Application Note 00394

Similar documents
Application Note. Abstract. Authors. Introduction. Environmental

On-line SPE-LC/MS/MS to Detect Organonitrogen and Triazine Pesticides at 10ng/L in Drinking Water

Quantitation of cyanotoxins in drinking water according to EPA 544 guidelines

EPA Method 543: Selected Organic Contaminants by Online SPE LC/MS/MS Using the Agilent Flexible Cube

Development of a Fast and Cost-Effective Multi-Residue Method to Determine Pesticides in Tobacco by LC/MS/MS

Improving Sensitivity in Bioanalysis using Trap-and-Elute MicroLC-MS

Improved SPE for UPLC/MS Determination of Diquat and Paraquat in Environmental

Automated Online SPE for LC/MS/MS Analysis of Trace Organic Contaminants in Water Using the Agilent 1290 Infinity Flexible Cube Module

MultiQuant Software Version 3.0

[ ONGOING DEDICATION TO FOOD SAFETY ]

Rapid Extraction of Therapeutic Oligonucleotides from Primary Tissues for LC/ MS Analysis Using Clarity OTX, an Oligonucleotide Extraction Cartridge

ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN DRINKING WATER AS PER BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS USING THE AGILENT 7000 GC/MS/MS WITH PESTICIDES ANALYZER

Extraction and Analysis of Neonicotinoid Pesticides using QuEChERS Approach

Exploring Extra Sensitivity Using ionkey/ms with the Xevo G2-XS Q-Tof HRMS for Small Molecule Pharmaceutical Analysis in Human Plasma

[ ONGOING DEDICATION TO FOOD SAFETY ]

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Environmental. Edgar Naegele Agilent Technologies, Inc. Waldbronn, Germany

Thermo Scientific TSQ Quantum Access MAX

Determination of Oxalate and Other Anions in Bayer Liquor Using Ion Chromatography

Application of Agilent AdvanceBio Desalting-RP Cartridges for LC/MS Analysis of mabs A One- and Two-dimensional LC/MS Study

Minimize Method Development Time for Pesticide Screening Using LC/MS Application Kit

Chem 321 Lecture 23 - Liquid Chromatography 11/19/13

Optimization of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis by Automated Headspace Using Method Development Tools

mab Titer Analysis with the Agilent Bio-Monolith Protein A Column

Aflatoxin & Ochratoxin Analysis. A Completely Automated Solution with the Freestyle, ThermELUTE, and SMART Immunoaffinity Cleanup Columns

Analysis of 16 Pesticide Residues in Broccoli Using CarbonX dspe QuEChERS AOAC Kits Using GC/MS

The Importance of High Speed Data Acquisition in the Design and Implementation of GC/MS Applications

Puzzled About LCMS? Sample. Sensitivity in Mass Spec Analysis. Prep. Adapting LC-UV. Optimizing and Maintaining Your Mass Spec LCMS

Confident Pesticides Analysis with the Agilent LC/Triple Quadrupole and TOF/QTOF Solutions

Validation Report 19

Characterize Fab and Fc Fragments by Cation-Exchange Chromatography

On-Line. User s Guide SPE CARTRIDGES. for Rapid Cleanup and Extraction of Analytes

Concentration of Human Hormones in Drinking Water Using Solid Phase Extraction and Analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography

DETERMINATION OF MYCOTOXINE DEOXYNIVALENOL IN WHEAT FLOUR AND WHEAT BRAN

ENHANCED MS WITH THE TURN OF A KEY

Featuring Analyst software under Windows NT for enhanced performance and ease of use. API 150EX. LC/MS System

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Biotherapeutics and Biologics. Sonja Schneider Agilent Technologies, Inc. Waldbronn, Germany

Certified Reference Material - Certificate of Analysis

Accurately Identify and Quantify One Hundred Pesticides in a Single GC Run

Size Exclusion Chromatography of Biosimilar and Innovator Insulin Using the Agilent AdvanceBio SEC column

Maximizing Chromatographic Resolution of Peptide Maps using UPLC with Tandem Columns

Analysis of Glyphosate and AMPA in Environmental Water Samples by Ion Chromatography and On-Line Mass Spectrometry with Minimal Sample Preparation

Development of a Clinical Research Method for the Measurement of Testosterone. Dihydrotestosterone

International Journal of Pharma Research & Review, Feb 2014; 3(2):11-16 ISSN:

State of the art in chromatographic analysis (LC MS/MS) of steroidal estrogens in surface water Status and Outlook

Key Words Q Exactive Focus, SIEVE Software, Biomarker, Discovery, Metabolomics

Monitoring for Microcystins in Raw Water Supply Reservoirs Using the Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS

A Fast and Robust Linear ph Gradient Separation Platform for Monoclonal Antibody (MAb) Charge Variant Analysis

CAMAG TLC-MS INTERFACE 2

Agilent 6430 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS System

Generating Automated and Efficient LC/MS Peptide Mapping Results with the Biopharmaceutical Platform Solution with UNIFI

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Biopharmaceuticals. Verified for Agilent 1260 Infinity II LC Bio-inert System. Sonja Schneider

Analysis of Suspected Flavor and Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetics Using the 7890A GC and Capillary Column Backflush Application

Tyler Trent, Applications Sales Specialist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Cell Clone Selection Using the Agilent Bio-Monolith Protein A Column and LC/MS

Genotoxicity is the property of a compound

Rapid Soft Spot Analysis using the SCIEX Routine Biotransform Solution

Quality-by-Design-Based Method Development Using an Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC

Low-level Detection of Ethanol, 1,4-Dioxane, and Other Oxygenates Using the Eclipse Purge-and-Trap Sample Concentrator

A Sub-picogram Quantification Method for Desmopressin in Plasma using the SCIEX Triple Quad 6500 System

Quantitative determination of residual 2-(2-chloroethoxy) ethanol (CEE) in quetiapine fumarate by gas chromatogaraphy

Disulfide Linkage Analysis of IgG1 using an Agilent 1260 Infinity Bio inert LC System with an Agilent ZORBAX RRHD Diphenyl sub 2 µm Column

HIGHER IMPACT LC/MS DIAGNOSTICS AGILENT IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICES FOR CLINICAL LABORATORIES

Ion Exchange Chromatography. Learning Objectives:

High Resolution Accurate Mass Peptide Quantitation on Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Mass Spectrometers. The world leader in serving science

ISSN India; g,secunderabad. Abstractt. a flow rate. of 1ml/min. di hydrogen. which acts. and chronic. including minimize (5) Figure

A green HPLC technique with a 100% water mobile phase for detecting imidacloprid and its metabolite 6-chloronicotinic acid

Laboratory Water Quality Affects Protein Separation by 2D Gel Electrophoresis

Analysis of Stainless Steel by Dual View Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 61

PLRP-S Polymeric Reversed-Phase Column for LC/MS Separation of mabs and ADC

Application Note. Authors. Abstract

Composition Analysis of Animal Feed by HR ICP-OES

Automated Real-Time Determination of Bromate in Drinking Water Using LC-ICP-MS and EPA Method Application

Preparative HPLC is still the

CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY

Fast mass transfer Fast separations High throughput and improved productivity Long column lifetime Outstanding reproducibility Low carryover

Validation Report 16

Physical Stability of a Silica- Based Size Exclusion Column for Antibody Analysis

SAFEFOODERA-EMTOX project 7 FP Dr. E. Ioannou Kakouri, Chief Chemist, EFSA focal point

N-Glycan Profiling Analysis of a Monoclonal Antibody Using UHPLC/FLD/Q-TOF

A Fast and Effective Approach for Running EPA Method 539: Determination of Hormones in Drinking Water using SPE and LC/MS/MS

Converting a Liquid-Liquid Extraction Method for Vitamin D to a 96-Well Plate Supported Liquid Extraction Format

TechnicalNOTE METABOLYNX EXACT MASS DEFECT FILTER: RAPIDLY DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN TRUE METABOLITES AND FALSE POSITIVES INTRODUCTION

QuickTox Kit for T-2 / HT-2 Flex

HPLC METHODOLOGY MANUAL

Method Translation in Liquid Chromatography

Bio-Monolith Protein G Column - More Options for mab Titer Determination

AB SCIEX TripleTOF 5600 SYSTEM. High-resolution quant and qual

Protocol for Quantitative Determination of Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates Prepared by: Amanda Rigdon, May 23 rd, 2016

Using HRAM Survey Analysis Combined with Rapid MS2 Data to Develop a Fragmentation Based Detection Workflow for Structure ID Acquisition

Measurement of Hepcidin-25 in Serum Using the Agilent 6490 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS with ifunnel Technology

IgG Purity/Heterogeneity and SDS-MW Assays with High- Speed Separation Method and High Throughput Tray Setup

Gas Chromatography Assignment Chem 543/443

Quantification of Drug Metabolites in Early-Stage Drug Discovery Testing

Separation and Quantitation of a Mixture of Alcohols by Gas Chromatography

Sprint analysis of lubricating oils using the Thermo Scientific icap 7600 ICP-OES

CERTIFICATION. Certificate No. The AOAC Research Institute hereby certifies that the performance of the test kit known as: manufactured by

A Complete Workflow Solution for Intact Monoclonal Antibody Characterization Using a New High-Performance Benchtop Quadrupole- Orbitrap LC-MS/MS

Determination of Trace Copper, Nickel, and Zinc in Boiling Water Reactors Using Nonsuppressed Conductivity Detection

Transcription:

Application Note 00394 Multi Component Mycotoxin Analysis using LC/MS/MS Mahalakshmi Rudrabhatla, Ph.D., Varian, Inc. Introduction Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites of molds, contaminating a wide range of crop plants and fruits before or after harvest, the most important mycotoxins being: aflatoxins, type A trichothecenes, type B trichothecenes, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, fumonisins and patulin. The structures of the mycotoxins are given in figure 1. Fig 1 Structures of most relevant types of mycotoxins Ingestion of food contaminated with mycotoxins was found to induce a variety of toxic responses including kidney damage, liver damage, birth defects and cancer. Mycotoxin contamination is recognized as an unavoidable risk because the formation of fungal toxins is weather dependent and effective prevention is difficult. According to the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) more than 25% of the world s agricultural production is contaminated with mycotoxins. This equates to economic losses estimated at $923 million annually in the US grain industry alone 1. Most countries have adopted regulations to limit exposure to mycotoxins, having strong impact on food and animal crop trade 2. The presence of mycotoxins is unavoidable and therefore testing of raw materials and products is required to keep our food and feed safe. The toxicity and potential health hazards induced by the ingestion of foods contaminated by mycotoxins demands the need for sensitive, robust and rugged analytical methodologies. Current methods include gas chromatography electron capture detection 3, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) 4, Liquid chromatography (LC)- post column derivitization and fluorescence detection 5, Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry with fast atom bombardment (LC/MS-FAB) 6 and Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) 7. LC/MS/MS is highly specific, broadly applicable and is rich in providing both qualitative and quantitative information. Current LC/MS/MS methods are unable to detect all the relevant groups of mycotoxins in a single run. We developed a sensitive LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of 6 groups of mycotoxins, namely aflatoxins, fumonisins, type A and B trichothecenes, zearalenone and its metabolites, ochratoxin A and patulin and validated the method in a corn matrix. Instrumentation Varian 320-MS LC/MS/MS equipped with an ESI source Varian Prostar 210 solvent delivery system (2) Varian Prostar 430 autosampler Materials and Reagents All the reagents and mycotoxins other than Nivalenol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co, St. Louis, MO, Nivalenol was purchased from Romer Labs, 1301 Stylemaster Drive, Union, MO. Fumonisin B3 was provided by Darsa Siantar, ATL Laboratories, 490 N Wiget Lane, Walnut Creek, CA.

