Smart Growth for Mobile Policy Document

Similar documents
Vero Beach Vision Plan

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

Purpose of the Countywide Transportation Plan SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

IX. STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

CRTPA Regional Mobility Plan Attachment 1 Agenda Item 4E Page 1 of 11

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

ENVIRONMENT LONG-TERM GOAL: INTRODUCTION: Environment 117

PARCEL P-12 DEVELOPMENT & URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

City of Buffalo Common Council Edward Hawthorne University at Buffalo Law Student

General Plan. Energy Element. Adopted February 15, 1979 Amended November 9, 2011 Amended September 26, 2017

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES

Chapter 1. Introduction

RE: Jackson Row - truck route

1.1.1.b. Agencies share best practices as they integrate COMPASS facilitates

Transportation Concurrency

Infrastructure Financing Programs (DIF)

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Wheaton PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS

Civil Engineering and Architecture Detailed and Performance Objective Outline

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION 9-1

NORTHWEST TERRITORIES CONSOLIDATION OF CAPITAL AREA DEVELOPMENT SCHEME BY LAW NO. 3934

FERRY COUNTY COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES

Transit Oriented Development Strategic Plan for Bhopal

Funding for this guidebook was provided through the Genesee Transportation Council s Unified Planning Work Program

LMPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Table of Contents

Administrative Hearing Staff Report

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE Project Funding and Scoring Criteria

III. King County Guiding Principles

Putting Smart Growth to Work in Rural Communities

Subarea Mobility Enhancements. 5.1 Transit and Pedestrian Improvements

City of Brantford Chapter 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

A THRIVING MIDDLE GEORGIA

Transit Oriented Development Study

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

Port Authority of Eastlake Park Planning Project Steering Committee Meeting

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE COMMITTEE REPORT: Silver Line Comprehensive Plan Amendment Update

PINELLAS COUNTY MOBILITY PLAN SUMMARY REPORT

CITY OF ELMHURST SUSTAINABILITY POLICY

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Chapter 10 Land, Public and Private

Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor

Nāʻālehu/Wai ōhinu/green Sands

Appendix A: Initial Cost Analysis Calculations

Plaza 4 Urban Renewal Plan

2013/14 City Manager Goals Overview. May 19, 2014

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

6.0 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts

YAKIMA COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICY

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Recommendations of the Tree Task Force. Presented to the Land Use and Transportation Subcommittee. May 8, 2006 Austin, Texas

Master Plan. Summary

Planning Commission November 20, 2013 URBAN FORESTRY LANDSCAPING CODE UPDATES

Memorandum. Da,e /olz[n~ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng

CAPITAL REGION LAND USE PLAN

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Zoning Code and Design Guidelines. Department of Community Development. October 7, Tricia Stevens #46. Planning and Environmental Review

development services strategic plan

(Added by Ord , File No , App. 7/3/2003) (Derivation Former Administrative Code Section 5.239; added by Ord , File No.

B-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Uses allowed in the B-2 Community Commercial Business District are subject to the following conditions:

2. Discussion and possible recommendation to the Board of Trustees and the Plan Commission

Connecting Cleveland 2020 Citywide Plan TRANSPORTATION & TRANSIT

Everett Transit Action Plan Open House and Community Meeting

LAND DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING FORUM 2014 THE 2014 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Overcoming Barriers to Mixed-Use Infill Development: Let s Get Trip Generation Right

2007 Town of Carolina Beach CAMA Land Use Plan

CHAPTER 6: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 6: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6-1

NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR MIDDLESEX COUNTY

Public Hearing January 13, Request Conditional Use Permit (Auto Repair Garage) Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith

PLANNING, LICENSES AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES. Wednesday, August 30, :00 PM Council Chambers

Tax Increment Finance: An Emerging Community Revitalization Tool

Chapter 4: Natural and Scenic Resources and Environment

Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Training Aid

40 Science Hall 550 N. Park Street Madison, WI wicci.wisc.edu

GOAL 13 ENERGY CONSERVATION

Managing Growth and Development

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Chapter One LAND USE ELEMENT INTRODUCTION

Community and Urban Forestry The Benefits of Trees

North Carolina Urban Forest Council. Recognizing Excellence in North Carolina Urban Forestry

CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS Uptown Corridor Improvement District Authority Meeting Minutes August 26, 2009 Annex of Wealthy Theatre / 1130 Wealthy Street SE

