Speed your time to market with FDA s expedited programs

Similar documents
PDUFA VI Public Meeting Remarks of Cynthia A. Bens Alliance for Aging Research. August 15, 2016

THE FDA, THE DRUG APPROVAL PROCESS, AND THE PATIENT VOICE

Insights into the Rare Disease Drug Approval Landscape: Trends and Current Development

Regulation of Microbiota- Based Products

Expanded Access to Investigational Imaging Drugs

Managing Risk and Uncertainty Through the Drug Life cycle. Recent FDA Initiatives. Theresa Mullin, PhD

McKinsey Center for Government What's Driving the Recent Surge in New Drug Approvals?

Office for Human Subject Protection. University of Rochester

Regulatory utilization of Flexible Regulatory Pathways to meet unmet medical need

Regulatory Challenges of Global Drug Development in Oncology. Jurij Petrin, M.D. Princeton, NJ

Guidelines: c. Providing the investigational drug for the requested use will not interfere with the initiation, conduct, or completion of clinical

Utilizing Innovative Statistical Methods. Discussion Guide

Expanded Access. to Investigational Drugs & Biologics. for Treatment Use

Expanded Access and the Individual Patient IND

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. CDER Small Business and Industry Assistance. (CDER SBIA) and New Drug Review.

CDER 2016 Actions and 2017 Priorities. Richard Moscicki Deputy Center Director for Science Operations, CDER, FDA

FDA approval of emergency expanded access use may be requested by telephone, facsimile, or other means of electronic communications.

Drug Development Services

Agenda: Opportunities in Developing Orphan Drug Products. Mukesh Kumar, PhD, RAC

Expanded Access (including Emergency Use & Humanitarian Use Devices)

Breakthrough Devices Program Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Type of Activity. Universal Activity Number L04-P

September 12, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

Regulatory Pathways for Rare Diseases

DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access

FDA initiatives to facilitate evaluation of novel percutaneous valve technologies within the US

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

A Risk-based Approach for In Vitro Companion Diagnostics Device FDA Approval Process Associated with Therapies that have Breakthrough Designation

The Promise and Challenge of Adaptive Design in Oncology Trials

BIOPHARMA SOLUTIONS TM Expedite Your Drug Development Program

Section I: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices

Medical Device Development Tools. Draft Guidance for Industry, Tool Developers, and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Regulatory hurdles and opportunities

The Emerging Technology Program: FDA s Perspective

Orphan designation in the EU

Summary of Provisions in 21 st Century Cures Act (H.R. 6) as passed by full House of Representatives, July 10, 2015

Recommendation on elements required to support the medical plausibility and the assumption of significant benefit for an orphan designation

December 4, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

An ECOG Established Oncology

How to rescue a clinical trial

Industry Experience: Early Collaboration with FDA on Combination Products. Kristi Kistner, Amgen Inc. CMC Strategy Form January 26, 2015

CTA/NDA Regulatory Landscape in China. Jack Xie, PhD, DABT SOT 2016

Murray Sheldon, MD Associate Director for Technology and Innovation Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Office of the Center Director

CDER New Drug Review: 2014 Update

The Future of Generic Pharmaceuticals

Early Feasibility Study (EFS) IDEs

FDA Guidance, Clinical Pharmacology, and Regulatory Science

Is FMT A Drug? Lance Shea, M.S., J.D. Washington Square, Suite Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC, D

Evolving Regulatory Guidance on Submission of Standardized Data. James R. Johnson, PhD RTP CDISC User Network

Regulatory Considerations and Trends Europe and the U.S.

Optimization Strategies of Expression Cell Line Construction to Reduce the Biological Drug Development Risk. Feng Gao, MD, PhD. AutekBio CO.

Emerging Trends in Regulatory Outsourcing WHITE PAPER.