Sample Preparation 25 g of corn flakes were ground to a fine powder. The powder was dissolved in 50 ml of 80:20 methanol water. 2.5 g of NaCl was added to it. The mixture was stirred for 2 hrs at high speed on a magnetic stirrer. The extract was then filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filtered extract was diluted 5 times with mobile phase buffer A (0.1% acetic acid in 10% methanol in water). Finally, 0.1-450 ppb of multimycotoxin mix was spiked into the extract for calibration. All the mycotoxins other than zearalenone were analysed by external standard analysis. Zearalanone was used as an internal standard at 75 ppb. It was used to quantify the target analyte zearalenone. Conditions LC Conditions Column Polaris C-18A 5µm, 150 mm x3.0 mm ID (Varian part No A2000150x030) Buffer A Buffer B Injection solvent Injection volume 10 µl COOH in 10% methanol COOH in 100% methanol COOH in 10% methanol LC program Time % A % B Flow ml/min 00.00 100 0 0.285 25.00 15 85 0.285 25.01 100 0 0.4 35.00 100 0 0.4 Table 1 LC program API Conditions Ionization Mode Collision Gas API Drying Gas API Nebulizing Gas SIM Width Needle ESI (positive and negative) 1.8 mtorr Argon 30 psi at 250 C 50 psi 0.7 amu 4500 V Capillary Scanning (table 2.0) Shield Detector 600 V 1900 V MS/MS parameters Capillary (V) Q1 Ion polarity Q3 (1) CE1(V) Q3 ( 2) CE2 (V) Nivalenol 59 311.1 [M-H]- 281.0 8.00 191.0 19.0 0.3 Patulin 40 153.1 [M-H]- 108.9 7.00 81.00 10.0 0.3 Deoxynivalenol 40 295.0 [M-H]- 265.0 11.5 138.0 11.5 0.3 Fusarenon X 40 353.0 [M-H]- 187.0 29.0 205.0 9.50 0.3 Aflatoxin G2 90 331.0 [M+H]+ 245.0 16.5 275.0 11.5 0.3 Aflatoxin G1 90 329.0 [M+H]+ 283.0 25.5 243.0 25.5 0.3 Aflatoxin B2 63 315.0 [M+H]+ 287.0 21.5 259.0 10.0 0.3 Aflatoxin B1 63 313.0 [M+H]+ 245.0 16.5 241.0 22.0 0.3 Fumonisin B1 54 720.9 [M-H]- 157.0 33.0 563.0 24.0 0.3 Fumonisin B2 95 704.8 [M-H]- 157.0 33.0 548.0 22.0 0.3 Fumonisin B3 95 704.6 [M-H]- 546.0 33.0 159.0 33.0 0.3 T2 toxin 85 484.0 [M+NH 4 ]+ 305.0 18.5 117.0 13.5 0.3 OchratoxinA 70 402.7 [M-H]- 358.0 18.5 167.0 34.0 0.3 Zearalanone 85 319.0 [M-H]- 136.0 26.5 187.0 28.5 0.3 α-zearalenol 90 319.0 [M-H]- 174.0 25.5 159.0 27.5 0.3 β-zearalenol 100 319.0 [M-H]- 275.0 16.0 187.0 23.0 0.3 Zearalenone (IS) 70 317.0 [M-H]- 185.0 24.5 187.0 18.5 0.3 Table 2 MS/MS scan parameters for the detection of 16 mycotoxins in the positive and negative ESI mode Dwell (sec)

Discussion The MS parameters were optimized by infusing 100 ppb of the individual mycotoxin at 10 µl/min flow rate through a syringe pump. The electrospray ionization parameters such as drying gas temperature, drying gas pressure and nebulizing gas pressure were optimized by flow injection. An LC-MS/MS method was developed that achieved good separation and sensitivity for the detection of all the 16 mycotoxins studied. Figure 2 gives the MS chromatogram of the 16 mycotoxins that were separated and detected in a single run. Calibrations of mycotoxins were done in solvent and also in matrix (corn extract). Details are summarized in Table 3. Best sensitivity was found for aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 in the positive ESI mode and β-zol and fumonisins in the negative mode. S.No Range (PPB) Linearity LOQ (PPB) 1 Nivalenol 1-400 0.999 6.25 2 Patulin 1-400 0.999 1.00 3 Deoxynivalenol 1-400 0.998 3.50 4 Fusarenon X 1-400 0.998 6.25 5 Aflatoxin G2 0.1-192 0.998 0.12 6 Aflatoxin G1 0.1-192 0.998 0.20 7 Aflatoxin B2 0.1-192 0.996 0.12 8 Aflatoxin B1 0.1-192 0.983 0.20 9 Fumonisin B1 0.1-384 0.999 1.75 10 T2 toxin 0.1-384 0.995 0.50 11 α-zearalenol 0.1-384 0.998 0.50 12 Fumonisin B2 0.1-384 0.998 1.00 13 Fumonisin B3 0.1-384 0.995 1.00 14 β-zearalenol 0.1-384 0.997 1.00 15 Zearalanone(ISTD) 0.1-384 0.987 1.00 16 Zearalenone 0.1-384 0.994 1.00 17 Ochratoxin A 0.1-384 0.965 0.80 Table 3 Range, linearity and LOQ s of the mycotoxins spiked in solvent The LOQ s in corn matrix were compared with the detection limits set by FAO 2003 2 (Table 4.0). LOQs are based on a peakto-peak signal to noise of 10. Examples of some of the calibration curves generated with the standard mycotoxins in solvent and corn extract are given in figures 4, 5 and 6, respectively. Fig 2 Normalized chromatograms of the 16 mycotoxins in the multi-component method. The numbered label on each chromatogram corresponds to the respective mycotoxins given in Table 3. In this method, aflatoxins were detected in the positive mode; ZON, α-zol, β-zol, type A and B trichothecenes (except for T2 toxin) were detected in the negative mode. Polarity switching was incorporated in the last segment to simultaneously determine T2 toxin that elutes in the positive mode and other mycotoxins in the negative mode.

