Reducing Lost and Unaccounted for Natural Gas in Distribution Systems

Similar documents
Reducing Lost and Unaccounted for Natural Gas in Distribution Systems

NRRI Colloquium July 11, 2015 Answering Questions about Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Sector

Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program: Supplementary Technical Information for ONE Future Commitment Option

Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Life Cycle and Implications for Power Generation: Update on Emission Studies

Environmental, Economic, and Technological Effects of Methane Emissions and Abatement

U.S. Emissions

A PENNSYLVANIA FRAMEWORK OF ACTIONS FOR METHANE REDUCTIONS FROM THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR

Transmission Pipeline Opportunities. Advancing Project Development in India through Public Private Partnerships

MATERIAL SUBJECT #5: ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 2012 Data Summary

Synthesis of recent ground-level methane emission measurements from the U.S. natural gas supply chain

Pipeline safety regulations apply to all pipelines that transport either flammable gas or hazardous liquids where the product affects interstate

Description [in natural gas volume] Emissions estimated from size of breach / pressure / duration calculation

2015 NAPSR Central Region Meeting State of the State Report: Michigan

192GasCatalog.

Minnesota Natural Gas Distribution Profile

The PennEast Pipeline Project

An Overview of Offsets from Mine Methane Capture and their Role in California Cap-and-Trade. June 19, 2014

BLM Forum on Venting and Flaring of Gas Produced from Onshore Federal Lands. Statement of Tomás Carbonell

40 CFR 98 Subpart W Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

RECEIVED II1C. Comments of PECO Energy Company on the Commission's Proposed Rulemaking Order; Docket No. L

Industrial Services. Minimizing Downtime. Maximizing Performance. LDAR. Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Services

The PennEast Pipeline Project

ebook: USING ULTRASOUND TO ENHANCE ENERGY EFFICIENCY

New Jersey Natural Gas Market Update

Program Features: Pennsylvania s Low-Income Usage Reduction Program (LIURP)

FLARING AND VENTING DEFINITIONS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER I SOCALGAS AMI VISION AND POLICY

2016 VMA Technical Seminar Fugitive emission testing and certification of valves What we will have to do next? David Bayreuther March 10, 2016

Absolute Scope 1 Emissions (Direct) Total Volatile Organic Compound Emissions (Absolute) Total Energy (Indexed to Net Sales)

Pennsylvania s Climate Change Action Plan Solid Waste Advisory Committee

Oil and Gas Drilling Linked to Air Pollution. Fracking Provides Many Opportunities For The Release Of Air Pollutants.

Natural Gas Infrastructure in New York

Life-Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Shale Gas Extraction in Scotland. Clare Bond, University of Aberdeen.

VALLEY LATERAL PROJECT. RESOURCE REPORT 11 Reliability and Safety. FERC Docket No. CP

Focus on Hydraulic Fracturing

Documenting Climate Change Considerations in the National Environmental Policy Act Process. Jeff Houk FHWA Resource Center June 7, 2010

Clermont Modernization Project. National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation Sept. 20, 2016

Corporate Commications Editorial Guid e

DOE Methane Emissions R&D CH4 Connections 2016 on Methane Emissions November 2, 2016

MOUNTAINEER XPRESS. Columbia Pipeline Group

NSPS OOOOa Fugitive Emissions Requirements

DRAFT Procedures for Quantifying Fugitive VOC Emission Sources at Petroleum Facilities

Overview of U.S. and European Climate Change Programs. Reid Harvey, U.S. EPA Presented at LSU Energy Summit October 24, 2007

Opportunities and Challenges in the Energy Infrastructure Industry. Louisiana State University Energy Summit

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EVALUATION REPORT ON THE ASHLEY FUNK PETITION FOR RULEMAKING TO REDUCE CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS

December 1, RE: Notification of Regulatory Review, Docket No. DOT-OST Dear Secretary Chao:

American Carbon Registry

Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the Canadian Oil and Natural Gas Industries

EPA Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule. Onshore Petroleum & Natural Gas Production

Progress Authority Natural Gas Utilization Value-Added Presentation. October 29, 2015 Presented by Anthony J. Ventello, Executive Director

How EPA s Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Quantifies the Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Organics Management

