Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

Similar documents
A NEW SEMI-ANALYTICAL LAG-TIME EQUATION FOR APPLICATIONS IN THE KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN AREA. Ricardo A. Gamarra Zapata

Runoff Hydrographs. The Unit Hydrograph Approach

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Peak discharge computation

Engineering Hydrology Class 3

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

NRCS Hydrology methodology review Minnesota NRCS recommendation MnDOT recommendation Using Atlas 14 with HydroCAD

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Determination of watershed historic peak flow rates as the basis for detention basin design

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

5/11/2007. WinTR-55 for Plan Reviews Small Watershed Hydrology Overview

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:

Culvert Sizing procedures for the 100-Year Peak Flow

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

1. Stream Network. The most common approach to quantitatively describing stream networks was postulated by Strahler (1952).

Module 3. Lecture 4: Introduction to unit hydrograph

Pre/Post Assessment Rubric for Unit: Urban Storm Hydrograph Modeling with the Rational Method for the Urban Desert Southwest USA

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA AND DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL

Runoff Processes. Daene C. McKinney

Table of Contents. Overview... 1

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Section 600 Runoff Table of Contents

Chapter 6 Hydrology TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6 - HYDROLOGY

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I

STORMWATER RUNOFF MODELING IMPACTS OF URBANIZATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE

I(n)Kn. A Qp = (PRF) --- (8) tp Where A is the watershed area in square miles and PRF is the unit hydrograph peak rate factor.

4.1 General Methodology and Data Base Development

Project Drainage Report

HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006

Section 500 Rainfall Table of Contents

DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual

Overland Flow Time of Concentration on Very Flat Terrains

Rainfall - runoff: Unit Hydrograph. Manuel Gómez Valentín E.T.S. Ing. Caminos, Canales y Puertos de Barcelona

APPENDIX A: STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

Gwinnett County Stormwater System Assessment Program

Norman Maclean Snowmelt Flow rate Storm flows fs (c flow m a tre S

ND Detention Project Development Update

Water Quality Design Storms for Stormwater Hydrodynamic Separators

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

City of Oakland. Public Works Agency Standards STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES. Engineering Design & ROW Management Division

Updated Rainfall Coefficients for Texas The EBDLKUP-NEW.XLS Tool

Software Applications for Runoff Hydrological Assessment

SWMM5 LID Control for Green Infrastructure Modeling

Comparison of Predicted and Observed Flood Flows in Pajarito Canyon Following the 2000 Cerro Grande Fire

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

Chapter 3 Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Emerging Planning Approaches and Control Technologies

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

2. The Integration of Water Quality and Drainage Design Objectives

LID & Detention Pond Sizing Tool to Address Hydromodification and Water Quality in Clackamas County

DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL

Suspended Sediment Discharges in Streams

2011 LID Symposium. Estimating Annual Runoff Based on the NRCS Runoff Curve Number. Loews Philadelphia Hotel Philadelphia, PA September 25-28, 2011

Trends in Illinois River Streamflow and Flooding

Hydrologic Impacts of Exceeding Zoning Ordinances. on Impervious Lot Coverage: TR-55 modeling of three. Zoning Districts in Shippensburg Borough

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

History of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg

Hydrology for Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. September 2013

Runoff and soil loss. (Quantification and modeling of watershed discharge and sediment yield) Kassa Tadele (Dr.Ing) Arba Minch University

Hydrologic Model of the Vermilion River Watershed for Streamflow Simulations

Continuous Simulation Modeling of Stormwater Ponds, Lakes, & Wetlands: A BUILT-IN APPLICATION OF PONDS 3.2

ATTACHMENT C Design Analysis for Erosion Protection Cover for Piñon Ridge Tailing Cells

San Diego Hydrology Model (SDHM 3.0) Reviewer Workshop. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

The Islamic University of Gaza- Civil Engineering Department Sanitary Engineering- ECIV 4325 L5. Storm water Management

La Riereta Catchment Sant Boi de Llobregat

Stormwater Drainage Manual 2008

ABSTRACT MODELING WATER QUANTITY AND WATER QUALITY. Thesis directed by: Associate Professor Glenn E. Moglen

GIS Applications in Water Resources Engineering

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

Larry Hogan, Governor

ABSTRACT UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF THE MUSKINGUM-CUNGE CHANNEL ROUTING MODEL. Stephen Scott Reid, Master of Science, 2008

DRAINAGE & DESIGN OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM

Sizing Criteria Worksheets and Examples

CEE3430 Engineering Hydrology

Storm Drain Tritium Discharges RETS/REMP Workshop Roger Tolbert Grand Gulf Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.

UNIT HYDROGRAPH AND EFFECTIVE RAINFALL S INFLUENCE OVER THE STORM RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH

CITY OF ROLLA STORMWATER DESIGN STANDARDS

MODELING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS YIELDS USING THE HSPF MODEL IN THE DEEP HOLLOW WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Section 3 Stormwater Management Principles, Goals, and a Management Model

DIVISION V SECTION 5600 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS & FACILITIES

CHAPTER 3 HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS 3.1 SCOPE 3.2 COMPUTATION METHODS FOR RUNOFF

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report Mountaineer Plant Bottom Ash Pond Complex New Haven, West Virginia

SITE DESIGN ENGINEERING, LLC. 11 Cushman Street, Middleboro, MA P: F:

Runoff Volume: The Importance of Land Cover

Flood hazard assessment in the Raval District of Barcelona using a 1D/2D coupled model

