Working with the Water Balance

Similar documents
M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Overview of the Surface Hydrology of Hawai i Watersheds. Ali Fares Associate Professor of Hydrology NREM-CTAHR

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

Climate Change & Urbanization Have Changed River Flows in Ontario

The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply

Planning Beyond the Supply/Demand Gap: Water Supply Vulnerabilities in New Mexico Presented by NM Universities Working Group on Drought

Vegetation Management and Water Yield: Silver Bullet or a Pipe Dream?

Application of a Basin Scale Hydrological Model for Characterizing flow and Drought Trend

INTRODUCTION TO HOBBY FARMING AND WATER QUALITY

Lecture 19. Landfill hydrology

Hydrologic Modeling with the Distributed-Hydrology- Soils- Vegetation Model (DHSVM)

Rainwater Management. Dr. Iftikhar Ahmad. College of Earth and. University of The Punjab Lahore

Urbanization effects on the hydrology of the Atlanta area, Georgia (USA)

July, International SWAT Conference & Workshops

Electric Forward Market Report

Green Infrastructure BMPs. Hydrologic Performance Small Storms

Leila Talebi and Robert Pitt. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Alabama, P.O. Box , Tuscaloosa

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

CHAPTER FIVE Runoff. Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323) Instructors: Dr. Yunes Mogheir Dr. Ramadan Al Khatib. Overland flow interflow

Quantification of lake water level influences for Wawasee and Syracuse lakes: Lake and watershed water budgets for 2011, 2012, and 2013

Chehalis Basin Strategy Causes of Extreme Flooding. October 11, 2016 Policy Workshop

Runoff Processes. Daene C. McKinney

NREM 407/507 WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

Introduction. Welcome to the Belgium Study Abroad Program. Courses:

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

Urban Greening and the UHI: Seasonal Trade-offs in Heating and Cooling Energy Consumption in Manchester, UK

SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWALS & LOW FLOW PROTECTION POLICY MICHAEL COLLEGE, P.E. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

An investment model for large-scale green

Stormwater and LEED. Vancouver LEED User s Group May 27, Craig Kipkie, M.Sc., P.Eng, LEED AP

Soil Temperature Damping Depth in Boreal Plain Forest Stands and Clear Cuts: Comparison of Measured Depths versus Predicted based upon SWAT Algorithms

Hydrology and Water Management. Dr. Mujahid Khan, UET Peshawar

12/28/2016. Air. Surface Water. Ground Water. Soil. 1. Calculate agronomic rate. 2. Identify optimal fields. 3. Determine when to apply

Regional Habitat Indicators Project. Workshop #1. Nov 9, 2016

Crop Water Requirement. Presented by: Felix Jaria:

Methods of Streamflow Analysis

Modeling Your Water Balance

General Instream Flow Methods Overview. Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24, 2011

Comparison of Recharge Estimation Methods Used in Minnesota

Trees and the work you do provide multiple benefits

Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed

IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS

Why Tree Canopy Land Uses in Phase 6?

Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

Streamlines V2, n2 (May 1997) A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators

NATURAL FEATURES, LAND SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS

1.6 Influence of Human Activities and Land use Changes on Hydrologic Cycle

3.3 Paw Paw River, Michigan

Climate change and the Ecohydrology of Australia: Future Research Needs

Eco-hydrological assessment of German lowland catchments experiences and challenges- N. Fohrer, B. Schmalz, G. HörmannH

The Sustainability of Floods Pond

Water balance of savannah woodlands: a modelling study of the Sudanese gum belt region

Biogeochemistry of Wetlands: Wetland hydrology

The Confluence Model. Presentation to Modeling and Forecasting Working Group January 21, 2015

What Are Environmental (Instream) Flows?

Surface Soil Moisture Assimilation with SWAT

Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. Gregg J. Cassidy RI DEM, Sustainable Watersheds Office

Catchment restoration challenges

Where Did the Water Go?: Watershed Study Middle School Sample Classroom Assessment

Transactions. American Geophysical Union Volume 28, Number 1 February 1947

United Water Conservation District November 2016 Hydrologic Conditions Report 2017 Water Year. December 6, 2016

EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES RESPONSE TO METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT IN THESSALY, GREECE

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Virginia and North Carolina (Section 216)

Continued Extreme Drought Conditions. April 1, 2015 Snowpack was lowest ever recorded. Impacts and Risk to People and Nature

Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change: A California case study

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Lower Columbia River Pile Dike Assessment

Estimation of Irrigation Water Requirement of Maize (Zea-mays) using Pan Evaporation Method in Maiduguri, Northeastern Nigeria

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

Urban Rainwater Harvesting Systems: Promises and Challenges

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Introducing the WBG Guidelines for selecting EFlow assessment methods. Cate Brown

Hydro-climatic modelling workshop UNSW - MDB Water policy challenges and innovation

Over 150 Years of Irrigation Implications for Montana s Water Resources

Narragansett Bay and Watershed Restoration Bond Fund

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Criteria for the Creation and Restoration of Wetlands

Paraprofessional Training Session 1

I/I Analysis & Water Balance Modelling. Presented by Paul Edwards

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

National Integrated Drought Information System Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Chattahooche-Flint River Basin. 14 August 2012

Moose-vehicle collisions in Massachusetts: the need for speed... reduction

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

Implementing Stormwater Management through Split-Flow Drainage Design

Comparison of Statistical and Dynamic Downscaling methods for Hydrologic Applications in West Central Florida

Coupling SWAT with land cover and hydropower models for sustainable development in the Mekong Basin

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

NBI strategic water resources analysis Phase I findings

Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development

Rock Creek Floodplain Analysis

Organics Collection Program and Yard Material Pile Collection Update

Trees and Structural Soils A New Stormwater Management Practice for Sustainable Urban Sites

Hydrologic Analysis Techniques ( 87 Manual Hydrology Tools )

Re-plumbing Roadside Ditch Networks

EFFECTS OF WATERSHED TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS, LAND USE, AND CLIMATE ON BASEFLOW HYDROLOGY IN HUMID REGIONS: A REVIEW

Small-scale irrigation development in the wetlands of South-West Ethiopia

The Science Behind Quantifying Urban Forest Ecosystem Services. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

Transcription:

Working with the Water Balance Forest Hydrology and Land Use Change Paul K. Barten, Ph.D. Professor of Forestry and Hydrology Department of Environmental Conservation www.forest-to-faucet.org The Living Filter Hillsborough 1

www.epa.gov Flow chart of the hydrologic cycle Reprinted from: Satterlund, D.R. and P.W. Adams. 1992. Wildland Watershed Management. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 448 pp. Hillsborough 2

The Water Balance P -ET -Q ± S = P - (E + T + I) -(Q OF + Q SSF + Q GW ) ± (S SNOW + S SOIL + S WETLANDS +S LAKES + S STREAMS + S BIOMASS ) = where: f (Energy Balance, time, terrain, land use, climate, etc.) P = precipitation ET = evapotranspiration Q = streamflow + groundwater recharge S = water storage (in soils, wetlands, lakes and ponds) deceptively simple and remarkably powerful tool Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy Focus on compensatory changes (use deductive reasoning) ET is the biological variable (positive or negative) S and Q are the physical variables water quality follows (+ or -) When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe. John Muir, 1911 Hillsborough 3

Calendar Year Water Year P ET Q ± S = IF S THEN P ET Q or P Q ET Dormant Season Growing Season Dormant Season Fall recharge snow accumulation Snowmelt (!) leaf-out Growing season leaf fall and dormancy Fall recharge 6 5 Precip. (mm/day) 4 3 2 1 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 31 331 361 3 25 mean air temp. (deg C) 2 15 1 5-5 1 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 31 331 361-1 -15 DORMANT SEASON 22 25 DAYS 1/2 YEAR mean daily streamflow (mm/day) 16 14 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 12 1 8 6 4 2 1 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 31 331 361 Hillsborough 4

6 5 Precip. (mm/day) 4 3 2 1 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 31 331 361 PET (mm/day) 6 5 4 3 2 1 GROWING SEASON 115 145 DAYS 1/2 YEAR 1 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 31 331 361 mean daily streamflow (mm/day) 16 14 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 12 1 8 6 4 2 1 31 61 91 121 151 181 211 241 271 31 331 361 Effects on development on stormflow volume, peak, and timing 2 18 16 Urban Mean daily discharge (CSM) 14 12 1 8 6 4 Suburban Forest (reference) 2 1-Mar-91 15-Mar-91 29-Mar-91 12-Apr-91 26-Apr-91 Figure 8.7 Normalized mean daily discharge ([ft 3 /sec]/mi 2 ) for three gaging stations in the Chickahominy River watershed, Virginia, used by Focazio and Cooper (1995). Solid line = Upham Brook (urbanized, 38 mi 2 ); Dashed line = Chickahominy River at Atlee (residential, 62 mi 2 ); Dotted line = Chickahominy River at Providence Forge (rural, but includes Upham and Atlee subwatersheds, 252 mi 2 ). The period from 29 March to 12 April 1991 corresponds to "Storm 4" in Figure 8.6. Data source: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/va/nwis/discharge? (de la Cretaz and Barten, 27) Hillsborough 5

