Pollution Tolerance Index Bag of Bugs

Similar documents
How Sensitive Are They?

Aquatic Insect Lab Practical

POLLUTION TOLERANCE INDEX (PTI)

Land Use Activities Potential Pollution Problems. Land Disposal septic system bacteria, nitrate, phosphate

Benthic Macroinvertebrates (BMI) Identification

Water Wonders. Purpose. Materials. Overview. Student Outcomes. Time. Level. Part 1: Part 2: Part 3 (optional):

Macroinvertebrates What Wetland Bugs Can Teach Us

Stream Observation Data Sheet School: Charleroi Middle School Date 9/24/15 Stream Study Site: Maple Creek. Macroinvertebrate Survey

Macro Invertebrates STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Stream Observation Data Sheet School CMS Date 12/16/2015 Stream Study Site Mingo Creek. Macroinvertebrate Survey

Life at the Surface. Adapted from: Life at the Surface and A Tense Place to Live? in Living in Water. National Aquarium in Baltimore, 1997.

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring

Water Quality and Macroinvertebrates By Teresa Matteson and Heath Keirstead Benton Soil & Water Conservation District

River of Ashe County, NC

Missing Macroinvertebrates. Missing Macroinvertebrates

The development of the Big Pond Dip invertebrate survey method

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates and Stream Ecology

Dirty Water. Adapted from: Dirty Water in Living in Water. National Aquarium in Baltimore, Grade Level: all. Duration: 1-2 class periods

Activity 1: Using the Level of Oxygen- Saturation Chart graph Dissolved Oxygen vs. Temperature at 100% saturation. Start by making a 2 column table.

Water Quality: The Basics

Parts Per Million. Vocabulary: MCL, MCLG, ppm (parts per million), dilution

Introduction to Water Quality Parameters

SAMPLING YOUR ESTUARY Level IIB WHAT S IN THE WATER?

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

Macroinvertebrate Investigation

Trout Are Made of Trees: How Are Leaves Important to Streams?

Summary. calculated. ebrates they have identified. to the. entire life crayfish. the type of. mayflies, tolerant to. common in.

Summary. River. 5 th 8 th. about the. Chemical. anteceden. Grade Level: 5 th. 12 th. Objectives: instructions to. determine the. Chicago River Field

Missouri Streams. Fact Sheet. What factors affect stream habitat? Stream Habitat Affects Aquatic Communities

Micro Odyssey Phytoplankton, Zooplankton

Bugs, Brook Trout, and Water Quality: How Are They Connected?

Environmental Literacy Question: How have humans affected the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed?

Measuring Turbidity with Filters

Bugs Don t Bug Me Lessons plans and hands-on activities about aquatic macroinvertebrates and water quality for K-6 students

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

Maumee Area of Concern Water Quality Database Development

Riffle Beetles to Riparian Buffers

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Effect of Dissolved 0xygen on Water Quality I. Science Grade Level Indicators.

A Local Ecosystem. Year 11 Biology. The Wetlands Centre. The Wetlands Environmental Education Centre

Comparison of Total Phosphorus and Macro Invertebrates and the Impact of Land Use on Water Quality. Laura Roldán Isardo Braverman Puerto Rico

Macroinvertebrates as bioindicators

Eau Galle River - Cth D R.Mi-13.0, Eau Galle River. Latitude: , Longitude: Jo Van. Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016

9. Evaluation Mechanisms

The Cycling of Matter

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Aquatic Ecology Field Study Procedures

Chemical Testing of Drinking Water

Wetland Animals. Grade Level: Basic or intermediate. Duration: 30 minutes 1 hour. Setting: Classroom

CITIZEN MONITORING AS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT TOOL. Reesa Evans Lake Specialist Certified Lake Manager Adams County LWCD

7 Energy Flow Through an Ecosystem NOW THAT YOU are familiar with producers and consumers,

Linda Cooper, Eno River State Park, Durham, NC

VIDEO: Freshwater Wetlands

Lichens as Biomonitors

A study of the benthic macroinvertebrate composition of the Kings River and its major tributaries to determine the water quality of the catchment.

Hamilton Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Index of Watershed Indicators: An Overview

Ontario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Ontario Envirothon Learning Objectives

Mayflies on the Move!

