBM COMPANY QUANTITATIVE SOLUTIONS CASE STUDY: Stress-Test Model Development

End-User Computing in Today s Virtual Era. The Pros and Cons of Desktop Virtualization

SGMM Model Definition A framework for smart grid transformation

EXPANDING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES IN PORTLAND, OREGON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

October 1, 2016 September 30, 2017 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN

PACIFICORP DEMAND-SIDE RESOURCE POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT FOR

Revenue for chemical manufacturers

Supplement to The One Page Business Plan by Jim Horan

Building Effective State Floodplain Management Programs. Strategic Planning Methodology and State Guidance

Transcription:

Page 1 of 8 1 C11-0139 10A-124E 2 C11-0139 10A-124E 3 C10-1077 10I-099EG 4 C10-1077 10I-099EG To assist in developing a robust strategic plan [and] identifying a suite of future applications, Public Service should use such techniques as an advisory group of academics, researchers, and customers. The Company should also avail itself of Commission Information Meetings to keep the Commission informed of its process and to solicit ideas for future applications of SGC technologies. In short, we want to see the Company articulate and defend a strategic plan for the SGC investment. We want to see the credible promise of consumer and utility benefits sufficient to justify the cost... We want to know more about the ability of customers to make practical use of SCG on their side of the meter through in-home devices, and we want to know more about the interconnect ability of SGC with those customer devices. The Commission has a long-standing practice of using costbenefit analysis when evaluating the merits of utility investments. We expect that utilities will bring forward smart grid projects in the future and note that smart grid investments may be particularly well-suited to such cost-benefit analysis. Smart grid technologies are often discussed as a whole and not by specific components. We find that there may be value in considering the technologies on a disaggregated basis. Further, certain smart grid components, especially utility-facing components, may have stand-alone justification. We believe utilities should move forward to implement components that are clearly cost-effective. There is no reason to insist that the entire suite of technologies be installed at the same time, or even at all. Borchardt

Page 2 of 8 5 C10-1077 10I-099EG 6 C10-1077 10I-099EG An effective smart grid implementation must be governed by consistent standards, particularly for interoperability and cyber security. This Commission is aware of the challenges of estimating and incorporating societal benefits in decision-making. Resource planning and demand-side management (DSM) are two examples where the Commission is required to make such estimates. We find that the benefits of smart grid investments fall into two general categories: (a) those benefits that are currently known and quantifiable (such as anticipating equipment replacements prior to failure, or improving responses to outages); and (b) societal benefits that are more harder to estimate and relate to public policy objectives (such as the potential to reduce system-wide carbon dioxide emissions). We find that the positive externalities potentially attributable to smart grid investments should be factored into the Commission decision-making. We also note that these benefits, given that they often rely upon other independent factors (such as the development of a robust electric vehicle market), may be relatively more difficult to quantify, and may lend themselves to creating an overall cost-benefit adder (percentage margin from break-even) for use in cost-benefit analyses. Reimer Harkness 7 C10-1077 10I-099EG We find that meter supported time variable rates can benefit electric system in terms of more efficient operations and deferring capital investments in generation. We also understand that whether such rates are optional or mandatory has a significant effect on the ability of the rates to yield the desired system benefits. We therefore conclude that such rates should be pursued when and only when clearly beneficial to the system.

Page 3 of 8 8 C10-1077 10I-099EG It is clear that the residential customer class is not homogeneous when it comes to electric usage and commensurate service needs and expectations. We observe that this diversity will likely influence how customers interact with smart meter technology. This leads us to conclude that the pros and cons of converting all meters, and applying time-sensitive rates (as opposed to targeting conversions to specific types of customers), should be further evaluated. Such targeting might take into consideration customer characteristics such as total usage, amount and time of peak demand, and power quality requirements. The Commission must find a balance between the benefits of upgrading all meters and the costs of upgrades that yield little value to specific customers. We find this issue must be explored in specific utility applications. 9 C10-1077 10I-099EG... We preliminarily support adoption of a "checklist" for the utilities to follow when filing a smart-grid related application. We observe that the application standards being developed by the Illinois Statewide Smart Grid Collaborative provide such a framework for utilities to organize their applications for rate recovery of smart grid investments (See Illinois State Smart Grid Collaborative draft documents at www.ilgridplan.org). We believe this framework may be useful in Colorado as well. N/A: no rate recovery requested in this proceeding.

Page 4 of 8 10 C11-0406 10I-099EG... Since the cost justification for smart meters will likely rely, at least in part, on benefits resulting from expected shifts in consumer behavior, we note that significant consumer education efforts are critical. Consumer education is necessary to mitigate the risk that these benefits will not be realized due to lack of consumer awareness, knowledge, or interest. 11 C11-0406 10I-099EG 12 C11-0406 10I-099EG We conclude that detailed consumer education plans should be filed in the smart meter applications developed via formal rulemaking as discussed in paragraphs 10 and 11. These plans should determine the most effective, cost-controlled consumer engagement methods and strategies to achieve minimum participation necessary to realize expected benefits. Thorough consumer segmentation studies need to underlie these consumer education plans. Consumer education plans should also involve a plan for stakeholder collaboration and propose multiple channels for consumer engagement. Furthermore, through the formal rulemaking, we envision developing performance metrics specifically tied to consumer education and engagement that could include quantifications of consumer awareness, understanding, interest, participation, and satisfaction. The rulemaking discussed above should address whether achievement of performance benchmarks using these performance metric targets related to consumer education and engagement should ultimately be connected to cost recovery.

