BIOGAS PRODUCTION POTENTIAL FROM AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS AND ORGANIC RESIDUES IN LATVIA

Similar documents
BIOGAS PRODUCTION POTENTIAL FROM AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES IN LATVIA

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 22 Lecture 8

INCREASE OF BIOGAS YIELD THROUGH ULTRASOUND

INCREASE OF BIOGAS YIELD THROUGH ULTRASOUND

Influence of nutrient composition on methane production from animal manures and co-digestion with maize and glycerine

Cereals straw and agricultural residues for energy production in Latvia

Ultrasonic Technology for Accurate Flow Measurement of Biogas

What type of Digester Configurations should be employed to produce Biomethane from Grass Silage?

Biogas Production from Vegetable Waste by using Dog and Cattle Manure

Comparative Study of Biogas Generation from Chicken Waste, Cow Dung and Pig Waste Using Constructed Plastic Bio Digesters

Your Pump Solution for the Biogas Industry.

Study of Biodegradability of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solids Waste

First Let s Define some Terms the most important terms used with these concepts are:

Economic Feasibility of Anaerobic Digesters

Organica is a registered trademark of the Keter Group Energy Division.

ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF BIOLOGICALLY PRETREATED SAWDUST FOR ENERGY APPLICATIONS.

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

International Business Development for Biogas

International Development in Biogas Utilization

DISTRICT HEATING & HEAT NETWORKS PRESENTATION

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM SOLID WASTE RESEARCH PROGRAM Student Project Report

PRODUCTION OF BIOGAS THROUGH ANAEROBIC CO- FERMENTATION OF CATTLE SLURRY WITH BISCUIT WASTE

Biogas recovery from anaerobic digestion process of mixed fruit -vegetable wastes

State-of-the-art Anaerobic digestion of solid waste

Analysis of Bioenergy Potential of Agriculture

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF DIGESTATE

3rd study tour. Bioenergy Region Straubing-Bogen, Germany. 31. Aug and 01. Sep 2010

Assessment of the Effect of Mixing Pig and Cow Dung on Biogas Yield

Company Presentation. Weber Entec GmbH & Co.KG. Jakarta

Grass/Cattle Manure as feedstock for AD plants

Technology (KNUST), Private Mail Bag, Kumasi, Ghana.

Waste to Energy & Anaerobic Digestion APCE Sept 16, 2014

New Ways to Energy. Energy Production of Renewable Resources and Bio-Waste in Biogas Plants. Hese Biogas GmbH Hese Biogas GmbH

GHG EMISSIONS FROM THE USAGE OF ENERGY CROPS FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION

Mono-fermentation of Energy Crops - Experience from the Biogas Plant in Obernjesa

7624 Riverview Road Cleveland, Ohio

Studies on the Effect of Urine on Biogas Production

Biogas Energy Potential in Alberta

What is Biomass? Biomass plants animal waste photosynthesis sunlight energy chemical energy Animals store

Influence of Inoculum Content on Performance of Anaerobic Reactors for Treating Cattle Manure using Rumen Fluid Inoculum

ECONOMIZER SE patented solution for hydrolysing woody cellulose-rich biomass

ENERGY PRODUCTION FROM BIOMASS

Biogas energy produced with

Biogas & Tierhygiene. Improvement of Efficiency of Biogas Plants Hygienic Stock Breeding

INCREASE OF BIOGAS YIELD THROUGH ULTRASOUND DENMARK APRIL 2017

A Biogas Decision Support System Tool

G R E E N H O U S E G A S M I T I G A T I O N A G R I C U L T U R E A N D F O R E S T R Y S E C T O R S

Biomass and the RPS. Anthony Eggert Commissioner. California Energy Commission

2016 legislative proposal for the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive - Biomethane -

A tognum Group Brand COMBINED HEAT AND POWER FROM BIOGAS

The Biology of Composting

Biogas Cuts Climate Pollution

Anaerobic codigestion of sewage sludge and rice straw

Jenbacher gas engines

6. Good Practice Example: Biogas in Germany

Vermont Tech Community Anaerobic Digester! Harvesting renewable energy & recycling nutrients for a more sustainable community

