Probation Management Program: A special condition of probation ordered by a juvenile court judge that includes graduated sanctions.

Similar documents
Crime: Convictions that are considered mandatory disqualification or dismissal from employment, including:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: {x} All DJJ Staff { } Administration { } Community Services { } Secure Facilities I.

FY 2017 Strategic Plan Update. Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. Nathan Deal Governor. Avery D. Niles Commissioner

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: {x} All DJJ Staff {x} Administration {x} Community Services {x} Secure Facilities I.

LEHIGH COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE

Accumulated Paid Leave: Includes FLSA compensatory time, sick leave, deferred holiday time, annual leave and state compensatory time.

TOLEDO MUNICIPAL COURT-Probation Department CLASS SPECIFICATION Probation Officer

Transmittal # Related Standards & References: O.C.G.A et seq., State Personnel Board Rule Policy # 3.

Employment Application Human Resources Department

Justice Reinvestment Initiative at the Local Level

APPROVED: Those who regularly come in contact with youth;

Griffin-Spalding County Board of Education Application for Superintendent

CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER

County of Santa Clara Probation Department Administrative Services

Strategic Plan

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTION (ACC)

Using Data to Guide Deep End Juvenile Justice Reform

A step by step process for the implementation of the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) in Pennsylvania

Administrative Office of the Courts

Probation Transformation: Developing an Intervention that. Advances Racial Equity

Session Two: Data Collection and Analysis for Budget Advocacy

A step by step process for the implementation of the Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP) in Pennsylvania

Probation Population: 05-07

IX. MEP MANAGERIAL EXEMPT PERSONNEL SCHOOL SITE NON-SCHOOL SITE IX-1

&sharedwin...

User Guide for the Chief Probation Officers of California Data Dashboard: Juvenile Probation

Policies and Procedures for PREQUALIFICATION of JOINT VENTURES

Positive Youth Justice Initiative Year 2 Evaluation Findings: Alameda County

CHAPTER 48 EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. (1) It is the County's policy to treat all employees fairly and equitably.

LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Social Services Temporary & Disability Assistance

Request For Information (RFI) Addendum #1

FACILITATING OFFENDER SUPERVISION AND RE- ENTRY THROUGH COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: THE ROLE OF VPOs IN KENYA

1. DJJ will not grant an employee the use of sick leave before such leave is earned, as provided for in this policy.

Disciplinary Policy and Procedures for SPA Employees

Implementing Effective Correctional Management of Offenders in the Community Outcome and Process Measures

Multco PLACEMENT COORDINATOR Job Description

2. Policy. Employee management and disciplinary action practices at the University are subject to the following policies:

Villanova University Background Screening Policy

Restorative Justice Re-design

Hays County Job Description. Prepared by: Human Resource Grade: 110 Date Prepared: February 2014 FLSA: Non-Exempt Caseworker

CHAPTER 6 DISCIPLINE AND DISMISSAL

Monitoring Study of Misdemeanor Probation Services in Palm Beach County October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011

BACK TO BASICS: Employee Discipline and Dismissal

Functional Area #2 Employment & Employee Relations P1

Global Forum on Competition

Disciplinary Policy & Procedure

Progressive Discipline Policy

SFCC EMPLOYEE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION POLICY 4-2

Volume 47 Number 24 Saturday, June 17, 2017 Harrisburg, PA Pages

~New Jersey Courts., Independence Integrity Fairness Quality Service Statewide

Stanislaus County Girls Juvenile Justice Initiative Evaluation Report. Caroline Glesmann and Angela Irvine

POSITION APPLIED FOR DATE / / NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER - - HOME ADDRESS Street. City, State, Zip HOME PHONE ( ) CELL PHONE ( )

NUMBER STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PRISON/PRE-RELEASE/ DOC WORK RELEASE/FIELD SIGNATURE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. ADVISORY TASK FORCE ON THE WOMAN AND JUVENILE FEMALE OFFENDER IN CORRECTIONS and GIRLS COLLABORATIVE

State Highway Patrol Leadership Advisory Group. Final Recommendations

Uvita Christian Academy Uvita, Costa Rica. Employment Application

F9 Working with the Juvenile Justice System and Probation Youth in Wraparound

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OF ORANGE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY and ANTI-HARASSMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE (Board Resolution )

Performance Management Framework

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. IA No in IA No. 22 in Writ Petition (C) No of Decided On:

Administrative Responses in Probation and Parole Supervision: A Research Memo American Probation and Parole Association

Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol (SPEP ) in Pennsylvania: Performance Improvement Guide for Juvenile Justice Stakeholders

Ethics Is Everybody s Business

Corporate Compliance & the Antitrust Division

ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS (AOD) EDUCATION AND MOTIVATIONAL PROGRAMMES: SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS

JOB RECRUITMENT: COURTROOM CLERK APPLICATION DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 3, 3 PM

Data Planning in the Dual Status Youth Initiatives: Initial Suggestions

Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 to 2001

UNIT 14 - FRESNO SHERIFF S SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE PURPOSE

ETHICS MANUAL. GIS Certification Institute. Version 2.1. November 1, 2010

PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS

Conflict Resolution and Complaints of Unlawful Discrimination and Harassment Penn State Hershey Medical Center Human Resources Manual

Over the last ten years, Congress has appropriated hundreds

UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

The Office of Financial Regulation Statement of Agency Organization and Operation

KCTCS Human Resources Procedures #3 Progressive Disciplinary Action Procedures

EMPLOYEE CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK

SUPERVISOR S GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN FISCAL YEAR

Duties and Responsibilities Of the Patrol Officer

Employee termination decisions are not subject to the informal resolution process.