EUTROPHICATION. Teacher s Manual

Name That Source. Point and Nonpoint Sources

Stream Ecology. Physical Characteristics

Invertebrate differentiation in various microhabitats of small and medium lowland rivers

Water Quality Indicators: Biological, Chemical & Physical Parameters

A Biosphere in a Bottle

Stream health assessments: comparing scientific and cultural indices

Appendix D3. Aquatic Resources. Tennessee Valley Authority Reservoir Operations Study Final Programmatic EIS

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

Life on Earth National 5 biology Measuring abiotic factors

Transparency A Water Clarity Measure

Food Web Invaders TEACHER LESSON PLAN BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION MATERIALS NEEDED LEARNING OBJECTIVES VOCABULARY. Length minutes

Web of Life. The energy starts with the sun. Light energy is captured and transformed into chemical energy

Halifax County Schools 2 nd Grade Science Pacing Guide 1st Six Weeks Goal Activities Essential Questions Vocabulary

Lakes and Ponds. Questions to consider. Ponds breathe. Sinkhole pond. Oxbow lake. Farm pond. Reservoir

Soil Quality How can we improve soil quality?

The Social and Economic Importance of Canada s Privately Owned Forest Lands

Reporting Period: 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010. Understanding the Level 2 Stream Monitoring Data Report

1. Jill made the table below during her research on aquatic zones and living organisms. Based on Jill s observations, which conclusion could you draw?

ECOSYSTEMS, WATERSHEDS AND POLLUTION CONTROL REVIEW

AP Environmental Science

Part I: Salish Sea Introduction. Review:

Food webs Work sheet (Middle years)

Diversity Index. Grade Level: Subject: Science, Math. Time Required: Three 50-minute periods. Setting: Indoors and outdoors

Georgia Performance Standards Correlations

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Water Pollution. Environmental Science

riveredge NATURE CENTER Determining Water Quality Teacher s Guide February 2011

Applicable TEKS. Duration. Objectives. Prerequisites. Materials. Procedure. L E S S O N LESSON 4 Water Pollution

Biological Indicators

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

TOPIC TEACHER GRADE. How do humans impact the Earth

Appendices. Support Documents. The following documents are available in the Support Documents component of the SCEI Web Site

EXISTING AND READILY AVAILABLE DATA

Water Smart Connections

Eutrophication: Too Much of a Good Thing?

Biology Ecology Unit Chapter 2 Study Guide

William S. Schmidt Outdoor Education Center WOODLAND ECOLOGY- ORME

WHY DO WE NEED NITROGEN?? Nitrogen is needed to make up DNA and protein!

Transcription:

Pollution Tolerance Index Bag of Bugs Adapted from: An original Creek Connections activity. Creek Connections, Box 10, Allegheny College, Meadville, Pennsylvania 16335. Aquatic Macroinvertebrates - Pollution Tolerance Grade Level: basic, intermediate Duration: 45 minutes Setting: Classroom Summary: Students will interpret a fictitious macroinvertebrate sampling to determine water quality using a biological assessment and pollution tolerance index classification. Objectives: Students will develop an understanding of how and why to perform a Pollution Tolerance Index, which uses macroinvertebrates to determine the health of a waterway. Vocabulary: Macroinvertebrates, benthic, indicator organism, biodiversity, pollution tolerance index, tolerance level, sensitive, facultative, tolerant Related Module Resources: Macroinvertebrate Sampling activities [binder] Pollution Tolerance Index Methods for field [binder] Various Macroinvertebrate Articles and Fact Sheets [binder] Books/Field Sheets Video: SOS For America s Streams Video: Creatures of the Pond Reference Collections Microscope Slides (bugs) Kick nets and D-frame nets Materials (Included in Module): Bags of Bug Pictures [envelope] Additional Materials (NOT Included in Module): None ACADEMIC STANDARDS (ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY) 7 th Grade 4.3.7.A Identify environmental health issues. - Identify various examples of long-term pollution and explain their effects on environmental health 4.3.7.C Explain biological diversity. Explain how diversity affects ecological integrity of the natural resources. 4.7.7.A Describe diversity of plants and animals in ecosystems. - Select an ecosystem and describe different plants and animals that live there 4.7.7.B Explain how species of living organisms adapt to their environment Explain how living things respond to changes in their environment Explain how one species may survive an environmental change while another might not. 10 th Grade 4.1.10.C Describe the physical characteristics of a stream and determine the types of organisms found in aquatic environments. - Describe and explain the physical factors that affect a stream and the organisms living there - Identify terrestrial and aquatic organisms that live in a watershed - Identify the types of organisms that would live in a stream based on the stream s physical characteristics 4.3.10.C Explain biological diversity as an indicator of a healthy environment. - Explain species diversity 12 th Grade 4.1.12.C Analyze the parameters of a watershed. - Interpret physical, chemical and biological data as a means of assessing the environmental quality of a watershed - Apply appropriate techniques in the analysis of a watershed (e.g., water quality, biological diversity, erosion, sedimentation) 4.6.12.A Analyze the interdependence of an ecosystem Analyze the positive and negative impacts of outside influences on an ecosystem 4.6.12.C Analyze how human action and natural changes affect the balance within an ecosystem. Analyze effects of human action on an ecosystem. 4.7.12.A Analyze biological diversity as it relates to the stability of an ecosystem. Examine and explain what happens to an ecosystem as biological diversity changes Explain the relationship between species loss and biodiversity. BACKGROUND: Macroinvertebrates are organisms without internal skeletons that can be seen with the unaided eye (often considered larger than 0.5mm). Reference to the term aquatic macroinvertebrates can include arthropods (insects in all life cycle stages, nymph, larva, pupa, or adult or crustaceans or arachnids), mollusks, and worms. Examples of aquatic macroinvertebrates include mayfly nymphs, stonefly nymphs, dragonfly larvae, midge larvae, crayfish, leeches, aquatic worms, and water beetles. Some of these creatures are called benthic (bottom-dwelling) macroinvertebrates, which