Operational Results of an Agricultural Biogas Plant Equipped with Modern Instrumentation and Automation. J. Wiese and O. Kujawski

The Effect of Natural Water with Cow Dung and Agricultural Waste Ratio on Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion

INCREASE OF BIOGAS YIELD THROUGH ULTRASOUND

Training on Biogas and Biomethane Production

Sustainable Biogas Market Central and Eastern Europe

Laboratory Construction for Biogas Production from Plants

Bio-Methane Regions Template Best Practice Case Studies (WP 5.1)

ENERGY PARAMETERS AND FEEDSTOCK MANAGEMENT IN FARM-SCALE BIOGAS PLANTS: SURVEY IN THE NORTH-EAST OF ITALY

Composting Systems & Methods

Biogas plants made by EISENMANN

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Environmental Sciences 35 (2016 )

Agricultural Biomass Availability for Bioenergy Applications in Nova Scotia. Michael Main NSAC May 22, 2008

Sustainable Ethanol Production from Cellulosic and Starchy Raw Materials. Energy- and Ecobalances

CHAPTER 2 BIOMASS SOURCES

HYBRID SOLAR BIOGAS PILOT PLANT

Performing operations and calculations involving dates requires that one acquires familiarity with some of Excel s Date and Time Functions.

What is Bioenergy? William Robinson B9 Solutions Limited

1. Introduction 2. Co-substrates and biogas yields 3. Basic principle of anaerobic digestion 4. Biogas plants for organic substrates 5.

Areas of Activities within IUE. Energy system analysis. Renewable energies. Anaerob systems. Ökotoxicology. Metall recycling. Environmental technology

INFLUENCE OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE SRT ON ANAEROBIC EXCESS SLUDGE DIGESTION

Biofuel Generation from Grass

Biogas Technology. INNOVAS (Munich) Proactive Energy Management. in the field of Biogas & Biomass Technology a cooperation with

BIOGAS SPECIFIC HEAT CAPACITY VARIATIONS DURING UPGRADING

Waste Management for Food & Agriculture Industry Cleaner Production for Food industries

Grass-to-biogas Cases in Germany

Small Scale Digester Case Study: Peters/USEMCO Anaerobic Digester

Potential of farm scale biogas to grid in Ireland

GROUND KAFIR AS A FEED FOR DAIRY COWS¹

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Review of composting and anaerobic digestion of MSW & a methodological proposal for a mid-size city

Sustainable small-scale biogas production from agrofood waste for energy self-sufficiency

Small-Scale Solar-Biopower Generation For Rural Central America

Industrial Biotechnology and Biorefining

Sustainable small-scale biogas production from agrofood waste for energy self-sufficiency. Live-Webinar, 12th November 2014

PRODUCTION OF BIOGAS FROM VARIOUS BIOMASS WASTE A.Vijin Prabhu 1 *, S. Antony Raja 1, C. Lindon Robert Lee 1, P. Jeba 2

Driven by pure energy. Understanding the Important Factors of Anaerobic Digestion ABC Workshop - May 27,

Farm Digesters and Digestion 101 by Mark Moser

Possibilities for biogas in electricity grid balancing

Profitability of small manure plants

Chriwa Group page 2-7 Working fields page 8-10 Excursion Germany page South Africa page Waste-to-Energy. page Summary.

BIOGAS TECHNOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE BIOENERGY PRODUCTION IEA TASK 37 Seminar, 28 April 2009, Jyväskylä. Biogas in Finland

Content. National Renewable Action Plan & Biogas Market in Germany. NREAP Germany. National RE Action Plan (NREAP) Germany

Introduction to Biogas Technology

Transcription:

BIOGAS PRODUCTION POTENTIAL FROM AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS AND ORGANIC RESIDUES IN LATVIA Vilis Dubrovskis, Vladimirs Kotelenecs, Eduards Zabarovskis, Arvids Celms, Imants Plume Latvia University of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Energetics vilisd@inbox.lv Abstract The biogas and energy potential from different biomasses is needed to be evaluated, including manure, wastewater sludge, energy plants, and food und biofuel processing wastes in Latvia. Energy crops growing on unused agricultural area are the most important biomass feedstock and its share is around 88% of whole biogas potential in Latvia. Biogas output from different biomass was investigated in laboratory scale digesters operated at 38 o C. Biomass mixed with inoculums (fermented cow manure) was investigated for biogas production in sixteen digesters, operated in batch mode at temperature 38±1.0 C. The average methane yield from old grass silage was 248 l kg DOMadd -1 and the average methane content was 48.9%. The average methane yield from chopped oats was 303 l kg DOMadd -1 and the average methane content was 63.1%. The average methane yield from dry fraction of pigs manure was 342 l kg DOMadd -1 and the average methane content was 54.53%. All the investigated biomasses can be successfully cultivated for energy production in Latvia. Key words: agricultural wastes, anaerobic digestion, biogas, energy crops, methane. Introduction In accordance with the National Renewable Energy Action Plan, in 2020 the biogas energy potential should reach 92MW (Support programmes for.., 2012). For the success, it is important to clarify the potential of biogas production from various raw materials, using available and cheaper raw materials first. The Bioenergy Laboratory of Latvia University of Agriculture continues investigation of the potential of biogas production from various raw materials (Biogas Production and.., 2011), and three investigations are shown in this research paper. 1. Old grass silage Materials, methods and investigation process The substrates from each type of raw materials and inoculums were analyzed for dry matter, organic matter, ash content and chemical composition. The investigation was measured by using standardized methods (Methodenhandbuch Energetische biomassenutzung.., 2010) (VDI 4630). The raw materials and inoculums were carefully weighed and thoroughly mixed. For all substrates, the same inoculums were used digestate from a continuous digester. All digesters were connected to the gas storage facilities and taps; the digesters were operating in continuous mode at temperature from 38 to 38.5 o C. Data of gas volume and composition were registered every day. The digesters were agitated every day to reduce the floating layer. The process of fermentation was measured in a single loading mode until the biogas stopped evolving. Also the digestate was weighed and the ph value, dry matter, ash content and organic matter composition were determined. The raw material used for the investigation was old grass silage that was kept in a trench for more than a year. The scientists (Anaerobic Digestion of.., 2011) and workers stressed that the digesters should be filled in with the silage of good quality like the cows should be fed with it. However, for various reasons, the quality of silage was not suitable for cattle feeding. Therefore, it was important to investigate the yield of biogas that could be obtained from the last year s grass silage. 0.7 l digesters were filled in with 20 g of old grass silage and 0.5 l of inoculums (the accuracy of the measurements was ±0.2 g). All data were entered into the research journal and computer. Facilities The dry matter was determined by the Shimazu facility at temperature 120 o C, the organic matter was determined by the Nabertherm drying oven at temperature 550 o C. As digesters, standard 0.75l vessels were used. The exsiccator Memmert obtained a stable temperature. All-purpose (Universal) exsiccator Memmert (two items) (temperature to 100 o C, volume 300 l). The composition of gas was determined by the gas analyzer GA 2000. The concentration of methane, oxygen, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide in the biogas, pressure and normal calculated volume of gas were measured. The weighing scales (Kern 16KO2 FKB) were used to determine weights of raw materials and digestate; the ph stationary meter (PP-50) was used to determine the ph value. 115

