AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4)

Similar documents
AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Tool Getting Started

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

T4 Floor Truss Example. AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 3D FEM Analysis Tutorial Steel Diaphragm and Lateral Bracing Specification Checking Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8. Truss Tutorial. T5 - Truss Enhancements

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Solid Shaft Pier Example

MIDAS Training Series

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

CSiBridge Version Release Notes

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

STANDARD MBTC-4: NOTES TO DESIGNER

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

Structural Analysis Models and Their Advancing Technologies

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND PARAMETRIC STUDY OF CURVED CONCRETE BOX GIRDER USING ABAQUS SOFTWARE

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

Principal Bridge Engineer Middle East & India Atkins Abu Dhabi, UAE

PENNDOT e-notification

Design of Short Span Steel Bridges

2008 Bridge Load Rating Class 101

Chapter 3: Designing Steel Bridges Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E. July 2006

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

Inventory Inspection and Load Rating of a Complex Segmental Concrete Bridge. Presented by Matthew J. Lengyel, PE, SE

TXDOT ENGINEERING SOFTWARE SUPPORT INFORMATION. Prestressed Concrete Girder SUPERstructure Design and Analysis Program (PGSuper TM )

Dead man sheet pile wall (SI units)

Design Aids of NU I-Girders Bridges

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

STANDARD BWL-1: NOTES TO DESIGNER

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

1. Stress Analysis of a Cantilever Steel Beam

PUNCHING SHEAR STRENGTH OF GFRP REINFORCED DECK SLABS IN SLAB- GIRDER BRIDGES

Sensitivity Analysis of Rail-Structure Interaction Force Effects for Direct-Fixation. Bridges

Nonlinear Redundancy Analysis of Truss Bridges

Live Load Distribution Factors Suitable For Concrete Bridges Under Ecp 201 And Euro Code 1991 Loading

Seismic Analysis of Truss Bridges with Tall Piers

Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems

V B D S. Visual Bridge Design System. S. Q. Wang, Ph.D., P.E. and Chung C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Distributed By

Example. Monday, October 19, 2015

Live Load Test and Finite Element Analysis of a Box Girder Bridge for the Long Term Bridge Performance Program

BRADD Software Executive Summary

NOVEMBER 2017 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 14-1

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 1, 2012

Seismic Analysis & Design of 10 Story RC Building

Proposal. PricewaterhouseCoopers Oslo, Norway

STUDY ON TALL BUILDING STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

Behaviour of Concrete Filled Rectangular Steel Tube Column

Behavior of a multiple spans cable-stayed bridge

Rail Track Analysis Wizard

SEISMIC DESIGN STRATEGY OF THE NEW EAST BAY BRIDGE SUSPENSION SPAN

Stability of Precast/Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS METHOD

System reliability models for bridge structures

Route 360 Inverted T-beams. Carin Roberts-Wollmann Virginia Tech Tommy Cousins Clemson University Fatmir Menkulasi Louisiana Tech

FIELD TESTING AND LOAD RATING REPORT: THE MILO ADVENTIST ACADEMY S COVERED BRIDGE

AUGUST 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1

TECHNICAL REPORT 2 BUILDING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOADS

FAQ. for Midas Gen Link, Preference and Drawings. Design + Solution for Structural Member Design with Drawing & Report

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE ADAPT-MAT USER MANUAL. Copyright November 2017

CONCRETE SPLICED GIRDERS IN TEXAS. Nicholas Nemec, P.E. TxDOT-BRG

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS. Michael D. Hyzak, PE 1 Gregg A. Freeby, PE 2 Lloyd M. Wolf, PE 3 David P. Hohmann, PE 4 John M.

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF SLAB AND T-GIRDER REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGES

Minimum slab thickness of RC slab to prevent undesirable floor vibration. Technology, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh. 2.

Types Of Roofs - Vault

HAMBRO COMPOSITE FLOOR SYSTEM

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Shear Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Beams

EVALUATION OF STEEL BRIDGE TRUSS SYSTEMS BY CONVERSION TO EQUIVALENT BOX GIRDERS

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF HIGH RISE STEEL BUILDINGS INCLUDING P-DELTA EFFECTS

Mechanical Performance of Composite Truss Bridge with Double Decks

Behavior and Analysis of Horizontally Curved Composite Steel Girder Bridge System

Hyperstatic (Secondary) Actions In Prestressing and Their Computation

THE NEW AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION 2008

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NORMAL AND SKEW BRIDGE OF PSC BOX GIRDER

The use of 0.5 and 0.6 in. (13 and 15 mm) diameter

US 34 OVER THE MISSOURI RIVER: DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF A HAUNCHED STEEL PLATE GIRDER WITH SUBSTRINGER BRIDGE

Design studies of the Castle Bridge over Wislok River in Rzeszow with application of CAD System

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Bridge Beams/Girders

Influence of Distributed Dead Loads on Vehicle Position for Maximum Moment in Simply Supported Bridges

Itani, A.M., Reno, M.L. "Horizontally Curved Bridges." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling & Simulation

HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE. by John J. Roller CTLGroup

VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGY TO REPRESENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

