Aspinall Unit Overview

Similar documents
Considerations for Modeling a Water Bank at the Aspinall Unit with Current Environmental Flows

United States Department of the Interior

Spring Forecast Based Operations, Folsom Dam, California

Missouri River Basin Water Management

CAP Excess Water Task Force

The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply

Record of Decision for the Navajo Reservoir Operations, Navajo Unit.. San Juan River New Mexico, Colorado, Utah Final Environmental Impact Statement

South Platte River Importance of Return Flows and Replacing Depletions to Down-Stream Water Users

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study. Navigating the Future of the Colorado River Natural Resources Law Center June 9, 2011

ANNUAL PLATTE RIVER SURFACE WATER FLOW SUMMARY

Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update

DES MOINES RIVER RESERVOIRS WATER CONTROL PLAN UPDATES IOWA ASCE WATER RESOURCES DESIGN CONFERENCE

Recent RiverWare and RiverSMART applications on the Colorado River Basin RiverWare User Group Meeting August 24, 2016

Overview of Truckee Meadows Water Resources

Planning Beyond the Supply/Demand Gap: Water Supply Vulnerabilities in New Mexico Presented by NM Universities Working Group on Drought

Competing objectives for the Colorado River Can we have it all?

Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

Los Angeles 3 rd Regional

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

Myths and Facts about a Drought Year in the San Joaquin Valley

Tri-County Water Conservancy District Water Conservation Plan

Situation and Outlook of the Canadian Livestock Industry

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Virginia and North Carolina (Section 216)

Hoover Dam Hydropower and River Operations Electric Market Forecasting Conference. Mark Cook, PE Manager, Hoover Dam

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

TROA & Improved S2S Forecasting An Opportunity Jeanine Jones, CDWR

Electric Forward Market Report

For Bandon Utilities Commission

OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

Hood River Basin Study

Shortage on the Colorado River: Analysis of Impacts to Water Users in Central Arizona. Ken Seasholes

SOUTH FORK AMERICAN RIVER (CHILI BAR), CALIFORNIA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 4 STATE OF COLORADO TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF PREPARATION/ NOTICE OF INTENT. Proposed Lower Yuba River Accord June 2007 Draft EIR/EIS

HAY PRICES AND TRENDS IN WESTERN STATES

The Florida Ranchlands Environmental Services Project (FRESP)

Central Valley Project (CVP) Operations: In Brief

Reorienting the Bureau of Reclamation

RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM SECTION 7 CONSULTATION, SUFFICIENT PROGRESS, AND HISTORIC PROJECTS AGREEMENT October 15, 1993 (Revised March 8, 2000)

Letty Belin Senior Counselor to the Deputy Secretary. U.S. Department of the Interior NCAI National Tribal Water Summit October 9, 2016

Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

What Are Environmental (Instream) Flows?

Science Supporting Policy: The Case For Flow Quantity

Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change: A California case study

United Water Conservation District November 2016 Hydrologic Conditions Report 2017 Water Year. December 6, 2016

Presentation to Green River Basin Advisory Group

March 16, The Honorable Donald J. Trump President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W. Washington, DC 20500

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Instream Flow Study for the Proposed Lower Bois d Arc Creek Reservoir, Texas

SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWALS & LOW FLOW PROTECTION POLICY MICHAEL COLLEGE, P.E. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Saline Water - Considerations for Future Water Supply. Bruce Thomson Water Resources Program UNM

The Confluence Model. Presentation to Modeling and Forecasting Working Group January 21, 2015

Over 150 Years of Irrigation Implications for Montana s Water Resources

The State of the Colorado River

National Integrated Drought Information System Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Chattahooche-Flint River Basin. 14 August 2012

Hydro-climatic modelling workshop UNSW - MDB Water policy challenges and innovation

Section 2. Mono Basin Operations

How do we meet current and future water needs? Niklas Christensen, PE Watershed Professionals Network

BC Hydro Generation system operation Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

PREPARE60 OVERVIEW 1

Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study. WRRC 2013 Conference University of Arizona Tucson, AZ March 5, 2013

NBI strategic water resources analysis Phase I findings

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Overview of the Instream Flow/Fish Habitat Element of the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project. By Jeremy Freimund, P.H.