means they live in, move along, or attach themselves to the waterway bottom or substrate. Not all aquatic macroinvertebrates remain on the bottom though some swim through the water or live on the surface. Indicator organisms are creatures that are sensitive to changes in water quality and will react to changes in their environment in predictable ways. Aquatic macroinvertebrates are one group of such organisms. Because different aquatic macroinvertebrates have different levels of tolerance to pollution, the amount of stress a stream is under can be measured by the organisms that live in that stream. Environmental degradation decreases the number of different types of organisms in a community by eliminating sensitive creatures while increasing the number of tolerant ones. This decreases the biodiversity (number of different forms of life) of the stream. The Pollution Tolerance Index (PTI) is a means of measuring stream quality based on indicator organisms and their tolerance levels. Tolerance levels refer to the amount of pollution the organisms can handle before dying or moving to another habitat. By sampling a measured area of a waterway, usually a total of 3 square meters, and determining which macroinvertebrates are present and which are not, the pollution levels of a stream can be determined. The indicator organisms are grouped into three categories based on their tolerance of pollution conditions. These categories are: Sensitive (Group I)- The presence of sensitive organisms generally indicates good water quality because these macroinvertebrates cannot survive under polluted conditions. Facultative (Group II)- These organisms can exist under a wider range of water quality conditions than sensitive organisms can. Therefore, they are found in fair-quality water and good-quality water. Tolerant (Group III)- The heartiest organisms, they are tolerant of pollution. In large numbers, they point to poor water quality conditions, but can also be present in good and fair water quality. Each of these indicator groups is assigned an index value, with the least tolerant group having the highest index value. The index score for a stream is based on the number of indicator organisms present per group. In good-quality streams, each macroinvertebrate group should be represented, though there will probably be more sensitive organisms than tolerant or facultative organisms. Finding a worm or midge larva (both tolerant organisms) does not mean the stream is polluted, as long as the majority of the sample is from the sensitive range. However, a net full of worms and midges with no sensitive organisms will give a stream survey rating of poor. A Pollution Tolerance Index is a common way for stream ecologists to assess the health of a waterway through biological methods. Chemical, bacterial, and land use monitoring exist as well to provide more information on the health of a stream. Although chemical tests are frequently used, they have limits that can be overcome with biological sampling.

For instance, chemical monitoring may miss a pollutant in the stream because the kit used may not include tests for that particular substance. Also, chemical testing is only a snapshot determination of stream health and pollution for that moment. Results may suggest a stream is clean even if it is polluted the other 364 days in the year. Macroinvertebrates are subjected to day to day and longer term changes in pollution, oxygen levels, and acidity levels. With their constant contact with the water, most scientists believe that the PTI better reflects the overall condition of a stream. OVERVIEW: Students will interpret a fictitious macroinvertebrate sampling to determine water quality using a biological assessment and pollution tolerance index classification. PROCEDURE: 1. Separate students into at least 4 groups and distribute bug bags to each group. Share bags between groups if needed. Each bag has a different assortment of organisms in them, simulating different stream health levels. See the chart at the end of this activity for information about the contents of each bag. 2. Have each group take three small handfuls of bugs from their bag. This part of the activity simulates three 1 square meter kick net samples that are taken at the stream. 3. Next, have the each group sort ALL of their bugs into piles of same organism. 4. Have the students count the number of individual macroinvertebrates they have for each organism and record it on the Pollution Tolerance Index data sheet (at the end of this activity). They should record the number on the first line next to each macroinvertebrate name. **NOTE- There will be some extraneous bugs in the samples (and in real waterways) that are not listed on the Pollution Tolerance Index. These bugs will not be given an index ranking and will not be scored. To find out why, read the discussion section. There are also blank scraps of paper in some bags that should not be counted. ** 5. As stated on the Pollution Tolerance Index data sheet, students should assign a letter code based on each macrionvertebrate s abundance. R (rare) = 1-9 organisms C (common) = 10-99 organisms D (dominant) = 100 + organisms 6. You may want to have students overview their data sheet and have them discuss/predict whether they have a biologically diverse stream and whether they think their stream is going to receive a healthy score. 7. To determine the water quality rating of their stream on the back of the data sheet, students must take the total number of letter rankings (not total number of organisms) per index group and multiply it by the assigned weighting factor. The water quality score is then determined by the sums of the index values for each group. Good >40 Fair 20-40 Poor <20