Page 5 of 8 13 C11-0406 10I-099EG We conclude that electric utilities should be directed, through a rulemaking, to file periodic smart grid plans with the Commission. We envision these plans addressing anticipated investments in smart grid technologies associated with the utility's entire system, from generation to the customer meter. We envision that a smart grid plan would explain the function, cost, and objectives of each smart grid investment, including direct benefits and anticipated and synergistic benefits.... 14 C11-0406 10I-099EG Separate and distinct from the smart grid plan discussed above, we conclude that when utilities anticipate upgrading automated meters to smart meters, they should submit to the Commission a smart meter plan in the form of an application. We envision this as a component of the future rulemaking discussed in paragraph 10, above. Without limitation, we offer the following as possible components of such a plan: number and type(s) of meters to be installed; quantified goals associated with the meters (over time), such as impact upon usage, peak load, demand side management (DSM) participation, etc.; minimum consumer participation levels required to achieve the goals; cost/benefit analysis calculations and underlying assumptions; a detailed consumer education and outreach plan, including underlying consumer segmentation study; and an assessment of potential detrimental impacts on low-income and other vulnerable consumer groups. Application All witnesses

Page 6 of 8 15 C11-0406 10I-099EG 16 C10-1077 10I-099EG 17 C10-1077 10I-099EG 18 C10-1077 10I-099EG 19 C11-0406 10I-099EG 20 C11-0406 10I-099EG... We conclude that system-wide smart meter implementation concurrently with system-wide changes in rate design is likely to elicit negative customer reactions, regardless of the quantity and quality of the associated customer education undertaken.... We also note that the "diffusion of innovation" concept, which explains how product acceptance occurs in a market, is applicable to smart meter implementation. The targeting of smart meters and dynamic pricing to the segment of residential customers most receptive, while limiting short-term benefits to the overall system, also limits the negative customer reactions that, if unabated, can preclude achieving any long-term benefits. (a) the utility's proposal to implement a substantial and comprehensive consumer education program, options for phasing in any smart grid proposal, options for timing of rate design changes, and other matters that may influence consumer adoption of smart grid technologies; (b) the utility's assessment of the anticipated adverse financial impacts of reduced kwh on cost recovery; and (c) the utility's proposal to address and compensate for identified adverse financial impacts. (i) Utilities should incorporate the "diffusion of innovation" concept into smart meter and dynamic pricing implementation planning; initially, smart meters and dynamic pricing should be optional and their promotion targeted. (ii) Through customer segmentation and targeted marketing, those customers most desirous of these changes should be engaged first, gradually moving outward through segments. N/A: no rate recovery requested in this proceeding. N/A: no rate recovery requested in this proceeding. Borchardt

21 C11-0406 10I-099EG 22 C11-0406 10I-099EG (iii) As smart meter implementation is expanded across a service territory, some customers may be interested in staying with the current rate. Such an option makes sense in the near term to reduce negative customer reactions, yet, over time these customers should be "nudged" toward increased interaction with the smart meter, by gradually making the default option more dynamic. (iv) Utilities are encouraged to develop the core competencies of customer segmentation and targeted marketing associated with offering products into a diverse and dynamic market. Such skills, which are integral to the success of a smart meter/dynamic pricing implementation, should be secured as either internal resources or by engaging outside expertise. Attachment AKJ-2 Page 7 of 8 (i) Consumer segmentation and behavioral analyses with 23 C11-0406 10I-099EG insights into consumer interests and motivations, responsiveness to dynamic prices, and assessments of relevance of results to service territory as a whole; 24 C11-0406 10I-099EG (ii) Comparison of various feedback strategies with varying technological complexity and cost; and 25 C11-0406 10I-099EG (iii) An assessment of the effectiveness and cost of various consumer education and outreach approaches, including implementation of stakeholder involvement and multi-channel strategies. 26 R10-0546-I 10A-124E The costs of the program subject to recovery. 27 R10-0546-I 10A-124E The benefits that accrue to customers from the program. 28 R10-0546-I 10A-124E The benefits that accrue to the Company from the program (e.g. goals of the program, value of intellectual property rights). 29 R10-0546-I 10A-124E Whether project benefits justify the cost.

Page 8 of 8 30 R10-0546-I 10A-124E 31 R10-0546-I 10A-124E 32 R10-0546-I 10A-124E 33 R10-0546-I 10A-124E 34 R10-0546-I 10A-124E Quantification of the cash, non-cash and intellectual property contributions. The on-going maintenance expenses associated with the [project] investments. The need for ratepayer investments to obtain the full benefit of [project] benefits. The appropriate size, scope, and scalability of the [project] investments. Whether the existing facilities are functionally inadequate or unavailable. 35 R10-0546-I 10A-124E Ownership of intellectual property rights. 36 R10-0546-I 10A-124E The Online Account Management system, including both fiscal and environmental effects. TBD as part of vendor selection. Harkness Nickell Borchardt