Downstream Natural Gas Initiative: EPA s Methane Challenge Program

Methane Emissions Reduction Initiative. Prepared by Alberta Energy for February 10, 2017

GREENHOUSE GAS LIFE-CYCLE EMISSIONS STUDY: Fuel Life-Cycle of U.S. Natural Gas Supplies and International LNG

Roadrunner Gas Transmission Pipeline. Frequently Asked Questions Summer 2015

Notice of Proposed Rule Making

EMISSIONS REGULATIONS AND REDUCTIONS TECHNOLOGY IN WESTERN CANADA S OIL & GAS SECTOR

The Climate Impact Of Natural Gas and Coal-Fired Electricity: A Review of Fuel Chain Emissions Based on Updated EPA National Inventory Data

Electricity and Petroleum Industries:

Methane Emission Factor Development Project for Select Sources in the Natural Gas Industry. Draft Task 1 Report

Part 192 Corrosion Enforcement Guidance

This Series of Guides Addresses:

Disclaimer. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not:

San Diego County Greenhouse Gas Inventory. An Analysis of Regional Emissions and Strategies to Achieve AB 32 Targets. Other Fuels Report

GOAL 5 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP

Pemex Gas and Basic Petrochemicals Division of Production

EPA Did Not Use Allegedly Flawed Studies to Estimate Methane Emissions or Set New Source Performance Standards for Oil and Natural Gas Production

Flow Meter Calibration

U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

DEVELOPMENT OF 2010 OIL AND GAS EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS FOR THE DENVER-JULESBURG BASIN

APPLICATION FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER INCENTIVES

GAS-TO-LIQUIDS - «GTL»

Cumulative Risks of Shale Gas Development

SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION OCTOBER Version 1.0. Prepared by:

Update on the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment

British Columbia s Carbon Tax Strengths and Opportunities

IV. Energy Use Strategies

About TransCanada. At TransCanada, our mission is to safely, responsibly and reliably transport energy used by millions of North Americans every day.

NATURAL GAS SAFETY WHAT TO DO IN AN EMERGENCY

EA July 11, 2017

Westar Energy powers lives with sustainable energy.

The Apogee Scientific. Technology

General Rate Case Application Information

BENCHMARKING & DISCLOSURE REPORT

SECTION 4 - DESIGN STANDARDS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

Estimating Potential Energy Savings in Compressed Air Systems

CEQA GHG Significance Determination. August 17, 2010 August 18, 2010 August 20, 2010

4 Responding to Climate Change Guiding Question: How can we respond to climate change?

An Employee-Owned Company

MEMORANDUM. The general findings of the assessment are as follows:

City of Pasadena Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Global Overview of Policies Affecting Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Recovery and Utilization

IPCC Guidance on Developing and Applying CCS Emission Estimation Methodologies in National Inventories of GHGs

EPRI Welcome and Introduction

AB 32 and Agriculture

JACKSON COUNTY WATER AND SEWERAGE AUTHORITY. Cross-Connection Control Program

2. Circulating Water System

Roadrunner Gas Transmission Pipeline. Project Overview

Explaining and Understanding Declines in U.S. CO 2 Emissions

Transcription:

Reducing Lost and Unaccounted for Natural Gas in Distribution Systems Summary: Reduce lost and unaccounted (L&U) for natural gas from natural gas distribution operations by 15% by the year 2020. The period of analysis is 2013 through 2020. Fugitive emissions reductions are assumed to be implemented linearly until the 15% target is reached in 2020. Introduction: The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) requires Nature Gas Distribution Companies (NGDC) to report their levels of unaccounted for gas regularly. However, there is little case law defining unaccounted for gas. The American Gas Association defines L&U as the difference between the total gas available from all sources, and the total gas accounted for as sales, net interchange, and company use. Unaccounted for natural gas is not defined in 66 Pa. C.S. 1307 or 52 Pa Code 53 or 59. In early June 2012, the PUC issued for comment proposed regulations that would create a uniform definition of unaccounted natural gas and level metrics for natural gas distribution system losses for Pennsylvania s NGDCs. Natural gas is released to the atmosphere through fugitive and vented emissions. Fugitive emissions are methane leaks often through pipeline and system components (such as compressor seals, pump seals and valve packing). Vented emissions are methane leaks from a variety of equipment and operational practices, such as well completion activities and are directly attributed to an organization s actions but also through accidental line breaks and thefts. Baseline Activities for 2009 (latest data): Natural Gas Consumers in Pennsylvania in 2009 11 2,873,948 Residential 2,635,869 (91.7%) Commercial 233,333 (8.12%) Industrial 4,746 (0.002%) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Consumption by End User in 2009 Residential 228 Bcf (30%) Commercial 144 Bcf (19%) Industrial 173 Bcf (23%) Electric Power Generation 211 Bcf (28%) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Production in 2009 Conventional Production 209.3 Bcf Marcellus Production 78.4 Bcf Total Production 287.8 Bcf Lost & Unaccounted for Natural Gas: NGDCs report L&U natural gas to the PUC. It is important to reduce natural gas losses for safety concerns. Reducing these losses also provides significant environmental benefit via the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nnatural gas (methane) is approximately 23 21 to 25 times more harmful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. 1 Gas Consumers and Gas Consumption information was provided through an U.S Energy Information System query 2010 Data 1

Table 1 indicates the last reported Distribution Utilities L&U natural gas was 18.7 billion cubic feet (Bcf). In the previous action plan the reported L&U was 19.6 Bcf. This is a decrease in L&U gas of approximately 4.6% while the number of natural gas consumers has increased by approximately 1.2% and the amount of natural gas consumption has increased approximately 19.5% since last reported in the previous action plan. However, the reported L&U values are not accurately estimating gas companies individual contributions to fugitive or vented emissions for the following reasons: 1) End-use consumer meters (likely to be residential sector meters) do not accurately measure delivered volumes. This is because some meters do not accurately account for temperature and pressure sensitivities. It is thought that consumer meters are approximately + or 3% in measurement accuracy. 2) Natural gas companies use a portion of their product in various stages of the transmission process (i.e. compressors), which is not separately quantified. 3) Gas theft may also be occurring, although it is assumed to be a relatively minor loss with regard to L&U reporting. 4) The PUC does not have standardized calculation/reporting procedures for L&U. In previous years, some utilities have actually report gains (delivered volumes in excess of what was reportedly placed into the system) instead of losses. This means that it is not possible to draw conclusions from the PUC s statewide L&U statistics. 5) The PUC indicates there are approximately 6,000 line breaks per year due to accidents (i.e. diggingup a line during construction). Methane releases from these individual accidents have not been quantified. Therefore, there are three primary areas that need to be addressed to improve our understanding L&U natural gas: Accurate measurement and reporting. Operations and maintenance improvements (or replacements) to lines and aging parts and Minimization of accidental losses through line breaks. Potential GHG Reductions and Economic Costs: Table 1. Estimated GHG Reductions and Cost-effectiveness GHG emission savings (2020) 0.001 MMtCO 2 e Net present value (2013 2020) N/Q $million Cumulative emissions reductions (2013 2020) 0.102 MMtCO 2 e Cost-effectiveness (2013 2020) N/Q $/tco 2 e GHG = greenhouse gas; MMtCO 2 e = million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; $/tco 2 e = dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent. Negative numbers indicate costs savings. Comment [JS1]: Does this value reflect the last bullet in the implementation steps for 8.5 miles of pipeline replacement and the replacement of all temperature and pressure compensating meters? 2