8. Have the groups share their results with the entire class. DISCUSSION: Make sure students are aware that this classroom simulation is an actual research procedure that they could do at a real waterway. Scientists use various types of biological assessments to determine the health of a waterway using aquatic insects, fish, algae, and plants. There are many versions of pollution tolerance indexes used by various organizations and government agencies, but this version for aquatic insects is actually encouraged to be used by all volunteer water monitoring groups in Pennsylvania. Why do scientists like to use aquatic macroinvertebrates to determine stream health? See background section. Discuss the water quality ratings of the streams that were sampled. What observations do students have about the number and types of organisms in the different streams? Did streams that had many different types of organisms score better? Yes. Why do they think a stream or any ecosystem is considered healthier/better quality if it has more biodiversity? If you discover little aquatic life living in your waterway, why then is chemical testing of the water useful? To determine the specific pollutants or poor conditions that may be in the creek and keeping aquatic creatures from living. For example, you might find out that there is too much acid, not enough dissolved oxygen, or high metal concentrations. Why were some organisms (such as the water strider, dragonfly larva, backswimmer) not counted in the Pollution Tolerance Index? Not all aquatic insects are counted in the PTI because not all insects are affected directly by water pollution. Insects that live underwater and rely on it for food and breathing are only counted. So bugs that live on the water surface are not counted because they obtain their oxygen from the air. No matter how polluted the stream was or depleted of oxygen, they could still breathe and live on the water. Some insects that liver underwater, such as dragonflies, are not counted because they can rise to the surface and obtain air from the atmosphere, then go back underwater. Some dragonflies even can live out of the creek or in a dry creek bed under rocks as long as there is just a little moisture. If you notice on the PTI form, many beetles that live under water are also NOT counted because they too take oxygen from the surface then go back underwater. So a polluted stream void of oxygen does not have much effect on them either. What problems might be causing stream pollution that negatively affects aquatic life? (Acid rain can decrease the ph of the water to a range that some organisms cannot function at. Erosion loads sediment into a stream, creating murky water and ruining macroinvertebrate habitat. Likewise, urban areas produce runoff that can contain toxic

chemicals and sediment. Agricultural areas may add fertilizer runoff into the stream, causing increased algal and bacterial growth. There are many other examples as well.) EVALUATION: Be able to identify and name organisms that are tolerant, facultative, and sensitive. Explain why macroinvertebrate sampling is important for determining stream health. Correctly filled out Pollution Tolerance Index data sheet. EXTENSIONS AND MODIFICATIONS: Use the Pollution Tolerance Index to determine the stream health value of an actual stream with the class (See Macroinvertebrate Sampling activity). Have students draw pictures of the different streams that their paper bugs samples were obtained. Encourage them to illustrate what may have caused the differences in water quality between the sites. If there stream scored badly, make sure their picture includes possible causes the reduced their stream s biodiversity. NOTES (PLEASE WRITE ANY SUGGESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR TEACHERS USING THIS ACTIVITY IN THE FUTURE): Activity Version: October 2001

PTI Activity: Paper Aquatic Insects Bags of Bugs Information Sheet Color of Paper Fictitious Quality Level Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Extra Notes Stream Name of Stream Organisms Organisms Organisms Blue Tionesta Fair 4 Species 6 species 2 Species No Stonefly No Damsel No Midge Mayfly or Caddisfly or Scud Leech, or Snail Yellow Goldenrod Poor No Species 5 Species 5 Species (all) No Crane, Crayfish Scud, or Netspinning Caddis Orange Hawkwood Good 7 Species (all) 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) Red Rimrock Good 7 Species (all) 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) Purple Hickory Fair 1 Species 6 species 3 Species Only Mayfly No Damsel or Scud No Leech or Snail Green Evergreen Good 7 Species (all) 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) Brown Tarbuck Fair No Species 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) Pink Chaney Poor No Species 3 Species 3 Species *Blank scraps do not Lots of Damsels count for anything Peach Richardson Poor No Species 3 Species 3 Species *Blank scraps do not Lots of Damsels count for anything Gray Willow Poor No Species 3 Species 3 Species *Blank scraps do not Lots of Damsels Hot Pink Saw Mill Good 7 Species (all) 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) Blue Woodcock Good 7 Species (all) 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) Yellow/Orange Thompson Good 7 Species (all) 9 Species (all) 5 Species (all) count for anything