Results The results are shown in Table 1. The table results show that silage has low contents of dry matter (17.27%) and organic matter. The optimum contents of dry matter and organic matter for this type of silage is about 30% and 85-93%, respectively. The results of digestate investigation are shown in Table 2. Results of raw materials investigation Table 1 Raw material/digester ph substr. TS % TS g T % DOM % DOM g Weight g Total DOM g Silage GPS R5 7.01 17.27 3.45 27.0 73.0 2.52 520 18.18 Silage GPS R6 7.01 17.27 3.45 27.0 73.0 2.52 520 18.18 Silage GPS R7 7.01 17.27 3.45 27.0 73.0 2.52 520 18.18 Silage GPS R8 7.01 17.27 3.45 27.0 73.0 2.52 520 18.18 Inoculum 7.78 3.77 18.85 16.94 83.06 15.66 500 15.66 Results of digestate investigation Table 2 Raw material/digester ph TS % TS g T % DOM % DOM g Weight g R5 7.39 3.46 17,4 20.71 79.29 13.79 502.80 R6 7.33 4.02 20,6 17.68 82.32 16.96 512.40 R7 7.2 3.85 19,47 21.43 78.57 15.3 505.80 R8 7.2 3.99 20,05 19.52 80.48 16.14 502.60 Inoculum 7.14 3.39 16,81 21.86 78.14 13.13 495.9 Biogas and methane yield Table 3 Raw material Biogas, l Biogas, l/g DOM Methane max % Methane l without inoculum Methane l/g DOM filled in Silage R5 1.5 0.294 48.3 0.494 0.196 Silage R6 1.32 0.222 41.0 0.177 0.07 tp Silage R7 2.13 0.544 48.9 0.626 0.248 SilageR8 2.3 0.611 49.0 0.755 0.299 Inoculum 0.76 0.048 31.3 0.168 0.011 Average 1.977 0.483 0.625 0.248 Notes Figure 1. Biogas and methane yield obtained from old grass silage, l 116

The yield of methane and biogas is shown in Table 3 and figures. Results of R6 digester are not reliable and significant due to the technical problems (unregistered gas leak). The average methane yield obtained from old grass silage is 0.248-0,052 +0,051 l/gdom. Since the old grass silage quality was bad, it was still possible to obtain a significant amount of methane. 2. Biogas obtaining potential from chopped oats Materials, methods and investigation process The oat bran was used as raw material. The bran was carefully shredded and its size did not exceed 1 mm. The process of investigation and facilities are described in the previous investigation. Results The results of raw material investigation are shown in Table 4. The results of digestate investigation are shown in Table 5. The yield of methane and biogas is shown in Table 6 and figures. The average methane yield obtained from chopped oats is 0.303-0.073 +0.062 l/g DOM. Figure 2. Biogas and methane l/g DOM obtained from old grass silage Results of raw material investigation Table 4 Raw material/digester phsubstr. TS % TS g T % DOM % DOM g Weight g Total DOM g Chopped oats R9 7.73 86.6 17.32 4.78 95.22 16.49 520 32.15 Chopped oats R10 7.73 86.6 17.32 4.78 95.22 16.49 520 32.15 Chopped oats R11 7.73 86.6 17.32 4.78 95.22 16.49 520 32.15 Chopped oats R12 7.73 86.6 17.32 4.78 95.22 16.49 520 32.15 Inoculum 7.78 3.77 18.85 16.94 83.06 15.66 500 15.66 Results of digestate investigation Table 5 Raw material/digester ph TS% TSg T% DOM% DOMg Weight g R9 7.11 4.41 22.27 16.56 83.44 18.59 505.1 R10 7.11 4.64 23.09 18.19 81.81 18.89 497.8 R11 7.07 4.82 24.22 16.02 83.98 20.34 502.4 R12 7.1 5.16 25.77 15.96 84.04 21.66 499.4 Inoculum 7.14 3.39 16.64 21.86 78.14 13.0 490.9 117

3. Biogas obtaining potential from the dry fraction of pigs manure Materials, methods and investigation process The dry fraction of pigs manure was used as raw material. This fraction was obtained using the FAN Press Screw Separator. The process of investigation is described in the first investigation. Results The results of raw materials investigation are shown in Table 7. The results of digestate investigation are shown in Table 8. The yield of biogas and methane is shown in Table 9 and figures. The average methane yield obtained from the dry fraction of pigs manure is 0.342-0.189 +0.146 l/g DOM. Biogas and methane yield Table 6 Raw material Biogas l Biogas l/g DOM Methane max % Methane l without inoculums Methane l/g DOM filled in Chopped oats R9 6.95 0.378 62.4 3.771 0.230 Chopped oats R10 12.0 0.686 62.1 5.970 0.365 Chopped oats R11 7.87 0.433 62.3 4.315 0.263 Chopped oats R12 12.15 0.695 65.6 5.788 0.353 Inoculum 0.76 0.048 31.3 0.168 0.011 Average 9.743 0.548 4.961 0.303 Figure 3. Biogas and methane yield obtained from chopped oats, l Figure 4. Biogas and methane yield l/g DOM obtained from chopped oats 118