Figure 4 Calibration curve of patulin spiked in solvent Figure 6 Calibration curve of β-zearalenol spiked in corn extract. The LOQ s in corn matrix were compared with the detection limits set by FAO 2003 (2) (Table 4.0). LOQs are based on a peak-to-peak signal to noise of 10. LOQ s (µg/kg) of Mycotoxins in corn extract with the multi component method World wide limits (ug/kg) for mycotoxins in food. (FAO,2003) Deoxynivalenol 11.4 300-2000 Aflatoxin B1 1.14 1-35 Aflatoxin B2 0.34 1-35 Afaltoxin G1 1.14 1-35 Aflatoxin G2 0.34 1-35 Fumonisin B1 1.75 1000-3000 Fumonisin B2 8.00 1000-3000 Fumonisin B3 8.00 1000-3000 Zearalenone 10.0 50-100 Ochratoxin A 8.00 3-50 Patulin 2.00 5-100 Table 4 LOQ s of mycotoxins (injection vol=10 µl) in comparison with the world wide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feed in 2003. Figure 5 Calibration curve of nivalenol spiked in solvent.

All the mycotoxins detected were within the range for the detection limits set by FAO. Area reproducibility of this method was tested in corn matrix by spiking mycotoxins mix at low concentrations i.e., around the limits of detection and quatitation. The relative standard deviation (RSDs) for different mycotoxins is given in table 5. Low Range Conc. (µg/kg) RSD% Medium range Conc. (µg/kg) RSD% Afla B1 7.20 10.4 35.10 5.91 Afla G1 2.16 15.2 10.70 6.52 Afla G2 2.16 11.1 10.70 6.16 DON 7.20 8.42 35.10 6.22 T2 7.20 7.73 35.10 5.08 ZON 7.20 ND 35.10 9.32 β-zol 7.20 10.4 3.510 1.79 FB1 14.3 17.5 71.41 6.22 FB2 14.3 17.3 71.41 4.10 FB3 14.3 4.78 71.41 7.60 NIV 14.3 10.1 71.41 7.05 Table 5 Area reproducibility of the spiked mycotoxin mix in corn extract at low levels. (n = 10) References 1. Council for Agriculture Science and Technology. Mycotoxins:Economic and Health Risks. Report 116, Council for Agriculture Science and Technology. Ames, IA. 1989. Cited in Miller 1995. 2. World wide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feed in 2003, FAO food and nutrition paper, 81, 3.1-3.5 2003. 3. Scott, P.M; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 65, 876, 1982. 4. Thais V. Milanez and Lucia M Valente-soaresh. J Braz.Chem Soc., Vol17, No.2, 412-416, 2006. 5. M Ofitserova, D Siantar, S Nerkar, M.pickering, MA203. pp 1-2. 2005 6. Kostianinen, R. and Kuronen, P. J.Chromatogr. 543: 39-47, 1991. 7. Biselli S, Hartiq L, Weqner H and Hummer C. Recent applications in LC-MS LCGC Eur., 25-31 2004. The 320-MS provides excellent reproducibility in this matrix with no clean up, even at very low levels. Since no sample preparation is required, throughput and cost of analysis are greatly reduced. Conclusions Performance of the multi component method has been demonstrated in this application with excellent results for all the 16 mycotoxins in a single run. Due to the high selectivity and sensitivity of the 320-MS, corn samples can be analysed without any prior clean up. The limit of quantitation for all the 16 mycotoxins analyzed by this multi component method are in agreement with the limits set by FAO. These data represent typical results. For further information, contact your local Varian Sales Office. Varian, Inc. www.varianinc.com North America: 800.926.3000 925.939.2400 Europe The Netherlands: 31.118.67.1000 Asia Pacific Australia: 613.9560.7133 SI-0394 Latin America Brazil: 55.11.3845.0444