Year of Vibrant Green Space Celebration Committee

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Notwithstanding article VII of this chapter, the following conditional uses may be permitted in the planned mixed use development (PMUD) zone:

REGULAR MEETING BELVEDERE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 10, 6:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM I & COUNCIL CHAMBERS 450 SAN RAFAEL AVENUE, BELVEDERE, CA MINUTES

1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400 Oakland, CA Fax:

City of White Plains Westchester County, NY. Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Rogers Road Small Area Plan Task Force Final Report. DRAFT Report. January 12, 2009

GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICY

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration and Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

INTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS

Preparing for the Future in Troup County, Georgia

How Urban Growth Boundaries strengthen communities and protect greenbelts

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

Corridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Transcription:

Smart Growth for Mobile Policy Document Prepared by the Urban Development Department Planning Staff in cooperation with Mayor Michael C. Dow January 2003

Smart Growth for Mobile Policy Document In May of 2002, Mayor Michael C. Dow directed the Urban Development Department to begin a new planning initiative for the City of Mobile entitled, Smart Growth for Mobile. The purpose of this initiative is to develop planning policies and practices to address the manner in which inevitable growth and development will occur in Mobile. Like most American cities, Mobile s prevailing development practices have greatly contributed to inefficient land use practices, increased traffic congestion, consumptive development of environmentally sensitive areas, and wasteful use of city infrastructure and resources. To tackle these and other issues, the Smart Growth Steering Committee was formed to establish a Smart Growth Policy to guide Mobile s development process and to offer alternatives to existing development standards. Appointed by Mayor Dow, the Steering Committee is comprised of representatives from the City of Mobile Planning Commission and City Council, environmental professionals, members of the development community, representatives from the Mobile Chamber of Commerce, other governmental agencies and city staff. Using the expertise of this Committee, this policy document was created to develop a comprehensive framework used to guide the city s development future. The policies outlined within this policy document are intended to offer an alternative approach to development. These policies should not be viewed as development mandates. Although highly encouraged based on their ability to improve the city s function and livability, these policies are in no way meant to serve as additional development requirements or regulations. Smart Growth policies for Mobile merely offer a viable development option capable of effectively dealing with continued and foreseeable growth and redevelopment. Methodology The purpose of the Smart Growth Policy Document is to provide a framework of policies and informed decisions regarding Mobile s development future. The following Action Plan describes the process used to develop this document. A flow chart of this process is illustrated in the Appendix A. Establish Steering Committee Committee appointed by Mayor; members consisting of representatives of the Planning Commission and City Council, environmental professionals, members of the development community, representation from the Chamber of Commerce, governmental agencies and city staff.

Introductory Meeting Sustainability Assessment of Mobile s current growth trends and adopted land use policies supporting Smart Growth principles. Discussion of overall goals, scope and charge of the Committee and time line for completion of charge. Policy Meetings Five half-day meetings were held once a month in 2002 to discuss/establish policies and implementation strategies. Each meeting focused on one of the following Smart Growth policies: Design Alternatives, Development Incentives, Strengthening the Existing Community, the Preservation of Open Space and Critical Environmental Areas, and Transportation Alternatives. Consensus Meeting The Committee decided and agreed upon a series of objectives based on the five established Smart Growth goals. These goals and objectives identified by the Committee are the basis for this Smart Growth Policy document. Smart Growth Policy Formulation As discussed earlier, the purpose of this policy document is to provide a framework for decision-making regarding local development practices. To accomplish this goal, the Smart Growth Steering Committee has met over the past six months to explore the Smart Growth development concept, its principles, as well as the formulation of policies applicable to the City of Mobile development process. As a result of these meetings, the Smart Growth Steering Committee formulated a series of goals and objectives which represent policies for Smart Growth. Upon adoption, policies identified in this document will provide a plan of action for the execution of the Smart Growth Implementation Initiatives Document to be developed in the next several months. The Steering Committee has reached consensus on its Smart Growth policies and is now seeking adoption from the Mobile Planning Commission and the Mobile City Council. The following is a list of objectives identified for each of the broad Smart Growth policies. I. Design Alternatives Establish neighborhood character through compatible street, development type, scale and design elements. Page 2

Encourage mixed use development by integrating neighborhood oriented businesses of compatible scale into residential areas, and residential uses into commercial areas. Improve streetscapes through landscaping, traffic calming, and walking/biking trails. Improve the functionality and design of commercial uses through architectural style, alternative parking, and improved accessibility. Reinforce and maintain community character by designing community gateways, designating areas for open space development, and by encouraging infill development. II. Strengthen the Existing Community Develop infill development strategies to attract potential residents and businesses to existing areas. Adopt infrastructure strategies targeting redevelopment to existing areas having substantial infrastructure and located where major public facilities are already in place. Revise all appropriate codes and ordinances to eliminate excessive and/or restrictive development standards. Address barriers to the redevelopment of Brownfield Sites. Provide community information on proposed infill developments. III. Preservation of Critical Environmental Areas and Open Space Encourage and promote conservation of environmentally valuable areas. Provide walkable, enjoyable green space contributing to community character while maximizing natural habitat preservation. Advocate open space development that conserves natural areas, provides community recreational space, and promotes watershed protection. Improve water ways for recreational use by reducing soil and contaminant runoff. Minimize floodwater volume increases attributable to increased impermeable surfaces. Protect water quality from soil and other contaminant runoff caused by unmanaged construction practices. Page 3

IV. Investment in Multi-Modal Transportation Options Coordination of the land use and transportation planning processes to more effectively locate transportation systems in proximity to residential developments and community services. Roadway design that considers connectivity accessibility, function, and speed as they affect the safety and security of non-motorists, such as pedestrians and bicyclists. Coordination with other transportation agencies to focus on and develop alternative modes of transportation, resulting in less reliance on the automobile. Provide Americans with disabilities easy access to sidewalks, streets, parks, and other public and private services. Implementation Initiatives Upon adoption of the Smart Growth Policy Document by the Mobile Planning Commission and the City Council, the next phase of implementation will involve the development of specific measures employed to carry out the above outlined Smart Growth policies. For each Smart Growth policy, subcommittees will be formed. The subcommittees responsibility will be to develop implementation initiatives for each policy. Facilitated by the planning staff, the subcommittees will meet independently of the Steering Committee to develop initiatives for each policy. Initiatives identified by the respective policy sub-committee will detail specific implementation measures. Where appropriate, the expertise of outside agencies will be solicited to assist the sub-committees in the development of specific initiatives to address policies previously identified in this document. The outlined strategies will then be used to develop the Smart Growth Implementation Initiatives Document. After consensus is reached by the Steering Committee, this document will then be forwarded to the Mobile Planning Commission and the City Council for adoption, as well as all appropriate agencies for specific action. Page 4

Appendix A Steering Committee Policy Making Process Design Alternatives Development Incentives Strengthen Community Preserve Open Space Transportation Steering Committee Consensus Meeting on Smart Growth Policies Steering Committee Policy Document Smart Growth Policy Document Adoption by Planning Commission and City Council Formulation of Subcommittees to develop Implementation Initiatives for each Smart Growth Policy Implementation Initiatives Adoption by Planning Commission and City Council Review & Adoption by Appropriate Agencies or Departments Implementation and Continuous Monitoring

Appendix B Smart Growth for Mobile Steering Committee Members Mayor Michael C. Dow Mr. Christopher Lee Mr. John Bell Mr. Frederick D. Richardson, Jr. Mr. Ben Brooks Mrs. Connie Hudson Dr. Judy Stout, Ph.D. Mr. Herbert Guy Captain David W. Yeager Dr. Harold Dodge, Ph.D. Mr. James M. Apple, III Mr. Bob Hyman Dr. George F. Crozier, Ph.D. Ms. Emily Sommer, CCM Mr. Robert S. Frost Mr. Terry Plauche Dr. Victoria L. Rivizzigno Ms. Mickie Russell Mr. Richard Weavil Mr. Terry Harbin Mr. Malcolm Steeves Mr. Willard Rogers Mr. Jeb Schrenk** Ms. Wanda Cochran Mr. Steve Walker Mr. Stillman Knight Ms. Casi Callaway Mr. M. Don Williams, III Mr. John Saint Ms. Jennifer White Ms. Tina Sanchez Planning Staff Ms. Laura J. Clarke Ms. Margaret Pappas Mr. Richard Olsen Ms. Shayla Jones Ms. Jennifer Henley ** Mr. Schrenk reported on Steering Committee Meetings, but was not a member of the Steering Committee