Results of raw materials investigation Table 7 Raw material/digester ph substr. TS % TS g T % DOM % DOM g Weight g Total DOM g Pig manure R13 7.74 21.16 4.23 8.79 91.21 3.86 520 19.52 Pig manure R14 7.74 21.16 4.23 8.79 91.21 3.86 520 19.52 Pig manure R15 7.74 21.16 4.23 8.79 91.21 3.86 520 19.52 Pig manure R16 7.74 21.16 4.23 8.79 91.21 3.86 520 19.52 Inoculum 7.78 3.77 18.85 16.94 83.06 15.66 500 15.66 Results of digestate investigation Table 8 Raw material/digester ph TS% TS g T% DOM% DOMg Weight g R13 7.08 3.58 18.32 20.23 79.77 14.62 511.80 R14 7.12 3.57 18.38 21.87 78.13 14.36 515.00 R15 7.06 3.84 19.78 17.55 82.45 16.3 515.00 R16 7.08 3.57 18.34 18.45 81.55 14.96 513.80 Inoculum 7.14 3.39 16.64 21.86 78.14 13.0 490.9 Biogas and methane yield Table 9 Raw material Biogas l Biogas l/g DOM Methane max % Methane l without inoculums Methane l/g DOM filled in Pig manure R13 2.95 0.567 56.8 1.369 0.354 Pig manure R14 4.05 0.852 57.2 1.883 0.488 Pig manure R15 2.33 0.407 49.6 0.706 0.183 Pig manure R16 2.87 0.545 56.0 0.442 0.342 Inoculum 0.76 0.048 31.3 0.168 0.011 Average 0.609 1.319 0.342 Figure 5. Biogas and methane yield obtained from the dry fraction of pigs manure, l 119

Figure 6. Biogas and methane yield l/g DOM obtained from the dry fraction of pigs manure Conclusions The investigation shows that good quality silage should be used for biogas production. If silage quality (silage of lower quality) is not suitable for cattle feeding, it could be used for biogas production, however, the amount of yield will be less than with good quality silage. Chopped oat bran is a good raw material for biogas production. The methane yield of 0.303 l/ g DOM is a significant result in comparison with a theoretical optimum. The methane yield 0.342 l/g DOM obtained from the dry fraction of pigs manure is a good result. This result outperforms the average methane yield from normal pig manure. It is worth to transport the dry fraction of pigs manure to long distances. References 1. Methodenhandbuch Energetische biomassenutzung DBFZ version 1.1 2010. P 93. 2. 2.Vilis Dubrovskis, Imants Plume, Vladimirs Koteļeņecs, Eduards Zabarovskis. Biogas Production and Biogas Potential from Agricultural Biomass and Organic Residues in Latvia. Progress in Biogas 2 --proceedings of international Congress part 2. 30.03-1.04 2011. Hohenheim. Pp 80-83. 3. Saskia Oldenburg, Luise Westphal, Ina Korner. Anaerobic Digestion of Grass Biomass. Progress in Biogas 2 --proceedings of international Congress 30.03-1.04 2011. Hohenheim. Pp 101-105. 4. Ministry of Economics of Republic of Latvia. Support programmes for Energetics. Available: http:// www.em.gov.lv/em/2nd/?cat=30261&lng=lv/, 4 April 2012. Acknowledgement This publication is prepared within the framework of the ESF Project Attraction of human resources to the research of the renewable energy sources, Contract No. 2009/0225/1DP/1.1.1.2.0/09/APIA/VIAA/ 129. 120