Application of Tensioned CFRP Strip Method to an Existing Bridge

SERVICEABILITY LIMITS AND ECONOMICAL STEEL BRIDGE DESIGN

JULY 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1

Transcription:

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4) Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-1 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4) Topics Covered 3D analysis of a single span steel rolled beam bridge Diaphragm definitions 3D analysis settings 3D model This example describes performing a 3D FEM analysis of a single span steel rolled beam structure. Open the Bridge Workspace for STL8. Open the Diaphragm Definition window shown below. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-2 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

The following window shows a diaphragm definition that can be assigned to locations in the Framing Plan window. Steel bridges may contain any of the 4 types of diaphragm definitions. Concrete bridges may only contain Type 4 diaphragm definitions. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-3 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

The Superstructure Definition window contains the following settings to control the 3D analysis. The analysis of all member alternatives in the superstructure definition will use the following engine and specification set on the Specs tab. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-4 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

Open the Framing Plan Details: Diaphragms tab to see how diaphragm definitions are assigned to the framing plan. The weight of the diaphragms will be computed by the software and applied to the 3D model. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-5 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

For the Bridge Design training, open the Analysis Settings window and make the following selections for an HL93 Design Review: Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-6 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

For the Bridge Rating training, open the Analysis Settings window and make the following selections for an HS20 rating: Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-7 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

For both training sessions, select the following output controls: Sit on the superstructure definition and launch the analysis. The software develops the 3D model using the member alternative marked as Existing for each member. If the member does not have a member alternative marked as Existing and only has 1 member alternative, that member alternative is used for the 3D model. If the member has no member alternative marked as Existing and more than 1 member alternative, the analysis will not be performed. Spec checking and rating is only performed for member alternatives marked as Existing. For this sample bridge, the spec checking will only be performed for the member alternative for member G2. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-8 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

The following shows the output files created by the 3D LRFD design review. Similar files are created for a 3D Std rating. The 3D Model files list the data for the models including nodes, members, properties and loads. The 3D Model Actions files list the FE results (reactions, element actions, displacements) for the models. The Model Graphics files can be opened to graphically view the FE models. The following shows the graphics for the Stage 1 model which contains the steel beams and diaphragms. Node and element numbers can be turned on from the Tools menu. The mouse controls manipulation of the view. Zoom by rolling the mouse wheel. Translate by pushing down the mouse wheel. Rotate by pushing down the left mouse button. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-9 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

The generated influence surfaces for the unit live loading can be viewed by selecting the Stage 3 Graphics model and then selecting File/Open/ Influence Surfaces.sur. An influence surface for viewing can be chosen by selecting Tools/Change Influence Surface and then selecting desired actions. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-10 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

Tabular results and spec check details can be viewed for the member alternatives that were analyzed. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-11 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

The results of the HS20 rating are shown below: Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-12 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

3D Model The modeling techniques used are the result of a survey of researchers and practitioners and review of several software packages. Steel beams are modeled with: Shell elements for the deck Beam elements for the top and bottom flanges Shell elements for the web Deck (Shell Elements) A Rigid Links Flange (Beam Elements) Web (Shell Elements) Flange (Beam Elements) Section Partial Elevation View of Model Reinforced concrete beams are modeled with: Shell elements for the top flange Beam elements for the girder Deck/Top Flange (Shell Elements) A Beam Elements at c.g. of beam Rigid Links Reinforced Concrete Section Partial Elevation View of Model Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-13 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

Prestressed concrete beams are modeled with: Shell elements for the deck Beam elements for the girder Deck (Shell Elements) A Rigid Links Beam Elements at c.g. of beam Partial Elevation View of Model Prestressed Section The moment at a beam cross section is calculated by solve the equilibrium equations at that section. This moment is then used in the specification check articles in the same way that it would for a line girder analysis. Deck (Shell Elements) A Rigid Links Flange (Beam Elements) Web (Shell Elements) Element Nodal Forces M Flange (Beam Elements) Section Partial Elevation View of Model Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-14 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4

Mesh Generation The FE model created by BrR/BrD will contain nodes at the following locations: Cross section property change points Span tenth points Support locations Diaphragm locations User defined points of interest The user controls the mesh generation by the controls previously shown on the Superstructure Definition: Analysis tab. The software creates the mesh following the number of elements selected between beams or within the web of a steel beam and the target aspect ratio entered by the user. The presence of nodes at the locations listed above may result in some elements falling outside the target aspect ratio. The following plan views show how the mesh for this example can be controlled by the user. 3 shells between beams, target aspect ratio = 2 4 shells between beams, target aspect ratio = 1 Loading The program computes all of the dead loads acting on the beam including the self-weight of the beam, user defined appurtenances on the structure typical section, wearing surfaces, diaphragms and user defined member loads. Composite dead loads are applied directly to the deck shells in the 3D model in their actual location. They are not distributed to the girders based on the choices available in the Superstructure Loads window. The Stage 3 FE model is loaded with unit loads at each deck node within the travelway to generate influence surfaces for the beam. Lane positions and combinations are determined based on the travelway and the transverse loading parameters set by the user on the Superstructure Definition: Analysis Settings tab. The influence surfaces are then loaded with the selected vehicles to find the maximum live load effects. Last Modified: 7/26/2012 STL8-15 AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.4