17 185 192 (Greeley 1925) (Foster and O Keefe 2) Soil surface characteristics influence the pathway, volume, and rate of water movement. Measurable changes in water yield occur when 2 to 3% (area or biomass) of a fully forested watershed is harvested or cleared. Changes in streamflow persist until forest regeneration is 3 to 5 years old in the northeastern United States. Deep-rooted woody vegetation uses more water than shallow-rooted annual plants (crops). Evergreens intercept more precipitation than deciduous trees (2-3% of annual precipitation). Hillsborough 6

17 173 Hillsborough 7

183 Reference Treatment (6-9% agriculture) Treatment relative to Reference P ET Q (Water Year) Forest vegetation Notes Area (% of landscape) Biomass Interception Precipitation (net) Transpiration Evaporation (from bare soil, etc.) Actual Evapotranspiration (E + T + I) Snowmelt Timing (earlier, same, later) Peak flow (lower, same, higher) Annual Water Yield (Q) Overland flow volume Soil erosion rate Riparian forest continuity Sediment delivery to watershed outlet Nutrient loading (NPK) to streams Stream temperature Pathogen loading (wildlife + livestock + humans) Overall Water Quality!!!!!! Hillsborough 8

183 191 Hillsborough 9

Reference Treatment (6 years old, pre-harvest) Treatment relative to Reference P ET Q (Water Year) Forest vegetation Area (% of landscape) Biomass Interception Precipitation (net) Transpiration Evaporation (from bare soil, etc.) Actual Evapotranspiration (E + T + I) Snowmelt Timing (earlier, same, later) Peak flow (lower, same, higher) Annual Water Yield (Q) Overland flow volume Soil erosion rate Riparian forest continuity Sediment delivery to watershed outlet Nutrient loading (NPK) to streams Stream temperature Pathogen loading (wildlife + livestock + humans) Overall Water Quality? Notes 191 Hillsborough 1

193 Reference (evergreen) Treatment (deciduous) Treatment relative to Reference P ET Q (Water Year) Forest vegetation Notes Area (% of landscape) Biomass Interception Precipitation (net) Transpiration Evaporation (from bare soil, etc.) Actual Evapotranspiration (E + T + I) Snowmelt Timing (earlier, same, later) Peak flow (lower, same, higher) Annual Water Yield (Q) Overland flow volume Soil erosion rate Riparian forest continuity Sediment delivery to watershed outlet Nutrient loading (NPK) to streams Stream temperature Pathogen loading (wildlife + livestock + humans) Overall Water Quality?? Hillsborough 11

Changing one part of a forest ecosystem leads to changes in other parts, processes, and patterns (spatial and temporal). Figure 1 Changes in forest cover (%, solid line and circles) on the Prospect Hill Tract of the Harvard Forest, Petersham, Massachusetts and estimated annual water yield (cm, dashed line and diamonds) (Watson and Barten, 1997) 1 % FOREST?? TIME Hillsborough 12

Hillsborough 13

2 23 25 15 1 5 1 31 61 OCT NOV Month October November Rain 65 68 Snowmelt 1 - Evapotranspiration 39 17 Total Storage 9 21 Streamflow 19 32 Hillsborough 14

2 43 26 24 15 1 5 1 DEC 31 JAN 61 FEB 91 MAR 121 APR 151 Month December January February March April Rain 51 15 84 41 Snowmelt 16 12 44 13 ET 1 1 3 29 Total Storage 36 1 32 75-152 Streamflow 54 31 34 61 169 2 26 24 53 27 27 3 15 1 5 1 31 61 91 12 151 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Month May June July August September Rain 64 139 95 44 14 Snowmelt - - - - - ET 62 91 89 14 7 Total Storage -19 4-27 -44 25 Streamflow 25 47 9 5 1 Hillsborough 15