Introduction. Welcome to the Belgium Study Abroad Program. Courses:

Detention Pond Design and Analysis. CE 378 Water Resources Engineering. Contents

Bay Area Hydrology Model

2

URBAN FLOODING: HEC-HMS

Transcription:

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area Bruce McEnroe, Bryan Young, Ricardo Gamarra and Ryan Pohl Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering University of Kansas

2 Research Sponsors Kansas City Metro Chapter, American Public Works Association Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Kansas Department of Transportation City of Overland Park

Hydrologic Methods in KC-APWA Section 5600 3 1. Rational Method: Q = C i A (for watersheds 200 acres) Q = discharge with specified AEP C = runoff coefficient for specified AEP i = rainfall intensity for specified AEP and duration equal to watershed s time of concentration (T C ) A = drainage area Needs Best available rainfall frequency estimates Calibrated relationship for estimating T C Calibrated C values for urban green space and undeveloped land

Hydrologic Methods in KC-APWA Section 5600 4 2. Flood hydrograph simulation by NRCS methods Rainfall: 24-hour NRCS Type II storm Runoff: NRCS curve-number method Streamflow hydrograph: NRCS synthetic unit hydrograph method Inputs 24-hour rainfall depth for specified AEP Basin lag time (T L ) Runoff curve number (CN) for specified AEP Drainage area Needs Best available rainfall frequency estimates Calibrated relationship for estimating T L Calibrated CN values for urban green space and undeveloped land

Rainfall Frequency 5 Rainfall frequency information in Section 5600 is derived from: NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDRO-35 (1977) for durations 60 minutes U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper 40 (1961) for durations > 60 minutes NOAA published new rainfall frequency estimates for Kansas and Missouri in 2014: in NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8 on NWS Precipitation Frequency Data Server

Specify Location

Rainfall estimates for certain durations and AEPs

Rainfall estimates for certain durations and ARIs

100-year, 24-hour rainfall OLD: TP-40

100-year, 24-hour rainfall NEW: Atlas 14

100-year, 24-hour rainfall for Kansas City area NEW: Atlas 14

Comparison of Old and New Estimates of 100-Year Rainfall Depths Lee s Summit (NE Scruggs Road & Blackwell Road)

Problems Rainfall frequency information in Section 5600 is outdated. Atlas 14 estimates: few durations; excessive spatial variation Solution New Atlas 14-based rainfall depth and intensity tables and equations by county: Buchanan, Cass, Clay, Jackson, Johnson, Leavenworth, Miami, Platte, Ray & Wyandotte

16 Lag Time and Time of Concentration Objective Reliable T L and T C relationships for KC-area urban watersheds Must account for channel condition (enclosed/paved vs. natural) Approach Determine lag times for KC-area urban watersheds from ALERT data Develop equation for T L the accounts for relevant watershed characteristics Calibrate T L equation with KC-area data T C = 5/3 T L

17 30 gaged watersheds Sizes: 113 ac to 11 mi 2 Lag times: 6 min to 2 hr

18 Relevant watershed characteristics A = drainage area L = length of longest flow path S = average slope of longest flow path R c = channel development ratio (% enclosed or paved) R i = impervious area ratio (impervious area / total area) W = A/L = average width of watershed

Calibrated lag-time equation for urban watersheds in KC area 19

Predicted T L (min) 1000 20 100 10 1 1 10 100 1000 Observed T L (min) New equation Old equation 1:1 Line

21 Rational Method in Section 5600 Q = K C i A where C = 0.3 + 0.6 R i R i = impervious fraction C = area-weighted average of 0.3 for pervious surfaces and 0.9 for impervious surfaces. K factor effectively increases composite C for AEP < 10%

22 Objective Calibrate frequency-dependent C value (K C in Section 5600) for KC-area pervious surfaces (urban green space and undeveloped land) Approach Regional flood-frequency analysis of 28 USGS-gaged watersheds in KC area Calibrated C to match discharge estimates from regional regression equations Used NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall estimates

K C for undeveloped land in the KC area 23

Q (cfs) Calibration of K C for AEP = 10% 24 100000 10000 K C = 0.48 (least-squares fit) 1000 K C = 0.30 (Section 5600) 100 100 1000 10000 100000 i A (acre-inch per hour)

25 Recommended changes to rational method in Section 5600 Omit K factor from rational equation For impervious surfaces, retain C = 0.9 For pervious surfaces, use these frequency-dependent C values: AEP 50% 20% 10% 4% 2% 1% C 0.30 0.42 0.48 0.55 0.59 0.63

26 Runoff Curve Numbers in Section 5600 Section 5600 specifies a CN value of 74 for all pervious surfaces in KC area. Objective Calibrate frequency-dependent CN values for pervious surfaces in KC area Approach Regional flood-frequency analysis of 28 USGS-gaged watersheds in KC area Calibrated CN to match discharge estimates from regional regression equations Used NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall estimates of 24-hour rainfall in NRCS Type II storm

27 Average CN values for undeveloped land in KC area, calibrated for peak flow: AEP 50% 20% 10% 4% 2% 1% CN 71 72 71 69 68 67 These values are lower than expected. Why?

28 Recommended changes to CN values in Section 5600 None. The specified CN value of 74 for pervious surfaces appears to be appropriately conservative for all frequencies.

29 Summary of Recommendations Adopt new county rainfall tables based on NOAA Atlas 14 Adopt new calibrated equations for lag time and time of concentration Adopt calibrated frequency-dependent rational C values for pervious surfaces No change to specified CN values