Body Condition Scoring of Beef Cattle for Youth Producers What It Is and How to Use It

Similar documents
Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows:

Guide to Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows and Bulls

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Effects of Body Condition and Energy Intake on Reproduction of Beef Cows

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

FUNDAMENTALS. Feeder Calf Grading. Jason Duggin and Lawton Stewart, Beef Extension Specialists.

Pasture Passages. Sydney Hayter. From The Agent s Desk. Issue 2 Jacksonville, FL January/February 2015

Feeder Calf Grading Fundamentals

How we feed our beef

Illinois 4-H Livestock Record

Carcass Video Images in Genetic Evaluation and Breeding Program in Ireland

Details. Note: This lesson plan addresses cow/calf operations. See following lesson plans for stockers and dairy operations.

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Heifer Management to Make Successful Cows

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

hitting the target McDowell County Center August 2012 The McDowell

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Effects of Training and Experience on Repeatable and Reliable Assessment of Beef Cattle Body Condition Scores

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm

Missouri Correlations CEV Pathway: Animal Systems Pathway

Cull Cow Meat Quality

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Beef Cattle Handbook

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

A Comparison of Milk Production In

MONITORING HEIFER PROGRAMS

Increasing Value Captured From the Land Natural Resources

Guidelines For Uniform Beef Improvement Programs

Management Calendar for North Carolina Producers

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Telephone: (706) Animal and Dairy Science Department Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Welcome to Igenity Brangus and the Power of Confident Selection

Skills, Competencies and Knowledge

Influence of Cow BCS and Late Gestation Supplementation: Effects on Cow and Calf Performance 1

2

Beef Improvement New Zealand Inc.

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

Market specifications for beef cattle

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Effect of Selected Characteristics on the Sale Price of Feeder Cattle in Eastern Oklahoma: 1997 & 1999 Summary

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

An Economic Comparison of Conventional vs. Intensive Heifer Rearing

Objectives. Economic Comparison of Conventional vs. Intensive Heifer Rearing Systems. Problems with the Historical Approach to Rearing Calves

Leaving Certificate Higher Level Beef Production Questions

Production Records for Cow/Calf Producers Sandy Johnson, Beef specialist Bob Weaber, Cow/calf specialist

Agricultural Science Project

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

NAME: STATE: Intermediate Cattlemen s Quiz: Version A. For Questions 1-7 use the following scenario

CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING

STAAR 4, 7 - Writing - 1, 2, 3 Livestock and Their Products

FARMFEED LIMITED. Adding value to Zambian crops through livestock SOME OF THE BASICS FOR DAIRY FARMING IN ZAMBIA

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Heterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers

Bull Management and Nutrition

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Guidelines n 3 : LIVESTOCK FARMING

Animal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

ANIMAL DOMESTICATION

IRISH CATTLE BREEDING FEDERATION

Genetic Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle Report from EU Concerted Action GIFT

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

U.S. ROUNDTABLE FOR SUSTAINABLE BEEF INDICATOR AND METRIC SUMMARY

Wagyu 101. Michael Scott Certified Executive Chef Academy of Chefs Corporate Chef for Rosewood Ranches Texas Raised Wagyu Beef

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

Fall Calf Care Audit Form

BSc (Veterinary Biosciences) Level 1. Animal Production and Management - 1 ( ) Credits

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Setting Weight-for-Age Targets

COW/CALF CORNER The Newsletter

National standards for nutrient contents in manure

National Drought Management Authority (NYERI) COUNTY DROUGHT EARLY WARNING BULLETIN FOR SEPTEMBER 2017

Round Table Discussion. Does the Seedstock Industry Focus on the Needs of the Commercial Cow/Calf Producer?

Nichols Farms. Angus 8/12. Private Treaty Bull Sale 64 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

TAKE HOME MESSAGES Illinois Parameter < 18,000 18,000 22,000 > 22,000

Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency

How growth affects carcase and meat quality attributes

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

Environmental factors such as matching cows to their environment, heat stress and immunity to disease affect herd fertility.

Balancing Forage Demand with Forage Supply

HEALTHY COWS START WITH HEALTHY GRASS. CHAPARRAL SPECIALTY HERBICIDE FOR FESCUE SEED HEAD SUPPRESSION.

Part 1 Johne s Disease Overview A concise summary of the latest facts about Johne s disease and recommended methods for diagnosis and control.

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI December 1, 2 and , Casper, WY

Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle

Which dog do you want to be?