Supporting Innovation through Scientific Advice

Value of Industry Pharmacists (VIP) Case Competition ( ) Competition Guide Version 2.0. This year s competition is sponsored by:

uniqure Completes Strategic Review to Refocus its Pipeline, Reduce Operating Costs and Deliver Long-Term Shareholder Value

EU scientific regulatory support mechanisms and initiatives for innovation in drug development: the EMA perspective

Defining Clinical Benefit in Clinical Trials: FDA Perspective

Mark D. Kramer, RAC Regulatory Strategies, Inc.

PAREXEL GENOMIC MEDICINE SERVICES. Applying genomics to enhance your drug development journey

US FDA: CMC Issues for INDs

Volunteering for Clinical Trials

ectd: A Clinical Reviewer s Experience Sarah M. Connelly, MD Medical Officer Division of Antiviral Products FDA

Clinical Trials Development Resource for Hematologic Disorders (U24)

Early Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective

About Clinical Trials

MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND ISO 14155

EU Regulation Review: challenges and opportunities for industry

Introduction to Clinical Research

CRO partner in Rx/CDx Co-Development

FDA Drug Approval Process Vicki Seyfert-Margolis, Ph.D.

Introduction to CMC Regulatory Affairs

USA Proprietary Name Review Process

PharmaSUG 2017 Paper DS14

S9 Implementation Working Group ICH S9 Guideline: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals Questions and Answers

Adaptive Pathways. Goals of EMA and National Competent Authorities. Harald Enzmann

Outline CLINICALLY RELEVANT SPECIFICATIONS. ISPE Process Validation Conference September 2017 Bethesda, MD

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Determination of IND/IDE Requirement

Recommendations for Strengthening the Investigator Site Community

PAREXEL ACCESS MANAGED ACCESS PROGRAMS

Prosensa s continued development of exon-51 skipping with drisapersen after the failure of its phase-iii clinical trial.

Managing QbD From A CMO Perspective

The Intersection of Genomics Research and the IDE Regulation

Policy Position. Pharmacy-mediated interchangeability for Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs)

1.4 Applicable Regulatory Requirement(s) Any law(s) and regulation(s) addressing the conduct of clinical trials of investigational products.

Pharmacovigilance and the Generic Industry

Combination Products at US FDA

Developing a European First-in-Human Study: Three Key Decisions

Delivering on the promise: the clinical application of new diagnoses and treatments for RD K A T E B U S H B Y N E W C A S T L E U N I V E R S I T Y

Data Quality and Integrity: From Clinical Monitoring to Marketing Approval

INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTIONS AND EARLY FEASIBILITY STUDIES TO SUPPORT DEVICE INNOVATION

FDA Perspectives on Biomarkers. Steven Kozlowski, M.D. Office of Biotechnology Products OPS/CDER/FDA

Evolution of the CMC Review - ANDAs

Industry Academic Collaboration: A Key to Successful Involvement of Patients Early in Clinical Development

Rebiotix: Business, Regulatory and Clinical Challenges in Commercializing a Microbiota Based Drug. May 2016

Investigator-Initiated INDs

Topics. Safety First Initiative. Drug Safety Communications DRUG SAFETY INITIATIVES AT THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

KFDA Regulatory Framework on Biopharmaceuticals - Focus on Biosimilar

Transcription:

Regulatory Sciences Expediting drug approval Speed your time to market with FDA s expedited programs The faster way to marketing submission and drug approval for serious conditions and rare diseases In recent years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made great advances in the review of new drugs. The United States is now reported to lead the world in both timeliness and quantity of noteworthy new drug approvals. Case in point: 2015 saw the highest number of novel new drugs approved by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 45 approvals in all, with 21 (47 percent) of these approved products having orphan designation. This progress is due, in part, to FDA s ongoing commitment to improve the drug development process and establish robust development programs that are efficient and predictable. The result: products that have a positive benefit-risk profile are effective and available to patients. 1,3 Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions FDA approved a record number of novel drugs and new orphan drugs in 2015. This is especially important for patients who have serious and life-threatening diseases or illnesses for which there are few therapeutic options. For these patients, time is of the essence, and the traditional drug development process is far too lengthy. Standard drug development programs involve multiple complex steps, including formulating and manufacturing the drug product, characterizing the new drug, gathering adequate evidence on the product s performance, evaluating safety risks, and confirming the effects observed in early clinical trials. To minimize the time to get new drugs to market and help seriously ill patients faster, the development process must be compressed and evidence of the drug s effects must be gathered as efficiently as possible.