Employee termination decisions and contract non-renewal decisions are not subject to the informal resolution process.

Reintegration Framework Systems Planning Toolkit

Court Administration Staffing Models

New Castle County Ethics Commission GOVERNMENT ETHICS NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Disciplinary Actions, Suspension and Dismissal

Supersedes: No. 119 dated 2/1/05 Approved by: Joshua A. Smith, City Manager

Ethics for NC Local Elected Officials. Ethics In Government NCLM Annual Conference. Whose interests do you serve?

Minnesota Department of Corrections

Rookery School Disciplinary Procedure Relating to Misconduct for All Employees

Community Development Districts Workshop

PERU, NOVEMBER 2005 THEME I. Controls on property and income of public officials. Procedure for

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TO WYOMING WATER ADMINISTRATION

Department of Justice

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Individual national consultant Review and Update the Probation Officers manual

AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION REFERENCE

ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT SPECIALIST CLASSIFICATION SERIES

ANNUAL AUDIT PLAN FISCAL YEAR

Transcription:

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration {x} Community Services { } Secure Facilities Transmittal # 17-17 Related Standards & References: O.C.G.A. 15-11-601, 15-11-605 DJJ 20.26, 20.30, 20.32 Policy # 20.33 Chapter 20: CASE MANAGEMENT Effective Date: 12/28/17 Scheduled Review Date: 12/28/18 Subject: GRADUATED SANCTIONS Replaces: 7/1/12 Community Services Attachments: APPROVED: A Secure Probation Sanctions Affidavit B Supervision Violations C High Level of Service Grid D Medium Level of Service Grid E Low Level of Service Grid Avery D. Niles, Commissioner I. POLICY: The Department of Juvenile Justice shall use a systematic and measurable approach to the discipline of committed and probated youth being supervised in the community. A continuum of reinforcements and sanctions shall be used at each level to provide consequences for violations and to motivate youth to change their behavior. Sanctions shall be based upon the youth s level of supervision and the seriousness of the violation. II. DEFINITIONS: Graduated Sanctions: A structured, decision-making process with a continuum of services and consequences for youth who are placed in the community and who violate the terms of their probation or commitment. The Juvenile Needs Assessment (JNA): A tool that will evaluate the presenting strengths and needs of each youth and systematically identify critical areas of needs or problems in order to plan effective interventions. Pre-Dispositional Risk Assessment (PDRA): A tool that will help identify which system-involved youth are most likely to be involved in future offending. Probation Management Program: A special condition of probation ordered by a juvenile court judge that includes graduated sanctions. Secure Probation Sanctions Affidavit: An affidavit requesting Secure Probation Sanctions completed by the probation officer supervising a youth following the youth having at least 3 violations that specifies:

CASE MANAGEMENT GRADUATED SANCTIONS 20.33 2 of 6 The elements of the youth s probation program; The youth s failures to respond to graduated sanctions in the community; and The youth s number of violations and the nature of each violation. Secure Probation Sanction: Secure confinement of 7, 14, or 30 day following a hearing with a juvenile court judge or a hearing officer as provided as a component of the Probation Management Program. Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing: An administrative proceeding in compliance with O.C.G.A. 15-11-605 in which an appointed Hearing Officer determines if a youth sentenced to probation with a special condition placing the youth in the Probation Management Program has violated the terms of his/her probation on 3 or more occasions and has failed to remediate his/her behavior in response to graduated sanctions. Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing Officer: A DJJ employee or a county juvenile probation office employee who has been selected, trained and appointed by the Department or county juvenile probation office, to hear cases alleging violations of probation for administrative sanctioning and send youth to the Secure Probation Sanctions Program. Violation: Non-compliance with a condition of probation/placement or a specified misdemeanor offense. III. PROCEDURES: A. The graduated sanctions program will be a component of the Department s supervision model and will be used to address the public safety, accountability and the need for secure probation sanctions with youth who have violated the terms of supervision. B. The graduated sanctions program utilizes a standard list of minor, moderate, and serious supervision violations. (See Attachment A.) C. The Pre-Disposition Risk Assessment (PDRA) will be used to determine the youth s risk and supervision level in accordance with DJJ 20.14, PDRA/SDM. D. Upon knowledge of a violation, the CCM will determine the sanction based upon the seriousness of the violation and the youth s level of supervision. 1. The High Level of Service Grid (Attachment B) will be used to determine the sanction for a youth with a high level of service. 2. The Medium Level of Service Grid (Attachment C) will be used to determine the sanction for a youth with a medium level of supervision.