Table 2: Lost & Unaccounted-for Natural Gas for Major Gas Distribution Companies + Distribution Company Total Lost & Unaccounted-for (Mcf) Total Deliveries (Mcf) Percent L & U Data Year Columbia 66,646 117,680,838 0.06% 2010 Dominion-Peoples 5,764,495 90,143,516 6.39% 2008 Equitable 2,428,560 60,568,085 4.01% 2010 National Fuel 939,364 50,456,478 1.86% 2010 PECO Gas 2,480,886 91,030,465 2.73% 2010 UGI - Penn 291,315 65,334,580 0.45% 2010 Phila. Gas Works 4,969,805 89,222,623 5.57% 2010 PPL Gas 1,531,629 27,831,130 5.50% 2007 UGI - Gas 279,301 124,401,133 0.22% 2010 Totals 18,752,001 716,668,848 2.62% + There are no PUC standards for reporting lost and unaccounted for natural gas Table 2 provides data on the amount of cast iron and unprotected steel pipe in each distribution company s territory. These two types of pipe have the highest fugitive loss rates. Much of the pipeline replacements that are occurring use plastic coated steel or similar material that is less permeable and provides a measure of increased safety and increased longevity. Each of the distribution companies has a plan in place with the PUC for ongoing replacement of aging distribution pipelines. Table 3: Pennsylvania Distribution Sector Report on Cast Iron and Unprotected Steel 2 Distribution Company Miles of Cast Iron Miles of Unprotected Bare Steel Total Miles Distribution % of Statewide Total Cast Iron % of Statewide Total Unprotected Bare Steel Columbia Gas of PA 74 2127 7,260 2.3% 25.0% Dominion Peoples 66 1,908 6,566 2.0% 22.4% Equitable Gas 47 705 3,307 1.4% 8.3% National Fuel Gas 93 1,051 4,916 2.8% 12.3% PECO 836 369 6,614 25.5% 4.3% UGI Penn Natural 82 305 2,562 2.5% 3.6% Phila. Gas Works 1,624-3,019 49.5% 0.0% PPL Gas 28 661 3,619 0.9% 7.8% T.W. Phillips - 1,095 2,955 0.0% 12.9% UGI 428 300 5,012 13.1% 3.5% 2 Developed by the PUC using U.S. Department of Transportation Data 3

Figure 1: 2009 U.S. Distribution Sector Methane Emissions (72 Bcf) 3 Table 4: 15Percent of Pennsylvania L&U 2009 Distribution Sector Emissions (18.7 Bcf) NG % loss Loss (MCF) Implementation Cost ($ Million) Recovered (Mcf) NG Saved ($ Million) CO2e (MMT) Cost $/t CO2e Meters 8% 224,400 $5.180 29,806 $0.146 0.008 $629 Cast and Unprotected Steel 33% 925,650 $58.906 122,948 $0.603 0.034 $1,943 other 18% 504,900 n/a 67,063 $0.324 0.019 N/Q Metering and Regulating Stations 40% 1,122,000 n/a 149,028 $0.731 0.041 N/Q TOTAL 99% 2,776,950 $64.086 368,845 $1,804 0.102 Economic Cost: According to the EPA, fugitive emissions from commercial/industrial and residential customer meter sets account for 8 percent% of the national total for natural national gas industry methane emissions.* The average leak rate per residential meter set is only 0.01 scf/hr (0.0003 m3/hr), but there are approximately 40 million customer meters located outdoors,. 2.6 million of which, according to the PUC, are located in PA. These emissions are related to fugitive methane losses from the meter and associated sets include the meter itself and the related pipe and fittings. Methane emissions from commercial and residential customer meter sets are caused by fugitive losses from the connections and other fittings surrounding the meter set. To contribute to the 15 percent% reduction in L&U natural gas by the year 2020, PA distribution companies would need to replace 51.8 thousand meters sets by 2020. Thise amount of meter set replacements wcould result in more than just over 8,000 metric tons of methane emission reductions. 3 U.S. EPA, 2011: November 2011, Natural Gas Star Program Accomplishments * Based on Figure 1I abbove 4