Fast track designation Breakthrough therapy designation Accelerated approval Priority review designation Meeting the challenge FDA established four expedited programs to speed the development and review of new drug and biological products that address unmet medical needs in the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition. These programs fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, accelerated approval, and priority review designation help ensure that therapies for serious conditions are approved and available to patients as soon as they have been proven to provide a clinically meaningful benefit. 2 The programs help solve a historical challenge. In the past, industry sponsors were responsible for preparing and presenting to FDA a solid, well-designed strategy and corresponding pathway for the development of their potential drug product, with little input from FDA. Via the breakthrough therapy designation, FDA now supplements, guides, and accelerates sponsor efforts with FDA staff who are experienced in the review process and regulatory health project management. How the expedited programs work Key concepts to determine a drug s program eligibility 2 3 Define and describe a serious condition Study existing available therapies Determine if product addresses an unmet medical need Over the past few years in the United States, there has been an increasing trend in the number of marketing application filings and novel new drug approvals. In the last two years, there has also been an impressive percentage of products approved that were in one or more expedited designation categories, including breakthrough therapy designation. From 2014 to 2015, FDA s CDER approved 86 novel new drugs, and more than half were in one or more expedited program categories. In addition, of the approved drugs using an expedited program, 92 percent were orphan designated drugs. These success stories demonstrate that FDA and industry partners are leveraging the expedited pathways to bring innovative products to market faster. They are reducing the time necessary for drug development without compromising the standards for safety and effectiveness. As a result, patients with serious conditions and rare diseases now have new potential treatment options. These new drugs are serving previously unmet medical needs and significantly aiding in the advancement of patient care and public health. 1,3 Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions cardinalhealth.com/regulatorysciences 2

A look inside the four FDA Expedited Programs 1. Fast track designation Facilitates the development and expedited review of drugs intended to treat a serious condition for an unmet medical need when there is no available therapy There is no adequate available therapy for a serious condition or the drug is designated as a qualified infectious disease product The potential to address an unmet medical need can be demonstrated by evidence of nonclinical activity, mechanistic rationale, theoretical rationale, pharmacologic data, or clinical data, depending on the stage of development Expedites development and review via frequent interactions with the agency review team and rolling review of the marketing application: Frequent agency interactions include pre-ind, end-of-phase 1, end-of-phase 2, pre-nda, or pre-bla meetings and consultation meetings to discuss clinical study designs, application-enabling data, marketing application structure and content, accelerated approval, and the potential eligibility for priority review of the marketing application. Rolling review is a review of portions of the marketing application before the entire application has been submitted, which is granted if FDA determines that the product may be effective based on a preliminary evaluation of the clinical data. 2 2. Breakthrough therapy designation Shortens the development and review time when early clinical evidence indicates that the new potential therapy shows a substantial improvement over all available therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints There is potential to address an unmet medical need for a serious condition when an available therapy exists There is existence of clinical evidence that the potential therapy demonstrates a substantial improvement over all available therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints Includes all the features of fast track designation, including frequent interactions with FDA and eligibility for rolling review Includes more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient drug development program (beginning as early as phase 1 clinical trials) and an Agency commitment involving FDA management 2 FDA has implemented a new procedure, the Preliminary BTDR Advice Request, which can be used to obtain FDA guidance prior to submitting a formal breakthrough therapy designation request. Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions cardinalhealth.com/regulatorysciences 3