Transcription:

Body Condition Scoring of Beef Cattle for Youth Producers What It Is and How to Use It Contributing Authors: Sherry Nickles and Vicki Reed Extension Educators, Ohio State University Extension Reviewers: Stephen Boyles, Ph.D., Paul S. Kuber, Ph.D., Lucinda B. Miller, Ph.D. The Ohio State University Body Condition Scoring (BCS) is a tool beef producers can use to visually evaluate the effectiveness of the nutritional and animal health management programs of their cattle. Decisions can be made on how to adjust feeding and health management practices as a result of visual body condition scores. The U.S. Beef BCS assigns a score based on animals that are thin (BCS = 1) or fat (BCS = 9). Other species have similar evaluation tools with acceptable BCS based on stages of production. Horses, like beef cattle are scored on a 9-point scale. Dairy cattle, sheep, swine, and goats (dairy and meat) are scored on a 5-point scale. An ideal body condition score for beef cattle ranges from 5 to 7 across many stages of production. How can this information help a beef producer? By evaluating the condition of their beef cattle a producer can improve on the management (health, nutrition, welfare, etc.) of their animals. To be more specific, the condition of the cow herd can affect: conception rates time between birth and when the cow will rebreed calf survival and vigor milk production which affects weaning weights When raising market beef, a BCS can assist in determining the best condition for the animal as harvest approaches. Changes may be needed in the current ration and the amount of feed being fed. Two animals with the same body condition score can vary greatly in weight. Likewise, two animals weighing the same can vary in body condition score. Also, the BCS changes depending upon factors such as breed, fill (how much feed they ve consumed prior to scoring) or stage of the production cycle. Table 1. The amount of weight change required for an animal to increase by one BCS.

Table 1. Weight changes needed to increase one beef cattle body condition score. Body Condition Score (BCS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Animal Weight, pounds 770 924 1,078 810 972 1,134 870 1,044 1,218 930 1,116 1,302 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,080 1,296 1,512 1,180 1,416 1,652 1,300 1,560 1,820 1,440 9 1,728 2,016 Source: NRC, 2000. Adapted from NRC Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7 th revised edition. Weight Change Needed to Increase 1 BCS, pounds 40 48 56 60 72 60 72 70 98 80 96 112 100 120 140.120 144 168 140 168 196 HOW TO BODY CONDITION SCORE Body scoring is a subjective assessment tool that can be done visually or by palpating the animal. You will become more accurate in scoring as you gain experience. It is important to have proper guidance when learning, and takes practice to become consistent. Choose one or both methods and be consistent each time you score. You are evaluating the animal for amount of muscle, skeletal features, and fat cover (deposition) in several places on the animal s body. Begin at the front of the animal with the brisket and shoulder, then move to the ribs and back, and finally to the hooks, pins and tail head. View the animal from the front, side and rear. If you choose to palpate, use just the areas where fat is the only tissue between the skin and bone (ribs, back, hip, and pin bones).

The following factors may cause you to incorrectly body score an animal: if it (1) has just eaten, (2) is pregnant, or (3) has a lot of hair or wool. At these times it is best to use manual palpation to get a better picture of the animal s body condition. WHEN TO BODY CONDITION SCORE The most critical body condition scoring should be done during pre-breeding, mid-gestation, post-parturition and weaning. Females that are too thin or are overly conditioned at these critical points may have trouble conceiving, sustaining a growing fetus, calving, and/or milking. However, females nursing a calf may normally experience a loss of body condition. Youth producers should strive to maintain cattle within the 5-7 BCS range. Only healthy animals in this BCS range should be brought for exhibition. Practice in proper scoring will help you monitor your animal s health and nutritional status, and allow you to make needed changes to your feeding and management programs. Questions about your animal s wellness program can be directed to your fair veterinarian and your feed company representative.

SCORE BRISKET, BACK RIBS, HOOKS, PINS, TAIL HEAD 1 No detectable fat These areas project prominently Emaciated 2 No detectable fat Tail head and ribs prominent Poor condition 3 Thin condition All ribs visible Very little detectable fat 4 Borderline condition Outline of 3-5 ribs visible Spine slightly visible Some fat over ribs and hips/hooks 5 Moderate condition Outline of 1-2 ribs visible No outline of spine Fat over hips but still visible Good overall appearance 6 High moderate condition Ribs no longer visible Some fat in brisket and flank Must use hand pressure to feel bone 7 Good, fleshy appearance Hips slightly visible, ribs not visible Fat in brisket and flank Slight udder and tail head fat 8 Fat, fleshy and over-conditioned Bone structure not visible Large fat deposit in brisket Large patchy fat deposits over ribs and around tail head 9 Extremely fat, wasty and patchy Extreme fat deposits over ribs and around tail head Bone structure not visible Mobility possibly impaired Extreme fat deposit in brisket

References: Mangione, D. L-292. Scoring Cows Can Improve Profits. Ohio State University Extension. Parish, J.A., J.D. Rinehart. 2008. Body Condition Scoring Beef Cattle. 2508. Mississippi State University Extension Service. Parker, G., Coffey, R., Body Condition Scoring in Farm Animals. University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences.