Economic and grazing resources analysis of extensive livestock farming systems (dehesas) in Spain

Similar documents
Sustainability of organic and conventional beef cattle farms in SW Spanish rangelands ('Dehesas'): a comparative study

National standards for nutrient contents in manure

Determining the costs and revenues for dairy cattle

Introduction BEEF 140

Skills, Competencies and Knowledge

Sustainable Pasture Management Practices in Tajikistan

Natural fertiliser control and application system in Poland state of the art. The natural manure composition in Poland estimating and verification

European beef farming systems classification

Extensive livestock farming in Morocco: from marginal territories to major social and environmental roles

Commentary on Results

Business mailing address (include civic number and road name) City/Town Province Postal code

dairy cattle, Breed Tell their principal uses and merits. Tell where the breeds originated.

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Agricultural Science Project

Agronomy Facts 54 Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38): Who Is Affected?

ANIMAL DOMESTICATION

3rd Cattle Network EAAP Workshop

Environmental Hazard in South Dakota?

Nutrient Budgeting. An Overview of What, How and Why. June 2014

ANIMAL SCIENCE Merit Badge Requirements

Animal Welfare at Waitrose

3. STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS BROKEN DOWN BY TYPES OF FARMING

Details. Note: This lesson plan addresses cow/calf operations. See following lesson plans for stockers and dairy operations.

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

Forage-SAFE: a tool to assess the management and economics of wood pasture systems

Profitability of Tasmanian beef enterprises:

The Farming World. LIVESTOCK GENERAL The main elements of the national herd are: - Cattle 10m Sheep 32m Pigs 4.7m Poultry 159m

Leaving Certificate Higher Level Beef Production Questions

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38):

THE FARM BUSINESS SURVEY IN WALES

Teagasc National Farm Survey 2016 Results

MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION (MDS 1) GUIDE FOR NEW NON-AGRICULTURAL USES ADJACENT TO EXISTING LIVESTOCK

Standard Animal Weights

Research on diversification in the Norwegian smalll ruminant sector. LARS OLAV EIK University of Life Sciences (UMB-Norway)

Telephone: (706) Animal and Dairy Science Department Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

APPENDIX A CALIFORNIA S LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES

Production of ohne Gentechnik Food Facility Description Agriculture animal products

Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Irish Agriculture:

MEAT INDUSTRY KEY INFO IN POINTS

Biodiversity component. Ibex survey Potential competition between ibex and livestock Livestock depredation survey

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Access to Pasture Guidance for Organic Ruminant Operations

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

TEXAS A8cM UNIVERSITY TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE

Beef Cattle Handbook

Summary. Scope. 1 Summary 27

French beef industry chain at the turning point. Philippe Chotteau Head Economics Dpt Institut de l Elevage

Agri Trends 13 July 2017

Checklist. KRAV s Extra Requirements for Dairy Products. For verifying KRAV s extra requirements in the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2018).

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Intensive Livestock Farming: Does Farm Size Matter?

Guidelines n 3 : LIVESTOCK FARMING

Puerto Rico - Various

RESEARCH REPORT YEARLY FUND, 2010 OPTIMALIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES AT DRY LAND AGRO-ECOSYSTEM

Why are extensive grazing systems disappearing? Understanding socio economic drivers Findings from Pays d Auge (France)

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

MINNESOTA HISTORIC FARMS STUDY Snapshot of Farming Regions SNAPSHOT OF FARMING REGIONS IN 1940

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

RETUR COSTS A 8 R R. and 96 LI6R R

International Valuation Guidance Note No. 10 Valuation of Agricultural Properties

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY AMONG SMALLHOLDER DAIRY FARMERS IN WESTERN KENYA. J. I. Mose, H. Nyongesa, Nyangweso P. Amusala G.

How are global and Australian sheepmeat producers performing?

Growing cattle fast on pasture

Animal Protein Production Impacts and Trends Dr. Judith L. Capper

Australian beef. Financial performance of beef cattle producing farms, to Peter Martin. Research report 15.5.

THE PROFITABILITY OF SEASONAL MOUNTAIN DAIRY FARMING IN NORWAY

How we feed our beef

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

Product Group Food, Final Conference, Friedrichshafen 14th February 2008 Report from project partner Autonomous Region of Aosta Valley County Council

Manure and Nutrient Management Report Huxley Farm

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

PROBLEMS OF WORLD AGRICULTURE

A. Bernués, J.L. Riedel, M.A. Asensio, M. Blanco, A. Sanz, R. Revilla, I. I. Casasús

Technical and economic monitoring in semi-intensive dairy sheep farms in the COVAP cooperative (Spain)

Institute of Organic Training & Advice

COOL Compliance for Beef Operations Ron Lemenager, Matt Claeys, and Allen Bridges Purdue University, Department of Animal Sciences

Modelling Livestock Component in FSSIM

Illinois 4-H Livestock Record

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

Silvopasture Economics: Three Case Studies. Larry Godsey Ph.D. Center Economist

Session 13_Manninen.pdf.

Balancing Forage Demand with Forage Supply

SUMMARY STATISTICS. Crocus Expo IEC, Moscow

Organic lamb and beef - what does it cost to produce?

Longitudinal studies refer to those that gather information from the same set of respondents through repeated visits over a defined period of time.

Compatibility of Agricultural Management Practices and Types of Farming in the EU to enhance Climate Change Mitigation and Soil Health

Walloon agriculture in figures

Key messages of chapter 3

Inventory of data on manure management

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

Variability of the global warming potential and energy demand of Swiss cheese

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

Livestock production in developing countries: globally significant and locally relevant John McDermott Deputy Director General

Transcription:

UNIVERSIDAD DE EXTREMADURA Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias Economic and grazing resources analysis of extensive livestock farming systems (dehesas) in Spain Gaspar, P., Escribano, M., Mesías, F.J., Pulido, A.F.,, Escribano, A.J.

Structure of the presentation Introduction The dehesa ecosystem Extremadura Region Livestock systems Materials and methods Study area Sample selection Calculation and evaluation of grazing resources Results Energy requirements of livestock Economic valuation

The dehesa system Typical agro-forestry system of the Iberian Peninsula Pasture is combined with Quercus spp trees Soil acid, shallow sandy loams of low fertility The climate: continental Mediterranean -Temperature: 16-17 C -Rainfall: 300 and 800 mm Livestock species Other Uses: cork and hunting Area: Spain reaches a total of approximately 5.8 million hectares 0.5 million hectares are located in southern Portugal Other provinces with dehesa Extremadura

Extremadura Region Surface: 41,634 km² (8,2%) Population 1,095,894 (2,6%) Density 26.03 inhab./km²

Livestock systems High operation size Meat production oriented Extensive LFS The products are high quality, but seasonal Deficient in commercialization Contribute to environmental protection No other alternatives other than livestock production exist in the area The importance of these livestock farming systems 1. Contribution to the regional economy 2. Guarantee the maintenance of this complex and particularly sensitive ecosystem.

Livestock systems: Cattle herds Authoctonous breeds suckling cows: Retinta Morucha Avileña-Negra Ibérica Lidia Breeding: Dec-July Suplementation period: Sept-March Product sold: weaned calf 180 days-200kg

Livestock systems: Cattle herds

Livestock systems: Sheep herds Breeds: Merino Entrefina Breeding: 1 lambing per year 2 lambing/3 years No lambing during summer Some of them are dairy sheep herds: low milk yield Lamb sold after fattening: 22-28 kg 80 days old

Breeds Verata Serrana Livestock systems: Goat herds Breeding: Spring Milk yield 235 l/goat 230 days Weaned kids: 9kg

Livestock systems: Pig herds Breeds: Iberian Breeding phase: Outdoors or indoors 2 farrowing Dec June Sows and boars: fed with cereals

Livestock systems: Pig herds Fattening period: 1st Stage cria : Birth-23kg 2nd stage recria : 23kg-100kg 3rd stage (Fattening) 100-160kg Montanera : Animals fattened with accorn for 2.5-3 months and Slaughtered with 16-20 months old Recebo : accorns+cereals Cebo : cereals

Pig products: Iberian dry-cured ham The curing process takes from 12 months to 36 months

Purpose of this grazing valuation Which amount of environmental resources cover the food needs of livestock in extensive farming systems such as dehesas? Current situation: significant increases in the cost of feedstuffs. Main utility of answering this question to adapt Livestock densities to available grazing resources in the farms in other to reduce supplementary feed costs and overstocking risks

The main question is. How much of livestock requirements are covered by grazing??? Livestock requirements of all the animals in the farms (cattle, sheep, pigs..) Which percentage of these Requirements are covered by grazing Livestock density How much cost these grazing resources? Field work

Materials and Methods

Study area Region of Extremadura 2.2 million ha More than 50% of the utilized agricultural area is considered to be dehesa.

Sample selection The data used were obtained from survey questionnaires conducted in 2004 and 2005 with dehesa farm owners or managers in the Region of Extremadura (SW Spain). The surveys were conducted on site 69 holders of dehesa farms larger than 100 ha. Questionnaires Farm land uses Number and types of animals Feedstuffs

Calculation and evaluation of grazing resources The total requirements of species i (NTGi) are determined by the total number of animals of class j (Nj, animals of the same age, and sex), the correction factor for the breed (Fcr), and the animals' annual energy requirements according to their class (UG): NTGi = j Nj x Fcr x UG Thus, a farm's total requirements (NT) will be given by the requirements of its cattle (UGv), plus its sheep (UGov), plus its pigs (UGp), etc.: NT = i NTGi NT = i UGv + UGov + UGp...

Calculation and evaluation of grazing resources The requirements covered by grazing (NTp) are obtained as the difference between the total requirements of the livestock (NT) and the feedstuffs supplied (NTs). The grazing resources are: NTp = NT - NTs (coefficients and values assigned to the principal raw materials used in animal feed in Martín et al. 1986).

Economic valuation The valuation of the resources was established according to the local market values of rent of pasture,forestry crops, and acorn for forage feeding, and taking into account the specific characteristics of each farm. Indicators calculated: Cost of grazing feed units ( /FU Forage units) Cost of feedstuff unit ( /FU) Cost of grazing /ha Cost of feedstuff /ha % Cost grazing resources/ cost total feed

Results

Farm Types The analysis of the farms are presented according 4 different types taking in account their technical and economics characteristics (full description of the typology construction process is developed in Gaspar et al. 2007). DEHESA FARM: Overall sample TYPE 1: Large sheep farms TYPE 2: Medium-sized beef cattle production TYPE 3: Small-scale sheep farms TYPE 4: Mixed beef cattle, sheep, and Iberian pig farms

Energy requirements of livestock and grazing resource use Livestock energy requirements (FU/ha) in dehesa farms Dehesa farm 992 Mixed beef, sheep, pig Small sheep 1432 1450 Medium beef cattle Large sheep farms 746 938 0 500 1000 1500

% Requirements covered by grazing acaccordding to farm type Dehesa farm 71,18 Mixed beef, sheep, pig Small sheep 59,18 60,01 Medium beef cattle Large sheep farms 0 20 40 60 80 74,07 76,04 Livestock density (LU/ha) Dehesa farm 0,61 Mixed beef, sheep, pig 0,88 Small sheep 0,89 Medium beef cattle 0,58 Large sheep farms 0,46 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1

Energy requirements of livestock and grazing resource use % Requirements covered by grazing according to livestock type Mast-feeding pigs 100 Sows 48,7 Sheep 76,87 Cattle 82,09 0 20 40 60 80 100

Economic value of grazing resources and feedstuffs Feeding costs in dehesa farms /FU Cost of feedstuff unit ( /FU) Cost of grazing feed unit ( /FU) Dehesa farm 0,17 0,43 Mixed beef, sheep, pig 0,18 0,51 Small sheep Medium beef cattle 0,13 0,16 0,37 0,35 Large sheep farms 0,19 0,50

Economic value of grazing resources and feedstuffs Cost of grazing feed units in dehesa farms ( /FU) Mast-feeding pigs 0,46 Sows 0,16 Sheep 0,17 Cattle 0,16

Economic value of grazing resources and feedstuffs Feeding costs in dehesa farms ( /ha) Total cost per feed (grazing + feedstuffs) /ha Feedstuffs /ha Grazing (pasture+mast-feeding) Dehesa farm 88 89 176 Mixed beef, sheep, pig 151 155 306 Small sheep 65 168 233 Medium beef cattle 66 81 147 Large sheep farms 62 78 140

Conclusions In dehesa systems grazing resources cover a major part of the livestock's requirements especially in beef cattle farms. The use of grazing resources is conditioned by the size of the holding and livestock density The use of the pasture as feed for the livestock is the principal economic utilities in these systems, Reduced livestock feed costs compared with more intensive systems. The greatest costs are in acorn feeding of Iberian pig

Thanks for your attention pgaspar@unex.es