3. Accelerated approval pathway Accelerates the approval for drugs for serious conditions that fill an unmet medical need based on a surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint The clinical data demonstrates a meaningful advantage over the available therapy to treat a serious condition The effect on a surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit when the disease course is long and an extended period is required to measure the drug s intended clinical benefit Allows for earlier approval of a new drug that demonstrates an effect on a surrogate or intermediate endpoint A commitment to conduct postmarketing studies to confirm the drug s clinical benefit 2 4. Priority review designation Shortens the marketing application s review time for a drug that treats a serious condition and demonstrates the potential to be a significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a disease There is evidence to demonstrate significant improvement in one of these areas: Increased effectiveness in treatment, prevention, or diagnosis of a condition Elimination or substantial reduction of a treatment-limiting drug reaction Documented enhancement of patient compliance, expected to lead to an improvement in serious outcomes Safety and effectiveness in a new subpopulation Allows for a 6-month FDA review clock for a marketing application compared to a 10-month review clock for a standard review of a marketing application 2 Accelerating rare disease treatment More than 25 million Americans suffer from one of 7,000 rare, orphan diseases (defined as a disease that affects less than 200,000 people in the United States). In 1983, the Orphan Drug Act was passed to stimulate the development of products for these patients. More than 3,500 drugs and biologics have been designated as orphan drugs, with more than 500 approved orphan designated products listed in FDA s database as of early 2016. Most of these orphan drugs are indicated to treat a serious or life-threatening condition. In 2014, 17 (41 percent) of 41 drugs approved were orphan-designated drugs, all of which utilized at least one expedited program. Seven (78 percent) of the nine drugs with breakthrough designations were also orphandesignated drugs. In 2015, the highest number of orphan drugs was approved since passage of the Orphan Drug Act in 1983, marking the best year for rare disease new molecular entity approvals. In 2015, 21 of the 45 approved drugs were orphan-designated drugs, which surpassed 2014 orphan drug approvals by 6 percent. Also, 18 of the 21 approved orphan drugs received one or more of the FDA expedited program pathways. 1,3 Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions cardinalhealth.com/regulatorysciences 4

Best practices for success Sponsors face a number of challenges during the marketing application process, such as aligning program components, compressed timelines, and FDA review. Often, the clinical development component is not the rate-limiting step for application submission. When developing a product with an expedited program, sponsors should be prepared to: Promote proactive communication with FDA to ensure the development components and submission timing meet expectations for licensure or marketing approval Pursue a more rapid manufacturing development program to accommodate the accelerated pace of the clinical program Engage its review and compliance staff to manage review and inspection timing Gain FDA agreement on the nonclinical program and marketing-applicationenabling studies Communicate early regarding the proposed labeling as well as postmarketing requirements and commitments Focus on the benefit-risk profile and link to the patient 1 Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions cardinalhealth.com/regulatorysciences 5

Whether you need assistance with a small part of the regulatory process or a partner to help ensure the approval and success of your product, we have the expertise to help guide your products to market and beyond. Learn more about Cardinal Health Regulatory Sciences at: cardinalhealth.com/regulatorysciences This white paper was written based on information in FDA s Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions: An Overview and Leveraging Expedited Programs for Drugs and Biologics for Serious Conditions and Rare Diseases, by Diane M. Beatty, PhD. Dr. Beatty is Managing Director, Regulatory Affairs and Product Development, for the Regulatory Sciences group of Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions and is a subject matter expert regarding FDA s expedited programs and orphan drug development. These articles first appeared in the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society s online publication Regulatory Focus in March 2015. 1 Beatty DM. Leveraging Expedited Programs Drugs and Biologics for Serious Conditions and Rare Diseases. Regulatory Focus. March 2015. Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society. 2 Beatty DM. FDA s Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions: An Overview. Regulatory Focus. March 2015. Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society. 3 Novel Drugs 2015. (2016, January). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DrugInnovation/UCM485053.pdf 2016 Cardinal Health. All Rights Reserved. CARDINAL HEALTH, the Cardinal Health LOGO and ESSENTIAL TO CARE are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cardinal Health. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Lit. No. 1SR16-48414 (04/2016) cardinalhealth.com/regulatorysciences Cardinal Health Regulatory Sciences 7400 W 110th Street, Suite 300 Overland Park, KS 66210