A GUIDE TO STREAM RESTORATION

Similar documents
NJDEP Regulations that impact or soon will impact agricultural operations. April 1, 2007 Horses 2007

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTIONS

Monitoring for Water Quality Improvements in Deep Creek, MT

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

STREAM STABILIZATION PLAN

STREAMBANK RESTORATION DESIGN

Managing Iowa Habitats:

West Fork White River Watershed Conservation Map Summaries. Prepared for the Beaver Watershed Alliance. By the Watershed Conservation Resource Center

Notice No Closing Date: May 12, 2017

Working Lands for Wildlife. Wildlife Habitat Financial Assistance Targeted for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

Stream Watch Visual Survey Instructions

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

South St. Vrain / Hall Meadows Restoration Planning August 20, 2015

Stream Corridor Protection and Adaptive Management Manual. Prepared for the City of Independence, Missouri

RIPARIAN PROTECTION Questions & Answers

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

Good morning, Chairman Yaw, Chairman Yudichak, Chairman Vulakovich, Chairman Costa,

PRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.)

DECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing

iswm TM Criteria Manual City of Azle Section 14 City of Azle Subdivision Ordinance DRAFT-June Chapter 1

RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFER

CHAPTER 6 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS APPLYING TO SHORELAND AREAS AND PUBLIC WATERS

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE DESIGN GUIDE

Appendix D - Evaluation of Interim Solutions

Department of the Army Permit Application

3.3 HYDROLOGY INTRODUCTION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. A. Forest Plan Standards. B. Clean Water Act

Project Goals and Scoping

Government Conservation Programs

f) Culverts in series shall be spaced at least 20 feet between each other. 2.7 C Culverts

Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Provide flood damage reduction projects that t work, with appropriate regard for community and natural values.

Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest

Brush layering construction

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

SKAGIT COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINDINGS OF FACT. APPLICATION NUMBER: Shoreline Substantial Development Application PL

Public Notice ISSUED: August 11, 2015 EXPIRES: September 10, 2015

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Intermittent Stream Reclamation

Regional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

Manure Storage for Environmental Management Systems

FEMA s Mitigation Support for Resiliency: Innovative Drought and Flood Mitigation Projects

When the land division tree preservation requirements apply

Information for File # PRH

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Bureau of Mining and Minerals Regulation. Regulation of Mines. Howard J. Hayes, Program Administrator

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

iv) Alberta fish weirs

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

The total population of the township is 9,942 (2015 Five-Year American Community Survey [ACS]). The median household income is over $109,000.

Riparian Buffer Plantings. Image: Virginia Outdoor Foundation

PRENTISS CREEK (SUB-E) KENSINGTON PLACE CONCEPT PLAN VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE, ILLINOIS AUGUST, 2011

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

Technology News from the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program October 1999

MODEL LAND USE REGULATIONS

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

Extended Detention Basin Maintenance Plan for [[== Insert Project Name ==]]

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Riparian Areas and Grazing Range 101

Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment. September 1995

Application for resource consent Form B Damming and diversion of water

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities

PUBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

BMPs TO CONSERVE WOODED AREAS AT THE SUBDIVISION LEVEL

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

SECTION 5.4 LOGJAM REMOVAL AND RIVER RESTORATION

Upper Mississippi River Conference 2016 Action Agenda: Raise the Grade

Visual Assessment of Riparian Health

Small Project Proposal

THE EVOLUTION OF EROSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY. Welcome! Pete Hanrahan, CPESC E. J. Prescott, Inc. Gardiner, Maine

Rangeland Conservation Effects Assessment Program (CEAP)

A Summary Guide to the. Rifle River WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN. Know Your Watershed Protect Its Resources

SECTION 3 NATURAL RESOURCES

Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

Pend Oreille County Shoreline Bank Stabilization Guide

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina April 24, 2017

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Very slight to negligible limitations no special land management practices required.

REMR Technical Note GT-SE-1.5 BIOENGINEERING TECHNIQUE OF RESERVOIR SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL IN GERMANY

Economics of Implementing Two-stage Channels

Living Shorelines & Coastal Resiliency: A Consultants Perspective. Presented by: Bethany Bearmore, P.E. Louis Berger

Joint Public Notice. LOCATION: In Salmon Bay, Lake Washington Ship Canal, at Seattle, Washington.

Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites

SEATTLE DISTRICT CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Prescribed Burning as a Habitat Management Tool

Transcription:

A GUIDE TO STREAM RESTORATION Restoration of stream resources occurs for many reasons. You might be interested in goals of: Reducing and preventing further bank erosion, Increasing your property value, Improved fishing, Maintaining and improving water quality and quantity. Lots of resources are available as you evaluate your streams health and your options for restoration. This guide is a designed to get you started. G a l l a t i n C o u n t y E x t e n s i o n B r a d B a u e r ( 4 0 6 ) 3 8 8-3 2 1 3 b r a d. b a u e r @ m o n t a n a. e d u

CALANDER OF STREAM RESTORATION Timing your restoration efforts can influence the success of your project. Technique Riparian Fencing Primary Timing Year round Willow/Shrub Planting Spring prior to bud break Bank Revetment Bank Bioengineering Fall/Winter during low flows; Spring prior to high flows Fall/Winter during low flows; Spring prior to high flows

STREAM RESTORATION: RIPARIAN FENCING Creating a streamside vegetation (riparian) pasture can go a long ways: Pros: Leaves existing riparian vegetation in place. Provides additional pasture management options. Simple. Cons: Possibly long term before achieving stream restoration goals. Water needs to be provided for livestock either in offsite water or in water gaps DEFRA Considerations: Riparian pastures can become weedy. Grazing should be timed to reduce and suppress weeds. Heavily deteriorated riparian systems might need additional input (see following pages).

STREAM RESTORATION: RIPARIAN FENCING Strategies: Reduce wildlife damage to fences by follow the FWP s recommendations in How to Build Fence with Wildlife in Mind * Consider a temporary fence, laydown fence, or leaving fences open when pastures are not being used. Fence a large enough area to serve as an short term riparian pasture. Improve the success of your fence layout by fencing livestock out of steep or tight draws that dead end at your riparian fence. DEFRA *http://fwp.mt.gov/fwpdoc.html?id=57573

STREAM RESTORATION: WILLOW/SHRUB PLANTING Augmenting existing streamside vegetation (riparian) can speed the restoration process and potentially reduce erosion: Pros: Leaves existing riparian vegetation in place. Establishes willows and shrubs at key locations. Uses free or cheap planting material that is local to your riparian systems. Cons: Possibly long term before achieving stream restoration goals. Grazing should be excluded while willows/shrubs are established. Considerations: Streamside vegetation can reduce erosion but may be difficult to establish at areas prone to erosion. Heavily deteriorated riparian systems might need additional input (see following pages).

STREAM RESTORATION: WILLOW/SHRUB PLANTING Strategies: Planting material can be locally collected. Willows can grow new roots along stem material. Therefore, willows can be planted from cuttings. Soak cuttings for up to a week to improve planting success. Cuttings (1/2 1 inch in diameter) should be collected in the spring before the buds have opened. Cuttings should be inserted into the bank so that they are still wet when the stream level is at low flow. Excess material should be cutoff so that the cutting extends out of the ground no more than 6 inches. Species Group Cuttings Transplant Mature and potted willows/shrubs can be transplanted in the fall and spring when the plants are still dormant. Plant transplants so they are at the same depth from where they were dug. Planting success maybe improved if above ground branches are trimmed bank to within 6 12 inches of the ground. Alder Aspen Boxelder Planting material can also be purchased through the DNRC State Nursery (406) 542-4244 X X X Cottonwood X X Dogwood Mod X Willow X X

STREAM RESTORATION: BANK REVETMENT Revetment is the organic version of riprap and includes bundles of brush, roots, trees, and fiber rolls. Pros: Armors streambanks using material that is breakdown overtime and become part of the stream. Can be easily installed at key locations. Uses free or cheap material that is local to your riparian systems. Cons: Possibly long term before achieving stream restoration goals. Works poorly on high-energy streams. Often requires heavy equipment to move material. USDA Considerations: Works best when used in combination of willow/shrub planting (see previous page) and other revegetation efforts. Heavily deteriorated riparian systems might need additional input (see following pages).

Strategies: STREAM RESTORATION: BANK REVETMENT It is important that revetment material is tight to the bank surface and does not allow water to pool between it and the bank. Extend the material below low flow levels and above high flow levels. Revetment material should be anchored securely to the bank to reduce outwash during high flow. Avoid extending revetment material into the channel which might cause downstream erosion. USDA

STREAM RESTORATION: STREAMBANK BIOENGINEERING Bank engineering includes recontouring banks to increase streambank slope, realignment with historic channels, and reconnecting the stream to historic floodplains. Pros: Quickly recovery to stream restoration goals. Increased stream function. Effective on high-energy streams. Before Cons: Requires expert design and installation. High cost. Considerations: Works best when used in combination with all the previous restoration techniques (see previous pages) and other revegetation efforts. After

STREAM RESTORATION: STREAMBANK BIOENGINEERING Strategies: Streams are naturally dynamic and move across the landscape. Avoid using materials that are not native and designs that lock your stream into a configuration. Understanding your stream in both high and low flows is very important to the ultimate success of streambank bioengineering. Know the stream above and below your reach. Bioengineered streambanks should allow streams to dissipate the energy of flooding either across the existing floodplain or a designed, inset floodplain. Before The design of bioengineered streambanks may require working with an expert. After

PERMITS NEEDED FOR STREAM RESTORATION Guide to Required Permits: A. Montana Stream Protections Act FWP (406) 444-2449 B. Storm Water Discharge General Permits DEQ- (406) 444-2406 C. Streamside Management Zone Law DNRC-(406) 542-4300 D. Montana Floodplain and Floodway Management Act DNRC-(406) 542-4300 E. Short-term Exemption from Montana s Surface Water Quality Standards DEQ- (406) 444-2406 F. Montana Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act DNRC-(406) 444-6667 G. Montana Land-use License or Easement on Navigable Waters DNRC-(406) 444-2074 H. Montana Water Use Act DNRC-(406) 444-6610 I. Federal Clear Water Act-U.S. Army Corp-(406) 444-6670 J. Federal Rivers and Harbors Act-U.S. Army Corp-(406) 444-6670 K. City of County Floodplain Development Permit L. Other lows that May Apply This information courteously of Montana Department of Natural Resources

NEED FURTHER HELP AND INSPIRATION? Help and Guidance: Montana State University Extension Gallatin County (406) 388-3213 Montana Associating of Conservation Districts-(406) 443-5711 Montana Department of Natural Resources-(406) 444-6601 Montana Watershed Coordinating Council-(406) 475-1420 Grants and Loans for Restoration: Opportunities to offset the cost of restoration http://dnrc.mt.gov/cardd/loans_grants/ Other Resources: Opportunities to offset the cost of restoration http://dnrc.mt.gov/cardd/loans_grants/ Sources: Opportunities to offset the cost of restoration http://dnrc.mt.gov/cardd/loans_grants/ FWP, NRCS,