CASE MANAGEMENT GRADUATED SANCTIONS 20.33 3 of 6 3. The Low Level of Service Grid (Attachment D) will be used to determine the sanction for a youth with a low level of supervision. E. One sanction will be issued for each violation. When multiple violations occur or the CCM becomes aware of multiple violations at one time, the most serious violation will be used to determine the sanction and only one violation will be included in the violation count. 1. For continued violations, the youth will be progressively sanctioned according to the grid that corresponds to his/her level of supervision. F. If a youth is accused of a delinquent act and the respective District Attorney does not file a petition, the CCM may use graduated sanctions. G. If a petition is filed and a youth is adjudicated for a delinquent act, graduated sanctions will not be used. H. General Guidelines for Probated Youth: 1. Violations of probation may identify new needs of the offender. In these cases, staff will review and update the JNA and Service Plan (see DJJ 20.31, Needs Assessment and Service Planning) to address any needs, as well as address any violations through graduated sanctions. 2. If a probated youth has been given a special condition for the Probation Management Program and has violated their terms of probation at least 3 times, the CCM may, in consultation with the Juvenile Program Manager (JPM), complete a Secure Probation Sanctions Affidavit (Attachment E) that documents the youth s violations and sanctions and will request a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing either with the juvenile court judge or with a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing Officer. 3. For a youth that does not have a special condition for the Probation Management Program and has a subsequent violation, a formal violation of probation and appearance in front of the Court will be sought after all allowed sanctions have been used. 4. Violations: a. Low risk youth must receive at least 3 violations and the concurrence of the JPM before being eligible for Secure Probation Sanctions. i. When the youth has had 4 violations, the CCM may consult with the JPM to determine if the youth will continue to receive graduated

CASE MANAGEMENT GRADUATED SANCTIONS 20.33 4 of 6 sanctions or will be referred for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing. ii. iii. When the youth has had 6 violations, the youth will be referred for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing. When the determination is made to refer the youth for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing, the CCM will complete the Secure Probation Sanctions Affidavit. b. Medium risk youth must receive at least 3 violations and the concurrence of the JPM before being eligible for Secure Probation Sanctions. i. When the youth has 4 violations, the CCM may consult with the JPM to determine if the youth will continue to receive graduated sanctions or will be referred for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing. ii. iii. When a youth has 5 violations, the youth will be referred for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing. When the determination is made to refer the youth for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing, the CCM will complete the Secure Probation Sanctions Affidavit. c. High-risk youth must receive at least 3 violations and the concurrence of the JPM before being eligible for Secure Probation Sanctions. d. When the youth has 4 violations, the youth will be referred for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing. e. When the determination is made to refer the youth for a Secure Probation Sanctions Hearing, the CCM will complete the Secure Probation Sanctions Affidavit. 5. Local Procedures: a. Each District Director, in consultation with the judges of the judicial circuit, will develop local options within available local resources to complement the approved graduated sanction grids. b. In consultation with the local Juvenile Court Judge, each community services office will develop local procedures for the use of graduated sanctions and rewards/incentives. The local procedures will include, but not be limited to:

CASE MANAGEMENT GRADUATED SANCTIONS 20.33 5 of 6 i. Standards guiding the return of youth to court; ii. iii. Recognition of graduated sanctions imposed during the youth s probation; and A systematic, progressive and measurable rewards and incentives system. c. The District Director will approve the local procedures and forward copies of the approved local procedures to the Regional Administrator. I. General Guidelines for Committed Youth: 1. Violations of community supervision by a committed youth may identify new needs of the offender. In these cases, staff will address any violations through graduated sanctions. The JNA and Service Plan (see DJJ 20.31, Needs Assessment and Service Planning) should be reviewed and updated every 90 days to identify and address any additional needs. 2. Once the sanction process with a continuum of services and consequences has been administered and the case staffed with the JPM an administrative revocation Violation Report may be filed in accordance with DJJ 20.26, Administrative Revocation. J. Documentation: a. Each reward or incentive given will be documented in the Juvenile Tracking System (JTS) case notes within 72 hours. b. Each sanction given will be documented on the youth s sanction grid in JTS and in the JTS case notes within 72 hours. The youth and parent/guardian will be given immediate notification of the sanction, duration of the sanction, and the expected date the sanction will be completed. K. The JPM will monitor the graduated sanctions program for implementation and appropriateness of sanctions and rewards/incentives. Serious and/or chronic failure to implement appropriately a graduated sanctions program must be immediately addressed and reported through the chain of command. Detention, Secure Probation Sanctions or revocation of placement will not be used without the JPM thoroughly reviewing sanctioning efforts.

CASE MANAGEMENT GRADUATED SANCTIONS 20.33 6 of 6 IV. LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES REQUIRED: YES Refer to section III (H) (5). LOP will address the use of graduated sanctions and rewards/incentives. The local procedures will include, but not be limited to: o Standards guiding the return of youth to court; o Recognition of graduated sanctions imposed during the youth s probation; and o A systematic, progressive and measurable rewards and incentives system. o The District Director will approve the local procedures and forward copies of the approved local procedures to the Regional Administrator.