CHAPTER FIVE Runoff. Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323) Instructors: Dr. Yunes Mogheir Dr. Ramadan Al Khatib. Overland flow interflow

Grand Valley Regional Water Conservation Plan

Powder/Tongue River Basin Plan Executive Summary

EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES RESPONSE TO METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT IN THESSALY, GREECE

Feed Grain Outlook June 2, 2014 Volume 23, Number 33

Lower Yuba River Redd Dewatering and Fry Stranding Study 2008 Annual Report

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

THE WYOMING FRAMEWORK WATER PLAN

Agri-Service Industry Report

Upper Arkansas Voluntary Flow Management Program. Arkansas Basin Roundtable May 10, 2017

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

The Non Market Value of Water in Oklahoma

Using Adaptive Management at Glen Canyon Dam

global science solutions

Interruptible Supply Study

L e s s o n 1 INTRODUCTION TO HYDROELECTRIC POWER

The Effect of Draining Lake Powell on Water Supply and Electricity Production. Spreck Rosekrans

Climate Change & Urbanization Have Changed River Flows in Ontario

Overview of the Surface Hydrology of Hawai i Watersheds. Ali Fares Associate Professor of Hydrology NREM-CTAHR

Dairy Outlook. April By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

OSAGE RIVER BASIN OPERATIONS WATER MANAGEMENT

Utah State Group: Lake Powell Pipeline. Meaghan Stertzer Jon Flechsenhaar Christian Nelson Brandon Shepherd

Effects of projected climate change on energy supply and demand in the Pacific Northwest and Washington State

Northern Arizona Hydrogeology

Chehalis Basin Strategy Programmatic SEPA Draft EIS

APES- Water Diversions Name: Brandon Tran

Cape Town water outlook 2018

REYHER FARM. Diverse Agricultural Business Located In Southeast Colorado For Sale. 7,000+/- ACRES OFFERED AT $19,500,000

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

SCOTT RIVER HYDROLOGY AND INTEGRATED SURFACE WATER / GROUNDWATER MODELING

Water Operations 101. Jerry Johns and John Leahigh Department of Water Resources BDCP Steering Committee 5/8/09

Economic Contribution of Idaho Agribusiness

Transcription:

Aspinall Unit Overview Dan Crabtree Erik Knight Sandi Caskey Jennifer Hamilton US Bureau of Reclamation Western Colorado Area Office Grand Junction, Colorado

Reclamation Service of 1902 In Early 1900 s irrigation projects were know as reclamation projects Irrigation would reclaim arid lands for human use President Roosevelt supported Reclamation movement Believed reclamation would permit homemaking Create homes for Americans on family farms Reclamation Service established in 1902 within USGS Reclamation Act required that: Nothing in this act shall be construed as affection or intended to affect or in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water

Delta Colorado, 1904

Imperial Valley, CA 1901 Irrigation 500,000 Acres 2.6 million Ac-Ft Water Right

Hydraulic Mining

The Colorado River Basin

Colorado River Compact 1922 agreement among the seven states in the Colorado River basin. Divides the river basin into the upper basin and the lower basin. Requires the upper basin states to not deplete the river flow below 75,000,000 acre-feet for any ten consecutive years. Upper Basin has to deliver an average of 7.5 million acre-feet each year. 1,500,000 acre-feet per year is allocated to Mexico. The lower basin can receive an additional 1,100,000 acre-feet per year.

Colorado River Storage Project After the Colorado River Compact, a study was done to determine how to best regulate the flow of the Colorado River to ensure compliance. CRSP provides water storage, hydroelectric power, and flood control for participating states along the upper Colorado River. CRSP is made of four major units. Flaming Gorge Unit Aspinall Unit Navajo Unit Glen Canyon Unit Other than the four storage units, there are a total of 21 participating projects (16 of which have been completed).

Glen Canyon Flaming Gorge CRSP Storage Projects Navajo Dam Blue Mesa Dam

Gunnison Basin Map

The Aspinall Unit Made up of three dams Blue Mesa Dam Morrow Point Dam Crystal Dam Originally named the Curecanti Unit. Name changed to the Aspinall Unit in 1980 to honor Colorado Congressman Wayne N. Aspinall. The three reservoirs have a combined live capacity of 964,065 acre-feet, and can produce enough electricity to support a community of 240,000.

Blue Mesa The largest body of water entirely in Colorado. 20 miles long with 96 miles of shoreline. The surface area is 9,180 acres. Is the largest lake trout and Kokanee salmon fishery in the United States. Has a live capacity of 829,500 acre-feet. Water source is the Gunnison River. Over a million people visit Blue Mesa each year for recreation.

Blue Mesa Ground Breaking July 7, 1962 Left to Right Representative Wayne Aspinall Governor Stephen McNichols Senator John Carrol Reclamation Commissioner Floyd Dominy

Morrow Point Morrow Point Dam s primary purpose is hydroelectric power generation. Has a live capacity of 117,025 acre-feet, and a surface area of 817 acres. It is a concrete double-arch dam, and was the first dam of its type built by Reclamation. Its water source is the Gunnison River.

Crystal Crystal dam s primary purpose is hydroelectric power generation. Has a live capacity of 17,540 acre-feet. Water source is the Gunnison River. When water is needed from the Aspinall unit, releases are adjusted at Crystal.

Power Plants Morrow Point

Endangered Fishes of the Colorado River Basin Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius Razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus Humpback chub Gila cypha Bonytail Gila elegans

Hydroelectric Power Generation Authorized Purposes Aspinall Unit Environmental Impact Statement Five generators at three powerplants. Blue Mesa annually averages 264,329,000 kilowatt-hours. Morrow Point annually averages 343,450,000 kilowatt-hours. Crystal annually averages 167,771,000 kilowatt-hours. 800,000 megawatthours total. This is enough energy to supply the annual electricity needs of about 64,000 households. Power is sold to municipalities, public utilities, and governmental agencies in WY, UT, CO, NM, AZ, and NV. Deliver irrigation water to farms. Provide municipal and industrial water to communities. Regulate river flow. Provide for flood control and recreation. Provide storage and delivery of water for irrigation, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes. Improve water quality. Improve conditions for fish and wildlife. Generate electric power. The EIS modifies the operations of the Aspinall Unit to provide sufficient releases of water at times, quantities, and duration necessary to avoid jeopardy to endangered fish species and adverse modification of their designated critical habitat while maintaining and continuing to meet authorized purposes of the Aspinall Unit.

Peak Q (cfs) Peak Flow Targets at Whitewater Peak flows will be made in an attempt to match the peak from the North Fork in order to maximize the potential of meeting a desired peak at Whitewater. Peak and duration is determined by Blue Mesa forecasted inflow. 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 900 cfs DRY Peak Flow Target at Whitewater MOD DRY AVG DRY AVG WET MOD WET WET 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Forecast BM Apr-Jul Inflow (thousand af)

Base Flow Targets at Whitewater Gage Drought Rules During Dry and Moderately Dry years, if Blue Mesa Reservoir content drops below 600,000 af, the Whitewater baseflow target is reduced from 1050 cfs to 900 cfs until Blue Mesa Reservoir content exceeds 600,000 af Flow recommendations came from a study done by the Fish and Wildlife Service. Table shows the base flow targets at Whitewater gage.

Park Water Right Black Canyon of the Gunnison 2009 Decree quantifying National Park reserved right. Settled through mediation with 300 objectors. Water right - 1 day peak flow, shoulder flows, and minimum flows based on forecasted inflow. Gives highest priority to flood control. Actual 24 Hr Peak 845 cfs 814 cfs May 1 Forecast 230 KAF

Inflow (cfs) Content (AF) Aspinall Operations 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 April - September Blue Mesa Reservoir Comparison with Long Term Average 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 Inflow 2012 Content 2012 Inflow avg Content avg

Apr-Jul streamflow % avg CBRFC Basic Forecast Methods Statistical regression Simulation modeling S Fork Rio Grande, Colo Snow Rainfall Heat Soil water Snow pack Runoff May 1 snowpack % avg Credit: Tom Pagano

Aspinall Operations

Time inflow is exceeded Aspinall Operations 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2002 2012 Blue Mesa Reservoir April - July Unregulated Inflow 408 DRY 519 AVERAGE WET MODERATELY WET WET MODERATELY DRY 647 2011 AVERAGE DRY 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 879 1037 Unregulated Inflow (1000 AF) 2002 = 156 Kaf 2011 = 893 Kaf 2012 = 206 Kaf Based on 1937-2011

Flow (cfs) Aspinall Operations 4500 Gunnison River - Black Canyon 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 300 cfs Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 2012 Average

Flow (cfs) Aspinall Operations 9000 Gunnison River @ Whitewater 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 2012 Average Baseflow Target

Pikeminnow at Redlands

Dallas Creek Project Primary facility is Ridgway Dam. Has a live capacity of 82,980 acre-feet. Its water source is the Uncompahgre River. It is CRSP participating. Irrigates 11,200 acres. Livestock Crops such as alfalfa, meadow hay, pasture, small grains, pinto beans, malt barley, corn, onions, and some fruit. 28,100 acre-feet is available for municipal and industrial uses in Colona, Montrose, Olathe, Delta, and surrounding areas. Recreation opportunities. Aids in the reduction of groundwater overdraft.

Paonia Project Primary facility is Paonia Dam. It has a live capacity of 15,553 acre-feet. Its water source is Muddy Creek. Sedimentation problems CRSP participating Irrigates 15,300 acres. Dairy cows and beef cattle Livestock feed, apples, peaches, and cherries. Reduces flood dangers on the North Fork River. Provides recreation opportunities.

Uncompahgre Project Primary facility is Taylor Park Dam. Has a live capacity of 106,185 acre-feet. Its water source is the Taylor River. Not CRSP participating. Irrigates 76,297 acres. Alfalfa, wheat, corn, oats, potatoes, beans, barley, onions, and fruit. Free camping and picnic grounds. Provides recreation opportunities.

Colorado Projects

Ridgway Had total melt-out on 6/15, which is 12 days before average; however, snowpack had been down 5-10 since March 13 and it maintained.5 for nearly a month, during which time it s usually melting down from 9. 700.00 Ridgway Inflow Reached maximum pool elevation 6/9. The reservoir was at 92% of capacity, and 107% of average for that time of year. 90000 Ridgway Storage I n f l o w i n c f s 600.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 A F 85000 80000 75000 70000 65000 60000 55000 50000 45000 40000 2002 2012 25 Year Average 2002 2012 25 Year Average Capacity

1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct Paonia 900.00 Paonia Inflow 18000 Paonia Storage I n f l o w i n c f s 800.00 700.00 600.00 500.00 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 A F 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0.00 0 2002 2012 22 Year Average 2002 2012 23 Year Average Capacity

1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct Taylor Park 900 Taylor Park Inflow 120000 Taylor Park Storage I n f l o w i n c f s 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 A F 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0 2002 2012 24 Year Average 2002 2012 25 Year Average Capacity

Questions? Sunset on Blue Mesa Reservoir by Adam Schallau Photography