According to the EPA, distribution sector emissions are driven primarily by underground pipeline leaks and Mmetering and Ppressure Rregulating Sstations (M&PR stations), as identified in Table 4. Fugitive methane emissions from underground pipe lines (cast iron and unprotected steel) account for 33% ofpercent of the national total from the natural national gas industry methane emissions. The PUC states that about 12,000 miles of aging gas mains need replacing (3,278 miles of cast iron, 8,907 miles of unprotected bare steel-see table above). The estimated cost of replacing gas mains is approximately $1 million/mile. To achieve a 15 percent% reduction in L&U natural gas from 2013 through 2020, 58 miles of gas mains would should need to be replaced, resulting in nearly 36,000 metric tons of CO 2 e emission reductions. Assuming a linear relationship between lost gas and the rate of pipeline replacement would yields a cost of approximately $12 billion.$58.9 million. It is also expected to take approximately 20 years, at normal levels of replacement, to complete these replacements. The replacement of the 58 miles of gas mains could result in just under 34,000 metric tons of methane emissions. The PUC believes there may be future federal government requirements to eliminate these older pipes. M&R stations in the distribution segment include both transmission-to-distribution custody transfer points and the downstream pressure reduction stations. The EPA estimates fugitive emissions from regulator stations and M&R stations account for 40 percent of the total annual national methane emissions*. The primary losses from M&R stations include both fugitive emissions and, in some cases, emissions from pneumatic devices. Some pressure regulating stations use gas-operated pneumatic devices to position the pressure regulators. These gas-operated pneumatic devices bleed to the atmosphere continuously and/or when the regulator is activated for some system designs. Other designs bleed the gas downstream into the lower pressure pipeline and, therefore, have no losses associated with the pneumatic devices. By redesigning bleed devices and addressing other sources of fugitive emission at M&R stations, methane emissions could drop by 15 percent by 2020. This could eliminate approximatelysome 430.7 thousand metric tons of methaneco 2 e emissions. Comment [JS2]: We should keep this kind of statement perhaps saying something like At historical rates of replacement, replacing 58 miles of pipeline would take approximately 20 years. We should then contrast that with a statement that indicates the new, more hastened rate of replacement being completed to improve the safety of gas distribution lines. According to the EPA Other Sources of methane emissions are responsible for 4% of the total national annual national methane emissions*. One of these sources of emissions areis blow and purge operations. Blow (or blow-down) gas refers to intentional and unintentional venting of gas for maintenance, routine operations, or emergency conditions. For Example; periodically natural gas is discharged to the atmosphere for one of two reasons: 1) maintenance blow-down-- the gas is vented from equipment to eliminate the flammable material inside the equipment providing a safer working environment for personnel that service or enter the equipment; or 2) emergency blow-down-- the gas is vented from a site to eliminate a potential fuel source, for example in case of fire. The factors that affect the volume of methane blow-down released to the atmosphere are frequency, volume of gas blow-down per event, and the disposition of the blow-down gas. By limiting the frequency and volume of blow and purge events and redirecting the gas downstream back into the line nearly 198 thousand metric tons of CO 2 e could be eliminated by 2020. Implementation Steps: Replacing all customer meter sets with temperature and pressure compensated meters may cost $100 per meter (PUC estimate). There are about 2.6 million households using natural gas (not including commercial and industrial consumers which may have temperature/pressure meters). This will result in improved metering with more accurate measuring of end-use calculation of for L&U and consumption along with reduced fugitive emissions from aging meters sets. NGDCs should be encouraged to participate in existing voluntary industry programs, such as EPA s Natural Gas STAR Program. Natural Gas STAR is focused on reducing methane emissions through technology transfer using best practices in operation and maintenance. Natural Gas STAR provides analytical tools and services to assist in calculating companies methane emissions. 5

Encourage utilities to regularly perform self-assessments and report (to the PUC) operation and maintenance practices that have resulted in environmental savings. Improved and standardized L&U reporting for all NGDCs doing business in Pennsylvania. This would require PUC staff to develop standardized accurate reporting methods. Note: In early June 2012 the PUC issued for comment proposed regulations that would create a uniform definition of UFG and level metrics for natural gas distribution system losses for the state s NGDCs. We must improve on reducing accidental line breaks in Pennsylvania. Despite the availability and use of Pennsylvania s One Call System to identify underground utilities before digging, there remain too many accidents. Accidents by home owners and contractors have occurred even after notification to the One Call System and identification of underground utility services has been made. Perhaps increased enforcement and penalties of the Pennsylvania One Call System could help reduce the number of accidents. This could require additional staff time to enforce, but may be offset by fines and penalties. Develop and implement a plan for the replacement of at least 8.5 miles per year of aging cast iron and unprotected steel pipe gas mains annually through 2020 and beyond. Potential Overlap: None References: U.S. Energy Information System query 2010 Data. U.S. EPA, 2011: November 2011, Natural Gas Star Program Accomplishment. PA. PUC, 2010: February 2010, Natural Gas Statistics Report for Pennsylvania U.S. EPA, Estimate of Methane Emissions from the U.S. Natural Gas Industry 6